Delivery scheduling issue

Hi.
Our users have created a sales order on 20.1.10(wednesday). The required delivery date in sales order is 22.1.10. The system has calculated the material availiblity date as 20.1.10. But this is wrong since i have checked that follwoing is maintained in the configuration of shipping point and route.
In shipping point DE123..........loading time is zero... and Pick/pack time is selected as" route dependent".
In the route DE1234, the transit time is 0.75. there is no transp lead time in route and factory calendar is B10 in route.
so ideally the matrerial avaiable date shud be 22.1.10 less 0.75 days=21.1.10......... but it is 20.1.10 in sales order
my questions are:
1) if pick pack time is route dependent in shipping point. where is pick pack defined in route. i cannot see it in route definition.
2) why system is calculating 20.1.10 ?
3) We have APO too. Is something coming into sales order from APO.
regds

Hi,
"Loading Time" & "Pick/pack time" comes from the Shipping Point.
"Transit Time" & "Transportation Planning Time" come from Route.
In your case, Customer required Delivery date is 22.01.10. Taking this date system starts with backward scheduling first.
Required delivery date - Transit Time = Goods Issue date(21.01.10).
Goods Issue date - Loading Time = Loading date.
Loading date - Pick/Pack Time = Material Availability date(20.01.10).
Therefore, I think system is taking either Pick/Pack time or Loading Time is 1 day for which system is determining 20.01.10 as Material Av date.
Check the lead times in your Shipping point & Route.
Regards

Similar Messages

PO - Item Data - Delivery Schedule Tab - Delivered qty, issued qty, GR qty

Hi Frens,
In a Purchase Order, under Item data < delivery schedule tab, we have delivered quantity, issued quantity and GR quantity fields.
Is there any TABLE to find out these quantities against PO.
Thanks and Regards,
CK Vikas

>
CK Vikas wrote:
> Hi Raj, You mean EKBE?
Yes EKBE is the right table for your requirement.

Schedule delivery qty issue in source inspection process

Hi,
Issue : System is blocking GR if any one of the schedule delivery qty is rejected against same PO.
System been used : Source inspection process.
Issue in details:
We create PO for 3000 kg with delivery schedule as 1000kg on 12th sept, 1000 kg on 13th sept and 1000 kg on 14th sept and save it.
Then we go to QI07 and create three inspection lots against this PO. So during user decision if we reject any one of the inspection lot then whole PO get block for GR, system should allow to do GR of 2000kg but it is not allowing, it say material is blocked for quality.
Kindly resolve my issue
Regards,

Hello,
I doubt whether you can do this using source inspection. Now let me give you another option which will be manual in nature.
1. Checking should happen before GR. - Make use of manual inspection(89 type)
2. System should restrict the GR if the material is rejected. - Do not release the quantity in quality info record if the material is rejected.
3.System should allow GR for partial approved material and restrict GR for partial rejected material against same PO - Release the required quantity in quality info record so that the GR can be done only for those quantities. A normal 01 inspection type lot will be created.
4. Rejected quantity material PO should get open to take GR for replacement of rejcted material of same PO - You can make use of 122 movement type in the lot so that GR can be done for the rejected quantity as well.
Regards
Gajesh

351 Issue only with delivery schedule wise

Hi,
Is it possible to issue (351) materials based on delivery schedule wise. Like in GR we get the receipts by del schedule wise.
Like i have SA 111111 for qty 999 and del sch is as below,
SA             target qty
111111        999
Del schedule for the above is :
01/01/2009      100
01/10/2009      200
01/20/2009      400
01/30/2009      299
Say when I issue using MIGO or MB1B for 351 Mvt type we get all the 999 quantities. What my requirement is i shld be able to get as per the del schedule lik four line items for this SA as in GR. If we do the GR for the above SA then it will show four line items. So we need as per GR only.
Is this possible or is there any changes we need to do or is there any userexit we can use to achive this.?
I appreciate your quick response.
Thanks,
Suresh

why do you issue with MIGO when you use SD delvieries?
You can issue from within the delviery by clicking the goods issue button, or with VL06G

Issue printing delivery schedule

Hello,
When printing delivery schedule for an agreement, only 12 pages were printed. There are about 43 lines on the agreement, but scheduel for only 25 lines was printed. Spool too is incomplete.
Please can anyone suggest what could be the reason behind the whole del. sch. not being printed.
Thanks
Mira

Hi Mira,
Are you using sched. agreement with release documentation (type LPA) or the one without release doc. (type LP)? In the former case, it is the release creation profile in the SA which determines how many lines will be printed (or actually how far in the future).
BR
Raf

