Issue in result analysis enhancement

hello all
I had done the enancemnt in the working of RA key.
We had changed the calcualtion of cost of sales and planned profit
but even after doing all the coding in hte enhancement i am not able to trigger while calcualting the RA run.
KIndly help
thanks
anil

Hello
The same situation i had face.
what the basic problem is in the calcualtion of RA key in OKG3 expert view there is a check box whether
this ra key should have to use the enhancement or not.
If you had ticked then only it will go to that enhancment otherwise not.
try this hopefully you get the solution.
Award the points if answered.
alok

Similar Messages

Project Results Analysis KKA2 Enhancement

In SPRO - Project System - Revenue & Earnings- Automatic & Periodic
Allocation - Result Analysis - Edit result analysis key & version -
Maintain Result analysis version,
If, CO Area 1000 & RA Version 0 selected, system is not allowing cross-
company valuation check box activation due to "Transfer to Financial
accounting active" check box is selected.
However if "Transfer to Financial accounting active" check box is un-
selected, system is allowing to save with option "cross-company
valuation" check box. But during KKA2, system is showing error due
to "version relevant to settlement" is selected.
Now the problem is that, if "cross-company valuation check box" is not
selected the system is not skiping steps as mentioned in screen.
Hence, enhancement KKAG0001 cannot be activated.
Kindly provide the solution.

Do you have an OSS ID? There is a document to describe the setting of RA for IAS in service.sap.com/erp, access the sub-node of management accounting -> product cost accounting -> media library.
Or access the URL
[https://websmp206.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700006305122006E.PDF]
If you don not have any OSS ID, please reply my message.
Flex Yang

Results Analysis Sales Order Issue

Hi Fellows,
When i am running the results analysis for Sales orders using KKAK transaction , I do not wish to see the WIP items with 0 Values.So i selected the option " Hide Orders with 0 values in Results List ".
However I am still getting the WIP items with 0 Value.
I saw the help for this and it says
" Note: In some cases individual objects may still appear in the list when both the column "Reserves for unrealized costs" (reserve for unrealized costs + reserve for complaints/commissions) and the column "Reserves for imminent loss" are a sum of multiple value fields and these value fields are checked individually for zero value ".
From the above, I came to the conclusion that the 0 value items may still come even if we check the box.
However from the above note, can anyone tell me where i can check the " Reserves for Unrealized Costs " and " Reserves for Imminent Loss " and also how can i know what are the value fields which are adding up to these columns.
Also it says the Value fields are individually checked for zero value.
Where can i see the Value fields associated with this Results Analysis and where can i see if the Value fields are assigned a value of zero.
Please let me know if you have any thoughts on this..
Thanks in advance..
Srik

Thx but We are not 11i but 11.0.3 -- older release....I am familiar with the API's and the 'Interface Trip Stop' concept in 11i...

Results Analysis Categories

I am trying to understand how Results Analysis works on WBS. Is there any information on this. Some issues we have is
1.CLRV is not equal to VLRV for standard SAP. In our scenario we want to maintain constant margin by accruing cost as a planned percentage of actual revenue. Today CLRV is incorrect but VLRV is correct. Do I need to make both equal? If so how?
Or, can I gnore CLRV since COPA is getting the VLRV values.
2. COSR settlement of accrual/ deferral on another scenario using custom enhancement 1 is equal to total revenue and not accrued amount. Wouldnt this double FI postings? How do I avoid?
3. Is there good documentation on Result Analysis? If so where?
Message was edited by:
Ning Jiang
Message was edited by:
Ning Jiang

Hi,
If u are using same COA for both the company codes, why to use secound Controlling area.
Secondly why to Create, config and upload all the master datas,
U can reset the Comp code so the Master data will be deactivated
and u can post it.
Regards,
Padma

Results Analysis Settle Internal Order (from CRM) - No cost element allowed

In SPRO results analysis configuration to "Define Posting Rules for Settlement to Financial Accounting" I am not allowed to use an account with a cost element. (Error: I get error KQ 119 G/L account ### cannot be created as a cost element.)
I configure a G/L account with no cost element. KO88 Settlement posts to G/L account fine; however, does not post to the internal order because the config mentioned on first line does not allow me to use an account with a cost element.
Problem: I am unable to see settlement in KOB1 report because settlement goes to GL Account, but does not post to the internal order.
Failed solution: I tried to use OKC9 substitution at KO88 to substitute the internal order number. The problem is that table AUFKV is empty when the substitution runs at KO88 settlement. I am not able to substitute the order number because the order number isn't even available in the substitution at internal order settlement.
I put a break manual break point in program GBTACCOB at the call to the substitution rule I defined. The breakpoint stops at the substitution when I run KO88 settlement; however, fields are blank. I am unable to do substitution. I know this works because I have a similar substitution on the same internal order for accounting indicator when doing an MB1A goods issue to an internal order. The break point stops there and the AUFKV data is available for substitution rule.
Question:
Any suggested solutions to to have internal order update into KO88 settlement after KKA1 results analysis would be helpfull.

