Standard cost estimation along with departmental transfer

Hi Friends,
I will like to have the overview of the
1. departmental transfer price.
2. CKM3N (i.e. material price analysis, what is the difference between activation and non activation of it.)
3. KB21N (Direct activity allocation)
What are their connection in estimating the standard price.

Hi Friend
1) Transfer prices
Transfer price is a price used to valuate the transfer of goods and service between profits centers. Precondition is that you have Material Ledger active
Legal View = Company Code
                                             Parallel  Valuation Approach
                                            /                       |                     \
                                    Group                Legal               Profit Center
-  If currency type 32, transfer price is active
-  Internal moves are always valued at procurement price
2) CKM3N
  Before you activate Material Ledger you would have the option of S or V Price control, however when you activate ML  you   can value Materials at "periodic unit price", this price takes into account all the transactions of a material in a period(i.e goods movements, procurement etc..) and then at the end of the period revaluates the Material with a new periodic unit price.
3) KB21N
Allocation in general means taking cost accumulated on one object and allocating it to another, usually a cost center.
Direct Activity Allocation is where you use transactions KB21 (KB21N) to manually allocation costs from the cost collector (e.g. Order) to a specific Cost Center. The activities can come from PS or from CATS Activity Recording. These activities are assigned to an order/wbs/network. And from there via the transaction KB21/KB21N they are allocated to a specific cost center.
I hope the above information helps.
Regards,
Declan

Similar Messages

  • Standard cost estimation after goods movement when material ledger is activ

    Hi!
    our client is activated material ledger, for some materials standard cost estimation is done till marking but not released.
    goods movements have been posted for those materials.
    Now system is not allowing to release the standar price for those material in the current period, as material ledger expects same price for entrie period.
    what is the alternative way to update the standard price for those materials ( with out reversing the goods movements).
    regs,
    ramesh

    Hi Ramesh,
    When you are using Material Ledger, after goods movemnets for materials, no need to change the standard cost estimate as Actual costing run will take care to derive the PUP price.
    If there is no standard cost estimation release for sold materials (e.g.FG), you will get an error message duirng the billing document release to accounting. To aviod this error, if you are using split valuation (valuation types) and mixing ratios (CK91N & CK94), try with the below steps:
    Create a new valuation type for the same material
    Crate CK11N & CK94,
    Run CK11N
    Run CK24.
    Then release the billing document.
    Let me know if you need more details.
    Thanks & Regards,
    ADI

  • Standard Cost Estimation Functionality removal from S.O.

    Hi Friends,
    I would like to know, is in SAP system there is an option to remove funcionality of auto Stadard cost Estimation i.e. we don't like to make Standard cost Estimation at the time of Sales order creation.
    Can you Please tell me about this feature.
    Rgds, Krishan Raheja.

    Hi,
    I am talking about the Cost Estimation happens, as it shows the cost via menu path---> Extra --> Costing. Further, the system will make the accounting entries for consumptions/Receipt w.r.t. to cost calculated vai this estimation. VPRS condition is not having the same prices as calculated in Costing. Further, the stock will also remain with same prices as calculated in price.
    Can you please suggest, if there is any option, so that we can omit this costing calculation and system make consumption/receipt entries with the values in material master.
    Rgds / Krishan Raheja.

  • Routing during Standard Cost Estimation

    Dear all,
    We are executing the Standard Costing using t_code CK11N for a finished product,,,for the same we have maintained BOM, but no routing has been created,,
    so, during execution of Standard Costing system is prompting a msg: No routing could be determined for material AUBF0018 (green indicator not an error msg), so if we try save the costing a success msg: "The cost estimate is being save" is being prompted,, but the standard cost did not get updated in material master.
    what would be the cause? Is routing essential prior to standard cost execution,,, as our Client says that without routing also they could excute/update the standard cost earlier,,, why this problem is occuring? is there any thing need to be defined in customization for routing not to consider during standard cost estimation,
    Please help us in this regard,
    thanks
    Kumar

