Post advertising costs as per product lines

i need to capture cost and revenue as per the product lines(divisions in sd) for tangilble and intangible goods, if i add more profit centers based on product lines then i need to create at least 96 more profit centers.
is there a possibility to generate a report through sd for product line wise report where the cost of goods sold and revenues can b captured product line wise ?

Hi,
I don't think you can get such a report out of standard SAP SD module. What does a Product line represent in SD? A sales area? As you know, Revenue is stored PR00 (usually) conditon type and COGS is stored in VPRS condition type, you could consider creating a custom ABAP report to get margin report based on Product line using these details (table VBAP, KONP etc.,).
Othewise, if CO-PA is an option which you could explore, then suggest CO-PA, for a more flexible/granular reporting.
But, I did not understand the relevance of your thread subject 'post advertising costs as per product lines' with your post. So, as per you, is 'Advertising cost' and COGS are same?
Hope this helps.

Similar Messages

Post to Cost Centers on Production Order Backflush

I have a question.
Is it possible to post Goods Issue (Backflush) of components to a Cost Center when doing this via the Production Order Confirmation?
Normally, when the components of a Production Order are backflushed, instead of posting to a cost center, they post to the Production Order.
My intention is to use the Cost Center from the Work Center assigned to the Operation in question.
Is this possible?

dear Fernando,
the cost center which u r using for the work center to capture the operation cost only. Ur GI is taking automaticaly with ur confirmation, and goods are getting posted to order. finally the cost which is costing for that work center usage is also go order only.
if u dont want material cost to flow to order u tick all for all component materials as bulk material in MRP view and issue material aganist cost center in MB1A with mov. type 201 and do the confirmation, so GI will not take place to order.
i hope this will clear ur doubt
sree

Integration between Product line costing/schedule/risk/pricing and Finance

Hi SD Gurus
Anybody pls help me ,
" Bidding integration between Product line costing/schedule/risk/pricing and Finance business plans ".-- Fixing Core Phase.
Pls send me Business process for this Pain Area.
Very Urgent.
Thanking you
with regards
pawan

HI Gowri
Regarding products, those are not created in the cloud. In regards to what data is unidirectional versus bi-directional the discussion normally focuses on who owns the data. Products aren't owned by the sales or service teams, they are normally owned by a master data function. Products are unidrectional from ERP to Cloud for customer. Review our golden deck, listed in the how-to guide blog to understand what data is integrated.
http://scn.sap.com/community/cloud-for-customer/blog/2014/03/27/sap-cloud-for-customer-integration-with-erp-and-crm-how-to-guides-and-e-learning
-ginger

Maintenance cost per production output

Dear All
I have to create report based on Maintaince cost per production output
and this report is company code wise and Fiscal year period wise ,
now i got two different cubes from where i can get that cost
1) 0PM_C01 for Maintenance Cost
2) 0PC_C01 or IC_C03 for Production output in tonnes

Hi,
If the selections used for the query are available in both the cubes,ie company code and fiscal year, then just create a multi cube over it containing both maintenance cost and production output. Map it to the correct fields from the cube and create a report with formula to calculate maintenance cost per production using maintenance cost from 0PM_C01 and production output from 0PC_C01 or IC_C03.
Regards ,
Shyam.

Wrong selection of Production line in MFBF.

Hi PP Gurus,
We are having one SFG say 'X' containing three production version say 001,002, and 003 for production line PL-1000, PL-2000, and PL3000 with same Receiving storage location. We are usingh standard REM profile 0002-Final backflush w. activities with all other PP master data correctly.
While doing backflush for production version 001 system is giving right Production line i.e. PL-1000 for posting activities. But we are trying for the same for Production version 002 or 003 system is though populating/exploding proper/right BOm as per production version but it is giving production line 'PL-1000' for these versi

