Invoice simulation issue

Dear Gurus,
PO has has raised for 4 items each with Qty 500
item1 500 qty   value 4990 Eur
item2 500 qty    value 4990 Eur
item3 500 qty    value 460 Eur
item4 500 qty     value 460 Eur
GR happened for
item1 491 qty   value 4900.18 Eur
item2 500 qty    value 4990 Eur
item3 500 qty    value 460 Eur
item4 500 qty     value 460 Eur
at the same time i mean same material document
now when i am doing IR
its showing 4 items
item1 491 qty   value 4900.18 Eur
item2 500 qty    value 4990 Eur
item3 500 qty    value 460 Eur
item4 500 qty     value 460 Eur
but when i am simulating its showing 1st item , and showing debit of 5910 which is a total of Item2,3,4
its not showing vendor G/L account number its showing only GR/IR clearing G/L account number.
than i did i have selected only item 2,3 and 4 and simulated its showing vendor G/L number and GR/IR clearing account also.
Please help how can i Proceed to slove this issue
Regards
venu

No kishore, i am posting correctly,
selecting 4 item while doing IR and similating ,if i select 4 items its not showling the items2,3,4 at the same time vendor G/L account also not reflecting.if i select items 2,3,4 its coming Properly.
Please advice me
Regards
venu

Similar Messages

PO default invoice matching issue

Hi All,
I'm facing a PO default invoice matching issue. As we know, we can use the PO default invoice type to copy the invoice detail information from PO e.g. PO distribution. The following is the problem details:
Oracle Application Version: 11.5.10.2
1. PO distribution (PO Charge Account) 01-110-1570-0000-000
2. Receiving Option (Expense AP Accrual Account) 01-000-2225-0000-000
3. Item destination type is Expense.
When I create the PO default invoice, give the po number and click the match button, Match to Purchase Order form comes out. And then I give the Qty invoiced and click the match button. Ideally, the invoice distribution account should be same as the PO distribution account e.g 01-110-1570-0000-000. But the invoice distribution account is 01-000-2225-0000-000. Could you please explain my doubt on this?
Thanks & Best Regards,
Jerome
Edited by: Jerome.Yin on Aug 21, 2009 8:25 PM
Duplicate Thread, Please look into the another one. Sorry for inconvenience

Hi All,
I'm facing a PO default invoice matching issue. As we know, we can use the PO default invoice type to copy the invoice detail information from PO e.g. PO distribution. The following is the problem details:
Oracle Application Version: 11.5.10.2
1. PO distribution (PO Charge Account) 01-110-1570-0000-000
2. Purchasing Option (Expense AP Accrual Account) 01-000-2225-0000-000
3. Item destination type is Expense.
When I create the PO default invoice, give the po number and click the match button, Match to Purchase Order form comes out. And then I give the Qty invoiced and click the match button. Ideally, the invoice distribution account should be same as the PO distribution account e.g 01-110-1570-0000-000. But the invoice distribution account is 01-000-2225-0000-000. Could you please explain my doubt on this?hi
this is a general rules. invoice distribution shows the Debit entries. and AP Expense Accrual A/C is debited in Invoice while it is credit in Receiving.
Thanks
Lisan

Invoice related Issue

Dear Gurus,
If the invoice is not going to generate the accounting document, system should not allow the user to save the invoice.
Every month we are facing the problem of invoices not posted to accounting because of variuos reasons like account det not done, pricing error, standard cost not released, posting period is not open etc...
So we want to put a control on this, if for any reason the invoice is not generating the accounting doc. then system should not allow the user to save the invoice. Then we can resolve the issue there and then itself.
Thanks & Regards,
Sreehari.

