Not calculating tax!

Hi freinds,
Whenever i am trying to give tax code in invoice, it is not calculating the tax and is giving a message "Customization for SWI1 j_1iindcus missing in the table"  where SWI1 is my company code. Can anybody tell what the problem is and how to rectify it?
Thanx

Hi,
this amy be the case:- Go to IMG -> Logistics - General->Tax on Goods Movements-> India-> Basic Settings-> Determination of Excise Duty-> Condition-Based Excise Determination-> Assign Tax Code to Company Codes
and check do tax codes been assigned to company codes.
Rgds
S

Similar Messages

  • BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST not calculating TAX

    Hi,
    I am using BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST for posting the FI document for RC type. I tried posting it normally and it posted correctly. But when i give some ACCOUNT TAX information, it is not calculating.
    Here is how I am filling the details.
    Header:
    BUS_ACT = RFBU.
    USERNAME = SY_UNAME.
    HEADER_TEXT = TEXT.
    COMP_CODE = BUKRS.
    DOC_DATE = 12/12/2011
    PSTNG_DATE = 12/05/2011.
    FIS_PERIOD = 00
    REF_DOC_NO = 9700000036.
    AC_DOC_NO = 9700000036.
    Account GL Table:.
    ITEMNO_ACC = 10.
    GL_ACCOUNT = 412010.
    DOC_TYPE = RC.
    COMP_CODE = RECN.
    FIS_PERIOD = 00.
    PSTNG_DATE = 12/05/2011
    TAX_CODE = TN
    TAXJURCODE = TN3707600
    COST CENTER = 107
    Account Receivable:
    ITEMNO_ACC = 20.
    CUSTOMER = 1126045
    COMP_CODE = RECN
    BLINE_DATE = 12/12/2011.
    PYMT_METH = B
    CURRENCY AMOUNT : 2 LINE ITEMS
    1ST LINE ITEM
    ITEMNO_ACC = 10
    CURRENCY = USD
    AMT_DOCCUR = 500.00-
    DISC_BASE = 500.00-.
    2ND LINE ITEM
    ITEMNO_ACC = 20
    CURRENCY = USD
    AMT_DOCCUR = 500.00
    AMT_BASE = 500.00.
    I did not enter the account tax table as I am not sure how to enter the date. But I know that the tax rate is 9.25% and for 500 the tax would be 42.33. I need to make sure that the BAPI posts the document as it posts from FB01 when we check the check box 'calculate tax'. Right now, with these details it is posting the data but not calculating the tax.
    Please help.
    Regards
    Guru
    Edited by: GuruCharan on Dec 15, 2011 6:28 PM

    Raymond,
    Thanks for the reply. I did read the notes you have suggested. They are quite informative but unfortunately -
    Note 367175 is related to the other BAPI`s. My issue is with the BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST.
    Note 487064 is related to the error when the tax amount is greater than the base amount.
    Since I am using the Acc document post BAPI, please help me understand how to fill in the data for ACCOUNT TAX table or post the document from the BAPI along with the tax as it does in FB01.
    Thanks Again,
    Regards,
    Guru.

  • Not calculating tax in invoice!

    Dear friends,
    I have created invoice, but it is not calculating the tax. What could be the possible reason and what could be the solution? What is the tax procedure used in this case?

    Hi tasleemarif,
                       first of all check whether you have assigned a tax code to your PO in the invoice tab in item details screen,if it is being already done check whether that tax code has been properly maintained in the FTXP tcode,again check while doing the MIRO proper tax code is selected in the TAX tab.Also dont forget to check the calculate tax check.hope,this will help you out.
                                                                                    regards,
                                                                                    ASHISH.

