HR Time evaluation

Hi ,
I have a doubt in time evaluation in HR.
How to integrate time evaluation with payroll without using schema. please provide step by step process.
Cheers
Kallen

Check out the links:
http://www.insightcp.com/res_22.htm
http://www.planetsap.com/hr_time_main_page.htm
Pl Awars the points if it helps you .
Thanks

Similar Messages

Time Evaluation Re Run in Mid Month & Mid Mont Initialization !

Hi There,
i was trying to run Time evaluation for the period 01.04.2011 to 31/12/2011.
from April, that is 01.04.4011 to 30.06.2011 Time evaluation was good, now time evaluation has to run from 01.07.2011 but time evaluation has repeated from 12.06.2011 to 11.07.2011 as Initialization period 07/2011, and the same scenario is repeated for the rest of the year..all periods are initiated on 12th of each month from 6th month that is 12.06.2011.
i was been trying to rectify this issue but was not bale to solve it, could any one please look in to it and let me know how to solve it?
your help is appreciated.
Thanks
Kumar

Can you please regenerate Period Parameters for 2011 year in T-Code for OG00 for period parameter 01 and then give the hire date in the field Forced Recalculation as of run in PT60 and run the time evaluation.
Best Regards,

Use of Time Evaluation to generate Absence Quota

Hi,
We are planning to use time evaluation to generate absence quota. At the moment we are using RPTQTA00 report to generate Absence Quota. We have negative time management and since, the project has already gone live i have very limited scope to change the basic settings for example we do not have any employee subgroup to identify part time employees, PT & FT are in one employee sub-groups. We have only one ESG & PSG for time recording, time quota etc. The base entitlement is defined for the FT employees and it is reduced propertionately based on the employement percentage in IT0007. Now we are going to adopt a change in design, and planning to have specific work-schedule for PT employees. In that case, we will not have the scope to maintain %age in IT0007 for part time employees but exact no of working hours will be used. It means that system will treat the PT emploees as FT while generating absence quota and output the FT absence entitlement. As i said earlier we can not differentiate PT employees from FT employees based on ESG or PSG, i can not create a separate quota selection rule for part time employees. Hence, we are moving from running RPTQTA00 report to time evaluation for absence quota generation purpose.
Now can anybody please help finding a alternate solution for the above, if it is possible to do it through report RPTQTA00 or we have to adopt the time evaluation. In case we are going to generate absence quota through time evaluation, can we only generate absence quota and skip anything that is related to payroll.
Any comments/suggestion/advise will be very helpful to us.
Thanks.
Sujit

We are not able to generate absence quota for part-time employees as when we do that, system is treating PT employees as FT employees and the FT base entitlement is referred while calculating absence quota. i can not define separate absence entitlement for PT employees as we have only one ESG and PSG, and based on this quota selection group is defined. The QUOMO feature is defined based on work contract - employee sub-group (there is no separate emp sub-group for PT employees) - Pay Scale Group. We are having this problem as we have specific work schedule for PT employees now (Ex. we create 3 days work schedule with 15 hours: 4.5,4.5, 6 hours) and we are not maintaining employement percentage for them. So system is treating PT employee as FT employee with 100% employement percentage. Please let me know if you need any specific info to understand my issue.
Thank you so much for the response.

Quota updation upon accural in no time evalution(TMSTA=0)

Dear Team,
We went go live on one and half year back and using no time evaluation for all employee in info type 7.
At the time of financial year starting we will generate Absence quotas say CL, PL through RPTQTA00,
Entitlement is 12 days,Hence April month it self, record will be created in info type 2006.
In mid of month/year Joining employee, based on prorate base entitlement will be updated in info type 2006.
Now Client/My requirement is:
He does" t want to give total entitlement in april it self. every month 1 leave needs to updated. (12 days entitlement for CL, hence prorate base 1 day in April once we run in Payroll, 2 days (11) in May, 3 days (11+1) in june.. so on and so fourth...
How we can configure this. Please help me on this.
Regards,
MVR

Hi,
Try the following setting.
SPRO -> IMG -> Time Management -> Time Data Recording and Administration -> Managing Time Accounts Using Attendance/Absence Quotas -> Calculating Absence Entitlements -> Rules for Generating Absence Quotas -> Set Base Entitlements
In this select your Quota type and give ENTITLEMENT CONSTANT as 1.
RELATED TO PERIOD as Accrual Period
SPRO -> IMG -> Time Management -> Time Data Recording and Administration -> Managing Time Accounts Using Attendance/Absence Quotas -> Calculating Absence Entitlements -> Rules for Generating Absence Quotas -> Define Generation Rules for Quota Type Selection
In this, double click your Quota Type then Goto Accrual Period Tab and select Month
Now, the Program RPTQTA00 has to be run run every month with suitable Data Selection Period
Thanks and Regards
Kiran

