Restricting authobject I_QMEL for Quality notifications and HR PCRs

Hello,
We have encountered an role conflict when the authorization object I_QMEL is used both for Quality notification and HR PCR access on the portal. Here is the scenario.
Quality Administrator has I_QMEL for:
- notification type X
- transaction IQS1 and IQS2
- all work is done in the GUI
Employee who is a Manager has I_QMEL for:
- notification type Z
- transactions IQS1 and IQS2
- all work is done on the portal
The role conflict arises when one user has both the Quality Administrator role and the Manage role. The user can then use the GUI to view notifications of type Z - that any manager has submitted. This means the user can view all personnel change requests in the systems. These PCRs contain sensitive information.
Any ideas on how I can design the security such that this role conflict is suppressed?
Thanks!

Hi Vicky,
I have the same problems you had. I also need to implement your requirements 2) and 3)
How have you solved your requirements? Please let me know your solutions.
Thanks in advance
Sarah

Similar Messages

Assign Execute and Review for Quality Notification

Hello Experts,
Can we configure the workflow WS24500047 or is their any change in configuration in SPRO so that we can make the following business scenario.
1- Quality Administrator will create quality notification in QM01.
2- Quality Administrator will assign the task to the responsible person for eg. User1 is responsible to complete the task to fix a bolt of a machine
3- After fixing the issue. User1 will make the the task complete and request to close the task
4- Other User say Reviewer will see the request from User1 and finds the the task is properly done and he will make a request to the approver to close the task
5- The approver will approve the request and close the task.
6- And if the all the task of the quality notification is complete then
quality administrator will complete the quality notification and close the task.
in other words.
QA (will create the Quality notification and assign to user) --> User1 (Fix the issue and make a request to complete the outstanding task to the reviewer ) --> Reviewer (Inspect and make a request to the Approver to approve and close the outstanding task) --> QA (finally close the quality notification after completion of all Outstanding tasks)
Thanks and Regards,
Kuldeep Verma

Hi Kuldeep,
You have to generate 3 SAP Login ID's like ...
1. Q_01 : Who will have the rights of Creating & Changing the Notification. He will also have the right to complete the Notification as wel as revoke it.
2. Q_02 : Who will have the rights to enter the details about the Task and its activities as you said fix a bolt on machine.
3. Q_03 : Who will have the rights to review the whole process thru closing the Task.
I feel that there is no need to have fourth one in picture as your all requirement can meet within these three.
Please revert with comments.

Electronic signatures for Quality Notifications

We are on 4.0b system and thinking of implementing electronic signatures functionality for quality notifications. Since SAP standard does not have this functionality we are planning to use Enhancement QQMA0014, function module exit EXIT_SAPMIWO0_020.
To this effect, we are requesting your guidance for the following
1.Is this customer exit available in latest version of SAP ?
2. If we store these signatures (user id , date and time) in an custom table, can we move this custom table ,once we upgrade to a higher version.
3. Is there any other way to implement electronic signatures for quality notifications in version 4.0b.

Hi Isabelle,
Thanks for your patience in understanding my question.
My primary worry is if i use this exit to have electronic signatures in 4.0b and i know this functionality (Electronic signatures) is standard in latest versions, what will happen to the electronic signature data that i create until i upgrade.
The electronic signature data is the user id , date and time associated with a notification. I plan to store this in a custom table.
I will appreciate , if you can share with me your analysis.
Thanks
Manoj Jain

Auto Quality Notification and Return Delivery Via Usage Decision

Hello Gurus
Need help !
I am using the Quality inspection with Material Specification.
Just an overview of my current system settings -
Inspection Type 101 for Purchased parts , My Inspection characteristics and Batch Charracteristics are linked .Batch classification is updated as a result of Usage Deceision
My Requirement -
If the Inspection lot is getting rejected , system should trigger the Quality notification and return delievery automatically .
Can someone pl help me with detailed steps for acheiving this...
Reqward points will be given immediatly for sharing thoughts
BR

