Important Hints on Color Management under Windows XP!!

After struggling for several hours, I have learned a couple important tidbits I have not seen elsewhere in these forums. As much confusion as I read in here about color management and color issues, this might be quite important to some.
If you want to skip the story, jump down to the last few lines of this entry for the summary.
I recently built a new computer, and when I copied my catalog over to the new drive and opened it, all my files as viewed in Lightroom had a distinctly "yellow" tinge, as compared to their exported JPEG brethren (as viewed in Windows Explorer thumbnail view). I realized, aha, I haven't set up color management on the new system yet, so this is to be expected. Lightroom internally uses a different color space than XP, so without some color management they won't match.
Well, after going around and around setting up monitor profiles and so forth, I was getting nowhere. Nothing was changing the appearance of the yellowish images in Lightroom!
Abandoning the effort for the time being, I switched to other tasks, and imported an old catalog to see if I wanted any of the old work before I deleted it. Then i did a double take... my color problem was fixed! Could color profile info be stored with catalogs? Surely not.
So I started experimenting. Removed all monitor profiles. No change. Switched back to the newer catalog. The colors changed. Put the monitor profile back. No change. Restart Lightroom. No change. Click load catalog, and then pick the same catalog I'm on. No change. Load the old catalog, the colors changed. After several rounds of experimentation, I am now sure of the veracity of this new discovery.
Here is the moral of this story, in two bullets:
(1) Some color management changes in Windows XP are only apparent in Lightroom when you load a catalog. Even restarting Lightroom, or restarting Windows isn't enough. Only loading a catalog makes the changes show up.
(2) You can't simply reload the catalog you are on. You have to load a different catalog, so Lightroom offers to Relaunch, in order to get the changes.
I hope this helps someone.
Vaughn
http://vaughnsphotoart.com

>I recently built a new computer, and when I copied my catalog over to the new drive and opened it, all my files as viewed in Lightroom had a distinctly "yellow" tinge, as compared to their exported JPEG brethren (as viewed in Windows Explorer thumbnail view). I realized, aha, I haven't set up color management on the new system yet, so this is to be expected. Lightroom internally uses a different color space than XP, so without some color management they won't match.
Since Windows Explorer is not managed, they will NEVER match, even if you use sRGB in your exported jpegs as you should. This is even true if you calibrate your monitor. You can only get a complete match when your monitor's primaries correspond precisely to sRGB, which basically never happens. In unmanaged apps, calibration only impacts the contrast (i.e. gamma and blackpoint) of the monitor. This is why the use of managed apps is so important.
>So I started experimenting. Removed all monitor profiles. No change. Switched back to the newer catalog. The colors changed. Put the monitor profile back. No change. Restart Lightroom. No change. Click load catalog, and then pick the same catalog I'm on. No change. Load the old catalog, the colors changed. After several rounds of experimentation, I am now sure of the veracity of this new discovery.
This is weird. Lightroom for me always picks up on a new monitor profile after a restart. I don't need to load a different catalog. Definitely not normal and unexpected behavior.
>How could a monitor profile do this? Monitor profiles effect the image as it's sent to the monitor, so how could LR even "know" what monitor profile is selected? This still isn't making sense to me.
Actually it does have to know. The way color management is implemented on windows (and Mac OS too), is that apps are responsible for doing the translation to the monitor profile. The OS just tells the app about the monitor profile and the app can deal with it as it pleases. This way the app can either use a system library such as ColorSync or the windows equivalent, or its own profile conversion code such as all Adobe Apps do. This is why unmanaged apps are not suddenly magically corrected. The only thing that gets corrected for unmanaged apps is the grey response because this is handled by a LUT (lookup table) in the videocard.

