Settlement Office Determination

Hello,
I am looking for information on the determination of the Settlement Office. I thought the settlement office is determined based on Transportation Planning Point. So what is the purpose of entering a Settlement Office in the Visit Plan Type configuration? Is it only to determine the Settlement Office during the final settlement run?
Thanks.

Hi
You can assign settlement profile to project profile where the WBS is existing.
PS->Cost->Automatic and period allocations->Settlement->Specify dafault settlement profile for project defination.
Regards
Laxmiprasad

Similar Messages

Settlement Office

Hello,
I am looking for information on the determination of the Settlement Office. I thought the settlement office is determined based on Transportation Planning Point. So what is the purpose of entering a Settlement Office in the Visit Plan Type configuration? Is it only to determine the Settlement Office during the final settlement run?
Thanks.

The solution for this approach is via ABAP effort. Please try LWBON001 userexit and also take the ABAP effort where exactly the Payer is being maintained in the program while creating Agreement. Try for a new field Sales organization in the Agreement overview screen. And also make sure to check where all this payer is getting touched in the prgrams. Try to debug the process by taking the developer help.
At this point I could think this much only. If any inputs I shall share.
suddu

Settlement rule determination in case of FXA

Hi Experts
My project is meant for settlement to asset.
W.r.t. Networks, the settlement rule can be automated using strategy as 'receiver is WBS'.
But, can we automate settlement rule determination except the specification of receiver for WBS?
Because, each WBS is to settled for individual sub asset
warm regards
ramSiva

Hi Virendra
In my case, the client is initially creates CWIP assets manually (Capital work in progress, nothing but the AUC, however it can be seen as fixed asset)
The CWIP assets can be more in number per project (one for each WBS or activity)
Until completion of project, the settlements are made to CWIP assets.
At completion, the transfer of all CWIP's to fixed asset is carried out in asset accounting.
So, the different assets are available initially, but need to be manually assigned.
Any standard program interface to upload based on the project strucxture?
warm regards
ramSiva

Production order settlement Account determination

Hi All,
When i run variances analysis settlement,in FI/MM account determnation what accounts should hit?
one side of the entry is hitting GBB-AUA and what is the off set to this account?
any help is appreciated.
Thanks,
Anusha

Hi,
In GBB > AUA, if the GL is maintained for COGM, then your variance GL would be in PRD > PRF which is right.
But in our case, We have maintained the GL for Variance in AUA and GL for COGM is maintained in AUF (of which the prerequisite is goods receipts for orders without account assignment and for order settlement if AUA is not maintained).
So settings in both of the systems are right.
Ultimately, while settling the PO, the entry would be as above thread.
Regards,
Jigar

Work Order Settlement Rule Determination

Hi Experts,
For T-code : IW32, can any one suggest any enhancements which triggers during following conditions:
1)While Releasing the Work order.
2)To redetemine settlement Rule i.e. I need to over wrtie a filed in Settlement rule i.e. "Setllement Reciever" with Cost center value.
3) Overwrite the default costcenter value in Location Tab with custom field value.
Thanks in advance,
With regards.

Hi Vani.
You must use either EXIT_SAPLCOIH_009 user exit or must configure workflow (STD object ISUSMORDER) .
Thanx
suresh.

Process order settlement account determination

Hi,
I have requirement for a particular plant to post the production variance to a different GL account than what has been setup in PRD - PRF OBYC setting. The valuation area grouping of this plant is also shared by other plants.
If i create a new valuation area grouping code for the plant then i have to do a lots of changes in OBYC so that all transaction keys referring to the old valuation grouping code is changed to the new one. It's not worth doing so because i want to change only a single GL account in PRD-PRF OBYC setting.
How can we get around this problem without having to create a new valuation area grouping code for that plant.

