PS Commitments

Hi all,
I wonder if anyone can help with a PS commitment problem i have got: Initially I struggled for ages to get a problem fixed with SAP where a purchase requisition was initially created with a PS account assignment and pulled up into BI then it was changed to a cost center and the reversal was not pulled through. OSS eventually fixed this, but now I seem to be having more problems which I am trying to find a pattern with.
I have found that the purchase requisitions that are not been pulled through into BI seem to have WBS elements with the status insufficient budget on them and the status was inititiated when the Purchase Requisition was created. I have spoken to the R3 team here and they are not confinviniced - Has anyone had this before... Is this possibly the reason why my pr's are not been pulled up? I am trying to create the scenario in DEV, but do not have auth and now have to wait for auth to be assigned to me etc so was trying to find out if anyone has had this problem before.
Thanks
Lynn

Hi Lynn and Oscar,
I am trying to extract PS data into BW. I got all standard extractors. But I am missing extractors in PS for Commitment   0CO_OM_WBS_7 and Actual costs-internal   0CO_OM_WBS_8. But those are available in WBS.
My Question is, from where shall I extract data, is it possible to connect these data sources to any of the standard PS infocubes?
What did you use in your project?
Also, SAP has some standard BI reports which comes up with ready made RKF's for Costs-Commitments. Is it okay to use this RKF instead above DS? 
Please let me know.
Thanks,
BMW

Similar Messages

  • Open commitments though Delivery complition ticked for PO.

    Dear Experts,
    I am facing a very strange issue.
    We have a PO with 10 line items all items are alike except line item 9/10 where unit of measure is EA (each) and for others it is D (days). (account assignment catagory as Project, in the account assignment  WBS element, Commitment item, Funds center, Fund are maintained, and it is same for all line items),
    All the items are ticked for del.complition. So apperantly these items should not appear as open commitments in Funds consumption report,
    First Eights lines (which have unit of measure as D) are not appearing in Fund consumption report but the last two line items 9/10 (with unit as EA) are appearing as open commitment in Funds consumption report.
    I just changed the unit of measure of line item 8/9 to D from  EA and saved the PO. After this i run the Funds consumption report and to my surprise the line items 8/9 are not appearing as open commitments.
    I am not getting how come Unit of measure is playing role in Funds consumption. 
    Can somebody help me understand.
    Best Regards
    abhijit

    Hi,
    This reply is more of a guess work than otherwise:
    Commitment seems to be created with unit of measure as D, possibly because that is the base unit of measure. EA could be alternate unit of measure which is entered in the PO. When you set delivery completion indicator, commitment is removed to the extend of  EA rates (reason note known - possibly due to corrections in PO subsequently from D to EA. You can check the PO change history in this regard)
    To further understand the issue, you can verify the value of commitment with D & EA from table COOI by passing the object number with and without delivery completion indicator. Alternatively, you can use transaction RKACSHOW to see the changes in commitment with differing units of measure and with / without delivery completion indicator.
    Please post the results after trying out.
    Muraleedharan.R

  • Report S_ALR_87012085 , field Special G/L commitments

    Hi,
    A background of my requirement:
    I want to have a vendor aging report. I have explored & identified that there are two standard reports available for the same:
    1. S_ALR_87012085
    2. S_ALR_87012078
    I have run through Forumn & haven't got any answer for my query hence posting a new query. I need to understand some area in relation to these two reports.
    Our requirement from a vendor aging report is to have multiple level summation from the point of view of Co. Code; then under Co code -> Account(vendor or Customer); then under Account detail list with seperate summation based on Spl. GL indicators for each Business Area.
    Need guidance on:
    1. S_ALR_87012085 : This report more or less satisfies my requirement except no seperate summation is happenning on the basis of Spl. GL indicators. However, in this report there is a input field is available 'Special G/L commitments'. I am putting values 'AW' here but no different output is coming whether we use this field or not. Please guide the purpose of this field & how to use the same. The document part says:
    "List of Special G/L Inds for which Balances are Displayed
        List of the special G/L indicators for which separate balances are to be
        displayed in the specifications for the master record area. If special
        G/L transactions were posted which are not included in this list, the
        balances are summed up under "Other commitments". Noted items are not
        taken into consideration."
    2. S_ALR_87012078: There is a report already existing '0SAPDUEAN-01' under the report type 'Line item analysis'. This report also doesn't satisfies my purpose completely. So I need a guidance whether I should modify a current report or create  a new report. Also whether this transaction supports two report & provide us an option to choose either while executing the report?
    Also in many threads it is written that,
    ' Go to transaction code FDI4
    Select Form Type RFFRRD20 Line item analysis'
    But I am not able to see this form type in my system. I am running on SAP 4.7.
    Awaiting response......
    Thanks,
    Akhil