Similar Messages

  • Horrible Color Management in Windows 8.1 and PhotoshopCC (solution)

    Perhaps you what happened to me. Windows 8.1 and in my case a laptop Asus Intel Core I5.
    CC install the brand new Photoshop (or other) and color management is Horrible ... no ... the following.
    The black and white is sepia ... And the colors are nothing real touch all settings and no result ... I almost went crazy. I think the solution is going to cost more people. And when they discover is a great relief.
    We go to the control panel
    The first will .... Color Management.
    The second will .... Advanced Options.
    And choose "Adobe RGB 1998".
    And thus solved
    En español. Seguir este link. http://rapulsel.blogspot.com.es/2013/12/gestion-de-color-horrible-en-windows-81.html

    Rapulsel, color-management cannot successfully be taught on a forum in a "for dummies" fashion.  It's been tried and usually it leads to trouble.
    Color-management is non-trivial, and it's the kind of thing that can make you want to run away from it screaming before the light finally goes on and you get your head around it.
    However, after that you will understand it and you will find you can solve your color-management problems and produce imagery and work products that are predictable.  You results will be second to none.
    The problem you are having most likely is that someone (the manufacturer?) associated a color profile with your display that does NOT actually describe the color response of your display.  It happens.  And it consistently screws things up when it happens.
    A first step you can take to undo that, before going and learning how to make a color profile that more precisely describes your display, is this:
    Open WIndows' Color Management panel, in the Devices tab choose [ ] Use my settings for this device,
    [Add...] the sRGB IEC61966-2.1 color profile.
    If it is not marked as (default), select it and press the [Set as Default Profile] button.
    This sets your default profile to a common default set of color characteristics that many displays are designed to implement.
    This may make your colors more tolerable, and they'll match that displayed e.g., by Internet Explorer.
    Then go off and do some reading.  It's well worth taking the time and spending the effort to learn how color-management works.  I advise reading about it in multiple places online, always keeping in mind that some (maybe a lot of) people who don't really know much more than you do try to teach it to others.  Understand that there aren't really good "just do this" or "set it and forget it" answers, and that just because something is published online or even in a book doesn't make it gospel worthy of blind faith.  Read multiple sources, and try to distill out the essence of what they are saying.
    Good luck.
    -Noel

  • Color management under Arch

    Hey all,
    At my job we do photo and slide scanning.  Photo scanning isn't such a big deal but slide scanning definitely is.  I am kind of fed up with Windows and I would like to migrate to Arch since I love it for my laptop and it has been exceedingly stable so far.
    Color management is a constant issue (slides are a new market and we need to work more on the color management), and I was wondering what the best bets are to get started on that.  In the Wiki it mentions that LCDs need to be handled in a special way.  The video card is too old for the Catalyst driver so I can't use the amdcccle tool to adjust color (which I did on my laptop using some color charts and other test images online and I have been pleased with the results).   I am halfway familiar with xgamma but I guess I'm looking for advice as well, since a rough test with xgamma didn't yield the best results (I have a quick installation set up to test it out on another partition for now).  Also what about some of the hardware color calibration tools out there?  Do any of those work in Linux?
    These might be slightly noobish questions but I really appreciate the help.

    Hey all,
    At my job we do photo and slide scanning.  Photo scanning isn't such a big deal but slide scanning definitely is.  I am kind of fed up with Windows and I would like to migrate to Arch since I love it for my laptop and it has been exceedingly stable so far.
    Color management is a constant issue (slides are a new market and we need to work more on the color management), and I was wondering what the best bets are to get started on that.  In the Wiki it mentions that LCDs need to be handled in a special way.  The video card is too old for the Catalyst driver so I can't use the amdcccle tool to adjust color (which I did on my laptop using some color charts and other test images online and I have been pleased with the results).   I am halfway familiar with xgamma but I guess I'm looking for advice as well, since a rough test with xgamma didn't yield the best results (I have a quick installation set up to test it out on another partition for now).  Also what about some of the hardware color calibration tools out there?  Do any of those work in Linux?
    These might be slightly noobish questions but I really appreciate the help.

  • How to import folders into itunes 11 under windows 8?

    I had to reinstall itunes and have lost the media data.
    All music is in a new folder and I would like to import the folder with all the subfolders and music files.
    But I don't find a tool in itunes 11 (under Windows 8) to import a folder.
    I can only import multiple files if they are in one folder - that will take forever ...

