SAP PI Modeling: Two Business systems with party

I am triing to create SAP BPVT Interaction model that describe connection of 2 process components. Each of that components must be business systems with party. As I understand process component must be Process component at business partner for assigning business system with party.
If I create SAP BPVT Interaction model with two Process component at business partner, I get they connection in type of "Other Interaction". When I try create new assigment, I get error "Unable to assign the model to this connection type due to the method or profile in use".
How can I create correct connection?

Hi Eugenia,
Please see note 1084315 which descriibes the the multiple backend scenario.
This should be relevant here.
Best regards
Christophe

Similar Messages

Business System with or without Party

Hello,
I've a interface RFC to JDBC syncrhonous
I've two CC sender (RFC) for the same interface, one for each client. The test for one client is ok however the test in other client result with the follow error:
'aternativeServiceIdentifier: party/servce from channel configuration are not equal to party/service from lookup of alternativeServiceIdentifier..', I have seen the 730870 note (Q26) but i don't see how solved my problem.
1.- Somebody can explain me the difference betwen using business system with party or business system without party in the integration directory?
Thanks very much.

>
silvia diego wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I've a interface RFC to JDBC syncrhonous
> I've two CC sender (RFC) for the same interface, one for each client. The test for one client is ok however the test in other client result with the follow error:
>
> 'aternativeServiceIdentifier: party/servce from channel configuration are not equal to party/service from lookup of alternativeServiceIdentifier..', I have seen the 730870 note (Q26) but i don't see how solved my problem.
/people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2008/01/08/troubleshooting--rfc-and-soap-scenarios-updated-on-20042009
>
> 1.- Somebody can explain me the difference betwen using business system with party or business system without party in the integration directory?
>
> Thanks very much.
in you case you dont ahve to use a part. You have different Business services.
Configure you RFC adapters, one for each client.
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/03/29/configuring-the-sender-rfc-adapter--step-by-step

Connect one Business system with two Integration Server

Hello,
Can we able to connect one Business System with two Integration Server?
I have one Business system (ECC 6.0 with the client 900) and it is already connected with PI 7.0 system.Can I able to connect the same sytem (with same client) with PI7.1?
I want to do the HTTP Connection for ABAP Proxy for this two XI system with one business Sytem ?
Is this possible ?Is there any work around solution there?
Thanks.

Hello ,
This document describes about connecting with Two PI7.1 system using Application Server 7.1 and Application Server 7.0 SP14 .
I want to connect same ECC system via abap proxy with two different PI system .One is PI7.0 and another one is PI7.1 system.
Is this possible if i use Application Server 7.1 or Application Server 7.0 SP14 ?
Thanks.
Lakshmi
Edited by: Muthulakshmi Pandi on Apr 16, 2009 11:48 PM
Edited by: Muthulakshmi Pandi on Apr 17, 2009 12:21 AM

SLD: Pointing two business systems to the same client...

Hi Guys,
Is there anyway to make two business systems point to the same client(on the same r/3 technical system)? how about a work around?
Thanks,
Harsh

Harsh,
>><i>Finally all collapse to one client in production.</i>
Even though you will have multiple Business Systems in every envrionment, the final transport will happen from only one environment.
DEV --> QA --> PROD. In this case, objects are moved from dev to qa and then from QA to prod and so, all you will need is the trasnport target created in the QA business systems pointing to the Prod busines system and do the transport.
><i>While transporting to a new SLD(quality to prod) can I choose one transport target for multiple source business systems?</i>
Take a look at this document for multiple SLD transports. Should answer all doubts,
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/9e76e511-0d01-0010-5c9d-9f768d644808
Regards,
Bhavesh

Why "Business System" under "Party"

Hi,
As per my understanding, the "Party" in IB-Config is mainly used for B2B integration and "Service without Party" is mainly used for A2A integration.
Under B2B scenario, one won't know the details of the application details of the partner's application, therefor we use "Business Service" , similarly for A2A scenario, one has the knowledge of the applications within the same organization and thereyby we use "Business System" in ID.
If my above statement is true ,then why do we have "Business System" under "Party" while defining the Collaboration Profile Objects in Integration Directory and similarly why do we have "Business Service" under "Service without party"?
Thanking all of you in advance.
SR

Your are correct , but in order to use Business service or Business system A2A and B2B may not be the reason always.
you are free to use Business Service for A2A scenario ,if you don't have concrete information of the system in SLD , e.g published Webservices(sender or reciever).
Similarly , you can use Business System for B2B scenario,if you have enough information of a system which can defined in SLD , e.g Customer SAP ERP .