    Dear AB2312
    I undersood what you are saying, to put Spl GL recon account in the 'Line Item Recon A/c' field. But my purpose is still not resolved. I need to run S_ALR_87012085 once with all the input parameters & output should have multiple level summation as pointed by me in my first Post. Thats why I was wonderring what purpose 'Special G/L commitments' field serve.
    Any suggestion on S_ALR_87012078 this as well?
    Regards,
    Akhil

  • Actual and Commitments values are not Appearing in Internal order report

    Hi
    We have done budget in KO22 for Internal Order and active the availability controle after that we made PO with the same IO and with account assignment category 'A' and GR also happened.
    So when we run the report (S_ALR_87013019 - List: Budget/Actual/Commitments ), system is not showing Actual and Commitments values...
    Please help me in this regard...
    Thanks,
    Saisri

    Hi,
    Here we are giving internal order in PO with account assignment category 'A'
    In case of Account assignment category 'K'  it is showing the Actual values in Report.
    Why is it showing Actal /commitment values incase of 'K'  ?
    Why it is not showing when we select the 'A' category ?
    Please provide me answer about my queries...plz
    Thanks,
    Saisri

  • Open PO Commitments carryforward

    Hi Experts
    We are implementing FM-BCS. As per our Business requirement at the year end, we need to carryforward open PO commitments to next year.
    I have tried the same by using T.Code FMJ2 and Open PO commitments are successfully carry forwarded to next fiscal year. 
    When I checked the same in Budget availability Report the opem commitment amount got reduced from consumable and consumed amount in sender year (2011) and the same open commitment amount got increased in consumable and consumed amount in receiver fiscal year (2012). And also the amount got reduced in sender fiscal year with period 16 (we are using fiscal variant V3). But it should be updated with period 12 (fiscal year 2011)instead of 16th period.
    Please suggest Why it is updated with 16th period?  And also why open commitment amount got reduced in sender fiscal year (2011)?
    Please suggest the process.
    Thanks in advance.
    Rao

    Hello,
    The commitment carried forward debits the budget in the new year. This is documented in the online help and also in the technical documentation of FMJ2.
    Regarding to the posting period in the sender year, the system uses the fiscal year variant associated to your FM Area. To calculate the period, the system adds the number special periods to the last 'normal' period defined in the fiscal year variant.
    Technically, the system reads table T009 and adds values of fields ANZBP and ANZSP together.
    hope this answers your questions
    cheers,
    Mar

  • Standard stock report for Stock Commitments

    Hi gurus,
    Is there any standard report available to see the  Stock  like Reserved qty,stock transfer,scheduled for delivery against each batch in a same transaction like MMBE.
    In MMBE by selecting the Read Stock Commitments indicator we can get.
    the constrain is here we can able to see against only one material.
    if i goto MB52 i am not getting the above said stock type.
    Expecting Your Valuable Suggestions!
    Regards,
    D.K.Vijaya Bhaskar

    MMBE can be used as a report for individual material & MB5B is very useful Transaction Code as stock report for multiple material. It requires to be explored more & more, so that most of the stock report as per requirement is avialble.
    Regards,
    Rajesh Banka
    Reward points if helpful.

  • S_ALR_87013019 -List: Budget/Actual/Commitments Report Error

    Dear All
    I would like to bring your kind information that while executing the
    SAP standard T.code: S_ALR_87013019 - List:Budget/Actual/Commitments,we are not able to get the report based on the year wise.
    As in the SAP release 4.7, when we run the said transaction, we can able to see the report budget/actual/commitment as per year wise. Where in ECC 6.0, we could not able to see the report as per year wise and instead it shows the order report budget/actual/commitment output totally as "not dependent on year".
    It does not bring the budget/actual/commitment values per year wise(1-S-GJAHR-BUD-ALL Overall budget) and giving output as total values for Individual Order and or Order Group.
    I request you to all kindly provide your suggestion which would be very much appreciated.
    Regards,
    Ran.