Hi
Thanks for reply.
I think I missed some thing in my question
I understand that this is Standard Sap when you post the stock into Return Deilivery stock , it 'll do the movement type 122 and create the material docuement.
However My requiremnet is to get the Delivery Document number with the reference of which i can do the PGI .
I gone thru the SAP help and learnt that we can trigger the Quality notification automatically if we reject the inspection lot...But not confident "how" as never done before..that the reason i posted my query if someone has done this before..
OR
Any option to create Delivery Document when rejecting one Inspection Lot is UD..W/o Notification also will work for me..
So I am aiming to get Delivery Document not material document as our materials are WM managed...
Could some one put some light on this...
BR

MB56 for quality notifications?

Hi all,
is there a possibility to see quality notifications for substream materials which were consumed for production of a finished good? I mean a kind of MB56 for quality notifications.You enter the finished goods material and batch and see if there were notifications for a material which was used to produce the finished good?
Does this exist somewhere in the R3 - system?
Thank you for your help!
Alex

Hi Isabelle,
Thanks for your patience in understanding my question.
My primary worry is if i use this exit to have electronic signatures in 4.0b and i know this functionality (Electronic signatures) is standard in latest versions, what will happen to the electronic signature data that i create until i upgrade.
The electronic signature data is the user id , date and time associated with a notification. I plan to store this in a custom table.
I will appreciate , if you can share with me your analysis.
Thanks
Manoj Jain

Set a User Status for Quality Notifications only if they are "Activated".

Hello experts:
I need to be able to set a User Status for Quality Notifications only if they are "Activated".
When defects are recorded for an inspection lot, a "Defect Notification" is created which can be activated to become a "Quality Notification". Initially, the only difference between the inactive "Defect Notification" and the active "Quality Notification" is that the system status DEFR is active for the "Defect Notification", but is cleared when the notification is activated.
So, I'm looking for the business process associated with the Activation to use as a trigger for my own user status.
I checked the business rules for status DEFR and found that the following processes clear this status
PMM1 - Postpone Notification
PMM2 - Put Notification In Process
PMM3 - Assign Order
PMM6 - Put Notification In Process Again
Any Ideas ?

Perhaps some additional information would help you understand what I need to do.
For notification type F3, we are recording all defects found in production.
Most of these are expected defects that result in a minor reduction in yield.
For this type of defect, we do not activate the notification, and the inspection lot is closed automatically at the end of production.
However, sometimes defects are observed of an unexpected type or a higher than expected quantity.
When this happens we manually activate the notification and assign tasks to find and correct the cause.
It is only for these activated notifications that I want to automatically set a user status, which among other things, will prevent the notification from being closed until some other actions are complete and a different user status is selected.
The function of the user status currently works exactly as I want, but if it is set as the initial status for all F3 notifications, it is also preventing the un-activated defect notifications from automatically closing. I therefore want to use the Activation event as the trigger to set my user status.

Update System Status for Quality Notification

I have a program that completes a Quality Notification.
I would like to know if there is a bapi, badi or function module to change the system status before I complete the notification. When I click on the icon in the notification to complete it, a pop up box comes up to change the status to NOTI or NOTE. I would like to do the same in my program before I complete it.
Any help would be appreciated.
Marianne

Hi,
You need to get the OBJNR(object number) for the notifications and then use the FM: STATUS_READ.
This FM will give you list of all the status or only active status( Set ONLY_ACTIVE = X in FM)..
Hope this helps
Regards
Shiva

User status for quality notification

Hi All,
from which table we can get user status for a particular notification which is active status.
Thanks in advance

Hi,
You need to get the OBJNR(object number) for the notifications and then use the FM: STATUS_READ.
This FM will give you list of all the status or only active status( Set ONLY_ACTIVE = X in FM)..
Hope this helps
Regards
Shiva

Queries:Editable ALV - Without OO concept and BAPI for Quality notification

Hi Abaper's,
1. Is there a possibility of giving F4 help for an editable field in Classical ALV ?
2. Could anyone suggest bapi for changing notification status in QM02 ? Approving/Rejecting/Closing Notifications.
Regards,
Kausthub

