PR type generated by maintenance orders

Hi Gurus,
Where do you defined the type of purchase requisition generated by maintenance order ? Is it possible to have different types of PR depending on the material type of the component in the maintenance order ?
Cheers
Olivier

Hi,
You can define the PR type at following IMG point:
- Plant Maintenance and Customer Service
- Maintenance and Service Processing
   - Maintenance and Service Orders
     - General Data
       - Define Account Assignment Cat. and Document Type for Purchase Requisitions
The value is usually set to NB but this can be different. Only one value can be defined for PM orders.
To get varying document types consider exits COZF0001/COZF0002 and adjust the field BSART.
-Paul

Similar Messages

Multiple doc type setting for service PR generated from Maintenance order

Hi Gurus,
My client has multiple company code and has different document type for PR and PO as per the company code. For generating the service PR from maintenance order system take the document type of PR defined in the config.
Is it possible to define multiple document type for service PR depend on the company code/ Plant level?
Kindly help.
Regards
DP

Hi Ravi,
I used the User Exit COZF0001 . Since we can assign only one PR doc type in the config .
I have assigned one PR doc type in configuration which will work for a company code and all their respective plant. So in this case user exit wont do any job for changing the doc type.
You will defined a condition in the User exit saying that if company code /plant which you get it from maintenance order is not same (Config ) then provide the PR doc type which you want to create for respect plant or company code.
I dont have coding right now with me. You need a small coding to be done to create the separate PR doc type in EBAN-BSART
with respect to plant . Check in your configuration at what point of time you are creating the PR either in saving or release of MO. You can take the even to activate the User exit.
Consult your ABAPer they can do in 10 min.
DP

Problem in Goods receipt of serializedspare (Movement type: 262) on Maintenance Order

Dear Experts,
When i create a maintenance order for equipment and assign serialized spare parts With negative sign and valuation type damaged then i go to T-code MIGO to receive the spare parts (Movement type 262), the below error message has been showed up. This is because, I want to receive the spare part into the warehouse with valuation type (Damaged) differ from the valuation type of issuing it at the first time (Under test)
So is there a way to receive a spare part with the same serial number on a different valuation type than that one it has been issued upon it firstly.

grating jagdeep
this screen shoots for what you have asked for

Origin Object Type for Plant Maintenance Orders in Profit Center Accounting

Hi,
I want to make a selection for plant maintenance orders in transaction KE5Z, report for line items in Profit Center Accounting. When checking possible input options for the selection field <b></b>Origing Object Type<b></b> the system shows value 15 for Maintenance Orders. However I discovered in our system the maintenance orders are reported as Origing Object Type 03, which is Overhead Orders according to the selection list. So I cannot distinguish between overhead orders and maintenance orders in this report.
What is the cause our maintenance orders are assigned to Origin Object Type 03 in stead of 15 and what is the customizing transaction to correct this ?

Looks like, this is no longer supported. Refer to note 168004 and 102434.
Cause and prerequisites
These functions were not programmed to meet the above requirements.
As of Release 4.0, the object type is transferred directly.
Solution
Once you have implemented the advance correction. the origin object type 'Overhead cost order' (03) is assigned irrespective of what is the SCOPE for orders.
As a result of implementing this note or as of Release 4.6B, the order category distinguishes between overhead cost orders and production orders in the origin object type. In this case, the following origin object types result (as described above in 1.):
Order category 04 to 10, 40 => 04 (production order)
All other order categories => 03 (overhead cost order)
The logic that the origin object type was set depending on the object class (as described above in 2.) is no longer supported. The object class can be evaluated separately in Reporting. -
The corrections of this note refer in Release 4.0B to the corrections from Note 102434.

PR not in table generate with maintenance order

Hi gurus,
I have a problem about maintenance order service external generate to PR(Purchase Requisition)
on External Tab. service Number already insert but material Group, Recipient, Purch. Group is blank and saved. so PR Number auto generate. but, i was check PR is not in table, like below.
Generate PR is done but cannot be updated, because in table EBAN is empty.
where is PR number ?
thank u,
SaifudinHajar

Hi Sundar,
the order already released,
i means why PR is generated but in table EBAN, is empty?
thanks,
Hajar

Maintenance activity type and order type for plant maintenance order

How can i get the maintenance activity type and order type for a given plant maintenance order. Please let me know the table where i can get these two fields
In AFIH i can only get the MAT for an order number

Maintenance activity type -
AFIH - ILART
Order Category Indicator Plant Maintenance -
AFIH - AKKNZ
reward if heplful

