KEDR Not Maintainable in Production

Hello,
I've come across the situation where KEDR for COPA derivation rules are now not maintainable in a production system. This is apparently as of EHP7. Has anyone else had this experience?
Regards,
Tim

Hello Tim
It is standard behaviour of current EHP 7 SAP system that derivation rule in no longer
modifiable directly in production system
It is recommended that all
customers maintain it in development system and then transport it afterwards
into the productive system.
If you decide to revert this behaviour as
previously, you may modifiy the standard coding as per note
558156.
Please be informed that this will be a modification and if you
need further assisstence with the coding, please discuss with your local
consultant.
best regards,
Ronghua Fan

Similar Messages

  • How to maintain One product cost collector for multiple materials and configuration setting

    Hi experts,
    my requirement is that i want to maintain one product cost collector for multiple materials ans also i want to know the configuration setting for the same.
    I have used KKF6N but it is not working in my case. I went through KKF6M also but there i found multiple cost collectors.
    please guide me in the same.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi Shripad,
    you cannot assign same  Product cost collector to different material.
    Because you creating cost collector for material combination of material /production version,material /Bom Routing.
    so please create individual cost collector for every material.
    if you have any query kindly revert back.
    Please mark the answer as helpful if it is helpful to you.
    Because march 5 onwards scn has stopped awarding points to liked content.
    Starting now: No more points for likes on comments/replies
    Thanks & Regards
    Sandeep Kumar Praharaj

  • Fiscal year variant Z1 is not maintained for calendar year 2012 when loadin

    Dear Experts,
    We are working on BI7.0 extracting data from ECC 6.0.
    I am trying to load data from 0HR_PY_PP_1 which is a Self DataSource in our BW System (extracts data from 0EMPLOYEE and 0PERSON) to load into ZPA_C50 which is a copy of BCT InfoCube 0PAPA_C02 (Headcount).
    The data has come through into the PSA very well.
    However, DTP is throwing an error while loading 32242 records of data from PSA into ZPA_C50 InfoCube. The error details as below:
    Error while updating to target ZPA_C50 (type INFOCUBE)
    Fiscal year variant Z1 is not maintained for calendar year 2012     FGV     2
    Messages for 1 data records saved; request is red acc. to configuration
    Processing Terminated
    We are actually doing a Re-implementation of BW 3.0b in BI 7.0 Ehp1. We have imported Maintenance of Fiscal Year Variant from the BW 3.0b Production System. So this shouldn't be a problem I guess since I have also checked the setting in SPRO in BI 7.0 Development (New) System and they are looking good.
    Also, when I do a Filter on 0CALDAY in DTP from 01.01.1900 to 31.12.2010, the loads are working fine. I want the load to run without any Filters on 0CALDAY.
    Has anyone been in similar situation. How did you resolve this issue? Your time is very much appreciated.
    Thanks in advance.
    Chandu

    Dear Experts
    Thanks for your time.
    We have resolved this issue ourselves. We have maintained 'Shortened Fiscal Years' for 'Z1' and it is working fine now. Steps are as below:
    In BI Dev System -> SPRO -> SAP Reference IMG -> SAP Customizing Implementation Guide -> SAP NetWeaver -> Business Intelligence -> General BI Settings -> Maintain fiscal year variant -> Select 'Z1' Fiscal Year Variant and then DoubleClick on 'Shortened Fiscal Years' to set the Fisc Year Variant -> Save.
    The dataload should work fine now.
    Cheers,
    Chandu

  • Unit of measure is not maintained at level2 DSO

    Hi Experts,
    Unit of Measure is not maintained in level2 DSO.
    Scenario:
    We have a Product having values for different market in DSO UOM is Millions and Aggregated Value of that product is loaded in upper level DSO Unit of Measure is not maintained it shows blank.
    Solution: We have done selective deletion and uploaded again from the DSO where UOM is maintained correctly, Issue is resolved.
    We would like to know the cause of the issue.
    Please any let me know how to isolate the issue and if you have time let me call you to investigate further.
    Regards,
    Prem

    Hi Murali,
    UOM is maintained in level1 DSO correctly and for certain aggregated values it is not maintained and this very strange if we do manual upload data UOM is correct in Level2 DSO.
    I guess issue happening in regular data load or what so ever....
    We are trying to correct the data just by deleting and uploading again as this is permanent solution.
    If routines are the issue when we upload manually it shouldnt work but still working fine... this strange behaviour....
    please suggest and advise me... if required let me call you.
    Regards,
    Prem

  • Scheduling parameters are not defined for production orders

    Hi All,
             when i convert the planned order to production order  i got this massage popup coming  Scheduling parameters are not defined for production orders . please let me know this .

