Value Scale not considered in Subsequent Settlement

Hello experts,
i am in SAP 4.6c and i am having a problem with scale values on vendor rebates.
I have configured the system following the best practices of sap and setted an agreement based only on the vendor.
Everything seems to work fine except that when i execute MEB4 (create settlement via report) the system always get the first line of the value scale.
I am using the standard condition type A001.
Does anyone have a guess on what is wrong???
regards,
Diogo
Edited by: diogo dalessandro on Jan 4, 2008 10:33 AM

you must maintain the value scales for each period on the overview (mountain boutton)!

Similar Messages

  • Rounding Value is not considered for MB lot size

    Hi
    I have a scenario where MB (Monthly Lot size) lot size is used with rounding value. Example as below:
    Lot size: MB
    Min Lot size: 15000
    Rounding Value: 20000
    DEMAND: 16000
    When MRP run, System is creating the 16000 as P Req instead of 20000 which is the rounding value.
    Pl let me know, if I need to apply OSS note / any other solution for this.
    Thanks,
    JK
    Edited by: Janakiram Katakam on May 17, 2010 4:57 AM

    Dear ,
    Are you using any Rouding Profile in MRP1 view ?
    What is the Setup in OMI4 for MB-Lot Size .Remove the tick mark in Last Lot Exat if it is marked .By specifing the rounding value, the system will determine during lot size calculation that lot size qty is a multiple of of an order unit(eg : pallet size if mtrl is delivered in entire pallets...).
    Please check what is the Lot Size Indicator or Lot size procedure assinged to it ?
    2.you can use rounding profiles...its used to define the setting of rounding up or rounding down the order proposal qty into deliverable quantities...rounding profile maintenance the t-code is OWD1. Here for static rounding profile
    Rounding profiles are defined under:
    spro-> purchasing->consumption based planning->planning->lot size calculation ->maintain rounding profiles...
    it consist of threshold value and rounding value...
    the threshold val is the value from which the system rounds the value of the next deliverable units upto...
    the rounding value is from which the systemshd round up to as soon as threshold value is exceeded...
    Otherwise ,  Check FM MD_ROUNDING_VALUE
    Regards
    JH
    Regards
    JH

  • Subsequent settlement with different volumes (scale and rebate)

    Hi
    A nice question for you all.
    In subsequent settlement I want to do the following:
    Interval scales:
    >$100.000 -> 1% rebate
    >$450.000 -> 2% rebate
    >$600.000 -> 3% rebate
    (this is easy)
    When I want to determine the business volume I want to differentiate between:
    - trucks
    - cars
    Based on the following numbers:
    Annual business volume for trucks: $200.000
    Annual business volume for cars: $300.000
    Total volume: $500.000
    This means the rebate wil fall in the 2% interval.
    BUT.... the rebate is ONLY for cars and NOT for trucks.
    --> 2% of 300.000 = $6.000
    How to do this?
    Regards,
    Arno

    Sangeeta,
    What do you think of the following:
    Build up business volume for every delivery of the supplier and also for the trucks.
    I will make two rebates:
    For the total volume:
    >$100.000 -> -1% rebate
    >$450.000 -> -2% rebate
    >$600.000 -> -3% rebate
    For the trucks volume:
    >$100.000 -> +1% rebate
    >$450.000 -> +2% rebate
    >$600.000 -> +3% rebate
    Since the trucks will be in the +1% rate and the total volume will be in the 2% rate I have to change the interval for the scales condition manually in trx MEU2, but not the price condition. After the comparisation is finished both are in the +/- 2% scale and I can settle the agreement.
    Only one manual step needed, sounds as a fine solution, do you agree?

  • Subsequent settlement in MM(Vendor rebate)

    I'm using subsequent settlement(rebate) on vendor side with partial settlement with the help of settlement calendar. However during vendor rebate maintenance in step of condition maintenance, I maintained condition rate(rebate discount) and scales on main condition. However system only copied automatically condition rate at main condition to period-specific condition not for scales. So I had to do it manually by copying scales at main condition to individual period-specific conditions. It's quite a tough life to do this. Could anyone give me some light to make life better for example any missing configuration or any enhancement.
    Home

    Hi,
    Use BADI to create rebate agreement in MM.You can explore following BAdI.
    These BAdI are applicable for MM & SD applications:
    (a) SD_BONUS_CREDIT_NOTE BAdI for Rebate Credit Memo Requirements
    (b) SD_COND_DETAIL Enhancement in Condition Detail Screen
    (c) SD_COND_SAVE_A Save condition application A, E
    I hopr this will help you out. Thanking you.

