Too many partitions in my W530?

This may look like a silly question and I fully admit that it might be it... But I have been unable to find a way to get rid of some apparently unuseful partitions in my SSD. I am attaching two images (see below) for clarity.
In image 1, I can see only two partitions, C: and Q: and there are also listed three other "Devices with Removable Storage": the DVD RW drive (D: ), the Removable Disk (F: ) and the Removable Disk (G: ). I tried to get rid of these last two (F: and G: ) but could not figure out how to achieve it. Not that their presence is a problem, just for cleaning purposes, as I do not see any need for them to be listed there. I don't even fathom what they may actually represent.
In image 2, taken from the Acronis True Image backup app, besides the same C: and Q: partitions, I also see a System_drv and an unamed partition that are not listed in the Windows-7 figure. The Unamed Partition, by the way, is always empty but I was discouraged in the past to just get rid of it. I wonder if I should, having received conflicting advice on whether or not to do it.
My question is: How can I eliminate the Removable Disks F: and G: as shown in the Windows figure and would it be a good idea to get rid of the Unamed partition as shown in the Acronis figure.
All help will be very much appreciated.
Thanks.
Link to image 1
Link to image 2
Moderator note: images totalling more than 50k converted to links per forum rules:  Lenovo Community Participation Rules

If you were to install Win7 from scratch on a brand new empty drive (spinner or SSD, doesn't matter) and not change anything from the standard default installation options, you'd get TWO partitions:
(1) un-lettered "system reserved" 100MB, where Boot Manager (and boot menu, presented if you were to install a second or subsequent bootable OS after installing Win7 as the first bootable OS) is placed.  This is also marked as the ACTIVE partition, so that the BIOS goes here to start the actual boot process.
(2) C-partition for the rest of the drive.  This is where Windows itself gets installed, as a "system" drive.
In the case of Lenovo-provided machines, they have installed additional recovery tools, which are placed into that small un-lettered partition normally referred to as "system reserved" and only 100MB.  Lenovo has enlarged the partition from the standard 100MB to about 1.5GB, but it's functionally identical in purpose.  Also, it's been labeled "SYSTEM_DRV", rather than "System Reserved", but this is of no relevance.
And Lenovo's also added that additional Q-partition, which is where the "data" for system recovery is placed, in the event you needed to or wanted to restore your machine to initial factory state, exactly as it looked when it first came out of the box.
So... what's critical here is that standard Windows7 requires the TWO partitions: (1) ACTIVE partition, where Boot Manager and boot menu lives and where the BIOS goes to start the boot process on what is configured as the first hard drive in the boot sequence, and (2) C-partition because that is specified as the one-and-only bootable OS partition according to the default one-OS boot menu built by the Win7 installer and subsequently examined by Boot Manager at boot time.  Since by default there is only one bootable OS you will not be presented with the boot menu, but instead Boot Manager will simply use that one-and-only OS and start it.  If you had two or more bootable OS's, you'd get a boot list presented onscreen by Boot Manager, and you'd need to select which one to boot from within say 10 seconds else the default OS would automatically be booted.
Any "system image" backup requires BOTH of the above partitions to be checked, since [at least theoretically] BOTH of them need to be backed up and/or restored in tandem should you need to recover from a disaster.  By backing and restoring BOTH, you guarantee a 100% working operating environment should you need to recover from a disaster.
Now the Q partition can be deleted (and its space re-allocated to either expand C, or perhaps in conjunction with shrinking the generally much too large C can be used to allocate one or more additional "data" partitions D, E, etc.) if you will NEVER need to or want to recover back to Lenovo's "factory-provided" out-of-the-box system setup.  This could be the case if you use an alternative method for disaster recovery, such as using Macrium Reflect to take regular periodic (say once a week) "system image" backups, say to an external USB 3.0 drive.
So you could use Macrium Reflect to take an initial "system image" backup, which would effectively be your equivalent of the Lenovo-provided Q partition content, although you wouldn't need Q if you had to restore the Macrium "system image" backup.  And then you'd just establish a weekly regime of further "system image" backups using Macrium, as your ongoing regular protection from a loss of Windows integrity which required some kind of restore to a prior working system.  In this case it would be no older than last week's backup.
If you needed more current protection, just take more frequent "system image" backups (if you only have a C partition), or add a second backup tool like NovaBACKUP to take monthly/daily "data" backups (also to the external USB 3.0 drive).
==> You don't have "too many partitions".  But the above description explains why you have what you have, and confirms that you can blow away Q if you have an alternative and superior backup/recovery method (such as Macrium Reflect) in case of a disaster.