Status profile for Quality notification

I want to restrict users untill notification is approved, they can not do it complete
Dear All,
I want to restrict users untill notification is approved, they can not do it complete.
I have created status profile through BS02 as ZQM02 where 3 status no I have given:
10-INIT>Init status checked>lower limit-10 higherlimit-20>Position 1>priority>1
20-APPR>Init status not checked>lower limit-10 higherlimit-20>Position 1>priority>1
30-COMP>Init status not checked>lower limit-10 higherlimit-30>Position 1>priority>1
Allowed Object types>Quality Notification checked
In transaction control Complete notification marked as forbidd.
But it is not working, I can still mark as complete without marking it approved.
status screen also not changing even after completion of notification, it still showing
under status no 10 >INIT
Plz advice what I am missing and how I can do this.
regards,
sp shukla

OK. I think you are confused 2 things.
First.. you have to create 2 kinds of status profile. One is for notification and another is for task.
Second.. 'next action' means not next transaction. It means automatic set when the transaction is excuted.
Try below.
1) status profile 'A' for notification (select 'quality notification' only for object type)
10-INIT-initial-forbid 'complete notification'-nothing other transaction
20-APPR-allow 'complete notification'-set 'put in process(released)' (this means a notification will be set 'APPR' automaticaaly when you release a notification and user can complete it.)
30-COMP-set 'complete notification' (this means a notification will be set 'COMP' automatically when you complete it.)
2) status profile 'B' for task (select 'task' only for object type)
10-INIT-initial-nothing other transaction
20-REL-forbid 'delete task'-set 'release task' (this means a task will be set 'REL' automatically when you release a task and user cannot delete it anymore.)
3) assign both in configuration
'A' for notification
'B' for task
Regards
Luke

Action Box customizing for Quality notifications

Hi all,
In the customizing Quality Notifications ->Qualyty Notifications->Notification processing->Aditional Notification Funtions->Define Action Box. Inside of de Action definitions, a field for Workflows or Standard Task is avalilable. (in specific details for task).
Any one know how it works? No Binding defined?
I mean, in the customizing of Quality notification Actions, Workflow (or TS) could be included in the specific detail. I do not understand how that could work since no binding is defined.
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
Finally after a lot of tests, looks like the Workflow is trigered when save and recieve a Task object for inport parameter (I mean, my Workflow has as input object QMSM and it is been populated - Create Workitem in error if I add Notification as input too).
I hope this would be usefull if someone more has the same doubt in the future and look for some help in this foro.
Regards,
Paco
PD: Yo me lo guiso, yo me lo como. (yo pregunto, yo me respondo).
PPD: I have answered my self....I do not obtain points for that? XD.

Quality Notification and Inspection Lots

Hello everyone:
Does anyone have an SAP environment in which the quality notifications are generated automatically followed by inspection lot creation? In these instances please explain how you manage to assign the quality notifications to the related inspection lots.
I am working on a project to create quality notifications at the time of receipt into quality inspection stock then inspection lot creation/results recording and subsequent automatic closure of quality notifications.
Appreciate your feedback.
Thank you.

Genrally it's not the way it operates, but I can understand the way business forces their requirements on SAP team. The way you have given the requirements, it can done but everything has to be done through development. I never come across this type of requirement but you can check the following stuff.
1. As per SAP, once the material is received (any case Ware houes managed/ or simple IM) based on the master data set up system creates inspection lot and put the quality into stock. So, If you want to create q -note prior to inspection lot creation either it should be manual or independant of goods receipt. I suggest, find a user exit which fires at the time of GR (just before insp.lot gets created) and create the q-note based on the information from the p.o. There standard sap BAPI's available, so no complex developmen is required. Just need to find the correct user exit and timing of creating q-notes. What minmum required fields for your q-note? Do you want any defects info to be passed on to q-note from the data you maintain in MIC? You need see all these things before you go with creating prior q-note.
2. The biggest challenge will be mtaching the q-notes created in advance to the defects/out of spec. recorded during result.recording. Again if you have a smart developer, I think it is possible. Find out the user exit/ or any BADI which can be used when the results are out of spec., turn on standard settings of SAP to create a defect record but while q-note is generated(standard sap functionality) for defect - force your logic to find out the corresponding q-note which was already created and update it with defect info. You can explore passing p.o/item number as refe. no to q-note when it was created and same can be used in add. to your Material/plant/serial no if required.
I am sure, it's a challenging one and not the normal way we do in sap, but you have to go for it if business insists. In general its not the way I have seen, may be other experts might have come across.
Hope it helps.
Thanks,
Ram

