Funds management at PR level

Hi all,
My client wants to control stationary and sanitary items in their organization.So they are insisting to create material master and valuation class accrdingly.But we have recommended Funds management will help in controlling their expenditure on these items.
We have advised for budgt exceed message at PR level.Is there any prerequisites for FM at PR level.
Please help me if anybody came across same issue.
thanks
Deepa

Hi,
Which update profile in FM do you use? Some profiles treat PR as statistical values. In this case, you'll have to overwrite this definition via OF39 transaction.
Regards,
Eli

Similar Messages

Funds Management Patch Level upgrade

Hi,
We are implementing Funds Management for our client. For this we we need to upgrade patch level as it is very old. what could be the impact of it on othe modules such as FI, MM, HR etc. please sugest.

Hi,
Please provide here your SAP verison,OS version, Database etc and existing patches lavel of SAP and what patch you want for this. Because without knowing this is very difficult to say anything due to live system get impect.
Anil

Implement Budget check at SC level against Fund Management(ECC)

Hello,
We would like to implement Budget check at SC level against Fund Management(ECC) .
We are planning to use Extended classic scenario with SRM 7.0
Could please confirm that it is feasible, I know that there were some problems integrating SC and Fund Management with previous SRM version in Extended Classic Scenario..
Best regards,
Lina

Hi,
I think it is standard function and no development is required.
Regards,
Masa

Budget check at SC level against Fund Management

Hello,
We would like to implement Budget check at SC level against Fund Management(ECC) .
We are planning to use Extended classic scenario with SRM 7.0
Could please confirm that it is feasible, I know that there were some problems integrating SC and Fund Management with previous SRM version.
Best regards,
Lina

Hi,
I think it is standard function and no development is required.
Regards,
Masa

|Funds Management - relating to PR/PO

I am getting another error in Funds Management:
Posting date must be used for update of value type 000100 update profile 50
Message no. FI_E008
Diagnosis
FM areas with assignment to the update profile must have all their value types defined as 'posting date' on the ledger level when activating to period-based encumbrance tracking (PBET) on the ledger level.
Procedure
Find all the FM areas using the update profile in transaction 'OF37'.
Use transaction OF36 to ensure that all value types in the FM area(s) are using 'posting date' for the ledger that is being activated to PBET.

Hi,
It's what the system says. You have to ensure, that you don't overwrite profile 0100 in OF36 with other date, than posting date.
Regards,
Eli

Fund Management Error in Billing Document

Dear all,
We are upgrading from 4.6 C to ECC 6.0, when i am creating service order and with reference to service order i am creating Service Invoice and save it dosenot transfer to accounting bcoz of FM account assignment is incomplete.
I checked in Sales order at item level there is one field for Fund Management in Account Assignemnt but it is not active so i cannot enter any field.
Can any one plz provide some solution for the same.
Thanks & Regards,
Pankaj

You might want to check the account determination analysis in the document, menu Environment ->Analysis -> Account Determination. Usually the accounting information is greyed out because it's supposed to be determined automatically. Obviously, something is incorrect or missing in your system. Unfortunately, I'm not familiar with Fund Management config, you might want to ask in the industry-specific forum.

Authorization restriction in Funds Management

Hi all,
We have a requirement from the client to restrict budget execution in Funds management.
Business case: A user from a particular organization/agency should be able to transfer funds within his organization and should be restricted from using other agency funds.
We are planning to use authorization groups while defining the FM master data (funds, fund centers, funded programs). Later, we use these authorization groups while creating derived roles (organization/agency specific). So when the user performs activity in FMBB, he will get an authorization error if he tries to use funds that he is not authorized for.
As there could be 1000s of fund centers, maintaining them using authorization groups could be cumbersome.
I would like to know if any of you have implemented security in FM using fund center groups/ hierachy structure instead of using authorization groups.
Appreciate your suggestions and inputs ..
Thanks
Kee

