Standard Cost Estimation Functionality removal from S.O.

Hi Friends,
I would like to know, is in SAP system there is an option to remove funcionality of auto Stadard cost Estimation i.e. we don't like to make Standard cost Estimation at the time of Sales order creation.
Can you Please tell me about this feature.
Rgds, Krishan Raheja.

Hi,
I am talking about the Cost Estimation happens, as it shows the cost via menu path---> Extra --> Costing. Further, the system will make the accounting entries for consumptions/Receipt w.r.t. to cost calculated vai this estimation. VPRS condition is not having the same prices as calculated in Costing. Further, the stock will also remain with same prices as calculated in price.
Can you please suggest, if there is any option, so that we can omit this costing calculation and system make consumption/receipt entries with the values in material master.
Rgds / Krishan Raheja.

Similar Messages

The split (i.e., 70% & 30%)during standard cost estimation (CK11)

Dear All,
A component(Y) in the BOM of X is manufactured in house (70%) & procured directly from vendor (30%).
Can we have the split (i.e., 70% & 30%)during standard cost estimation (CK11)
Based on the cost we deside to make or buy.
Please explain the procedural steps in arriving at this solution.
Regards,
Kumar

Dear Mr.Kumar,
For any material in the material master , for Price
Control indicator in Accounting 1 View we can either
maintain S or V.
For In House Manufactured materials we maintain S
(Standard price) & for Sub contracted or bought out
items we maintain V(Moving Average price).
During cost roll up & release as far I know we cant
split like 70 & 30% and we can do the costing.
So either you have to use the moving average price for
both inhouse & bought out.
Because 1 material cant have both standard price &
Moving Average price.
Because bought out item's doesnot have standard price.
If your vendor is ready to give the material(Finished
product) using the same amount which you spend for
producing inhouse,then no issue,you can use
standard price.But Practically it doesn't occur.
I hope this will help to clear your doubt.
If useful reward points.
Regards
Mangal
Message was edited by:
Mangalraj

Standard cost estimation after goods movement when material ledger is activ

Hi!
our client is activated material ledger, for some materials standard cost estimation is done till marking but not released.
goods movements have been posted for those materials.
Now system is not allowing to release the standar price for those material in the current period, as material ledger expects same price for entrie period.
what is the alternative way to update the standard price for those materials ( with out reversing the goods movements).
regs,
ramesh

Hi Ramesh,
When you are using Material Ledger, after goods movemnets for materials, no need to change the standard cost estimate as Actual costing run will take care to derive the PUP price.
If there is no standard cost estimation release for sold materials (e.g.FG), you will get an error message duirng the billing document release to accounting. To aviod this error, if you are using split valuation (valuation types) and mixing ratios (CK91N & CK94), try with the below steps:
Create a new valuation type for the same material
Crate CK11N & CK94,
Run CK11N
Run CK24.
Then release the billing document.
Let me know if you need more details.
Thanks & Regards,
ADI

Routing during Standard Cost Estimation

Dear all,
We are executing the Standard Costing using t_code CK11N for a finished product,,,for the same we have maintained BOM, but no routing has been created,,
so, during execution of Standard Costing system is prompting a msg: No routing could be determined for material AUBF0018 (green indicator not an error msg), so if we try save the costing a success msg: "The cost estimate is being save" is being prompted,, but the standard cost did not get updated in material master.
what would be the cause? Is routing essential prior to standard cost execution,,, as our Client says that without routing also they could excute/update the standard cost earlier,,, why this problem is occuring? is there any thing need to be defined in customization for routing not to consider during standard cost estimation,
Please help us in this regard,
thanks
Kumar

Dear Urendra,
1.After executing the costing run with quantity structure in CK11N and saving the datas,it only saves the cost estimate.
2.Marking and release should be done using CK24.First the same has to be marked and then using the same T Code you have to
release it,only after this steps it get's updated in the material master.
3.In your case you have done only CK11N and not CK24.
4.Moreover the routing get's picked automatically by the costing variant that you use,in your case even though there is no
routing,the systems throws the message before saving,but the status will be saved with errors.
Check with this and revert back.
Regards
Mangalraj.S

Difference in the Material variant BOM Qty during Standard Cost estimation

Hi SAP Experts,
We are trying to estimate the cost for the material variant, but the BOM exploded
during the cost estimation, the quantity differs slightly with the BOM exploded
during CU50.
What might be the reasons for difference.
Please give your valuable Inputs.
Thanks
Best Regards
Siva

