MI20 Stock Data differs from MB52
Hi Gurus,
Here is the scenario:
As always we have performed the Annual Inventry count . We create Inventory with MI31, enter the count with MI04 and post difference with MI20 with the required approval authorization. The issue is that in most of the Codes, in MI20 transaction the Book quantity didn´t match with the stock in MB52 in count date.
The issue is that the Book Quantity was not taking the same Stock Quantity that was reflected in MB52
Of course, we were aware of the Movements between Count Date and Posting Date. As we entered the Count with MI04 on the 19th, the difference to be posted in each code was not affected by the Movements after the inventory count.
Could be a any reasonable reason that could justify the difference between MB52 Stock and Book Quantity in MI20?
Thanks
the inventory count had been carried out on the 19th of December while the difference was posted on the 20th of December.
The issue is that the Book Quantity was not taking the same Stock Quantity that was reflected in MB52 ( Z2410016 as example ). It is something that is really disturbing me, as I can´t find a reason for that.
Of course, we were aware of the Movements between Count Date and Posting Date.
Could be a any reasonable reason that could justify the difference between MB52 Stock and Book Quantity in MI20?
Similar Messages
-
Production finish date differs from basic finish date in backward schedulin
Hi, experts.
When i do scheduling the planned order,
production finish date differs from basic finish date in backward scheduling as below.
Scheduling: Backward
Basic finish date : 2010.01.22
Basic start date : 2010.01.21
Production finish date : 2010.01.23 09:00:00
Production start date ; 2010.01.22 03:57:09
*GR time : 0.
*Scheduling Margin key : 0.
I don't know why production finish date set in 2010.01.23 09:00. ( Basic finish date +1 day)
Please reply me.
Thanks.Dear Jong,
1) what is the parameter used in MRP run, Basic scheduling or lead time scheduling
2) you must find a exception Mssg for that plan order in MD04
3) basic scheduling take the time from material master & lead time scheduling will take time
from Routing
Regards
Madhu -
Invoice date different from GL date
I have several invoices where the GL Date is different from the Invoice Date. For example, the Invoice Date is 10-JUN-2002 and the GL Date is 01-JUL-2002. In all the invoices from another month, the Invoice Date is equal to GL Date. Anyone knows how can I fix this problem? Thanks
I think this problem is not a problem.
The date must be changed by the preparer -
Display only data different from the previous row
Hello,
I will use a simple example to explain what I would like to do with a query.
I have a table 'test' with 4 columns (col1, col2, col3, col4).
The table 'test' contains the following data:
A B C D
A E C D
A F G D
K F G HI would like to create a query ordered on the first column with the following result:
A B C D
E
F G
K HOnly data that are different from the previous row have to be displayed.
Do you have ideas on how to do this.
Thanks for your helpSQL> l
1 select
2 decode(a,lag(a) over (order by a),null,a) a,
3 decode(b,lag(b) over (order by a),null,b) b,
4 decode(c,lag(c) over (order by a),null,c) c,
5 decode(d,lag(d) over (order by a),null,d) d
6 from
7 (
8 select 'A' a,'B' b,'C' c , 'D' d from dual
9 union
10 select 'A' a,'E' b,'C' c , 'D' d from dual
11 union
12 select 'A' a,'F' b,'G' c , 'D' d from dual
13 union
14 select 'K' a,'F' b,'G' c , 'H' d from dual
15* )
SQL> /
A B C D
A B C D
E
F G
K H -
Order GI date different from Delivery Planned GI date
Hi Gurus, I noticed on one order-delivery that the order's GI date (in the schedule line) is different from the delivery's planned GI date. What could be the cause of that?
hello dear
System is nowhere stopping to change the planned GI date in billing. If orders schedule date is say 15.10.2007, i can change the planned GI date to 16.10.2007 and so the billing date also.
regards
Inder -
App launch date different from apperance date - help !
Hello
I have just searched and trawled through the forum and am unable to find a post regarding the launch date of an app being different from its actual appearance on the store.
My app launched yesterday 20th August but the date showing is the 14th August(date of submission) - hence it has not appeared in the new apps list - this is a little frustrating as it immediately receives no "free" publicity for a few hours whilst it is on the list of new applications.
Has anyone else experienced this yet? - as I seem to remember seing a post regarding tjis issue but cannot find it anymore. I have emailed the dev email and will await a reply but thought the collective knowledge of this forum may be able to help!
Regards
SteveSteve, any update on your date situation? Did you hear from Apple? What was the final outcome?
I'm having a similar problem outlined in this thread http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=8140542#8140542 -
How to check which column data differs from master table and archive table
Hi All,
i have two tables, table a (a1 number,a2 varchar2,a3 varchar2) and table b (b1 number,b2 varchar2,b3 varchar2).
how to check the data in both the table are same( including all columns).
data in a.a1 is same as b.b1 and a.a2 is same as b.b2 like that.
if they not same , i need to know which field differs.
Kindly Share ur ideas.887268 wrote:
thanks Sven W. ,
above reply clearly shows what my question is.
one column must be primary key, based on that key i need to find out which are the fields having different data..
im strugling with this, i tried the following already, but not able to get.
select the columns from a MINUS select the columns from b.
