Partial settlement & penalty for Consignment Liabilities

Hi buddies,
I have a question on consignment liabilities settlement.
Scenario -
Consignment PO, qty - 50 created,
MIGO - 101 'K' done for qty 50,
MIGO - 411 'K' or 201 'K' done for entire 50 qty.
In standard SAP 100 % liabilities are settled by MRKO. However, I want to settle liabilities in parts viz. 60 % in current month and remaining 40 % in next month. The second requirement is that I want to levy penalty of 10 % on Vendor. This is possible in case of standard PO by way of sebsequent credit but in case of consignment PO this is not possible since I am settling liabilities by MRKO. Is there any workaround for these two queries?
Cheers!
Sachin Narvekar

Penalty clarification -
If the vendor liability is 100 but the material is of poor quality I have to pay 90 to Vendor i.e. 10 is the penalty I am imposing. In case of normal PO I levy penalty to him by creating subsequent cerdit. How do I levy penalty in case of consignment PO?

Similar Messages

Change of Source Structure for Partial Settled WBS elements - CJ02

Hi
As per standard SAP, the change of source structure under settlement perameters of WBS element is not supported when the settlement of WBS element is done either partial / full.
However, the client needs this change by doing any Z-Development as one time activity (since the source structure was changed for certain WBS elements as per change in business process).
Can i Know procedure to do the Z development to modify the source structure for partial settled WBS elements and also let me know the any side effects in this regard.
Regards
Anil

Hi Anil,
I agree with Ajay. You can try to change it in Debugging mode.
The values are handed over from include LCJWBF5Q (form project_settle_single using)
Some customer have also made a modification as a permanent solution.
Unfortunately in the standard it is not possible.
regards Bernhard

Vendor Rebate for Partial Settlement

Hi gurus,
I need your help, I am new with some part of the Rebate process and this is my case. I have a rebate agreement where the validity date is 01.01.2009 to 31.12.2009.
We have many POs, GRs and IVs for the Vendor assigned to this agreement and the rebate agreement have one condition record with many discounts (like 10) with the validity date 01.01.2009 to 31.12.2009.
I can see the POs where the discount was applied.
The situation is that I want to execute the partial settlement for this agreement FOR today, transaction MER4.
Then, in the "Settlement date" field I have selected = 31.03.2009 and
I have the option "Perform settlement accounting" selected too (it is in the Control data:settlement run section).
But, the system is telling me "No rebate arrangement chosen" and I know that I have Invoice Verifications made, why I cannot do a partial settlement?
Could you help me please?
Kind regards,
SP
Edited by: SANDRA PALOMO on May 3, 2011 2:41 PM

Sandra,
I know this post is closed but seems like you worked on Vendor Rebate Process.I am working on this first time.I have following scenario
I have one vendor for which we like to have vendor rebate for some specific materials.. The rebate is 10% of purchases, accrued monthly, receive quarterly and we like the moving average price should be reduced by the 10% rebate.
Can you please give me some guidance ?

Settlement Status-05 (Dist. rule group specfied for partial settlement)

Hi all,
If we execute the report CJID, we see the settlement status 05(Dist. rule group specfied for partial settlement).
My query is what does settlement status 05 exactly means.
Regards,
Gagandeep Singh

HI gagandeep singh,
settlement status 05 could be your allocation structure.
or else can you explain more abt your query
vengaiah chowdary

Account postings for consignment

Dear experts,
Please explain me the account postings for consignment.
thanks in advance,

Hi,
Consignment
You manage material A from your vendor as consignment stock at a consignment price of $10/piece.
Goods Withdrawal
When you withdraw 100 pieces for consumption, the system makes a posting to the consumption account based on the consignment price. The offsetting entry is made to the account Liabilities from consignment stock.
Consignment and Pipeline Settlement
When the consignment withdrawals are settled, the liability created at the time of the withdrawal is cleared. The offsetting entry is posted to the vendor account.
The system determines which taxes are to be posted for each item from the consignment info record or pipeline info record.
When the system makes postings to the liabilities account, be they for withdrawals or for settlements, it creates the allocation number automatically from the material document number, so that the open items in Financial Accounting can be cleared.
Regards
Diwakar
Reward if useful

4.what accounts are generated for Non-Valuated material & for Consignment m

4.what accounts are generated for Non-Valuated material & for Consignment material?
please explain me.

