Double target qty in cost analysis

In one of plant for particular order type, system always saw target qty as double.
Example; confirm qty is 100 kg then system saws target qty as 200 kg in cost analysis of COR3 screen. Actual qty coming correct. Even when I'm checking goods movement for order seing 100 kg for 101 movement. Then why target saws 200 kg. Fyi, there is no change in BOM or recipe from creation date.
Again this issue happens only in 1 plant out of 5 and particular 1 order had this issue.
Can you please help to understand system this behaviour? What could be issue?

Hi Eric,
Please take a look of this thread:
Analyzing Costs on Production Order
This is what Akhil Baluja said:
In your case, the target quantity is double from Plan quantity might be because of in Routing of the material the Base quantity used for calculation of Standard Cost might be double & after the cost estimate has been released it was reduced to correct figure Or the Alternate routing was used while calculating standard Cost & in actual production.
Please check....
Check if this could be your problem.
Kind Regards,
Mariano

Similar Messages

  • Pocess order - target quantity in cost analysis report

    hi experts ,
    i am not getting the target quantity in cost analysis report of header material , though i have made the GR of the process order .
    target quantity is showing zero.
    i am getting target quantity of components , sfg used.
    kindly give your inputs.
    reagrds,
    satish

    Dear
    First Check the Validity of the standard cost for the header material, It can be seen in ck13n, Dates tab.
    Target costs are populated when you do the goods receipt. System will search for the released standard cost estimate and then apply that for each material component. If these 2 conditions are passed, then you will get target cost in order.
    Plan cost = Plan qty * std cost estimate
    Target Cost = Actual qty * std cost estimate
    Actual cost = Actual qty * actual costs
    Eg:
    A production order is planned for producing 10 units of a material
    Then plan cost on the order = 10 units * std cost
    Target costs are calculated once production is confirmed.
    Suppose only 9 units were produced out of 10 planned
    Then target cost = 9 units * std. costs
    Regards
    Ganesh M

  • Planned qty in Cost analysis

    Hi ,
    We are follwoign PER settelement with Production orders.
    1.  When we create Production order and save Planned qty and Act qty (zero) is not getting updted at the time of save.
    2. Target cost is zero so that i could not calculate variances.
    can you please help.
    Thanks,
    Sudha

    Hi Umapathi,
    Thats fine.
    My concern is when we save the production order the order qty will be updated in Planned qty tab of Cost analysis right, thats not happending.
    Yes Actual qty will be udpated at the time of GR or confirmation i know, but while saving the order Act qty will be as '0', even that not happening now .
    Both columns are blank.
    Kinldy reply.
    Thanks,

  • Re: Target Quantity in Cost Analysis for process Order

    Hi ,
    How is the target quantity is being calculated in Process order.
    Two of BOM components total target qty, is different from the plan quanity.
    Please advice.
    Regards,
    Vivek Sharma

    Hi Vivek,
    Can you pl share the cause of the same.
    Ulhas

  • Report  for bom wise target and actual cost as well as qty at line item

    Dear Experts,
    Is there any standard tcode for bom wise target and actual cost as well as qty at line item level for the month.
    there is one tcode s_alr_87013127 but user has to double click in order to get line item details.
    I want to see line item wise breakup/bom wise target and cost cost as well as qty.
    Thanks in advance.
    regards
    RK

    Dear experts,
    I am still looking for a revert.
    regards
    RK

  • Process Order Cost Analysis Target and Actual Quantity Missing

    This is related to Process order costing .
    Issue : Before activating  Material Update field in Costing view 1 of Material master , we have created few process orders and Delivered .
    Hence cost analysis shows Actual and target cost fields  Empty in COST ANALYSIS  report of  order  . After Updating field in Material master , New Process orders are calculated with Actual and Target cost .
    Solution needed : How to do Actual and Target cost estimation back in cost analysis report  for old process orders which are created before Material Update field ?

    You have deleted the Component in the BoM.
    Then you have created a production order, check if the start date of this order is after the date change in the BoM..... Can be that the component stills exists in the order ? Have you tried deleting the compoent in the order BoM ?