    Thanks for this answer. I didn't trust my self to muck-around with the seettings, no matter how basic they sounded.
    I'm doing the suggestion now. It's coverting everything for iTunes while I type this.
    (I thought Apple had gotten snobby about it, phew! )

  • Trouble importing photos into Elements 8 under Windows 7

    Elements 8 is rejecting jpeg photos I am trying to import from SD card or DVD. The photos were taken with different cameras, and ones I've imported from successfully before. It labels the files as "corrupted", or "organizer doesn't recognize this file format" or other strange messages. I've successfully  imported these files into Picassa, and Windows explorer - they are plain jpegs.

    So right after posting the question, I decided to try to first import into the file system and then import from the file system, and that worked. But its a pain because it changes my workflow.
    A possible workaround: You could use Windows Live Photo Gallery to download into your folders; the WLPG downloader is pretty good (WLPG is the version you download from Microsoft, not the one built in to Vista).  Then you could use the Organizer's File > Watch Folder feature to automatically import new photos that get added to your folders by the downloader.
    Do you use lightroom? Do you recommend it?
    I don't use Lightroom, but it has a very good reputation.  I know some other posters here use it.

  • Safari crashes when using the dialog box to import/save files, in facebook under windows 7

    I've encountered the following errors in some PCs, running Safari 5.1.7 in MS-Windows 7 Pro:
    Safari crashes when using the dialog box to import/save files. One doesn't have to actually upload or download any file, the mere invocation of the relevant dialog box brings down all open Safari windows after a couple of seconds.
    Errors displayed in the Event Log are:
    Όνομα ελαττωματικής εφαρμογής Safari.exe, έκδοση 5.34.57.2, χρονική σήμανση 0x4f982b5e
    Όνομα ελαττωματικής λειτουργικής μονάδας CoreGraphics.dll, έκδοση 1.87.0.0, χρονική σήμανση 0x4f9739a0
    Κωδικός εξαίρεσης: 0x40000015
    Μετατόπιση σφάλματος: 0x0013a762
    Αναγνωριστικό ελαττωματικής διεργασίας: 0x17f4
    Χρόνος έναρξης ελαττωματικής εφαρμογής: 0x01cded6b09576023
    Διαδρομή ελαττωματικής εφαρμογής: C:\Program Files\Safari\Safari.exe
    Διαδρομή ελλατωματικής λειτουργικής μονάδας:C:\Program Files\Safari\Apple Application Support\CoreGraphics.dll
    Αναγνωριστικό αναφοράς:ebe64ac9-595e-11e2-a977-0016356671d1
    System
    Provider
    [ Name]
    Application Error
    EventID
    1000
    [ Qualifiers]
    0
    Level
    2
    Task
    100
    Keywords
    0x80000000000000
    TimeCreated
    [ SystemTime]
    2013-01-08T06:45:00.000000000Z
    EventRecordID
    95609
    Channel
    Application
    Computer
    computername
    Security
    EventData
    Safari.exe
    5.34.57.2
    4f982b5e
    CoreGraphics.dll
    1.87.0.0
    4f9739a0
    40000015
    0013a762
    17f4
    01cded6b09576023
    C:\Program Files\Safari\Safari.exe
    C:\Program Files\Safari\Apple Application Support\CoreGraphics.dll
    ebe64ac9-595e-11e2-a977-0016356671d1
    and
    Ελαττωματικός κάδος (bucket) 2970527469, τύπος 1
    Όνομα συμβάντος: APPCRASH
    Απόκριση: Δεν υπάρχει
    Αναγνωριστικό Cab: 0
    Υπογραφή προβλήματος:
    P1: Safari.exe
    P2: 5.34.57.2
    P3: 4f982b5e
    P4: CoreGraphics.dll
    P5: 1.87.0.0
    P6: 4f9739a0
    P7: 40000015
    P8: 0013a762
    P9:
    P10:
    Συνημμένα αρχεία:
    C:\Users\username\AppData\Local\Temp\WER51A.tmp.WERInternalMetadata.xml
    Αυτά τα αρχεία μπορεί να είναι διαθέσιμα εδώ:
    C:\Users\username\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\WER\ReportArchive\AppCrash_Saf ari.exe_e273f639ef3d86d52c9d8e15dd2b42dce3e78061_1f86213d
    Σύμβολο ανάλυσης:
    Επανέλεγχος για λύση: 0
    Αναγνωριστικό αναφοράς: ebe64ac9-595e-11e2-a977-0016356671d1
    Κατάσταση αναφοράς: 0
    +
    System
    Provider
    [ Name]
    Windows Error Reporting
    EventID
    1001
    [ Qualifiers]
    0
    Level
    4
    Task
    0
    Keywords
    0x80000000000000
    TimeCreated
    [ SystemTime]
    2013-01-08T06:45:10.000000000Z
    EventRecordID
    95610
    Channel
    Application
    Computer
    computername
    Security
    EventData
    2970527469
    1
    APPCRASH
    Δεν υπάρχει
    0
    Safari.exe
    5.34.57.2
    4f982b5e
    CoreGraphics.dll
    1.87.0.0
    4f9739a0
    40000015
    0013a762
    C:\Users\username\AppData\Local\Temp\WER51A.tmp.WERInternalMetadata.xml
    C:\Users\username\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\WER\ReportArchive\AppCrash_Saf ari.exe_e273f639ef3d86d52c9d8e15dd2b42dce3e78061_1f86213d
    0
    ebe64ac9-595e-11e2-a977-0016356671d1
    0
    I have tried in-installing safari but it seems not to help. I have tried installing it to a third, newly installed pc and come to the same result.
    All PCs are fully up-to-date as it regards Microsoft and Apple patches. Any ideas as to why this might happen?

