K stock first - WM

Hi
Is there any way to pick the K stock first and then the own stock in WM level without using stock determination.
Thx

Hi,
With out Stock determination. the system will consider only as stock. it won't have difference in WM like Consignment / Normal stock.
This difference only in IM.
SAM

Similar Messages

Project material requirements to consider plant stock first

In some ERP systems, we have project specific BOMs and when the requirements are exploded and netted, the system first tries to see if the demand can be met from plant stock. If full or partial demand can be met from the plant stock, the system recommends a stock transfer order from general (plant) inventory to the project.
Any unmet requirement generates a project specific 'mrp-planned' order (purchase or production recommendation). This way, the planners and financial can see what existing plant stock can be used for a project and they can use this info for financial planning. Once the planner determines that the existing plant stock is usable for the project, he/she can confirm and 'execute' the transfer order which prings the plant stock to the project stock. For engineering or technical reasons (single lot date code requirements) the planner can choose not to accept the stock transfer recommendation (either fully or partially) and manually create purchase recommendation to cover the quantity.
I have read some posts here but it is not clear that IN SAP PS if the collective indicator is set (or not set), would one be able to see, either directly or indirectly, what plant stock is recommended to be transferred as project stock?
Can the behavior of described ERP system be modeled?
Thanks, experts.

Hi,
Please also try the following settings in Material Master to consider the item from plant stock ..
View : MRP1
MRP Type : PD
Lot Size : MB
View : MRP 2
Procurement Type : F
View : MRP 3
Strategy Group : 70
Mixed MRP : 3
Availability Check : 01
View : MRP 4
Individual/coll. : 2
Thanks
Abdul

Automatic entry for Common Stock , first consolidation in additional data

Hi,
I need to know why, after uploading the notification data, the system automatically populates an entry on the additional notification data for 'Changes in Investee Equity' at the activity "First consolidation". I must tell that there were no previous entries because this is the first consolidation on ECCS.
But, where is configured which FS Item should the system identify as the one related to the Common Stock? it is detecting the P&L carrying forward FSI instead of the common stock...
Thanks in advance!
Rushid

I finally got the solution by myself. In fact this behaviour is due to the configuration on tx CXJ5 of a combination of a set of FSitems + a set o subitems that are linked to one unique consolidation activity (01-first consolidation,16-horizontal mergers, etc.)
I hope this will help somebody else in a future.

Split valuation with batch management and project stock

Dear Gurus,
I need to combine two following requirements:
1. split valuation with batch management (valuation type = batch number)
2. project stock
These two functionalities work fine separately but not together.
I receipt PO for material with spiit valuation on a batch level into a project stock. Posting is OK and material document (MSEG table) seems to be OK (batch number, valuation type and project stock are in this table). The problem appears when I want to display material in this valuation type (MM03) or batch (MSC3n). They don't exist!!! Short investigation showed that during goods receipt table MBEW (valuated stock) was not updated with this valuation type.
But If PO is receipt into normal stock first and then posted into project stock everything is OK.
Have you had or heart about such issue? I would appreciate any sugestion.
Thsnks in advance.
Marcin Bernat

Hi,
As you already know ,u are using project stock and doing goods receipt against project, stock table QBEW will be updated and not MBEW. MBEW only updates in case of plant stock valuation. If u receive any goods against project stock it does not contribute to plant stock. Irrespective whether your material is managed in split valuation or not, If it is received against project stock it only updates QBEW. There is no need to update MBEW, if u r using split valuation in project. QBEW also have valuation type as another level like MBEW. If u want to see material price for project stock, it can be seen in QBEW -valuation type and not in mm03.
As u r receiving goods against project stock this is d only reason QBEW is updated and not MBEW.
QBEW will store all information like MBEW for batch number, valuation type and project stock assignment.
Hope it answers your question.
Deepak.

Stock value for stock transfer from depot (RG23D) to manufacturing (RG23A)