Time Evalution & PDC recalculation

Dear Experts!
I have to face an weird problem. My scenario is as below:
1. I create a new Time Type to calculate the working date of employee in every month. My time wage type will replace an existed wage type in system, because it's configuration is not correct.
2. After checking on Dev, QAS, the value of Earn Leave ( generated monthly) is CORRECT, we move this TR to PRD.
And after moving it to PRD, there are a lot of employee re-run PT60 from Go Live Date. I don't know why.
Could you please guide me the way to know which recalculation date in Time Evaluation, and How SAP decide the date to retro Time Evaluation in PT60? I just guess the field PDC recalculation in IT 3 ( I read F1 of this field), but now I'm mixed about this information.
And you know, because we change the Earned Leave in Time ( I run PT60) eg: Earned Leave for Feb-2010 will be modified, of course the value of Time Wage Type will be changed. The date Earliest MD change in IT3 is NOT Changed. But the Payroll for this guy is retro from Mar-2010.
Can you please help me clear the way to re-run Time Evaluation & Payroll.
Regards!
Woody.

Hi Woody,
Please note the below Points carefully, which may help you to solve your issue:
Note -
Retro Runs are based on Infotype, If you change any Infotype related to Time / Payroll, then the system automatically maintain the "Earliest MD Change" date in IT 0003.
For IT 0003
1) When you change employee data that is relevant to payroll, the system stores the earliest date from which the master data change is valid. This date can be a future date after the last payroll run
2) The system deletes the date in the Earliest master data change field after successful completion of the payroll run.
The earliest recalculation date for time evaluation is also queried when master data and time data that is relevant to retroactive accounting is changed.
For Payroll Controll Record
Earliest retroactive accounting period
1) Retroactive accounting in payroll can begin on the start date of this period at the earliest.
2) If changes relevant for retroactive accounting have been made before this date, the system does not take these into account in either current or future retroactive accounting. However, retroactive accounting is initiated up to this period.
3) If the earliest personal retroactive accounting date (from IT 0003) differs from the earliest retroactive accounting period, then it will be backdated to the later date.
Comments:
1) May be the Time Wage Type Change (related to Payroll) might have triggred the Retro Payroll, and once it retro run happens the "the system delets the date in the Earliest Master Data Change Field", that is why you are unable to find that field with values.
2) Check the "Earliest Retroactive Accounting Period" in Control Record (Tcode PA03), so that you will get some idea. why it has happend.
3) While determining the Retro, the system checks the IT0003, Control Record, it will take the date whichever is backdated date.
Hope this helps.
Regards
Venu

Error in time evaluation

Dear All,
time evaluation is throwing an error msg "No entry in table T001P for key" for only one employee in the time evaluation display log.
Its happening in the initialization part in time evaluation. for example,
If i run the time evaluation for the month of 01.01.2009 to 24.02.2009. error message throwing on the initialization of 01.02.2009.
I have checked all the groupings in table V_001P_all. All are correct.
Where should i do the correction. Pls
Br.
Manjula

Hi Sikindar,
I have checked all grouping in V_T001P_All every think is correct,
And how can i check with grouping with dates??
This employee getting error message only in the initilation part in time evaluation log.
example if i run the time evaluation from 01.01.2009 to 01.03.2009 . time evaluation running only from 01.01.2009 to 31.01.2009 . its not moving to next month.
if i run time evaluation from 01.02.2009 to 01.03.2009 then its running only 01.02.2009 to 28.02.2009 its not moving to next month.
In the initialization in the next month im getting error message (no entry in table T001P for key)
Thnaks.
Manju

Time Evaluation Re Run

Hi There,
i was trying to run Time evaluation for the period 01.04.2011 to 31/12/2011.
from April, that is 01.04.4011 to 30.06.2011 Time evaluation was good, now time evaluation has to run from 01.07.2011 but time evaluation has repeated from 12.06.2011 to 11.07.2011 as Initialization period 07/2011, and the same scenario is repeated for the rest of the year..all periods are initiated on 12th of each month from 6th month that is 12.06.2011.
i was been trying to rectify this issue but was not bale to solve it, could any one please look in to it and let me know how to solve it?
your help is appreciated.
Thanks
Kumar

Hi,
thanks for reply but till now i have not yet customized the schema or any pcr, so it is pretty much standard TM04 schema, could you plz elaborate your answer?
Thanks.
Kumar

Time evaluation:Regeneration of leaves for past with new slabs.