    Still having the same problem. Ever the optimist, I submit the following info.
    Error window screenshot can be found here: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/22465174/safari/safari_fail_01.JPG
    Enent log entry can be found here: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/22465174/safari/safari_fail_02.txt
    Version info can be found here: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/22465174/safari/safari_fail_03.JPG

  • Keyboard Manager (under Windows XP) spamming System Debug Output

    When running Windows XP, the Boot Camp keyboard manager (kbdmgr.exe) spams the system debug output every 500 ms with a message like "0.620690".
    This is inconvenient for a developer. Often I need to check out debug output in order to accomplish some task. But as soon as I start a Debug viewer application it gets flooded with that kbdmgr messages. That is more an annoyance than a problem.
    Is there a way to tell Keyboard Manager to start and remain silent?

    Yes, running the 2.1 drivers. KbdMgr.exe says it is 2.0.2.44 (exe version/build number) and Boot Camp systray app says it is 2.1 Build 210A12. Took another screenshot showing these version numbers:
    http://picasaweb.google.com/rholdorf/BootCamp/photo#5219317221537472034
    Yes, you are right. I am filtering out those messages. The sad side is that I have to do that once each boot. And I did that so many times that I got really annoyed.

  • Patch Management under Windows networking envirionment

    Hello.  I'm new to the community.
    Is there a utility to install flash player to workstations from a centralized location?
    Our problem is that users do not have administrative rights to update their flash player.
    Any information would be a great help.

    There are probably many commercial applications that provide that utility for enterprise systems. Generically not just for windows.
    I suspect you can also do it with standard Microsoft services/products.
    There are probably free versions.

  • Max time management under Windows XP

    1) Where can I download MXM?
    2) Which another utilities good for power saving batteries?

    Hi there,
    could you please tell me what this max time managment software is? I googled for it and couldnt find anything, so please tell eventually the name of the software manufacturer of this specific software.
    Otherwise I would suggest you using the toshiba powersaver because the powersaving settings/features can be set very detailed..
    Greets

  • Confused about Color Management in CS5 (Photos appearing differently in all other programs)