    Dear Urendra,
    1.After executing the costing run with quantity structure in CK11N and saving the datas,it only saves the cost estimate.
    2.Marking and release should be done using CK24.First the same has to be marked and then using the same T Code you have to
    release it,only after this steps it get's updated in the material master.
    3.In your case you have done only CK11N and not CK24.
    4.Moreover the routing get's picked automatically by the costing variant that you use,in your case even though there is no
    routing,the systems throws the message before saving,but the status will be saved with errors.
    Check with this and revert back.
    Regards
    Mangalraj.S

  • The split (i.e., 70% & 30%)during standard cost estimation (CK11)

    Dear All,
    A component(Y) in the BOM of X is manufactured in house (70%) & procured directly from vendor (30%).
    Can we have the split (i.e., 70% & 30%)during standard cost estimation (CK11)
    Based on the cost we deside to make or buy.
    Please explain the procedural steps in arriving at this solution.
    Regards,
    Kumar

    Dear Mr.Kumar,
    <b>For any material in the material master , for Price
    Control indicator in Accounting 1 View we can either
    maintain S or V.</b>
    <i>For In House Manufactured materials we maintain S
    (Standard price) & for Sub contracted or bought out
    items we maintain V(Moving Average price).</i>
    <b>During cost roll up & release as far I know we cant
    split like 70 & 30% and we can do the costing.</b>
    So either you have to use the moving average price for
    both inhouse & bought out.
    <b>Because 1 material cant have both standard price &
    Moving Average price.
    Because bought out item's doesnot have standard price.</b>
    If your vendor is ready to give the material(Finished
    product) using the same amount which you spend for
    producing inhouse,then no issue,you can use
    standard price.But Practically it doesn't occur.
    I hope this will help to clear your doubt.
    <b>If useful reward points.</b>
    Regards
    Mangal
    Message was edited by:
            Mangalraj

  • Difference in the Material variant  BOM Qty during Standard Cost estimation

    Hi SAP Experts,
    We are trying to estimate the cost for the material variant, but the BOM exploded
    during the cost estimation, the quantity differs slightly with the BOM exploded
    during CU50.
    What might be the reasons for difference.
    Please give your valuable Inputs.
    Thanks
    Best Regards
    Siva

    Dear Mr.Kumar,
    <b>For any material in the material master , for Price
    Control indicator in Accounting 1 View we can either
    maintain S or V.</b>
    <i>For In House Manufactured materials we maintain S
    (Standard price) & for Sub contracted or bought out
    items we maintain V(Moving Average price).</i>
    <b>During cost roll up & release as far I know we cant
    split like 70 & 30% and we can do the costing.</b>
    So either you have to use the moving average price for
    both inhouse & bought out.
    <b>Because 1 material cant have both standard price &
    Moving Average price.
    Because bought out item's doesnot have standard price.</b>
    If your vendor is ready to give the material(Finished
    product) using the same amount which you spend for
    producing inhouse,then no issue,you can use
    standard price.But Practically it doesn't occur.
    I hope this will help to clear your doubt.
    <b>If useful reward points.</b>
    Regards
    Mangal
    Message was edited by:
            Mangalraj

  • Difference in the BOM Qty during Standard Cost estimation

    Hi SAP Experts,
    We are trying to estimate the cost for the material variant, but the BOM exploded during the cost estimation, the quantity differs slightly with the BOM exploded during CU50.
    What might be the reasons for difference.
    Please give your valuable Inputs.
    Thanks
    Best Regards
    Siva

    Dear Mr.Kumar,
    <b>For any material in the material master , for Price
    Control indicator in Accounting 1 View we can either
    maintain S or V.</b>
    <i>For In House Manufactured materials we maintain S
    (Standard price) & for Sub contracted or bought out
    items we maintain V(Moving Average price).</i>
    <b>During cost roll up & release as far I know we cant
    split like 70 & 30% and we can do the costing.</b>
    So either you have to use the moving average price for
    both inhouse & bought out.
    <b>Because 1 material cant have both standard price &
    Moving Average price.
    Because bought out item's doesnot have standard price.</b>
    If your vendor is ready to give the material(Finished
    product) using the same amount which you spend for
    producing inhouse,then no issue,you can use
    standard price.But Practically it doesn't occur.
    I hope this will help to clear your doubt.
    <b>If useful reward points.</b>
    Regards
    Mangal
    Message was edited by:
            Mangalraj

  • Configuring Cost Code along with Payroll elements in Timekeeper time entry

    Hi,
    I am trying to configure cost code as a separate entry along with payroll elements in timekeeper time entry screen.
    Can any one help me in completing the task.
    Regards
    BK

    I have configured the time keeper time entry scree of my own.