Service PR generated through maintenance order

Hi Friends,
I am creating a maintenance order in which i am using external services(Control key PM03).
The PR is getting generated, but delivery date in the PR is not editable or modifiable its greyed out.
How to make the field editable.
please advise
Thanks in advance
Vivek
Edited by: vivek mankad on Jan 27, 2009 5:05 AM

Hi Friends,
We have solved the problem using the user Exit. If you want to change the delivery date in the PR generated through maintenance only option is through user exit. Even if you use user exit the field will not be modifiable. What we did was we created a new field where we maintain the delivery date and used the user exit COZF0001 to pick the date from the field. Now whatever date is entered in that field will be displayed in the PR.
Thanks a lot guys.
Vivek

Define Purch. Req. transaction type for Plant Maintenance Order

Hello,
Does anybody know how i can specify the (default) Purch. Req. transaction type for a Plant Maintenance Order (IW31)? By default it picks up 'NB' but i would want to change this.
Kind regards,
Tim

Hi,
Go to this menupath spro>IMG->Plant Maintenance and Customer Service>Maintenance and Service Processing>Maintenance and Service Orders>General Data>Define Account Assignment Cat. and Document Type for Purchase Requisitions.Here you can change the doc.type for the PR.
Regards,
Venkatesh

Activity type field in Maintenance Order

Hi all
My client requirement is that activity type (LARNT)should me mandatory in maintenance orders to capcture the cost with out fail.
Could any body suggest me that when we need to do that?
Regards
Srinivas

Hi
Since the work center is mandatory you can make the activity type mandatory for workcenter master data record in OPFA IMG
or check in OIOPL where you can make the activity type as mandatory ,but i think it will only work once you nagivate the operation tab
or check whether user exit order at save will be useful
regards
thyagarajan

Deletion of Reservation item generated from Maintenance Order

We have a peculiar problem.
In Production system, weu2019ve close Maintenance Order that has a component reservation. When closing the Maintenance Order, the reservation has been set deletion flag but two components are not being marked for deletion.
We only have two reservations on Production system with this situation, on any other cases the reservation takes the deletion flag when closing the Maintenance Order.
What could be the problem?

Hi,
Check whether you have done good issue for that component .
whenever you do Teco open resurvation will cancelled.
Regards,
vinit

Diff PR Document types for Diff PM Order Types !!

Hi all,
We can define the PR Document type at the Order Category Level.
e.g. for Order Category 30, I can define PR document type as UB.
Now my requirement is that, I want to define PR Document type at order Type level.
which means, I have PR document type NB for Order Type PM01
and PR document type UB for Order Type PM02.
Is there any possibilty of acheiving this.
Thanks and regards,
Piyush Gupta

Hi,
It is frequently asked, see this [thread|PR type generated by maintenance orders;.
-Paul

Add the budget profile in the order type Maintenance Order

Dear Experts,
Scenario for Repair & Maintenance with only MM & FICO module live w.e.f. 2007 (PM not live)
Process Managed thru Internal Order (Order Type: RPMT)
Budget managed through Investment Management (IM); Budget is directly entered against the IO using transaction IM52
Scenario for Repair & Maintenance with only MM, FICO & PM module live (PM went live in 2010)
It was proposed to assign budget against each Maintenance Order. Since the number of maintenance orders being used is very high, it was decided to link the MO & IO so that budget will be assigned to the IO and when the MO is settled against the IO, the budget in IO can be deducted accordingly. The proposed process to assign budget in Internal Order against each Maintenance Order are given below-:
1.) In EAM process one can plan/procure material and External Services only when the Maintenance Order is created & released but practically it has to be planned long before any Maintenance Activity (Maintenance Order to be linked with the estimate so that PO can be created against the estimate).
2.) The no. of Maintenance Order generated in EAM Module is very large as Maintenance order is created for almost each and every maintenance activity. It is cumbersome to allocate the budget to each and every maintenance order. There should be a single estimate for maintenance activity (as in MM module) and that should be linked to maintenance order so that the actual cost of Indent/Service Entry Sheet can be deducted automatically from the estimate (Maintenance Order is to be linked with estimate).
3.) While doing return Indent the cost of return material is not being added to the maintenance order automatically (Maintenance Order is to be linked with estimate).
4.) If Material & External Services not planned in the maintenance order (estimate), the user must be able to do that through Internal Order (estimate), hence the Internal Order must be link to the Maintenance Order. They should able to record the planned & actual cost in the maintenance Order.
Process followed:
1.) Created Internal Order in KO01 for Repair & Maintenance Order Type
Assigned budget to Internal Order thru IM52
2.) Created PM order and assigned Internal order against Settlement Order in tab
u2018Locationu2019 and in Settlement Rule with 100%. In this Section attach the Internal
Order with selection type u2018ORDu2019.
3.) Released both orders and issue the Material for particular Operation and then
determine the Cost for material .After that performed MIGO for consumption of
materials.
4.) Settled the PM order in KO88.
Settlement process was successfully saved.
Problem faced:
After posting the goods movement (against each Maintenance Order) and settlement of the maintenance order against IO, we still find the budget assigned to the IO is not consumed/deducted.
1. Actual cost of maintenance is not reflected in the internal order
immediately. We have to run cost settlement (t-code KO88) for the
maintenance order each time the actual cost is incurred in the maintenance order.
2. Also in the case of return indent, the value of returned material is not directly
added to the available budget of internal order.
3. When the material is issued from store through the reservation generated by
maintenance order, system does not check for budget in the internal
order/maintenance order while issuing material from the store.
4. It must not be allowed to create reservation from the internal order of order type
RPMT.
5. In case of external service in the maintenance order, the unit of
measure in the requisition is set to u201CD (days)u201D by default. System does not allow
changing the unit of measure in the requisition (it should allow to change the unit
of measure or set the unit of measure u201CJOBu201D).
6.) When the material is issued from the store through reservation generated in
maintenance order, system does not check for budget in Internal Order
(estimate)/Maintenance Order while issuing material from store.
7.) My first problem is every time running the cost settlement(KO88) is maindetory.Without running cost settlement, How we can settle the actual amount of MO with IO (Estimate budget).
2.) As you know that I have assigned the budget in IO.How system will check the budget while issuing the goods for maintenance order.So will please tell me that which user-exit is used over here.
Thanks & Regards,