Dear Arbaba,
Check with this & let me know where you are struck up.
1.Material X(FERT) initially with BOM Alt1 & Rate routing 1 or say (prod.Line 1) I create a Production
version >product Cost Collector>Pre.Cost Estimate-->Data saved.
Now say in REM profile 0001---> 0001 - GI backflush at GR Posting & for cost Accounting the radio button
for Backflush using standard cost estimate for the material.Now let's assume initially this REM profile is
assigned in the material master.
2.I'm creating a different Rate routing and assigning Prod.Line2 for this.--->second production version --->
product Cost Collector>pre.Cost Estimate->Data Saved.
3.Now create a new REM profile say 0004 - with GI backflush at GR Posting & for cost accounting select
the radio button Using Data from Preliminary Costing for Product Cost Collector.
4.Now assign this new REM profile in the material Master say 0004 and after that check in MFBF,select
the respective production version and check whether you are getting the proper result.
5.A material can have only one standard cost estimate made out of a BOM & routing combination.So it
has happened through your production version 1(where prod.Line1 is assigned).Now suppose if you want to
doa production booking using prod.version2 whose manufacturing cost will differ from prod version1,so
that's the reason I'm asking you to change the REM profile which will to take the cost from Pre.Costing
from the Product Cost collector.(As per the new REM profile will to do the production confirmation manually
selecting the prod.version).
Check & revert back.
Regards
Mangalraj.S

WIP configuration - GL for WIP - Product Line wise

Dear All
Is there a way to maintain Fl accounts product line wise to configure WIP. i.e.: we have 4 different production line for different products. Currently we assigned common GL account against cost elements.
Thanks
MKJ

Hi
If you are asking for Separate GL Accounts for Posting in FI - Its not possible
In CO, you can manage separate secondary cost elements (Catg 31) by creating Separate Line ID and RA Key as per your Product Line
In BADI Workorder_update, you can write a logic to default an RA Key in the Prod order depending on prod line
br, Ajay M

Use of template using CPT1 for charging an additional cost to the product

Hello,
I'm trying to charge an additional cost burden to the cost of my product for every base unit produced. (cost estimate)
I have created a template using transaction CPT1 with sender as Cost Center / Activity Type in environment 001
The activity type is measured in EA (Eaches) while we make our product in boxes (Product base unit of measure is 'Boxes') with say 20 Eaches going into a Box
I have maintained an activity price using transaction KP26 at say $0.55 per Each
I have assigned this template to my costing sheet , valuation area and overhead key using transaction KTPF
When I now cost the material for costing lot size of a 1000 boxes, it still charges the product with the activity price per Each ($0.55) instead of multiplying $0.55*20*1000 = $11,000 for a 1000 boxes
The formula I have chosen in the template against 'Plan quantity ' is in the attachment enclosed:
I need help with doing the right thing within the template to make it give a cost burden of $11000 for every 1000 boxes costed (costing lot size)

Didn't realize that you have to use transaction CPTD to charge template overhead to production orders. That's why it was not working. Now it is posting by reading the confirmed yield. But it is still not converting eaches to boxes using the conversion factor in the material master.
The formula I'm currently using in the template for actual quantity is as under:
OrderYieldConfirmed / AltQtyFactorFromMaterial( AlternativeQuantityUnit
= 'BX', Material = OrderMaterialNumber )
Please tell me what I need to do to the above formula to make it convert boxes to eaches using conversion factor in the material master?
A similar formula has worked beautifully for 'cost estimate'
OrderTotalQuantity / AltQtyFactorFromMaterial( AlternativeQuantityUnit =
'BX', Material = OrderMaterialNumber )

Understanding the Router product line

I'm in the process of doing a comparison between the newer 2800 (2811 to be exact) vs. a 3725. I am finding (or atleast it appears) that it is apples to oranges. I noticed that I can find things like "packets per second" for the 3725, but the 2800 series talks about lots of slots and abilities for things like VoIP. Can someone help me to understand the difference between what they are calling an Access Router (3725 etc) and a Multi-Service Router (2800 etc..)? I consult for a wireless ISP and which has currently a 45Mbps 802.11A backbone. Right now is is a switched backbone with 2611XM's doing InterVLAN routing. We are moving to a routed network and feel we need to upgrade the routers.
Thanks