  • BSI not calculating Tax

    HI,
    When I run payroll, it gives a message
    1201
    THERE IS NO ACTIVE TAX FORMULA ON FILE TO PROCESS THE CENTRAL BUCKS S D 084 TAX
    FOR THIS DATE
    Can someone help me with this issue ?
    Thanks,
    Sesha.
    Edited by: Sesha Venkata on Feb 12, 2008 12:48 AM

    You wrote:
    In T5UTD, I have the following entries for PAAS
    PAAS Central Bucks S D 01 Withholding Tax 10/31/1993 12/31/9999
    PAAS Central Bucks S D 51 Employee Occupatio 01/02/2001 12/31/9999
    PAAS Central Bucks S D 84 Local Services Tax 01/02/2001 12/31/9999
    It doesn't let me delimit the entry for tax type 51. If you see in my other message, I mentioned the tables and entries that I updated. I don't understand why it isn't calculating taxes for 84.
    Quick question, for my own piece of mind, what TUB level are you on?
    I ask because I know through this process of OPT -> LST, that SAP and BSI have released several correction bulletins. To me, the tax type 84 entry with a begin of 01/02/2001 is wrong because the tax is effective 01-Jan-08.
    Anyway, don't delimit the entry in T5UTD, delimit the tax model entry on T5UTE.
    And another thing that I'm not sure I made clear(er) is that the message 1201 is a warning message. Payroll will still run, if anything, this message just indicates that your tax models need updating.
    Regards,
    Kevin

  • System Not Calculating Taxes for Slab-Men.

    Hi,
    Before Applying the note i created entry for men in T7INT1, although system created a work bench request but the entry for MEN was not reflecting in T7INT1, i am not able to locate it, now the Note is applied & the entries are present.but i want to delete the manually created entry.
    SL23 Income tax rates for men 01.04.2011 31.12.9999
    I believe system is not able to read the slab properly as there are 2 slabs with same charectristics.i want to delete the manully created entry, where can i locate it as it is not present in T7INT1.

    Hi
    Please update the SAP HR Patch level instead of changeing manually.
    This will reflecting in T7INT1.
    Thanks & Regards
    Vikram

  • Purchase Requisition not calculating tax

    Hi
    I have a problem with the requisitions,when we raise a requisition it is suppose to calculate tax(VAT) but for some requisitions it doen't,
    any idea

    Hello,
    Is it something like, you are getting the error while approving the requisition? If so what is the error?
    Whether the e-tax engine has been setup properly in your organization?
    Rgds,
    Jyoti

  • Tax not calculating in MIRO within a date range.

    Hi Experts ,
    We have created a tax code and assign its values in condition types under two separate Key Combination.
    1) Tax Classification : 4% ( Non Validity) , in access sequence exclusive indicator is set aganst it.
    2)  Tax Code : 4% (Valdity - Sept - till 9999), Exclusive indicator is not set against it.
    Issue is that when i create a PO ( at any date) system is picking up the taxes.
    Nom at the time of MIRO , if i post the MIRO before sept. system is allowing me to do so and calculate taxes correctly.
    But when i change the date to Sept the system does not calculate taxes.
    Even though the Tax Classification has more priority in access sequence compared to tax code , i am failed to understand why system is not calculating taxes.
    I have tried deleting conditions in tax code key combinations but still system is not calculating taxes in MIRO,
    Pls guide.
    Regards
    Honey

    Hi Ramesh ,
    i have done the same . Maintained he condition record via FV11. but system is not calculating tax for sept. month in MIRO.
    In PO tax calculation is perfect but in MIRO it is not calculating tax.( ticked calculate tax option also).

  • Income tax is not calculated After Total Income

    Dear All,
                        I am running my payroll but my Income tax is not calculating properly because when am seeing my log then i find my total income is calculated properly but after that my STANDARD DEDUCTION is not been happening according to the rule if the employe is men it should be deducted 150,000 but it's not happenings . In payroll log where i can see the this (STANDARD DEDUCTION)amount because am not able to find how much deduction is happenings.My employe joining date is 01.05.2009
    I am giving my salary components.
    Basic-19500
    HRA-13650
    Performance-15000
    LIC(IT0586 80C)-35215
    Tution Fee(IT0586 80 C)-16800
    Calculated PF-2340
    CAlcualtion is done on the basis of 11 month
    Gross Salary                   529,650.00
    Exemption U/S 10               107,250.00 (HRA Annual Ex)
    Balance                        422,400.00
    Incm under Hd Salary           422,400.00
    Gross Tot Income               422,400.00
    Agg of Chapter VI               77,755.00
    Total Income                   344,650.00 (Till Here Every thng is fine From the next level am not able to identify  how much and which basis MY Standard deduction is calculated)
    Tax on total Income             52,395.00
    Tax payable and surcharg        53,967.00
    Income Tax                       4,906.00
    Kindly help me to resolve this issue am not a functional guy.
    Thanks
    Sandeep

    Dear Siknder ,
                               I alredy check in it0002 it male.
    I want to know how should i check in my payroll log what calculation is happening after my total income get.
    And also how i can identify which finacial year calculation is been performed.

