Vendor evaluation logic while going MIGO

Hi all,
while doing GR in MIGO, quality reliablity & on time delivery
scores were updated material wise in S013 table.how the system is calculated these scores.i nees that formula.
plz provide the solution.
thanks and regards,
K.Anburaja.

Hi,
Check whether SAP Note 1079123 - Missing Excise tab in MIGO is applied properly or not?
Symptom: - In Transaction MIGO, in case of goods receipt with excise,Excise Tab forthe corresponding material document is not displayed from Release 470 andabove.
Solution: - Please apply the code changes as specified in the note.

Similar Messages

Vendor evaluation while doing SES

Hi all,
is there any way i can update vendor evaluation subcriteria while doing service entry sheet. is there any field which i can update for vendor evaluation for services Po.
Regards,
qsm sap

Hi,
In short I believe the answer is no, evaluation can only be done through standard transactions. Perhaps one for your development guys, but the benefits really need to be weighed up. Standard transactions should have what you require.
You could always maintain an LSMW for evaluation input, so record scores for each SES on a spreadsheet and then upload this to evaluation periodically.
Thanks.

Smoothing factors for Vendor Evaluation for Services

Hi Team,
How to apply smoothing factors for Quality and Timeliness of services in External Services. Any help is appreciated.
Thanks
ANita.

Hi ,
I will try to explain with one example
Actually in vendor evaluation , we are going to get only one percentage say for a material A for example Qty reliability - smoothing factor is 0.20
Material A is ordered by so many purchase orders and many goods receipts are done in many times. Goods receipt is done 6 times till now and the score is 80% . Now GR is done for 7th time . If the qty reliability is 100 % for this GR
the score is calculated in the following way
80%0.8+100%0.2 --- this the score after the 7th goods receipt....
Hope now u understand .... If u still have queries please post your feedback...
If u are satisfied , please reward points
Regrads
Mani

Vendor Evaluation-Scoring logic for percentage

Dear Experts,
I have mention below % and score of vendors for sub criteria on-time delivery,it is mention in std SAP..I want to know % value is calculated here? how negative % values is given score?
-          100     On-time del.
1,0       90     On-time del.
2,0         95     On-time del.
10,0         80     On-time del.
20,0         60     On-time del.
30,0         40     On-time del.
40,0         20     On-time del.
50,         5     On-time del.
99,9           1     On-time del.
-5,0            95     On-time del.
-10,0     65     On-time del.
-20,0     75     On-time del.
-30,0     60     On-time del.
-40,0     40     On-time del.
-50,0     20     On-time del.
-60,0     5     On-time del.
-99,9     1     On-time del.
Thanks,

Hi Shyam,
I am also looking for the same.
can u send me the full details of the Vendor Evaluation score % calculation .
and MANUAL, Semi Auromatic, Fully Automatic Evaluation. what is the difference.
what is the function of end user for execute Vendor evaluation for all the VENDORS AT A TIME.?
Regards,
Anthyodaya.

Custom report for vendor evaluation

Hai All,
My client requires custom report to show the vendor evaluation i.e., it has to show the working how it has arrived at the final score, to be clear systems works automatically and displays the final score based on certain main and sub criteria that working has to be shown in a table format for the purpose of TPM audit.
Regards
R.Senthilnambi

Hi Senthil,
u can download the documents from sap help to show the logic to ur audit, how sap will calculate the scores.
If they insist for certain data with logic, u can develop a z-report and show them for 10 or 20 materials.
hope this resolves ur problem

Error While Posting MIGO for a Suncontracting PO ..

Hi All
I have created a Subcontracting PO and then transffered the material to subcon vendor's stock. now while doing MIGO for the same PO i am getting error as :
"Account determination for entry EKCA FRN not possible"
Please let me know why this error is coming?
Anjan

Hi Pradeep
Thanks for your reply. I knew that G/L account entry in OBYC under FRN key is required but my concern is few days back I was doing MIGO successfully though same sttings were there that time also. Could please point put if any other thing is missing.
Second would like to know how system is identifying FRN key?
Anjan

Error while doing MIGO for a sub-contracted item

Hello to Everybody,
I am facing below problem -
Error : Incorrect CCtr <Cost Center Code> with this account (CCtr category must=D) for
<Item Code> , while doing MIGO. (for receiving sub-contracted item from vendor).
May I request for possible solution to above error ?
regards,

Dear Sanjay,
You can determine the cost object for the posting of the costs in the transaction OKB9.
Following thread should resolve this issue:
Re: cost of subcontracting
Regards,
Naveen.

