Employer Unemployment Tax Not Being calculated in US Payroll

Hi Experts,
Employer Unemployment Tax (Tax Type 10) for Tax Authority Alabama is not being calculated in US Payroll in my SAP system.
The taxable amt is showing up, but the tax is not being calculated in the payroll log.
No error/warning mssg is provided by BSI in the payroll log.
I have already checked for the following:
1)We are using the standard tax model 002 provided by SAP for Alabama
The tax model settings are fine.
2) Table T5UTX is being maintained.
3) Tax Type 10 is setup against tax auth Alabama in BSI Tax Factory.
For tax auth Federal too, though the taxable for tax type 10 shows up, tax is not being calculated.
Can you please help.
Regards,
Somdeb.

Hello Somdeb,
Please be aware that this is no standard SAP tax model only an example which must be customized as every customer is different.
First check the payroll log to see if the information is being sent to BSI TaxFactory. If not then the issue is mostly the tax model. Different tax models can be used based on the employee.
If the values are being sent to BSI and not being calculated, then there is an issue wil BSI. Send BSI the script and they will tell you what the issue is.
Regards,
Manny

Similar Messages

Tax (VAT) being calculated on sales invoices where products are zero rated?

Hi
We are in the process of testing v. 12.1.2 (upgrading from v. 12.0.4).
We are producing sales invoices of zero rated products. However, tax is being calculated on these products. Have checked the item set up and the item is definately set to UK zero fiscal classification.
Is there somewhere in customer set up and/or tax administrator I can check to see if any of our set up is incorrect?
Regards
Jon

When I tested this for the Customer I was able to calculate sales tax on an A/R invoice even when the BP was set to Exempt. I just want to make sure the system is functioning correctly. If I need to change the BP from Exempt to Tax Liable in order to be able to charge tax in some cases then I will do so.
Also, I was told by another SAP consultant the the ONLY thing SAP looks at when deciding to calculate tax was the Ship to address tax code, which does not seem to be the case.
Don

Mid month period not being calculated in pay slip

Hi Experts,
Mid month period given in 0008 is not being calculated.
e.g. if i hire some one on 16.01.09, then 0008 data should be calculated for those days only (e.g. 16 days) in pay slip. But in my case it is taking full amount of 0008.
Can any one kindly help, pl.
thanks
Balu

Dear Sikindar,
thanks for the replay.
PCL 1 and PCL10 are having 3 and 1 respectively.
checked the control record and the pay roll area of that employee and generation of pay roll periods are available in V_T549Q.
please guide me further
thanks
Balu

Pricing condition for Taxes in R/3 not being calculated.

We have SRM4.0 in classic mode with R/3 4.6C. In SRM we configured Tax calculation is in R/3. When creating the shopping cart, EBP calls R/3 via RFC for the Tax % and displays the tax information in the cart successfully. The cart is saved and the completed PO is created in R/3. However, our pricing condition for tax, at Pur.Org/Material group in R/3 does not get calculated - so in the item condition screen, no tax is calculated. If i go into the change PO and in Item conditions/Update, (G-Copy Pricing and Redetermine taxes) then it is OK (but this is not ideal). When i do an RFC trace, using RSRFCTRC, i can see my Pur Org, Material Group and Tax code all being passed to R/3. Also, when i do a manual SE37 test on funct.mod. BAPI_PO_CREATE, it does calculate tax correctly - i am stuck - any help appreciated. rgs Adam

Dear Poster,
As no response has been provided to the thread in some time I must assume the issue is resolved, if the question is still valid please create a new thread rephrasing the query and providing as much data as possible to promote response from the community.
Best Regards,
SDN SRM Moderation Team

DP macros are not being calculated correctly using process chain

Hello all!!
I have this DP planning book with two grids, which the second grid has some macros. I have to put this macros execution in a Process Chain, but it´s very strange because, when I execute the macro directly in the interactive planning the result is correct, but when I execute it using the process chain, the result is wrong.
The selection profile and the aggregation level in the Process Chain is the same that is being used in the selection profile.
I´ve already created the activities and also the planning job to be used in the process chain.
Could you help me?
Best regards
Angela

I would suggest to create a test selection Id with a few products (say 5) and create a new job with this selection profile and include that job in the process chain and execute it. Please monitor the job log while porcessing... for this right click on the process in the process chain and select 'Display all jobs'..it will take you to the SM37 screen..there click the job log and spool file and observe what exactly the job is doing i.e whether its executing correctly or its skipping that process or something else is doing...
The second thing you can try out is by creating a separate dataview for the second grid in the test sytem and replicate the scenario and check if it has any impact, my guess is if process chain is not supporting the macros in the second grid
Edited by: sai balakavi on Dec 12, 2008 8:14 PM

Adobe Professional - Calculation not being calculated

I created a form containing several fields where people
input numeric values. For the most part it is working however there is one box (the last box in red, where it doesn't calculate right away until they enter a number in another field. Why is that? Each time someone enters a number, that field should re-calculate right away after the user moves on to the next field.
I cannot figure this problem out, please help. I'm attaching a word document containing a screenshot of the problem. I'm also attaching the PDF form.
--Gilbert

Change the field calculation order.

