Planned Overheads

Hi,
I want to know what is functionality of the overhead calculation transactions (CJ46,CJ47), after executing this overhead calculation transaction where can we view the oveerheads calculated.
Are these transactions used to calculate overheads only on planned values for project which is assigned via transaction CJR2.
Thanks & Regards,
Jatinder Bansal

Hi Jatinder,
Within period-end closing for Cost Center Accounting, period-related business transactions are executed after the period end. Overhead calculation is one such business transaction only.
You use overhead costing to allocate overhead through percentage-based or quantity-based overhead rates. The basis for the allocation are the primary cost elements that you post as overhead costs. In the manufacturing industry, for example, these are usually the labor and material costs
Transactions CJ46,CJ47 are used for overhead calculations of Project or WBS elements. You can calculate overhead for single or multiple objects. Collective processing is based on selection variants that are individually definable.
You can start overhead costing for test and forecast purposes without updating the overhead calculation. The system then calculates the overhead, without you having to update the object (such as, internal order, cost center, business process). This enables you to identify and correct any errors before the actual calculation (such as, an invalid overhead costing sheet in the master data, or missing percentage rates).
You can run overhead costing online or in the background without a display.
Hope this helps.
Regards
Tushar
PS : Reward points if you find answer useful.

Similar Messages

  • How to Close Planned Overhead Rates after production order/ CK40N

    Hi,
    While creating production order,it will pick planned overheads from Costing Sheet.After closing the production Oder,how will we close the planned overheads?
    For example: We have maintained the planned overheads as 3% in the costing sheet.Over a period of time we have observed the actual overheads is only 2%.How to deal with this in the system.In this case how to close the planned overheads which we got from costing sheet?
    Kindly advice me
    thanks
    Sunitha

    Hi,
    If i understand you correctly,currently your planned overhead rate is 3% and you wants to change to 2%.
    if this is the case goto your Overhead rate in configuration and copy overhead rate key which is with plan overhead type(2). and change 3% end as of today and copied one with new rate (e.g 2%) as of tomorrow and till end of life(12/31/9999)....
    hope this helps you.
    Thanks,
    Rau

  • How to Close Planned Overhead Rates(KP26) after CK40N -cost estimate

    HI,
    How to close the planned overhead rates which we have maintained in the KP26 transaction after excuting Material Cost estimate?
    Kindly advice me regarding the same.
    Thanks
    Sunitha

    Hi,
    Goto OKP1, enter your controlling area,version and fiscal year.then click on "PLAN"(F6) icon at your left side top.you will see transaction and period in new window.
    here you can check the boxes under particular period.
    Thanks,
    Rau

  • Suppiler Plan Overhead

    I have a question with regards to supplier plan overhead. One of the things the
    Forte Immersion Program taught us was to look for the Display project in non
    window projects. Seems like common sense why have it there if it is not
    required. I think the reason goes beyond that though and has something to do
    with overhead. I recently came back from a Java training course where the
    instructor explained that any class libraries that you import will not add any
    over head until you instanciate an object from that library. Is the same true
    with Forte? Regardless of how many supplier plans I have included, is there any
    overhead incurred? I have a feeling the answer is yes. If this is true then
    does the overhead become the overhaul size of the distribution (kbs) or is there
    performance overhead as well?
    Thanks in advance,
    Phil
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

