Settlement to different business area cost objects

Dear all
In my requirement We are carrying the work at one Business area on behalf of another business area. The maintenance order has some expenses amount,after completion of the job i need to settle into another business areas cost objects. But sap is giving the error only. Is ot possible?

The below error is getting while settling orders into another Business area cost objects.
There are no accrued amounts; settlement is not possible.
Message no. KD256
Diagnosis
The sender has a results analysis key, but no accrued values.
Either the accrual was not yet started for the sender, or the values to be settled from the accrual equal zero.
Note
Actual costs are only settled once the sender is technically completed or finally delivered.
This applies to
o     Projects that cannot carry revenues
u2022     In Service Management for sales order production to the indicator (Calculate WIP for orders in sales order production) set in the accrual version for
o     Production orders
o     Internal orders with no revenues
o     Orders with no revenues
u2022     In Service Management for engineer-to-order production to the indicator (Calculate WIP for orders in engineer-to-order production ) set in the accrual version for
o     Internal orders with no revenues
o     Orders with no revenues
u2022     In Service Management to the indicator (Calculate WIP for internal and service orders with no revenues) set in the accrual version for
o     Internal orders with no revenues
o     Orders with no revenues
u2022     To the indicator (Calculate WIP for production orders without settlement to material) set in the accrual version for
o     Production orders without settlement to material
Procedure
1. If necessary, start the accrual calculation for the sender
2. Restart settlement

Similar Messages

Order Settlement to another B area cost objects

Dear all
In my requirement We are carrying the work at one Business area on behalf of another business area. The maintenance order has some expenses amount,after completion of the job i need to settle into another business areas cost objects. But sap is giving the error only. Is ot possible?

Thenna,
Message to all: you really should get an OSS logon - its free and would save us all a lot of time...
However, this looks like a FICO issue... and here is the OSS Note text:
During settlement error message KD256 is output
"There are no accrued amounts; settlement is not possible".
The error message and the long text do not supply sufficient information on the causes for the error message.
Additional key words
CJ88, CJ8G, VA88, KO88, KO8G, CO88
Cause and prerequisites
Preconditions for message KD256 are:
1. The sender carries a results analysis key
and
2. it is
a) a sender with revenue
or
b) a production order with FUL rule to product which in the settlement period has neither the status DLV nor the status TECO
or
c) a WBS element which does not have the status TECO
or
d) an order, which in the settlement period has neither the status DLV nor the status TECO, and the indicator 'WIP on dependent orders' is in the results analysis version.
In these cases, only data from accrual calculation is settled. In the cases b) to d), no actual costs are settled to the receiver of the settlement rule.
The error message is now output
1. if no accrual calculation has been carried out,
or
2. the accrued data have already been settled
or
3. the flag 'Settlement to FI' has not been set in any of the results analysis versions
or
4. no posting rules have been defined for any of the results analysis categories.
Solution
1. Check for the cases b), c) and d) whether the sender already had the status GLV or TECO in the settlement period, that is, whether the delivery date or the date of the technical closure is prior to the posting date of the settlement. If this is not the case, the system continues to determine and settle in period WIP.
Note: Prior to Release 4.0, the system did not update the date of the technical closure with WBS elements. This is why the date of the technical closure was not checked in Release 3.0/3.1. This was an error in Release 3.0/3.1.
2. Check the settings in the Customizing of accrual calculation, that is, check the flags 'Settlement to FI' in the results analysis version and check the posting rules.
3. Check the previous settlements for the sender. For this use the function 'Extras -> Previous settlements' on the initial screen of the settlement.
4. If necessary, start accrual calculation for the sender again and start the settlement again afterwards.

Document Splitting with Different Business Area

HI
I have a situation, where i need to create a new document type and it needs to be configured in such a way that vendor invoices and credit notes can be booked with the correct doc splitting and using different Business Areas.
I like to know if this is possible, and if yes how.
Earlier the client used to post the transactions, with different business areas, as we get only a warning message to reset the business area of the vendor.
Now that we have activated New G/L accounting, with document splitting we get the warning message,
but then the profit center will not balance, so we have an error.
The client requires that they need to post to a different business area, and the document splitting should happen.
Any suggestions on this will be great.

