Reclassification of Data..

If I need to reclassify certain account balanced in BPC consolidation. What is the best approach.
The sending account and receiving account can be entered only during runtime.

Hi,
For Reclassification
1. Create Business rule "Account transformation."
2. Create Script logic.
*RUN_STORED_PROCEDURE = SPRUNCALCACCOUNT( '%APP%', '%CATEGORY_SET%','%CONSOLVIEW_SET%', '%SCOPETABLE%','%LOGTABLE%','CF')
Change parameters above according to your dimensions.
3. Create Datamanger package.
4. Run Data manager package.

Similar Messages

Data Query combining GL, AP & AR

Hi Guys,
I work in a support project and having a hard time for finding the solution for the following request. Please help:
"The information requested is as follows: - Number of GL entries per period - Number of manual GL entries per period - Number of GL entries done during the closing period (days 1, 2, and 3, or 1 and 2 for LA) - Number of A/P invoices processed (total number of invoices and total number of lines in the A/P invoices) - Number of A/P payments processed (could we also capture the type of payment: check, electronic transfer) - Number of manual A/R entries (manual invoices, other manual entries like reclassification of balances, etc). - Number of credit notes raised - Number of cash application entries (can we distinguish manual and automated) - Number of users in each module (we are looking for actual users of the system). The fields I believe I need to satisfy this request are: For GL: GL posting date, posting period, company, batch id, number of records in batch, manual jnl/system jnl flag For AP: GL posting date, posting period, company, invoice/credit/payment id, number of distribution lines, transaction type For AR: GL posting date, posting period, company, invoice/credit/receipt id, number of distribution lines, transaction type method of payment"
Regards,
Ranjith

Hello.
select b.posted_date pdate,
h.period_name period,
sob.name company,
decode (l.reference_9, 'TRADE_REC', 'Receipt 1st Aplication',
'TRADE_UNID', 'Unidentified Receipt',
'TRADE_UNAPP', 'Receipt Unaplication',
'MISC_REMITTANCE', 'Miscellaneous Receipt',
'MISC_MISCCASH', 'Misc Receipt Distribution',
'TRADE_ACC', 'On Account Receipt',
'TRADE_REMITTANCE', 'Remmited Receipt',
'CMAPP_REC', 'Credit Memo',
'CCURR_REC', 'Receipt Aplication',
'CCURR_CURR_ROUND', 'Receipt App Rounding',
'INV_REC', 'Invoice Receivable',
'INV_TAX', 'Invoice Tax',
'INV_REV', 'Invoice Revenue') Event,
count(l.je_line_num) num_lines,
h.je_category trx_type
from gl_je_batches b,
gl_je_headers h,
gl_sets_of_books sob,
gl_je_lines l
where h.je_header_id = l.je_header_id
and b.je_batch_id = h.je_batch_id
and b.set_of_books_id = sob.set_of_books_id
and h.je_source = 'Receivables'
and h.period_name = <your period_name>
group by b.posted_date, h.period_name, sob.name, h.je_category, h.je_source, l.reference_2,decode (l.reference_9, 'TRADE_REC', 'Receipt 1st Aplication',
'TRADE_UNID', 'Unidentified Receipt',
'TRADE_UNAPP', 'Receipt Unaplication',
'MISC_REMITTANCE', 'Miscellaneous Receipt',
'MISC_MISCCASH', 'Misc Receipt Distribution',
'TRADE_ACC', 'On Account Receipt',
'TRADE_REMITTANCE', 'Remmited Receipt',
'CMAPP_REC', 'Credit Memo',
'CCURR_REC', 'Receipt Aplication',
'CCURR_CURR_ROUND', 'Receipt App Rounding',
'INV_REC', 'Invoice Receivable',
'INV_TAX', 'Invoice Tax',
'INV_REV', 'Invoice Revenue')
To get the id is very tricky...

