Film Look in  FCPHD from PAL miniDV

Hi everyone...
So, I shot a documentary on Pal miniDV (25fps). I'm hoping to achieve a more film-ish look.
I know that you can do this through Adobe After Effects by playing with the gamma curve and creating a small amount of motion blur - http://www.dvinfo.net/articles/filmlook/broadway1.php - though this deals with NTSC rather than PAL.
I have a couple of questions relating to the use of pal here, and I'd really appreciate the help from someone who's more experienced than I (which means just about everyone!)
(1) Does anyone have any comments about creating a more filmish look for PAL minidv rather than NTSC minidv? Is there a preferred method for PAL? With the frame rate at 25fps, you're theoretically 'closer' to film there, but what else can I do and what do I need to do differently?
(2) Is there a way of creating the film look in FCP directly without going over to Adobe After Effects? And does anyone have any opinions about the dis/advantages of the various methods for creating a film look?
(3) If I had to move over to Adobe After Effects to create the filmish look, I'd prefer to stay there to color correct. Anyone have any ideas about the dis/advantages of FCP's against AfterEffects's color correction tools?
If anyone can refer me to any articles with step-by-step instructions about creating the film look, I'd really appreciate that. There seem to be so many different ideas.
Okay, so I know I'm asking a lot and I apologise ...
Thanks so much!
Richard, Los Angeles

Hi Richard,
Part one of the dvinfo net article you referenced is to do with reproducing the motion signature that results when you add pulldown to 24fps film to get to 30fps for NTSC output. It does not apply to PAL footage. In PAL land, material shot at 25fps is simply slowed down to 24fps when printed to film (and vice versa for film material that is bound for video or TV).
So to repeat, pulldown motion signature is not really an issue for PAL projects (I say not really because it can be done, but the speed change is more commonly applied).
In your case however you are not concerned with frame rate changes, I don't think, you just want to apply a film look to your video. There are a number of ways to do this and by all accounts the Nattress filters are top notch for the price.
I'm sure you checked out part two of the article you referred to above, which is the real meat of the piece, so to speak. Personally I prefer to do this kind of curve/saturation/unsharpening etc in After Effects, although you I believe you can do all of this with equivalent filters in FCP. It's a matter of personal choice and AE has a fairly steep learning curve if you're not familiar with it already. If you have AE 6.5, however, check out the included Color Finesse colour correction suite, which is almost a standalone application and is pretty great. In my opinion it's better than AE's colour correction window but again it's a matter of choice as you can do pretty much everything you'll need to in both (especially for DV material).
Someone spoke of applying Motion Blur in the FCP motion tab - forget about that, that applies to blurring composited objects moving across the screen and will have no effect if applied to an entire layer of video. You could experiment with blur filters to soften your video slightly but if you're going this route the Nattress filters will probably be easier.
Good luck with your project!
Edit: on reading your post again I notice you're in LA - so I suppose you DO intend transferring your PAL material to NTSC. D'oh! Mea culpa - in that case as mentioned above I suppose conforming to 24fps then adding pulldown to get to 30fps is the way to go and will automatically give you the motion signature you require. I assume you can do this in Cinema Tools (not familiar with it) but you can also do it in AE by simply interpreting your footage in AE as 24fps and then adding pulldown.

Similar Messages

  • Film Look ...

    Hi,
    I have been racking my brains as to figure out how to give that 'film look' to PAL video in FCE. Using a clip, I 'selected all' and went into video effects to find de-interlace (or is 'interlace' that I need) ... I clicked on de-interlace and nothing happened.
    Is someone going to tell me that PAL is already de-interlaced? Have I got my terminology all wrong?
    If so, how can I get the effect I'm looking for?
    Thanks for your expertise!

    Doing a forum search would give you a plethora of results from people asking about the "film look", so please do your research; that having been said, I think you'll find that Nattress Film Effects is your answer. It's not free, but considering its performance, its completely worth it.
    http://www.nattress.com/

  • HELP! Digital Noise on Converted PAL minidv.