    Hi,
    One of major customization steps for the order type is missing. Run OPU3 and maintain settings for the order type you are using. You may copy settings from an older type.
    Regards.

  • Target cost and actual cost not picking in production order

    Hello,
    The target cost and actual cost is not updating in production order when I display it in CO03 in cost analysis.
    Even though we have maintained planned price in KP26.
    Please suggest how it can be populated.
    Best Regards,
    Tapan

    Hi Tapan
    For Target cost
    1. Your std cost must be released before Goods Receipt
    2. There must be goods receipt posted on the prod order
    3. You must calculate variances in KKS1/2
    For Actual Cost
    1. Post Goods receipt and Goods issues
    2. See if any mat movements are pending in COGI
    3. Ensure that operation is confirmed in PP and no entry is lying in COFC
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Modvat accounts not maintained for CEIV

    Dear Experts,
    We are getting error Modvat accounts not maintained for CEIV for excise group while cancelling excise invoice thru J1IH, cancel excise invoice.  The same error is not appearing in production system. its happening in development & acceptance system only. we have upgraded dev & acc system to support pack 16. please comment on this

    done

  • CONTROL DATA FOR ACTIVITY TYPE NOT MAINTAINED

    dear all
    i get this error when calculating production order cost
    control data for activity type 1000\4230\1420 not maintained for fiscal year 2007
    i hv maintained data in kp26
    can any one pl help. i am learnign sap pp and hv 4.7 version
    thanks and regards

    Dear Anshuman
    my prob. started during cost cal. in prod. order first error was version 0 not maintained for fiscal year 2007, THEN i maintained it in the path as told by you T code OKEQ.
    but after that error changed to CONTROL DATA FOR ACTIVITY TYPE NOT MAINTAINED ( 1000/4230/1420)
    i maintained data in kp26, but the error is still coming
    pl. suggest some solution as i am not able to proceed further.
    Thanks and regards
    Raj

  • Archiving control not maintained for CIR document .T-code MD82

    Hi All,
       I have archived sales order till 31/12/09 in the production system, but the Customer Independent Requirement that is
    CIR documents (MD82) are also there in vbak table ,now i have closed all the open document  by putting rejection reason.
    When i am trying to archive the document it is giving the error "Archiving control not maintained for the document" .please
    suggest where to maintain these archiving control and what is to be maintained.
    Thanks and Regards
    Abhilash Nayak

    Hi,
    Check your entries in tcode VORA.
    Regards,
    Eduardo

  • Procurement Type X , and not using mix product costing.

    Hi,
    Does anyone know if I set the procurement type X in the material master and not planning to do mix costing, is it possible to configure product costing to either internal or external cost estimate with procurement type X?

    Hi Alice,
    You can configure product costing even though you have not maintained costing view in the material master. I guess this is what you want to know.
    Please confirm.
    Regards,
    Satyajit

  • Work scheduling data of material  is not maintained

    Hi,,
    Work scheduling data of material SAREE is not maintained
        Message no. CO070
    Diagnosis
        You are trying to create a production order/process order for a material
        before the work scheduling data has been maintained.
    System Response
        The production order/process order has not been created.
    Procedure
        Maintain the data for material SAREE in the view for work scheduling in
        the material master.
    please kinldy help me to maintain this work scheduling data,. i cant find this in MM01.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    To maintain work scheduling view go to transaction code MM50 & then in selection fields select maintenance status as A (work scheduling, then enter plant no, material no & material type. After this execute this transaction.
    This will lead you to WS view, on work scheduling view maintain the details as needed.
    Hope this will resolve your problem.
    Best Regards,
    Avinash.

  • Close shop order Fiscal year variant B2 is not maintained for calendar year

    Hello,
    I know there are already some threads in the forum about this error, but I could not find an answer that works for me.
    Here is the scenario:
    We do want to close a production order in CO02. (CO02-functions-restrict processing-close).
    I get an error message u201CUnprocessed future change recs for order xxprevent del. flag/completionu201D
    Message no. CO688
    Transaction COFC shows me 6 errors (all the same) for this production order, I guess this might be the reason for the previous error:
    u201CFiscal year variant B2 is not maintained for calendar year 2006u201D
    When I now go into OB29, it shows entries for B2 for the year 2006, it has 12 periods, so it looks fine for me.
    Any suggestions?
    Thanks
    Anne