  • SAP allows release of Standard Cost for Material with Moving Average Price

    Hi
    We set our Raw Material to use Moving Average Price (V) and price determination 2 (single level). And we activated material ledger.
    During mass calculation of standard cost (CK40N), If user accidentally forgot to restrict the Raw Material for being included in calculation, the system calculate standard cost anyway, even though I set it as Moving Average Price. And user is able to release it too without any problem.
    Why the system does not restrict it? By giving error maybe. Although as for now I can not find the wrong effect from releasing standard cost for MAP material, by your experience, is there any side effect that I should be aware of?
    Thanks

    CK40n is mass release of all materials. The release is not dependent on price indicator of the material in the master. It will calculate standard cost of all the materials.
    Releasing standard cost estimate of raw materials does not have any side effect as long your calculation is based on moving average price.
    Regards
    Divraj

  • Standard Cost Estimation

    Dear All,
    Yesterday we taken the costing run for all 5 plants, in this 5 plants we have problem with 3rd plant.
    During costing result the price is Rs. 69 Rs.
    However it is release with Rs. 2.8 only in Material master
    Previous price in Material Master is  Rs. 12,500/-
    But in Material master shown Rs. 500/-.
    So, Any one could you guide me how can i solve this problem.....
    Thanks for Advance....
    Thanks & Regards,
    Chandrababu.B

    Dear Adi,
    Exactly your right.....,
    The Costing Lot Size = 25 in Material  Master
    Before Marking  = 69.97
    After Release  = 2.80
    Here the calculation is  69.97/25 = 2.80
    As per your  suggestion  i checked it.....
    Thanks a lot Adi....
    Thanks & Regards,
    Chandrababu.B

  • Increase in capital along with partial transfer

    Hi, I have a scenarios as below which has both increase in capital and partial transfer..
    Scenario as below:
    Hierarchy as on April 2010:
    u2026.9099
    u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026..9010
    u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026..9020
    u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026.9030
    u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026.9040
    u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026.9050
    9099 is holding 100% in 9050 as on April 2010. in May 2010 the following changes are happened.
    9099 increases its capital on 9050 for an amount of USD 100,000.
    Also 9020 injecting capital of USD 6,000 for 2.5% share in 9050
    And 9040 injecting capital of USD 75,000 for 32% share in 9500
    After the above changes holdings in 9050 are as below on May 2010
    9099 is holding 63.5% in 9050
    9020 is holding 2.5% in 9050
    9040 is holding 32% in 9050.
    Pls advice me the steps invlolved in this scenario.
    Regards,
    Richard

    Hi Dan,
    Currently the issue is resolved. But it is just correct at Main group level, but still sub group level, i made some manual postings.
    Now I have given to user for testing, surely i will write if in case I have any issues.
    Thanks a lot for supporting me in all the times.
    Regards,
    Richard

  • Actual Cost of Product with Price control "S"

    Dear Gurus,
    Is there any report available where we can know the Actual Costs of Materials with Price Control "S".
    In the material master field the actual cost in the "Moving Price Tab" of the material with Price Control "S" is available, but is there any report available for plant level?
    Thanks & Regards,
    Amit Dhanurdhari.

