Obtain Instance Id # for SWI5 Mgr work items

Hi
I need to be able to determine what the instance id #'s are for work items that managers have showing in SWI5 transaction. I am looking to get a report that has both the work item # and the associated instance number it relates to. I know that I can manually get the instance # of the workflow by clicking on the work item in SWI5 and drilling down to see the information, but is there any way I can get a report that shows me the details ?
Any help would be most appreciated.
Many thanks
Nicola.

Hi Nicola ,
If you have the workflow id you can view the entire details in SWWWIHEAD table.
To check the status of the workflow you can view the details in SWW_OUTBOX table.
I think this tables will help you to find the status of the workflow.
Thanks & Regards,
Ganesh R K

Similar Messages

  • After "Configure Feature", "Changed By" field shows my name for most of work items

    I recently upgraded TFS from 2010 to 2012. And I am running "Configure Feature" for every project. The configuration ran successfully. However, when I run a query, the "Changed By" field shows my name for most of work items. I thought
    configuration should never touch the data. More interesting, I go to history of work items, there is no change by me at all. Now why did history and query show totally different data?
    Thanks.

    Hi Jason,
    You can create a new work item to have a check if the same issue occurrs. To configure features, you can refer to the links below to see if you configured correctly:
    https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff432837(v=vs.110).aspx
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudioalm/archive/2012/05/09/how-to-configure-features-for-dozens-of-team-projects.aspx
    Please elaborate more details about the configuration feature steps if the issue persists. You can also run TFS best practice analyzer to see if there configuration issues.
    Best regards,
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
    Click
    HERE to participate the survey.

  • RBBP_OFFLINE_EVAL No e-mails exist for execution of work items

    Hi ,
    We are trying to implement SRM offline approval. The system is able to send the email to the approvers, but when they click on approve, the work item does not get updated.
    When i try to run report RBBP_OFFLINE_EVAL it says that No e-mails exist for execution of work items. No Work Item Found for Processing. What do i need to check to resolve this. If I approve thru SRM, it is working.
    Thanks,
    Jograd

    Hi
    refer related links too
    SRM : Offline approval process
    Offline approval not working?
    Check WF-BATCH user id has email ID?
    regards
    Muthu
    Edited by: muthuraman on Aug 18, 2008 8:00 AM

  • Disable Reject Button for Invoice on Work Item Screen

    Hi! I know we can use the Dynamic Column configuration to disable and enable the Approve/Reject button on the Inbox screen where the approval work items are displayed. However, I would like to know whether it is possible to have only the Reject button disabled? Reason for asking this is a rejection reason needs to be maintained for the rejection. The check is in place if we reject the invoice from the detail screen. However, if we reject it from the Inbox screen, it will go through without any warning or error message. I have searched OSS notes but found nothing so am wondering whether this can be considered a bug or not. If not, then I want to know what solution option I have relating to this. I am thinking of either a repair to disable the button on the screen for invoice approval or find a why with the dynamic columns to do that.
    Appreciate any comments on the above.
    Cheers!
    SF

    No response

  • UWL for Manager : Multiple work items for approval

    Hi Experts, We have a scenario when the line manager is approving the leave workitems in his UWL. And the UWL has multiple  leave workitems pending for approval. When the line manager click on any of the work item in the UWL, The UWL opens the items which was first creared in the UWL rather than the one which the line manager clciked. Then line manager has to navigate to the desired work item by clicking on next button. Is their any funtionality / customization available to get only the work item which is clicked in the UWL. Please advise. Regards, IFF

    I had the same issue and spent a long time correcting it including opening a OSS request with sap.
    It took a combination of all almost all the notes above (1807724 is included in our current release so we didn't have to install).
    But nothing worked for us until SAP directed me to the following note http://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1733095 that was the final fix to all our problems.
    One other thing to note is from the time we implemented the correction for note: 1946640 had changed from its original so if you implemented it before revision 3 came out you may need to update.
    Hope this helps,
    Martha.