Can we define two business system for a Client.

Hi XI Experts,
          We are facing problem regarding the Technical & business system in SLD.
          For deploying the readymade .tpz files , we have to define a technical system as ABAP in SLD.
          under this Technical system one Business system with specific name to be defined.
           But problem is that in Custmor's landscape they have already defined a Technical system & corresponding Business system for a specific client 250.
so while adding the new business system to existing technical system we are facing error:--
        Business system is alredy define for this client , choose another client.
    as a second option we defined a new technical system and when we try to define the new business system under this it also throw error:-
         Client is associated with Logical system name of existing business system.
        suggest the solution .

Hi Sudhir, I think in XI there is 1:n relationship between Technical sysytem and business system.
Means for a technical system we can define a no. of business system , but only limitation is that for a Specific client we can define a single busines system with a logical system name.
so i am looking for any way around. for my scenerio is to add a another business system to the client which has already defined business system.
suggest if any alternative solution is there.
with thanks.

XI server: External XML to SAP interface: No own business system

Hi, we have inbound XML interfaces into SAP via XI using JMS queues. We have a dev, test and int. test environment. The dev and test environments work OK. The int. test environment has just been set up. The XML appears in the XI server, viewed via monitor SXI_MONITOR. It has a red flag error, within the XML trace, No own business system, seee below for full msg. I've test in config and the receiver is determined correctly. Can anyone help? Using XI version 3.0, SP14.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="CONFIG">LCR_ERROR</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1>No own business system</SAP:P1>
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText>No own business system</SAP:AdditionalText>
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack />
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>

hi,
have you tried executing TCODE - SLDCHECK
on your XI ?
if not check it and see it everything
is ok over there
if not check your busines system inside SLD
Regards,
michal

PO No range when we ink two SRM system with One ECC system

Hello Experts,
We have a client requirement to link Two SRM Systems with One ECC system.
In this case what number range we need to maintain in both SRM systems for PO.
-The number range of ECC PO should get update whenver the PO is transferred from any of the two SRM system.
-We have Extended classic scenario.
-Also PO Doc type is going to be same.
Can we handle this by increasing the buffer of the number range in one of the SRM system?
Any idea...pls help urgently.
Best Regards,
Anil
Edited by: anil.s.verma on Oct 1, 2010 4:33 PM

Hello Anil,
Being in Extended Classic Scenario (leading PO being in SRM, R/3 PO number range is concidered as external because PO number is given by SRM), the only solution for you is to:
1- give same number range interval for PO (internal in SRM system 1 and SRM system 2, external number range in R/3), e.g. 3100000000 - 3199999999
2- in SRM system 2, fill in current number with (for example) 3159999999 and let empty (or current value) in SRM system 1
3- assign, in each system for your concerned transaction type, number range as internal in SRM and external in R/3.
In this way, you will avoid overlaping in R/3 between PO numbers coming from SRM system 1 and SRM system 2
Regards.
Laurent.

Failure in retrieving business system with Idocs

We implemented a B2B scenario (SAP R/3 4.7 ->XI->XI->SAP R/3 4.7 ) in which each SAP R/3 + XI act as a Business Party with a business service assigned to internal business system.
Trying to send IDoc from one Business Party to the other
The IDoc got through from the source system to the target system OK, The target R/3 sent the ALEAUD ack back but the ALEAUD sent from the target R/3 contains the internal business systems names and the XI did
not convert it back to address the services that sent it from the source system.
The message gets to the source system with the internal names of the target system so it falls due to unrecognized systems.
the error at the source target for the returning ALEAUD is OUTBOUND_BINDING_NOT_FOUND
SAP dev support claim that the source is the header mapping from XI1 to XI2.
Any work around for this?
Thanks,
Udi

I have an idea.
call me : 0526116713
Nimrod

Can a Business service with party be conveted to a IDOC LSpartner profile?