ME2L Delivery Schedule Showing Fully Delivered Lines

Hey,
We are experiencing this issue on a SAP 4.7c system that we support.
Our business are trying to generate a report, every month, that is sent to vendors, of all the purchase orders that the business are expecting them to fill. To do this the business user uses ME2L report per vendor, only selecting the Schedule Agreements documents, hitting the calendar button (Delivery Schedule), exporting the resulting output to Excel, using a formula to identify the lines which have a GR value less than the Scheduled Qty value and sending these onto the vendor as a notification to the that these are the orders that the business have marked as outstanding.
The issue arose when the business cancelled lines on Scheduling Agreement 5500000073 by going into MD04 and deleting the requirement for vendor 5033760 and reassigned those requirements to a new Agreement 5500000053 for vendor 5000259.
However when you run the process above the deleted lines still show up on the report and you believe this should not be the case and never was the case.
What process to accurately identify on SAP, schedule line items, that have not being fully Goods Receipted and/or cancelled so they can be sent to the vendor?
Many thanks for any help,
Colm

Hi Jurgen,
Apologies for the delay, I was away on leave.
We use selection parameters WE101 and that correctly brings us back only open orders on the selection screen, however when we click the Delivery Schedule button it displays lines that have been fully Goods Receipted.
For example, if I have a PO with 3 lines, Lines 1 and 3 have been fully received and line 2 has only been partly received.
I run ME2L with the selection parameter WE101 and the report only displays line 2. Which is correct.
However when I click the delivery schedule button I will be shown the entire history of that line, including scheduled quantites that were fully goods receipted.
What I would like to see is only lines where the scheduled quantity is greater than the goods receipted quantity.
I hope this makes sense, thanks for your help,
Regards,
Colm

Deletion of Scheduling Agreement and Delivery Schedule using BAPI

Hi SAP MM Gurus,
Please assist in inquiry below:
My scenario is that I am trying to delete delivery schedules and scheduling lines using BAPIs. I have no issues when there is no GR made yet for the delivery schedules. The error arises when there are already existing Goods Receipts and Invoices for the schedule line that I wish to delete
When using the BAPIs (either BAPI_SAG_CHANGE or BAPI_SCHEDULE_MAINTAIN), I set the deletion indicator to "L" and set to X all change relevant fields (i.e. DELETION_INDX). However, whenever I execute it, I get the error message 06088. The funny thing is both the Quantities and the delivered quantities that are normally populated are left blank.
For example:
Normal error for 06088:
Quantity 100.0 smaller than quantity delivered 179.0
Error using BAPI with deletion indicator:
Quantity smaller than quantity delivered
Is this a bug of the BAPI? or am I just missing some settings?
Your immediate response is appreciated
Regards,
DeLo

Hi,
Please find the below link check the setting are correct or not
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a02cb00a-bfb4-2c10-98aa-e33e7f64ba28?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
Reagrds,
Pramod

*MRP unable to create Delivery Schedule Lines in MM Scheduling Agreement*

Hi Experts,
I need your help...
The issue is, in-spit of maintaining Source List with an u201CScheduling Agreement with item No.u201D & u201CSource List Usage in MRPu201D as 2 (Record relevant to MRP. Sched. lines generated automatically), MRP run does not generate Schedule Lines, instead PRs are created.
Please help me to understand such behavior and fix the issue as the requirement is to generate Schedule Lines only.
Thanks,
Pratap

Hello
Please check
1) Source List maintained properly in terms of Material # ; plant # ; proper POrg ; Schd Agr # and line item# ; proper validity date & MRP relevant indicator
2) Please also check Quata arrangement if you are using. whether % is maintained correctly against the vendor
3) MD03 , Delivery schedules- should be 3
4) check your planning horizon whether it is NETCH or not
5) check material master -MRP2 view, Procurement type is F- external procurement, schedule margin key if you are using
if everything above is set, then I feel it should work
Also please verify-
lot size, safety stock and the corresponding prod volume for MRP input v/s the stock available in MMBE
example.
MD04, we can see the open del lines.
if SS = 50 , prod volume is 150
1) if MMBE shows 200 then it wont generate any schedule.
2) if MMBE is 180 and your lotsize is 40, then after MD03, you will have a schedule line of 40 (provided if everything is set properly)
Please ensure there are NO open delivery lines . if you find such in MD04, then please close open delivery lines
in calculation of MRP, system considers such open delivery lines are going to receive and no additional schedule line generated even after MRP run
thanks