  • Total Target Cost in Cost Analysis report

    Hi Everybody,
                 I have come across a problem. In transaction cor3 when I give the process order then in goto>costs>analysis  in the given  report I wouldnt be able to find the relevent tables for the field 'Total Target Cost' if someone could help me from where I will be able to reterive this field data  int he definition they gave me the fomula
    Total Target cost = Target Cost debit + target Cost credit.
    If someone have any information regarding target Cost Debit and Target Cost Credit  please help me out. I will be very thankful to him or her.
    Regards,

    Hi Everybody,
                 I have come across a problem. In transaction cor3 when I give the process order then in goto>costs>analysis  in the given  report I wouldnt be able to find the relevent tables for the field 'Total Target Cost' if someone could help me from where I will be able to reterive this field data  int he definition they gave me the fomula
    Total Target cost = Target Cost debit + target Cost credit.
    If someone have any information regarding target Cost Debit and Target Cost Credit  please help me out. I will be very thankful to him or her.
    Regards,

  • Target Costs- Cost Analysis

    Hi all
    In the cost analysis screen of the productin order display (CO03), the target costs column shows zeros for all the cost components, but it is supposed to display the target figures for the order.
    Any idea why all zeros are displayed?
    Thanks in advance
    Rasa

    Hi,
    Good evening and greetings,
    The target costs will appear when the Planned Quantity and Actual Quantity are different...For ex, I create a production order with planned quantity as 100 and completed entire 100 before the production order settlement then the target cost will not be applicable because the variance is between Planned and Actual in this case...If the actual quantity is 80, then the system cannot find the variance between 100 and 80 thereby the entire 20 will be variance...in order to avoid that the system recalculates the planned cost based on actual quantity to arrive at target cost and finds the variance between Target and Actual.
    Please reward points if found useful
    Thanking you
    With kindest regards
    Ramesh Padmanabhan

  • Co03 cost analysis target

    Hi,
    I see there is target quantity / target cost / actual qty / actual cost.
    May I know what is target quantity and target cost? Is it similar to standard?
    Thanks

    Hi,
         Though it is correctly /conceptually defined by Raja Sekhar about the Actual Quantity and Actual Cost.
    As far as the Target Costing(Quantity) is concerned,Please find my response which elaborates precisely in genral terms of the business-
    There is no clear definition to target costing. Organisations that have implemented it have
    had to apply their own unique approach to the concept. In essence, it is a philosophy in
    which product development is based on what the market will pay for it, not on what it has
    cost to produce. In other words, market price becomes the determinant of cost and not the
    other way around, as is the practice with most organisations.
    Target costing is a strategic management tool that seeks to reduce a productu2019s cost over its
    lifetime. Therefore, the target cost is not necessarily the cost to currently build the product.
    Target costing presumes interaction between cost accounting and long-range profit planning; and a commitment to continuous cost reduction.
    and you can apply the same logic while executing it for your desired business process in SAP determined by your process owners.
    Hope it helps you at some extent.
    Cheers
    Chandra

  • Total Actual Qty is 0 in Cost Analysis

    Hi All,
    When I run Cost Analysis in COR3, 'Total Actual Qty' for labor hours is 0 even if we have confirmed hours. Why does the cost analysis post 0?
    We confirm using COR6N.
    Thank you and good day!

    Hi
    Go to KP26 for the current period 10 and To period 10 fiscal year 2009, with respecitve cost and activity type., check whether proper cost has been assigned for the period.