    Hi guys
    I took my music video project to the post house in Houston Texas and had them convert a NTSC minidv to PAL minidv.
    I checked out the video and audio on there deck in PAL format and everything looked fine.
    I sent the PAL minidv off to a PAL TV network in Pakistan because that's the tape they wanted it on and they replied that the PAL minidv has a lot of digital noise.
    They claim that there decks are clean.
    Now, I have a problem!
    What should I do?
    Can someone please help?
    I have got to find a solution for this please!
    Thanks,
    Zia

    Hey Zia, it's funny how when it's all said and done - delivery is paramount. If you sent the same (acceptable) tape that you saw, then no, the ZR20 isn't the issue.
    They broadcast from a MiniDV tape? It's a very succeptible delivery format, insofar that it's the least 'robust' of the tapes.
    Were they specific with their issues? noise all over the screen, or certain areas, how did it sound?
    Lastly, and I only say this because it happened to me many years ago - Do you have any way to verify their claims? I directed a spot once, and the client (overseas) claimed it was unuseable and wouldn't pay the producer. Weeks later the producer found that the spot was just fine, and the greasy client banked on nobody on the production team ever seing the spot... Not trying to be accusatory, just covering all the bases.
    Good luck.

  • How do I convert from PAL to NTSC in compressor?

    I have a project I converted from mp4 file to Apple Pro Res to edit it in FCP.  I exported using Compressor and tried to import the files to DVD Studio Pro.  It said it can't put PAL files into an NTSC project.  I didn't even realize it was filmed in PAL (yes, I have the rights to use the footage).  How do I convert the files from PAL to put it into FCP...in Compressor?  If so, how?  Thanks for any help!

    To  convert the 25fps PAL file to a 29.97fps file staying within the ProRes codec:
    • Open up compressor. In the Settings window select: Apple>Formats>Quicktime>ProRes 422
    • Select the "Duplicate Selected Setting" icon in the upper left of the Settings window
    • This creates duplicate of the preset that you can edit
    • Select the preset copy and, in Inspector, give it a new name (something like ProRes PAL>NTSC)
    • In Encoder>Video Settings>Frame rate - and change the frame rate to 29.97
    • In Frame Controls> turn them on and set Resize Filter and Rate Conversion to BETTER.  (If so set them to BEST, be prepared for a long wait)
    • In the Geometry tab, set the Frame Size to 720x480 (you don't say if the file is 16:9 or 4:3)
    • Submit the file and go have dinner. Depending on the length of the file, it may take hours.
    Have fun.
    x

  • How can I import from a MiniDV tape and keep the clip order

    A long time ago, I edited some MiniDV video together and recorded back out to a MiniDV tape using some older version of iMovie (ten years ago). I have latest version of iMovie (10.0.2) and have imported all of the edited video back into a new library. Unfortunately, the library is separating the video into separate clips and sorting them by the original timestamps of the original video (before editing). As a result, the clip are in a jumbled mess of an order.
    Note that I am just importing the video from the MiniDV tapes so that I can export it as a Quicktime file. I really don't need the video to be split into clips at all. I would actually prefer to just import the entire video as one big clip.
    Any idea how I can preserve the order of the

    One thing that I have noticed is that Apples built-in camera is optimized for Face Time, so it sometimes captures at 30 frames per second, but if there is not a lot of motion in the frame, it might use 12 or 15 frames per second. So it has variable frame rates. This is great for FaceTime, but not so great if you are trying to keep the audio in sync.
    The way to fix this is to use QuickTime Pro or MPEG Streamclip to save the movie out with identical specs except to specify 30 frames per second (or 25 in a PAL country).
    I wonder if you are running into a similar problem in QTPlayer. If it is making a variable frame rate movie, you could fix it by dragging the movie into MPEG Streamclip and exporting as the same kind of movie, but with a fixed 30 fps frame rate. MPEG Streamclip is free and quite useful for stuff like this.
    Just a thought.
    Right now my QuickTime Player is hanging so I can't test to see if you could set the frame rate directly in QuickTime Player X.

  • When watching my Apple TV (3rd gen) the picture jumps a few frame every few seconds, this happens when I rent a film or play back from my new Mac Pro, my Wifi is the Airport Express.