Hi Gurus
Find below our requirement and advice accordingly
1.Employees annual leave entitlement slabs are bifurcated based on length of service as below
Tenure with Company      Eligibility/Month
1. Probation        1.5 Days
2. 0-3 Years                           2 Days
3. >3-6 Years     2.08 Days
4. >6-10 Years     2.16 Days
5. >10-20 Years     2.33 Days
6. >20 Years Above     2.50 Days
2.Probationary /regular employee bifurcation is done at employee subgroup level
Emp Subgroups     Employee
1. 01 - 10            Regular
2. 11 - 20                          Probationary
3. We use time evaluation schema ZM01 copy of TM01.
4. On hiring, probationary will be assigned with employee subgroups 01-10 via hire action.
5. On confirmation, probationary will be changed with employee subgroups 11-20.
6. For probationary, system will generate monthly accruals of 1.5/month days till confirmation.
7. After confirmation system will start generate 2 days/month.
8. We have a requirement that after confirmation action system should re generate the leaves from date of joining as per the employee after probation.
Illustration:-
1. Employee joined under probation on 01.06.2011.
2. His monthly annual leave accrual till 31.12.2011 will be 9days i.e. (1.5 days * 6 months)
3. On running confirmation action system should regenerate his annual leave from his date of joining with the new slabs and it should be 12 days i.e. (2 days * 6 months).
Is it feasible in time evaluation. Pls advice.
Thanks in advance, Thanesh

Hi
I have a couple of queries on this scenario.
We can do it on the base of base entitlement but there is action dependency then its better to write PCR.
First Check action type --> Then give the quota as 1.50 or 2 days as per req the nupdate the quota.
Here before writing the PCR we need to take care of one thing that once employee changes the action it could not check the old action. Say for Ex when i am checking the probation and changed the Probation to permenant then it should not check the Probation again. So we need to put a counter check here.
So i am writing a logic like first will check Probation an
For Ex : We take Probation Action type as 01 and Permenant Action type as 02
ZT05 Personnel Calculation Rule ZT05
      " HRS?1      Decision op.     HRS
        " <
          " OUTWPMASSN Action Type
            " 01
              " OUTWPMASSN Action Type
                " 02
                    HRS=1      Set
                    ADDDB1230 Add to day balance
                    HRS=1.50   Set
                    ADDDB1234 Add to day balance
              " OUTWPMASSN Action Type
                " 02
                    HRS=2      Set
                    ADDDB1234 Add to day balance
Please create Time Type 1230 and 1234 at T555A.
Hope this helps you. All the best. Let me know how it worked.
Reg,
Srini

Time Evaluation quota not transferred

Hi,
For a couple of employees when i run time evaluation, quota type 91 gets generated and transferred but quota type 93 does not. It remains 0.
On analyzing the logs, i found that for these employees, there is an entry in table QTTRANS with the quota amount that was supposed to be transferred.
According to doc on help.sap.com, {Table QTTRANS indicates the status of the transfer pool for each day. The cumulated entitlements are indicated until they have been transferred to the *Absence Quotas *infotype (2006) or until the entitlement has expired.}
This means the quota amount for quota type 93 is being generated, but is not being transferred to infotype 2006. Also, the transfer time in the rule is not being shown on ad-hoc basis for these two employees for this particular Quota type. The other quota type 91 which is evaluated on exactly the same basis is working fine.
I have checked the transfer period in config and it is monthly. Also, for other employees in the same grouping PSG, ESG, quota is being generated and transferred correctly.
Quota of 2.5 should be transferred on the last day of every month.
Further, analysis of QTTRANS over a period of time reveals the following results:
Jan05 Quota transferred : 0 ;Table QTTRANS: 2.5
Feb05 Quota transferred : 2.5 ;Table QTTRANS: 2.5
Mar05 Quota transferred : 2.5 ;Table QTTRANS: 5.0
Apr05 Quota transferred : 7.5 ;Table QTTRANS: 2.5
May05 Quota transferred : 10 ;Table QTTRANS: 2.5
Jun05 Quota transferred : 10 ;Table QTTRANS: 5.0
Jul05 Quota transferred : 10 ;Table QTTRANS: 7.5
Aug05 Quota transferred : 17.5 ;Table QTTRANS: 2.5
Sep05 Quota transferred : 20 ;Table QTTRANS: 2.5
Oct05 Quota transferred : 20 ;Table QTTRANS: 5.0
Nov05 Quota transferred : 25 ;Table QTTRANS: 2.5
Dec05 Quota transferred : 25 ;Table QTTRANS: 5.0
For the entire year, it should have generated and transferred 30 but actually it is 25.
I would be very grateful if anyone can point out the cause of this issue.
Thank you,
Regards,
Zubair