  • Subsequent settlement  "Urgent"

    Hi folks ,
    a). Can anyone explain subsequent settlement process  in brief and how its done in SAP?
    b). Also please explain business volume ??.
    whats business volume comparison ?
    Points for helpful answers
    Regards
    Kumar

    Dear Kumar,
    Subsequent settlement is big subject in SAP , however I will give you brief idea.
    Subsequent settlement is normally done in following ways
    1) Subsequent Debit  or Credit.
    a) This is done in case there is change in total value of invoice of PO item ( Value difference)
    b) Total Invoice Qty remain unchanged
    c) Only value base transaction takes place & not Qty based
    d) if the cost are incurred - Enter subsequent Debit in MIRO screen
    e) If credit memo is received from vendor enter subsequent credit in MIRO
    f) System suggest only entire invoice Qty & not value
    g)Maximum Qty that can be debited / credited is less or equal to invoiced amount.
    h)cannot refer to particular invoice
    i) List separately in PO history
    J) If Qty is already delivered thae system makes offset entry in stock A/c , Price difference or consumption account as applicable
    k) If qty is not red. then system makes offset entry in GRIR A/C & when good are delivered system post amount to respective stock Accounts.
    2) Invoice Reduction
    a)If invoice shows a variance when compared to expected Qty or expected value & you don't want to accept difference you can reduce invoice.
    b) There is special display in item list for invoice reduction in MIRO
    c) When you post reduction invoice document two Accounting documents are generated one actual value & qty as per invoice posting & another one is credit memo for difference between actual Qty
    I hope above explanation will give you brief idea how it works.
    If useful please reward points,
    Vivek Maitra

  • Rebate- Subsequent Settlement

    I am configuring subsequent settlement scenario. I want to know is there a provision to display rebate value in PO against condition type ( e.g if rebate condition type is A001 can rebate value be displayed against  and is PO value calculated considering the  rebate ? ) . Currently I can see " 0" against the condition type.

    HI,
    Please chk in the config....
    SPRO>MM->purchasing-->Partner Determination->Partner setting in Rebate Arrangement--->Define partner schemas for Rebate..
    Here please check the partner function "PI" is made mandatory...
    You can main the Partner function "PI" in the agreement itself...
    Goto t-code MEB2 & enter the agreement no,  inside click the icon "Agreement Partner" or (Ctrl+F2) and maintain the partner function PI..
    find below link
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_40b/helpdata/en/12/08595a470311d1894a0000e8323352/content.htm
    Regards
    Raj
    Edited by: R.Rasumalla on Oct 21, 2011 6:37 PM
    Moderator message:
    Warning: Copy-pasted answer from someone else's work:
    Issue in Vendor Rebate Settlement (ECC 6.0)
    Please refrain from doing such things in the future. Please also don't do linkfarming.
    Points will be removed.
    Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Oct 23, 2011 7:54 PM

  • Lead time values are not appearing in the report for current year.

    Hi friends,
    Iam checking a report in production.  where lead time values are displayed as 0 for 1 key figure lead time3 (w/0 dim) . i found there is a formula for this it shows like NODIM ( 'Lead Time 3' ).and there is a value for cal.lead time
    how can i get values in the report.
    Thanks ,
    VRV.

    Hi,
    Although your question is not clear, I understood that the formula built on that KF is NODIM. Basically it means, units of measurement is not considered when calculating.
    Eg: 5 Minutes + 5 Kilograms = 10
    You please try to analyze your KF by the above logic. Then you would be able to figure out why the data is not appearing in the report..
    Assign if helps...
    Regards,
    Suman

  • Open items not considering in credit check.

    Dear Experts,
    We have implemented credit management in our new role out company code with the same credit controlling area for both company codes.
    As per our configuration at the time of sales order creation, credit limit has to be checked and check the open items and oldest open items. It is working fine in old company code, but in new company code its not considering the open/old open items its only checking the credit exposure value. But the old company code its checking the credit exposure and open items and old open items.
    In OVA8 we have configured the below way
    selected the Dynamic check box  - reaction C
    selected the Cretical fields check box  - reaction A
    selected the Open items check box  - reaction A
    selected the OldestOpen items check box  - reaction A
    The above credit management is working fine in quality for both company codes, but in production its working fine only old company code.
    I have already checked the all relevant configuration and requests, there is no issue in configuration.
    Please let me know the possibilities for not considering the open items for credit check

    Hello
    You are absolutely right ,  the automatic credit control is at credit control Area level and not at company code level. Need to know few things from your end.
    why business has not set up the new credit control area, when new company code has been configured. I think this would have made more sense .........
    however its bit strange that sales recevables are not getting considered in the credit check, only in production ....... I think you need to keep your search on in SDN as well as try to search for any sap not in Service market .......
    Once you get the answer; hope you update the thread ........
    wish you luck in your search ......
    Cheers
    Big Screams ...........