Hi Srikanth,
In my config setting under Document Splitting i have the Zero Balance ticked for it.
My Scenario is as an Ex. I am debiting a G/L account for 1000, and giving Business Area X, with a cost Center which is assigned to Business Area X.
And Crediting a Vendor for 1000 with Business Area Y.
Will this scenario work with Document Splitting enabled, i am doubtful on this, but my client needs this.
Can you tell me if this is a possible scnerio.
If yes then how?

Same folders in different business areas

Hi,
Is it possible to access folders across business areas?
I was not able to do the above so I created (New folder from database) the same folder into 2 different business areas. But I cannot have the same names. Why? I see some folders created previously with the same names in both the business areas. Is there some other way?
Thanks in advance.

Hello everyone
Business area names, folder names, and join names are unique across the system. It is possible to have the same folder in multiple business areas and this is not uncommon. It is also possible to reference the same object using multiple folders, making sure the identifier and folder names are unique.
If you have a folder that you want to duplicate, rather than share between business areas, you can highlight the folder in one area, copy it using CTRL-C, and the using CTRL-V paste it into the other area. Doing this gives you a copy of the folder pointing at the same underlying object. This is useful if you want to reference the same object several times, say for aliasing purposes or for ease of querying. I do this all the time when working with fiscal time folders and it works like a dream.
Hope this helps
Regards
Michael

GR/IR Automatic Clearing for Different Business areas items

Hello All,
we have different business areas, and some times we create a PO for all business areas and invoice it in a specific business area
in F.13 automatic clearing:
for GR/IR account
Documents with different business area cannot be cleared.
any idea to solve this issue is appreciated,

Thanks for your reply,
I've tried such a solution with more parameters ( EBELN, XREF3 and EBELP)
but in F.13 :
- the document cannot be cleared when >>> selecting GR/IR account special process.
if we treat GR account as a normal GL account, I mean without selecting GR/IR account special process.
the document can be clear
i want to be able to clear the document with selecting GR/IR field ( is it possible )
and if it is not allowed, do we will face a problem by clearing GR account without selecting GR/IR parameter ??
Many Thanks

Different Business Area in Customer line item while Billing

Dear Friends,
We are on Ecc 6.0 and We have a requirement of Different Business Area in Customer line while billing. Since we had defined Business area location wise and requirement is Sundry Debtors should always book to Location as maintained in delivery plant field of sales area data in customer master.
Requirement:- Our material is assigned to Plant 115.In customer master, sales area data -> shipping tab -> Delivery Plant (KNVV- VWERKS), we are maintaining "112", Now while billing and while generating Accounting document account entry is
Customer 1000.00 (Business area=115)
sales 1000.00 (Business area=115)
But our requirement while accounting document after billing is
Customer 1000.00 (Business area=112), system should check and derive the same from TABLE KNVV - VWERKS(DEL PLANT)
sales 1000.00 (Business area=115).
Please revert.
Regards,
Sandeep

Dear Friends,
One can do the same via using a userexit.
Regards,
Sandeep

Proper use of one table in different business areas

Hi
We will be using certain DB tables in several business areas and we are more than one person to define them.
If a table is loaded from the database for each of the business areas it will be numbered 'table 1, 2...' which does't seem very desirable. Also I'd rather define hiearchies only once and for all.
If a table is loaded only once and used for all the business areas all the joins which are necessary in the different business areas are shown. This will be confusing. If one of us considers a certain join unnecessary he might accidentially delete the wrong one belonging to a different business area.
Exporting the business areas including the joins regularly is probably not a great help if afterwards new joins for other business areas were added.(?)
Am I misunderstanding the concept of Discoverer?
How do you handle such a situation?
Advice appreciated
Franziska