Data Query combining AP, AR & GL

Hi Guys,
Can anyone give a solution for this please. This is a ticket pending with me and i am confused with this request. Please Help:
"The information requested is as follows: - Number of GL entries per period - Number of manual GL entries per period - Number of GL entries done during the closing period (days 1, 2, and 3, or 1 and 2 for LA) - Number of A/P invoices processed (total number of invoices and total number of lines in the A/P invoices) - Number of A/P payments processed (could we also capture the type of payment: check, electronic transfer) - Number of manual A/R entries (manual invoices, other manual entries like reclassification of balances, etc). - Number of credit notes raised - Number of cash application entries (can we distinguish manual and automated) - Number of users in each module (we are looking for actual users of the system). The fields I believe I need to satisfy this request are: For GL: GL posting date, posting period, company, batch id, number of records in batch, manual jnl/system jnl flag For AP: GL posting date, posting period, company, invoice/credit/payment id, number of distribution lines, transaction type For AR: GL posting date, posting period, company, invoice/credit/receipt id, number of distribution lines, transaction type method of payment."
Regards,
Ranjith

Use the reference columns i.e REFERENCE_1 to REFERENCE_10 of gl_je_lines table to join the AP, AR tables with the GL tables like the below query.
SELECT gjl.reference_1,
gjl.reference_2,
gjl.reference_4,
gjl.reference_5,
                    gjl.reference_10,
aia.doc_sequence_value,
aia.invoice_type_lookup_code,
aia.description invoice_description,
ada.prepay_distribution_id,
gjl.description,
aca.doc_sequence_value payment_doc_seq_number,
                    ada.invoice_id,
aia.doc_sequence_value
FROM gl.gl_je_headers gjh,
          gl.gl_je_lines gjl,
ap.ap_checks_all aca,
ap.ap_invoices_all aia,
ap.ap_invoice_distributions_all ada
WHERE gjl.je_header_id = gjh.je_header_id
AND aia.invoice_id(+) = gjl.reference_2
AND ada.invoice_id(+) = gjl.reference_2
AND ada.invoice_id(+) = gjl.reference_3
AND aca.check_id(+) = gjl.reference_3;
Thanks,
Lokesh.

F.19 GRIR reclassification - Item not selected in the report log

Hi Guru,
There are two items (one cleared pair) which are not selected into GRIR reclassification (Tcode F.19), both posting date is on 30.05.2007, while wiht cleared date on 30.06.2007 (clearing document with posting date on 31.05.2007), why they are not counted in the reclassification report. pls advice, I really donot have any clue about it.
Thanks,
Kick

Hi All,
why nobody reply this question, is it the question not clear?
There are two items (one cleared pair) which are not selected into GRIR reclassification (Tcode F.19), both posting date is on 30.05.2007, while with cleared date on 30.06.2007 (clearing document with posting date on 31.05.2007), why they are not counted in the reclassification report. the reclassification has been done on the last day of May. pls advice, I really donot have any clue about it.

RPIPSR00 date type fro exceptions

Hi all,
I'm using RPIPSR00 for pay scale reclassification but since some employees do not have the correct PS group in IT0008 (some exceptions due to transfers from other systems, etc and can't register that historical records) but I have the transfer date in IT0008 so I would like to have an alternative PS group entry date. Is there any date in IT0041 for overriding the date in IT0008 used to calculate the next PS Group/PS Level reclassification?
I tried field "next increase" and it works, nevertheless I would prefer to register the PS group entry date and let the system propose the next increase.
Thanks.
Sérgio.

Hello,
If you are going to use temporal type Date, then you should be using a java.sql.Date which prints off in the form yyyy-mm-dd for the query. Or, you can pass in the util.Date from Calendar.getInstance().getTime() directly to the query as a parameter using:
String queryString = "select o from TaskItemDAO o where o.parPlanId = '" + planId + "' and o.resourceId = '" + resourceId + "' and o.taskDate = :tastDate and o.endVer = -1";
Query selectQuery = em.createQuery(queryString);
selectQuery.setParameter("tastDate", taskDate, TemporalType.DATE);
Best Regards,
Chris

Reclassification where target/source does not equal trigger?