    I recently noticed this and it's been driving me crazy; when I view photos in Photoshop CS5 they appear significantly lighter/more washed out than when viewed in other programs like Zoombrowser, Digital Photo Professional or just in a regular Windows folder using Filmstrip mode (Windows XP).  When opening the same photo in both CS5 and Zoombrowser and switching back and forth between the two windows the difference is very apparent...for example, one of the photos I compared was of a person in a black shirt -- in CS5 (lighter/washed out) the folds in the shirt were very obvious, but in Zoombrowser (darker, more contrast/saturation) the folds were nearly invisible and it looked like just solid black.  Now, after messing around with the settings in both Photoshop and in Zoombrowser I've found a few ways to get the photos to look the same in the two programs; one way gives them both the lighter/more washed out appearance and another way gives them both the darker appearance with more contrast and saturation.  My problem is that I'm not sure which view is accurate.
    I use a NEC MultiSync LCD1990SXi monitor with SpectraView II calibration software and calibrate it every 2 weeks using these calibration settings (screenshot): http://img52.imageshack.us/img52/8826/settingsx.jpg
    In the SpectraView II Software under Preferences there's an option that says "Set as Windows Color Management System Monitor Profile - Automatically selects and associates the generated ICC monitor profile with the Color Management System (CMS)."  This option is checked.  Also, when I open the Windows' Color Management window there's only one option displayed, which is "LCD1990SXi #######" (the ####### represents my monitor's serial number).
    I assume the above settings are all correct so far, but I'm not sure about the rest.
    Here are my current default Color Settings in CS5 (screenshot): http://img97.imageshack.us/img97/666/photoshopcolorsettings.jpg
    Changing these settings around doesn't seem to make the photo appear much different.  However, when I go to Edit -> Assign Profile, then click off of "Working RGB: sRGB IEC61966-2.1" and instead click Profile and select "LCD1990SXi ####### 2011-06-21 18-30 D65 2.20" from the drop-down menu, the picture becomes darker with more contrast and saturation and matches the picture in Zoombrowser.  Also, if I select "Adobe RGB (1998)" from the drop-down menu it's very similar in terms of increased darkness and contrast but the saturation is higher than with the LCD1990SXi setting.  Another way I've found to make the image equally dark with increased contrast and saturation is to go to View -> Proof Setup -> Custom and then click the drop-down menu next to "Device to Simulate" and select "LCD1990SXi ####### 2011-06-21 18-30 D65 2.20" again.
    Alternatively, to make both images equally light and washed out I can go to Zoombrowser -> Tools -> Preferences and check the box next to "Color Management: Adjust colors of images using monitor profile."  This makes the image in Zoombrowser appear just like it does in CS5 by default.
    Like I said, I'm confused as to which setting is the accurate one (I'm new to Color Management in general so I apologize for my ignorance on the subject).
    It would seem that assigning the LCD1990SXi profile in CS5 would be the correct choice in order to match the monitor calibration given the name of the profile but the "Adjust colors of images using monitor profile" option in Zoombrowser sounds like it would do the same thing as well.  Also, I've read that Photoshop is a color managed software whereas Zoombrowser and Windows Picture and Fax Viewer are not which makes me think that maybe the lighter/washed out version seen in Photoshop is correct.  So which version (light or dark) is the accurate one that I should use to view and edit my photos?  Thanks in advance for any help or info.