Have you looked at the Cisco Product Quick Reference Guide (QRG)? The QRG is a good place to start for comparison of the various products and product lines. See http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/752/qrg/ for access.
Generally the 2811 would be good for a T-1 or two on the WAN side and the 3725 can accommodate higher speed WAN interfaces along with higher density port cards.
The 3725 will generally have more CPU horsepower but the AIM modules available on the 2800 series may offset that advantage depnding on what services you see your environment needing to use.
The 3700 series is also more expandable via a wider selection of interface cards.
Hope this helps - please rate the post if it does.

Performance issue: Adding a new product line to existing Quote calls pricing engine for existing line a well

Hi All,
I need some assistance for my below query...
If there are already existing some product/quote lines on the quote and then we try to add another new product/quote line to this quote , then it is taking more time to add the product. As per my understanding it is calling the Pricing engine for the existing line as well. How can we avoid the pricing engine call for the existing lines.
There are some parameters which we are setting as mentioned below :
l_control_rec.header_pricing_event := 'BATCH' -- What does this mean when we set to batch
l_control_rec.price_mode := 'ENTIRE_QUOTE'; -- (possible values could be CHANGE_LINES , QUOTE_LINE)
l_header_rec.pricing_status_indicator := 'C';
l_control_rec.calculate_freight_charge_flag := 'Y';
l_control_rec.calculate_tax_flag := 'Y';
l_header_rec.tax_status_indicator := 'C';
Question :Could someone please help us with this whether is there any way with these parameters could be altered or changed to some other value ( like for PRICE_MODE we see this parameter could have some other values like : CHANGE_LINES , QUOTE_LINE etc other than ENTIRE_QUOTE).
means lets say we do the Pricing Engine call only for the Newly Added quote line but not do it for the Entire Quote again and again..
Now the other question here could be how do we finally synch the line level price values for all the quote lines upto the Quote header level in form of Totals (TOTAL_LIST_PRICE,TOTAL_TAX, TOTAL_SHIPPING_CHARGE, SURCHARGE, TOTAL_QUOTE_PRICE in aso_quote_headers_all table) ??
Also is there a way that we don't do the Freight Charge calculation and Tax calculation (means we skip this completely) while adding products to the quote but do it at a later point when doing the Submit to Order functionality.
Could someone please help with these pricing related parameters and modes to be used in order to get around this performance issue
Thanks
Mithun

Dear Expert,
Activate your Controlling area as usual and Cost Centers and Profit Center , You can assign an internal order for the particular product line for what you are seeing and can collect the costs of that particular product line exclusively.
Regards,
Shankar K B

Put away to production lines directly, storage location control WM

We are Using Storagelocation Control Functionality in WM
We have below Storage locations
RW01 - Raw Material Storing
PD01 - Materials staged for Production Lines
I have setup 001 as Standard Storage location and 002 as 'not copied to TR'
Few materials are received directly to production lines instead of going to Raw material storage
PO--> GR is posted for PD01
Now TR got generated but doesnt have storage location in it, this is fine as per functionality
When i try to convert to TO it is copying MP01 since it it standard storage location
This is where we are getting 902 negative entries for MP01
No TR creation but bin to bin transer only solution ????

Any pointers ???

Work Order to cost center settlement with line item detail

Iu2019m having difficulty finding a method to settle from a work order to a cost center with line item detail. When an order is settled with KO88 or KO8G the total value for that work order/cost element combination is combined and posted to the cost center as a lump sum with the description of CTR\######. Users would like to see the individual values that posted to the work order in a cost center report such as KSB1.
I donu2019t see anything in the settlement rule, settlement profile or allocation structure that will allow line item settlement from work order to cost center. Is line item settlement possible when settling to a cost center? Is there an alternate way to see these expenses as line items in KSB1?
Thanks,
Jeff