A challenge for reclassification, allocation or other BCS functionality:
Requirement:
Where two accounts net to either an asset or a liability, then the accounts that show the opposite sign to the net result must be reclassified to asset or liability.
Example:
Load from Data Stream:
Acct 1000 (asset) = +$1000
Acct 2000 (liability) = -$500
Net result = +$500 (asset)
-This is a positive number, therefore Acct 2000 (liability) value must be reclassified to Acct 1000 (asset):
and vice versa
Desired BCS reclasification:
Acct 1000 (asset) = -$500
Acct 2000 (liability) = +$500
BCS data after reclassification:
Acct 1000 (asset) = +$500
Acct 2000 (liability) = 0
Net result = +$500 (asset)
Standard reclassification
Standard Reclassifications don't seem to work because the source/target is always equal to the trigger (unless you add a percentage, which would not help this requirement)
Two steps would be required:
step 1. the trigger condition that the sum of both Acct 1000 and Acct 2000 = >0
Source is Acct 2000
Target is Acct 1000
but how do we reclassify only the Acct 1000 value NOT the whole amount?
step 2 would be the opposite: the trigger condition that the sum of both Acct 1000 and Acct 2000 <0
Source is Acct 1000
Target is Acct 2000
Again, how do we reclassify only the Act 2000 value?
Allocations
Allocation functionality contains a few options but I can't see any that would succeed:
- A specific fixed distribution wouldn't help because the values will change each period
- A distribution by ratio of existing results (usually used to allocate eg costs by proportion of sales) doesn't seem helpful either
Next steps
There might be some combination of (one-sided) reclassifications to statistical accounts, which then become a condition for a subsequent reclassificition or allocation but I haven't got anywhere.
Any suggestions?

Thansk Marsy, here it is here:
Dr/Cr Sign-triggered Reclassification
I hadn't realised (due to not having used it before) that once selected, the condition selections can be independent of the trigger selections.
Looks like this should give me what I need:
Example 1:
Load from Data Stream:
Acct 1000 (asset) = +$1000
Acct 2000 (liability) = -$500
Net result = +$500 (asset)
-This is a positive number, therefore Acct 2000 (liability) value must be reclassified to Acct 1000 (asset)
Example 2
Load from Data Stream:
Acct 1000 (asset) = +$1000
Acct 2000 (liability) = -$1500
Net result = -$500 (liability)
-This is a negative number, therefore Acct 1000 (asset) value must be reclassified to Acct 2000 (liability)
BCS reclassification setup (step 1 - net result is an asset)
Trigger = Accounts 2000
Condition = Acct 1000+2000 >0
Source = Acct 2000
Target = Acct 1000
BCS reclassification setup (step 2 - net result is a liability)
Trigger = Accounts 1000
Condition = Acct 1000+2000 <0
Source = Acct 1000
Target = Acct 2000
BCS data after reclassification - example 1:
Acct 1000 (asset) = +$500
Acct 2000 (liability) = $0
Net result = +$500 (asset)
BCS data after reclassification - example 2:
Acct 1000 (asset) = $0
Acct 2000 (liability) = -$500
Net result = -$500 (liability)

Legal \ management consolidation (What is the appropriate data model?)

Hi,
We are implementing SEM-BCS 6.0 with SAP BI 7.0.
For reporting purposes we have 2 types of consolidation:
Legal (external) and management (internal).
I have the following situation in a project (fictive names for companies):
Legal entity hierarchy is as follows:
Company Apple has business units A, B, C
Company Bello has business units A, D.
Management hierarchy is as follows
To the Business unit A belongs companies Apple and Bello.
Question is now: to be able to report in 2 different ways (legal and management reporting), having in account that for legal I consolidate by company and for management I consolidate by business areas:
Do I need to create 2 consolidation areas with each a data basis and perform financial consolidation twice (interunit eliminations (elimination of payables and receivables, elimination of revenue and expense, elimination of investment income) Elimination of Interunit Profit/Loss in Transferred Inventory, consolidation of investments, Reclassifications).
Or do I create one consolidation area with one databasis with 2 consolidation unit hierarchies.
For example, one hierarchy could have a structure of consolidation units as companies; another hierarchy could have a structure with business segments. (In our opinion this is the best way - Are we correct?)
If so, can we have the first hierarchy (legal) with consolidation unit (company) and partner unit (trading partner);
And the second hierarchy (management) with consolidation unit (business area) and partner unit (trading partner or trading partner's business area).
Thanks.
Ps: Our purpose is to have one databasis and one Financial Statement Item for both consolidations (legal and management).