Similar Messages

  • E Table of aggregate has too many partitions

    Hi,
    While checking performance info of the query I'm getting red light on one of the lines saying aggregate 100067 has too many partitions in E table.
    Could you guys pls let me know what is this all about and how to reslove the same?
    Thanks
    R

    Does your cube have compress after rollup on the aggregates...?
    The aggregate is partitioned in the same way the E fact table is partitioned. You should choose the compress upon rollup option in the rollup tab of the infocube... Set the same and then if possible deactivate and do another rollup to the aggregate...

  • Aggregates having too many partitions

    I have come across a situation where the aggregrates has too many partitions and I cant correct this with RSRV checks.
    This is the error message in RSRV.
    "E table of aggregate 100157 has too many partitions"
    There are many errors of this kind. How can I resolve this issue.
    Appreciate your help..

    <b>Some Insights-</b>
    Take some time to go through it..
    Numerous questions on this note made it necessary to talk a bit about E tables here as well since E facttables may also be partitioned. But they are only allowed to be partitioned by the time characteristics 0FISCPER and 0CALMONTH and only once they are activated. Any attempts to switch on partitioning after the activation has taken place and the cube has data (regardless whether in F or E table) is not supported at all. You have to do that by creating a second cube, partition that one and then load it from the first via an export datasource.
    or
    RE-PARTITIONING is the soln
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/b9/60c041a2236a24e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
    The final tool for these E table partition related question will be delivered with the next release of BW as part of Netweaver 2004s. There will be a repartitioning tool allowing you to dynamically (well, you still shouldn't do this every day;-) change the partitioning range of a cube. And it will allow you to switch cubes to be partitioned which were unpartitiond before without going through the reload scenario that is necessary in BW 3.X (where X = 0, 1 or 5).
    Since that tool is based on major rewrites of existing as well as creation of new functionality, it can not be downported to BW 3.X
    Note 590370 - Too many uncompressed request
    Hope it Helps
    Chetan
    @CP...

  • V570 - Has too many partitions - Can I nuke one? I need a separate Data Partition!

    Hi,
    I convinced a Buddy to buy a V570 two days ago. (I've used a Lenovo Laptop for work for a year, and it's been rock solid.) The box was delivered to his house a few hours ago. He lit it up and put his name on it, and then brought it to me, as I help his family out with their computers. (Our Wives are best friends.) I'm a bit geeky and usually know my way around these boxes. But I'm a little stumped on this one.
    Normally on laptops they come with tons of bloatware, and it's usually faster to go up to the OEM's site, download all the latest drivers and  utilities, then back up the original image before blowing it away, and installing a fresh Windows OS. One of the other main issues is most lappys have one big partition for the OS and Data. So if you get a Trojan or virus => it can nuke all of it. So I always divide the drive, and have a Data partition, so you don't lose everything if (when) something nasty occurs. 
     But in this case the Box really doesn't have too much bloatware, so I thought make the Factory backup disks, then uninstall the few unwanted programs, partition the C Drive, and create a Data drive in that space. I didn't even look at the hidden partitions so when I went to Create the Data partition I was warned Windows 7 64 Pro doesn't support more than 4 partitions on the operating system drive! If I go into Disk Management I see the typical small Win7 recovery 200 MB partition, a 654 GB C  partition, a empty (?) 29 Gig Lenovo partition, and a 14.75 OEM partition. I'm used to the first 2 partitions but what's the rational for the last two from lenovo? One is the "factory" image, and I assume it's the OEM partition, so what's the Lenovo partition for? Can I shrink C, and enlarge the Lenovo partition, so it can become the Data Drive =>  without affecting the lenovo drives function?
    I thought I may have to go with the new Windows install but I can find all the drivers /utilities software at the Lenovo Sites. So I'm a bit stumped and would appreciate your help.
    Thanks for the assist.
    Regards,
    -Jim-