It is more of a reporting issue really.
The problem is that internal order settlement with settlement profile instead of results analysis does post the settlement to the internal order and does use a cost element. This is the business process the users currently have. Our users have a requirement to settle the orders weekly. This helps them find issues earlier and speeds up the month end close.
In the past we could use KOB1 and see the current balance of an internal order and see the settlement. Now that report no longer shows the settlement. How can I see what has been settled on an order and what hasn't now?

Quantity base POC method of result analysis

hello all,
We are trying to create the result analysis key with quantity based POC method for Projects. we are choosing the Profit basis as E,K,M but we are getting the error ' Profit basis is only used for sales order.
Can anybody help resolving the issue?
Regards,
sudhir

RamSiva,
I see that you've got the calculated COGS equal to the actual cost. I would have thought that for quantity based POC the calculated cost should be equal to POC x C(p). So if that's the case, I think the postings should be as follows:
Debit Revenue for 36,000
Credit Reserve for Revenue surplus for 36,000
Since I don't know what the planned cost were I don't know what the correct signs are for COGS adjustment;
Debit / Credit (Expense)
Debit / Credit (Capitalized cost or reserve for unrealized cost, depending on the sign)
If R(a) less than R(c) then:
Credit Revenue
Debit Revenue in excessive of billings
thanks,

WIP according local GAAP vs IFRS - only one result analysis key

Dear experts,
I am faced with the following issue. We use WBS-elements for long running activities. We set result analysis key on WBS-element for periodic WIP calculation. The actual result analysis key is set up according local GAAP.
Now we want to implement parallel accounting according IFRS. Here we can use percentage of completion for valuation of our project(s).
How can we handle two methods of WIP calculation? We can only set one resulat analysis key on WBS element?
How do you handle this issue.
Thanks for your reply in advance
Regards,
Butch

Thanks for the quick feedback.
Maybe some additional information:
01 - IFRS (real time link with FI)
02 parallell currency deprec area
20 - LOCAL GAAP
50 - Grants IFRS value (investment measure support area) linked realtime to FI
51 parallel currency deprec area of 50
60 - Grants Local GAAP
I already checked the SAP library and the SDN forum, but could not find anywhere how to set up the depreciation area(Grants LOCAL GAAP) to which the investment measure is not directly linked to (not the support area (50) in Tr ANVEST).
Is it possible with only one investement key to fill the IFRS (50) & Local GAAP (60) value investment depreciation area and still depreciate them in different ways?
Thanks again!
Kr,
Roeland

No entered status set. No results analysis will be performed

Hi Guys,
I keep on getting this error message beloe and the valuation is on RELEASE status
No entered status set. No results analysis will be performed
Message no. KJ210
Diagnosis
The valuation of the order or project in results analysis depends on the status of the object.
In this case, the object does not have an active status entered in the valuation methods in Customizing for WIP calculation and results analysis. Consequently, WIP calculation and results analysis cannot find a method with which the object can be processed.
Procedure
Decide whether the object should be processed in its current state (indicated by its active status in status management) by WIP calculation and results analysis.
If you want to process the object:
In Customizing for results analysis, choose Period-End Closing -> Results Analysis -> Define Valuation Methods for Results Analysis, add an entry for this status, and specify how objects with this status should be processed.
If you do not want to process the object:
This message is inconsequential for you. No follow-up actions are necessary.
In Customizing for results analysis, choose Period-End Closing -> Results Analysis -> Define Valuation Methods for Results Analysis and select the No valuation indicator. This message is then no longer issued by the system.
Example:
In the standard system, there is normally no entry in the valuation method for the status CRTD (Created). You will therefore receive this message for objects that only have the status CRTD.

Hi Guys,
I manage to run the RA. The problem why I could'nt get it right was because I did not run transaction MMPV to close period for material master
Thanks for your help.