  • Cost analysis through Purchase Order created from Sales Order

    Hi Experts,
    This is the scenario: There is an Item No. which is not stocked in warehouse and is purchased only when customers ask for it. The cost of the sales order line having this item is calculated by the Purchase Order line on which the item is there. (The PO have items for other Sales Orders as well. And, Sales Orders have multiple item types) The Sales Order have the PO no. against it and Purchase Order has SO no. against the line. This is all done using MS Access and Sage Accounts. Lots of free typing and manual cost analysis involved.
    I have gathered from this forum that we can create Purchase Order from the Sales Order. The Document No. information can be pulled from one another using Formatted Search. Can we do the accounting and cost analysis as well?
    Please let me know if I have not made myself clear.
    Thank you in advance and kind regards.
    IC
    Edited by: iancameron03 on Sep 20, 2011 4:35 PM

    Hi Ian,
    I concur with Faraz, it is better if you use procurement document facility in doing back to back transaction from SO to PO.
    However, in your case, I'm afraid you can't analyze the gross profit and recording the accounting related activity as your request using standard SAP B1 function.
    As for gross profit case:
    Since you're actually using workaround in order to evade all hassles in maintaining all item master data related to this case, you create just one item code called S1 right?
    SO DocEntry - SO Line # - Item Code - Item Name - Quantity - Price
    1001 - 0 - S1 - Table - 2 - 100
    1001 - 1 - S1 - Chair - 8 - 25
    1001 - 2 - S1 - Cloth - 3 - 10
    PO # - PO Line # - PO BaseEntry (SO DocEntry)  - PO BaseLine (SO Line #) - Item Code - Item Name - Quantity - Price
    2001 - 0 - 1001 - 0 - S1 - 2 - 100
    2001 - 1 - 1001 - 1 - S1 - 8 - 25
    2001 - 2 - 1001 - 2 - S1 - 3 - 10
    Note that standard B1 gross profit calculation is that system will compare selling price for each item with item cost / certain price list of each respective item. However, in your case, you put all item as a single item master. Thus, system couldn't compare Table to Table, Chair to Chair, Cloth to Cloth since the item cost for these 3 items will be the same, the price list for these 3 items will also be the same since it is actually only one master data. Of course you could update the gross profit calculation manually for each SO, but to be honest it seems rather weird to do this manually.
    So, in order to simulate the gross profit calculation, you need to create a custom query and comparing PO line no with SO line no.
    As far as accounting related recording concern, I'm afraid you can't do it
    1. SO 1 : Item Table - Selling price 130 ; Item Chair - Selling price 30
    2. PO 1 (linked to SO 1) : Item Table - Purchase price 100 ; Item Chair - Purchase price 25
    3. SO 2 : Item Table - Selling price 150 ; Item Chair - Selling price 40
    4. PO 2 (linked to SO 2) : Item Table - Purchase price 110 ; Item Chair - Purchase price 30
    Correct me if I'm wrong, you want to record accounting wise that CoGS of Delivery based on SO 1 is 100 for Table and 25 for Chair, isn't it? No matter what costing method you use, you can't achieve this.
    If you use moving average, system will average both Table and Chair cost price, since it is actually one item master data. Even if you distinguish each item as a master data, system will average the cost price for Table and Cloth by the time GR for PO 1 and PO 2 occurred.
    Example (order by sequence of event):
    1. GR based on PO 1 - Table - Purchase price = 100, therefore Item cost = 100
    2. GR based on PO 2 - Table - Purchase price = 110, therefore Item cost = 105 (considering quantity only one for both PO)
    3. Delivery based on SO 1 - Table - CoGS incurred will be 105, not 100
    To certain extent, same thing could be said with FIFO costing method
    1. GR based on PO 1 - Table - Purchase price = 100 (qty 1)
    2. GR based on PO 2 - Table - Purchase price = 110 (qty 1)
    3. Delivery based on SO 1 - Table - CoGS incurred will be 100 (qty 1)
    4. Delivery based on SO 2 - Table - CoGS incurred will be 110 (qty 1)
    At first glance, it seems right since the CoGS for SO 1 is 100, tied up with purchase price for PO 1. And CoGS for SO 2 is 110, tied up with purchase price for PO 2. But we're using assumption here, we're assuming the sequence of Goods Receipt of PO and Delivery of SO occurred in the very same sequence as the issuance of SO and PO.
    1. GR based on PO 1 - Table - Purchase price = 100 (qty 1)
    2. GR based on PO 2 - Table - Purchase price = 110 (qty 1)
    3. Delivery based on SO 2 - Table - CoGS incurred will be 100 (qty 1)
    4. Delivery based on SO 1 - Table - CoGS incurred will be 110 (qty 1)
    If above scenario / sequence that happened, you will get the wrong figure of gross profit since the Delivery of SO 2 will take the item cost based on GR of PO 1. Since we're actually talking about real life business process, who can guarantee that above scenario wouldn't happen? It is possible that you send goods to customer who ordered late in real life, too much possibility that it is better for you to mitigate such result.
    My suggestion would be that you record the accounting transaction based on standard business process, no need to really capture the actual cost and actual gross profit for certain SO and PO. Too complicated, and the software itself doesn't cater this kind of requirement. Best thing you could do only create custom query for gross profit simulation calculation, but for very accurate accounting recording, IMO you should forget it. Hope this help.
    Best Regards,
    Hendry Wijaya