    Jim,
         In one word, no.
         I would strongly advise you to just leave it alone, unless you want to spend hours on the phone to your friend, trying to fix all the problems your friend will encounter, with his "new" modded system.
         Please, I'm not trying to be nasty, or unkind. Those 4 partitions are the key to Lenovo's One Key Recovery. Lenovo has spent a lot of time, and engineering to make their systems as user friendly, and trouble free as possible. They built in the Enhanced Experience 2.0, and customized the Windows 7 software for fast booting. Just because you "can"  repartition the drive, doesn't mean you "should".
         These forums are filled with users who messed around with their drive structure, used a modded BIOS, or just plain screwed up their programs and hardware, just because they "could". Then they want some urgent help for their machines that went wacky. The moderators on these sites have a hard enough job, keeping track of the various systems "as shipped", to do any troubleshooting on those systems that the user has repositioned the drive, or deleted the programs that Lenovo has included for recovery.
         As you've said, there's not a lot of bloatware on Lenovo's machines. You shouldn't have to reload a "fresh Window OS". If you do, some of the Lenovo's Enhanced Experience 2.0 for Win 7, and some other functions will be toast. That's why you don't see all of the Windows drivers on their site. Lenovo only includes the drivers that have been modified for your V570. Stick with them.
         So, in the end, yeah you can mess with the partitions, but you shouldn't. See this thread to know what you are getting in to, and be ready for your friend's late night phone calls.
    http://forum.lenovo.com/t5/IdeaPad-Y-U-V-and-Z-series/new-disk-partioning-and-one-key-recover-featur...
    DragonRider
    I'm DO'ing IT
    Lenovo Y470 085525U 2nd generation Intel® Core™ i7-2630QM processor ( 2.00GHz 1333MHz 6MB )
    IdeaCentre A520 Intel® Core™ i5-3230M processor ( 2.60GHz 2600MHz 3MB )
    YOGA Tablet 2 Pro-1380F
    X1 Carbon 2nd Gen (20A8) ThinkPad + T420

  • Too many partitions

    I have a connected firewire disc with five partitions, and all of them mount at startup even though I am only using one of them to boot. Is there a way to prevent some of these partitions from mounting at startup. I vaguely remember that an old version of disc utility had this feature, but I can't find it now.
    Perhaps something might be done with Terminal? All the unused partitions kind of clutter the finder windows.
    iMac   Mac OS X (10.2.x)  

    I looked into this once and found it was quite difficult to do.
    I ended up writing this applescript:
    do shell script "diskutil unmount \"/Volumes/VolumeName\""
    ...saving it as an application, and then making it a login item. Both my drives would mount at login, but after 20 seconds or so the unwanted one would be automatically unmounted.
    If it's only desktop clutter that's bothering you, there's a Finder preference to hide volume icons from the Desktop.

  • Dual boot Win 7 & win 10 HP Envy laptop - get 'too many partitions'

    moved to Notebook and Laptop forum

    That is exactly what I am saying. The mSSD is not directly bootable. You have to put a bootloader configuration on the main 1 TB drive so it starts booting there and then hands to boot chores over to the mSSD. The mSSD slot in that laptop series is designed to hold a much smaller "acceleration" mSSD which works with the main hard drive. 

  • How to fix: Too many Primary Partitions ? G770

    Hello,
    I am trying to install PuppyLinuxSlacko.5.4 from a LiveUsb to a unallocated-Partition in my Lenovo-G770 Laptop, Win7 . 
    My G770 shows that I have two disks: C:\  and  D:\ .
    But the Using (Linux) GParted program shows there are 4-Primary Partitions already (see pic GParted01.png below) . 
    http://www.vmars316.com/ShowMe/GParted01.png
    And when I try to Format the Unallocated Partition, I get an Error Msg (GParted02.png below) .  
    http://www.vmars316.com/ShowMe/GParted02.png 
    Pls, How to fix: Too many Primary Partitions ? 
    Thanks...vmars316...Vernon