    Hi,
    In fact, you will have all reccurent suppliers on your partitions if don't make any
    design. The granularity on Forte is the project (in R3). I think that the
    granularity in Java should be the component (I don't know well Java), but you may
    have some bottle neck problematic to resolve if the deployement is dynamic for
    instance. In Forte R4, I hope that the granularity should be the component (if I
    understood well it is in SynerJ).
    The reason you can have DisplayProject on the server side is often a problem of
    design : you have placed your business classes and your windows on the same project
    for instance (so you have DisplayProject as a supplier). So you will find the
    DisplayProject class definitions on your server partition.
    The dynamic load of definitions can be done on Forte using libraries for instance,
    but you will have constraints and a real design to do it. The best I found is to
    make a "publication" project containing the Business Class and Business Service
    definitions you will need. It can, then, be conditionned as a library. Then you will
    have this project as a supplier of the User project. And finally, if you need to use
    a Service object based on a Business Service definitions, you will use the name
    service to point to it from th client partition, but you will loose the auto-start
    of the partition. For the server partition you will only use it as a supplier an
    base your service objects on the classes it contains. You can find on my site
    http://perso.club-internet.fr/dnguyen/ a component (and a sample) on that subject.
    A big advantage of libraries, is that you are able to deploy your application by
    pieces (with a good configuration management of course!). This is the way Conductor
    works. An other big advantage is that you can design dynamic deployement (once more
    just like in Conductor). A big disadvantage, on the deployement part, is that you
    would need Tools to manage that "fluently" on the environment : be able to destroy
    automatically the libraries that are useless, be able to know who (which application
    or library) is using a library...
    Hope this helps,
    Daniel Nguyen
    Url : http://perso.club-internet.fr/dnguyen/
    [email protected] a &eacute;crit:
    I have a question with regards to supplier plan overhead. One of the things the
    Forte Immersion Program taught us was to look for the Display project in non
    window projects. Seems like common sense why have it there if it is not
    required. I think the reason goes beyond that though and has something to do
    with overhead. I recently came back from a Java training course where the
    instructor explained that any class libraries that you import will not add any
    over head until you instanciate an object from that library. Is the same true
    with Forte? Regardless of how many supplier plans I have included, is there any
    overhead incurred? I have a feeling the answer is yes. If this is true then
    does the overhead become the overhaul size of the distribution (kbs) or is there
    performance overhead as well?
    Thanks in advance,
    Phil
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>-
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

  • Plan Overhead Calculation for Project Definition

    Hi All,
    I have a requirement to calculate the Plan Overhead for the Project Def. (CJ46, CJ47).
    I have tried using BDC for CJ46 and CJ47 but Overhead cost is not reflecting in COSS table.
    I also tried using program RKAZCJ47 ( using SUBMIT statement ), which executes successfully and overhead cost is also calculated and can be verified thru entries in COSS table, but it displays a log which I am not able to bypass in background.
    I do not want to show this log to user.
    Helpp..

    Hi,
    In my development I need to call this program to calculate the plan overhead. So I used SUBMIT statement to execute this program and overhead is calculated and stored in COSS table. but this program displays the log using ALV and SPLITTER control after calculation which is displayed to user. I want to supress this log.
    This processing should execute in background without displaying any log.
    this submit call is written in enhancement for CJ40 which executes after user saves the cost planning
    regards
    Edited by: Shaurabh Pandey on Feb 19, 2010 12:47 PM

  • Planned overhead is calculating wrongly in CK11N run, it is just more than double

    Hi Gurus
    1) While running CK11N overhead cost is calculating wrongly on base (material price). In my case I have maintained 1% Overhead on raw material for Duty in cost sheet. In my case no routing, and my FG is getting produced by process order. My Raw material cost is showing Rs. 2,364.45 but my Duty is showing Rs. 48.73, When I run CK11N for Finished goods.
    When I Check the costing structure it is showing all the material for costing, if i drill down there it is calculating correctly for Raw materials. Say heavy furnace oil material cost is Rs. 36,140.16 /M.T and overhead is Rs. 361.40 and for all raw material it is calculating correct 1%. But for my finished goods it is just more than 2%.
    As per my understanding over head is calculating for RM once @ 1% and later material cost + overhead cost getting calculated by 1% again.
    Please see the attachment. I have furnished a statement for this also.
    2) Also Please tell me the T-Code for costing run as actual cost. and how can I show a comparison report on planned and actual report for a product costing.
    3) My scenario is this is a power generation Co. Not possible to maintain activity cost. What they want to do is. on the last day of a month they will take the trial balance for the plant/ business area and will set the percentage in cost sheet (Actual for current month / planned for next month) for admin, manpower and other costs based on raw material GL values.
    So I have created a cost sheet where I have maintained base and assigned those RM GL/ Cost elements and other costs I have maintained in cost sheet based on row No. 10 (base) and assigned secondary cost elements and percentages assigned as per overhead type and plant, in cost component structure I have maintained same cost elements as set earlier in cost sheet.
    Please find the file attached
    Please suggest me if I M wrong.
    Thanks & Regards
    Subrata