    Hi Amit,
    -- Under Standard Costing, you value your inventory at Standard Costs and any variances in Production Process will be settled to Price Difference Account. You will not be able to find out actual cost per unit. In Multi-level BOM scenario under Standard Costing (CO-PC), variances don't get rolled-up to the next level, only costs get rolled-up.
    -- Under Actual Costing - Material Ledger, You will be able to find out the Actual Cost per Unit. Variances get rolled-up to the next level.
    To explain difference between Standard Costing in CO-PC and Material Ledger briefly....
    You have given Price Indicator as "S" in the material master of "X" material (semi finisher or finished) and you are doing Standard Cost Estimate for arriving at Standard Cost per tonne. Let's say, the Standard Cost per tonne is Rs.1000/-
    Now, when you created production order for 10 tonnes and received output of 10 tonnes (GR). But the total cost incurred on that production order is Rs.1100/-. In this situation, actual cost per tonne is Rs.110.
    But, because you are following Standard Costing, When you post GR against this Production Order, inventory will be posted at Standard cost only, i.e., Rs.1000/-. and the balance of Rs.100 will be posted to Price Difference Account. (and parallally the variance of Rs.100/-) will flow to COPA.
    So, it is clear that, though, at Production Order level you can see the actual cost, at "material" level, you will not be able to see the actual cost per tonne.(as long as you are using only Product Costing and Standard Costing)
    Alternatively, if you maintain Price Indicator as "V", you will able to get the Actual Cost per tonne at material level, but there will be no scope for establishing standard cost and comparison with actual thereof.
    But, the same is possible if you are using Material Ledger (CO-ML). If Material Ledger is active, you will be maintaining "S" in the material master, still, the variances will be settled inventory and you will be able to get the actual cost per tonne. (bothe Standard cost estimate, actual cost per tonne will be possible).
    Pls revert back for further explanation
    Srikanth Munnaluri

  • Std. Cost estimation

    Hi all,
    How do we maintain standard cost estimation for the material master?
    Its very urgent
    i will assign the points
    venu

    HI ashish,
    Thanks for your information. already i given material number but system not entering price automatically.
    from where system picks the price?
    Itz very urgent
    Once again thanks for your cooperation
    I will assign the points
    Thanks in advance
    venu

  • Populating our log message along with standard sap log in ck11n.

    Hi all,
    I have developed a user exit which is used in costing of material using ck11n.
    Here i have to show our custom log message along with the standard log shown by standard sap system after costing run is complete.
    I got one FM-- CM_F_MESSAGE  which is used by SAP. But i want the message along with SAP messages and not separately.
    Can u help me out for this. its very urgent.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi
    I'm not sure because I don't know that trx, but I seem the function group of that function manages a log, so you can try.
    This is an extract of abap code of SAPLCKDI where that fm is used:
    CALL FUNCTION 'CM_F_MESSAGE'
       EXPORTING
         ARBGB = Y_CMF-CK
         MSGNR = '327'
         MSGTY = Y_CMF-W
         MSGV1 = SICHT
         MSGV2 = KLVAR.
    So I suppose you should call it by this way:
    CALL FUNCTION 'CM_F_MESSAGE'
       EXPORTING
         ARBGB = <your message class>
         MSGNR = <message number>
         MSGTY = <message type>
         MSGV1 = <text 1>
         MSGV2 = <text 2>
         MSGV3 = <text 3>
    I think MSGV* is optional parameter.
    Max

  • CO-PA Cost Component do not match with Standard Cost Component Values

    Dear Members,
    The CO-PA Cost Components (as mapped through KE4R), do not match with Standard Cost Component values for the Group Currency. In local currency the values match.
    System is correctly picking up VPRS value, both in local currency and Group Currency, which is equal to the total of Standard Cost Components however, it is the Value Fields linked to the Standard Cost Components in Group Currency that do not match.
    In KE40, the Indicator is 4:Released Standard Cost Estimate matching Goods issue Date.
    I have verified KEPH/CKMLPKEPH tables. The values are same as that of VPRS.
    Any help/clues?
    Regards
    Satya

    Hi,
    In case of billing documents the group valuation approach is managed in the data structures of the legal valuation in additional value fields. To control costs and revenues in the different views separately, you must create additional value fields and assign them to the data structures.
    The field contents must be filled via the CO-PA user exit, they cannot be entered by assigning conditions to value fields. The profit center valuation is updated in a separate ledger. No separate value fields are necessary.
    The exit to be used is function module 'EXIT_SAPLKEII_002' ( enhancement COPA0005 ). Within the exit you have the complete SD data avaialble in the tables 'T_ACCIT' and 'T_ACCCR'. The conditions can be found in T_ACCIT and the corresponding values ( linked via 'POSNR' ) in table T_ACCCR. The PA line item and the corresponding SD item in table ACCIT
    can be mapped via the line item field 'RPOSN' and the field 'POSNR_SD' in table ACCIT.
    regards
    Waman

Maybe you are looking for