    * Questions added to original Post: 
    I am trying to install PuppyLinuxSlacko.5.4 from a LiveUsb to an unallocated-Partition in my Lenovo-G770 Laptop, Win7 .
    My G770 shows that I have two disks: C:\ and D:\ .
    But the Using (Linux) GParted program shows there are 4-Primary Partitions already (see pic GParted01.png below) .
    http://www.vmars316.com/ShowMe/GParted01.png
    And when I try to Format the Unallocated Partition, I get an Error Msg (GParted02.png below) .
    http://www.vmars316.com/ShowMe/GParted02.png
    Pls, How to fix: Too many Primary Partitions ?
    I've been told that to try and fix it in Linux is too risky .
    I set up the unallocated 20gb partition.
    Can I just merge it into the 29gb Extended Partition ?
    If I did merge, How would I access it ? Which Partition is it an extension of ?
    I am on thin ice here, and would rather fix the prob in Window7 , because I am brand new to Linux .
    Here is the PartitionsDetail using AomeiPartitionAssistant -note the differences:
    http://www.vmars316.com/ShowMe/AoemiPartitionWindows.png
    Is there a way to tell what's in the partitions , especially the two 29gb partitions and the 14gb partition ?
    Worst case: Is there a way to reset my 'Lenovo G770' computer back to factory settings under win7 ? 
    I think I'll add this Post to the Win7 Forum, since I hope to fix it via Win7 .
    Thanks...vmars316...Vernon

  • Recover/install Win7 onto multi-boot system - too many primary partitions?

    I have a few questions:  (first a background question, and then I'll get to the heart of the issue)
    First, on a new laptop with factory installed Win7, I see there are 3 primary partitions - a 1.5GB "MBR-0", a ~10GB recovery partition, and the main installation partition.  What is the 1.5GB one for, and what's on it?  An MBR certainly doesn't need 1.5GB.  Does Win7 create that, or is that something unique for Toshiba?
    If I'm using a 3rd party boot-manager (BootitNG via an EMBR on its own partition), can I just wipe that 1.5GB partition?   And, can the recovery installation be set up to create the Toshiba-Win7 recovery partition (and that 1.5GB one) as extended volumes within the Win7 primary partition, and not to make them as its own new primary partition?
    And now to the main problem:  (the gist of it is, how many partitions will the Win7 recovery disks create? and can I customize it?)
    I have a new toshiba c650 laptop that came with Win7 installed.  I created the one-time recovery DVDs first thing (it made 4 of them - Disk 1,2,3, and "64-bit environment").
    I then wanted to set up a multi-boot system between Win7, and 2 instances of XP (one of which is a fresh install, the other being an image backup off a computer that died). I want each OS on its own primary partition, where each only sees/knows of itself.  Also, I'll have one small, 50MB primary partition for the boot-manager program.
    Of course, a drive can only have 4 primary partitions (if working with standard tools like fdisk, etc).  To get around that (if needed), my boot-manager program will support as many primary partitions as I want, provided I use only it alone to manage/create my partitions.
    Skipping the details, here's what I have now:  I wiped the hard drive, except for that 1.5GB MBR-0 partitition, for now, till I find what it is.  (Since XP doesn't recognize Win7, using XP's install cd would overwrite the factory Win7 installation, so I installed XP first on its own primary partition - and it's working fine).  I have the boot manager program on a second primary partition.  I then created 2 more primary partitions - one to place the XP-drive-image into, and one to install Win7.  So, the entire drive is now fully utilized and partitioned.
    But here's the problem...
    starting with the boot manager program, I'm pointing to boot from the empty Win-7 partition, which upon finding no OS, will cue it to boot from the DVD, and go on about its installation business.  So far so good.  At this point, Win7 will only "see" the empty partition reserved for it.  However, if Win7 tries to create an extra 1 or 2 new primary partitions (like how it came from the factory), the drive will end up with 6 primary partitions - not good.  So, my XP partitions would likely get overwritten. 
    Having 6 primary partitions wouldn't be a problem, as long as I create/manage them only with the boot manager - but in this case the Win7 installation would likely create them during installation instead. If I pre-create those partitions (the 1.5GB one, and the 10GB one) with the boot manager, can I point Win7 during the installation to utilize those?  How?
    One more side note:   When I'm in XP now, XP only "sees" it's own partition, but still senses that there's more room on the drive - it just considers it all as unallocated space.  I'm guessing Win7 would do the same thing?  And if it does, I'm worried it would start sticking its own new partitions there into what it "sees" as "unallocated space", even though my other partitions are there.
    If you made it through this longwinded mess, thanks for what help you can provide!  How should I get Win7 on there, without damaging the existing partitions?