    To solve the problem, please follow:                                                                               
    1.  Call transaction GRCT and select the row RWCOOM.                                                                               
    2.  Choose Special Characteristics in the left tree.                                                                               
    3.  Double-click the row containing GJAHR.                                                                               
    4.  In the field Filler routine, enter the routine E03_FILL_GJAHR.                                                                               
    5.  In the field Conversion routine, enter the routine E03_CHANGE_GJAHR
        and save the change.                                                                               
    6.  Regenerate all report groups for the table RWCOOM via transaction  
        GR5G.                                                              
    regards from Berlin
    Mathias

  • Budget/Actual/Commitments Report in PM Order

    Dear Experts,
                  I am using the scenario of PM and PS integration. In which i am creating a project with WBS elements. & each WBS is having some budget and is also released. I am using one of the WBS in PM order in additional data tab page. After that i am releasing the order and doing the time confirmation. In the cost tab of PM order the actual cost is coming . Now i am trying to see the report  Budget/Actual/Commitments  by clicking on Rep.Budget/Commit. button.
                    Here in a report no budget is appearing only actual cost is coming.
    Kindly let me know why budget is not appearing in the report , even though the budget has been assigned to WBS which has been used in PM Order and released.
    Regards
    Amar

    Hi,
    Note that WBS element used here is for rolling up cost to WBS element from work order.When you define WBS element that will act as settlement receiver for work order.There is no other connection between WBS and work order to budget/actual report on cost tab of work order.Hence, you can see only costs related to order on order cost reports and no budget from WBS.
    If you want to see budget/actual cost report on order then you need to activate budgeting functionality for work order object.This is done by assigning budget profile to order type which will act many times as internal order in FI area.Then you need to use budget functionality on order level by supplement/availability control functionality.Then only you can see budget/actual/committment cost report as it is relevant to order as an object.
    So dont get confused with this budget cost report with WBS budget.
    Reports on WBS/project objects are seen in respective PS cost reports.
    regds,
    atul

  • Commitments

    Hi Experts,
    In the report S_ALR_87013542, we are seeing some commitment in the commitments column. But when we see the Purchase orders for this project, we are not able to see any open PO's. But still in this report we are seeing some open commitments. Please let me know, what else can cause to show as commitment in this report.
    Thanks,
    Venkata Prasanna.R

    Hi,
    Try running  the correction program RKACOR04. In this program select 'Commitments', 'Update' and deactivate 'Actual'. Get the order number from  PRPS (for the WBS element).
    After running the program, run CJEN.
    If this dosent work, then check the SAP note 152571 - Composite SAP note: Missing or incorrect commitments, it could give you some idea.
    Regards,
    Praveen

  • Open commitments of Project PO needs to be cleared

    Hi All,
    User wants to have the Purchase Order commitments cleared.
    The issue is related to open commitments for project Purchase Order. The user needs to have the commitments cleared so she can put a final close to the charge code.
    We tried option to tick the Final Inv indicator in Purchase Order Delivery Tab, for which SAP system is giving an error u201CValuation area needs to be assigned to plantu201D. We also identified that Table related to Plant Valuation Area is not showing any value related to Plant.
    Can any one suggest and solution. This Company code is in inactive mode?
    Regards,
    Pradeep

    Hi Ahmed,
    When I am trying to save after check Deliv. Compl. check box, system is giving me an error,
    Valuation area  not defined
    Message no. ME059
    Diagnosis
    The valuation area defined for the plant is not defined in table T001K.
    Procedure
    Check the assignment plant -> valuation area in table T001W.
    How can we rectify this problem? Waiting for reply
    Regards,
    Pradeep

  • Cost center commitments reconcilation issue

    Hi,
    i have Cost Center Commitments Reconcilation issue.. one cost element values are not updating to BW from R/3 this is the issue we have .. RSA3 showing 0 Amount for that cost element.. i have tried to load upto PSA here also i am getting 0 values.. i have checked in table "COOI" i found the values for that cost element.. and also i have checked in ksb1 it is also showing the values... cost center commitments data source 0CO_OM_CCA_10 has no customer exist... could any one have any idea on this... what may cause the issue.....
    Thanks & Regards
    Sreekanth