Thanks Christian,
We've defined an allocation structure that we use for Project System and Work Order settlement and have Receiver Categories established as FXA, CTR and WBS with "by Cost Element" checked. Work order costs do settle to the cost center entered in the settlement rule, the problem is it combines all items values as a single amount when posting to the cost center.
For example:
expenses post to the work order under cost element 500000 for $500, $200, $300 and cost element 600000 for $250 and $250. The settlement rule says to settle to cost center 170000. When the settlement takes place cost center 170000 is debited $1000 to cost element 500000 and $500 to cost element 600000. We would prefer to see individual posting of $500, $200, $300 to 500000 and $250, $250 to 600000.
Thanks,
Jeff

Delivery item per schedule line

Hi all,
Thank you for viewing my posting, I have the requirement as following:
I have two SD schedule agreements, there are several schedule lines on JIT delivery Scheudle tab for each schedule agreement, these two schedule agreement are for same customer, have different material.
What I want is:
When I create delivery for these two schedule agreements in VL10A, these two schedule agreements are combined into one delivery note, but the delivery item per schedule line on the delivery note.
E.g.
one schedule agreement has 5 schedule lines
the other has 4 schedule lines
After I create delivery for these two delivery notes in VL10A, there should be 9 items on delivery notes, one item per schedule line.
Do you have idea on this? I do not want to combine several schedule line into one delivery item.
Thanks!
Alex Lu

Dear Alex,
You try these copy control settings between Scheduling agreement and delivery document.
Go to VTLA transaction select your document types
First you go header level settings here you can find the check box field called Copy item number check this then try.
If it is not full fill your requirement then go in to the item details here you can find the copying Routine maintenace field Item Data Under Data transfer Tab,this field will have 101 item Routine as per the standard,you take ABAPer help you copy this routine then change according to your requirement then assign new routine here.
I hope this will help you,
Regards,
Murali.

Error while giving the production line in repetitive mfg

Hello friends,
   When i am maintaining the production version in material master for repetitive mfg, and in production line when i am giving the workcenter which is in operation of rate routing, system giving me the error message that "REP01(which is my workcenter) is not maintained in plan (planning type = plant = smp1)".Message no. is CFVO90.
      Though i have got the solution of this message, but i am not able to understand the solution.
      Actually while creating the production version in material master, for task list data i was only maintaining the task list type, Group Number and Group counter for Rate Based only as Rate Routing.And when i would give the workcenter which is in operation of rate routing then system would give me the error.
       Later on when i maintained the Task list type, Group Number and Group counter for Detailed scheduling, Rate Routing, and Rough cut scheduling and than maintained the workcenter in production line,system didn't give the error.
      My question is as we are doing the repetitive mfg, and as we have maintained the rate routing, so why it so that in Detailed scheduling and rough cut scheduling also we have to maintain the Task list type, Group Number and Group counter.
     Plz guide.

Hello pravin,
Thanks for the reply.
Actually if i give the details of Task list type, Group, Group counter for Rate based scheduling only in production version and if i maintain the workcenter which i have given in the operation of Rate Rounting in production line then system is throwing the error mentioned above.
    Unless and until i mention the details of Rate Routing for all i.e. Detailed scheduling, Rough cut scheduling and Rate based scheduling, system is not allowing me to save the production version.
       As per your answer, even i am confused that as i have ticked the repetitive mfg in mrp 4 view and as i have given REM profile, so system should not give me the error when i only maintain the rate routing data in Rate based scheduling in production version.
      Is there any other way to solve this error.If not than whats the logic behind it.
           I hope u have understood my query.

How to configure Free of charge posting to cost account and not to balance?

Hi,
If we post GI for a free of charge delivery (sample) the following will be posted:
Cost of Sales 100
Finished goods 100
But we do not want to post to Cost of Sales but to a cost account.
What do I need to change?
Regards,
Eric.