Ricardo Pedro Rodrigues Ferrão wrote:
> Hi Eugene,
>
> Ill try to explain it better.
>
> For example the business unit A is portable pc and I have this business unit in both companies and what I want in management consolidation is to consolidate data by the business unit portable pc joining data from both companies.
>
> Thanks.
Ricardo,
I had similar business scenario in my earlier project and the expectations were almost same.
I created one consolidation area (legal consolidation) under one single data basis and assigned business area as sub-assignment. All the consolidation functions are executed by the business users based on legal cons requirements purpose, while the reports can be generated for both legal and management consolidation.
In management consolidation reporting, your expectations can be met easily. The header will be business area, while line item data will be companies wise (if you would like the data to display that way).
For more information, you can check the threads created by me.

ECCS : Proportional consolidation data selection

Hello Guys,
I want to include items into the consolidated statement using proportional consolidation (transcation CX26).
My problem is that with this tool i cannot select any item or apply any restricton to my source data : the standard program proportionally consolidate every items without exception.
Does any one of you have a solution to limit the proportional consolidation only to cetain items/posting level...?
Should I use another consolidation of investment tool to fulfill my requirement?
thank you in advance for your help
best regards
pascal

Hi Sylvie,
That's true: apportionement task will apply to all FS items.
If you want to reduce the apportionement scope, you can try to use a reclassification, which uses percentages, and limit the dataset in the triggering parameters.
Kind regards,
Grégoire

BCS Reclassification error

Hi, I am getting this error wile doing Reclassification of HFM Movement.
=====================================================================================================
Error msg, "Maximum selection does not contain value 9999999999 of subassignment HFM CD2 & Asset Type "
in the Data Monitor, ( in Reclass Net Reserve). While running BCF task for a company for period 16/2009
Actually, We have converted the consolidation area from XX(2009) to YY(2010).
Before this task, user has performed the balance carry forward.
=====================================================================================================
My Analysis is as follows:-
Method Used in this Reclassification
RECYX (Reclassify HFM Movement at YE lvl 10)
TRIGGER
Items : 100-299, 9900-9999
HFM Movement Type : O200 to O300
Posting Level : 10
TARGET
Items : 100-299, 9900-9999
Move : O100C
Posting Level : 10
HFM CD2 and Asset type : Ticked
=====================================================================================================
After TEST run in UCMON, the error message comes :-
The "HFM CD2 & Asset Type value 9999999999" is not maintained in Breakdown Categories Y500, Y700 etc.
=====================================================================================================
Breakdown categories in Workbench
Maintained as "OPTIONAL, Initialized value allowed".
=====================================================================================================
Single Selection
1A
1B
AR
GA
=====================================================================================================
Default Selection
99999999999
=====================================================================================================
BCS CUBE
HFM CD2 & Asset Type - coming blank
=====================================================================================================
LOTR
HFM CD2 & Asset Type - Coming blank
=====================================================================================================
Please help to go forward.
In Anticipation,
Deepankar

Thanks a lot Dan for the reply.
Yes, the single selection is 1A, 1B etc, I agree that including this default value 9999999999 in single selection will resolve this issue, but the BREAK DOWN TYPE is OPTIONAL, that means It will also consider a blank value, right?
Also, In the method defined for RECLASSIFICATION in workbench, in the TARGET parameters, the" HFM CD2 and Asset Type" is blank but the "DEFAULT is TICKED" which makes it a mandatory derivation rule.
Please correct me if I am wrong.
Your replies on it are highly appreciated.
Thanks and Regards,
Deepankar

Making Canada specifi changes to RPIPSR00 Payscale Reclassification Report

Hi Guru's,
We got the requirement to work around the standard SAP report Payscale Reclassification which RPIPSR00. Since this is not suits to our client specific Canada changes we are required to create a custom program or need to impliment BADI. Please find the following changes that we need to impliment in the custom progrem.
1.The program should automatically progress full-time employees which have reached the threshold (time in level or hours worked) to progress to the next level.
2. Employees that are part-time and must meet a certain number of actual hours to jump to next step in the progression program and this is done manually by HR. These employees should be excluded from the progression program but are included on the progression report.
3. Employees that require an examination prior to moving to the next level do not progress automatically. The manager notifies HR once they have completed the appropriate training and HR manually progresses them to the next step. These employees should be excluded from the progression program but are included on the progression report as due to progress pending examination. Need an indicator within the rules configuration to be able to note levels which require an examination prior to progression
3. Check for a temporary rate higher than next step rate
4.Not progress any employees that are part-time or require certification.
5. Program needs to read the IT0019 Date stored in u201CStep Progression Base Dateu201D field to determine when the previous progression date was. Step Progression program will need to update this date when the program is run to match the begin date (BEGDA) of IT0008 Reason Code u201CStep Progressionu201D.
6.Program should run report to automatically update the Pay Scale/Level for eligible employees and reflect this update on their IT0008 basic pay record.
Could you please advise me on this whether do we have any BADI's or Enhancements to achieve this requirement or need to go for Custom program with the prototype soluiton.
Thanks in advance for your time.
Regards,
J.
Moved the thread from SAP HCM to SAP North America