Dear all,
The forum posts that I found are all relating to the process of how to do stock transfer from depot plant to manufacturing plant.
The question I want to post is relating to the transferred stock value.
When stock first goes into depot plant (RG23D), the excise duties (CVD, Education Cess, Higher Education Cess, Secondary Education Cess) are all inventorized. However, in manufacturing plant (RG23A), they are CENVATABLE and not inventorized.
In the transfer of stock from depot to manufacturing, how can we split out the stock value from depot and take out the excise duties to CENVAT in manufacturing plant?
If using Stock Transfer process (move stock from depot to manufacturing),
1. Create Stock Transfer Order in ME21N using UD order type
      no accounting
2. Create DO in VL10B and goods issue
During goods issue, moving average of stock in depot plant, will increase stock with the same value in manufacturing plant and reduce the stock value in depot plant. How can we reduce the stock value transferred to manufacturing plant by the original excise duties amount, and pass this amount into J1IEX? Is it done in this step or later steps?
   Dr Stock into manufacturing plant [this value by right, should be reduced as it consists of original excise duties in RG23D?]
      Cr Stock from depot plant
3. J1IJ- RG23D selection for excise invoice for delivery at depot
    no accounting
4. VF01 for proforma invoice
   no accounting
5. MIGO into manufacturing plant (capture excise invoice)- part 1 register. the excise duties can be manually keyed in based on the original RG23D entries when stock is first brought into originating depot plant
     no accounting
6. Enter Incoming Excise Invoice by J1IEX
     Dr CENVAT Input AED
     Dr CENVAT Input BED
     Dr RG23A ECess
     Dr RG23A SHECess
           Cr CENVAT clearing
7. Question: Where to Debit CENVAT clearing? In normal domestic purchase process of raw materials into manufacturing plant, Dr CENVAT clearing will be posted during MIRO time.
If this process is not the correct way to do, please advise the standard SAP recommended way to transfer from depot to manufacturing plant.
Thank you in advance.

You have to add the Excise duty condition types as a Delivery cost Pricing condition types in STO Pricing procedure and have used them in STO. In Pricing procedure, there is no concept of Deductible and Non Deductible. So, what ever the Delivery cost condition you add in Pricing procedure, the amount gets loaded on to the Material cost..To avoid this, a negative condition type needs to be inserted in Pricing procedure with a different accrual key.
You have to add One Positive condition and One Negative Condition type for the same. Negative condition type is to reduce the condition value from the Material cost during GI.
Try this scenario in development server and revert back with your observations.

How can I set up MRP to use QI Stock at the Vendor, for Planned Ind Reqmts

Hi experts,
We are running ECC 6.0.
In one of our plants, we have a lot of components that are available as QI stock in Material Provided to Vendor status.
We build SKUs (MRP type M3) at the top level in the BOM, and the SKUs use the above components. We mostly enter demand at the SKU level in the plant (LSF).
We have set up the source list for all the SKUs in this plant with MRP = 1.
When MRP runs for the components (MRP type PD), system is able to first allocate the QI stock to any of the requirements that are driven by the higher level SKUs. Only then, it creates Planned Orders for the components to account for the shortage.
Issue : We now enter forecast (LSF) directly at the Component level (for some Materials). Now, even though we have excess
component stock to handle all the demand (dependant demand driven from the SKUs + LSF at the Component level), system doesn't allocate the excess QI stock to the LSF demand at the component level. It just creates Planned orders.
Strategy Group for both the SKU and Component is 10. We don't have MRP Areas implemented.
I tried setting up the source list at the Component level using the vendor but there is no use.
Does any one have an idea on how this can be addressed?We want to be able to use up the QI stock first before we create Planned orders.
Thanks,
Rao

How can you create QI stock first before your planed order from MRP run? Do you know this is not standard SAP ?

Error while cancelling GR material is at Block stock

Hi,
I have created a GR for material QM view is maintain , after GR material updated from QM it is rejected, then we have transfer it in Blocked stock in QA11 now we want to cancel the GR, but while GR cancel with MBST or MIGO the stock type it is shoing as X i.e quality stock now in quality stock is 0 because material is at blocked stock. so while cancelling it is giving error as Deficit of SL Stck.in qual.insp 5,000 NO : 928 MS10 S101
how to solve this,
regards,
zafar

Hi
you have to move the stock first quality only. once you got the stock in quality you can send the material to vendor with (122) movement type.
For your reference:
1. SAP NOTE 175842 needs to be implemeted first.
2. User Exit QEVA0008 needs to be activated.
3. Then First of all reverse the UD by transaction QA12, by clicking the Customer Function Tab.
4. Now the stock can be reversed for the same Lot by running program RQEVAC50 in SE38.
above procedure you have to do must if amterial belongs to quality.
laxman

Stock Transport Order (STO) for Consignment Stock

Hi Gurus,
I have a business process that need a STO of Consignment Stock material process.
Example:
In Plant B the stocks of material XYZ is 10 Pcs, but separated with two condition 3 PCs of Unrestricted Stock and 7 PCs of Consignment (Vendor) Stock.
Plant A need 5 pcs of material XYZ from Plant B.
The requirement is to allocate 5 qty in delivery as below:
3 PCs picked from Unrestricted Stock (priority to allocate from unrest.stock first)
2 PCs picked from Consignment Stock (second priority)
How can we do STO Plant to Plant for Consignment (from Vendor) Stock material like I mention above ?
Regards,

Hi ...
Sorry .. I have to inform the requirement details ..
The requirement is "without make it as own stock, so the material consignment stock directly transport from Plant A to Plant B using delivery process as STO standard process"
Is there any best practice to do this ?
Regards,