    When watching my Apple TV (3rd gen) the picture jumps a few frames every few seconds, this happens when I rent a film or play back from my new Mac Pro, my Wifi is the Airport Express.

    These may be different issues, but lets look at rentals first.
    Poor motion can result from mismatched output. If your source is 24 or 30 fps you should set the output of the Apple TV to 60 Hz, for 25 fps content use 50 Hz.
    Additionally motion software on the TV itself can cause the picture to jump, check your TV settings and turn off any motion settings in use,

  • How to convert from PAL to NTSC in compressor

    I have a project I converted from mp4 file to Apple Pro Res to edit it in FCP.  I exported using Compressor and tried to import the files to DVD Studio Pro.  It said it can't put PAL files into an NTSC project.  I didn't even realize it was filmed in PAL (yes, I have the rights to use the footage).  How do I convert the files from PAL to put it into FCP...in Compressor?  If so, how?  Thanks for any help!

    Since you've already edited it, export from fcp (file:  export:  quicktime movie - NOT quicktime conversion) with current settings.  Bring this file into compressor and apply the appropriate dvd preset.  Thencustomize the preset, changing the frame rate to 29.97 fps and video format to ntsc in the encoder panel:  the pixel dimensions in the geometry panel to 720x480 (not sure if this is necessary, but doublecheck it).  Then in the frame controls panel, enable frame controls and change the resize filter to best, and rate conversion to 100% of source and rate conversion to best.  This may take a long time to output, so you might want to do a short test by setting an in and out in the compressor preview window.
    Hopefully, I haven't left anything out.  If there are any questions, post back.

  • What settings should I use when working with video from a minidv?

    I'm recording with a panasonic ag-dvc7 and eddeting on cs5 and would like to get the best quality on video. Im new to all this so I really don't know haw to set up the settings when starting the project.

    Well, the easiest way would be to simply drag the video file to the new item icon in your bin, and PrPro will automatically create a timeline that best fits your video. However, doing so won't actually teach you anything about it. If you're wanting to actually learn the ins-and-outs, then start doing some googling about codecs, wrappers, video standards, etc.
    From a minidv tape, you'll probably be safe manually picking one of the NTSC presets (unless you're in Europe, in which case it would be a PAL preset). Chances are you're shooting 29.97fps, though it might be 23.976, so you should check the properties of your video file in PrPro to see which it is. You'll either be in wide screen (16:9) or standard (4:3) so you'll need to pick which of those you want as well.
    When you start getting into HD footage, it gets a lot more complicated--SD is fairly easy.

  • Why can't my HD to SD SHORT film look good? Best Encode?

    I have a 12 minute short film on HDV. I imported it to FCP5 and then DVDSP4 and created an HD-DVD and it looked GREAT. Then I found out my computer is pretty much the only DVD player that can play the HD-DVD I had created. Thus began my journey to make a decent SD-DVD, and so far I am not even close...
    HERE'S WHAT I'M DOING:
    1. I used FCP to downconvert from HDV to DV (I don't have access to the camera to use it downconvert option). I'm sure this step is where the quality drops at least 4 generations!
    2. DVDSP5 > Preferences > Mode: Two Pass VBR, Bit Rate: 5.5, Max Bit Rate: 8.5, Motion Est: Best
    IMAGE PROBLEM:
    Lots of pixelation in darker areas of the screen. Places i could see in HD are now just black and pixelated black at that.
    TWO QUESTION:
    1. My main annoyance is this: When I burn the DVD, it only burns about 20% of the DVD (HD-DVD would use 60%). I have the space on my DVD-R, why can't I utilize this space and burn 90% of this space with data to make my film look good?
    2. iDVD did a better job of making the SD DVD look good. So I know there is something i could do. I've never used Compressor. How can I encode my HDV for use in SD DVD environement in DVDSP5?
    Any help will be much appreciated... I hope answers to these questions helps others as well...
    Best,
    AJ