    Sorry for the late reply;
    But before we go there or make any assumptions, it's important for
    you to determine whether you're seeing consistent color in your
    color-managed applications and only inconsistent color in those that are
    not color-managed.  For that you'll need to do a little research to see
    if the applications in which you're seeing darker colors have
    color-management capability (and whether it is enabled).
    I opened the same picture in 7 different applications and found that the 6 of the 7 displayed the photo equally dark with equally high contrast when compared to the 7th application (CS5).  The other 6 applications were Zoombrowser EX, Digital Photo Professional, Windows Picture and Fax Viewer, Quicktime PictureViewer, Microsoft Office Picture Manager and Firefox.
    However, at least two of these programs offer color management preferences and, when used, display the photo (from what I can tell) exactly the same as Photoshop CS5's default settings.  The two programs are two Canon programs: Zoombrowser EX and Digital Photo Professional.  Here's the setting that needs to be selected in Zoombrowser in order to match up with CS5 (circled in red):
    And here's the setting in Digital Photo Professional that needs to be selected in order to match up with CS5 (again, circled in red):
    *Note: When the option above "Monitor Profile" is selected ("Use the OS settings") the image is displayed exactly the same as when the monitor profile is selected.  It's only when sRGB is selected that it goes back to the default darker, more contrasty version.
    So with the red-circled options selected, all three programs (CS5, ZB, DPP) display the images the same way; lighter and more washed out.  What I'm still having trouble understanding is if that ligher, more washed out display is the accurate one or not...I've read several tutorials for all three programs which only make things more confusing.  One of the tutorials says to always use sRGB if you want accurate results and *never* to use Monitor Profile and another says that, if you're using a calibrated monitor, you should always select Monitor Profile under the color management settings...so I'm still lost, unfortunately.
    What I also don't understand is why, when the monitor profile is selected in CS5, the image is displayed in the dark and contrasty way that the other programs display it as by default but when the monitor profile is selected in Digitial Photo Professional it displays it in the lighter, more washed out way that CS5 displays it using CS5's default settings (sRGB).  Why would selecting the monitor profile in DPP display the photo the same way as when sRGB is selected in Photoshop?  And vice versa...why would selecting the monitor profile in Photoshop display the photo the same way as when sRGB is selected in DPP?
    I feel like I'm missing something obvious here...which I probably am.  Again, I'm very new to this stuff so pardon my ignorance on the topic.
    By the way, I find that the way that the non-color managed programs (Windows Picture and Fax Viewer et al.) display the photos is more aesthetically pleasing to the eye than the duller, more washed out display that CS5 gives the photos, but ultimately what I want to see in these programs (especially PS5 where I'll be doing the editing) is the accurate representation of the actual photo itself...i.e. what it's supposed to look like and not a darker (or lighter) variant of it.
    So just to reiterate my questions:
    Why does selecting Monitor Profile under the color management settings in DPP give the same display results as the default sRGB profile in CS5 and vice versa?  (CS5 with monitor profile selected having the same display results as DPP with the sRGB profile selected)
    When using CS5 with it's default color management settings (sRGB), using DPP with the Monitor Profile selected, and using Zoombrowser EX with "Adjust color of images using monitor profile" selected this results in all three programs displaying the same lighter, washed-out images...is this lighter, more washed-out display of the images shown in these three programs the accurate one?
    I noticed when opening an image in Firefox it had the same darker, contrasty look as the other non-color managed applications had.  Assuming that the CS5 default settings are accurate, does this mean that if I edit a photo in CS5, save it, and upload it to the internet that other people who are viewing that image online will see it differently than how it's supposed to look (i.e. in a non-color-managed way?)  If so, this would seem to indicate that they'd see a less-than-flattering version of the photo since if their browser naturally displays images as darker and more contrasty and I added more darkness and contrast to the image in CS5, they'd be seeing a version of the photo that's far too dark and probably wouldn't look very good.  Is this something I have to worry about as well?
    I apologize for the lengthy post; I do tend to be a bit OCD about these things...it's a habit I picked up once I realized I'd been improperly editing photos on an  incorrectly calibrated monitor for years and all that time and effort had been spent editing photos in a certain way that looked good on my incorrectly calibrated monitor but looked like crap on everyone else's screen, so the length and detail of this post comes from a desire to not repeat similar mistakes by editing photos the wrong way all over again.  Again, thanks in advance for all the help, it's greatly appreciated!

  • DISABLING COLOR MANAGEMENT & PAPER SIZE

    After some struggling and considerable surfing the internet, I managed to get my HP Deskjet printer output producing the proper colors.
    However I still have an ongoing problem with paper size and orientation.
    I have Photoshop Elements 7 running under Windows XP.
    Under the current set up, under "Page Setup" in the print dialog box, I can select 6x4 borderless and landscape orientation, but the printer will still print it in portrait orientation on 8.5 x 11" paper. I have seen many times where I have selected "Landscape" in Photoshop but the image in the preview windows shows Portrait. Or the preview is oriented portrait but the picture within the preview is a cropped landscape version of the image. Or the preview picture is landscape but the landscape-portrait button shows portrait. Obviously there are portrait images and portrait printings, but Photoshop seems to get them confused and wants to print a landscape image in a portrait orientation.
    If I hit "Print" and then go to "Preferences" in the Windows printer dialog box, if I select "landscape borderless 6x4", it will print a 6x4 image on letter sized paper, ignoring the orientation and paper size I selected. And if I re-enter the Windows printer dialog box, will show "letter" again as the current paper size, although I had not selected that previously.
    I have "Photoshop Elements manages colors" selected, but then a warning message appears asking if I have disabled color management in the printer preferences dialog. I cannot find any way to disable color management in Windows XP or in Photoshop. (If this has anything to do with my problem.)
    Help!
    Leo Foss, Ottawa, Canada