Forecast delivery schedule lines consumption

Hi,
I cannot fully understand what is the logic behind the consumption of the forecast delivery schedule lines. This is how the problem can be exactly defined:
- scheduling agreement with delivery orders (LZM)
- JIT delivery schedules are not used and no delivery schedule is maintained... just a forecast delivery schedule
- the whole process is manual, there is no EDI implied
- the cumulative received quantity is updated by an ABAP development that is triggered at delivery goods issue
The rest, happens normal - forecast schedule lines are updated weekly, the customer send pick-up sheets, a TAM delivery order is created, then delivery, GI...
The problem: not always the MRP requirements generated by the forecast delivery schedule lines are consumed by the delivery order/GI. If the delivery orders / deliveries are made on the exact quantity of the schedule lines everything works fine. It is also ok when there are two successive delivery orders with a cumulative quantity that matches exactly the forecast line. As soon as a over-delivery is made, everything turns upside-down: older delivered schedule lines appear again in planning as if nothing was delivered until now...
I suspect that the problem is related to the fact that the whole process is manual and updating the cumulative received quantity is not the only parameter that is counting... is it so? Or the forecast delivery schedule has to be respected 100% in terms of quantities and timing?
I would really appreciate your help.
Regards,
H.

Also please clarify whether delivery schedule lines in ME38 (even it is created automatically), in Planning time fence, will get affected by MRP run.

The delivery schedule lines don't get created automatically on MRP run.

Hi All,
The delivery schedule lines don't get created automatically on MRP run for subcontracting material. I have maintained source list as follow eg.
Valid from | Valid to | Vendor | Porg | PPI | Agreement | Item | Fix | MRP | MRP area
02.11.2009 | 31.12.2999| XYZ | XY01| |AA0000XYZE |10 | X |2 | ABC
Could you please help me about this issue
Thanks in advance.

Hi Amit,
Please ensure the value of Special procurement key in the MRP2 view for the material. It should be maintained as 30 - subcontracting.
Thanks and Regards,

Delivery Schedule in Scheduling agreement

Hi
We have a scheduling agreement created in MM in ME31L for subcontract process .
Delivery schedule mentioned for first two line items are 5/07/2008 .
Deliver schedule mentioned for 3rd line item is 02/08/2008 .
Due to this different requirement dates, always delivery split happens .
Regarding this , I request you to clarify below points .
1. I understand these delivery schedule were mentioned when this scheduling agreement was created . Afterwards there is no updating happened for delivery schedules .
Afterwards many deliveries have been generated with reference to these scheduling agreement , user is creating delivery every month with reference to this scheduling agreement . I mean how it is possible to create many deliveries with one schedule date .where as in SD , we need to update schedule lines always.
Thanks In Advance

Excellent information !
I understood what you have mentioned .
Just I need your clarifications for my below queries to fix this issue .
There are 6 line items in this scheduling agreement .
For 3 line items , delivery schedule date is 02/08/2008 . for another 2 line items, delivery schedule is 05/07/2008 . due to this different delivery schedules for line items in scheduling agreement . whenever user creates delivery , delivery split is happening .
In order to avoid this problem , can ask user to change delivery schedule for another 2 line items to 02/08/2008 from 05/07/2008 . ?
If user change this delivery schedule for this line items , is there any ramification in anyway ?.
Thanks In Advance

Forecast delivery schedules incorrect cumulative release quantity.

Hi Gurus,
We implemented the standard LZM - Scheduling agreement with delivery orders solution for component suppliers.
The entire SAP standard configuration activated and the functionality is working correct.
u2022     Scheduling agreement type LZM / Item category LZMA / Schedule line category L2
u2022     Order Type TAM / / Item category TAMA / Schedule line category CP
Example:
Scheduling agreement forecast delivery schedule for 1000 units./ Md04 show SchAgr of 1000 units
Delivery order for 250 units (MD04 Shows Order for 250 units and SchAgr for 750 Units)
Created delivery for the order (MD04 shows Deliv. For 250 units SchAgr for 750 Units)
Goods issue the delivery / MD04 shows the SchAgr for 750 units.
*Issue:*
When we update the Cumulative quantity received by the customer it is summing up with the forecast quantity (double counting the shipped quantity).
When the Cumulative quantity received by the customer updated to remove the in-transit quantity, the forecast is adding by 250 units and   MD04 shows SchAgr for 1000 units.
Thanks & Regards
Suresh