Sales taxes are being calculated on the conditions tab for service master

Hi All,
Create a PO for the following - Acct assignment cat F, item cat D, plant A001, CC USJ2, Pur org US10. Choose a service master. If you see in line item and check the conditions tab, you will find NAVS value is 0. Same NAVS value goes to EKPO-NAVNW where it is showing as 9% of the PO amount which actually should be 0. The scenario can be simulated by adding another line item copying an existing one. Now if we go to invoice tab and remove Jurisdiction code manually and then again put back the same Jur code, the problem vanishes.
BADI : EXTENSION_US_TAXES
Implementation Name : ZEXTENSION_US_TAXES
in this implementation we have 4 methods.
ME_CALCUL_SRV_TAX,MM_DATA_FOR_TAX_SYSTEM,ME_TAXCOM_MEPO,MM_ITEM_TAX_MODIFY,MS_TAX_DATA_LIMITS and MS_TAX_DATA_SERVICES.
But MM_ITEM_TAX_MODIFY, MS_TAX_DATA_LIMITS and MS_TAX_DATA_SERVICES are empty.
Please guide me in the right direction to resolve this issue.
Thanks in Advance,
Regards,
Raja
IBM.

Wrong assignment of P org with P grp is the route cause, found the error and rectified which is working fine.
Thanks and Regards,
Venkata Koppisetti.

Tax is not getting calculated in shopping cart

Hi,
I have problem in shopping, whenever I am creating a shopping cart it has to add tax amount of 17.5, which is not adding the tax amount, instead it is taking tax amount as 0.00.
Tax code is V1(domestic).
Could you please guide what exactly need to be changed?
Point will be rewarded.
Cheersu2026

Hello Viv
Did you resolve this issue?
I have the same problem !
Using EEC 6 and SRM V6 (SRM 2007) (same client setup)local config is on in ECC for Brasil and tax is being calculated ok here. However although all tax codes are visible in SRM no tax is being calculated????
Any advice would be much appreciated
Rachael

Tax not calculating for parked invoices

Hi
We are using external tax system to determine taxes in SAP. When an invoice in MIRO is posted normally, the external tax system is called and tax is getting updated. Whereas, when the invoice is parked for future posting, tax is not being calculated.
Please help.

Hi Nikitha
I am able to park the document with tax. The problem is when I return to the parked document, I cannot see the tax in the field i.e., it shows 0.00 and therefore the system does not allow me to post the document.

Taxes not picked up in MIRO

Dear all
while doing MIRO, taxes not getting calculated (for a newly created tax code used in PO)and it is giving error like
Error in account determination: table T030K key JOST JP5 VF
Message no. FF709
Diagnosis
In the chart of accounts to be posted to, no accounts are defined for the tax code you used.
Procedure
Contact your system administrator.
Define the accounts to which a tax posting is to be made with the tax code entered in Customizing for taxes on sales/purchases.
To do this, choose Maintain entries (F5).
what might be the reason and please suggest the way

Dear
I checked every where (1.while creating tax code maintaining % against the concerned condition types, 2.in taxation TAXINJ procedure maintained every condition types, 3.in OB40 all G/L accounts maintained properly for the tax code
After all this,when i maintained this tax code in PO for the plant(DEPO PLANT excise masters maintained for the material and tax rate maintained) and during MIGO i maintained these conditon values manually and posted the document
when i do MIRO only tax amount for VAT 12.5% picked
what about excise,education,secondary and special duty
Please guide me

Current condition is different than group conditon,tax not calculating

Hi,
I am working on a sales order for which tax is not getting calculated.For tax calculation puprose,a third party tool,vertex is being used. When i debug,i found that the RFC function module(which calculates the tax ) is not getting called. The code is written in such a way that the RFC will be called only if if the current condition type is also the group condition type for which all the items are currently being processed, but this condition is not satisfying. Can any one please tell me about the possible causes for this condition failure. I need the sollution badly.
Thanks & Regards,
Narendra Kumar

Hi,
As suggested by YADAV, use TCODE V/06 and click detail button and goto second window where u will find GROUP CONDITION do check it .
Regards
AJIT K SINGH
HAPPY TO HELP U

I have rented a movie on my ipad. It did not download due to not being on wifi at the time. I know I completed the rental because my gift card balance went down $3.99 plus tax. How do I find where to download the movie?