    - check out this note
    https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=487683
    Note 487683 - CO688 for 'complete technically' or set deletion flag
    Symptom
    An order should be technically completed or the deletion flag should be activated for the order.
    The action cannot be carried out since the system issues error message CO688 "Unprocessed future change recs for order & prevent deletion flag/completion".
    Even after you have started report CORUPROC for processing the unprocessed future change records, the action cannot be carried out.
    Other terms
    Archiving, complete technically,
    LÖVM, TABG, CO688, CO 688
    Reason and Prerequisites
    The action cannot be carried out since there are incorrect goods movements or incorrect actual costs for the order.However, this option is not mentioned in the long text of message CO688.
    Solution
    With the aid of Transactions COGI and COFC, you must check whether there are incorrect goods movements or incorrect actual costs for the order and you must post-process them.
    You can change the long text of the message as follows by using Transaction SE91 in order to add missing information:
    Diagnosis
    For the order, you must still process future change records or error records from the confirmation for confirmation processes.These are the possible confirmation processes:
    automatic goods receipt
    backflush
    actual cost determination
    data transfer to HR
    System activities
    For orders with confirmation processes to be post-processed, setting of the deletion flag or of status 'completed' has not been planned.
    Procedure
    You must process the unprocessed future change records with the help of
    predefined confirmation processes</> or
    with the aid of program CORUPROC, when you dispatch it in Customizing in a background job (dispatch background jobs: confirmation processes).
    You must check whether there are incorrect goods movements or incorrect actual cost determination for the order and you might have to post-process them:
    post-processing of incorrect goods movements</>
    post-processing of incorrect actual cost determinations</>

  • Error FGV002: Fiscal year variant & is not maintained for calendar year &

    Hi all,
    I am facing a unique problem in BW production. This is not happeneing in my Development.
    Whenever I goto table    "/BI0/SFISCPER" or do F4 on any Fiscal Year / Peiod field, I get the message " Error FGV002: Fiscal year variant R1 is not maintained for calendar year 2005"  . In my client R1 is Shortened Fiscal Year.  But we are not using this for year 2005 and most years. And the message is Type Error. I tried to debug but the code enters in 100 odd Function Modules and does not give any answer.
    My Finance Person has checked the settings in transaction SPRO > SAP Reference IMG > BW Customizing Implementation Guide > Business Information Warehouse > General BW Settings > Maintain Fiscal Year Variant). They are exactly identical to R/3 production setting.
    I have already done rebuild of Fiscal Year Variant from Source System by right clicking and loading data again.
    I am using BW 3.0B with Bi Content 3.1 . Please advise urgently.

    Hi TCS
    Please check these SAP notes in advance:
    1619823
    1835628
    Please advice if this helps.
    Regards
    PC

  • Phantom Assembly not exploding in production order

    Hi All,
    We are using phantom assembly as a BOM component.
    When we create a planed order from MD03 or MD02 and try to convert this planed order to production order the components of Phantom assembly are not explode in production order. When I tried with read PP master data option it get explode.
    Can you please let me know the reason?
    Thanks,
    SAP PQ

    Dear ,
    Couple of points on this issue which may help you understand the problem  : Bom Explosion With Phantom Assemblies will happen based on the following set up .
    1. You need to maintain the special procurement key-50 for the phantom Assembly
    in the MRP 2 View of the material master
    2. We can override the Phantom Assembly Setting by defining in SPRO --->
    Define Explosion Types so that MRP Creates Procurement Propasals for the
    Phantom Assembly itself.ie We can Swith off the Phantom Assembly Settings.
    This settting need to be defined in the BOM Item details screen in the Basic
    Data Tab Page under MRP Area.
    So check in your Bom whether switch off phantom assembly is defined.Make the Explosion Type-Blank
    3.Run MRP Single Item - Multi level - Transaction MD02 with Planning Mode 2 : 'Re-explode BOM and Routing'. The Phantom Item will now get exploded correctly in the Planned Order.
    4.Check the Validity of the BOM  and planning date
    5.Check the MRP4 set up in FG where you have kept the BOM/Routing selection
    6.Check wether dependent requirement  material master -MRP4 view -MRP  for Depent Requ should be blank .
    Check the above points and come back
    Regards
    JH
    Edited by: Jiaul Haque on Jun 14, 2010 2:15 PM
    Edited by: Jiaul Haque on Jun 14, 2010 2:18 PM

  • Componant cost not picking in production order

    Hi,
    Componanat cost is not picking in production order, when i m creating plan order to production order in make to order scenario.
    At the same time when i m creating production order by CO01 its working.
    Please let me know whats missing?
    Tara

    Hi,
    Thanks for sharing thoughts.
    Issue resolved.
    (SPRO-Sales and Distribution-Basic Functions-Account Assignment/Costing-Maintain Requirements Classes For Costing/Account Assignment-execute-for req class 040-Account assignment catagory -M & Valuation-M)
    Tara
    Edited by: tara  bhapkar on Jul 7, 2011 2:52 PM

Maybe you are looking for