To resolve the error, you can analyze account determination in the billing document. Process:
Goto T.Code: VF02 & Enter Invoice number
Next (On the top most strip) goto Environment
Next (Select Environment) go to Account determination
Next (In Account Determination) select Revenue Account Determination (first option)
This will list all the condition types in the Billing document & analyze each condition & check for which G/L accounts is not determined.
Possible SD errors:
1. VKOA not maintained for required combination
Solution: Maintain the combination in VKOA.
2. Account Assignment of Customer / material not maintained in Customer / Material Master (If maintained in combination in VKOA).
Solution:
Option 1 (Standard solution):
step 1: Cancel Billing Document --> Reverse PGI --> cancel Delivery --> Cancel Sales Order
step 2: Maintain Customer master / Material Master correctly.
step 3: Recreate sales Order --> Delivery --> PGI --> Invoicing.
Option 2:
Force the Account Assignment Group of Customer / Material through Debug in change mode of Billing document, which will release Billing Document to Accounting.
3. Account Key not maintained in Pricing Procedure:
Impact: This may create accounting document, but if condition type, which are to be posted to account, but do not have account key maintained in pricing procedure, it will not be post the relevant condition type to G/L account.
From FI Side, you require to check that all the G/L account has been maintained through T.Code: FS00. G/L account being Master data has to be created in each client ot uploaded through LSMW / SCATT / BDC.
In Billing Document in change mode (in the first screen where we enter Billing Document number), on the top most left hand corner, take a dropdown on Billing Document & select Release to accounting. Here you can get the under mentioned possible message:
1. G/L account not found
2. Cost Element not maintained for G/L account.
In both the above cases, FI consultant requires to take corrective action.
Regards,
Rajesh Banka
Reward points if helpful.

RG1 Simulation issue

Dear All,
While updating RG1 register, I selected the line items to update and click on "Simulate" button, traffice light turned to "Red".
Actually, mine is a Stock Transport Order. I have created a delivery based on a P.O and a Proforma invoice based on the delivery.
After that, I am receiving the material in the receiving plant based on "Outgoing delivery".
I checked everything, everything is fine. What may be the issue here.
Regards,
Mullairaja

hi
The process
Receiving plant raises the PO ME21N
Supplying plant creates the delivery in VL10B
VL02n do the PGI asn save the delivery.
With reference to delivery create the proforma invoice JEX in VF01.
sUPPLYING PLANT CREATES THE EXCISE INVOICE WITH REFERENCE TO PROFORMA INVOICE IN j1IIN.
In supplying plant we have to update the rg1 register
Receivng plant captures the goods receipt in MIGO and also excise invoice
regards
SAP SD
Edited by: sapkpit_sd on Jul 20, 2010 9:25 AM

AP - Invoice Discounting Issue

Hi,
I'm troubleshooting an issue where invoices that are not meant to have discounts, are having a First Discount amount applied. This discounted amount is then paid in a payment run, when the full amount should be paid.
The invoice terms are 2% 3 Days 1% 5 Days Net 15, with an invoice date/payment rate date/terms date in September; the due date and payment date are in November, so discounting should not have been applied. In fact, the invoice payment schedule shows the correct full amount, but the Payment, which occurred months after, uses the 2% discounted amount.
I double checked the terms configuration, and ensured the "Always Take Discount" set up option isn't enabled.
Does anyone have a clue as to why 1) the discount is being applied, and 2) why the invoice scheduled payment amount is correct, but then the amount paid is discounted (incorrect).
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks and regards,
Chris

Hi Chris,
the only logical explanation would be due to "Always Take Discount" configuration, which you have already checked ...However just to go over the basics again, have you checked the below places:
1) At supplier Header Level,
Switch Responsibility to Payables
Navigate to Suppliers > Entry
Query for the Supplier
Click Invoice Management link from left pane..
In the Invoice Payment Terms region, see the option "Always Take Discount" is checked or not ...2) At Supplier Site Level,
Switch Responsibility to Payables
Navigate to Suppliers > Entry
Query for the Supplier
Click Invoice Management link from left pane..
Click the TERMS Tab in the Supplier sites region
See the option "Always Take Discount" is checked or not ...3) At Payables System Setup,
Switch Responsibility to Payables
Navigate to Setup > Options > Payables System Setup
See the option "Always Take Discount" is checked or not ...System would first check for this option at Supplier Site level, if no value found it will check at supplier header level, if again no value found it will check at the Payables System Setup level ....
Check and confirm if the above is verified ... then we could think on different lines ...
References:
Discount incorrectly always taken [ID 1111628.1]
Regards,
Ivruksha