Hi Michael, et al,
I'm just planning my EUL and your comments in the last post seem relevant.
My general plan is as follows:
(1) Create a BaseMaster BA which is used to bring and tables/views from the database into disco. The folders in here will be created with "New Folder from database" and be fairly straightforward, with only very simple calculations and no aggregations in calculations. The joins will echo the joins in the underlying database. This is not shared with Users.
(2) Create a CustomMaster BA which contains Custom Folders which consist of various SQL views of the database. The SQL in these may use have some more complex calculations and these calculations may include aggregation. This will not be shared with users.
(3) Create a CentralMaster BA which contains Complex Folders which are assembled from items from the BaseMaster BA and the CustomMaster BA. These folders may include more complex calculations and the calculations may include aggregated items.
(4) Create a number of User BA's. Using Manage Folders, share the relevant Folders from the Central Master.
I've got a few questions relating to this.
(a) Custom Folders based on Folders
It would seem nice to me if it were possible to create Custom Folders which were based on other Folders, rather than Database Views. Then, even if you need a view and a complex transformation of that view in your business area, you still only have one place where the EUL brings that view into disco. My understanding is that this is not possible. Am I right? I suppose there could be an argument that complex transformations should be pushed back to the DBA but it seems reasonable to me that sometimes this sort of thing could be within the remit of the disco admin?
(b) SQL Efficiency
Am I right in thinking that generally a complex folder is usually not much less efficient than using a base folder because the SQL interpreter ends up optimising the SQL?
And a last question which has turned out rather complex - by all means ignore it if you like - it's me getting to grips with the process.
(c) Nested Complex Folders
I presume that if a transformation is needed which would in a normal database environment would need a mainquery and a subquery, then this could be done in a
number of ways (adhering to the above methodology) by:
(i) Get the DBA to write a view which does both mainquery and subquery and then bring into the BaseMaster and then straight into the CentralMaster folder.
(ii) Get the DBA to write the subquery, bring this into the BaseMaster and then implement the mainquery in the CentralMaster.
(iii) Create a Folder in CustomMaster which implements both mainquery and subquery and then bring this into the CentralMaster folder.
(iv) Create a Folder in the CustomMaster which implements just the subquery and then implement the main query in the Central Master.
If you've got this far - thankyou for baring with me.
Perhaps there's something written about this sort of thing or maybe it's just a matter of practice!
Any thoughts on all this would be much appreciated.
Kind regards
Suhada

Business area-cost centre relation

Hi,
Guide me relation between business area-cost centre, bus area-material, bus area-plant-division and bus area - sales area,plant.
Regards,
DH

Hi,
Follow the Link, I think it may help you
[http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPFI/BuldingBlocks(Masterdata)ReleventtoControlling]

Number range based on different business area for same document type

Hi All,
The scenario is my client wants to give the different number range for a particular document type based on different business area.
Is there any user exit by which I can restrict the same.
Regards,
Meenakshi

Hello,
Document number ranges are created per company code and fiscal year. You cannot create / restrict the document number ranges per business area.
Business areas a independent of all organizational values, they cut across all company codes.
Regards,
Ravi

Validation require for different business area in MRO

Dear friends
System is allowing posting of different business area in Miro (Line item & Header item).For disallowing I have checked Validation, I think it is not usable.Please suggest me another solution.
regds
sachin

Hello,
You can use MRM_HEADER_CHECK bAdI for this validation.
or
You can use Enhancement (CMOD transaction) LMR1M001 -EXIT_SAPLMRMP_010 for this validation
Regards,
Burak

Business Area-Cost Center error while doing VL09 (PGI Reversal)

Hi Friends,
Kindly go through the "ERROR" message and "IMPORTANT" point as mentioned below:This is happening while reversal of PGI in VL09.
IMPORTANT: Just to make you aware, the cost center in error (CONSDSPL) was nowhere assigned in FS00 or OKB9. Also to state that at the time of this error some different cost center was assigned in FS00 which was having business area SUGR. So PGIs are picking up two business areas i.e. 1.DSPL (from Plant-Division-BussA setting) & 2. SUGR (for P&L GL from FS00)
Following error coming while doing PGI reversal:
ERROR -
> BAL1/CONSDSPL CTR belong to business area DSPL not SUGR
Message no. KI188
Diagnosis
Account assignment object BAL1/CONSDSPL, type CTR is assigned to business area DSPL. You made an explicit assignment to business area SUGR.
System Response
The posting row may contain only one business area.
Procedure
Perform one of the following actions.
Make an explicit assignment to business area DSPL. To do so you must set the "Business area" field as entry-ready in Customizing.
Enter an account assignment object assigned to business area SUGR.
Change the assignment of BAL1/CONSDSPL to business area DSPL. Note the document number and continue processing the document after changing the assignment.
PLEASE GUIDE. NEEDED ANSWER BADLY.