    Messages that have been replied to can't be edited--to preserve the integrity of the conversation, otherwise replies might become totally irrelevant or people might change what they say based on replies, instead of just replying further down.
    Some times it is better to reply rather than edit, at least for those of us who are reading the forum via e-mail for a more permanent and easily-searchable version of the conversations, we don't see the edits, so an e-mail reply might not address the edited message.  In your case, since the problem went away, it was just as well you replied to your own message, since the situation had changed.

  • HP Envy 5530 - Color Management

        HP Envy 5530 Printer     How do I disable Color Management?     In order to use the Color Management options in Adobe PS Elements I need to be able to disable Color Management in the printer preferences dialog.     When I go to "Advanced Document Settings" under "Color Management" there are only two options:Color Smart/sRGB or Adobe RGB.     I've tried every "trick" I can think of to get acceptable results from this printer and this appears to be my last hope.     Can you help? Thanks

    Thanks for responding.   According to HP: "For HP printers, changing these settings (Color Management Settings in the OS) will not affect output. This is because the printer only supports ICC color management in Windows through the application (not the operating system) in order to reduce the possibility of over-processing images."   The option I'm looking for is: "Managed by application essentially turns off printer driver-based color management. Selecting this option tells the printer that incoming color is already color-managed, and the driver is not to do any color conversions to the image data." - Quote from  HP Consumer Support   Apparently, this is not possible on the HP Envy 5530 - neither is getting "lab quality photos" as you advertise.  If the quality of the prints were acceptable, particularly in black and white, I wouldn't need to be looking for a 'fix'.   Finding out which HP printers have the "managed by application" feature has proven to be difficult. Thanks for addressing my problem. Best Regards

  • No Color Management will activate ColorSync?

    Dear all,
    I'm trying to print out the profiling target via Photoshop CS4. As usual, I made sure my target is Untagged; under print preview I choose "No Color Management"; Under Epson Printer Driver, I choose "No Color Adjustment" with the correct settings for that specific paper. After I print out the target and waited for 48 hrs, then I start to scan my sheets and creat a profile with it. But when I compare the custom made profile to the generic profile, it is almost half of the size smaller. I've tried with different types of paper, profiling software (ProfileMaker, i1Match, MonacoProfiler, Pulse) and printers including 2880, 4880 and 9880. They all came out the same way. I've been told that the ColorSync is activated by Photoshop even I've already selected "No Color Management" under Print Preview and ColorSync will automatically assign the default paper profile for that printer. Please can someone tells me is there any solution for this issue?
    My settings:
    Intel based MacPro
    OSX 10.5.8 with the latest Update
    ColorSync (The latest version)
    Photoshop CS4 with the latest Update
    Epson Printer (2880, 4880, 9880) with the latest driver
    Thanks
    Aaron

    My testing would seem to suggest that the problem arises just after CS4 sends the target to the driver. What I have found, and it was also stated on other forums, was that if I assign a profile of "generic RGB" and set the colorsync default space to "generic RGB" I get a target sent to the Epson driver that goes thru a NULL profile conversion and thus unchanged. Turning color management off in the driver then prints the target with output looking like I expected. All of this seems to me to suggest that colorsync (Apple) is the issue. This would also seem to be the thoughts of others on this forum.
    So... My question to Adobe, who should have far more pull with Apple than I, is what is being done to resolve this issue and that when something is sent to the driver with "NO COLOR MANAGEMENT" it truly means ZERO color management in the workflow? I understand that this issue will never be experienced by casual users of the product but it is affecting most of the professional / higher end users.
    John
    If you had really bothered to read all the forum threads here and elsewhere, you would be aware that old drivers or bad installs of drivers is the problem here that causes the double profiling with Apple new printing path.
    My question to you is what do you expect Adobe or Apple to do about this when most all current SL drivers for current printers work correctly? Whose fault is it if the printer manufactures choose not to support new OSs for there old legacy printers?
    You have a lots of choices or workarounds to print correct color.
    Use old or other OSs, drivers, that support your old printer.
    Use workarounds that some of us have come up with.
    Print with applications that use the old print path.
    Purchase new printers with drivers that support the new OS.
    Complain to Epson if that is your printer of choice.

