Hello, RAW snaps too dark in Lightroom.

Hello,
I made a snap with D-Lichting automatic in JPG and in RAW format at the same time.
When I look to the snaps in Photoshop I remark a difference in histogram. Both snaps have the same wave length, not the same frequencies. The red and blue colors’ are a higher in RAW; the green colour is higher in JPG!
Both pictures look to be the same, lighting seems to be ok.
The same RAW picture opened in Lightroom is dark, under-exposed you should think.
Could I get some advice to get solved this problem?
Many thanks in advance
Marianne

Dear Rob,
ADL is off and I made again some snaps. RAW ( NEF) and JPEG are taken at the SAME time.
When I have a look tot snaps in Lightroom they look ok. When I have imported them in Lightroom they are still too dark = over exposed. What could be happen?
vriendelijke groet!
Marianne
Van: Rob Cole
Verzonden: woensdag 29 oktober 2014 13:41
Aan: Marianne Matthys
Onderwerp: Hello, RAW snaps too dark in Lightroom.
Hello, RAW snaps too dark in Lightroom.
created by Rob Cole <https://forums.adobe.com/people/areohbee> in Photoshop Lightroom - View the full discussion <https://forums.adobe.com/message/6878930#6878930>

Similar Messages

Raw of s100fs with 400%DR too dark in Lightroom

When i open in Lightroom a RAW-File of my s100fs shot at 400% dynamic range it appears too dark. Are there fixed Corrections I can apply?
Thanks.
In german:
raw von s100fs mit 400%DR in Lightroom
Hallo
wenn ich in Adobe Lightroom ein RAW-Foto mit 400% HDR öffne sind diese zu dunkel. Bisher wurschtelte ich dann halt rum bis es mir gefiehl oder benutzte einfach die "Auto" -Korrektur von Lightroom.
Gibts da irgendwelchen fixen Wertkorrekturen die man benutzen könnte?
Habe alle meine RAWs in DNG umgewandelt falls das relevant ist.
Dank und Gruß!

I read the article already but missed that part...thanks.
For those having the same Question:
Quote fom Dpreview:
"You can also shoot extended dynamic range images in RAW, but third-party converters won't understand that the image has been intentionally under-exposed and will produce a very dark image. You need to play extensively with tone curves, highlight recovery and fill light (or equivalent), to get the correct results from third-party software. Once you've established these correction settings, you should be able to apply them to all extended dynamic range images, though."
Thanks to all of you!

Aperture RAW processing too dark?

I recently imported a set of pictures of my daughter into my Aperture library. Everything went smoothly and looked great with the previews looking like I expected. I even went through each picture one by one and flagged the ones I wanted to edit. After editing a few I went back again and looked at the unedited pictures to see if there were any more i wanted to flag and edit. Upon doing this, I noticed that after Aperture finished "Loading..." a couple pictures, they automatically got significantly darker. A couple of them to the point that adjusting "Exposure" to the highest setting makes it barely acceptable for use. On one picture I noticed got even darker after the 2nd "Loading..." process.
As a test I exported the originals to my desktop, loaded them in Lightroom, and voila, the pictures are back to their "non-dark" selves. Therefore, I believe this is an Aperture issue and I have no idea why re-"Loading..." the RAW originals would make an image even darker. I've attempted to reprocess the originals but it pops up that none of the images need reprocessing.
Any suggestions?

Are you using any in-camera post-exposure processing?
(Added:) Have a look at Keith Barkley's User Tip regarding setting your camera to get the best exposure in RAW for Aperture.
Message was edited by: Kirby Krieger

Aperture D600 Raw Files too dark?

Is anyone else seeing that their Nikon D600 raw files stink in Aperture? I realize that Apple backwards engineers Raw support but if I look at a file from my D600 on Aperture and Capture NX2, the difference is 10-fold. I can see detail in the shadows in the NX2 conversion and nothing but black in the Aperture conversion. I have never seen this much of a disparity and I have used well over a dozen different DSLR's. I am curious if anyone else is seeing this? I mean in one image I can see a staircase in the NX2 conversion and nothing but black in Aperture?