WM Stock Removal

Hi,
I have the following situation (and i'm kinda new to WM), hope someone can assist.
- materials/batches are received from the vendor in container and/or barrels. It is possible that a quanitity of material from one batch is delivered in a few containers and a few barrels. 4 barrels are combined on a pallet.
- we defined two storage types. One for containers and one for pallet storage. The container storage is a hall without any physical racks/bins. It is just one large area. The pallet storage has racks and bins. 1 pallet can occupy a bin.
- At goods receipt the user selects the units in which the paint is delivered (barrel/container), enters the specific quantity per barrel (this can vary), and put away in the correct storage type is carried out. So far so good.
- When a production order (external system) is released for processing, the material must be issued. The warehouse employee selects the correct material and the available batches are sorted on batch production date (oldest batch first).
- We use the storage type indicator in the material master, which causes the system to look at barrels first, then containers. This is however not correct, because the quantity that is requested in the production order must determine the storage type from which the material is issued.
How can i make this work?
For example: a small order for a quantity of 200 may not initially be supplied by a container (unless barrel not available), a large order for a quantity of 10000 may not be initially supplied by a barrel (unless container not available). The storage type indicator tries to use up (current sequence) the barrel storage stock first, then the container stock.
A new production run must always be supplied by a full storage unit first in case the order quantity is equal or more than one full unit, so we tried out partial pallet strategy. This seems to work per storage type.
Thanks in advance....

Thanks,
That removal strategy seems to do it.
I have another question:
We have one WM managed storage location (X) and two storage locations (Y and Z) which are not managed by the warehouse. When we perform a 311 movement from X to Y or Z, it depends on the destination storage location from what storage type in X the material has to come from.
I tried the following:
- I created a special movement indicator to indicate the movement of material from X to Y.
- I interfaced the normal 311 IM movement to WM movement 311 and the 311 with indicator 1 movement to WM movement 911.
- In OMLY, i set up references to movement types for storage type search. 311 has reference 1 and 911 has reference 2.
- These settings can also be seen in the movement type definition for the warehouse.
- I created two storage type indicators. L01 with reference 1 and L04 with reference 2, both with other storage types to withdraw material from.
- There is a storage type indicator present in the material master (L01).
When i post the normal 311 without special movement indicator in IM, the TO is automatically generated.
When i post the 311 with movement indicator 1, the system generates a message that the storage type search for L01 is not defined.
What's going wrong here?
Is there another way of accomplishing the task?
Thanks!

Reverse Stock Items

Dear experts,
Could you please give your advice on the below issue,
We have some items GR into stock ,
I have perfomed bothe GR/IR and the vendor invoices were paid too , Now I relaised these should not be a sockable items , How can these items can be remove /adjust from the Stock accounts
Among these one of the transaction done in 2009
thank you

you can either create a PO directly with account assignment category K, or you just receive to stock and do then a goods issue with MIGO and movement type 201.
In general it is just one transaction more that you have to perform if you receive into stock first.
but especially for stock items it gives more security into the process, especially if you receive stock items and non-stackable items in the same place. When doing the goods receipt it is hard for the user to know whether the receipt goes to stock or hasto be brought to someones office.

Customer stock reset -- sales order deleted.

Hi Gurus,
customer stock tied to the sales order is updated. But now the sales order is deleted. Now, How to remove the material form customer stock.
Thanks in advance
ram

I think you need to have a sales order, remove the stock first then delete the sales order. Try creating a sales order with the same customer first, then remove stock (same way as you brought in or adjust out) then delete sales order.

Stock updation in In process inspection

Hello everyone,
I had a question regarding In process inspection
My client requires that upon performing in process inspection ( currently inspection type:03) he should be able to automatically post the same to Blocked or unrestricted use stock as recorded
This I know is possible if I post stock first using GR (inspection type:04) As a result stock goes automatically to QC stock. But this would not serve the purpose since he again has to do quality UD again.
So is there any way I can do this?
Any help is higly appreciable.
Sincerely,
Aji

In QM view for 04 inspection type -->
An inspection type assigned to inspection lot origin 04 is active
The Control of inspection lot creation indicator for the inspection type is set so that the system will create an inspection lot for early inspection for goods receipt
This will create then inspection lot of 04 when you release the production/process order.This lot is created along with 03 inspection type but it is not stock relevant.
for more info : http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46b/helpdata/en/60/64cae6d9b311d1953a00a0c930e04c/content.htm