  • Options for leave request work items in ECC6

    We are upgrading our backend system from R/3 4.7 to ECC6. I am not very impressed with the leave request authorisation process and wondered if there are any other options open to us.
    In 4.7, leave requests were workflowed to the requester's manager with a subject like this:
    Process leave request from <fromdate> to <todate> submitted by <person>
    When the manager selected it, they only see that request.
    In ECC6 (using task 12300111 and the Webdynpro 'Leave Request: Approval') the subject in the inbox is;
    <person>'s Leave Request
    When the manager opens the item they see all leave request from all staff, despite this, they can only process one item at a time. Once completed, they are given an option to Approve Another Absence - but the link does not work. I can remove that link using ctrl-right-click, but was wondering;
    1 Has anyone got the "Approve Another Absence" link working when the iView is launched from the UWL?
    2 Has anyone managed to put the details of the request into the subject?
    3 Has anyone managed to setup bulk authorisation of multiple requests in one step?
    4 Has anyone managed to restrict the workitem to only display a single request?

    Bharghava.K,
    I've implemented a work around for this - I've added the following UWL configuration file as a high priority:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <!DOCTYPE UWLConfiguration PUBLIC '-//SAP//UWL1.0//EN' 'uwl_configuration.dtd'>
    <UWLConfiguration version="1.0">
      <ItemTypes>
        <ItemType name="uwl.task.webflow.TS12300097" connector="WebFlowConnector" defaultView="DefaultView" defaultAction="launchIView" executionMode="default">
          <ItemTypeCriteria externalType="TS12300097" connector="WebFlowConnector"/>
          <Actions>
            <Action name="launchIView" groupAction="" handler="IViewLauncher" returnToDetailViewAllowed="yes" launchInNewWindow="yes" launchNewWindowFeatures="resizable=yes,scrollbars=yes,status=yes,toolbar=no,menubar=no,location=no,directories=no">
              <Properties>
                <Property name="iview" value="pcd:portal_content/com.sap.pct/every_user/com.sap.pct.erp.ess.bp_folder/com.sap.pct.erp.ess.iviews/com.sap.pct.erp.ess.working_time/com.sap.pct.erp.ess.leaverequestapprover"/>
              </Properties>
              <Descriptions default="launchIView"/>
            </Action>
          </Actions>
        </ItemType>
      </ItemTypes>
    </UWLConfiguration>
    Check the "Leave Request: Apporval" iView's ID if you try this - I don't know if ours is in the 'standard' place within the PCD.

  • CcBPM- Error process instance and error work item

    Hi All,
       I i just listing donw my queries about ccBPM.
               1)  What is the difference betwen process instance and work item?
                       I am presuming that, during ccBPM runtime message creates process instance and one process instance can have n number work item. Pleae correct me if i am wrong.
             2) If one process instance is in error status, it means one of the work item is in error. is my undertanding right?
             3) How should i edit/delete work item?
             4) How should i edit/delete process instance?
    Thanks
    Rajesh

    1) What is the difference betwen process instance and work item?
    I am presuming that, during ccBPM runtime message creates process instance and one process instance can have n number work item. Pleae correct me if i am wrong.
    BPM comprises of many Steps. (Receive step, Send step, transform etc...) Durng runtime, A BPM is converted into SAP Workflow in the Background and gets executed. Hence all steps are referred to as WorkItems.
    YES. ccBPM runtime creates multiple instances.. one BPM instance for each inpu message
    2) If one process instance is in error status, it means one of the work item is in error. is my undertanding right?
    Each process instance is independent of the other. Sometimes, the workitems blokc the processing if the other. Hence when the workitems block the processing, they should be deleted using SWWL.
    3) How should i edit/delete work item?
    4) How should i edit/delete process instance?
    You cannot delete a process instance. But can delete the work items.
    -SM

  • Work items creating for GoodsMovement IDOCS

    Hi Friends,
    We have IDOC to File and File to IDOC scenario, we are able to post GRN files  into SAP successfully, but for some idocs , work items are creating  for some line items where there is error . After analysis we have come to know that there is some error in article or price is missing.
    what i would like to know is instead of creating idoc for some items success and some with work items ,can we restrict if there is error in any line item.
    for example:
    let us say if i have one  GRN file with 10 line items.when i post this File into SAP .. It post 7 items as success and for 3 items it creates workitems.
    1) Is there anyway i can restrict the entire idoc , instead of posting 7 items once and after re-processing 3 items in second one.?
    2) how to avoid creating work items?
    one more thing I have created a backgrounduser for PI while posting to SAP. Some articles are showing as article is locked by piuser.
    can anyone suggest how to overcome this..
    Regards,
    Suman

