Reclassify vendor liability to GL account (Polish requirement)

Hey All,
I have a requirement where the client needs separate GL accounts for assets vendors vs regular non-asset vendors. We need to book fixed asset in a separate GL account for balance sheet reporting. So, I am looking for a report that will reclassify the asset vendors liability to a specific GL account and then reverse this posting as this is required only for legal reporting purpose.
The report FAGLF101 is supposed to carry out such reclassification and reverse postings but I am not sure how the report works.
Thanks for time!

Report works based on account determination (reconciliation account, mapped to target & adjustment account) defined in FBKP in Sort Payables/Receivables. Account determination is required for each valuation area or report gives account determination per valuation area error.

Similar Messages

Account 12221001 requires trading partner to be filled

Hi
The user had some old documents and he is trying to clear them.
During clearing he is facing an error "Account 12221001 requires trading partner to be filled"
Trading partner field is blank in the reconciliation account 12221001 and also customer account.
BSEG of the document which gives the problem. The reconciliation account is 12221001, the trading partner for the customer line is not filled in.
How can we fill the trading partner on this line item?
Thanks in Advance,
Deepthi.

hi,
trading partner field is populated from account , customer or vendor.
if your customer wants to clear old documents, most probably, some documents are filled with trading partner field and others are not.
in this situation you cannot clear these documents.
i have faced the same iproblem. to solve it, you should determine the balance of trading partner included documents,
you should post two documents using a dummy document.
lets say the balance is 20.000 usd
you should post: (initially you should maintain trading partner field in customer data)
DR/CR customer.........20.000usd
CR/DR dummy acc. ..........20.000 usd
second posting ( you should clear the trading partner field in customer data)
CR/DR custoemr......20.0000usd
DR/CR dummy acc.....20.000 usd
now you can clear items with trading partner is filled.

Change of Vendor Master Re-con Account in MIRO Transaction

Hi Friends.
Thanks in Advance,
Requirement : While Posting the MIRO Transaction, Vendor Master Re-con Account has to be Replace by other Re-con account
Using Business Transactions Events this can be achived and sucessfully replaced. also data based Tables BSEG also updated sucessfully.
But the problem is when viewing the reports like FAGLL03, FAGLB03 we can able to view the data against that G/L Account.
Regards:
Sridhar.J

Hi Sridhar,
Let me know what is the business requirement to assign separate GL account while doing MIRO ? Which BTE used for that ? If you don't mind.
Rgds
SumaMani

User exit after selecting vendor with multiple bank accounts

Hi,
the requirement is that a pop-up should appear after the user selects a vendor with multiple bank accounts, in transaction MIRO, FB60, F-43 and a few other transactions.
I was thinking of a user exit. Honestly, I wonder if this is technically possible ?
Any hints welcome,
regards,
Rolf
Message was edited by:
Rolf Schorpion

HI
I believe u have to change the std programs to do that.
Max

Vendor liability is not created

Dear SAP Gurus',
One Stock Transport Order is being created PO -123456. For transport of a Material from plant 0001 to 0002.
Here, plant 0001 is under 1000 business area and plant 0002 is under 0002 business area.
But,in account assignment,Business area is showing 1000 instead of 0002.
While doing MIRO,vendor liability is not created.
Regards

Hi,
Miro allowed business place change. Have you got any message?
regards

Report Vendor Liability

HI.
There is somente report thar I can see the vendor liability in the past ? Let me explaim.
I Want to know what is the situation in the setember.
Thanks a lot.
Wagner

Hello Wagner,
There is no real way to get Historical Liability Report / Vendor Aging Report.
You could try running a GL Report by selecting Accounts Payable Account (Only Check Accounts)
Financials > Financial Reports > Accounting > General Ledger
Suda

Account 76701000 requires an assignment of CO object-Reversal of Invoice

Statndard PO has been created by business . They did the IR without GR as they usually does. Now business is not going to procure material from the vendor they are not going to receive the material, But IR has been done, Now they want to reverse the IR document. But while reversing the IR document they are getting error- Account 76701000 requires an assignment of CO object.
I have option to enter the cost center or order in the master data level. But is there any possibility to do the changes at PO level.
But its surprise when we post the IR , no posting done in cost accounting , But while reversing why its asking for cost element, When i did the analysis Reversal is hitting PRD account key.
I can do enter the cost center in the CO object and reverse the IR, But when i check in the FI costing document its showing zero values.I did it quality server, But Business is denied this solution and wants to do changes at PO level.
Let me is there anyway to change the PO.
Please help me to resolve this ASAP. IR has to be reverse for this PO.
Edited by: varikais on Sep 8, 2011 6:53 AM

hi
In PRODUCTION server , there is no account in EIN/EKG In OBYC.
also there no account maintenance for 602010 as a cost element in OKB9. But Error for CO object (while procurement of raw material) is not coming. WHY THIS?
And CO object error comes only in DEV server.while procurement of raw material.Though we use MTO in DEV.
I get confuse pl explain.(URGENTLY)
Edited by: harshad deshmukh on Jun 18, 2008 12:32 PM

Vendor Liability !!