    Ok, so I finally got it all to work. 
    In case anyone else runs into this question where you have to use the Toshiba recovery DVDs to reinstall Windows 7, without damaging other existant partitions, here's the trick:  You have to pre-create an NTFS primary partition at the very front of the disk (1st primary partition), make it at least 20GB (preferably more, since this will be where you run Windows7 - unless you also later create another partition solely for data/programs/etc). Then during the recovery, select the option to keep current partitioning intact.  Everything will be placed in that first partition alone (the contents of which which the Win7 setup will erase), and the rest of your disk will be fine. 
    If you have other partitions already there, and on the rest of the disk, you'll have to first resize the existing partitions to create enough room for this new 1st primary partition.  Then you'll have to shift or slide the current partitions up toward the back end of the disk (with 3rd party software). I also deleted the 1.5GB partition originally at the front of the disk (it's the startup repair partition, I learned), and I had previously deleted the 10GB recovery partition that came factory-placed at the back end of the disk. 
    The XP-partition I already had on the disk is tested and working fine, and wasn't touched at all by the Windows7 recovery installation.  Installing additional XP-images or other OS's should be simple enough now. 

  • HT203909 Why can't you provide specific instructions here about how to make the USB drive bootable?  The article referenced is not dedicated to Bootcamp--too long, too many options.  How do you make it bootable?

    Why can't you provide specific instructions here in HT203909 (Boot Camp: Creating an ISO image from a Windows installation DVD) about how to make the USB drive bootable?  The article referenced for partitioning the drive is not dedicated to Bootcamp--too long, too many options.  How do you make it bootable?

    If your BC Assistant shows the option to create a USB Installer, it automatically is marked as bootable. There is no need to have manual intervention to make a bootable USB. Once the process is manually modified, it is supported by the person modifying it.
    You have two or three options (depending on your Mac Model).
    1. Create USB... - Use a USB2 flash drive, which is erased and formatted. If your Mac supports ISOs then BCA will prompt for the Media. Any Mac which does not have a built-in Optical drive will support an ISO. There are specific Mac models which support both, DVD and USB based installation.
    2. Download Software from Apple servers...
    3. Install Windows...
    Are any additional instructions really necessary?

  • I'm still using Snow Leopard because heard too many horror stories about upgrading to Lion. But I can't upgrade Safari unless I upgrade OS. Is Mavericks any better than Lion?

    I'm still using Snow Leopard OS because I heard too many horror stories about people upgrading their OS to Lion.  But I can't upgrade Safari anymore unless I upgrade the OS. I get messages constantly telling me I need to upgrade my web browser, and have increasing problems correctly viewing pages (like L.A. TImes, NY TImes) because Safari needs upgrading.
    I can't really tell what the advantages are to upgrade to OS Mavericks or OS Yosemite because it seems most are intended for mobile apps, and I only use my desktop.
    My last upgrade to SNow Leopard wiped out 2/3 of my iPhoto collection. No idea why and no fix. Macs used to be the epitome of compatibility for upgrades — not anymore.
    What are my options? What issues would I encounter if I upgrade OS to Mavericks or to Yosemite? WHat are likely problems, advantages and disadvantages?
    Thanks for any help sent my way.

    If you do want to upgrade.
    Check that your computer is compatible with Mountain Lion/Mavericks/Yosemite.
    To check the model number hold down the option/alt key, go to the Apple menu and select System Information.
    iMac (Mid 2007 or newer) model number 7,1 or higher
    Your Mac needs:
    OS X v10.6.8 or OS X Lion already installed
    2 GB or more of memory (More is better - 4 GB minimum seems to be the consensus)
    8 GB or more of available space
    Check to make sure your applications are compatible. PowerPC applications are no longer supported after 10.6.      
    Application Compatibility
    Applications Compatibility (2)
    Do a backup before installing.
    One option is to create a new partition (~30- 50 GB), install Mavericks, and ‘test drive’ it. If you like/don’t like it it, you can then remove the partition. Do a backup before you do anything. By doing this, if you don’t like it you won't have to go though the revert process.