Results analysis data is calculated through sales order

Hi All,
I m trying to calculate WIP of one process Order through KKAX. But I am getting the below error
Results analysis data is calculated through sales order 300002423 001000
Message no. KJ112
Diagnosis
The order you selected for WIP calculation or results analysis is assigned to a sales order. A results analysis key was entered for this sales order.
System Response
The system determines results analysis data for orders assigned to sales order items through the results analysis for the sales order.
Procedure
Carry out results analyis on sales order 300002423 001000.
This process Order is related to Sales Order and I have checked the Result Analysis key is attached to Sales Order.
Please help me out in this issue.
Thanks!
Regards,
Vivek

Hi,
I was getting the above error because a RA key was selected ar Sales Order, Now what I have done is I have removed the RA Key from Sales Order, there is already a RA key attached to Process Order. Now When i am calculating KKAX (WIP) I am getting below message
The order is not a WIP element
Message no. KJ148
I have done this because my client is not using KKA3(RA fro Sales Order)
Please help!!!!!!!!!
Thanks!
Regards,
Vivek Srivastava

Doubt in Result Analysis

Hi Experts,
Result

Hi,
Result Analysis:
Overview:
The objective for calculating Work in Process (WIP) is to determine the value of manufacturing activity in process at the end of a fiscal period, during a fiscal period and to properly reflect this value on the financial statements. WIP calculation is a facet of Results Analysis (RA). RA is a specialized tool within the controlling module that computes and analyzes the value of WIP. The terms WIP calculation and RA are generally interchangeable.
Results analysis is used to:
a. Calculate the inventory value of finished and unfinished products in a non-valuated project stock or non-valuated sales stock environment or
b. You are using a valuated sales order stock or valuated project stock and want to capitalize goods that have been delivered but not yet invoiced.
The difference between SAP and other systems is in the treatment of material consumption for manufacturing. Component issues to production orders, run schedules, WBSs, etc is immediately treated as an expense to the P&L statement. The issue is not treated as a reclassification from raw or semi-finished inventory to WIP inventory. SAP considers WIP to be a snapshot of values that can be computed on demand and passed to the general ledger as required to re-class the values to the balance sheet. This process demands a specific, methodical approach to be used for period-end and mid-period processing. Rules used to calculate the value of WIP and settle WIP to the G/L are defined in multiple RA tables depending upon the requirements of the company. RA is designed to support a variety of calculation techniques and there may and are alternate settings depending on the demands of the company. To support the configuration, scenarios and unit testing need to be thorough. RA needs to be configured towards the middle of the of the implementation with subsequent testing. This will allow for configuration of the data needed to support WIP and RA (chart of accounts, production orders, projects, cost centers, cost elements, etc.)
Configuration Transactions:
OKG1 u2014 Create Results Analysis Key
OKG2 u2014 Results Analysis Version
OKG9 u2014 Results Analysis Version
OKGC u2013 OKGD u2014 Valuation Methods
IMG SPRO u2014 Define Line IDs
OKGB u2014 Define Assignment Mapping by incoming charges by cost element to line IDs
OKG5 u2014 Define Assignment Mapping by incoming charges by cost element to line IDs
OKG4 u2014 Define Update
OKG6 u2014 Define Number Ranges
Thanks,
Rau

Stastical Costs on WBS in result analysis

Dear Gurus,
At my client scenario, I am using valuated project stock. Normally in case of valuated project stock, actual cost does not get updated on WBS element at the time of good receipt from PO account assigned to WBS Element.
But I referred SAP note 533207 to achieve actual cost on WBS Element.
As per note, I have created cost element with category 90 for Balance sheet GL account (called at the time of good receipt).
Due to this, at the time of goods receipt, statistical cost gets posted on WBS Element and seen as actual cost on WBS Element reports (This is solving our reporting requirement).
But when I run result analysis (KKA2) on partiular WBS Element, system does not consider this actual cost (stastical cost posted on WBS Element).
It seems system is not considering statistical costs on WBS Element in result analysis (KKA2).
Is there any way to achieve this (consideration of stastical costs on WBS Element in result analysis)
Thanks and Regards,
Parimal

Hi All,
Thanks for your replies....I also appreciate that stastical cost can not be considered as actual cost in result analysis.
But in case of valuated project stock, if stock is available for WBS Element and not issued to production order or any other receiver, under which category the value of WBS stock is to be shown in result analysis.
Is there any other period end function to be carry out specifically for stock valuation or
how to represent it in results of project period end procedures

Results analysis Key determination in sales order

Hi all,
Im having a bit of an issue with our results analysis settlement and was wondering if you could help.
How is the results analysis key determined in a sales order line item?
Many thanks
phil.