    AJ -
    Thanks for your reply -I hope i can clarify below.
    Yes i have been editing the sequences using native HDV 1080i.
    When comparing the output of the converted formats here is what i did.
    I have a Sony a HC1 HDV Camcorder. I captured and edited all clips with native HDV. Then i recorded back the HDV material back into the camera (HUGE issues with doing this in FCP - but ill leave that to another thread)
    From there i did two things
    1) I sent the native HDV Final Cut sequence to compressor and set it to DVD, 90Min, Best quality, 2pass VBR. I burned a DVD with DVDSP4 with this encoded sequence
    2) i played back the HDV Sequence from my sony camcorder back into the television directly - but using the composite video output (not using the high definition component output).
    3) I set my Sony HDV cam to output via firewire as standard DV (eg - i let the camera do its own HDV to DV downconvert). from there i recaptured back into FCP, compressed with the same compressor settings, and sent to DVDSP4
    I compared side by side the content from all three options. Hands down Options 2 and 3 looked MUCH better than option 1.
    Here is what i noticed
    1) A lot of motion artifacts with option 1. This especially when the camera pans and moves. I think this has to do with the way interlacing during downconversion happens. If i run the FCP sequence through a de-interlace filter it actually does come out better - though not as smooth since you are loosing 1/2 the frames.
    2) A lot of digital artifacts. pixellation and such like. It looks almost like one of those old VCDs in terms of image quality.
    I had searched the forums and found that many other people are having the same problems - so i know that i am not alone on this one (unfortunately). I do find it frustrating that a very expensive >$1000 application suite which claims to support HD has so many issues with editing in HD (this is just one of the issues.. others are that you cannot reliably export HDV back to tape, there are issues with editing multi-cam with HDV with more than 3 sequences... etc..).

  • I know.. not another film look question, but here is goes...

    Hi all i hope you can help me here.
    Im used to doing safety, corporate, induction videos so Ive never been interested in getting the "film look" But now Ive got a music video to do and i really don't want it to look interlaced.
    Now i did some test on my HVX200 25p, and read up on it a little. Which brought me to my question.
    I know that when shooting with real film cameras AND HD 25p cameras there is the rule not to pan very fast because it becomes jittery. But when i did my tests outside with my HVX200 25p PAL on a tripod (no panning) my footage seem a whole lot more jittery that film movies i see on tv. Its so jittery i cant use the footage! im to scared to do the music video on 25p.
    So now i want to know, am i doing something wrong? Is the shutter speed or the way you capture in FCP got anything to do with the jittery? Or is 25p just that jittery?
    Another question. Does anybody have some tips to get a better look and feel to my music video? plug ins? or whatever?
    Thanks so much for your replies.
    Andre Meyer

    Hi Meyer,
    The reason I said your video still looks jittery is because you have not graded or used any additional adaptors on your cam. Turning on a progressive shutter alone will just make your VIDEO look like 24/25P video! The movement is greatly exaggerated! The point I was trying to make is that once you have graded your footage and if you are lucky enough to use a 35mm adaptor, much of that jitteriness (if that’s a word?!) will not be so noticeable. Remember, if it goes away completely, you are back to square one almost! Its about how acceptable you can get with the 3 components I was talking about in my previous post.
    I dont own an HVX200, but I have a V1E (not as good as the HVX200) and I find the cinema Gamma not that great as a default.. I have to tweak it quite a lot to achieve the all important contrast and saturated colours. As for your HVX, just have a play until u get a look u like. The Cinema Gammas on the Cheaper Canons are dreadful and make the cam lose all their contrast! I guess this varies a lot with the mid-priced prosumer cams?!
    You don’t need to own a 5D MkII (an ergonomic disaster in my opinion unless u have the full rail kit!) to have that 35mm DOF control. There are quite a few 35mm adaptors out there that have attachments for many types of video cameras. There are users in this forum I think that use these types of adaptors with the HVX200’s. However, such equipment is not cheap.. and of course a good quality stills lens’s are not exactly cheap either!
    So to summarise:
    1. Use a progressive frame rate 24/25P
    2. Colour Grade to film... Best bet is to use Apple Colour... this is a really good colour corrector which has various preset that’s you can tweak and work pretty good as the film look. Of course you will need to experiment to get the effect u want. Alternatively, you can use Magic Bullet Looks.. which can be use used as a Plug-in to FCP, and is like Apple Colour on Steroids! It doesn’t offer the same amount of control as Color, but has some really interesting presets that can be easily tweaked.. and the good things is, this is all done without leaving FCP.. so its quick.
    3. If you want to go the whole way and go for a 35mm adaptor.. then do your home work. Do you currently own a select of still lenses? Canon L series or Nikon Pro series? Of course u don’t need the pro lenses, but in this set up the quality of your stills lens becomes really critical! Take a look on YouTube and see the effect these adapter give, they can be quite amazing! Be prepared to spend over £2500 for the adaptor alone!
    4. And of course, remember technique when shooting like this.. these adaptors do stop down your camera, you will probably have less light to play with. When u r tracking etc, DOF is really critical and can be difficult to master at first.
    I don’t have any 35mm adapter, i try to achieve the film look by using steps 1 and 2..the result, well... its ok but often means I have to mess about with camera distances sometimes to achieve a decent DOF. Swings a roundabouts!