Dear Srinivas,
Please find below the explanation about both materials in a simple manner.
"Non valuated material".(UNBW):
For this material type in the basic settings only Qty. update is active & no value update.
No accounting data is maintained in Material master hence stock values are not updated.This material is procured only with account assignment.
Consumption statistic is updated only after Goods Issue.Whenever material will come its value will be always go to consumption account.
Consignment Material :
In this case material is still owned by vendor & only kept in your premises. Liability only starts when you withdraw material from consignment stock or post it to your own valuated stock.Liabilities are generally settled monthly.
At GR wrt PO material is directly put to consignment stock of vendor.It is possible to post another GR into consignment stock.No valuation takes place during GR.
Once the material is withdrawn from consignment stock( For prod) it is valuated with the price of vendor in as per INFO record.
If useful reward points,
Vivek

Settlement Rule for Internal Order

Hi All
I have Maintained Settlement rule for Internal order as under
CAT - FXA
Settlement Receiver - Asset
% - 100
Settlement type - Full
Now after settlement of above Order in KO88 . I want again use above internal order. Hence i have trying to put Settlement rule 50% for some anther asset but system gave me following error. Please guide on this issue.
Total = 50.00%, ( Set.Type PER / Version / Actual settlement ), period 010/2011
Message no. KD042
Diagnosis
You have entered distribution rules which settle 50.00% in total. This applies for settlement view ( Set.Type PER / Version / Actual settlement ) in period 010/2011.
When checking the percentage total, the system found one of the following errors:
The total percentage for the distribution rules is more than 100%
The total percentage for the distribution rules is less than 100% and this is a rule for full settlement.
The total percentage for the distribution rules is less than 100% and the 100% check is switched on in the settlement profile.

Hi:
        Please refer to the contents of OSS Note 45612 - IM: pre-settlement does not work, or KD042... which states
"Symptom
    1. If a preliminary settlement rule (for example, to cost center) is entered for individual items of capital investment measures with line item management, this rule is not considered during periodic settlement. There is no settlement to cost centers.
    2. If you enter a final settlement rule for individual line items of investment measures with line item management for a partial capitalization (that is, the percentage rate is less than 100%), then you receive the unjustified error message KD042 "Total percent = xx%".
Additional key words
KOB5, CJ70, CJ88, CJ8G, KO88, KO8G, preliminary settlement, partial settlement, partial capitalization
Cause and prerequisites
    1. You did not enter the settlement type ACT in the preliminary settlement rule.
    You can check this in the Line Item Apportionment transaction by choosing the menu option "Goto" -> "Overview dist. rules" to display the distribution rule groups entered so far.
    The system displays rules which have no entry in the "SetTyp" field (settlement type, field name PERBZ).
    2. The check of the percentages is incorrect.
Solution
    1. Install the following correction. Afterwards reverse the incorrect settlement, re-enter the preliminary settlement rule and settle again.
    2. Install the following correction. Afterwards, you can maintain the settlement rule for the partial settlement.
    Note: If you want to use a default settlement rule (maintaining the settlement rule from the master data maintenance transaction), then you are required to distribute the line items at 100%. In order to carry out a partial capitalization (settlement of less than 100%), you have to use menu path "Actual postings -> Period-end closing -> Settlement -> Line item "
Regards

Issue regarding executing manual partial settlement

Hi guru:
When I am going to execute manual partial settlement via vo02 and try to change the agreement status to B,then enter shift+f12,the system said that manual payment is not allowed for this agreement type,how to fix?

And I tried to run vbof and input the rebate agreement to start,the systme indicated that new bonus procedure not active,what does it mean?

Manual accruals/ Partial settlement in rebates

Hi,
I have following questions sinc eiam doing rebates for first time.
1) in the billing document, the rebates are calculated as per the the accrual rates in rebates condition records. My question if the invoice is for Rs 100 and accrual rebate amt in invoice is rs 2. will the customer pay Rs 98 against this invoice of full Rs 100.
2) what happens during manual accruals. why a credit memo request is generated during manual accruals. what happens to accruals as per condition records.
3) what happens during partial settlement. do the accruals already poested gets reduced to the extent of amount of partial settlement. do manaul accruals have any role to play during partial settlement
4) what happens during final settlement. do manual accruals have any role to play during final settlement i.e. do they get reversed and what happens to accurals posted as per rebate conditon records.
regards
sachin