  • Prompt is not considered in Report

    Hi All,
    I am using OBIEE 10.1.3.4.0.
    Creating a following report
    report coulmns:
    week_no sales date location
    filter:
    location prompted
    week_no prompted
    date prompted
    Prompts:
    Week_no
    date
    location
    In my report the date values is not getting considered.When I select the date value it select sales data for all the data present in the table.
    Week_no is working fine.
    I check the query in the log but the date filed values is not getting considered.
    Please suggest.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Ensure that you are using exactly the same formula (TableName.ColumnName) in both filter and prompt.
    Thanks

  • System is not considering Planned Delivery time

    Dear Gurus,
    As iam planning for the month of January and running the MRP,schedulelines are getting generated but system is not condering Planned Delivery time maintained in the material master ie. 7days.Following is the example:
    I have a FERT-X with a component A-1PC in its BOM and its planned delvery time from vendor is 7 Days.If iam running the MRP on 13/12/2010 for FERT-X  100 PCS for January1,2011 then the schedule lines are getting generated for for component A is on 01/01/2011.But PDT is maintianed in material master is 7 days and same has been maintianed in vendor inforecord.But system is not considering it.
    Kindly help to resolve the issue.
    With Regards.

    I have one ROH which has two different vendors.
    Two scheduling Agreemnt with target qty 100000 kg each.
    Two different Vendor info record with Min. order qty maintained.V1-1000Kg,V2-6000Kg.
    One source list with two vendors and with respective scheduling agreement.
    Quota arrangement is there in which SOB is maintiained 50:50.
    I hv the requirement of 3084 kg of ROH.
    I run the MRP and two diiferent schedule lines are getting generated with 50:50 qty as mentioned in Quota arrangement.
    Not considering the minimum order qty maintiained in vendor info record.
    The above process is correct
    Only One doubt In Quota Arrangement?
    IS two schedule line is created after MRP run?
    Generally System will  select a vendor Whose Quota value is less
    quota rating   = quota base quantity + quota-allocated quantity/ quota
    Edited by: Sundaresan . E. V on Dec 14, 2010 3:26 PM

  • FI-AP Tax Code not considering the excise duty while calcuating the VAT

    Sub: A/P Tax Code not considering the excise duty while calcuating the VAT
    Hi Frnds.
    I have a typical problem.
    Till now we are using a "W6" as a tax code, where Excise-10%, Ed Cess-2%, SEd Cess-1% and VAT-4%.
    But as the Govt. rules changed I have created a new tax code "W8" by copying the W6 and modified the VAT to 5% by changing the condition record JVRD.
    The new tax code is not calculating VAT part correctly. It is taxing into consideration Invoice Base value, Ed Cess & SEd Cess (Omiting the Excise Duty).
    I have checked my Tax Procedure, there everything is fine. Even my old tax code "W6" is working correctly.
    Let me know where the error lies.
    Here is the scenario
    00. Tax code                       -   W6   -   W8   - Current Staus of W8
    01. Invoice Base               - 355181 - 351798 - 353324 (by SAP Document Simulation View)
    02. Excise @ 10% on 01.        -  35518 -  35180 -  35332
    03. Ed Cess @ 2% on 01.        -    710 -    704 -    707
    04. SEd Cess @ 1% on 01.       -    355 -    352 -    353
    05. VAT @ 4% on (010203+04)  -  15671 -   0     -  0
    05.    VAT @ 5% on (010203+04)  -    0    -  19401 -  0
    05.     VAT @ 5% on (010304)     -   0     -    0    -  17719
    INVOICE TOTAL VALUE            - 407435 - 407435 - 407435
    Pls. let me know how to come over the issue.
    By the way I am using the above tax code at FB60 transaction code.
    Regards
    Krishna
    Edited by: Gopi Krishna Gutti on Oct 17, 2011 10:18 AM

    Hi Vivek
    Acutually we planned to implement SAP - FI & MM Modules only, and all the configuration is done in the system, but at the final stage our management is not satisfied with MM area, so finally we have gone live with only FI Moudle.
    By the way thankyou for the reply. I have maintained 100% in JMX1 for the new tax code and it is working fine.
    I will give you full points.
    Once again thanks a lot.
    Regards
    Krishna