Dear Amit,
Thanks for your reply..
I have maintained the TARIFF and LGMST properly..
One employee has joined 02.01.2011.In configuration i have maintained the condition 1 year(11 months)..I have maintained the IT0041.
If run report RPIPSR00 i am getting the error..
Please correct me..
Regards,
R.Rajesh

Copy Data From a Parent to an Account - Legal (Periodic P&L Reclassificate)

Hi Gurus,
I'm in an implementation project at the BPC NW 7.5 SP04, being responsible for part of the consolidation. Currently I'm trying to find the best way to make a copy of the value of a node group hierarchy accounts P&L for a liability account.
After the data load the actual, from the BW InfoCube or from an Upload flat-file, must perform the reclassification mentioned periodically.
The issue is that there is two ways I know to copy the value to the account, one from the business rule of account transformantion and the other is by default logic included in the script logic.
I set the rule on account transformation placing the following code in the script and run:
* RUN_PROGRAM CALC_ACCOUNT
CATEGORY = %Versao_SET%
CURRENCY = %Groups_SET%
TID_RA = %MesAno_SET%
CALC = APUR_RESULT
OTHER = [ENTITY=TECSA] / /%% Empresa_SET] / / or OTHER = [Entity = C1000] or [ENTITY_SET ENTITY% =% =% INTCO INTCO_SET %...]
* ENDRUN_PROGRAM
It worked, but it took about 20 minutes to finish, the performance is very bad.
I put on the default logic the following command line:
* XDIM_MEMBERSET CONTA=3
* WHEN CONTA
* IS "3"
* REC (FACTOR=1, CONTA="PC012503030002")
* ENDWHEN
* COMMIT
Script logic can be run automatically after data is sent to database from BPC for Excel using the default,lgf, but do you know how to run it whenever there is a charge on a company ?
Can you help me? Telling me how to call this script, or correcting my business rule?
Best Regards
Alexandre Mendoza Collepicolo
P.s.: I tried use the col formula but this don't record the data so that is if I put this account as a parent, I need this recorded to do calcs.
Edited by: Alexandre Mendoza Collepicolo on Sep 22, 2010 9:19 PM

Hi Gersh and Nilanjan,
I did a test in a few minutes, I changed the code on default logic from this:
*XDIM_MEMBERSET CONTA = 3
*WHEN CONTA
*IS "3"
*REC(FACTOR=1,CONTA="PC012503030002")
*ENDWHEN
*COMMIT
to this:
*XDIM_MEMBERSET CONTA = PC013000000001
*WHEN CONTA
*IS "PC013000000001"
*REC(FACTOR=1,CONTA="PC012503030002")
*ENDWHEN
*COMMIT
And I load again the data, the default logic copy the value from PC013000000001 to PC012503030002, that is a good news for me, but with this I concluded, the script don't get value from parent, so is there a way to put a range of account on code ?
Best Regards
Alexandre Mendoza Collepicolo
Edited by: Alexandre Mendoza Collepicolo on Sep 23, 2010 2:27 PM

Reclassification

Hello All - Can you pls explain how Reclassification is done in SAP with an example.
"Our postings to Balance sheet accounts are posted to Dummy Profit center. Later they should be reclassified to their respective Specific Profit centers."
For the above, How entries should be posted as reclassification.
Thanks

Hi Ashish,
Generally, article reclassification is not a frequently used process, so can you tell me what kind of automation you are looking for and what is the exact process where you need such an automated re-classification.
All reclassification transactions need article(s) to perform the process, so automation is a challenge and if articles are known you can try scheduling the transactions in Background using a variant. In variant you can configure the execution time with Dynamic date calculation.
I hope this will help.
Regards,
Amit

Unstructured Name Parser - How to tell which Classification or Reclassification rules have been applied to a Name

I am using the EDQ Unstructured Name Parser and have a Name value that isn't getting parsed. I would like to know how the engine is classifying it or reclassifying it in order to set up some reclassification rules of my own to ensure that it gets resolved correctly.
The name is something like Thomas J. Hamilton,Jr ... I would expect it to classify as <valid Given>_<valid Initial>_<valid Family><P><valid Suff>. Given a data record, how can I trace it back to see how it was classified and resolved?