  • UCCX 9 - Too many transfer failures

    Hello guys,
    Need some help here as I get "Too many transfer failures" message when Im running the select resource step in my script. I am sure that it's not the problem with the script as it works previously. Attach also the MIVR logs and I'm highlighting the part where I think it's the cause of the issue.
    6451: Feb 23 10:03:38.447 SGT %MIVR-SS_TEL-7-UNK:CallID:0 MediaId:4068/1 Task:27000000001, TerminalConnection to Terminal: CTIP_9009 is HELD
    6452: Feb 23 10:03:38.449 SGT %MIVR-SS_TEL-7-UNK:OrigCall=CallID:0 MediaId:4068/1 Task:27000000001, ConsultEvent= ConsultCallActive
    6453: Feb 23 10:03:38.449 SGT %MIVR-SS_TEL-7-UNK:OrigCall=CallID:0 MediaId:4068/1 Task:27000000001, ConsultEvent= ConnCreatedEv 9009::1
    6454: Feb 23 10:03:38.449 SGT %MIVR-SS_TEL-7-UNK:OrigCall=CallID:0 MediaId:4068/1 Task:27000000001, ConsultEvent= ConnConnectedEv 9009::1
    6455: Feb 23 10:03:38.449 SGT %MIVR-SS_TEL-7-UNK:OrigCall=CallID:0 MediaId:4068/1 Task:27000000001, ConsultEvent= CallCtlConnInitiatedEv 9009::1
    6456: Feb 23 10:03:38.449 SGT %MIVR-SS_TEL-7-UNK:OrigCall=CallID:0 MediaId:4068/1 Task:27000000001, ConsultEvent= TermConnCreatedEv CTIP_9009
    6457: Feb 23 10:03:38.449 SGT %MIVR-SS_TEL-7-UNK:OrigCall=CallID:0 MediaId:4068/1 Task:27000000001, ConsultEvent= TermConnActiveEv CTIP_9009
    6458: Feb 23 10:03:38.449 SGT %MIVR-SS_TEL-7-UNK:OrigCall=CallID:0 MediaId:4068/1 Task:27000000001, ConsultEvent= CallCtlTermConnTalkingEv CTIP_9009
    6459: Feb 23 10:03:38.450 SGT %MIVR-SS_TEL-7-UNK:OrigCall=CallID:0 MediaId:4068/1 Task:27000000001, ConsultEvent= CallCtlConnDialingEv 9009::1
    6460: Feb 23 10:03:38.450 SGT %MIVR-SS_TEL-7-UNK:CallID:0 MediaId:4068/1 Task:27000000001 Got CallCtlConnDialingEv 9009::1, events on the AddressCallObserver.
    6461: Feb 23 10:03:38.453 SGT %MIVR-SS_TEL-7-UNK:OrigCall=CallID:0 MediaId:4068/1 Task:27000000001, ConsultEvent= CallCtlConnEstablishedEv 9009::1
    6462: Feb 23 10:03:38.453 SGT %MIVR-SS_TEL-7-UNK:CallID:0 MediaId:4068/1 Task:27000000001 consultWithoutMedia gets CiscoJtapiException: 0x0(CTIERR_UNSPECIFIED)::Unspecified error
    6463: Feb 23 10:03:38.454 SGT %MIVR-SS_TEL-7-UNK:OrigCall=CallID:0 MediaId:4068/1 Task:27000000001, ConsultEvent= ConnFailedEv 9009::1
    6464: Feb 23 10:03:38.454 SGT %MIVR-SS_TEL-7-UNK:OrigCall=CallID:0 MediaId:4068/1 Task:27000000001, ConsultEvent= CallCtlConnFailedEv 9009::1
    6465: Feb 23 10:03:38.454 SGT %MIVR-SS_TEL-7-UNK:CallID:0 MediaId:4068/1 Task:27000000001, ConsultCallObserver FAILED, cause: 109, callctl cause: 109
    6466: Feb 23 10:03:38.454 SGT %MIVR-SS_TEL-7-UNK:CallID:0 MediaId:4068/1 Task:27000000001, ConsultCallObserver():Received msg from original call Interrupted
    6467: Feb 23 10:03:38.454 SGT %MIVR-SS_TEL-7-UNK:OrigCall=CallID:0 MediaId:4068/1 Task:27000000001, ConsultEvent= CallObservationEndedEv
    6468: Feb 23 10:03:38.454 SGT %MIVR-SS_TEL-7-UNK:Call.transferFailed(6013, UNKNOWN) JTAPICallContact[id=0,implId=4068/1,state=STATE_ANSWERED_IDX,inbound=true,App name=HelpDesk,task=27000000001,session=5000000001,seq num=0,cn=4000,dn=4000,cgn=5010,ani=null,dnis=null,clid=null,atype=DIRECT,lrd=null,ocn=4000,route=RP[num=4000],OrigProtocolCallRef=0000000000000FE40121D1EF00000000,DestProtocolCallRef=null,TP=9009]
    Appreciate your help.