"Neutral" on the camera means nothing. Those control the JPEG previews only and do not affect RAW files.
Yes I know. However, that JPEG preview is what you see on the back of the camera so having all parameters set to as little post-processing as possible will help give you a more accurate preview of the Raw file. I will give you some more background... Our first DSLR was a Canon 10D. This was before Aperture v1.0. We moved to a 20D, a 30D, a 40D, switched to Nikon and used a D80, 90, 300, 300s, 7000, and 600. I have photographers whose files I process that included Fuji (yikes!), Canon 7D, 5D, & 5DMII. Haven't had a Sony camera yet. I started with Aperture v1 and am now using the latest Aperture release. I have a very good understanding of the process.
@ funkcanna, thanks. I haven't used a D4 but it is good to hear I am not going crazy! Yes, the files just go to crap when you click on one. I too hope this is not a sign of things to come... I really don't like Lightroom but for now, I have no choice.

PSE7/ACR 5.6 issue with Canon 7D raw images too dark - solution?

Whenever shooting both jpeg and raw images with my Canon 7D and uploading to PSE7 (where I use ACR 5.6 to convert raw) the raw thumbnails are a stop darker than the jpegs. When converting a raw 7D image, the exposure needs to be increased by a stop (this needs to be done whether or not jpegs are also shot). This phenomena does not occur with my Canon 50D using the same raw converter - the jpeg and raw image display the same exposure and raw images do not need the exposure increased.
I have noticed in the raw converter on the Camera Calibration tab that - for the 50D - the Camera Profile contains ACR 4.6, Adobe Standard, and the Canon camera profiles, whereas for the 7D the Camera Profile only has the Adobe Standard and the camera profiles. The converter does say 7D at the top of the screen, however, so the converter recognizes the 7D. Is there a 7D Camera Profile that needs to somehow be configured/uploaded, etc.? ( I did run CameraProfiles.exe)
The 50D and 7D are set up the same, so this is not an ALO or some other camera setup issue - I have done extensive testing in this area. Also, Canon DPP displays the thumbnails (raw & jpeg) and the raw conversion exposure correctly, which tells me that this issue has something to do with ACR 5.6.
Is this a setup issue in 5.6? Or, do I need to upgrade to PSE8 and ACR 5.7 or 6.1 to get around this?
Thanks for your assistance.
Ed

Update:
I installed PSE9, which comes with ACR 6.1, and the issue was not resolved. So, I downloaded ACR 6.2 - same problem: EOS 7D raw images (thumbnails and when opened in raw converter) are 1 stop under-exposed. As stated above, Canon's DPP doesn't exhibit this problem, nor does FastStone Image Viewer, only ACR. Anyone else having this issue? Thanks for any help.
Ed

Hello, I have a Windows 7 Pc where Lightroom 5 is on installed. When I open a photo using " verkenner" I see a good coloured photo. When I open a photo via Lightroom 5, the photo will be too dark. This gives difficluties during shaping the photograph. C

Hello,
I have a Windows 7 Pc where Lightroom 5 is on installed.
When I open a photo using " verkenner" I see a good coloured photo.
When I open a photo via Lightroom 5, the photo will be too dark. This gives difficulties during shaping the photograph. Can someone help me to solve this problem?
Kind Regards,
Marianne

Into the Develop module Not all the sliders in the Basic Panel are at 0.
Temperature ° is on 5600
Colourtint is on + 30
Balans: slider in the middle
History panel:
Balans gespitste tinten -3 0
Balans gespitste tinten -3 3

Lightroom 5 Prints are too Dark - We Need a Fix Now!

Hi
Am using LR 5.7
I import images in RAW and convert to DNG.
hen I export as a JPG and print, the prints are fine.
When I print from Lightroom's Print Module, the prints come out too dark with a significant loss of detail in shadow.
Adobe.... This has been a major problem since version LR 1... It is High time you fixed it! I have wasted dozens of sheets of paper due to this problem!!
My screen is a 24" calibrated IPS ASUS monitor.
Windows 7, 64Bit.
Many Thanks
Kind Rgds
Rob