    Hi,
    As per below the extractor is working fine. KSB1 displays the Actual Linte items and KSB2 displays the Commitments Line items. So the commitments extractor is working fine if the data matches with KSB2.
    DataSource 0CO_OM_CCA_9 will give you the actual costs and matches with KSB1
    Thanks,
    Nagarjuna.
    Edited by: Nagarjuna Reddy on Oct 20, 2011 9:07 AM

  • Funds Consumption Open commitments

    Dear Experts,
    I am facing a very strange issue.
    We have a PO with 10 line items all items are alike except line item 9/10 where unit of measure is EA (each) and for others it is D (days). (account assignment catagory as Project, in the account assignment  WBS element, Commitment item, Funds center, Fund are maintained, and it is same for all line items),
    All the items are ticked for del.complition. So apperantly these items should not appear as open commitments in Funds consumption report,
    First Eights lines (which have unit of measure as D) are not appearing in Fund consumption report but the last two line items 9/10 (with unit as EA) are appearing as open commitment in Funds consumption report.
    I just changed the unit of measure of line item 8/9 to D from  EA and saved the PO. After this i run the Funds consumption report and to my surprise the line items 8/9 are not appearing as open commitments.
    I am not getting how come Unit of measure is playing role in Funds consumption. 
    Can somebody help me understand.
    Best Regards
    abhijit

    Hi,
    This reply is more of a guess work than otherwise:
    Commitment seems to be created with unit of measure as D, possibly because that is the base unit of measure. EA could be alternate unit of measure which is entered in the PO. When you set delivery completion indicator, commitment is removed to the extend of  EA rates (reason note known - possibly due to corrections in PO subsequently from D to EA. You can check the PO change history in this regard)
    To further understand the issue, you can verify the value of commitment with D & EA from table COOI by passing the object number with and without delivery completion indicator. Alternatively, you can use transaction RKACSHOW to see the changes in commitment with differing units of measure and with / without delivery completion indicator.
    Please post the results after trying out.
    Muraleedharan.R

  • Open commitments on WBS

    Hi,
    Report SLR_87013535 (plan/ actual/commitments) shows commitments on a WBS .
    I there are commitments balance showing in the report, even though final invoices have been posted for the PO's. The PO's  are contract service PO's hence no GR's are getting created only invoice.
    How can we close the commitments ?
    Pls help

    Hi,
    for services please follow two steps:
    1. Service entry:
    The services actually performed (work actually done) by a service provider are recorded in a Service Entry Sheet with reference to the purchase order
    2. Service acceptance:
    Hope its useful..
    thanks

  • Commitments at activity level in report S_ALR_87013533 - Plan/Actual/Commit

    Hi All,
    When i executed the report S_ALR_87013533 - Plan/Actual/Commitment/Rem.Plan/Assigned, the commitments are shown at WBS level but not at activity level. Is there any setting required to see the commitments at the activity level?
    Where as the planned costs are shown against the activity in the same report.
    Please suggest the required settings if any?
    Regards,
    Ramana.

    HI Rifaee/Martina,
    In CJI5 the line items are shown under the WBS. But i would like to see the line items in the report.
    Even after running the report cjen the database is not updated for line itemwise commitment in the report.
    How to assign the PR/PO as account assignments to activity? Where do i need to do this setting? Please inform.
    Regards,
    Ramana