  • Tax not calculating in PO

    HI MM Gurus,
    I have maintained the necessary condition type in ZTAXIN (Copy of TAXINN) Procedure for Surcharge which is calculating on VAT 12.5% for Haryana State. System is not calculating for this condition type but system is calculating Taxes for other condition types.
    I have checked in FV12 also, records are exists. I have also checked in Tax condition type it is also showing the records for access.
    When i am checking analysis for Tax Procedure for Surcharge condition it is showing error as - "Condition record exists (Manually removed)".
    Kindly help me to resolve this issue.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Neeraj Saini

    Hi, Neeraj
    The purchase order you are talking of, was it created before this changes were carried out? If so, this changes will not get effected. in this case create a New purchase order.
    Even after this if the error exists then check the following:
    1. The condition type should be a copy of VAT condition type.
    2. The condition type should of category "Tax".
    3. Check there is no conflict of condition records, try to maintain condition Record using the same acces as that of VAT.
    4. Use the same Tax Code as that of VAT condition type.
    Hope this will correct your problem.
    Regards

  • Tax not calculated in MIRO for the condition type JVCD

    Hi,
    We made some new different tax code and attached with JVCD , its calculating in PO but in MIRO calculation part not done but for other condition type ,JVRD,JVRN system calculating well...
    Please tell me some way why not system calculating in case of JVCD and JVCN for capital case..
    Thanks in Advance,
    Dharmveer

    Hi,
    We totally agreed with you and already we checked our configuration part is OK.Actually we want to map some process where we captured excise in GR but no need to take credit i.e. to post the excise in J1IEX,so we do not have to post our cenvat/modvat entry in MIRO but we need to calculate VAT whether it is deductible or non deductible.So far this thing is concerned,we made separate tax code which we use at time of MIRO posting and in configuration we did not attached the tax code in logitics-basic excise -assign to company code. Because once we attached here , system asking to make to pass furst RG part2 entry then it allows to post MIRO entry which we do not want .So please understand this scenario is different and we got the success for JVRN/JVRD for VAT but getting issue in case of capital VAT where system does not calculate tax for JVCN/JVCD .....where we want to process MIRO without posting J1IEX..
    Please thing and analyse ..give some helping response..
    Thanks,
    Dharmveer

  • Tax not calculating for loss of pay on the reduced basic pay

    Hi Experts,
    We have an employee who has LOP for five days and hence the basic pay is reduced. However for tax calculation the system is not considering the reduced basic pay, it is considering the actual basic pay.
    Eg
    Employee X has 5 day Loss Of Pay for the month of May.
    His actual Basic Pay is Rs 10,000
    His Basic pay after considering the 5 day loss of pay is Rs 8,000 for the month May
    For this particulat month system is calculating tax on actual Basic Pay i.e Rs 10,000. However we want the tax to be calculated on the reduced basic pay.
    Please provide with your valuable inputs.
    Thanks in Advance
    Koutilya

    Hi,
    Tax is not calculated on the month salary. It is the annual salary on which tax is computed and deducted.
    Annual salary gets stored in WT /410 (Regular Income) WT /411 (Irregular Income) and /413 (Perks).
    Annual Regular income is computed as under:
    Annual Reg Income = Regular Income Paid till last month + Regular Income for current month + Projected Regular income for balance months in the FY.
    Check the values of these WTs in your case. These must be different in May from the values in April.
    VK

  • F110-Withholding Tax Not Calculating

    Dear Gurus,
    For ceratin vendors in F110 system is not paying and in payment run log a msg is generated as--Internal Error:Doc Balance not zero.In one vendor there are 2 open items system is calculating WHT for one invoice correctly and showing in payment log for ther other other than posting its its showing at as a difference and sysing that doc balance is not zero.
    But when I simulated the 2 invoices separately in F-53 correct WHt is shown but unable to understand why Payment Prog is not calculating for one of the documents.
    My client is based out of Thailand both docs have same WHT code and and WHT Type that is at payment.Please help.
    Regards
    Prabin

    You are saying that the invoice which are created with tax codes creates problem when it is paid through F110 that too for certain vendors, right ?  Still I am asking, at the time of invoice booking (F-43), the document will have line items with payable amount, tax deductions, etc. right ?  This payable amount only will be selected in F110 run.  Why then you want to calculate TDS again in F110 ?  With regard to your query that it is happening for certain vendors, please check the proper tax codes have been incorporated in the masters and the liable bock check is ticked.