Business area filed in cost center CONSDSPL is DSPL (what it should be). In this scenario, they have assigned SGPRODCTN cost center in GL master wherein business area is SUGR.
That means, when accounting entry is getting generated, it will show two business areas. One will be fetched from "Plant-Division-BussA" setting (SPRO) & the other from GL. Also to make you aware that here the business area should be DSPL, but since they assigned wrong cost center in GL master, the entries are going to SUGR as well.
Most important thing to notice out here is that when this error came "no default account assignment was done through OKB9" The cost center showing in error viz. CONSDSPL was nowhere assigned. So the question is from where the system is fetching this cost center?

Intra company / different business area service jobs flow

Dear all
The business process is below
The Machinary plant which is providing the repair/services to its parent plant. All the incoming materils from parents plant will be non valuated for repairing thro notification. After receipt of the services ,machinary plant will create the service order. All the costs will be booked. The serviced materail is despatched to the parent plant with out inventory account. While services all the materails, activities are performed in machinary plant account.
The service order which has expenses costs it should settle into the parents company cost center, order. But this one has separate business area.
For above this shall we follow the process as _Maintenance Notification (by parent plant)---Non valuated materail reciept( at service plant) -- Material or equipment master creation -- service Notification creation - Service order creation & process Settlement into parents cost center.*-- Despatch of service Product---Receipt with out Purchase order-.*_
Here i am not understanding how the parent plant will get the maintenance cost of the equipments since of non valuable material.
For above process any one explain please

Hi,
The TCodes for the Transfers are as follows:
ABUMN: For intra-company or Inter-plant transfers
ABT1N- For Inter-company transfers.
If you have only 1 company code,then there is no need of using the TCode ABT1N, You can use ABUMN.
Regarding the excise invoices,you can post the same once billing is done,by using TCode:J1IIN,but of course it will depend at which point your client would do the excise invoice.
Hope this is useful.

Business Area - Cost Center - Urgent

Hi,
I have encountered a problem with business area wise document splitting. I have selected business area wise document splitting after posting values in the cost centers. now I need to assign business area in the cost center master data. Because of the cost center is having values, it is not allowing me to assign business area in the master data. Now i want assign business area in the cost center master.
And in Cost Center Master Data the Business Area Feild is mandatory field, thats why it is not allowing me to change the period and to create a new cost center with the same CC No.
Pls help me out in this regard
Thanks in Adance
Raveendra

Hi,
try to run the following ABAP: RKACOR06 It allows you to change the business area in the cost centre master.
Hope that helps, points welcome
Csaba

Relation Between Company code Business Area,Cost centre etc

Hi Experts,
Can anybody tell me How the following are related to each other the same is mentioned below.
1.Company Code
2.Business Area
3.Profit Centre
4.Cost Centre
5.Cost elements
AR

Hi,
Follow the Link, I think it may help you
[http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPFI/BuldingBlocks(Masterdata)ReleventtoControlling]

Asset (Machine) Transfer with in Company code (Different Business area)

Dear all
Please provide us transaction code and document flow for inter plant transfer of assets t. All required entry of MM, PM, FI and excise should be covered in the document process. Inter u2013plant & inter-company assets transfer/sale is common in our Clinet and it needs to be streamlined by defining standard process.
And please note that asset or any other material can only be cleared from one place to another by preparing excise invoice. It is also advised that FI entry must be posted before removal of goods from the plant.
Please give complete procedure and transaction . Please suggest

Hi,
The TCodes for the Transfers are as follows:
ABUMN: For intra-company or Inter-plant transfers
ABT1N- For Inter-company transfers.
If you have only 1 company code,then there is no need of using the TCode ABT1N, You can use ABUMN.
Regarding the excise invoices,you can post the same once billing is done,by using TCode:J1IIN,but of course it will depend at which point your client would do the excise invoice.
Hope this is useful.

Settlement to different business area cost objects

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for