Show long text for Quality Notification when double click field in alv

I have an ALV grid called using a FM and I am using the user command routine to do somthing when a particular cell is clicked. I want to call up the root cause text from the action box of the QN via QM03 . I am building a BDC table to call with a CALL transaction but when I write my BDC up to that point, the program is running the BDC but not going to the point where the long text is displayed is i am in mode 'N'.
FORM user_command USING r_ucomm LIKE sy-ucomm
                         rs_selfield TYPE slis_selfield.
READ TABLE itab INDEX rs_selfield-tabindex.
CASE r_ucomm.
    WHEN '&IC1'.
      CASE rs_selfield-fieldname.
* When double click on root cause, display root cause long text
        WHEN 'ZZ_URCOD'.
          PERFORM display_root_cause_text.
          CALL TRANSACTION 'QM03' USING gt_bdc MODE 'N'.
ENDCASE.
ENDFORM.                    "user_command
FORM display_root_cause_text .
FREE gt_bdc.
PERFORM fill_bdc USING 'SAPLIQS0'     '0200'      'X'.
PERFORM fill_bdc USING 'RIWO00-QMNUM' itab-qmnum space.
PERFORM fill_bdc USING 'SAPLIQS0'     '7200'      'X'.
PERFORM fill_bdc USING 'BDC_OKCODE' '=10\TAB03' space.
PERFORM fill_bdc USING 'SAPLIQS0'     '7200'      'X'.
PERFORM fill_bdc USING 'BDC_CURSOR'
                         'QMICON-LTURSACHE(01)'     space.
PERFORM fill_bdc USING 'BDC_OKCODE' '=UX01' space.
ENDFORM.                    " DISPLAY_ROOT_CAUSE_TEXT
Any one have any suggestions of know of a BAPI that I can achieve the same thing?
Thanks
Larissa Maryniuk

Hello,
also try to use the messages clause (of type BDCMSGCOLL).
This will return the system messages.
call transaction 'XXXX' using BDCTAB
                                        mode 'P'
                                        messages into MSG_TAB.
Try to change the mode from 'N' to 'P' and try to place a breakpoint and check what happens.
Alternatively, you can read the Quality Notification text using FM READ_TEXT, and then show this data to the user in pop-up, rather than calling the tx.
Hope this helps.

QM: Color of exception light for quality notification in QM11

Hi,
When I execute transaction QM11 to get an overview of the quality notifications there is a column with exception. This light can be green, yellow and red. But where can i check what these colors mean? Can this be changed in customizing?
Regards,
Maarten

Refer the Links
[Traffic Lights|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/80/1a663ce07211d2acb80000e829fbfe/content.htm]
[ARticle|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/303564dc-3531-2a10-0fa3-be6426c3d61b]
Regards,
Shyamal
Edited by: Shyamal Joshi on Sep 5, 2008 7:00 PM

HT5463 How can I, with my new iphone 5, set everything to vibrate only? ...I mean quickly go to vibrate only(for all notifications and calls) from my normal audio settings?

How can I go from normally selected rings and fnotifications to 'vibrate only' for all calls and notifications?

Have you tried using the Ring/Silent switch on the upper left side? If it's set to 'orange', I think it only vibrates for almost everything, with a few exceptions.

Restricting authobject I_QMEL for Quality notifications and HR PCRs

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for