Invoice printing issue

HI ...
I have an issue in printing invoice.....
invoice contains 7line items per page....
Against that particular invoice original copy which was taken print out , tha last item line is completely missing and that too
suppose ...last item 070   cs   12345     lemon tea description   4343.00       1234.00
                                                               *non-taxable*
                                                               *support*       ....
In the above displayed last line item 070 line is completely missing ,but the 2nd and 3rd line of the description in next lines are being displayed.....
and this problems occurs only in the first print in ,when it is printed on a plain paper it is perfectly fine and displays the first line as well...
i want to know how to debug and find the solution in th driver porgram as i think the problem is inthe logic of driver program.
output type is rd00..and it is only single output type....
please help me solve this ticket as its on high priority.....sos
thanks in advance
Santosh

Hi Expert
seenario 1:
Unit price is not printed in Invoice, in case the item condition type is ZN00. Customer is demanding that every item does appear on the invoice with an unit price
Scenaro 2 :
Customer requires item details of the individual invoices on the invoice list; they want to see the lines for full service and rental separately. Currently smartform ZSDINVOICE_LIST_SF_PORT does not support this
Please help me on this issues

Invoice updating issue - development case

Hi All,
We are into extended classic scenario and we create invoices from SRM side.
At the header level of the line item we will be able to see a field FI posting date.
Requirement is once the invoice is approved we need to
change the FI posting date to current date.
This needs to be done to prevent invoice from erroring out due to being posted in closed period.
Can this be achieved from BAdi : BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI or bbp_determine_driver?(as per note 1020736)
I face the following issue in debugging mode when using docchange badi method BBP_IV_CHANGE
observed here that in IS_header:field itm_type is not getting updated and
also the approval_ind once the invoice is approved
Please help!!Kindly provide suggestions to achieve this change.
Regards,
Supriya

Hi Vikas,
We went ahead with the badi implementation.We were able to change the posting date to current date.
But we follow one step approval workflow for invoices.So the workflow considers - change in a field as change in document and triggers the workflow again.
we are working on supressing this extraneous workflow.
Let me know if you need further details. Do you have any suggestions?
Thanks
Supriya

Parked Invoices - Workflow Issue

Hi All,
We have an issue with posting of parked invoices. A particular invoice has been released from workflow. Even in the workflow control of parked inovices, all the 3 check boxes are marked. However, the invoice still appears as a Parked invoice in the Vendor account.
Is there any way to release this in the system? Or to reverse the invoice from the system?
Thanks
Bijal
Updated
Edited by: BIjal Gala on Mar 2, 2010 3:32 PM

Yeah you are looking at the right sql. First value is item type and second is item ke.
For e.g. for a PO if you have to debug the issue you can get these values from PO_HEADERS_ALL table. There are two columns wf_item_type and wf_item_key in PO_HEADERS_ALL.
Or you can look at the Workflow Administrator Responsibility also. There you can search the instance of your workflow and see what path the Work flow took and where it got stuck.
Thanks
Arun

Well Documented Live View Exposure Simulation Issue

I'm including a number of links which document this issue across multiple canon cameras. After doing a search on the canon forum, I can't find this particular issue, so I thought I'd post and see if we can get an official solution. (New to the Canon forums, so if I'm not looking in the right place, please let me know.)
In my opinion, the vimeo link illustrates this best. (and while the 2nd link says "solved" ... perhaps the solution could be described as "janky" at best.)
Basically, from what I can gather: The Live View (*in photo mode) uses the lens's aperture data to update the exposure simulation parameters. This effects the way the LCD and the Histogram interpret exposure settings. If you are using a lens without these digital chips, the Exp. Sim. parameters don't get updated and the liveview/histogram will sometimes appear under exposed when compared to the actual photograph (anywhere from -1 to -4 stops from what I've seen).
What's strange is that this problem disapears in video mode. Perhaps I don't understand the real issue, but it sounds like a firmware update is needed. Is there an update available(or will there be) that fixes this problem?
https://vimeo.com/43633270
http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/showthread.php?246032-dark-live-view-on-T2i-550D-when-using-vintage-manual...
http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/archive/index.php/t-247001.html