Robert Mack wrote:
Hi Butch
Do a google search for Lightroom Prints too Dark and you will find dozens of posts for all versions of LR. It is a common problem.
There are many hardware and software issues that according to a "Google search" would appear as a universal problem, while in reality, they are far from widespread. I can assure you that Lightroom would not be as popular as it is today if this were indeed a universal problem.
Robert Mack wrote:
I also upload images from LR to a Print Lab and the prints are fine.
Yes, but is your lab making adjustments to the images during the print process? Many do. My labs do not, they simply print the files as they are submitted. Many consumer and "pro"-sumer labs apply auto correction to image files. Most of these labs do not even inform you that they are applying those adjustments.
Robert Mack wrote:
The problem is using the LR Print Module to print on a printer attached to my PC.
I have the same problem with an Epson R1900 and a Mitsubishi
Yes ... and if you are applying the same settings/instructions in Lr for printing, the problem will persist regardless of the brand of printer used.
Robert Mack wrote:
LR had ICM managed by Printer. The Printer has ICM managed by Host.
I did try this using the printer's ICM profile within LR. Still too dark.
This could be part of your problem ... if Lightroom is set for the printer to handle color management by the printer ... and your printer is set to be color managed by the host (i.e. - Lightroom) ... then in actuality, the images you are printing from Lightroom are not being color managed at all. Ideally, you should have Lightroom set to manage printing when you have the printer driver set to "managed by Host" ...
Robert Mack wrote:
No windows apps are adding any additional processing in the printing process as far as I am aware of. The only exposure correction / adjustment was done in LR..... I am choosing the same printer paper profiles in all methods of printing.
You may not be making settings in your Windows apps ... but if your printer driver is set to make auto adjustments by default when printing from these apps could explain the difference.
Additionally, many folks think they are "calibrating" their monitors when they are not doing so as it pertains to printing. Accurate color is only one phase. While your colors may appear true, the monitor brightness may be too much to accurately render a near match of what a printed version of the image would be reproduced.
As trshaner pointed out, not only do you need to render a close approximation of color ... but also overall brightness. Most monitors/displays, even very expensive and high resolution displays, are extremely bright at default settings for rendering a close match for printed material. That overall brightness level should fall within 90 to 120 cd/m2 and be adjusted as needed for your specific viewing environment and papers and printer inks combinations.

Photos from Lightroom print too dark

I have saved my photos in RAW format and imported them into Lightroom. I have then made changes to them and exported them from Lightroom as JPEG files. However, when I go to a printing kiosk and get the photos printed, they are all darker than what they displayed in Lightroom. What do I need to do to be able to print accepable photos?

It really isn't that difficult to print and get good results. But the key is to make sure the monitor is set properly. Those who are really into printing strongly advocate using a hardware monitor calibration device. I agree, but haven't invested in one. Over the years I have worked with the controls on my monitor and software tools to match the monitor to my printer. And having done so I have found that images that I send to a lab match very well, too.
Since you have never printed before, or are just getting started, you really need to take time to get that monitor adjusted to match the results you are getting. Photolabs are pretty consistent. And if your images are too dark you must at the very least reduce the brightness of your monitor. Color matching can be a whole additional challenge. If you want to print, whether on your own printer or through a lab, getting your monitor set up properly is critical.

Lightroom 5.4 JPG too dark. Faulthy export.

I updated lightroom 5.3 to 5.4. After this when i export a RAW (NEF) file to JPG, the JPG is too dark . It should be the same. Please help.

This is a duplicate post, original is here:
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1448794
(granted, this one has a better title )

HT3964 Hello, my isight camer is not working properly, i was using photo booth and suddenly the image was black or too dark and also ichat and facetime are too dark as well, please helpme out i can not find any solution.

Hello, my isight camer is not working properly, i was using photo booth and suddenly the image was black or too dark and also ichat and facetime are too dark as well, please helpme out i can not find any solution.

read this and see if it helps: http://support.apple.com/kb/ht2090

Lightroom/leopard/epsom 4000 prints too dark

Using LR2.1 with leopard and an epson 4000 calibrated screen results in prints which are at least one stop too dark as compared to display. Proper profiles being used and no color management selected. A fix?????????

What is the brightness of your screen?