  • Film look and final presentation techniques

    I have a feature film that is in the final stages of editing. I recently got the Final Cut Studio package with FCP 5, Studio Pro 4, Motion, Soundtrack, etc.
    The movie was shot on DV and looks about as good as it could. I know there are a lot of 'film look' techniques out there, some of them work, some of them look terrible. Unfortunately I don't have the time to experiment at this point, so if anybody can point me in the right direction it would be appreciated.
    I also have a copy of Magic Bullet from a couple years ago, but I don't know much about the program. I'm pretty good about figuring these things out with a nudge, though.
    Thanks.

    Magic bullet does good stuff. There is a new version of that due out soon.
    Also go to www.nattress.com and look at the Film Effects filters.
    Cinelook is another route.
    Welcome to the forums, BTW.
    And it would be good if you could do a search for your topic next time, as this question comes up at least once daily, if not twice.

  • Frame blending and Film look

    Hi everyone,
    I'm editing a moutain bike video shot with a sony HDR FX1 in HD and imported as SD.
    Editing is finished and if I preview the video on my computer screen its just fine, but if viewed on a TV it has of course that artificial digital look far away from film. now, I noticed that the portions of clips that have been slowed down to 50% and used "frame blending" do look a lot better... by better I mean, they loose a bit of that digital "sharpness". I also played with gamma and colors but I think that the "frame blending" adds a sort of "softness.
    I was wondering: if I duplicate my sequence, overlap the original with it's duplicate and play abit with blur (or else?) and make it let's say 30% transparent... would that help?
    any suggestions?
    I've seen a skiing video presented on QT website shot in HD and compressed H264... and it has that perfect film look.
    Would love to know your thoughts.
    Thanks
    Ciao

    Ok,
    this is the procedure I courageously undertook:
    1. duplicate of my sequence
    2. added to the new sequence a level 4 blurr
    3. played with color and gamma levels
    4. overlapped the two sequences
    5. adgusted transparency of the copy sequence according to the different portions of clips... some may result too dark. Transparency goes from 50 to 75%
    Result: clearly a less digital look - closer to film -smooth
    Downsides: loss of luminosity - everytime I change transparency it takes about 5 hours to render and if it doesn't look how you want it, you have to add another 5 hours.
    Raises a problem: on TV it has a look and on a computer screen it has another. Consequently you have to create two separate files according to where you want to play it!
    I'm sure there is a better way to do it.

  • What Exactly Is Meant By "The Film Look"?

    I have been puzzled by this expression for the past few years.
    What IS a "Film Look"?
    I started with cine (Super 8) exactly 30 years ago, so my thoughts whenever a "film look" is mentioned dwell on jerky movement, dull images, grain and scratches!
    I am sure this is NOT what is meant - please tell me it isn't!
    Is it connected with sharper images, purer colours and smoother movement obtainable with which - DV or film?
    Ian.