    I can make a pretty good guess on this one having seen the situation occur many times before. 
    UCCX is not aware of, and doesn't really understand, the partitions and call search spaces on CUCM.  When you do a select resource step, and attempt to send the call to the agent, the UCCX server will basically do a switch hook flash type supervised transfer to transfer the call to the agent.
    When the transfer attempt is made, the CTI port that the caller is queued on will attempt to outdial to the agent's extension.  It assumes that the agent phone is reachable, but has no way to verify this. 
    If the agent extension cannot be reached as a destination using the calling search space assigned to the CTI port, the transfer will fail.  The agent will likely get stuck in a reserved state, or maybe even made not ready by the system.  You can validate this by opening the dialed number analyzer in CUCM, and use the analyze function to dial the agent extension using the CSS assigned to your CTI ports. 
    Every time I've seen this problem over the years, the above issue was the problem.  Check it out and see if it doesn't solve your issue.
    Good luck!
    -Cliff

  • Intra-doc links (can you have too many??)

    I have an ebook that will be apprx 500 pages.  If I create intra-document links from the Table of Contents to each chapter,  then back links from each page in every chapter to the TOC  will this slow the perfomance of the PDF or does the number of intra-document links have no impact on performace.
    For example, if I had 12 chapters,  each chapter listed in the TOC would link to the first page of each chapter.
    All 500 pages would have a link on the bottom of each page that the user could click and be taken back to the TOC.
    Thanks for your help.

    I have some tables with over 100 million rows that still perform well, and I'm sure much larger tables are possible.  The exact number of rows would vary significantly depending on a number of factors including:
    Power of the underlying hardware
    Use of the table – frequency of queries and updates
    Number of columns and data types of the columns
    Number of indexes
    Ultimately the answer probably comes down to performance – if queries, updates, inserts, index rebuilds, backups, etc. all perform well, then you do not yet have too many rows.
    The best way to rearrange the data would be horizontal partitioning.  It distributes the rows into multiple files; which provides a number of advantages including the potential to perform well with larger number of rows.
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms190787.aspx

  • RE: (forte-users) [UNIX] "Too many open files" 3.0.M2question

    Actually, the stuff works in interpreted mode.
    It's only when having the server partition compiled that this happen.
    j-p
    -----Message d'origine-----
    De: Adamek, Zenon [mailto:ZAdamekpurolator.com]
    Date: lundi 25 septembre 2000 17:13
    &Agrave;: 'Jean-Paul.Gabriellisema.fr'
    Cc: Forte-userslists.xpedior.com
    Objet: RE: (forte-users) [UNIX] "Too many open files" 3.0.M2 question
    see Technote 10981
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Jean-Paul Gabrielli [SMTP:Jean-Paul.Gabriellisema.fr]
    Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 11:02 AM
    To: zeForte-users
    Subject: (forte-users) [UNIX] "Too many open files" 3.0.M2 question
    Hi,
    running a server partition that reads a configuration file,
    and apparently doen't close it after, I have that exception:
    SYSTEM ERROR: System Error: Too many open files, opening '....'with mode
    'r'
    Class: qqos_FileResourceException
    1) Is there such a limit, or does this rely only on the OS one ?
    2) How is this error not trapped, as I only got itinteractively, whereas
    my server log does a exception trap/segmentation fault,
    thanlks
    j-p
    For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
    the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe,send in a new
    email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com