HI,
You can view in IT2006 accumulated Quota means current year Quota + carry over Quota. In Time cluster tables "QTTRANS" you can view Quota transfer value.
Refer T.code: Pt66 for Time cluster tables.

Time evaluation generate check out entry

Dear Gurus,
How can we generate Check out entries thru Time evaluation?
The sales employees come to office in the morning, they punch in and leave for sales activity. They don't get overtime, but pay / absence quota deducted if they don't check in in the system.
While running Time evaluation, I am getting error in TE03 (delimiting error). I hv tried creating second entry using TF00. Its not working. Has anybody any solution for this?
Regards,
Vijay

Hi Gurus,
I am rephrasing my requirements. have 2 queries,
1. Sales Employees make only Clock In entries. System should generate the clock out entry or should not throw any error message. System should consider total working time from daily work schedule.
   - TE30 function is generated the entry in TEVEN table based on planned end time, but we need to create the entry in IT2012 otherwise, while processing next days entry, it generates error.
   - Will TF00 create an entry in Time Events IT2051 ? IF yes, how can I tweak TF00 rule to generate Time out entry.
2. General Staff working hours need to be calculated from Shift Start even if they come early. Max working time is 12 hours with 4hrs from start of end of Shift period
   - If shift start is 7AM, I have defining Start tolerance as 6AM to 7:05AM, but still the system is considering the Clock In time for hours worked.
I have to write this condition. How to write ?
   If Clock-in Time < Start Time
      Then   TIP->From = Start Time
I believe it has to be put in TL10 after rounding the Check in & check outs.. so as to update table TIP,
Please suggest,
Regards,
Vijay

Not able to generate the absence quota WITHOUT Time Evaluation

Hi ALL,
When i try to generate the absences quota for employees without time evaluation using program RPTQTA00, I am not able to generate it.
And i am getting "E You have not selected any generation rules".
Kindly if any one come across this issue please throw some light and do a favour.
thanks all

Hi,
Pls check the follwing tables if u have made correct assignments
v_t559l
v_554s
v_556c
Check Quoma Feature
Check what status u selected in IT7
Check if ur using correct Schema
If ur Using RPTQTA00 then use No Generation,and if ur using PT60/RPTIME00 change it to Increase.
Check if u have maintained correct quota groupings.
Revert back if its not solved
Regards

Absence quota 31 cant be accrued by time evaluation

Hi
while i run tim evaluation i get error like absence quota 31 cant be accrued by time evaluation,i configured generation rules & also written rule to update quota 31.Any suggestions where i went wrong??how to correct this error??
Thanks&best regds
Shaila

Hi
Actually i had written sub schema for this..bcoz this URL is eligible for those employees who are Cash processing officer & also based on personnel area we have to check wheter particular employee is Cash processing officer or nt if yes then only update 1day URL to 2006 IT, if the employee is working on Public holiday..for updating i had written this PCR..ZMN1 Public holiday indicator(timetype), 31 is my quota group.
HRS=1
varstprsnt
N
Y
HRS=DZMN1
ADDDBZMN1
UPDTQ31

Absence quota generation with PCR in Time Evaluation

Dear All,
I am generation absence quota Annual leave = 50 through PT60- ZM04. Its daily calculation and transfered at the month end.
The quota entitlement is 30 days per year.
I have written this pcr. Have configured a time type too. but not sure why its not generating any quota.
The time type I have configured is:
Time Type: 0097
Save as day balance - No Formation
Save as period balance - 1
Store for time accounts - 1
Have assigned the time type 0097 in Base entitlement for Absence quota generation as Day Balance and even in generation rules.
Have placed the PCR with ACTIO Z003 before CUMBT fucntion.
The PCR Z003 is:
000010 D HRS?0
000020 *
000030 = D OUTAQTYP
000040 = **
000050 = 50 Z GCY ZQTY
PCR ZQTY is:
000010 D OUTWPMOLGA
000020 **
000030 99 HRS=FR50C ADDDB0097Z ADDDB0097 HRS=D0097
I didnt mention anywhere in configuration or PCR that its 30 days per year.
Do I need to do this?
Have I missed out anything, please help me.
Thanks & regards,
Majid