    Hi.
    In itemization of CK11N over head is showing correct. But the material cost for RM is already after charging overhead. I have checked the itemization of Process order there for the first material was Rs. 144.56, but in the itemization view of CK11N it is showing Rs.148.90/- That means exactly after adding 3% overhead which I maintained in cost sheet.
    Itemization of Ck11N
    Itemization of COR2
    Please Help
    Thanks & Regards
    Subrata

  • Planned Overhead Calculation in Production Order

    Dear Experts,
    I have created one costing sheet, with the following:
    1. Base has been taken as Expenses GL(Office Expenses)-Primary Cost.
    2. Overhead rate has been define 50% for both planned & actual with dependency as profit center(D080).
    3. Credit has been defined with scondary cost element with cost center.
    4. Assigned cost component with above secondary cost element in cost component structure.
    5. Assigned cost component structure in version.
    6. Assigned costing sheet in valuation variant
    7. Assigned valuation variant in costing sheet.
    I have posted the Fi document in the expense gl.But no values are coming in prodction order in costing.
    Please let me know if i have missed any thing. Thanks in Advance.
    Regards,
    Kapil

    Hi Srinivas,
    Thanks for your quick reply. I have tried with base with cost element category 43. But no valuea are coming. Please tell me how the overhed will be calculated on this base cost elements. On which amount system will calculate the planned & actual overheds.
    Regards,
    Kapil

  • Need tables to pick the planned overhead & labour cost

    I need the tables form where I can pick the planned labour & overhead cost for a production order.
    i want to calculate my planned labour cost for all operations in my production order. how can i retrive form the tables and how the actual planned cost gets calcualted. where can i see the overhed calcualtion of the material and labour.
    please suggest.
    venkatesh

    Hi venkatesh,
    There is a help transaction RKACSHOW, to display all the costs related information for a CO-Object, in your case the oder. The involved table name is listed indirectly too. For example COSSA for the table COSS, and COSPA for table COSP and so on.
    Kind regards,
    Zhenbo

  • Report on planned overheads

    Hi Experts
    I have used dedicated costing sheets for calculation of overhead costs on material. Ex: Freight 10%, Insurance 1%.
    However, these costs are added to basic cost in all the reports.
    Is there any report where i can see break up of overheads?
    In case, if need to develop custom report, may please suggest the tables to pull the breakup data.
    warm regards
    ramSiva

    Dear Ahmed
    Thanks for your suggestion.
    The value category wise report provides consolidated information
    However, to have a report as specified below (componentwise break up), need to go for custom development. Any suggestion?
    Comp-1 basic    xxxx
    "            tax        yyyy
    "            freight   zzzz
    Comp-2 basic   aaaa
    "            tax      bbbb
    "           freight cccc
    If this is the case, can you let me know the table where the break up of OH costs stored?
    warm regards
    ramSiva

  • Planned & Actual Overhead Rates

    Hello friends..
    In the costing sheet, under the percentage overhead rates..
    Can someone please tell me what is the basic difference between the Planned Overhead rate (Overhead type 2) and actual overhead rate (overhead type 1)?
    Please explain..
    Regards
    Shiv

    Well, usually we maintain the same percentage for both plan and actual. Just for appreciating the difference, I indicated to try with a different %. This could be having an use too, where the planning is done at beginning of the year and later in the year, you land up in under absorption, you may want to absorb more on production order, you could resort to.
    In cases of activity pricing, you can run an actual activity pricing, that can re-calculate the activities. But for indirect overheads, where costing sheets are used you can only change the actual (type 1) percentages.
    Well the purpose of standard costing is to set a standard and monitor the variances as we produce. Whatever changes to actuals are made, anyway will be disclosed during the variance calculation.

  • Planned values in RA

    Hi all,
    We have a problem with result analysis - planned values on secondary CEs (planned overheads) are not included in the total planned costs although the respective CEs are correctly assigned row IDs and relevant for RA. This appeared after upgrade. No ZXKG* enhancement in place. Any clue?
    thanks to all

    Hello Christian,
    It is the user outcome from post-upgrade testing. Found in KKA2 (single RA for WBS) - the cummulative planned costs in Plan data of valuation section (  C(p)  ) is less than the total planned values displayed in project infosystem and the difference is equal to the value on the secondary CE (type 43). This CE is assigned to ID row and have category K (costs relevant for wip) in OKG4. Verified for several WBS in 2 independent client so that it looks like userexit problem but there is no ZXKG* include.