If I understand you correctly... you're referring to a 3rd party lens designed to fit on a Canon EOS body as an "EF" lens -- not actually suggesting that Canon themselves make a lens that has the problem.
Niether Canon nor Nikon (nor anybody else that I am aware of) release the specs to 3rd party lens makers. Those 3rd parties reverse-engineer the cameras in an attempt to build compatible lenses. Again, I'd stress that to my knowledge, ALL camera makers are the same in this respect. It is not a differentiator.
Rokinon (and the same lenses are sold under a variety of names) is known for their very cheap lenses. It's a bit of a case of "you get what you paid for."
I don't work for Canon so I'm not trying to argue that you should only consider Canon products. (I do like their products and am happy with all of my Canon gear.) But I would probably not reduce my camera buying decisions be decided by just this one feature alone. There are are so many aspects to consider when buying a camera. Is this really that important to you?
The guy in this video is using a Canon 5D III. That's a $3500 camera body. Realistically, no photographer who can afford a $3500 camera body is going to shoot with a Rokinon 14mm lens -- and then have the audacity to expect that it's Canon's fault when the cheap lens isn't fully compatible with the high end $3500 body. :-/
There are a number of 3rd party lens makers... Sigma, Tokina, Tamron... and then there are some very high end lens makers... Schneider, Ziess, etc. But when these lens makers build lenses for the cameras, they actually do tend to work correctly (not always... and sometimes a lens that worked with one body might not continue to work years later when Canon comes out with newer bodies... but Canon's own lenses DO work EVEN when you upgrade camera bodies. Canon makes certain of that.)
Rokinon, however (and the same lenses are sold under multiple names... Samyang, Bower, Pro-Optic, etc.) are known for their especially cheap, basic, low-end lenses. If you are going to buy an exceptionally cheap, basic, low-end lens... you should probably not be at all surprised to learn that there are limitations. Notice, for example, that the lens has an aperture ring on the lens... modern lenses don't do that anymore.
Tim Campbell
5D II, 5D III, 60Da

Guided Software Simulation issue - Captivate 7

Hi all,
I'm new to Captivate 7 but am an experienced Lectora user. I purchased Captivate mainly to make use of the Software Simulation functions.
It's proving very difficult to find any tutorials or resouces online to help solve this particular problem:
1) I want to create a Software Simulation demo of a program being used (I have done this step no problem).
2) I want the user to then do the same steps for themselves - I have also achieved this in 'Training mode' with correct & incorrect captions
3) On failure of 3 or 4 attempts of clicking an incorrect function, I want the user to be sent to the demo again, then back to try it for themselves until it's correct.
The question is; How do I achieve step 3?
If anyone can provide a step-by-step answer that would be great.
Many thanks.

The solution to your issue requires use of Variables and Advanced Actions. These are very powerful features in Adobe Captivate, but they take some time to learn, and there are an almost unlimited number of ways to use them.
You don't clarify in your description whether or not the user fails three or four individual clicks on objects, or whether they fail the entire training simulation three or four times. Which is it?
I would recommend you start studying up on this aspect of Captivate. There are quite a few websites you can find by Googling for info about Adobe Captivate Advanced Actions.
This e-book gives you a complete introduction to the subject, starting simple and moving to progressively more advanced techniques:
http://www.infosemantics.com.au/adobe-captivate-advanced-actions
(It also comes with practice project files for Cp5, 6, and 7.)

Software simulation issue - help!

When extending the screen of my laptop by using an additional monitor and using the software simulation tool on Captivate 7, I have re-sized and aligned the red record border to the correct size (1280 x 720) and recorded the action. When the slides appear in Captivate, the red border can be seen, the recorded area has moved and the mouse position is now wrong.
I need the extended monitor because the laptop has the wrong resolution for what I am recording. Is there a way to resolve this?