  • Report to view commitments on a vendor

    hi Guru
    Please tell me if on the MM side if there exists a report to view commitments on a vendor
    Best Regards

    hi,
    Expediting Report [by Vendor] [PSv8.9]       
    Expediting Report [by Vendor] (POY4007)
    Introduction
    Purpose of the Report
    The report displays a detail listing of outstanding Purchase Orders (PO) sorted by vendor. PO details include due date, late days, vendor ID/name and ship to ID. The run control page allows the user to specify a date range, vendor Set ID, vendor ID, buyer and agency PO Business Unit.
    Three reports can be produced from the same run control page: Expediting Report by Buyer (POY4006), Expediting Report by Vendor (POY4007), and Expediting Report by Due Date (POY4008).
    This report is used to determine which POs may require expediting.
    Type of Report
    Crystal
    Legacy SAAAS/CAS Reports
    Option 15 Purchasing Reports, Option 16 Accounts Payable Reports
    CAS ACRE 58 Active Commitments u2013 Detail, ACRE 59 Commitment Analysis - Summary
    Role(s) Needed for Access the Reports
    Purchasing Module Report Maker
    Navigation Path to the Report
    Purchasing > Purchase Orders > Reports > Expediting
    Suggested Run Times
    Ad hoc
    Report Request Parameters
    General Notes:
    Select an existing Run Control ID or enter a new one
    For reports that are run on a regular basis, user should select a Run Control ID naming convention that can be easily identified (e.g. PO_Expediting_Vendor)
    An asterisk * preceding the field name indicates input is required
    Go to tips and tricks for additional help in entering Run Control IDs and report parameters
    Report Request Parameters                                                          see screenshots below
    In This Field      Enter      Notes
    From Date:      type date or use the lookup to select      
              o to display one day  - enter same date in both fields
              o to display a date range u2013 enter beginning and end date
              o to display year to date u2013 enter 07/01/YYYY and current date
    Through Date:      type date or use the lookup to select
    Vendor Set ID      Type STATE or use the lookup to select      Use STATE for most purchasing reports
    Vendor ID:      type vendor ID or use the lookup to select      leave blank to display all vendor IDs for selected report parameters
    specify vendor ID to display data for one vendor ID
    Buyer      type buyer or use the lookup to select      leave blank to display all buyers for selected report parameters
    specify buyer to display data for one buyer
    Business Unit      type agency PO Business Unit or use the lookup to select      user must enter agency PO Business Unit. For example, enter DOCM1 for Department of Correction
        Save      push the save button to  save report parameters      save reports that you want to run on a regular basis
    Run
    push the run control button      on the Process Scheduler Request page:
    select server (PSNT or PSUNIX) from the dropdown menu or leave blank
    select one, two, or all three reports (by buyer, by vendor, by due date)
    format u2013 change format to PDF; XLS (MS Excel format) is also available
    push the OK button
    Report Request Parameters (continued)                                    see screenshots below
    In This Field      Enter      Notes
        Process Monitor      
    click the Process Monitor link on the Report Request Parameters page      on the Process List tab
    view the processing status of the report
    click the refresh button until the Run Status is u201CSuccessu201D and the Distribution Status is u201CPostedu201D
    click the details link
    on the Process Detail page:
    click the view log/trace link
    on the View Log/Trace page:
    click the report name.PDF link to view the report
    Example of Report Output
    Example of rows generated for an Expediting Report by Vendor (POY4007) (Crystal format) with the suggested parameters.
    Rewards welcome
    Thanks & Regards
    SwathiSri

  • In-correct commitments for WBS elements

    Hi
    The Service order has got account assignement as either projects or aux accts assignment. Theis split into two accounts assignments with two WBS elements with a percentage distribution. (say 60and 40%) with the same G/L account. Now GR, IR and service entry sheet has been done for the both. I can see all the actual costs in CJI3 report. Now, the commitments have been reduced only for the first WBS element/accts assgnt. The value remains appearing in the report as open commitment for the second one although I have exhausted all the amount from PO. Can anybody explore the reasons for this behaviour.
    Thanks in advance.
    Basavaraj T.

    Hi
    Thanks for your feedback. I did run program RKANBU01. But it did not correct the commitment.
    Giving you some more details:
    The Total service order value: 107030.00
    1st  acct assignment: 0.6 (60%)
    2nd acct assignment: 0.4 (40%)
    Both assigned to to two different WBS elements in service order.
    GR/IR/Service entry done: 57796.00 and 38530.00 This comes total of: 96326.00
    Balance as per above statistics: 10704.00
    But in CJI5 report, it is showing up: 42812.00
    This is exactly 40% of the order value. It seems while reducing the commitments, it has taken into consideration of first account assignment only. The second one remain as it is.
    Any hint is most welcome.
    Regards,
    Basav

Maybe you are looking for