HI
Our client has a requirement. When they raise a PO for a particular vendor and try to save it - the system should give a warning or error showing us our liability (exceeding the predefined limits) to that vendor.
How to do it? Any idea ??

Friend
With out SAP FI Budgeting there is no SAP Standard functionality in MM which can address this requirement. We can develop a similar - limited functionality as that of FI - Budegeting.
1. Maintain a class with class type "010" using Transaction code using trnsaction code CL01.
2. Create a characterstics with description as vendor budget limitation .... and this characterstics should be of format with data type currency with multiple value assignment - so that you can maintain range. this is where you maintain budget value.
For Example Vendor V1 liability can reach upto Rs 1,00,000/-
or Vendor V2 liablity can bein Rs 1.00000/- to Rs 2,00 000/-
Characterstics are created uisng transaction code CT04 and are assinged to class created in Step1 using Cl01 in change mode.
3. Assing this class to vendor master record either during vendor create XK01 or during vendor change XK02
3.a Inside vendor master screen click on Environment menu and click on classification submenu you will be navigated to Vendor Classifcation screen assign class created in step 1 here
3.b Maitain values for each of the vendor in the charactestics value grid.
save your entires.
4. Next big thing would be by making use of available user exits in PO Program validating vendor Budget values maitnained step 3 & checking open PO and its values and then finally comming out with message vendor liability exceded or below limit ...........................
There is lot of validation to be checked depending on business requirement
ENJOY SAP
Regards

Account field required for some users, not for others in URM when checking

I am running into a real show stopper. I have been working in our development database, and have tested checking in content multiple times with no problems. I recently turned it over to my users to begin testing and they can not even check in one document, because they receive an error stating that the account is required. I know just enough to be dangerous, so I am not quite sure how to solve this one. It makes no sense to me that on my check in screen, account is not required and yet on all of my users check in screens, not only is it required, but nothing they enter is accepted as a valid value, so they can't even get past it. I would just as soon not have account show up or be required, but have struggled with making that happen, since it is not a custom metadata field. It appears to be a delivered field used for security purposes? any help would be appreciated! Thanks.
One more thing that I noticed that may be helpful in diagnosing this is that my profile has no accounts, just #none,#all
whereas the user's profiles have a number of different accounts listed in their profile. Could this be part of the reason that they are forced to enter an account when checking in content and I am not?
If so, how can I get around this?
Edited by: user10985708 on Apr 7, 2009 12:21 PM

That´s a little strange behaviour becouse normally the account field is not required as default.
You could try a global rule setting the Account field not to be required with some IDOC.
But as you say you´re not using accounts anyway i´d suggest removing it from your server instance.
In the server\config\CONFIG.CFG file look for UseAccounts=true set it to false and the field won´t bother you anymore.

One Vendor and two Reconciliation Accounts?

Hi All,
I have to post the invoices sent by a certain Vendor into two Reconciliation Accounts, according to the type of purchase (the Vendor makes two types of activity).
Unfortunately, in the master data of the vendor (company data) I can fill in only one Reconciliation Account ...
Could anyone suggest me a solution?
Thanks
Gandalf

Hi,
As mentioned in the mails below, to achieve this you have to define alternative accounts wherin you mention that against a particular econ account mentioned in your Vendor master what all Recon account are allowed.
Secondly, in your Vendor master data also you have to tick the Recon Account ready for input tick. This will ask for a recon account whenever you enter entry in that vendor account.
Thirdly for control purposes you can either write a validation for the recon account that you are entering in the Vendor master data that no postings can be made in this recon account. By this system will always ask you for an alternate account and that will help you.
Regards,
SAPFICO

Error - G/L account 407350 requires a valid tax codeu201D.

I am getting error "G/L account 407350 requires a valid tax codeu201D, while executing F-28 transaction.
IF there are any User-exit available to resole this issue ?

Rather than the use-exit, I suggest you to discuss this with configuration consultant who can make some change on the configuration and eliminate the error.
>
batramanish wrote:
> I am getting error "G/L account 407350 requires a valid tax codeu201D, while executing F-28 transaction.
> IF there are any User-exit available to resole this issue ?

