WebCenter user role not getting propagated

Hi,
I am creating a WebCenter WSRP portlet application. I expected, after registering the application as a portlet, when I will consume it in WebCenter, the currently logged in user's name and role will be accessible. But in my case, when I am trying to check the logged in user's role using request.isUserInRole(...) method, it always return false. When I debugged the application, I saw that the user role is empty.
Can someone please help me understand, if I have to do anything to successfully propagate the logged user's role to the custom portlet application.
Just so you know, I could access the logged in user's name using request.getUserPrincipal().getName(). Please help.
Thank you,
Kanchan Upadhyay

Hi,
Yes, I am using LDAP and everything else in webcenter works fine. Just the user role is not getting propagated to my custom application developed using portlet. I have tried in taskflow also, seems like the user role is not accessible from there as well. Is there any specific way of accessing user information for custom application hosted in webcenter as portlets?
Your help is appreciated!!
Thank you,
Kanchan

Similar Messages

Webcenter Application Roles not getting imported in UCM on Migration

Hi All,
I migrated the webcenter resources (Service Data, Customizations and security policies) and UCM content (Using configuration utility, Archiver and Folder Archive components). After migration I am able to see the application roles in the destination webcenter spaces instance by navigating to Webcenter Spaces -> Security -> Application Roles, but I am not able to see the corresponding accounts created in the UCM for that particular user.
For Ex: I have a application role: s1a472022_f8bb_48e1_a519_15841780df72#-#Moderator in Webcenter Spaces for user ABC
In UCM I am not able to see the account AUTHEN/s1a472022f8bb48e1a51915841780df72 for the user ABC.
I verified in the source UCM instance and I am able to see the accounts in that instance.
Please help me out. Let me know if extra details required.
Thanks,
Sachin

Hi Srinath,
Yes, I have migrated data from UCM1 to UCM2 using insert script. But, I think there should be some other way also. There may be some options to check while creating export archive. We can migrate UCM schema tables also while migrating the content but I was not able to find USEREXTENDEDATTRIBUTES table. There are some other options like export additional user config, I need to check those options also.
Thanks,
Sachin

Active substitute maintained for a user is not getting workitems for approv

Hi,
Active substitute maintained for a user is not getting workitems for approval.Earlier he was getting
but now a days he is not getting.
Roles wise also , i checked, it is proper.
Please advise me on this.
Regards,
Niti

Hi Check Table HRUS_D2 for the user id and cross check it with the users pa record and IT 105.
Also check the email address maintained in su01. And further you can check with the org attrib forward??? is maintained.
I hope this helps.
Saj

Adobe creative Cloud photshop cs 6 register user iam not getting COPY CSS options please help

iam adobe creative cloud photshop cs 6 register user iam not getting COPY CSS options even i have updated photoshop several times
still not getting this options please help
Thanks
Koushik

13.0.1 is the last version of Photoshop to run on Windows XP but it does not include the Copy CSS feature.
The Copy CSS feature was first introduced in Photoshop 13.1 (Cloud only) and higher.
http://blogs.adobe.com/jkost/2013/02/copy-css-attributes-in-photoshop-13-1.html
Photoshop 13.1 does not run on Windows XP. So your operating system is preventing you from upgrading Photoshop to 13.1+.
http://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/kb/new-system-requirements-photoshop-131.html
If you plan to remain a Cloud member then you will have to upgrade to Windows 7 or Windows 8 (or get a new computer) very soon in order to run Photoshop CC to be released on June 17, 2013.