  • To develop Z-Report related to Cost Analysis as in COR3

    Hi,
    I am trying to develop a Z-Report similar to Cost analysis as in COR3, I just want to know the tables where actually the Planned Qty,Planned Cost,Actual Qty,Actual Cost are getting stored.My requirement is to run it for Multiple Orders with some more fields to add on(for eg. Accounting Document).Please help.
    Regards,
    Sandeep

    For finding out the tables.
    use st05> activate the trace> then come back COR3 then execute the same . after showing the output--> go back st05 and deactivate the trace and then use list trace. There you can all tables used in COR3

  • Cost analysis not showing up in production order

    Hi All
    Preliminary cost analysis is not showing up in the production order...can anyone suggest what could be the possible reason for this

    Hi,
    Once you issue goods(GI) to order then only you can see actaul cost in cost analysis in Production order.
    if you are looking for target cost in cost analysis,you have to post goods receipt(GR) from order to inventory.
    hope this helps you.
    Thanks,
    Rau

  • Why targetcosts are not displaying in cost analysis

    hi
        i have created productcost collector thru kkf6n for a material.
    for that material i have backflashed and confirmed thru MFBF.then
    i display the cost analysis of productcostcollector where system is
    showing only Actual costs not target costs.
       can any body tell me why it is not displaying the targetcosts
    Thanks,
    Neelima

    Hi prasad kumar,
    1. Make sure the target cost version 0 (TCode: OKV6) is maintained correctly.
    2. Update run the variance calculation (Tcode: KKS6/KKS5) for the PCC.
    Regards

  • Cost analysis report

    Hi,
    In a production order we can go to 'Cost Analysis' to check plan / target / actual / variance values.
    What is to be done if we need a collective report of multiple orders.
    is there any standard report? 
    thanks in advance.
    neeraja

    Hi Neeraja
    Set up summarization hierarchy in KKR0 - Execute KKRC to collect data and Execute KKBC_HOE
    KKRC will be monthly activity to be done after each period end closing i.e. after settlement of orders
    br, Ajay M

Maybe you are looking for

  • Extending capacity of a third party RAID - OS X not using extra space

    I have an infortrend RAID which we have added extra drives to for more capacity, the RAID logical volume size has increased and I can see it has gone up from around 6Tb to 7Tb in Disk utility, but we cannot resize the partition to use this increased

  • Photshop CS6 image resizing tool.

    Five time I have entered a support question but it does not seem to appear in the lists nor have I had a response, am I entering my request incorrectly? My request is: I have a PC using Windows 7. I have Photoshop CS6 which I have been using for some

  • How to restore certain files on an iPad?

    I wish to restore, on my iPad, some Tunein files from a iTunes backup, that got lost because of a failed "upgrade" for Tunein (recordings). Is this possible, & if so, could someone please direct me to information as to how? Thanks. h

  • PostgreSQL v. 8x, not Update, not Insert and not delete.

    Hi, I have a perfect solution to this problem. Please, contact-me by mail: [email protected] that I send de free and open sources with the solution. Leandro Severino.

  • Wrong number of pixels on export

    Hi, I am trialing Illustrator at present and have run into a problem. I am trying to create exact pixel output for use in an interface. In this case its a 1920*1080 pixel size. So that the size i set up in illustrator, but when i export to say a PNG