  • Disabling color management in canon driver

    Hello
    Can anyone tell me how to disable Color Management in the Printer Driver Dialogue Box for Canon (ip4000) printer?
    Other AI CS4 users must have needed to do this, in accordance with the instructions in the Color management print window when printing in AICS4, as otherwise the colors just dont work when printing.
    As most AI users will know the guidance says "Let Illustrator determine colors", and "dont forget to disable color management in printer driver dialogue box". How do you do that then?
    I have no idea how to find the Canon printer driver dialogue box, and Canon did not seem to know what I was talking about when I phoned them - they said contact Apple or Adobe.
    Grateful for any any advice.

    I don't think it is stupid at all. Even home or small office printers nowadays have the capacity to turn their own colour management on and off. That does not necessarily result in implementing custom profiles though. It is just saying "don't try and match the colours by yourself" basically (although probably a bit more sophisticated in the driver's kitchen).
    As for doing it on a Canon printer (make sure you follow the next steps with Illustrator closed so it can apply to all pictures you will print) :
    - Open the Printing Preferences control panel of your printer,
    - In the Color/Intensity section, select "Manual" and click on "Set...",
    - Check that all colour adjustment sliders are at 0,
    - Go to the "Matching" tab,
    - In the "Color correction" drop box menu, select "None",
    - Close all dialog boxes and you're done.
    It has made a huge difference on my prints with a Canon ip3600 printer. They were way too reddish before, now they are as close as they can be to what I want - provided I don't have nor need any calibration hardware to make highly precise colour calibration end to end.

  • *Please* Apple, fix Safari color-management

    Hey,
    I was very happy with the SL update and following 10.6.2 regarding color management under OS X.
    The problem is that Safari's own color management is broken. It reverts any untagged content to Monitor RGB. This is a huge problem on wide gamut monitors as they'll render over saturated colors (almost neon-like).
    Apple should follow Mozilla's steps and see what they did with Firefox 3.6. It manages all colored content (whether it's images or CSS colors) and reverts everything to the ICC monitor profile you set on your preferences.
    I cannot rely on Safari (or Chrome for that matter) anymore.
    I know this issue is well-known and was reported before, but Apple has to fix this.
    -F

    HI,
    Best to put a bug in Apple's ear...
    From the Safari Menu Bar click Safari/Report Bugs to Apple.
    They will not respond but developers do read the reports.
    Carolyn

Maybe you are looking for

  • Why doesn't the dictionary spell colour correctly?

    I'm English, I bought my iPhone in England, it's set to English (British) But it STILL tells me there is no U in colour or rumor or honor oar anything else. It tells me I spell everything incorrectly like aluminium just because I put all the letters

  • Creating new application problem

    I try to create a new application to switch streams. I call it "studia". I place the server-side code in a file named main.asc and create new folder "studia" in the rootinstall/applications folder. I copy main.asc file to this folder and start Adobe

  • Flash Player 11.7.700.169 and 11.7.700.178 Not loading External Audio

    We have a website that uses Action Script 2 (AS2). We load .mp3 files from our server to our flash program on our website. Sounds built into the flash library load fine, but .mp3's loaded from our server do not. The audio loads a few seconds of the f

  • My iPads subtitle/captions are all uppercase, not letting me change it. Help!

    I use captions and subtitles in everything that I watch. I have two iPads however this iPad is currently giving me this issue. The problem is is that the caption/subtitles are all uppercase. I tried to go under settings to fix this however it doesn't

  • Archive Purchase Order in SRM 5.0@ extended classic senario

    Dear SRM Guru, I use SRM 5.0 in extended classic senario, how can i archive purchase order with limit order using standard SAP? Thanks. Regards, Kim