Chat user is not getting message from the other users

In my application when user [A] initiate the chat with user[B] , I am facing following issues
-          User[B] is not getting initiation notification so that I am unable to open chat pod for user [A] on user[B] application
-          Due to above problem , User[B] not getting any message sent by the User[A]
-          User[A] can send only one message and it is displayed on simple chat pod
when User[A]tries to send more then one message it is not displayed on simple chat pod but on the console I can see the messages
following is sample code
public function connectChat() :void {
_collectionNode =
new CollectionNode();_collectionNode.sharedID = NOTIFICATION_COLLECTION_NODE;
_collectionNode.connectSession =
this.connectSession;_collectionNode.addEventListener(CollectionNodeEvent.SYNCHRONIZATION_CHANGE, onSynchronizationChange,
false, 0, true);_collectionNode.addEventListener(CollectionNodeEvent.ITEM_RECEIVE, onItemReceive,
false, 0, true);_collectionNode.subscribe();
/*** @private
* Handles the creation of a collection node if it does not already exist
protected function onSynchronizationChange(event:CollectionNodeEvent):void {
if (_collectionNode.isSynchronized) {
if (!_collectionNode.isNodeDefined(START_CHAT_LIST) && _collectionNode.canUserConfigure(connectSession.userManager.myUserID)) {_collectionNode.createNode(START_CHAT_LIST,
new NodeConfiguration(UserRoles.VIEWER, UserRoles.VIEWER, true, false, true,false, NodeConfiguration.STORAGE_SCHEME_QUEUE));}
public function connectChat() :void{
trace('connectChat');_collectionNode =
new CollectionNode();_collectionNode.sharedID = NOTIFICATION_COLLECTION_NODE;
_collectionNode.connectSession =
this.connectSession;_collectionNode.addEventListener(CollectionNodeEvent.SYNCHRONIZATION_CHANGE, onSynchronizationChange,
false, 0, true);_collectionNode.addEventListener(CollectionNodeEvent.ITEM_RECEIVE, onItemReceive,
false, 0, true);_collectionNode.subscribe();
/*** @private
* Handles the creation of a collection node if it does not already exist
protected function onSynchronizationChange(event:CollectionNodeEvent):void {
if (_collectionNode.isSynchronized) {
//Creates the nodes if they don't exist
if (!_collectionNode.isNodeDefined(START_CHAT_LIST) && _collectionNode.canUserConfigure(connectSession.userManager.myUserID)) {_collectionNode.createNode(START_CHAT_LIST,
new NodeConfiguration(UserRoles.VIEWER, UserRoles.VIEWER, true, false, true,false, NodeConfiguration.STORAGE_SCHEME_QUEUE));}
/*** Checks if a chat is going to be started with this specific user
protected function onItemReceive(event:CollectionNodeEvent):void {
var item:MessageItem = event.item;
var openChatEvent:OpenChatEvent = OpenChatEvent.ToOpenChatEvent( item.body, OpenChatEvent.OPEN_CHAT );
switch (item.nodeName) {
case START_CHAT_LIST:
trace("Starting Chat Notified");
if( openChatEvent.userId && openChatEvent.userId == this.connectSession.userManager.myUserID ){
this.dispatchEvent( openChatEvent );
if( this._collectionNode.isSynchronized )
this._collectionNode.retractItem( START_CHAT_LIST, openChatEvent.roomId );}
break;}
/*** Publishes a request for someone to join a chat
public function publishChatRequest(notificationEvent : NotificationEvent) :void {
if( this.connectSession.userManager.getUserDescriptor( notificationEvent.userID ) ){
var openChatEvent:OpenChatEvent = new OpenChatEvent( OpenChatEvent.PUBLISH_CHAT,null,notificationEvent.sharedID, notificationEvent.userNotificationList, null, notificationEvent.userID );
if( this.presenceUsers )openChatEvent.descriptors =
this.presenceUsers; _collectionNode.publishItem(
new MessageItem( START_CHAT_LIST, openChatEvent, openChatEvent.roomId ) );}
else{
Alert.show(
"User "+ notificationEvent.userID + " is not logged in.", "Publish Error" );}

A) are these methods copied twice in the code here on purpose?
   connectChat() and onSynchronizationChange is repeated in code due copy paste mistake
B) are both users subscribing to _collectionNode right away? Do each of them
get to onSynchronizationChange?
   Yes , each of them get to onSynchronizationChange
C) If you put a breakpoint in onSynchronizationChange, do you see the node
get created? Do you see it in the dev console?
Yes , it is creating a node
D) Is user B receiving an onItemReceive at all? Is user A?
Yes , it is creating a node
Now both the user getting chat message, have following issue
When user A initiate the chat with user B this action is not opening chat pod / window on user B end which shows user A has initiated chat with user B
But when user B click on user A name to initiate the chat, this action opens a chat window and user B can see message send by user A
Above scenario is not normal chat behavior in which other user gets the notification of chat . what could be the problem

Cisco Flex Connect and users can not get IP Address by WAN

Hello my name is Ivan
I have a wlc 5508 with license base to 50 aps, i use a deployment flex connect. I already registered all my access points, I use web authentication to authenticate users guest, and the service dhcp is in the central site.
My issue is the users in each remote site, can not get an ip address by dhcp from the central site, they can authenticate in the guest ssid, but any users can not get an ip.
The request is passing by the wan in this way
Central Site DHCP - Router WAN - Remote Site - Users with notebooks. I use flex connect central deployment (all the traffic consulting to the wlc) .
perhaps i should use local deploy? The wlc is in the central site.
Can you help me to resolving this issue please? , perhaps any advice?
Regards
Ivan.