Different Method to valuate sales order stock

Dear expert,
     I came across a problem and I need your help:
     Scenario: Make-To-Order production without sales order controlling. Uses standard price in material master record.
     As we know, There are a predefined sequence to valuate sales order stock: First, The system uses the standard price on the basis of your customer exit COPCP002 Material valuation for valuated sales order stock. If not defined COPCP002, Then, the system uses sales order costing. Then, the system determines the standard price using the production order cost estimate. At the end, the system determines that If you manufacture a material both for the make-to-stock-inventory and for the valuated sales order stock, the system reads the material master record of the collective requirements material.
     In SAP online Help, there is a note that: If you calculate the standard price of sales order stock in a preliminary cost estimate for the manufacturing order or use the price in the material master record, you cannot transfer cost component splits into COPA. This is my doubt: I don't know exactly where are the differences between sales orde costing and standard price in material mater to determine sales order stock.
     So, I have a question: What are the extract diffences between using sale order cost estimate and the standard price in the material master record to determine valuated sales order stock?
     Thanks for your help. Best regards,

What you said is exactly what I want! Very thankful for your help.
Yes, I have found that in EBEW table that standard price is valuated with preliminary cost estimate because I don't give a sales order cost estimate but I give an sales order stock in the customizing - requirement class. So, I have this question that how the sales order stock is determined.
In COPA customizing (COprofitability analysismaster datavaluationSet up valuation using material cost estimate), standard cost estimate or sales order cost estimate can be transferred into COPA value fields in our system.
But, I have still have a question: I found in our system, preliminary cost estimate in the linked production order is determined for valuation of sales order stock in EBEW table. As sap online help says, cost component splits can not be transferred to COPA.
So, according to SAP online help, I think what you said u201Cu2026..However , when we start thinking about the result of this cost to flow into COPA , this cannot happen as the Inventory was valued with a Preliminary csot estimate. So , the Online help says that it will not be able to transfer Result of Preliminary cost estimate into COPA for transferrring COGS details. System would always require a Standard cost estimate or a Sales order Cost estimate to flow Cost details into COPAu201D is correct.
But, in our system, cost component can be transferred into COPA!? When I create a sales billing (invoice) with tcode VF01, it can create a profitability analysis document (shown in VF03) which it had a cost component split for that material in the sales order stock valuated with the preliminary cost estimate. Or where is stored for the Make-to-Order materialu2019s cost component split in COPA?
That is the real point that confused me. Hope you can help me. Thanks very much.

Hi....i am getting error in creating stock(MB1C)

its giving me error" Combination of plant XXXX and material type finished product does not exist"
can any one plz help me on this..........thank youuuuu

Question is not in detail but you can try this
1>Before posting Stock first check the Posting Period for this month is opened or closed. If it is closed then ask your MM team member to open the current period.
2> If you are creating a Stock then you should use movement type 970.
3> Generally that error comes when assigned plant is not for your valid storage location. So check your storage location and plant by using MMBE .
4> you have to use valid batch for for current period.
Thanks,
Sugauli

Inter company STO issuing from Project Stock

Hello Experts,
In my Scenario, I have two plants A & B which are in two different company codes
Plant A raises an STO to receive materials from Plant B.
Plant A will receive the materials into unrestricted use stock, but Plant B should issue from valuated project stock (via outbound delivery).
This is necessary to keep accurate cost tracking. If Plant B moved the project stock to unrestricted stock first, then the moving average price could be affected before transferring to plant A.
Can anyone tell me if this is possible? I don't see stock type Q available for movement 643.
Does anyone have any other options to for intercompany transfer of project stock?
Regards,
Thomas

I opened a message with OSS and below is the response. Basically it cannot be done with the standard system. There is a note on how to modify your system, but it is only for a certain releases and would be considered a core mod.
"Dear customer,
Thank you very much for contacting SAP Global Support Center.
unfortunately the functionality you expect does not exist within the
standard SAP design.
note 92231 deal with a modification suggestion how to create such
movement types in some releases. As this is a modification note
originally proposed for special customers, there is no general
modification for all releases. As the tables has changed
in 46B, the modifications to create 643Q proposed by SAP via the
corresponding notes are not made for your release. We do as well not
plan to provide a new modification note at the moment.
The creation of the movement type is therefore possible but is
considered a modification to the system design."
I am sorry that I could not provide you with a more positive answer
this time but nevertheless can provide an accurate information. For
more information, please refer to note 11 and 83020.
Please notice that the reason for your request does not indicate any
possible errors in the SAP Software. Nevertheless we have at our
discretion decided to process your request within the framework of our
support. Please note that you are not entitled to free consultation in
similar future cases. In this case check the "The SAP Eco-System
in a nutshell" that explains how to find help to overcome this issue.
The document can be found at:
http://service.sap.com/~sapdownload/011000358700006245642006E/
Note 1054121.
I am sorry but this is the standard system design. Please confirm your
message at your earliest convenience.
In the end, my client has decided to transfer the project stock to unrestricted stock before doing the STO. Please be aware that this could affect moving average price before doing the transfer.

K stock first - WM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for