  • Extended Withholding Tax not calculating

    Hi
    We are in ECC 6.  In development system, we configured Extended Withhoding Tax for India and tested Vendor Invoice FB60.  It works perfectly without any problem.  It post separate line item for withholding tax as well.
    We moved the configuration to Test system, where it is not working at all.  All settings are as similar as development system.  Vendor master record also similar as development.  The document entered for testing is same as development.
    Why it is not calculating Withholding tax in Test system?  Is it any thing is to be done manually (like activation), table update.. in client independently?
    You suggestion is most impartant.
    Thanks
    Venkat

    Dear Venkatasubramanya,
    Check the following Master data in your Test System......
    1. Vendor Master Data: Check in Withholding tax tab, whether liable tick is activated or not for your Tax Codes
    2. Whether your Withholding tax types are oayment type or invoice type
    check in GL Master (Vendor Reco Account), Field Status Group, Whether Withholding tax fields are optional or not.
    Best Regards

  • F-47 Not Calculating Wh Tax

    Hi Gurus,
    I've decided to create this discussion because I couldn't find my solution as in previous thread :
    F-47 not calculating Withholding Tax
    I want to create posting with F-47 so that when I post with F-48 Withholding taxes will be deducted from the down payment.
    Below are the configuration in the system :
    1. Wh tax is defined as invoice only (not at payment).
    2. Extended wh tax is active and already assigned to company code with validity period still active
    3. Field status variant in OB41 for posting key 29, 39, 31, for taxes wh tax code and wh amount are opt. entry
    4. Field status variant in OB14 for field status group G026, G067, and those related to my recon account for wh tx code and wh amount are opt. entry
    When I post with normal invoice FB60, the wh tax is calculated, but when using DP request or special gl down payment, the wh tax is not calculated, SAP gives message "Withholding tax information is missing from the line item.
    I have also check and apply solution in notes 1626838 - WT pop up not appear, but all of them is not solving my issue.
    I need to activate withholding tax with spc gl, Is there any steps that I missing ?
    Thank you.

    Hi
    Please see below path for config
    Defined Tax type
    Tax code for Payment tax type
    assign to company code
    Assoign GL code for both Invoice and payment Withholding tax .
    many Thanks

  • TAX not Calculating for Unplanned Delivery cost in MIRO

    Dear All,
    I am having an issue with Unplanned delivery cost in MIRO,
    We have to do an accounting of a invoice/PO which contains in addition to actual Value the Unplanned Delivery cost also, and for which also the TAXes also applicable with ED 10% and ECess 2%,SHcess 1% ,
    Now in MIRO if i want to enter these Packing and forwarding chanrges in Unplanned delivery cost, but the TAX rates is not calculating for the same.
    The TAX rates are calculating only for the values other than Unplanned delivery cost.
    What i want TAX also need to be calculate based on the TAX code choosen in MIRO or as flow that of PO.
    I have checked in OMR2, there we have mentioned Default Unplanned delivery cost tax code as ED NIL.
    Can any where in the setting we can say by default the TAX rates should calculate as that of PO or whatever TAX codes we have choosen in MIRO.
    How to achive this, pl help.
    Regards,
    Nagaraj S

    hi
    the screen shot i sent is also of 4.7E
    now u can check OMR2 for default tax code for unplanned delivery cost
    can u show us the screen shot of the details tab of MIRO
    also check in SPR>MM>LIV>Configure How Unplanned Delivery Costs Are Posted
    here what value u have maintained  ,we are using 2 as (2     Different G/L line)
    regards
    kunal
    Edited by: Kunal Ingale on May 19, 2010 6:18 AM

Maybe you are looking for