Hi Eric van Zundert,
Follow below mentioned procedure;
1. OMJJ - Copy a new movement type as "901" from Movement type "601". For new movement type change the Valuation Modifier to "YAX" instead of "VAX" and SAVE.
2. OBYC - Here go to T/E key "GBB" and do the account determination for the new valuation modifier "YAX" of new movement type (Created in Step1).
3. VOV6 - Go to the Schedule Line Category (which is getting determined in Free of Charge Order) and assign the new Movement Type "901" instead of "601" and save.
Note: - If this Schedule Line Category is used for multiple Sales Orders then copy and create a new Schedule Line Category and do the changes for this one as suggeste din step3 and also do the schedule line category determination.
Now create a new order and do delivery and PGI and check A/c entry, also check during delivery it should pick up new Movement Type.
You need to take help of ur SD Consultant in this case.

To split the payment document value as per the line items of the P O

To split the payment document value as per the line items of the purchase order in the period of payment, so that the payment amounts are measured against the Capex order assigned as account assignment in the purchase order.(Account assignment tab for the individual line item in the PO.
Example:
Inputs:
Purchase Order 3100012345, line item 10 value 6000 line item 20 value 4000
VAT @10% , account assignment for PO line item 10(Internal Order no 10001) & line item 20 Internal Order 10002) G/ R no 5105105101 for Rs10,000.
The I/R doc 501501501 appears as follows: (MIRO)
Line 10: Value      Rs   6,000
        20: Value      Rs   4,000
VAT                        Rs      600
                       Rs      400
Total                       Rs11, 000
Withholding Tax Rs 1,100
The accounting entry for MIRO happens as follows: doc 2102102101
GR/IR Dr      Rs 10,000
VAT      Dr     Rs   1.000
Vendor    Cr           Rs9, 900
TDS due   Cr          Rs1, 100
The business expects the payment report as follows:payment doc 2001200101
PO     Line item      Internal Order MIRO        Invoice                       Payment       Payment period Amount
                                                                                A/c doc number        doc number
3400012345     10     10001           5605605601 2102102101           2001200101       001/2009           5940
3400012345     20     10002     5605605601     2102102101           2001200101        001/2009          3960
Currently we are able to show the amounts as Rs 6000 for line item 10 & Rs 4000 for line item 20.
The problems faced.
1.     The VAT line items are auto created, hence the reference of purchase order number and line item are not available. So the VAT portion which is part of payment liability does not get reflected against the PO.(not able to show the VAT portion , when we try to show the payment amount per PO line item.)
2.     The withholding tax is also a problem; WHT is not calculated and assigned per line item. It is calculated on the total amount of basic and VAT. Because of these reasons, the payment could not be shown properly according to the line item of the purchase order.
3.     When part payment is made, against invoices, there is no provision to assign a payment amount against a particular line item. Further, when final payment is made in different period, the clearing document will get generated. That adds to the complexity of differentiating full payments and part payments final clearing.
4.     When residual payment is made, a new line item is created. Here assignment of Purchase order line item against payment for residual items become a problem.
5.     Many a times advance payments are made. Later the invoice is created and balance payment is made. In those situations, the clearing document creates one more line item and makes payment for the balance item. This adds complexity in bringing balance payment alone and to split as per the purchase order line item. The clearing document number system is multi dimensional. It creates two line items for the same item (one at the time of advance and another the time of clearing.)
6.     When full payment is made, the payment document number and clearing document numbers are same. In cases of subsequent or partial or residual payment, the document numbers are different. Because of this, the part payment amounts are shown in the period, where the final payment and clearing are made.
Please suggest a way to split the payment amount in the exact posting period with all the considerations given above.
Regards
Sundararajan
Edited by: Sundarajan Venkatachari on Sep 30, 2009 11:04 AM

Hi,
See Note 301077 - User exits for the interface to accounting, although I think that there isn't this kind of option. Note 429117 - Collective note advice note SD-FI interface will be useful too.
I think that SAP Note 1085921 - Document split perhaps will help you
Regards
Eduardo

Post advertising costs as per product lines

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for