    Hi Jean-Paul,
    As described in the Technote 10981 some Forte programs (Nodemanager and
    router) handle correct the high-file descriptor-use problem. It is possible
    that Forte interpreter do it correct too.
    Zenon
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Jean-Paul Gabrielli [SMTP:Jean-Paul.Gabriellisema.fr]
    Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 12:11 PM
    To: Adamek, Zenon
    Cc: Forte-userslists.xpedior.com
    Subject: RE: (forte-users) [UNIX] "Too many open files" 3.0.M2
    question
    Actually, the stuff works in interpreted mode.
    It's only when having the server partition compiled that this happen.
    j-p
    -----Message d'origine-----
    De: Adamek, Zenon [mailto:ZAdamekpurolator.com]
    Date: lundi 25 septembre 2000 17:13
    &Agrave;: 'Jean-Paul.Gabriellisema.fr'
    Cc: Forte-userslists.xpedior.com
    Objet: RE: (forte-users) [UNIX] "Too many open files" 3.0.M2 question
    see Technote 10981
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Jean-Paul Gabrielli [SMTP:Jean-Paul.Gabriellisema.fr]
    Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 11:02 AM
    To: zeForte-users
    Subject: (forte-users) [UNIX] "Too many open files" 3.0.M2 question
    Hi,
    running a server partition that reads a configuration file,
    and apparently doen't close it after, I have that exception:
    SYSTEM ERROR: System Error: Too many open files, opening '....'with mode
    'r'
    Class: qqos_FileResourceException
    1) Is there such a limit, or does this rely only on the OS one ?
    2) How is this error not trapped, as I only got itinteractively, whereas
    my server log does a exception trap/segmentation fault,
    thanlks
    j-p
    For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
    the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe,send in a new
    email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to:
    forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com
    >
    For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
    the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
    email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com

  • OCIObjectSetAttr performance deteriorates when binding too many Type params

    Hi,
    In my application, when I passed a Type Array as parameter to the stored procedure and when the Type Array is large enough(normally 3000 type objects, each objects has about 15 attributes), the OCIObjectSetAttr performance deteriorates large enough from below 1 millisecond to 1~3 miliseconds.
    I am using OCI 11gR2, does anyone notice it and know how to optimize it?
    Regards,
    -Bruce

    Hi Steve,
    Locking algorithms are used to ensure correct behavior when concurrent threads or processes access and update shared data structures. Too many deadlocks is a symptom of too much contention.
    One very effective way to reduce contention (and hence deadlocks) is by careful application design. Here are a few things you can do to improve the situation (these are general suggestions; they may or may not be applicable in your application, but certainly worth considering).
    - "contention friendly" data model and data - for example, but choosing random (but unique) keys, you will reduce the contention on the b-tree index for concurrent inserts.
    - partitioning the data - if you have n threads, and create n databases, where each thread inserts data into its own database, then you'll dramatically reduce the locking contention. If the data files are on separate spindles, you'll also reduce the IO bottleneck.
    - keep transactions short
    - hold write locks for the shortest possible duration
    It may be worth trying some of these ideas.
    The next release of Berkeley DB (version 4.8) is coming soon; it has significant enhancements specifically designed to reduce contention. I'd certainly recommend studying the new features and enhancements and then trying out BDB 4.8.
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks and warm regards.
    ashok joshi
    Director, Oracle Berkeley DB development

  • About ORA-00600 [kdiss_pin_hdr: too many] error

    I meet a 'ORA-00600: ... parameter: [kdiss_pin_hdr: too many],[],[],[],[],[],[],[]' error when executing:
    set transaction use rollback segment rbs_large_01;
    select
    CUST_NO||','||
    TEL_NO||','||
    ADDRESS||','||
    ADDR_CODE_PREF||','||
    ADDR_CODE_CITY||','||
    ADDR_CODE_ZONE||','
    from
    CUSTOMER
    where
         ADDR_CODE_ZONE = '000';
    My system:
    Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.0.1.2.0 - Production
    With the Partitioning option
    System name:     SunOS
    Release:     5.8
    Version:     Generic_108528-21
    Machine:     sun4u
    The sql should output about 70,000 rows, but it's stopped with the ora-00600 error after output 40,000 rows.
    The table has 10,000,000 rows
    rbs_large_01 is 512M - 2G
    tempory tablespace is 2G
    What's the error mean?
    How can I resolve or avoid it?

    Hi
    i found in bug database:
    bug 1827660 which is fixed in the 9.0.1.3 patchset
    so, i mentioned use the latest patchset
    lajos

Maybe you are looking for