Hi Aaron,
For starters, you can change the parser to run in "Parse and Profile" mode in the Advanced Settings in order to output more intermediate metadata. Then I'd recommend filtering the data going into parser to isolate the record you're interested in. Either sample data in the reader in the run preferences or just insert a value check processor before the Parser.
Run the process through against and then look at the various steps of parsing in the different tabs of the results browser (Base tokenization, classification, unclassified tokens, etc.)
regards,
Nick

Intercompany Master Data

Hi,
We are currently having the following setup with regards to intercompany customers and vendors in our organization.
1. In case of a trading partner handling multiple activities/business units, we are creating 1 intercompany customer and vendor for each of the activity.
2. Name 3 field in XD03 or FD03 is used to denote the business unit or activity for each of these customers and vendors created.
3. We are using 8KER and 8KES to maintain a list of all trading partners, customer ids, and vendor ids and their default partner profit centers to ensure that we are able to perform intercompany reporting accordingly without manual efforts being spent in reclassification of Intercompany Balances from one activity to another.
4. These default partner profit centers is the same as the default partner activity of each trading partner.
However as a result of the above setup we are having lots of issues in the upstream Accounts Payable and Accounts Receivable processes. Some of the key issues are outlined below:
1. Unable to make consolidated payments per trading partner as multiple vendors are existing.
2. Incurring additional bank charges and service fees
3. Vendor Reconciliations and follow up requires additional headcounts
4. Multiple maintenance of master data
5. On account clearing would take more time since the task need to be performed for several customers
6. Tax classification need to be maintained multiple times
7. Users would select wrong customer and vendor codes when performing intercompany recharges
With above being mentioned, our aim is to have a single customer and vendor code per trading partner so that we are able to tackle the Accounts payable and receivable issues and also ensuring that no effort is spent in manually reclassifying the intercompany figures during the monthly, quarterly, half yearly and yearly closing process.
We would appreciate if someone can guide us on what is the SAP recommendation in this business scenario and what solutions are available to ensure that we maintain 1 customer and 1 vendor per trading partner without having any impact on the reporting steps. In case there are any solutions then please provide the same for ECC 6.0 EHP 4 (Classic Ledger) as well as for New General Ledger.
Please note that we are currently using ECC 6.0 EHP 4 (Classic Ledger) and SEM BCS 6.0 for consolidation.
Rgds
Venugopal Nair

Hi
Wellcome to SDN. These notes will be helpful
SAP Note 109254 - Customizing stock transport order Cross Company
SAP Note 308989 - Consulting note for cross-company transactions
SAP Note 543821 - FAQ: cross-company processing
Regards
Eduardo

Reclassification package running on GNONE group level

Hi all
I am having trouble with Reclassification process where BPC is posting at GNONE group level also with GROUP CURRENCY. Reclass is executing POST CONSOLIDATION DATA.
Ex:
Unit         Act       GROUP     DataSoruce                       Amount
1000    ACT1     GNONE       UPLOAD_DATA                200
1000    ACT1     GROUP1       UPLOAD_DATA               200   --- Post Consolidation Data
Reclass DM for Unit - 1000
Result:
1000    ACT1     GNONE       UPLOAD_DATA                200
1000    ACT1     GNONE       RECLASS                        - 200    : Post RECLASS
1000    ACT1     GROUP1       UPLOAD_DATA               200   --- Post Consolidation Data
1000    ACT1     GROUP1      RECLASS                        - 200   :   Post RECLASS
My concern is GNONE level from Reclass Result and I am using STANDARD BPC SCRIPPT Logic
Any Inputs are highly appreciated
Thanks
Ramana

Resolved now

Reclassification of Data..

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for