Hi,
You can use substitution for replacing GL Account (OBBH)
Br,Vivek

Automatic settlement to particular combination of cost centres and gl codes

HI,
A company uses Plant Maintenance for Engineering overhauls. MM is used for Engineering spares only (i.e. not for goods for resale etc).
The requirement is to set up ongoing Plant Maintenance Orders, one for each item of plant (only 600). The plan is just to leave them open, as they are only used at a simple level.
Anyway, for each PM order, the requirement will be to settle automatically, and to a particular GL code and a particular cost centre.
So, for three different works orders:-
Cost Centre -
> 333 334 335
GL code
1234----
>(X)
1235----
>(Y)
1236----
>(Z)
1) What is the best way to achieve this? I am thinking that GL code will be specified by order type (therefore I will need about 10, corresponding to the GL codes) and cost centre will be specified by Work Centre in each order.
2) How do I set up automatic settlement? Can this be at period end only or instantly when good are booked to the order by the stores.

Hi ,
For Plant Maintenance with FICO , you need Settlement rule & settlement profile.　
The settlement rule determines what portions of a sender's costs are to be settled to which receiver(s).
In thesettlement profile you determine to which objects orders of this order type can settle to. You can also assign an order type to a settlement profile at a later date. You can change the settlement profile in the order.
After you create the settlement profile , you need to save the profile to particular order type.
Inside the settlement profile , you will define the control parameter of how is the way to settle included which cost center to post.
For automatic settlement , i think you need user exist - Please refer to userexit IWO10027 or COOM0003 with your abaper.
Thank you.

How to exclude sales office for combination sales order type/division?

Hi experts,
I would appreciate if you could advise: How to exclude sales office for combination sales order type/division in ECC 6.0 ?

Hi
Standard SAP functionality would not be able to cater to this. Ideally create a Z table with sales order type and sales office combination. Put in entries for combinations that are allowed. In Sales order program MV45AFZZ use the exit USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_VBAK. In this exit write down the logic passing the sales office determined and the order type and check if the entry is there or not. If the entry is there then it should go on to the next step. If it does not then pass an error message. You need to use the help of your ABAP er for this.
Thanks
Indranil

How settlement rule will be created for Sales order with cost object

Dear Experts,
We are using product cost by sales order with valuated stock. In addition we are not using COPA
We also consume some materials at sales order level and at the end of month we want to do the result analysis and settlement for the same amount. In this case can any on explain how system will behave regarding settlement of sales order cost and what entries will get pass in the system.
In our case we have done below activities...
we have created sales order,
All production order activities completed till final GRN including month end activities
Material consumption against sales order
Result analysis executed
At the time of sales order settlement, system throwing error (Sender doesn't have valid receiver, please create settlement rule for sender object)
Then i checked in sales order there sales order settlement rule not defined.
I guess this settlement rule need be generated by system automatically. If not, please let me know the process of it.

HI kishore
the reason is that sale order always carry the revenue and production order and production period carry the cost .
cost you can settle to the Material and even management want to be settle the cost to material only in production order OR period
but in sales order when u sell the product it carry the revenue not the cost and management want see and analysis based on profitability segment are profit center level .
Prerequisites
If CO-PA is active, the system generates a settlement rule when you create the sales order. The settlement rule determines whether data is settled to other objects or other areas in Controlling. In accordance with this settlement rule, the relevant data is settled to CO-PA.
If CO-PA is not active, create a settlement rule. This settlement rule that you create manually normally contains a G/L account as a receiver (such as 399999). You can also settle costs and revenues or results analysis data to objects with revenue.
You can also settle the cost of sales calculated in results analysis to a fixed asset or a cost center. To do this, you must add to the allocation structure the results analysis cost elements under which the cost of sales is updated to the order.
The settlement rule includes a distribution rule for the sales order item. The distribution rule is made up of a settlement receiver, a settlement share, and a settlement type:
The settlement receiver (such as profitability segment or G/L account) specifies the object to which the actual costs and revenue of the sales order item are settled. The settlement receiver can be proposed through the settlement profile.
The settlement share defines the percentage or the equivalence numbers used to distribute the costs to the individual settlement receivers. The settlement share for sales order items is usually 100%. A settlement share of 100% is preset in the system.
The settlement type specifies full settlement of the sales order item. This ensures that all the data on the sales order is available for results analysis.
Settlement still takes place in each period. The revenues and the cost of sales are transferred to CO-PA by period, and the work in process and the reserves are transferred to FI.

Rebate settlement with $0 value

There are instances with a rebate agreement, that the business will decide they no longer require a rebate. The remaining balance would not be issued to the customer; but returned to the business. My user want to settle the rebate agreement by create credit memo with ZERO value. But sytem not allowing to create credit memo with ZERO value.
Kindly help me to address this issue and where is the control.