I have rented a movie on my ipad. It did not download due to not being on wifi at the time. I know I completed the rental because my gift card balance went down $3.99 plus tax. How do I find where to download the movie?

But now I can't find the actual movie...I go to iTunes to purchases and view movies , to downloads and searched the title of the movie...I can see an icon of it and it is in a separate place from other purchases but it says downloaded in faded lettering. Where is it?
If you can't find the movie you downloaded on your iPad, iPhone or iPod Touch, check inside your Videos App

Tax not calculated in MIRO for the condition type JVCD

Hi,
We made some new different tax code and attached with JVCD , its calculating in PO but in MIRO calculation part not done but for other condition type ,JVRD,JVRN system calculating well...
Please tell me some way why not system calculating in case of JVCD and JVCN for capital case..
Thanks in Advance,
Dharmveer

Hi,
We totally agreed with you and already we checked our configuration part is OK.Actually we want to map some process where we captured excise in GR but no need to take credit i.e. to post the excise in J1IEX,so we do not have to post our cenvat/modvat entry in MIRO but we need to calculate VAT whether it is deductible or non deductible.So far this thing is concerned,we made separate tax code which we use at time of MIRO posting and in configuration we did not attached the tax code in logitics-basic excise -assign to company code. Because once we attached here , system asking to make to pass furst RG part2 entry then it allows to post MIRO entry which we do not want .So please understand this scenario is different and we got the success for JVRN/JVRD for VAT but getting issue in case of capital VAT where system does not calculate tax for JVCN/JVCD .....where we want to process MIRO without posting J1IEX..
Please thing and analyse ..give some helping response..
Thanks,
Dharmveer

Tax not calculating for loss of pay on the reduced basic pay

Hi Experts,
We have an employee who has LOP for five days and hence the basic pay is reduced. However for tax calculation the system is not considering the reduced basic pay, it is considering the actual basic pay.
Eg
Employee X has 5 day Loss Of Pay for the month of May.
His actual Basic Pay is Rs 10,000
His Basic pay after considering the 5 day loss of pay is Rs 8,000 for the month May
For this particulat month system is calculating tax on actual Basic Pay i.e Rs 10,000. However we want the tax to be calculated on the reduced basic pay.
Please provide with your valuable inputs.
Thanks in Advance
Koutilya

Hi,
Tax is not calculated on the month salary. It is the annual salary on which tax is computed and deducted.
Annual salary gets stored in WT /410 (Regular Income) WT /411 (Irregular Income) and /413 (Perks).
Annual Regular income is computed as under:
Annual Reg Income = Regular Income Paid till last month + Regular Income for current month + Projected Regular income for balance months in the FY.
Check the values of these WTs in your case. These must be different in May from the values in April.
VK

TAX not Calculating for Unplanned Delivery cost in MIRO

Dear All,
I am having an issue with Unplanned delivery cost in MIRO,
We have to do an accounting of a invoice/PO which contains in addition to actual Value the Unplanned Delivery cost also, and for which also the TAXes also applicable with ED 10% and ECess 2%,SHcess 1% ,
Now in MIRO if i want to enter these Packing and forwarding chanrges in Unplanned delivery cost, but the TAX rates is not calculating for the same.
The TAX rates are calculating only for the values other than Unplanned delivery cost.
What i want TAX also need to be calculate based on the TAX code choosen in MIRO or as flow that of PO.
I have checked in OMR2, there we have mentioned Default Unplanned delivery cost tax code as ED NIL.
Can any where in the setting we can say by default the TAX rates should calculate as that of PO or whatever TAX codes we have choosen in MIRO.
How to achive this, pl help.
Regards,
Nagaraj S

hi
the screen shot i sent is also of 4.7E
now u can check OMR2 for default tax code for unplanned delivery cost
can u show us the screen shot of the details tab of MIRO
also check in SPR>MM>LIV>Configure How Unplanned Delivery Costs Are Posted
here what value u have maintained ,we are using 2 as (2 Different G/L line)
regards
kunal
Edited by: Kunal Ingale on May 19, 2010 6:18 AM

Employer Unemployment Tax Not Being calculated in US Payroll

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for