Hey ,
I have a B2b scenario like this -> Http(external sender) -> XI - > Idoc in my SAP.
I have configured the external sender as service with party. I have configured that sender as a Logical system in my R3 system.
I am not able to make the the service with party map to the LS I have defined. I am able to the same with service without party (adapter specific attributes). This make me wonder if service with party can be mapped to a LS?
I have gone through most of the post in SDN but none answer this specific question.
regards,
Arvind R

thank you for the response -
I tried the approch u suggested and it works. But it messes up the Hop list for the IDOC Ack - ALEAUD sent back...
I dont think there is some way to change the Sender/receiver info for the std ALEAUD messages is there? I would like to avoid making the ALEAUD as independent messages and then route them...
Regards
Arvind R

Unable to create Business System with role Integration Server

hi Experts,
we are unable to create a BS with role of integration server, its throwing error with internal server 500.
please advise. we do not have any issues while creating TS with role of WEBASABAP.
thanks and regards,
Kesava
Edited by: Prateek Raj Srivastava on Jan 23, 2012 12:13 AM

Hi Kesava,
what is the purpose of creating a business system of type IS? This is automatically done in the post installation by CTC templates. So if the post installation is successfully executed, this should already be there. And if not you should check if the post installation was properly executed and if there where problems analyse why they occured.
The creation of the BS is just one part of the game, so I would highly recommend to execute the hole post configuration via template or follow the help.sap.com and execute it step by step manually in the described order. Otherwise i guess this will not work.
If there where just problems with SLD - please also have a look at SA Note 1117249 - Incomplete Registration of PI components in SLD
best regards,
Markus

SAP NetWeaver: SAP's Model-Driven Business Process Application?

Hi All:
I am a graduate student currently doing a research on 'Model-Driven Business Process Application'. I came across some literature about SAP NetWeaver during my research. SAP NetWeaver has generated a lot of interest in me and I would like to know more detailed information about it:
How is SAP adopting BPM principles to manage Work-flows? Can we consider any of the current NetWeaver applications as model-driven?
It would be great to know the answers to some of these questions. I would sincerely appreciate if anyone of you could please help me with this. Also, thank you very much for your time and efforts. I would be happy to assign reward points to any informative responses.
Regards,
Alok

Refer to this link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/6e/fb9442047b0831e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/5045b3cc-acbe-2910-2bab-8d930cb31a33
Regards, IA

Model Configurator - Business System not listed

Hello,
I have the following problem when using the model configurator to create a configuration scenario based on an integration scenario.
I want to assign a communication component to a product. However the according communication component is not listed in the value list for a specific product.
I have added the product to the business system (installed) in the SLD and also cleared the SLD cache. However the communication component is still not listed.
Any idea what else I could try?

Hi, I have the same issue. How did you make it show up in the value list? The input box on Model Configurator won't simply let you type it in.

SLD Business System with or with out Logical System If so, which Log system

Hi
I'm in confuse with the Logical System when creating a Business System in SLD.
Our requirement is LEGACY -- PI/XI -- ECC.
When I create Business sytem in SLD, I need to give a Logical System. Which system (Is it xi/pi or ECC ) Logical System to be provided?
Thanks.

>
Pothana Yadav wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm in confuse with the Logical System when creating a Business System in SLD.
> Our requirement is LEGACY -- PI/XI -- ECC.
>
> When I create Business sytem in SLD, I need to give a Logical System. Which system (Is it xi/pi or ECC ) Logical System to be provided?
>
> Thanks.
if you are using File to IDoc scenario then need to define logical systems for both business systems you are going to create for
i.e they will be used as sender and receiver partners in case of logical systems
if need more details check the below blog
/people/rajeshkumar.pasupula/blog/2009/03/16/unable-to-convert-the-sender-service-to-an-ale-logical-system
check the same for how logical system are used in this case...
note above will be helpful in case of only idoc scenario..else no need of creating logical systems even though target sysstem is ECC
HTH
Rajesh

Two operating systems with mountain lion

Is it possible to install two operating systems on a mac running OS X Mountain Lion?
I would like to setup Snow Leopard and keep Mountain Lion on seperate partitions.
Can this work?

As long as your Mac shipped with SL or less you can do it. You'll need to put SL on another drive or partition your existing hard drive. I prefer a seperate drive. Then when you need SL just boot from your SL drive.

SAP PI Modeling: Two Business systems with party

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for