    Suman
    What is the Message type / IDOC type your are using? You should be able to create one single IDOC with multiple line items instead of one IDOC for each item, provided the header information for the material document is the same for all the line items. In most cases this is possible.
    Check your mapping in XI and see if you can club all the items in one single IDOC. Doing so will also prevent the material locked issue. But, point to note with this design is that you will be penalizing good records in your file just because one line item was in error.
    KK

  • Pulling Multiple Approver Names from Workflow Logs for One Work Item

    I have a workflow design which requires multiple approvals per single work item.  I happen to have another functional design that is also pulling data from those same workflow logs.  Assuming I have multiple approvals at various levels for a single work item which table do I need to reference along with which fields to reference the different approvers per level of approval?

    Hello,
    The same tables. The principle is the same, just more agents.
    regards
    Rick Bakker
    Hanabi Technology

  • Error in WEB IC FOR WORK ITEM "Choose an assignment reason"

    We are getting an error in WEB IC where user is trying to resubmit the work item by giving the resubmission date, re submission reason , Status, and sub status
    but when users are trying to save  it they are getting an error i.e. "Choose an assignment reason" and they are not able to complete the process
    I know there is config for maintaining "Define Reasons for Assignment of Work Items" in SPRO under work items, but this config is not applicable since we are not assigning work item to a new unit and/or a new collection specialist, or removing any assignment.  we are just re submitting the work items
    Any help on this will be highly appreciated.

    Hi,
    Just a thought - on a couple of my previous projects we had some custom CRM Fron-end validation between Work Item Sub Status and either re-assignment reason and/or Closing result code.
    Perhaps check with your Development support team to ensure no such cross-validation exists upon saving.
    Regards,
    Ivor Martin

  • WD for Java and UWL work items (Adobe HCMPF)

    Hi Experts,
    I am implementing the Adobe forms HCMPF from the HR Administartive Services BP based on  the 'old' WebDynrpo for Java. SAP references in SAPnote 1024326 that when the WD Java is preferred over the WD ABAP one can configure the Application Parameter "isEnabled=X" for the Java WD's.
    This application parameter works fine for iViews like Start Processes and Search Process. However, the problems come when you open the work item for approving/editing a form that is received in the UWL.
    These workitems call the WD application that is defined in ECC. However, they do not call an iView from the PCD but the application directly. Therefore I was not able to configure the Application Parameter "isEnabled=X" for these applications (eg sap.com/paasrformstep).
    Can anyone please help and explain how to set the application parameter property for applications that are called directly fron the UWL work items?
    Without this we can only start the processes but not contunue them after the workflow has started.
    You expertise is greatly appreciated and will be rewarded when helpful!
    Regards,
    Thomas

    Solution found.
    Edit the XML UWL configuration to inlcude the application property for the workflow work items in questions.

  • Need help in getting proposed approvers for a work item

    Hi All,
        We are trying to get the proposed approvers and the actual approver details for a particular work item.
    Before the work item is actioned we are able to see all the proposed agents for that particular work item.
    But once that work item is actioned then only the agen who has actioned on the work item is appearing in the list. All other agents are not appearing.
    For this we are using the FM BBP_WFL_DIN_APPR_WORKFLOW_GET.
    We have also tried some other FM's and tables, but none of them were helpfull.
    Please let us know if you know any table or FM or class which we can use to get these details.
    Scenario:
    Work Item: 12345    
    Before action on the work item
    Possible(Proposed) agents: Agent 1, Agent 2, Agent 3.
    Actual Agent: blank
    What we want, after action on the work item if "Agent 2" acts on that item.
    Possible(Proposed) agents: Agent 1, Agent 2, Agent 3.
    Actual Agent: Agent 2
    But what we are get is:
    Possible(Proposed) agents: Agent 2.
    Actual Agent: Agent 2
    Thanks a lot.
    Regards,
    Kranthi.

    Hi,
    What did you draw those lines with ???? Just a drawLine() command ????
    If so, it is very difficult to track the exact mouse coordinates that correspond to a click at a particular place and then place an 'X' or an 'O' there !!!!
    Try implementing it with 9 Buttons placed at those specific positions. In this case, it will be very simple to track the user's input when he clicks on any of those buttons...the implementation will become really simpler.
    Check it out !

  • How can I specify an area path for the work item created on build failure?