Hi Kee,
I can understand your concerning about the number of funds center but in the authorization roles you will use ONLY the authorization groups not each fund center, so the maintenance will be easier.
You will not maintain each fund center in the rule, but if necessary the creation of a new authorization group or deletion of one. Because the change of one authorization group (which means more or less fund centers) will be done in master data, in the authorization part will be ok already.
The principal object will be F_FICA_FSG which is the authorization group for the funds center, so I am not sure what do you mean about maintenance, because if defined as per the business process, it will not change so much because it will be in the group level not in fund center.
Thinking about your question:
"If we follow an intelligent naming standards for fund centers and determine the hierchacal structure, can we use the fund center/fund names directly in auth objects instead of using authorization groups?"
Create authorization objects with funds center directly not using authorization groups, I did this many times in previous releases (from 3.0F to 4.0B) when I implement PSM-FM and I think that authorization groups will reduce the maintenance in an important way. The most huge maintenance is doing in this way that you are thinking about use funds center directly.
For example, if you have ?.000 funds center grouped in ?00 authorization groups and of course some of the users will have more than one authorization group and one rule will have more than one authorization group right? This will be for sure a number lower than the quantity of funds center.
Be aware that I am focusing only in authorization regarding FMBB like you mentioned in the beginning. This means authorizations to manage budget in the company, nothing else.
Therefore, it will be not so much different roles with authorizations. I am quite sure that your customer will not allow a great number of users to increase/decrease budget. You should consider this too in your analysis.
You will need to create roles in PFCG for your authorizations and of course each role will have a combination of authorization objects (reports, master data, budgeting postings, actual and commitment postings). This is a matrix that needs to be detailed and clarified with the customer needs.
I am not sure if I could help more, kindly inform if I am going in the wrong direction
Best Regards,
Vanessa Barth.

Budget check at service entry sheet release in funds management

Dear Forum,
We implemented the funds management recently we have the requirement like below
Generally in FM at the time of service Purchase order creation system will consume the budget and at the time of service entry sheet release the consumed budget in the purchase order level will adjust. Now the business requirement is that they don’t want to check the budget at service purchase order level but they want budget check at service entry sheet level.
This is the case only for service PO’s.
If anyone have same scenario please share your views.
Regards,
Ravi.

Maybe you can try having the account assignment 'U' in the service PO which will then allow you only to enter the account assignment only in the service entry sheet for budget checking.

Funds Management activation in Real Estate module

HI,
How to activate Funds Management in Real Estate module. Can any body help in this.

Hi,
I donu2019t know if I really understand what you are searchingu2026 Nevertheless the table that you can find the profit center is the VITMOA, this is linked to the condition thru the TERMTYPE of the object and the term TERMNO associated to the condition. Please consider that the posting assignment (e.g. prctr) will be assign via hierarchy since you can assign it to the contract level, a rental object level, building level, and so onu2026
Regards,
DAS

Funds Management Error (Message no. FI125)

I have just configured Funds Management ( we require Cost Element Annual Business Plan Budgeting). All is working fine including availability control) When I try to test using ME21N create PO, I get the error
"No warehouse funds center found for plant 5500/valuation class 4110."
Message no. FI125
We have not implemented MM at warehouse level.
What configuration is missing, pls help.

Hi,
You can find some information in the SAP Knowledge Warehouse for PSM, regarding to Warehouse Concepts.
There is some documentation available in this link:
<a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/f0/ca3f43260211d28a430000e829fbbd/content.htm">Funds management</a>
I am not sure if this link will work. If it does not, you can access to the online help on:
www.help.sap.com and then select:
SAP R/3 enterprise release 4.70.
   English
     SAP Library
        SAP R/3 Application Components
          Financials
            Public Sector Management
               Funds Management
                 Recording Actual and Commitment data
                   Integration with materials management
                    Integration Stock Material Procurement
In summary, you should work on any of the proposed Warehouse scenarios in order to avoid such messages.
I hope this helps.
Kind regards,
Mar

Funds Management Budgets and Hierarchies

Hi Folks
We use funds management budgets in our R3 system and import them into an FM cube using 0FI_FM_1. When I run reports including budgets the Hierarchy for Funds Centre cumulates values in subordinate nodes. The problem is that the extractor brings in the budgets at each level as a result of the way the budget is stored in R/3. Previously I knew the lowest level that budgets were stored at and targeted just that data but now the budgets may be stored at varying levels.
I either need to build an DataSource on R3 that provides the "Distributable" budget at whatever level it is stored or do I make the Key figure non cumulative.
Anyone had an similar experiences or solutions with hierarchies

hi
Eli Klovski
how to use this budget period in FM
I had read help
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/en/03/f1968109244986b0c3719d2670af08/content
but that when i to define new ledget but no total table PSGLFLEXT can use (Had Activate PSM-GEN-BUDEGT_period 1 and 2)
and if i want to define 12 AVC ,but how to control on month?
can you help me ?

Funds Management Commitment

Hi,
In funds management (BCS) in case of inventory I have activated AVC from PR level. After making PO commitment for PR get reversed and new commitment for PO get generated. but after issuing material to department, commitment for GR get reversed and new commitment for PL GL get generated. this leads to total reversal of commitment at balance sheet GL. due to this budget get opened again for new PR. to avoide this I required to block commitment through tcode FMX1. but this to be done manually every time after issuing material. I want to make it automated means commitment should be blocked automatically after issuing material. please suggest.