Exported Jpeg's when sent to photo lab print too dark

I have had consistent results with exported jpeg images that look fine on my monitor (as raw files)and show in the histogram in lightroom 2.5 as the highlights just starting to clip as printing too dark when sent to a photo lab in SRGB. Is this a fault of my monitor? I have calibrated the monitor, a Dell S2409W, using charts on the website at http://www.normankoren.com/makingfineprints1A.html but this still happens. Will darkening the Monitor help or will the images still clip at the same point? I have been able to send a second image with the exposure and or brightness boosted a bit and they print brighter, but this is a pain. What is the best way to correct this so that I can see the same image as I get back from the lab?

hello henrykipson,
you said that you want starting an professional laboratory business,i can talking about this because i had a laboratory until some years ago .i hope that you made some artistic study,so it's more easy for you to learn this topic.you must study,an pass an examination for take an artigianal licence that allow you to open this activity ,the licence given you the opportunity to work either for sale photografic material either to shoot and developing,one time that you had pass this examination you must gone to the police autority and inform these of your business (is under police control.because you work with chemical material,and also because you had a reservate people information,and they must given you their assent.)after all you can start to buy a good developer and print machine beyond to have a dark room.for manual print.you must decided if do you want work in black and white or color.You can do both but is better to specialize by one of them ,like you want.
Remember from the digital events many people print his image at home,you must deciding maybe is better to work with a professional photographer,that can given you more work.itsn't easy.you must have a good preparation because ,they are more exigent.The good results depend also from the quality of your works.a good machine,good chemical product,good upkeep,of your laboratory.(in italy this is the procedure,i think also in other country,because is a ticklish question licence.)I hope that this my little explanation are useful to you.Good luck .
cheers alessandra minotti

Images too dark on external display

Hello,
I use Lightroom on my (Lenovo) notebook. Because of the small screen size, I tried using it with an external (Samsung) display. However, when I open Lightroom on the external display, all the images suddenly seem way too dark. It is the case that this display is generally too dark, because when I view the same picture in a photo viewer or a browser it is not too dark. See for example this screenshot. On the left hand you see an image (export from Lightroom) in my browser, on the right hand the same image in Lightroom. You can clearly see it is much darker. When I view both images on the screen of the notebook itself, there is no difference between them.
Actually, when I move the Lightroom window from the notebook display to the external display, you can clearly see Lightroom adjusting the images from light to dark.
Does anyone know what causes this, and how I can prevent Lightroom from showing the images too dark?
Thanks!

I guess you misunderstood my problem. It's not only that images on the external display are way darker than on the notebook, but also that on the external display images in Lightroom are much darker than when I view the same image on the same display in a photo viewer or a browser. In the screenshot pictured above both the light and the dark version of the image are on the same external display.
However, in the meantime I found a solution. Changing the Windows Color System device profile to a non-WCS-profile did the trick: Photos appear as black, gray rectangles | Lightroom | Windows
Thanks anyway for trying to help.

Canon 1D MkIV images too dark

Hi there
Having a problem here. The RAW images from my Canon 1D Mark IV come in a stop too dark!
When I open them, they lookfine; a second later they switch to a too-dark version. I am using Camera Standard, and no other adjustments.
It's not just visual: the histogram of the opened file is shifter a stop to the left compared to the same phoito's histogram on the camera.
Any ideas? This is a major issue for me since I rely on both the 1D MkIV and Lightroom to make a living...
Many thanks
Michael
www.michaelwillems.ca