Dear Mr.Kumar,
For any material in the material master , for Price
Control indicator in Accounting 1 View we can either
maintain S or V.
For In House Manufactured materials we maintain S
(Standard price) & for Sub contracted or bought out
items we maintain V(Moving Average price).
During cost roll up & release as far I know we cant
split like 70 & 30% and we can do the costing.
So either you have to use the moving average price for
both inhouse & bought out.
Because 1 material cant have both standard price &
Moving Average price.
Because bought out item's doesnot have standard price.
If your vendor is ready to give the material(Finished
product) using the same amount which you spend for
producing inhouse,then no issue,you can use
standard price.But Practically it doesn't occur.
I hope this will help to clear your doubt.
If useful reward points.
Regards
Mangal
Message was edited by:
Mangalraj

Difference in the BOM Qty during Standard Cost estimation

Hi SAP Experts,
We are trying to estimate the cost for the material variant, but the BOM exploded during the cost estimation, the quantity differs slightly with the BOM exploded during CU50.
What might be the reasons for difference.
Please give your valuable Inputs.
Thanks
Best Regards
Siva

Dear Mr.Kumar,
For any material in the material master , for Price
Control indicator in Accounting 1 View we can either
maintain S or V.
For In House Manufactured materials we maintain S
(Standard price) & for Sub contracted or bought out
items we maintain V(Moving Average price).
During cost roll up & release as far I know we cant
split like 70 & 30% and we can do the costing.
So either you have to use the moving average price for
both inhouse & bought out.
Because 1 material cant have both standard price &
Moving Average price.
Because bought out item's doesnot have standard price.
If your vendor is ready to give the material(Finished
product) using the same amount which you spend for
producing inhouse,then no issue,you can use
standard price.But Practically it doesn't occur.
I hope this will help to clear your doubt.
If useful reward points.
Regards
Mangal
Message was edited by:
Mangalraj

Standard cost estimation along with departmental transfer

Hi Friends,
I will like to have the overview of the
1. departmental transfer price.
2. CKM3N (i.e. material price analysis, what is the difference between activation and non activation of it.)
3. KB21N (Direct activity allocation)
What are their connection in estimating the standard price.

Hi Friend
1) Transfer prices
Transfer price is a price used to valuate the transfer of goods and service between profits centers. Precondition is that you have Material Ledger active
Legal View = Company Code
                                             Parallel Valuation Approach
                                            /                       |                     \
                                    Group                Legal               Profit Center
- If currency type 32, transfer price is active
- Internal moves are always valued at procurement price
2) CKM3N
Before you activate Material Ledger you would have the option of S or V Price control, however when you activate ML you   can value Materials at "periodic unit price", this price takes into account all the transactions of a material in a period(i.e goods movements, procurement etc..) and then at the end of the period revaluates the Material with a new periodic unit price.
3) KB21N
Allocation in general means taking cost accumulated on one object and allocating it to another, usually a cost center.
Direct Activity Allocation is where you use transactions KB21 (KB21N) to manually allocation costs from the cost collector (e.g. Order) to a specific Cost Center. The activities can come from PS or from CATS Activity Recording. These activities are assigned to an order/wbs/network. And from there via the transaction KB21/KB21N they are allocated to a specific cost center.
I hope the above information helps.
Regards,
Declan

[CS5.1] Javascript functionality removed from Applescript?

I haven't been able to find any answers with this.. and starting to feel like i'm the only one with the problem. I just finally upgraded from CS2 - thankfully not a whole lot has changed and i've found solutions for converting most of my code, but this one i'm stuck on.
The do javascript command is clearly listed in the library as valid, so when i compile it's recognized and all, it's just that whenever executed Photoshop gives an error saying, General Photoshop Error occured. This functionality may not be available in this version of Photoshop.
Help..? They didn't really get rid of it, did they?

Yes that is the thread that I meant… If you've tried what is suggested there then I don't know any more… I had switched scripting language before this change… How much JavaScript is there, can you put it in an inline string? Does this simple example work for you…
tell application "Adobe Photoshop CS2"
     tell document 1
        set docName to name
        set docMode to mode as string
          do javascript "alert( arguments[0]+' is '+arguments[1] )" with arguments {docName, docMode}
     end tell
end tell

Why was the "I'm Feeling Lucky" functionality removed from the Firefox awesomebar in all releases after version 3.6?

In Firefox 3.6, when I type something specific, like "wikipedia steve jobs" into the url bar, I am taken directly to Wikipedia's page for Steve Jobs, and if I type something less specific, I am taken to a Google search results page for what I typed in the bar (unless it was a URL, obviously); in the current version of Firefox, though, I am taken to a Google search results page for whatever I type in (again, not a URL, obviously), even if the page I am seeking is obvious-- how can I avoid this extra step and regain the Firefox 3.6 "I'm Feeling Lucky" functionality?