    I wonder if the very coy Mr Brown is trying to get to this point:
    People who buy a consumer video camera who instantly expect their movie to look like Star Wars are struggling in vein. Inexpensive video gear allows people to express their creativity, not to get into the commercial film market. You cant compare low, or even medium level video to high end film
    A professional videographer, who shot music videos for people like Leonard Cohen on video at a time where most high end music "videos" were still be shot on film explained it to me this way: He saw the essential difference as being one of gamma, of the ranger of light and shadow. See a movie shot in 35 mm black and white and compare that to a high end video in black and white ... you will see what the difference is
    That being said, this camera man thought it was silly to try to use video to emulate motion picture film. He liked the use of video and with his exquisite lighting and use of filters, he created work so good looking you wanted to eat it.
    Most people, I think, make movies with video because it is much cheaper and more accessible than film ... they have no idea what the video really is .. they watch Star Wars on their home TV and go .. well, thats what I want.
    I have worked in the pro video world for 20 years, everything from local TV commericials to corporate video to weddings... my gear has ranged from 500 buck cameras to 15,000 cams ... and I have never tried to acheived the "film" look. My work is all about communication and video, with its clean, clear look and quick turnaround time, gives me that. I dont make "movies" nor do I have a desire to.
    Friend of mine currently makes music videos with one of the Panny high end cameras, doing everything in 24p. No denying, it looks great. Is it "film" look?
    Meet me in the balcony

  • Export Settings for Web/PC from PAL

    Hi
    I primarily work in producing video for playback on a PC or Web; usually from PAL SD and Widescreen.
    Therefore I mostly try to export to Progressive 4:3 standards but crop the source to 4:3 so that I can resize the video to standard ‘square’ dimensions (320x240, 480x360, etc).
    I normally choose the H.264 - YouTube SD preset. Change to PAL standard (which resets the frame sizes for some reason), crop to 4:3 and change the frame size back to 640 x 480. I just leave all the other settings as default and export.
    However with CS5s new preset for Vimeo I noticed that it sets the Aspect Ratio to 1:1 – Square Pixels; while the YouTube preset keeps it at 4:3. I never noticed this before as the exports always looked correct.
    Which is right, have I been doing this wrong all this time? What is the ‘best’ procedure to export from PAL video to PC and web video?
    Thanks in advance of any replies.

    Hi Harm
    Sorry to open this thread again but I'm still having problems.
    I reinstalled Premiere Pro/Media Encoder and tried downsizing to computer dimensions (320x240 - square), but I'm still getting borders.
    I have attached a screen shot showing my settings and the video output, which includes the black borders.
    The only reliable way of getting rid of the borders is to crop (4:3) on the source tab which obviously loses a small about of pixels from the left and right.
    Any idea what I'm doing wrong?

  • Converting subtitle file length from PAL to NTSC

    We're releasing a PAL version of a movie in the UK, whilst another company in the US will issue an NTSC conversion from our PAL master. The NTSC master therefore will run exactly 3.8462% slower than the PAL 25fps master, after standards conversion and speed correction.
    We'd like to be able to use our PAL spotted subtitle file for the NTSC release, but I need to know if it's possible to 'stretch' the subtitle file by the required 3.8462% in order for it to match the NTSC running time.
    I have tried a shareware app called Subtitler (by exporting the track description file and importing into Subtitler), but it does not allow me to input a stretch as a percentage - merely in frames, seconds, minutes etc, which adds the same amount to each subtitle.
    Does anybody out there know of a way to create the modifid subtitle file?

    Yes, I have already converted the original supplied .txt file, but (and as with most subtitle files it seems) I have had to tweek it myself and add a whole load more subtitles (directly in DVD Studio Pro), which are translations from Chinese to English, which were not included in the original supplied French to English file (the film is set in China and has both French and Chinese throughout!). I have also created another separate Chinese to English file in DVD Studio Pro. So you see my dilemma...
    If only Subtitler was more stable - It crashes every time I import the DVD Studio Pro Item Description file.
    A friend converted the original supplied file from PAL to NTSC using the excellent (but PC only) Subtitle Workshop.
    I have been in direct contact with the very helpful author of the shareware Subtitler app, and he is working on a revision to fix the bugs.

Maybe you are looking for