Error while saving MIGO

Dear Guru's
While saving Goods movement (MIGO) in IDES server for SAP ECC 6.0, I am getting following error:
"Please select complaince for Shipping instructions."
Please let me know any config setting required or any thing missing out.
Regards,
Prashanth Pai

Hi Prashant
Shipping instruction is a condition that u specify to the vendor that the materials should be sent in compliance with ur shipping condition. for ex for polished goods u can say shipping instruction as " scratch free" in the PO.
So while doing MIGO u have to manually check for the scratches in the materials and enter the same in the GRN. This feature is automatically checked by the system during MIGO since it is specified in PO.
Hope u get cleared now
reg
Raja

Error while doing MIGO

Hi Experts,
While doing migo system showing the error message:
in this purchase order no excise.
It is IS OIL process.
Maintain pricing conditions for the material for the excise invoice date
Message no. 8I629
Pls help some one.
Regards,
Hanuman.

HI
is it Excisable Material, did you maintain the Tax indicator in PO stage? IF yes , next step is to check , are you selecting the right Post to....... register menu during MIGO, for example we use Post to Part-1 register only, then if yes , the you are getting this error becuse you have missed the J1ID master data details. Minimum you should maintain 1. chapter_id details, 2. Material and chapter_id combination 3. Vendor Excise details. for the materials you are tring to make GR.
Best Regards
SAM

Vendor Evaluation - Query

Dear all.
I need to create a query for the Process vendor Evaluation, that display the Notes of one Vendor. Is there a logical database to access this Info.
At the moment i created an infoset link to table ELBK, and created some Adicional Fields but when i'm generating the Infoset System Returns the Following Message "Do all fields used have a name? (use help)".
Best Regards
Thanks in Advanced
PMR

Could you explain what you mean in your reply.
Thanks in advance
Roger

Vendor evaluation URGENT

While using the t- code ME61 for Vendor Evaluation I am getting an error that Purchasing organization data is incomplete Pls. Help me
regards

Hi
Vendor evaluations done at Purchase organization level.You have to define the control parameters at Purchase organization level.
Path for configuring the Vendor eveluation:
<b>SPRO> MM> Purchasing --> Vendor eveluation --> Define Purchase organization data for Vendor eveluation.</b>
Here you have to enter your purcvhase organization and define the control parameters like Best score,Applicability period etc.
If you want std configuration, please copy std Purchase org (1000) settings to your purchase organization by selecting copy as.
Regards
Ramakrishna

Vendor Evaluation by Material and Material Group wise

Dear Folks,
Customer requirement is to see subcriterion level scores of Vendor
Evaluation according to material, Material group wise. But the
datasource provided by SAP is providing the data according to
Purchasing Organisation level and Vendor level (0MM_PUR_VE_01).Is it
Possible to break the scores according to material group and material
as TC in r/3: ME6B provides ranking based on Main Criterion level
scores. If possible, what is the logic?
Thanks in Advance

Hi Anil,
Thanks for ur reply.
But Customer requires vendor evaluation data through Automatic route.
0MM_PUR_VE_02 caters to semi-automatic data which needs to be configured in r/3, and customer doesn't want to do that. Is there any other solution.

Vendor Evaluation (End-User process)

which are the end user transaction code for the activity involved in the Vendor Evaluation?
I need the Steps considering the creation of Purchase requisition till the report of Vendor evaluation.
**Urgent**
Regards
Sandeep

Hi Sandeep,
I just have heard abt the process which i would like to share with u...
the process goes like this
PR ==> RFQ ==> Quotation ==> price comparison
Guru's if I'm wrong please correct me. Even i would like to know the transaction code involved in this...
anything left by my side pls do correct me.
regards
namrati

Alternative for extractor 2LIS_02_S013 Vendor Evaluation InfoCube 0PUR_C02

Hi BW Gurus
Could some one advise me any alternative for 2LIS_02_S013 (Vendor Evaluation).
Vendor evaluation data is required for my customer.
At present 0PUR_C02 (Vendor evaluation) deactivated. due to miss match of fields S013, S013BIW1 and S013BIW2.
We are facing MIGO posting error update terminated. Now i had deactivated S013 at LBW0.
We already tried as per SAP note Note 115192 and 818652.
But thre is no use.
Look forward to your valuble replays and points will be awareded .
Thankyou

Hi,
There is no alternative alternative for 2LIS_02_S013 to upload the cube 0PUR_C02
But I hope, we can replace the cube 0PUR_C02 with 0PUR_C05 .0PUR_C05 gets the data by the data source 0MM_PUR_VE_01.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/e7/daba37d4c2503ee10000009b38f842/frameset.htm
With rgds,
Anil Kumar Sharma .P

Delivery rating in vendor evaluation

Can I know on what logic system calculates the delivery rating, for schedule agreement which has more than one schedule lines.
Regards,
M.M