For this you can do simply delete a rebate agreement.
To do that, in the Change rebate agreement screen, enter the number of the rebate agreement that you want to settle or determine the number by using the matchcodes.
Press ENTER .
Select Agreement - Delete.
The system prompts you to confirm the deletion of the rebate agreement.
Press ENTER to delete the rebate agreement.
Result:
The rebate agreement receives status C (settlement created).
The system uses a credit memo request to remove the accruals created on the basis of the rebate agreement.
You can display the credit memo request for the rebate agreement via Payment - Rebate documents.
Regards
JP

Settlement rule for order

hi co guru sir....kindly guide me to maintain settlement rule for production order. steps by steps..plz..
problem is this when i create planned order to production order ..first screen open for maintain settlement rule...i have maintained..but may be wrong...
plz guide me for maintain the settlement rule........
thanx
regards
Aqueel

Hi,
Settlement rule determines which portion of the costs on a sender should be settled to which receiver(s).
You need to create a settlement rule to settle the actual costs of a sender object. The settlement rule contains the distribution rules for the sender.
Structure: The settlement rule contains:
- One or more distribution rules
- The settlement parameters for a sender object.
Creating a Settlement Rule:
You previously had to maintain the settlement rule for internal orders manually. Now the system can automatically generate settlement rules for internal orders.
Procedure:
1) Choose Settlement rule in the master data maintenance for the relevant sender object.
The Maintain Settlement Rules: Overview screen appears.
If you stored a default for account assignments in the settlement profile then the system displays the existing distribution rules. The settlement receiver is the object type you stored as an account assignment default in the settlement profile.
You maintain settlement rules in Customizing under Controlling -> Internal Orders -> Actual Postings -> Settlement -> Maintain Settlement Profiles.
2) Choose Edit -> New rule or enter the value directly.
Specify how the sender object costs are to be settled to the various settlement receivers:
- By percentage
- By equivalence numbers
For distribution rules of the same settlement type (periodic or total) you need to determine the portion using either percentage rates or equivalence numbers.
Specify the settlement type for each distribution rule.
The system defaults the settlement type depending on the receiver, for example PER for cost center, FUL for fixed asset. You can overwrite the default value, if required. When you save the sender object, you automatically save the settlement rule.
I hope it will help.
If helpful, please assign points.
Regards,
Manju

DSD Settlement Cockpit authorisation issue

Hello
We are using paper-based DSD. There are many TPPs mapped to several Settlement offices. Objective is to restrict a user to have a worklist consisting of shipments related to Transportation Planning Point that are assigned to his user-id via authorisation/roles. Currently, all users (irrespective of which state(BSO) he/she belongs to) get a worklist of all shipments.
Any ideas/suggestions on how we can implement such an authorisation?
Ujjwal

Hello,
After you Assign Allowed Settlement Types to Settlement Office in customising use Parameter ID /DSD/SL_BSO and assign it to user profile parameters.
Hope this helps.
Best,
Osnat

Installing Office 2004 on a network

Hi,
I have two computers connected through a cable router. I have Office 2004 installed on my computer and I had thought I had installed the same program on my son's G4. I never had a problem using Word while he was also using it on his computer. He recently got a G5 and I installed again the Office 2004 on his computer. Now when I attempt to load my Office 2004 program, specifically Word, while he is also using it on his computer, I get a message that two computers on the same network are not allowed to use Office 2004, i.e. that only one computer at a time can use the program. Is there a way around this? Should I just unplug my ethernet cable when I want to use the program at the same time he is using his?
Thank you.