Hi Deepak1103,
Well, obviously you will have to settle the costs incurred at the maintenance order. The internal order should be mentioned in the settlement order field in the location tab of the maintenance order. What you can do is to ask your ABAP person to activate this enhancement IWO10004: Maintenance order: Customer check for order completion, use the CAUFVD structure to get the internal order number, then use the BAPI BAPI_INTERNALORDER_GETDETAIL and pass the details to the function module BBPG_BUDGET_CHECK and check the actual cost against the required budget. In case of a conflict raise an error other wise run the function module CK_F_IH_ORDER_SETTLE to settle the costs of the maintenance order to the internal order. Budget would also be consumed and you can verify the same in S_ALR_87013019.
Regards,
Muhammad Usman Kahoot

Budget Process (Linked the maintenance Order into Internal Order) in EAM

Dear Experts,
Scenario for Repair & Maintenance with only MM & FICO module live w.e.f. 2007 (PM not live)
Process Managed thru Internal Order (Order Type: RPMT)
Budget managed through Investment Management (IM); Budget is directly entered against the IO using transaction IM52
Scenario for Repair & Maintenance with only MM, FICO & PM module live (PM went live in 2010)
It was proposed to assign budget against each Maintenance Order. Since the number of maintenance orders being used is very high, it was decided to link the MO & IO so that budget will be assigned to the IO and when the MO is settled against the IO, the budget in IO can be deducted accordingly. The proposed process to assign budget in Internal Order against each Maintenance Order are given below-:
1.)     In EAM process one can plan/procure material and External Services only when the Maintenance Order is created & released but practically it has to be planned long before any Maintenance Activity (Maintenance Order to be linked with the estimate so that PO can be created against the estimate).
2.)     The no. of Maintenance Order generated in EAM Module is very large as Maintenance order is created for almost each and every maintenance activity. It is cumbersome to allocate the budget to each and every maintenance order. There should be a single estimate for maintenance activity (as in MM module) and that should be linked to maintenance order so that the actual cost of Indent/Service Entry Sheet can be deducted automatically from the estimate (Maintenance Order is to be linked with estimate).
3.)      While doing return Indent the cost of return material is not being added to the maintenance order automatically (Maintenance Order is to be linked with estimate).
4.)      If Material & External Services not planned in the maintenance order (estimate), the user must be able to do that through Internal Order (estimate), hence the Internal Order must be link to the Maintenance Order. They should able to record the planned & actual cost in the maintenance Order.
Process followed:
1.) Created Internal Order in KO01 for Repair & Maintenance Order Type
     Assigned budget to Internal Order thru IM52
2.) Created PM order and assigned Internal order against Settlement Order in tab
     u2018Locationu2019 and in Settlement Rule with 100%. In this Section attach the Internal
     Order with selection type u2018ORDu2019.
3.) Released both orders and issue the Material for particular Operation and then
     determine the Cost for material .After that performed MIGO for consumption of
     materials.
4.) Settled the PM order in KO88.
     Settlement process was successfully saved.
Problem faced:
After posting the goods movement (against each Maintenance Order) and settlement of the maintenance order against IO, we still find the budget assigned to the IO is not consumed/deducted.
1. Actual cost of maintenance is not reflected in the internal order
    immediately. We have to run cost settlement (t-code KO88) for the
    maintenance order each time the actual cost is incurred in the maintenance order.
2. Also in the case of return indent, the value of returned material is not directly
    added to the available budget of internal order.
3. When the material is issued from store through the reservation generated by
    maintenance order, system does not check for budget in the internal
    order/maintenance order while issuing material from the store.
4. It must not be allowed to create reservation from the internal order of order type
     RPMT.
5. In case of external service in the maintenance order, the unit of
     measure in the requisition is set to u201CD (days)u201D by default. System does not allow
     changing the unit of measure in the requisition (it should allow to change the unit
     of measure or set the unit of measure u201CJOBu201D).
6.) When the material is issued from the store through reservation generated in
     maintenance order, system does not check for budget in Internal Order
     (estimate)/Maintenance Order while issuing material from store.
Thanks & Regards
Deepak Soni