Dear Magesh,
This is for On time delivery:
===========================================================
At the time of a goods receipt against a purchase order, the system checks whether the delivery was on time or late:
GR date - delivery date = date variance
If the delivery was on time, the system checks whether a minimum delivery quantity is to be taken into account.
It checks the Minimum delivery quantity/standardizing value for delivery time variance from material indicator.
If the indicator has been selected, it checks whether a value has been maintained in the material master record.
If a value exists, it is used. If no value exists, the value from the Minimum delivery percentage field is used. If there no such value in this case either, goods receipts of fractions of the order quantity are included in the calculation of the score.
If the indicator has not been selected, the value from the Minimum delivery percentage field is used. If no value exists, goods receipts of fractions of the order quantity are included in the calculation of the score.
If the minimum delivery quantity is not reached, the system does not determine a score for the goods receipt.
If the minimum delivery quantity is reached and the delivery date adhered to, the variance is zero and the system awards the highest points score for the relevant goods receipt.
If the delivery is not on time, the system calculates the date variance in days and converts it into a percentage variance.
In the process, the system searches for the standardizing value as follows:
It checks the Minimum delivery quantity/standardizing value for delivery time variance from material indicator.
If the indicator has been selected, it checks whether a value has been maintained in the material master record.
If a value exists, it is used. If not, the value from the Standardizing value for delivery time variance field is used. If there is no such value in this case either, one of the following values is used:
in the case of goods receipts against scheduling agreement releases: the firm zone
in the case of goods receipts against purchase orders: the difference between the statistical delivery date and the order date
If the indicator has not been selected, the value from the Standardizing value for delivery time variance field is used. If there is no such value, one of the following values is used
in the case of goods receipts against scheduling agreement releases: the firm zone
in the case of goods receipts against purchase orders: the difference between the statistical delivery date and the order date
The system then awards the score you defined in Customizing for this percentage variance.
The new score is then included in the vendor's previous score for the subcriterion. To calculate the new score for the subcriterion from the already existing composite score and this new individual score, the system applies the smoothing factor Date variance defined in Customizing.
When you run a new evaluation, the system calculates the average of the individual scores for all materials. The result is the vendor's score for "On-Time Delivery Performance".
If a goods receipt covers several schedule lines, MM Vendor Evaluation performs this calculation for each schedule line.
This results in more than one score for the single goods receipt. Each of these scores is multiplied by the quantity delivered against the relevant schedule line and is thus weighted by quantity.
The sum of the weighted points scores is divided by the total goods receipt quantity. The result is the score for this one goods receipt.
The score for the goods receipt is smoothed and included in the existing score for on-time delivery performance for the vendor
Adherence to Conf. Date :
===========================================================
1. When a goods receipt is posted for an order item, the system checks whether open inbound deliveries exist for the order item, i.e. inbound deliveries for which no goods receipts have yet been recorded.
If open inbound deliveries exist, the system checks whether the date previously notified by the vendor has been adhered to or whether the goods receipt date differs from the date thus confirmed:
GR date - date confirmed by vendor in shipping notification = date variance
2. If the delivery was on time, the system checks whether a minimum delivery quantity has been defined in Customizing.
a. If you have not set a minimum delivery quantity, goods receipts representing partial deliveries will also be included in the calculation of the score.
b. If the minimum delivery quantity is not reached, the system does not determine a score for the goods receipt.
c. If the minimum delivery quantity is reached and the delivery is on time, the variance is zero. This means that the system awards the maximum score for the goods receipt.
3. If the delivery date is not in accordance with the notified one, the system calculates the date variance in days and converts it into a percentage variance.
4. The system then awards the score you defined in Customizing for this percentage variance.
5. The new score is then merged with the vendor's previous score for the subcriterion. To calculate the new score for the subcriterion from the already existing composite score and this new individual score, the system applies the smoothing factor On-time delivery performance/Timeliness of service provision (defined in Customizing for Vendor Evaluation under Purchasing organization data for Vendor Evaluation).
6. When you run a new evaluation, the system calculates the average of the individual scores for all materials. The result is the vendors score for adherence to the confirmation date.
If a goods receipt covers several schedule lines, MM Vendor Evaluation performs this calculation for each schedule line.
This results in more than one score for the single goods receipt. Each of these scores is multiplied by the quantity delivered against the relevant schedule line and is thus weighted by quantity.
The sum of the weighted points scores is divided by the total goods receipt quantity. The result is the score for this one goods receipt.
The score for the goods receipt is smoothed and merged with the existing score for adherence to the confirmation date for the vendor.
Regards,
w1n

Vendor evaluation logic while going MIGO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for