Result analysis key is created by CO Consultant, and that result anlysis key will be assign in requirement classes.
suppose created result anlysis key is 000004, this key will be assign in requirement class ( is make to order 040) Configuration.
so there from key will be populated in sales order item. under the assignments teb page.
i think this will be clarify u.
Thanks
Karne Nagaraju

Results analysis for POC method with statistical cost element

Hi,
We are testing ETO (engineering-to-order) scenario With valuated
project stock and cost based POC RA method.
Inventory is updated during external procurement and we have used
statistical cost elements (Cost element category - 90) for inventory G/L.We want to use a
Result analysis method which considers this statistical cost elements
for calculating POC.For this purpose we have implemented SAP Notes
616960, 616869 and 78420.
In short, as per SAP note 616869, we created a customer enhancement
project for customer enhancement 5 of the results analysis (see Note
H78420). We copied the source code for customer enhancement 5 of the
correction instructions of note 616869 and then implemented SAP note
616960 to read the statistical actual costs.
Then we included the statistical cost as actual costs - Category K in
OKG4.
The system is doing POC and revenue in excess of billing calculation
correctly after taking into consideration the posted statistical cost.
During settlement of RA (CJ88), system is not giving effect to
inventory value. On settlement of RA, revenue should be recognized but
at the sametime the inventory represented by statistical posting should
be consumed(COS). The system should post a P&L posting which reduces
the inventory (representing statistical cost) and updates the actual
costs on settlement.
In our example, Statistical actual
posting is of USD 57150, planned revenue USD 100000 and POC is 70.27%.
Revenue in excess of billing comes to USD 70265.60. Recognisation of
revenue of USD 70265.60 is not correct as actual consumption is yet to
happen. The correct posting in FI should be revenue of USD 70265.60
along with COS of USD 57150.
Please suggest why on settlement the system is not posting the COS
along with revenue recognised?
Thanks,
BK

Hi Bijay,
We are in a similar situation in one project. Did you get any solution to the problem you posted here? If you can share it, please.
Regards,
Gireesh

Results Analysis for Sales Orders

Hi
When i am calculting Results Analysis for Sales Orders as a part of Month End Closing Activities there are some errors for few orders...
Msg Type: E
AppAr: KJ
MsgNo: 216
Message Text: Planned Cost for Valuation are 0. Please Check the Object.
Can any one tell me what might be the error..
Thanks in Advance..
Sivaram

Hi,
The error is offen caused by one or possible more than one of following statements:
- the delivery block of the order is set
- the billing block is set
- the schedule line ( confirmed quantity ) is missing
- the position has been cancelled
- price condition is missing
In case no one of the mentioned options wouldn''t help, set the position status to technically completed, if the position is processed as well ( delivery, invoice, etc. ).
We often face this kind of issue
Good luck
Marian

Result analysis for Direct Postings

Hi All,
I have a new requirement for Result Analysis determination at service order level
Requirement is while posting cost to service order we have two costs, one is through Activity (KP26) and another is direct posting using KB11N.
Both have different cost elements
615000 is for activity pricing using KP26 which posted 120 $
195009 is for direct cost posting using KB11n which posted 150$
Now after the actual cost is posted to service order we are doing result Analysis using KKA1, I am getting 120+150 in WIP. But requirement is system should ignore cost of direct postings using KB11N from WIP and it should calculate 120 alone in WIP
I hope there is no settings using DIP profile to control this, i read some help and it says using OKG4 and OKG5 this can be controlling
I tried using OKG4 with Line id and assigning Category as N , but it is not ignoring
Could you please guide on how to ignore direct cost entries being determined to WIP. I have a vague idea on OKG4 and OKG5
thanks for your help
santosh

Hello,
While OKG4 can achieve however please bear in mind that since you are not going to settle this cost anywhere, cost will always seat of Service order. When you try and close service order you will get error that not all cost is settled, this will further impact your month end RA / Settlement job.
I know we can still close service order having cost but that requires setting on Settlement Profile and most of organization have SOX which does not allow them to close Cost object which has balance onto it.
I am side tracking bit but wanted to bring this up as down steam issue.
Thanks
Parth

Issue in result analysis enhancement

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for