Dear Sachin,
1) in the billing document, the rebates are calculated as per the the accrual rates in rebates condition records. My question if the invoice is for Rs 100 and accrual rebate amt in invoice is rs 2. will the customer pay Rs 98 against this invoice of full Rs 100.
Ans --> Customer need to pay Rs 100 only , rebate amount will paied to the customer after completion of the rebate duration in between there will be partial settlement.
2) what happens during manual accruals. why a credit memo request is generated during manual accruals. what happens to accruals as per condition records.
Ans--> Manual Accruals
Use
Posting accruals manually can be useful in different situations such as:
Lump sum payments
Accruals correction
You can control at which time and for which amount the accruals should be posted.
You can build accruals for a particular condition record or reverse them in part or in full.
When you save the rebate agreement, the system will automatically create a credit memo request. The system uses this document to create a credit memo. When the credit memo is released, the accruals are posted to FI.
If you have posted accruals manually, but these have not been passed on to financial accounting, the manual accruals and manual payments in the rebate agreement are blocked.
3) what happens during partial settlement. do the accruals already poested gets reduced to the extent of amount of partial settlement. do manaul accruals have any role to play during partial settlement
Ans->Partial Settlement
Use
You can also partially settle a rebate agreement during its validity period. The amount to be paid can be limited in Customizing for Sales. Payments can be:
limited to the cumulative accruals of the condition record
limited to the amount that would be paid if final settlement were presently carried out
unlimited
You carry out partial settlement by using the manual payment screen within rebate agreement processing. On this screen you can specify the amount to be paid for each condition record.
The system will automatically create a credit memo request for the amounts specified.
It will also reverse the accruals with the credit memo if the rebate agreement type is configured accordingly. If the payment exceeds the recordu2019s accumulated accruals, the system will only reverse the accruals which are actually there.
The system gives you the opportunity to carry out additional partial settlements when previous partial settlements remain open in the form of credit memo requests or credit memos. The system always takes open documents into account when determining the maximum amount which you can pay.
When the system carries out final settlement for a rebate agreement, it takes all partial payments into account.
4) what happens during final settlement. do manual accruals have any role to play during final settlement i.e. do they get reversed and what happens to accurals posted as per rebate conditon records.
Ans-->Final settlement
Use
When you carry out final settlement of a rebate agreement, the system automatically
calculates the rebate based on the sales volume statistics or the lump sum
deducts any previously paid rebates
It then creates a credit memo request, and proposes the end date of the agreement validity period as the billing date.
The system also reverses any accruals that have been posted.
Depending on Customizing, when the system creates a credit memo request, the document is automatically blocked for billing. After approving the credit memo request, the person responsible can remove the billing block. You can then create the final credit memo.
When you want to search for credit memo requests during sales order processing, you can use the matchcode F "Credit memo request for rebate".
You can carry out final settlement of rebate agreements
automatically
Manually
as a background task (in batch)
Settling Single Rebate Agreements
You can carry out settlement directly from within a rebate agreement.
Before you save the rebate agreement you can still carry out changes to the credit memo request:
The credit memo request is only saved when you save the rebate agreement.
Carrying out Final Settlement as a Background Task
If the volume of your sales rebate processing is high, you can collectively process rebate settlements as a background task.
The following reports are available:
RV15C001
RV15C002
Your system administrator can use these reports to generate a list of rebate agreements, based on various selection criteria, such as rebate recipient, status of the agreement, and so on.
Background processing can then be carried out later. I.e., after the regular posting periods.
After a list is generated, the rebate agreements can be analyzed or processed for payment.
For more information about settling rebates as a background task, see your system administrator.
I hope it will help you,
Regards,
Murali.

How to settle the vendor consignment?

i make goods receipt and goods issue but when when i am trying to settle the vendor nothing process...any information?

Dear AMR,
how to settle the vendor consignment?
For consignment seetle ment you have to Run Tr.code; MRKO, make sure that you have valid consignment Info record , also chek in Vendor master data for control data ticket, and while runing the Tr.code ; MRKO you have ticked, Seelt tab ticked

Rebates - Partial Settlement

Hi, I need to partially settle an agreement but when i select create the credit memo, it creates a message. Message reads: The plant is missing for transaction xxxxx. I've checked the customers on the rebate condition as well as the materials and they all have plants linked. What else can I check?