    In our department we are working with multiple build definitions for different parts of one Team project. We heavily use the Team Project feature. Teams are defined by area path nodes, so each team can only see it's area path. No one (except the admins)
    can see the root project node.
    When a build breaks, TFS generates a Bug. Unfortunately, this bug is assigned to the area path root node, so nobody can see the generated bug and act on it.
    We would prefer to specify the area path for the generated work item in the build definition (not template, but property of a build definition), as every build belongs exclusively to one team.
    I have found that you can populate fields of the generated work item by filling the "custom fields" of the "create work item" activity. But how do I set the area path as a parameter?
    Guenter

    Hi Cuenter, 
    Thanks for your post.
    You should set the value like below in that activity:
    New
    Dictionary(Of
    String,
    String)
    From {{"Area
    Path",
    "teamprojectname\areaname"}}
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
    Click
    HERE to participate the survey.

  • Reverse Costs for Project work item

    Good Day
    How do you reverse the costs for the project work item that has already been approved?
    Regards

    Good Day
    Thank you for your response, the problem has been resolved by reversing the hours captured not the costs. which someone else had authorisation to do which i didnt have.
    Regards

  • Validation Error when updating Feature work item to completed state?

    We are on the latest version of TFS 2013 and have customized process templates based off of the Scrum template.
    We have a custom workflow for the Feature work item type. I get an error when trying to update the state to custom done state of "Prod Deployment Successful". The error I receive is below:
    TF237165: Team Foundation could not update the work item because of a validation error on the server etc etc.
    I have TFS Admin rights as well as project and project collection Admin rights.
    Custom States:
    Planned
    Canceled
    On Hold
    In Progress
    Ready For QA
    QA Deployment Failed
    QA Deployment Successful
    Ready For Stage
    Stage Deployment Failed
    Stage Deployment Successful
    Ready For Prod
    Prod Deployment Failed
    Prod Deployment Successful
    Custom Workflow:
    "  "  TO    Planned
    Planned  TO  Canceled
    Planned  TO  On Hold
    Planned   TO  In Progress
    In Progress TO   On Hold
    In Progress TO   Ready For QA
    On Hold  TO  In Progress
    Ready For QA  TO  QA Deployment Failed
    Ready For QA  TO  QA Deployment Successful
    QA Deployment Failed  TO  Ready For QA
    QA Deployment Failed TO   In Progress
    QA Deployment Successful TO   Ready For Stage
    QA Deployment Successful  TO  Ready For Prod
    Ready For Stage TO   Stage Deployment Failed
    Ready For Stage  TO  Stage Deployment Successful
    Stage Deployment Failed TO   Ready For Stage
    Stage Deployment Failed TO   In Progress
    Stage Deployment Successful  TO  Ready For Prod
    Ready For Prod  TO  Prod Deployment Failed
    Ready For Prod  TO  Prod Deployment Successful
    Prod Deployment Failed  TO  Ready For Prod
    Prod Deployment Failed  TO  In Progress
    I have also updated the Process Configuration file to map the states to the meta states so I can show the custom states on the Feature board. The section in the process configuration file that relates to Feature is below:
    <States>
            <State type="Proposed" value="Planned" />
            <State type="InProgress" value="Canceled" />
            <State type="InProgress" value="On Hold" />
            <State type="InProgress" value="In Progress" />
            <State type="InProgress" value="Ready For QA" />
            <State type="InProgress" value="QA Deployment Failed" />
            <State type="InProgress" value="QA Deployment Successful" />
            <State type="InProgress" value="Ready For Stage" />
            <State type="InProgress" value="Stage Deployment Failed" />
            <State type="InProgress" value="Stage Deployment Successful" />
            <State type="InProgress" value="Ready For Prod" />
            <State type="InProgress" value="Prod Deployment Failed" />
            <State type="Complete" value="Prod Deployment Successful" />
          </States>
    The error ONLY happens when I try to update a Feature state to "Prod Deployment Successful". I have looked at other posts and searched the internet and have found no help for my exact issue in TFS 2013. For some
    reason, I can't update the state from "Ready For Prod" to "Prod Deployment Successful".  Does anyone have any ideas of what could be wrong or causing my issue?
    Thanks in advance!

    I finally figured out my issue and fixed it.
    I had to update a reference name in the WIT xml file to Common.BusinessValue instead of Closed.

Maybe you are looking for