  • Condition Value is not updated

    Hi All,
    I am using bill of services, so i have a sales order and as a subsequent document a service entry sheet, my invoice is created with reference to the service entry sheet.
    In my price procedure i have a percentage guarantee condition.
    In the sales order i insert a percentage for the condition, afterwards i create a service entry sheet with reference to the sales order and all the conditions values are copied correctly, till here everything ok.
    In the SES i change the guarantee condition value and then i create the invoice, but the guarantee condition value is not updated and takes the value i inserted before in the sales order.
    I already tried to change the condition copy control but no sucess.
    Anyone can help me with this issue??
    Thank you.
    Best Regards,
    Tiago Ferreira

    Hi Madhu,
    Here is my code:
        SALES_CONDITIONS_IN-ITM_NUMBER = I_UPLOAD-ITMNUMBER.
        SALES_CONDITIONS_IN-COND_TYPE = I_UPLOAD-COND_TYPE.
        SALES_CONDITIONS_IN-COND_VALUE = I_UPLOAD-COND_VALUE / 10.
        APPEND SALES_CONDITIONS_IN.
        CLEAR SALES_CONDITIONS_IN.
        SALES_CONDITIONS_INX-ITM_NUMBER = I_UPLOAD-ITMNUMBER.
        SALES_CONDITIONS_INX-COND_TYPE = I_UPLOAD-COND_TYPE.
        SALES_CONDITIONS_INX-UPDATEFLAG = 'U'.
        SALES_CONDITIONS_INX-COND_VALUE = 'X'.
        APPEND SALES_CONDITIONS_INX.
        CLEAR SALES_CONDITIONS_INX.
    I am just creating a CMR with reference to billing document. Its creating condition recod 'ZAP0' correctly, which i am passing manally. But, its not  populating condition value to levy condition it should determine automatically.
    Please suggest.
    Regards,
    Srikanth.

  • Error in CJ88  Posting transaction is not possible (value date not allowed)

    When i try CJ88 with a wbs element, it shows the following error :
    Posting transaction is not possible (value date not allowed)
    Message no. AA 478
    Diagnosis
    A retirement was already posted on the asset 000022400733 0041 on 20091231. Based on the value date 20091231 of the transaction, this transaction should have been included in the calculation of values for the retirement.
    System Response
    The transaction is rejected.
    Procedure
    Check the value date of the transaction.
    In need to put year 2009 in date of the transaction, but it isnt posible. ¿Why? I dont know very much about asset accounting...

    Hi
    It is not allowing for WBS element final settlement, because of your asset already retairement was done.
    By best suggetion is, You will create the new WBS element and transfer the all cost line items from old WBS element to new WBS element, then you will try to settlement for another asset in CJ88.
    I hope it will use for you.
    Regards
    PVCPVC

  • Is there a possibility should not consider available quantity at time of MR

    Sir,
    Is there a possibility should not consider available quantity at time of MRP planning?
    Example:
    Available stock: 100
    Planning stock: 100 (MD61)
    Schedule line to be generate: 100 Qty (Exclude the available quantity at time of MRP planning)
    regards,
    sampath

    Dear Sampath/Raj,
    1) Move the stock to particular storage location for which you don't want to be consider by MRP
    2) Now go to OMIR t-code, input value as 1 for that particular storage location
    3) Go to MMSC, input value as 1 for that particular storage location
    4) Go to MRP - 4 view Down you can find field Storage location input value as 1
    5) Now run MRP, system will not consider stock of that particular storage location
    Regards
    Madhu

  • Subsequent Settlement

    Hi friends,
    Please assist here. I have set the settlement type to "debit-side settlement accounting purchase org. level" on the Settlement subscreen of the arrangement type details screen.
    This is because i want to award an invoice to vendors.
    Now for some reason the arrangement type does now appear from the drop down list when i want to create a rebate argreement via MEB1.
    I have also maintained the the BM1 & BM3 document types on the debit-site settlement subscreen.
    Can anybody assist me and explain what could be the potential error.
    your help will be much appriciated.

    Hi,
    credit-side settlement works with vendor billing. This is a function from the MM application.
    Debit-side settlement works with customer billing, which is a function of the SD application. In this case the subsequent settlement functionality uses customer billing documents to create the settlement.                                          
    Please check the note 153694 - Credit-side or debit-side settlement type  
    Regards,
    Edit

Maybe you are looking for