Hi Suresh
The *** issued qty gets updated when the PGI for the delivery happens. There is a field called *** received by customer and it gets updated when customer sends the *** back in the 830 or 862 as the case may be.
The difference between the *** issued and the *** recieved is always shown in transit.
If you do not want the schedule line to be opened up, then in *** recd change it to the *** issued or ideal option is populate the last delivery PGI'd on the delivery number field next to *** recd field. Hope this helps and let me know if you need any more informataion
Regards

Scheduling Agreements / Delivery Schedule / Firm zone, Trade zone

Dear all.
I am in the process of setting up scheduling agreements (LPA type) with firm zone and trade zone in SAP 4.5b
The following issues I have:
1.) with the release via ME84, it gives me an error 'no processing message ME 857, no message record found'.
As far as I know the customizing is correct. Can some one give a tip about what I maybe have forgotten?
2.) I am also using the firm and trade zone, but in the automatic generated delivery schedules line it is not turning up?
If there is any one who can help me with this subject, any information is welcome.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Wilfred

You have to create a condition record for your message type LPH1 in order to be able to generate the message (mn10).
At funcional level, try to update your schedule line manually through TCode me37 and then go to the ME84.
At customizing level, here are some things that were missing when it occurred to me :
Check in SPRO - Purchasing - Messages - Output Control - Message Types -
Define message type for scheduling agreement schedule lin - Fine-Tuned Control: Forecast Delivery Schedule/Expediter that you have operation 9 for LPH1 and the checkbox activated.
Check in SPRO - Purchasing - Messages - Output Control - Message Determination Schemas - DefineMessage Schema for Scheduling Agreement Release - Define Message Determ. Schema: Forecast Delivery Schedule/Ex in the control data : You must havefor LPH1 the requirement 109.
Hope it helps
Regards

Forecast delivery schedules and JIT deliveries

Hi Gurus,
Got a question on sales scheduling agreements schedule lines. Our customer sends 10 weeks of forecast delivery schedules and 2 weeks of JIT deliveries. which one of these two are passed to MD04?
Assuming only forecast delivery schedules are seen in MD04:
Assuming customer sends forecast delivery schedule for week2 as 50. but in JIT deliveries he only sent 40 for that week. if only forecast deliveries are see in md04, then my forecast and planning quantity is 50 , but actually my JIT delivery is only 40. AM I producing 10 extra? that means my planning is wrong?

925,
so in system it will show on 3/21 monday
I guess this means that you are entering using a Day format rather than Week format.
You have answered you own question already. If the online SAP help, which you have read and reasonably paraphrased, is not clear enough to make you understand this, I cannot help you.
JIT horizon is 3/23, Forecast is for 3/21.
As I stated before, even though it may in your mind represent a week's demand, it is still for one day. There is no bucketing, nor time-based disaggregation, nor consumption. It is just a scheduling agreement.
You wrote
am using MRP indicator D. that means within jit horizon, consider my jit quanity for requirements. and after jit horizon consider my forecast delivery schedules as requirements.
. This is a reasonable paraphrase of the SAP online help. Do you believe this?
Forecast schedule is for 3/21. NOT for W 12/2011. This is before the JIT horizon, isn't it? What do you think will happen to the forecast schedule, looking at the last 'rules' you just wrote? and as stated in the SAP help that you read?
Now you want to enter JIT schedules. 21/22/23/24/25/26. JIT horizon is 23. 24/25/26 are after JIT horizon. What do you think will happen, based on the 'rules' you just wrote?
I feel my time is being wasted when you keep asking me these questions, already having the answers explicitly stated in SAP oinline help. Since you do not have access to a system, this cannot be a support issue, it is a evidently a matter of idle curiosity for you. I therefore believe I will will move onto other forum questions, where there is a possibility that the questioners will get some business benefit from my answers.
Best Regards,
DB49

Scheduling Agreement New Delivery Schedule With & Without Proposal

Hi Experts!
I had an issue regarding our scheduling agreements. Issue is below:
What is the difference between "New Delivery Schedule <b>WITH</b> Proposal" and New Delivery Schedule <b>WITHOUT</b> Proposal"?
Any responses will be greatly appreciated and points. Thank you for your time!!
Best Regards,
WC

In addition to the above post,
as you changed the date manually from 2nd to 3rd....
so there are was no report for 2nd generated ulitmately...and if generated it was changed...right...
so when you again run the mrp...the system will generate one more pr for the same article....
this ultimately happens because of the set del dates in the MMR as i told above..
Hope it helps..
Regards
Priyanka.P

Delivery scheduling issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for