There is a change beginning in Firefox 4 and later versions in how Location bar search works.
* In Firefox 3.6.x, Location bar search uses Google "Browse by name" search. With the browse by name search, it performs a Google search and if there is a clear match it will take you to the site otherwise it shows the Google search result page
* In Firefox 4 and newer versions the default is to perform a Google search and present the Google search results page if you type something which is not recognized as a URL you must type a complete URL, such as www.youtube.com to go directly to the site.
To get the Firefox 3.6.x behavior in Firefox 4 and newer versions, you can either change a hidden preference OR install the add-on below.
-> To change the preference, type '''about:config''' in the Location (address) bar and press the "Enter" key. When you see a warning, click '''I'll be careful, I promise!''' button.
* In the '''Filter bar''', type '''keyword.URL'''
* Right click the preference '''keyword.URL''' and click '''Modify'''
* A small window will appear. Copy one of the URLs below and Paste into the box in that small window (or type it into the box in that window exactly as shown below):
* Google "I'm Feeling Lucky" -> http://www.google.com/search?btnI=I%27m+Feeling+Lucky&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=
* Google "Browse by Name" -> http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&sourceid=navclient&gfns=1&q=
* Close the '''about:config''' tab and then Restart Firefox.
-> OR install this extension:
* Browse By Name 1.1
* https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/browse-by-name
Check and tell if its working.
References:
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/About:config
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Keyword.URL
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Location_Bar_search
Taken from:
* https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/questions/876502

Edit function removed from SE16N transaction, reports and interface FM

I give it 3 years before work programs are updated...

I think the whole story is too long to fit into a 2500 character post..
The function should have the strictest check which the system has to offer. Which is 01 DEBUG. But in this case checking the object name is not possible, so 02 DEBUG is needed for that in the SE16N include where the function is activated. However, someone debugging another program could submit the SE16N FM from there as well, so you must at least be able to display in the debugger to get anywhere near it in the first place.
So it checks all three.
It also means that if the person does not have the authority and wants to use a dark trick to assign authorizations, they will need to go looking for SAP_ALL or possibly a multiple of authorizations to assign to pass all three checks. That is more "noisy", which is also good for finding people with fat fingers.
> why was it not limiited to CO-tables?
It does check S_TABU_DIS...?
AFAIK the popularity of the transaction (much more than just this edit feature) caught SAP by surprise and by the time it's use had exceeded imaginable boundaries... there was little chance of retro-fitting functional restrictions or a component downport to "SAP_BASIS". So authority-checks it was...
Note that the code field of SE16 is still there, as it has been since ancient times.
Cheers,
Julius

Standard Cost Estimation

Dear All,
Yesterday we taken the costing run for all 5 plants, in this 5 plants we have problem with 3rd plant.
During costing result the price is Rs. 69 Rs.
However it is release with Rs. 2.8 only in Material master
Previous price in Material Master is Rs. 12,500/-
But in Material master shown Rs. 500/-.
So, Any one could you guide me how can i solve this problem.....
Thanks for Advance....
Thanks & Regards,
Chandrababu.B

Dear Adi,
Exactly your right.....,
The Costing Lot Size = 25 in Material Master
Before Marking = 69.97
After Release = 2.80
Here the calculation is 69.97/25 = 2.80
As per your suggestion i checked it.....
Thanks a lot Adi....
Thanks & Regards,
Chandrababu.B

Std. Cost estimation

Hi all,
How do we maintain standard cost estimation for the material master?
Its very urgent
i will assign the points
venu

HI ashish,
Thanks for your information. already i given material number but system not entering price automatically.
from where system picks the price?
Itz very urgent
Once again thanks for your cooperation
I will assign the points
Thanks in advance
venu

Error message "Product Recovery Function" removed

Greetings
Hi all........I am in a big trouble at this moment.I have installed OS XP which i am having from university. I am trying to reinstall my original Winxp using Rescue & Recovery 3.0. I repaired my MBR using MBR repair diskette and installed RnR 3.0. After that when i pressed F11 key it enters in rescue and recovery but when i click to bring my laptop to original factory state it gives me an error "Product Recovery Function removed from the system". I am service partition is still intact with the hard disk. It would be really helpful if someone can share his knowledge and experience.
thanking in advance
yogesh