-- from this i can find whether the difference occurred or not.
but i cant able to get which are the fields value changed.Good. Then you would match the rows using the PK column and need to compare the columns
Instead of a MINUS + UNION ALL + MINUS we can now use a FULL OUTER JOIN
It is a little task to write out all column names, but 40 columns can be handled.
This statement would show you both tables with matching rows on the same line.
select a.*, b.*
from a
FULL OUTER JOIN b on a.id = b.idNow filter/check for mismatches
select case when a.col1 != b.col1 then 'COL1 value changed'
when a.col2 != b.col2 then 'COL2 value changed'
when a.col3 != b.col3 then 'COL3 value changed'
end as compare_result
,a.*, b.*
from a
FULL OUTER JOIN b on a.id = b.id
/* return only non matching columns */
where (a.col1,a.col2,a.col3) != (b.col1,b.col2,b.col3) You might need to add nvls to take care of null values. Test this!
Another way could be to group upon the primary key
select *
from (
select id
,count(distinct col1)-1 cnt_col1
,count(distinct col2)-1 cnt_col2
,count(distinct col3)-1 cnt_col3
from
select 'A' source, a.*
from a
UNION ALL
select 'B' source, b.*
from b)
group by ID
/* only records with differences */
where 1 in (cnt_col1, cnt_col2, cnt_col3)
;The count columns will hold either 1 or 0. If it is 1 then this column has a difference. -
PA date different from GL date in cost distribution lines all table
Setup is "maintain common pa and gl periods" is NOT checked, system profile option 'PA: Enable Enhanced Period Processing' is set to 'Yes'. and expenditure cycle start date is Monday. Converting costs back to 2001, all periods, both PA and GL are open. Using Sundays in the last FULL week of the month as the expenditure date, get matching PA and GL dates for all conversion costs prior to 2008. 2008 costs are all coming in with a PA date of 01-oct-2008. Why is 2008 acting differently than prior to 2008?
PA_DATE GL_DATE EXPENDITURE_ITEM_DATE
30-Dec-07 30-Dec-07 30-Dec-07
31-Dec-06 31-Dec-06 31-Dec-06
25-Dec-05 25-Dec-05 25-Dec-05
26-Dec-04 26-Dec-04 26-Dec-04
30-Dec-01 30-Dec-01 30-Dec-01
1-Oct-08 31-Aug-08 31-Aug-08
1-Oct-08 27-Jul-08 27-Jul-08
1-Oct-08 29-Jun-08 29-Jun-08
1-Oct-08 25-May-08 25-May-08
1-Oct-08 27-Apr-08 27-Apr-08
1-Oct-08 30-Mar-08 30-Mar-08
1-Oct-08 27-Jan-08 27-Jan-08
Thanks for any help!
MissyHi
I suggest you check again the atatus of your PA periods for the 2008 year.
From the results I would have suspected all PA periods between Jan and Sep 2008 are closed.
Dina -
How to set DB date different from Host date?
DBAs,
I've got a requirement to have 1 database in sync with a development region of the mainframe. This date is 2 months in the past. Is it possible to have the database have a different date/time than the OS time on the unix server? One option (more expensive) is for the db to have it's own server (or vmware) where we just reset the OS time. We're on 9i on aix.
Thanks
AlexIn my Oracle 7(.0) days, there was, if I am not mistaken, an database parameter for setting a default date, but I have no idea if this is still possible...Checked the 7.3 manuals, but can't find anything, that triggers my mind. Can be that it is still around, but in that case probably went underground (became an hidden / _$ parameter). By the way, this is a typical question for the oracle-l forum on www.freelists.org
Message was edited by:
mgralike -
Medical Collection date different from actual EOB date Central State Recovery
Hi, New posting to this particular forum as I usually stay on the Mortgage site, but this issue might be more suited and possibly get an answer here. So I have been disputing the charge for the last two years, but since I am trying to buy a house, I called and asked if they would do a PFD and from others' posts I knew that this particular company would not do so. It was just $25.20 so I paid it. The issue is that the date they say the EOB shows is Sept 2011 but the date the CA reports on my report is 02/21/2012. Is that something that can be changed or am I stuck with that date until June 2018? They do not report to TU just EX and EQ. Any advise would be appreciated. Equifax FICO 850/ Score 5 710TU 826/ Score 4 797Experian 840/ Score 2 699
lilbitinok wrote:
Hi, New posting to this particular forum as I usually stay on the Mortgage site, but this issue might be more suited and possibly get an answer here. So I have been disputing the charge for the last two years, but since I am trying to buy a house, I called and asked if they would do a PFD and from others' posts I knew that this particular company would not do so. It was just $25.20 so I paid it. The issue is that the date they say the EOB shows is Sept 2011 but the date the CA reports on my report is 02/21/2012. Is that something that can be changed or am I stuck with that date until June 2018? They do not report to TU just EX and EQ. Any advise would be appreciated. Equifax FICO 850/ Score 5 710TU 826/ Score 4 797Experian 840/ Score 2 699If the EOB is the billing date from the OC the date in 2012 is the date the CA got the collection, they still have to operate from the accounts DoFD as far as the max time it can remain on file. I would start a GW letter campaign to the CA asking for its removal. -
GL date different from Payment Date
Dear All,
I got problem related to Oracle Payables. I wonder how this happen. The problem appears as below:
In practices, GL Date will default to be same as Payment Date. Suddently the GL date had changed to 1st dec (which is suppose to be 4th Nov). I had checked one payments at TEST instant, GL Date & Payment Date are same (eg: Payment date=04-NOV-2008, GL Date=04-NOV-2008). However, when check the same payment at PROD instant, GL Date previously generated on 4-NOV-2008 had changed to 1st Dec 2008.