Hi M, the question is simple, but the answer is complex. I'll provide an example to try to illustrate. The attached image is a downsampled version of a JPEG from the 1D Mark IV. It's a test picture of a color chart. I've drawn a red circle around the 2nd gray patch in the 4th row. When I take a picture with the 1D Mark IV zoomed into this patch at this exposure, I get a histogram all the way to the right. And indeed, when I open the file in any image editor (e.g., Photoshop, or DPP), and use a color picker / eyedropper to sample the values, the average value of that patch is (255,255,255). So this is like in your example when you say you look at the histogram (e.g., in DPP or on the camera LCD) and it's all the way to the right. In other words, the histogram effectively says this patch is clipped to the max value.
However, if we look at the average raw values in this example for that patch, they are actually (on an 8-bit scale) about (72, 209, 187). In other words, the actual camera-recorded raw values are still pretty far away from clipping to 255. (I should also mention that the camera-recorded raw values aren't white-balanced, which is why the green value is much higher than the red & blue values, above.)
So you can see there is a discrepancy between the camera-produced JPEG and the actual raw values. In this example, the camera histogram and JPEG values indicate a clipped patch at (255,255,255). If you are going by that histogram, then you would conclude reasonably that this patch is overexposed and clipped -- when actually it is not.
More generally, there are always discrepancies / differences between camera-recorded raw values and the histogram shown on the back of the camera (as well as the JPEGs rendered by the camera). This isn't error. This is preference. Cameras and software apply "preset" exposure and tone curve processing (and possibly sharpening, noise reduction, etc.), and the histograms you see on the back of the camera are based on those presets (not the actual raw data). This is why your histogram on the camera will change depending on your in-camera settings of white balance, tone curve, contrast, etc.
There is nothing wrong with the 1D Mark IV. Many Canon DSLRs currently leave a lot of highlight headroom, i.e., when metering they will be conservative on the highlight side, and expose a little less. As I recall (don't have my full notes in front of me), the 1D IV spot meters about 3.5 stops below the actual clipping point. In other words, if I had spot-metered that gray patch in the attached example, and started with the meter needle in the middle, I could then increase the exposure by about 3.5 stops before I actually clip that patch. That's quite a lot.
To summarize: you have to be careful when interpreting camera histograms. In many cases, it is easy to interpret that something is clipped when in fact it is not. If you see a histogram that appears bunched up to the right, the tendency is to decrease the exposure, and therefore make the histogram move to the left (so you aren't overexposing). In reality it is possible the original exposure was fine (without overexposure), and all that's happened is that now the image is even more underexposed.

Printed pictures are too dark

My pictures printed from Iphoto 5 are too dark, I have tried my home printer, kodak, and Fuji. The results are the identical. However, when I import the same pictures in Photoshop CS they print just fine.
I am now having the Aperture 2.1.1 "trial" and i have the same exact problem with my home printer. In addition, some of the pictures (not all of them)are not sharp, they seem out of focus. I have exported the same pictures to my desktop and printed them with "Graphic Converter". The pictures are much better, but i still get a few which seem to be out of focus. I then took the same desktop images and used Photoshop Elements 6 ( also on trial)to print them. Photoshop is printing the pictures correctly (photoshop elements 6 does not have a printing profile for Mac's and the printing is managed by the printer's HP software). I must be missing a printer setting when using the Apple programs. My Aperture colorsync setting is set to "HP D7300 premium plus".I have a 1.8 Ghz G5, OSX 10.4.11, and an HP D7360 printer. Can anyone give me an idea of what i am doing wrong?

Hello Donna,
I use the printer settings:
roll paper
premium semigloss photo paper /250)
color: color
advanced settings: 1440dpi with no other boxes checked
I turn off color management
in LR the Profile I made for this special paper/printer is selected.
It's the latest 9800 printer driver, downloaded just a few days ago.
I came across the endless threads on maybe the same subject only some hours ago. (
Sean McCormack, "Printing Problems in Lightroom" #70, 26 Feb 2007 6:19 pm) Tried the trick with chosing the 9800 as default printer, but it didn't help. The printer settings tell me the profile used is: *systemstandard* (that's german: some sort of default (standard) of the system. Maybe it's the same as the "generic RGB profile" mentioned, but I'm not sure.
I also print from LR on a G5 to an Epson Stylus Pro 3800 via USB with absolutely no problems.
Here I want to print from Lightroom on an Intel Duo Core to a networked printer, the 9800.
I'd LOVE first of all to get a somehow *canonical* statement that printing on a networked printer from Lightroom is possible, Yes or No. (As I said before, it is no problem from PS CS3)
If the common experience is, that one cannot print from LR to a networked (Epson pro) printer, then I'll surely not go on reading tons of discussions to find the needle in the hay.
@ Donna: I'd be very grateful for any suggestions!
@ Andreas: certainly the printer driver on the networked Mac G4 the Epson 9800 is attached to is older than the one on my Intel Mac. Is that what you mean? I'll try to fix that.
@ dyp: the profile shown in the printer setting is: *systemstandard* (system default, in german). Looked up Color Sync in the library, I find the profiles folder, but nothing to chose any profile as my default. Where do you do that in Color Sync?
Thank you all a lot for helping!
Johann

Hello, RAW snaps too dark in Lightroom.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for