Hi,
The recovery DVDs from Lenovo should get you going.
Are you trying to shrink the C: partition from within Windows? It's probably the page or hibernation file that is the problem. If you want to keep trying while waiting for the DVDs you could try an off-line partitioning tool. gParted on a Linux live CD or USB flash drive for instance.
There is some cloning software that can do a shrink during the clone op - Acronis for instance.
Z.
The large print: please read the Community Participation Rules before posting. Include as much information as possible: model, machine type, operating system, and a descriptive subject line. Do not include personal information: serial number, telephone number, email address, etc. The fine print: I do not work for, nor do I speak for Lenovo. Unsolicited private messages will be ignored. ... GeezBlog
English Community Deutsche Community Comunidad en Español Русскоязычное Сообщество

Table for Valuation Price from USER EXIT - Cost Estimation

Hi All,
Can you let us know from where the system picks the price for VALUATION PRICE from USER EXIT when we have following setting in valuation variant
1.Valuation Price from USER EXIT
2.Price from Purchasing Info Records
3. Planned Price 1
Sub Stratergy.
1.Effective Price from Purchase Order
2. Net Quotation Price
3. Gross Quotation Price.
Now when we execute CK11N for a material, the system displays a cost price as 316 Euro/ unit.
But Standard price is 290 euros, info record price is 294 euros & planned price 304 euros.
Our previous cost estimation ( period 1, current period is 5) was 316 euro/unit (which was not correct), so deleted the cost estimation with CKR1 and try to rerun the cost estimation to update the value (new price), but still the system is picking the old price.
Can you let us know from where does(transaction code & table) the system is picking the old values.
In CK11N Material valuation (Valuation tab) its showing as Valuation Price from USER EXIT.
We have activated Material Ledger with price control "s"and we in ECC 6.0.
Do suggest.

Hi,
Where & how can i find the exit.
Do suggest.
Regards,

How to create Quotation from Ad hoc cost estimation of cProjects?

Hi Guruu2019s
Please help me in resolving the issue given below. I am able to get ad hoc cost estimation results in accounting screen, but not able to create a Quotation from Ad hoc cost estimation of cProjects.
I am here with providing necessary steps to be followed. But these buttons are not available in my accounting screen.
Prerequisites
A reference quotation has been linked to the project under Structure  Object Links. An ad hoc cost estimate has been created for the project.
Procedure
1.     Choose the Accounting tab.
2.     Choose link Ad Hoc Cost Estimate.
3.     Enter client, user and password to log on to SAP ECC.
The client, user and password must be entered if Single Sign On is not activated
4.     On the Ad Hoc Cost Estimate screen, choose .
5.     On the Easy Cost Planning screen, choose .
6.     Choose .
7.     Choose Yes when you are prompted with u201CDo you really want to create the quotation?u201D
8.     Write down the Quotation number :_______________
9.     Choose .
Result
Quotation in SAP ERP has been created.
Please respond to this at the earliest. Points are given for your reply. I would be great if any one provides step by step procedure for IMG activities. Thanks in advance.
Thanks & Regards
Suresh. J

Hi Suresh,
maybe you find the following link also useful:
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_ppm400/helpdata/en/index.htm]
Navigation: Collaboration Projects -> Accounting Integration -> Preliminary Costing and Quotation Creation -> Ad Hoc Cost Estimate for cProjects or Sales Pricing for cProjects
From the page:
The cost planning function is executed by Easy Cost Planning (ECP). The cost estimate is always created at project level and is always single-level. The organizational data relevant to costing (controlling area, company code, and master cost center for the derivation of the activity type under which the allocation is reported) is derived from the HR organizational unit specified in the project definition. The costs are calculated based on the rates for the resource, project role, or task. For more information, see Costing Logic.
The revenues are calculated automatically if you have selected the option Use Cost/Revenue Rates from cProjects or Use Sales Pricing in SAP ERP as the revenue calculation type for the project type that you are using for the project. You make this selection in Customizing for Collaboration Projects, by choosing Connection to External Systems -> Accounting Integration -> Make General Settings. With the last option, the revenues are calculated with the dynamic item processor (DIP). For more information, see Sales Pricing for cProjects. Then you can also call up sales pricing from within the ad hoc cost estimate.
You can archive the ad hoc cost estimate in SAP ECC (archiving object CO_ECP) if the project has the status To Be Archived.
Technically, the ad hoc cost estimate is saved in SAP ECC with reference to the cProjects project number. When the project is transferred, it is recosted and the cost estimate stored for the account assignment object.
Hoping this helps...
Best regards,
Thomas

Standard Cost Estimation Functionality removal from S.O.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for