  • Planned Order Rates

    We run detail scheduling for our plant. We often change the duration of the planned order to either run longer or slower than what was created by the system (based off of the rates). If we change the planned order quantity the rate of the planned order will change back to original and the duration will change based off the new planned order quantity. How can I prevent the rate from reverting back to its original rate if we decide we want to change the planned order quantity after the rate has been changed?
    Just in case you are wondering. We often change the duration of planned order or process order letu2019s say from 5 hrs to  8 hrs to fill in a shift and at the last minute we may decide to build more.
    Thanks
    Rob
    Thanks

    Hi,
    If i understand you correctly,currently your planned overhead rate is 3% and you wants to change to 2%.
    if this is the case goto your Overhead rate in configuration and copy overhead rate key which is with plan overhead type(2). and change 3% end as of today and copied one with new rate (e.g 2%) as of tomorrow and till end of life(12/31/9999)....
    hope this helps you.
    Thanks,
    Rau

  • How to Close Planned Over Heads in product costing

    HI,
    We are maintaining planned over heads through KP26 and Costing sheet.Kindly tell me how to close planned over head wether it is periodicall closing or other?
    Kindly provide me the guide lines  how to do this Planned overheads closing in the system?How many ways are there to close planned overheads in the system?
    Kindly adviice me?
    Thanks
    Sunitha

    Dear Sunitha,
    To run the Cost estimate or close the planned overhead KP26 and Costing Sheet is not enough you have to move forward and you need to define Cost component Structure (OKTZ) Path: SPRO > IMG > Controlling > Product Cost Controlling > Product Cost Planning > Basic Setting for Material Costing > Define Cost Component Structure. After maintaining cost component structure you need to define Costing variant T.code OKKN Path: SPRO > IMG > Controlling > Product Cost Controlling > Product Cost Planning > Material Cost Estimate with Quantity Structure . Here you copy PPC1 standard and create your own costing Variant.
    After Maintaining the Configuration go to T.code CK11n and run your costing and if it is correct then save it. To update Price in MM run T.code CK24 and release Material and update it.
    thx.
    Ganpat

  • Actual Overhead Cost Splitting

    Dear All,
    We have 5 direct activity types and  3 overhead activity types in the system.
    Plan Overhead  cost splitted perfectly  aginst the 5 direct activity types based on the activity quantity,
    but when it comes to actual splitting:
    1.the system splitting the cost eually in NEGATIVE  among the 5 direct activity types instaed of splitting to 3 overhead activity types
    2. system considering the all direct activity cost as part of one overhead activity types.
    I am unable to understand how the system is behaving while splitting actual overhead costs to direct activity types
    Can sombody throw any light on this issue.
    Regards
    SU

    Dear Mr Ajay,
    Can you please help me on this issue.
    Regards
    Su

  • Overhead loading in Inventory

    HI Gurus,
    I want to view the overhead expenses in MIGO -> FI documents view.Actually this should happen after completing production cycle (assume that creation of material, BOM, routing, costing run, product cost collector and MFBF transaction) for a finished goods.
    I have already created activity types and costing sheet for overhead expenses.
    Please help me.
    Thanks in advance
    Mohdsams

    Hi,
    I understand that you have done the actual overhead calculation aginst the Product Cost Collector for the Finished Goods.
    You will be taking these goods into stores using Transaction MIGO and you wanted to see the Overhead costs seperately in the FI document which got posted to update the Finished Goods Account.
    Normally you will not be able to see the overhead costs in the FI document as FI will be updated with the sum of the Standard Cost (assuming S price) in total at the time of Goods Receipt.
    However, the actual overhead costs can be seen CO line items for the PCC order (KOB1) and the Planned overhead costs can be seen in the Cost Estimate.
    Hope this clarifies your question.
    Regards
    Umapathi G

Maybe you are looking for