Hi,
I made PR for Rs. 100. In this case commitment is booked for GL say 132000 (inventory).
After that I made PO for same amount. So PR commitment get reversed and PO commitment booked for Rs. 100.
In case of GR PO commitment get reversed and commitment booked for GR entry for Rs. 100.
Then I issue that material to GL 412000, CC 190150 then GR comitment for GL 132000 get reversed and new commitment for GL 412000 get booked.
It means PR budget is again open for posting.
+100 PR
-100 PR (after making PO)
+100 PO
-100 PO (after making GR)
+100 GR
-100 GR (after issue of material)
to avoid this opening of PR budget again I need to block budget by passing manual entry through tcode FMX1to GL 132000.
I want to make this FMX1 entry automated. can we do this. please suggest.

FUNDS MANAGEMENT (FM PB Availability Control)

BUDGET CONTROL, FUNDS MANAGEMENT (Budget Control Document 1700013859). The Activity Group is PAYROLL. Getting message that states the following:
Budget Consumption 122,733.14 USD (FM PB Availability Control) less than annual budget for document item 00001.
Can someone tell me what the threshold is? (i.e. 90% expended) and can this warning message be modified from the standard SAP message to better inform departments as to what is occurring. They have not run out of funds, but have reached a threshold that needs to be monitored.

The following tolerance limits regarding payroll entries are currently configured in the system. Once the 90% level of the budget is exceeded, the system will generate one notice. After the 100% is reached, the system will repeat the notice every time an entry occurs.
90% Warning message Internal mail (only once)
100% Warning message Internal mail (repeatedly)

Funds Management Year-end Issue

For Funds Management Module year end activity, it mainly involves commitment and budget carry forward.
For a particular Fund / Fund Centre, we transferred the commitment and the budget from 2011 to 2012. However it was not distributed accordingly in 2012. From the screenshot below, you can see that the budget (Sender) had multiple levels (Fund Centres).
1.MIMOS
2.1000
    3.MM05
      4.MM0501
        5.MM050107
However, the receiver was only at the highest level which is MIMOS. Now under the budget reports, it is showing insufficient funds @ the Fund Centre level.
Please guide me on how do I redistribute Funds to the lower levels Fund Centres.
Please refer to the screenshot at: http://nazrinrizal.blogspot.com/2012/01/funds-management-fm-year-end-issue.html
Help would be very much appreciated. Thanks!

You could try out transaction FM9P for year 2012 in your test system to reconstruct the distributed values.
To me it seems that the actual budget for 2011 has only been entered for the top-level MIMOS and distributed from there (I assume you are using Former Budgeting), and thus the carryforward only considers the "actual" fund center + fund combination for which the budget was entered.
If budget would have been entered to the lowest-level fund center, you would have to run FM9Q to sum it up for the above fund center hierarchy levels.

Funds Management Activation

Hi Experts,
We are at Version EA -PS - 600 - SAP Enterprise Extension Public Services ,. We have activated EA-PS .Component .
While in IMG , try to activate , system throwing following error message :
Activate Global Funds Management Functions (PSM-FM) - System ,Function is not possible; application IS-PS is not active
Message no. FI292
Diagnosis
Activating the Funds Management Government functions at client level requires the cross-client activation of the application.
System Response
The Funds Management functions are not activated.
Procedure
First activate the cross-client IS-PS application by using transaction FIBF under Settings -> Identification -> SAP Applications.
If we go and see above Path : IS -PS , check box is in NOT CHANGABLE .
Please sugges us to activate the same.
Regards,
Sujana

Hi Osvaldo,
I am facing the same problem.
I was working on: Define Planning Layout
Public Sector Management >> Funds Management Government >> Budget Control System (BCS) >> Budgeting >> Budget Entry >> Planning >> Define Planning Layout
The msg being: function is not possible funds management is not active
As above, I tried to run under SE38: RFFM_ACTIVATE_BCSETS.
The msg being:
Transport request "IDSK900213" contains no incomplete structures
Transport request "IDSK900213" contains no incomplete enhanncements
Activation of BC Set EA-PS-AKH terminated
Activation of BC Set EA-PS-IMG terminated
Activation of BC Set EA-PS-MENU terminated
Iam using ECC 6 Version. I would be highly obliged if you could suggest me on this.
Thanking in Advance,
Raghav.

Funds management at PR level

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for