Hi,
This you can do through config also without using PCR.
Base entitlement is 30 for calender year. Selection rule- Accrual period is daily and transfer time is time evaluation period.
Use appropriate rounding rule in selection rule.
Rgds,
Lata

Absence Quota Carry Forward without Time Evaluation (TQTR)

Dear Experts,
The client requires the left over from 2 quota types to be carry forward to 1 quota type next years.
e.g. from Annual Leave and Casual Leave is to be carry fowarded to following year's Annual Leave. As well as the total quota for Annual Leaves cannot exceed 60.
Now the problem is, if we were using Time Evaluation here, i know i couldve done it through TQTR, which woudve been very convinient. But we arnt generating quotas through the rule, neither are using TM00 or TM04.
Your help and input in this regard would be highly appreciated.
Thanks
S.N.

http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-35168
for #1..assuming your quota follows calendar year 01/01 to 12/31. Refer to above link for more details. The idea is to do the following 3 steps in order to generate a carry forward quota bank.
1. Setup a quota type "17" in the quota configuration and attach a daily balance time type to this quota type. E.g ZQ17
2. Write a custom PCR...to read remaining balance for current year's quota ban on 12/31..and store this in a different time type. ZREM
3. in the same PCR...on 01/01 (next day)...read the previous days balance in ZREM using HRS=LZREM...and assign this balance to ZQ17...this will generate you quota bank for 17 for the next year.
for #2...
instead of update program locking the previous years quota banks...its better for update program to create a IT2013 adjustment to 0 out the balance of the previous years quota. This can be an LSMW upload. You can get remaining balances of current quota banks for all applicable employees and then load IT2013...with reduce entitlement as radio button option.

Time Evaluation : Operation/Function to update quota entitlement

Hi,
within time evaluation quato entitlements are determined.
Due to changes legislation, under particluar circumstancens the entitlement of the quota need to be updated.
I've build all 'circumstances' in a time evaluation rule and now all what needs to be done, is to perform a deduction an a specific quuta type. The number of hours to be deducted is already stored in a time wage type (as part of the new calculation rules).
Which operation or function can be used to update the quota entitlement with the number of hours stored in the time wage type.
Thanks,
Wilfred.

Hi,
if was looking at this operation but couldn't manage to get things working as I would like.
Is there a link available with more detailed information on this operation besides the information available in SAP (PDSY)?
Thanks,
Wilfred.

Absence Quota creation during Time evaluation - Orgnaisational Assg change

Hello Experts,
I have one emplyee for whom the Transfer action has been run - his personal subarea has been changed from 1633 to 1654
obviously the ps grouping for time quota type changed form 35 to 40.
so function QUOTA is creating different quota for this employee than what there exist right now for infotype 2006.
so during time evaluation below error is comming.
    Error entry no. 83 Error when creating absence quota
    A complex application error has occurred
Kindly let me know how to overcome this error.
Thanks Jay

The reason 'error no. 83' occurs in RPTIME00 is because function QUOTA
is trying to generate a quota type which does not exist for the employee
on a specific day. It must have existed some time before. Normally,
the function QUOTA displays an error message concerning the
non-existing quota types. In this case, the 'error no. 83' can only
occur in the following scenarios:
1. If you deleted a quota type that was to be generated
2. If an employee has an organizational reassignment to a personnel
   subarea or employee subgroup which have different groupings for quota
   types and for these groupings the 'old' quota type does not exist.
Function QUOTA checks to determine if the quota types to be generated
are valid. If the quota type is not valid anymore (see reason 2) then
you will get a warning message.
"the problem in these situations was the following:
RPTIME00 is trying to generate a quota for a validity interval
(defined in table T559D) during which the employee belongs to two
different groupings, due to the transfer.
In your case the quota type should be generated with a validity interval
that begins before the employee's organizational change.
Unfortunately, for the time between the validity begin up to the
transfer of the employee there is no entry in table T556A for this quota
type.
or check the config of this quota running Rptquota_check in se38
Therefore, it is possible to solve the problem by defining a dummy
quota type for the 'old' groupings of the employee (table T556A).

HR Time evaluation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for