F110 Payment to vendor with several bank accounts

Hi to all,
I have a vendor with 2 bank accounts, each one for its subisidiaries .
We pay this vendor's head office via transfer and to do so, use transaction F110. Depending on the subsidiary, our vendor wants us to use one account or the other.
All open items go under the head office number, my question is: how do I assign the right bank account to the open items?
I tried with the alternative payer funcionality but did not work.
Can you please help?
Cheers

The BVTYP is free. If a bank account accepts only one currency, the easiest is to take this currency as BVTYP in LFBK. You should have your own rules for the others cases: for example BVTYP 'EUR' for euro and 'OTHE' for all others currencies. You should use substitution with user exit. If you don't know the technique, please search in forums with keyword 'RGGBS000'.
The user exit should do the following (for example):
1) search in LFBK one row with LIFNR = BSEG-LIFNR and BVTYP = BKPF-WAERS.
if found then BSEG-BVTYP = BKPF-WAERS
2) if not found, search in LFBK one row with LIFNR = BSEG-LIFNR and BVTYP = 'OTHE'.
if found then BSEG-BVTYP = 'OTHE'.
3) if not found, do nothing; BSEG-BVTYP remains empty.
- With such an exit, you have to fill BVTYP in LFBK only when the suppllier has more than 1 bank account.
- You should also decide whether BVTYP should be ready for input or not; if yes you should decide what has priority: user's input or substitution (but I think that leaving the field ready for input and overwrite it in substitution has no sense and is dangerous, so in this case the substitution should do nothing for non empty BSEG-BVTYP).

Payment proposal for vendor with multiple bank accounts

Hi there,
I'm currently dealing with payment proposals (F110) with two conditions:
1): several documents with different currencies are attached in the same payment run (one in GBP, one in USD and one in EUR)
2): several banks are defined for that vendor in the master data. We assume that that three banks are defined in the master records (one in GBP, one in USD and one in EUR)
We started developing a user exit to find a way to have the correct bank selected in depending on the document currency; it worked but only for one document-->payment is done to the right bank account even if the vendor has different bank accounts. Whenever several documents for the same vendor are included into the payment proposal, only one bank is selected out of our program, corresponding to the first document.
I wonder if there is a way for setting up a bank selection in another way.
NB: the partner bank type solution within the document is not an option as the sites (which are creating the PO) don't know about bank details and therefore don't indicate anything.
Thanks for reply!
regards,
FX

When you enter bank details in master, update field "Partner bank type" LFBK-BVTYP with free form value, may be currency is good choice.
During invoice entry, this field is available for update, update which bank to be used for payment of this invoice. You may build logic to populate this field, like substitution to populate currency in this field during invoice posting.
During payment, system checks value in field Partner bank type in invoice and selects corresponding bank.
Hope this helps.

Account 555555 requires an assignment to a CO object

I am receiving following error in posting:
account 555555 requires an assignment to a CO object
please help

Hi,
For the GL account Cost center is the mandatory feild for posting to accounts.
Check IT0001or IT0027 if cost center is attached to the employees associated to the GL account.
Regards,
Hemant V. Mahale

Account 1910116 requires an assignment to a CO object

Hi,
I had error: Account 1910116 requires an assignment to a CO object when i tried to post to GL Account 1910116. Then I input the cost center. Then i got Enter a true account assignment object with revenues error.
Please advice me on the matter.
I would appreciate if also can advice where is the setting for tru account assignment.

Hi,
it shows that ,You made an account assignment for A/C 1910116, a revenue element, in controlling area 4444 to a cost center or profit center.
Cost centers and profit centers can carry revenues in the SAP system as statistics only. To ensure reconciliation between FI and CO for revenue element 1910116, a CO account assignment object must record the revenues as a real value. This object type is used for updating to the reconciliation ledger.
In principle, it is possible for the SAP system to automatically derive this CO account assignment object, the reconciliation object. However, all postings made in CO for costing-based Profitability Analysis are logged in the reconciliation ledger under "reconciliation object". In this manner, the reconciliation ledger identifies the exact values flowing into the operating profit. If you post reconciliation objects during revenue postings to cost centers or profit centers, you must do so while keeping the interpretation of the reconciliation ledger reports in mind. The sums of revenue postings to profitability segments, cost centers, and profit centers cannot be broken down further.
To avoid posting to reconciliation objects, make account assignments to a real CO account assignment object.
or else, you can change the message controll ,following below mentioned path :
Controlling --> General Controlling --> Change message control
Hope it helps.
Dhara.

Reclassify vendor liability to GL account (Polish requirement)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for