Kindly refer SAP Note 728167 - Missing Plant in the enhanced rebate settlement
As per note, this can because of error can occur if you use common distribution channels for customer and material master data. The note recommends you to implement the attached source code corrections.
Hope it can assist you.
Thanks & Regards
JP

Assign Budget is Doubled after Partial settlement reversal

Dear Experts,
When i m creating Cj88 Partial settlement of Rs.100/- & revesrsed it because of wrong Asset Value date.
Again i done CJ88 for Rs.100/- with new Asset value date.
But after reversal of settlemet & again settlement, my assign budget amount getting doubled of settlement amount i.e. Rs.(100+100=200) i, that its blocking budget for of Rs.100/- extra.
Its booking doubled budget as same amount of settlement amount.
Please suggest, its happen in production & not allowing to create PO for balance budget.
Please help.
Thanks & Regards,
Amey

Hi,
Thanks for your reply,
I checked than availability control anaylsis,
I found this entries,
COSP 2011 22 0059000001 RMBE D INR                        24,517,023.30 INR
COSP 2011 21 0059000002 RMBA D INR                                 0.00 INR
COSP 2011 11 0020030001     0001322611 COIN D INR          ___41,282,596.54 INR___
COSP 2011 11 0020030001     0001322611 COIN C INR          20,641,298.27- INR
COSP 2011 04 0059000001     0001322611 COIN D INR          10,784,468.10 INR
COSP 2011 04 0059000001     0001322611 COIN C INR             245,626.18- INR
COSP 2011 04 0059000001     0001322611 COIN O INR          10,538,841.92- INR   S
COSP 2010 04 0059000001     0001322611 COIN D INR          10,102,456.35 INR
COSP 2010 04 0059000001     0001322611 COIN O INR          10,102,456.35- INR   S
In this entries Rs.41282596.54, is showing problem, Addition of Actual 41282596.54 + Commitmnet Rs.24517023 = Total Amount 65,799,619.84.
In actual amount should be Rs.20641298.27 instead of Rs.41282596.54 then it will show,
But when run same cyscle its showing propely in Develeopement & Quality, its showing same amount but Rs.412/82596.54 is not added in actual amount.
It should show addittion of 2451023.300+20641298.27 = 45158321.54
My actual amount should be 4518321.54.
Please suggest, why this amount is added in actual amount or assign amount.
thanks & reply,
arvind

Manually clearing for consignment liability account

Hi all,
we have to manually do a FI posting to clear the consignment liability account, but there are 2000 line items, so I'm wondering if there is any automatic clearing process like GR/IR clearing ( MR11) for consignment liability account? Or can we run a program to clear this account?
please advise.

Hi Anand,
I havn't got any solution on that, based on SAP notes 487162, the solution is:
In this case, you either must not use such taxes or you must carry out a manual clearing between the consignment liabilities account and a suitable account in FI using Transaction FB01 or FB60.
so I think this is our solution for now,I'll keep u update if we found a better solution.

Invoice verification(MIRO) for consignment

Dear ALL,
I have two questions about invoice verification.
1.Now we create PO for consignment material. For consignment material, we use MRKO to settle the GI and generate the AP. However, when we do IV via MIRO by selecting vendor, some consignment PO GR records also pop up. Can we hide those POs during invoice verification?
2.For some PO which IV is done, we can also display some blank items in MIRO, can we hids those items also?
Thanks,
Gary

Hi, all
Does anybody can answer my questions?
Thanks in advance,
Gary

List of Orders - Fully settled / Partially settled / Not yet settled

Hi All,
Is there any standard report which gives the list of all those PM orders which are related to settlement.
i.e. Fully settled / Partially settled / Not yet settled
I tried to see the report in IW39 by comparing the fields such as 'Total actual costs' and 'Total settlement', but the 'Total settlement' field is always having the value as 0.00, irrespective of whether the order was fully settled / partially settled / not yet settled.
Any help on this is appreciated.
Thanks in advance. JK

Fantastic Pete !
I was able to get the answer throughy the foll. T Code / Report:
1. KOC4: Order selection
2. S_ALR_87013015: List: Actual Debit/Credit
Many thanks for the help.
Best Regards
JK

Partial settlement & penalty for Consignment Liabilities

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for