Is it possible to change back the date to the original date which is the Payment Date?
Please advices
Thank you.Dear All,
Just to share explanation received from Metalink FYI;
A : As per standard functionality, once the transactions are sweeped to next period the date will also change to 1st day of next open period. So if the invoices for which the GL date has changed in production are the one which were found in unaccounted transaction report during period closure process, then this is intended functionality.
Q : Is it possible if we disable the function, so that the GL Date will not change to next open period when sweep activity is done.
A : The reason for including this functionality is to facilitate the period end closure process even when all the transactions are not complete in AP. The system warns you to either correct and complete the transactions in current or Sweep them to next period. If you disable this feature you cannot close the period as unless you complete all the transaction in Payables. This is not advisible. Rest would be the business decision.
Thank you.
Regards
Edited by: mish on Dec 24, 2008 5:29 PM -
BaseLine date different from Terms Of Payment Date
Hi,
My client posted 3 documents dated 23.12.2009,17.12.2009,14.12.2009 respectively. The terms of payment has been set to accept document date as default for the baseline date. This means that the baseline dates for the documents should be same as 23.12.2009,17.12.2009,14.12.2009 respectively. However, the system has set 31.12.2009 as baseline dates for all MIRO documents. I have already checked Terms Of Payment ,Vendor Master and the posted documents.
Can anyone please provide any clues to this problem?
Thanks In Advance
Regards,
Payal SaxenaHi Payal
Request you to check settings for PT in OBB8
Also, refer to this thread - Baseline date in payment terms_reply the question for FI experts
If the problem still persists, you will require a user exit.
Rgds,
Zub -
Data Differs From SOST and the Received Mail
hi experts,
I send a program as an HTML alert . But the problem is that sometimes the alert is not received Completely . Some columns are truncated or some rows are omitted where as if i check in SOST it is appearing Correctly , but when the mail is received , it is having the problem. Could some on help me on this please?.
with thanks in advance,
Syed Ibrahim GHi,
you say sometimes it's truncated.
What means sometimes ?
Is it depending on the receiver of the data or the program name or what else?
Regards,
Klaus -
I have made a burn folder with photos exported from I-photo. It now shows in information, that the date created and modified is different from the original digitized date. How can I get the original date to show in the info from Finder?
The Finder reports File information. The date and time of the photo are in the Photo's Exif metadata. The Finder has no awareness of this. All photos apps on any system do.
Regards
TD -
Project stock - sub-contracting - Challan matl is different from matl doc
Hi,
We have sub-contracted with project stock ( Special stock Q ) materials to SC vendor.
While doing challan reconciliation with J1IFQ , we are getting the error
" Challan material is different from material document"
We are on ECC 6 support pack level 16.
Please advise solution.
Rgds,
ManoharNumber ranges maintained for 57FC
Ser Grp No Year From To Current number
01 01 2009 0000000001 0000099999 226
11 01 2009 0000000001 0000199999 18
Is there a problem in this number range. For normal sub-contracting , we did not face any problem so far.
Please advise.
Rgds,
Manohar
Maybe you are looking for
-
How do I link to o/s ("html") files?
Hi <p> I would like to incorporate what I have now into my Apex application but am having a problem trying to decide how to make it part of the app. <p> I have a proc that reads my apex db to determine whether and what reminder letters need to be sen
-
If you use iTunes to burn Audible CDs you better hope the book is only one CD long. Otherwise iTunes craps-out without warning and cannot be easily restarted. It just goes to EOJ and pretends it's all done with the entire burn. Often this can cause (
-
Disable Google search history in Safari
Is there a way in Safari on a 3GS to disable storing search history? Every time I select the search box, I am presented with a list of several weeks worth of searches. I know I can clear the history if you access Settings-->Safari-->Clear History but
-
Hyperlink for an Object need to be open in a different window
Hi Guyz, I have a Crystal Report which has few sub reports. In one of the Sub Report I have created a Hyperlink for an object using the formula Editor. This report is viewed from a different Portal with the help of ASP Pages. For some reason when I
-
Passivate issue while applying viewCriteria on runtime
Hello, (ADF BC on jDev 11.1.2.2.0) Hoping someone can shed some light on this. (the issue is not how to do this, but why doing it like this is not working) Here goes : Supose, you need to list all employees from departmant 60 (considering HR schema)