Hello Sae,
Welcome to the Apple Forums!
Sounds like it may be a licencing issue. Microsoft does update various components of Office for Mac, so there may have been an update that's affected the way Office determines whether it's properly licenced.
Have you confirmed that you are "licenced" to run it on more than one machine? Have you seen mention in the licencing agreement anything to do with the number of allowed installations?
Reason for asking is that maybe it is only licenced for one machine. In that case, you can't "get around it" without violating terms of the licencing agreement (legally a bad thing).
At any rate, let me know what you find!
Regards,
Motosuwa

PM:Action log for Settlement rule

Dear all,
May i know are there any way that i can see the changes that being done at screen maintain settlement rule. For example if I change the settlement type, system will keep the change/action log for that changes.
One more question, what the different between settlement type 'FUL' and 'PER' (impact to the settlement)
thank you so much,
Siti Norbaida

Hi,
I Hope this Documentation will help you ........
Settlement type
Depending on the processing type, the settlement type determines which settlement rule is used in a particular type of settlement processing.
The SAP system supports four settlement types. The AUC and PRE settlement types are used for settlement of capital investment measures. You can only use the PER settlement type for planned settlement.
PER (periodic settlement):
Settlement with this settlement type covers only the costs for the relevant settlement period.
The following data from internal cost allocations:
Sender cost center/activity type sent
Business process
Quantities
is allocated further to the following receivers:
Cost center
Internal order
Sales order
WBS element
Cost object
Business process
Actual activity prices, elimination of internal business volume and variances can then be calculated correctly in Cost Center Accounting and Activity-Based Accounting;
FUL (full settlement):
You can use this settlement type in automatic settlements.
The difference to periodic settlement is that in full settlement you settle each time all the costs that have occurred for a sender object for all the periods prior to the settlement (and are not yet settled). If PER rules exist, they take precedence over the FUL rule.
Quantities from internal activity allocations are not sent to the receiver. This means that there is no guarantee that actual activity prices, elimination of internal business volume, and variance calculation will take place correctly. For this reason, we do not recommend that you use FUL for cost centers or business processes.
AuC (Capitalization in asset under construction):
This settlement is automatically generated if you enter a capital investment profile with an AuC as its capital investment measure in the order control data.
Settlement is conducted periodically and in full to the AuC
PRE (periodic preliminary settlement):
You can enter PRE rules in the settlement rule for the order. They are used as part of settling capital investment measures. Depending on the rules you entered, posted debits are settled to the CO receivers or to a G/L account before the periodic settlement.
It is good idea to do this for particular line items if there are additional costs assigned to a capital investment measure that should not be capitalized. This may be necessary, should you wish to monitor the total costs of the measure in controlling.
Use
Note that settlement type FUL permits quantity settlement for primary cost elements only. You cannot settle quantities to assets.
Note that you cannot manually create or change a distribution rule with settlement type AUC. This has the following effect on settlement rule maintenance:
The required rule is generated from the asset under construction, which is stored in the master data for a capital investment measure, ( order or WBS element)when you carry out settlement for the first time.
Regards,
Gangadhar

Why internal order settlement is require

why internal order settlement is require
and in internal orders acctual cost is plan cost is 100 and acctual is 150
then which amount we have to settle in internal order
regards
venkatareddy

Hey Venky,
An internal order is usually used as an interim collector of costs and an aid to the planning, monitoring, and controlling processes needed. When the job has been completed, you settle the costs to one or more receivers (cost center, fixed asset, profitability segment, and so on).
During settlement, some or all of the plan or actual costs incurred on an object are allocated to one or more receivers. The system automatically generates offsetting entries to credit the sender object. The debit postings assigned once to a sender object remain in place, even after settlement to a receiver (and can therefore be displayed). The costs settled are updated on the corresponding receiver object and displayed in reporting.
To be able to settle an order, you must have saved a settlement rule in each of the senders. This settlement rule determines where the costs are to be settled to. You can achieve this in two ways:
Settlement to One Receiver:You use this basic form of order settlement to completely settle the costs collected on the internal order. This is either to a cost center, or a G/L account under a settlement cost element. The system generates the appropriate settlement rule from the information contained in the internal order master data.
Comprehensive Settlement:Definition of a comprehensive settlement rule gives you more settlement possibilities, for example, you can:Settle costs to a wide range of receivers (project, sales order, profitability segment, and so on).
Specify how the costs are to be distributed between receivers.
Define the cost elements under which the sender is to be credited and the receivers debited.
Constraints:You can only use one of these settlement methods at a time: For example, if you defined settlement to one cost center in the master data for an internal order, then you can only define a more comprehensive settlement rule once you have deleted the first rule.
Hope this helps. Requesting to reward points please.
Rgds
manish

Settlement Office Determination

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for