Hi @Onanisland
Welcome to the HP Forums!
It is a great place to find answers and tips!
For you to have the best experience in the HP forum I would like to direct your attention to the HP Forums Guide Learn How to Post and More
I understand that after doing some updates your Instant Text is no longer functioning fully.
If you click on the shield or logo or perhaps right click do you get any additional details?
Have you tried using MS Fix It to try and overcome this difficulty?
Have you tried contacting the manufacturer of the software for possible solutions ? Textware Solutions Forums
There are also contact links on the bottom of the Textware solution forums.
You could also do a restore back to before the updates were installed. HP Notebook PCs - Using Microsoft System Restore
You could also try uninstalling the software and reinstalling.
Best of Luck!
Sparkles1
I work on behalf of HP
Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
Click the “Kudos, Thumbs Up" on the bottom right to say “Thanks” for helping!

KKA2 Simulation Issue...

Hi,
I am executing KKA2 for simulating the WBS postings. I have different exchange rates for 2 periods. 1st period 0.64599 & 2nd period 0.59630. When i execute the RA for 1st period the posting happens to respective accounts properly. When i execute the 2nd period, the difference of 1st period & 2nd period exchange rate is calculated for USD & posted to unbilled account.The same USD amount of unbilled is reversed int the 3rd period. This is a standard behavior. Is there a way to avoid posting to unbilled account?
Kind Regards,
Kalyan

Hello Gokulkrishnan Pillai,
Thank you for the guidance. The issue was passing the USD values to export_basis table in one of the user exists. This is now calculated & passed with right value. It has been resolved & we dont get unbilled anymore.
Kind Regards,
Kalyan

Assessment Simulation Issue

I created an assessment simulation. In my project preview, if I can click the forward button it will allow me to advance to the next slide without performing the necessary actions. How can I stop this?
Note: My failure captions display and the slide won't auto advance. Only issue is clicking the forward button.

Hello and welcome,
Totally agree with Sreekanth, I will never show the playbar when it is an assessment simulation.
But he forgot your second question: 'slide will not auto advance'. Are you talking about an inserted click box, that has to be clicked? Or is it a Text Entry Box in which the user has to type something? For both examples, check the settings in the Properties panel: how many attempts are provided, what are the Actions On Success, and After Last Attempt? Those actions will be executed when the trainee has clicked on the click box or has entered the required text.
Lilybiri

Invoicing Date Issue

Hi All,
Good Day,
Please enclosed my Client Requirment of Invoicing Date.
Requirment : The Client is doing Sales and Deliveries of Cement from Saturday till Friday. He will Generate the Invoice Every Saturday Morning. He wants Single Invoice (i.e Billing Date should be Saturday only) to be generated for all the Deliveries which has been created from Saturday till Friday (7 Days Sales)
I created one Shipping Calendar with every *Saturday* as Billing Date in the Special Rule and I have uncheck all the Options and I have maintained it in Customer Master.
The Issue I am facing here, The Deliveires which are getting generated on Sunday till Friday is taking Billing Date as Saturday as per the Calendar settings maintained in Master Date. The Deliveries getting generated on Saturday (_08012011_) is taking 08012011 as the Biling Date. Due to which I am not able to combined the Deliveries of Saturday into Single Invoice of other days. I want the Deliveries getting generated on Saturday should take Next Saturday as the Billing Date so as to created single Collective Invoice for Deliveries getting created from Saturday till Friday.
Do I need to make settings in Shipping Calendar which I have already created or I need to go with any User Exit or ABAP Development so that Deliveries Created on Saturday will capture next Saturday as Billing Date.
Please suggest the suitable solution.
Thanks & Regards,
Parag Sanganee.

Hi Srinath,
I have tried your solution but it is not working out.
Is there any User Exit in Delivery where I can put a Validation in MV45AFZZ i.e if the Delivery is getting created on Saturday for a specific customer the Billing Date should be chnaged to next Saturday.
I have checked in Deliveries We cannot amend the Billing Date. Any my Customer wants all Deliveries to be billed in Single Invoice which are getting generated from Saturday till Friday evening to be Invoiced Saturday morning.
Please let me know the solution.
Thanks,
Parag.

R12 AP Invoice Validation Issues

Has anyone gone live on R12.0.0 and not had issues with invoice validation?

Carl,
Run the Gather Schema Statistics program for Payables and Payments applications with degree 20. As soon as this GSS completes, submit the validation and Accounting again. This is will definitely resolve your problem.
- Kiran

Invoice simulation issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for