Hi,
1. Actual cost of maintenance is not reflected in the internal order
immediately. We have to run cost settlement (t-code KO88) for the
maintenance order each time the actual cost is incurred in the maintenance order.
As per the standard system budgeting is done against the actual cost only. And until you settle your order the actual cost from
maint order are not getting transfered to IO. Once they are transfered system is checking for the budget.
2. Also in the case of return indent, the value of returned material is not directly added to the available budget of internal order.
This is similar to first point, when you return goods there will be negative cost on the order, this has to be settled until that system will not compare the IO budget with maintenance order actual cost.
3. When the material is issued from store through the reservation generated by maintenance order, system does not check for budget in the internal order/maintenance order while issuing material from the store.
The budget you have assigned is at IO, how can system will check the budget while issueing goods for maintenance order. We may have to develop or use some user exit over here. Which will trigger checking of budget from the settlement receiver IO for that maintenance order.
I think you may have to go for development. These are my observations from my experience.
Regards,
NNR

How to Create New Maintenance Order using IP30 against the deleted one

Dear Sir,
We have an equipment having Monthly Maintenance Schedule . Using IP30 , we had generated Maintenance Order for next 3 months (i.e Jan / Feb / March ) . Due to some change in the Task List , We decided to Delete these earlier generated Maintenance Orders and then generate the fresh Orders usiing IP30 . To set Delete Indicator , we used Tcode IP02 and these Orders were marked with Delete Indicator .
Subsequently using IP30 , we tried to generate fresh Maintenance Orders ( for month Jan / Feb / March ) for this Maintenace Plan. But no fresh Orders are getting generated . On Analysing it further , we find that for this Maintenance Plan ( Tcode IP02) under the tab <Maintenance plan Schedule Call > , against the Jan / feb / March months Sceduling Type/Status is appearing as "Schedule Completed" .
Kindly guide us as how can we generate the fresh Orders .
With Thanks and Rgds
Sonia

Hi
I would suggest two option for this query:
Option1: You can use the existing (deletion flaged) orders, by deleting all the operation in the created PM order and in order, goto Extras - select the Task list which you have done changes. In this option your exsisting plan is not distrubed.
Option2: If any way you want new PM orders, then Goto schedule of the plan & restart, system will ask wheather to delet/ skip the existing schedule.
Hope this options will help you to take decision.
Regards
S Ramanujam
Edited by: Ramanujam Srinivasan on Dec 29, 2009 8:13 AM
Edited by: Ramanujam Srinivasan on Dec 29, 2009 8:15 AM

Changing basic finish date in Preventive maintenance orders

Hi Experts,
My requirement is to block PP work centre when maintenance schedule the equipment for preventive maintenance. I am making system condition as zero in generated preventive maintenance order but basic finish date is not changing in the order automatically. Can anybody please explain how to bring this? Finally my requirement is system should change basic finish date and time as time given in operation of task list.
Thanks in advance.
best regards,
Srinivas M

Hi Praveen,
I have done all setting and tested but there is no change.
My client requirement is like this - whenever maintenance plans are scheduled, for the scheduled dates, production capacity should not be considered by production. We could do this for breakdown orders but not happening for PM orders unless we change the finish date.
The issue is to get the finish date automatically when scheduling maint.plans with respect to values given in operations. Please suggest how to get the basic finish dates automatically.
best regards,
-Srinivas

PR type generated by maintenance orders

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for