Thanks Osita
If I configure Central Authentication and I configure central switching I need to create a dynamic interafce for each remote site and each dynamic interface associated with a different VLAN ID, because I can not associate a single interface dynamic to the same VLAN ID, but in my case the client remote in each remote site have the same network segment with the same VLAN ID with the same SSID for guests. My goal is to configure web authentication with the local DHCP server at each remote site, will this work?.Each remote site have its own server dhcp.
If I configure authentication central authentication with central switching with web authenticacion as I set in my scenario?
My issues are the interfaces dynamics, because I have the same network to the customer guest with the same ID VLan in each remote site
Regards

Urgent help? for Standalone AP users are not getting ip addresses

Dear friends,
i have Cisco LAP1140 series access points and i wanted to use them as autonomous , so i converted their ios from light weight to autonomous to
c1140-k9w7-tar.124-25d.JA image.
my network senario is
CORE SW + Access SW + Access points
Core SW:
act as a dhcp server for wireless user
for WLAN vlan 16 is configured on it
configured dhcp pool here for vlan 16
Access SW:
access points are cooneted with it
and every switch port assign to vlan 16 that is connected to AP
Standalone Access Points:
connected to access switch and have assigned static management IPs from vlan 16 that i have excluded in DHCP Pool in core switch.
configure only one ssid and broadcast
both radio 5ghz and 4.2 ghz are up
i can ping the gateway from each Access point to core switch
but the users can not get the ip address from the ssid that is configured on APs.
below is the attached of configuration of the access point
please review the configuration and advise me where i have mistaken and what i have missing in the configuration?
please reply me ASAP because this is very urdent for me and your reply is very important for me
Thanks

Thanks for your reply Ven
actually i did not check that and it does make sence too may be problem with DHCP Scope
but you know why i did not check because there is an other scope on the core switch for Data users only the difference
of vlan numbers and names
but that data vlan users are getting ip addresses and connect normally to internet.
did you view the configuration that i attached with my 1st post?
if no please view it and advise me if i have any missing there.
further i ll check for DHCP in the morning to connect my laptop dirct with switch port to is that getting ip address or no.
Thanks

Partner roles not getting copied from customer.

Hi ,
Partner Roles not getting copied from customer to delivery Document .
we have created one delivery document from a purchase order and when trying to create billing document from that delivery document it is giving log "payer" and ' Bill to party " not maintained.
when checked in partner tab in delivery document these partner roles are not present there . so what can be the probable reason . These partner functions are maintained in customer.
thanks!!!!!!
which customizing seeting to check for this

Hello Payal,
Please go to T.code VOPA i.e. Maintain Partner Determination and select Delivery from the list and then click Partner Procedurers and select the relevant delivery type and double click you will get mandatory Partner Functions like Sold To, ship To, Bill to are ticked or not.
Reward if useful

LAN was down ie Users are not getting ip from DHCP server after enabling DHCP snooping

Hi All ,
Enclosed file has network connectivity diagram.
1. L3 vlan's ie 2,3,4,5 and 6 are configured on ACC-CR1 and ACC-CR2.
2.Trunk is configured between Core switches ( CR1 and CR2) and access switches .VTP mode is transparent on all switches.L2 vlans are configured on all access switches.
3.DHCP is server is located at different location and is reachable over MPLS.
Without enabling dhcp snooping , users connected to access switches (Sw1,sw2,sw3 and Sw4 ) are getting ip address from DHCP server without any problem and everything is working fine.
But users connected to Sw3 and Sw4 are getting ip address from rouge DHCP server which is not pingable from any one of the switch.
So we have configured DHCP snooping for all vlan's on CR1 , CR2 , SW3 and SW4 and "trusted uplink ports" which are connected to WAN routers from CR1 and CR2 and also "trusted uplink ports " of Sw3 and Sw4 which are connected to CR1 and CR2.
As soon we have enabled DHCP snooping and trusted respective uplink ports , users are not getting ip address from remote DHCP server and even users connected to Sw1 and SW2 are facing same issue.
Note : DHCP snooping is not configured on SW1 and SW2.
Why users are not getting ip address from remote DHCP server as soon as we enabled dhcp snooping on Core switches and two access switches ie sw3 and sw4 ? what could have caused DHCP packets to be dropped ? Any idea would be appreciated .

Hi,
as you say: " HSRP is configured between CR1 and CR2 and Vlans are active on CR1" does it mean there are L3 intrefaces configured in each VLAN on your CR switches and ip hepler-address pointing to the remote DHCP server is configured on each of them?
I know it's difficult in a productive environment but IMHO you need to find out where are the DHCP offers dropped.
Either by enabling DHCP debugging or by capturing packets via Wireshark, e.g.
Best regards,
Milan

Roles not getting assigned to User OIM11gR2

Hi Experts,
I have created a Role, Access policy for ACF2 and a rule for automatically provision Users whose Company Code = 200 (company code is a UDF)
The records are getting provisioned if I assign the role manually to the user and run Evaluate user Policies task. But if i reconcile the user from trusted resource, the users with company code are not getting even the role assigned to them.
Am i missing something. Please help me out!!

hi,
have you run the configuration wizard?
http://yourhost:port/nwa/cfg-wizard
there is a task for BPM. just execute it.
if you have already run the wizard, you can go to following place to check and make further change if required.
http://yourhost:port/nwa/sys-config
select "Applications" tab
put "bpembaseear" in the name filter, select that application in the result table
you will see the properties tab
if your locale is not there, you can fix now.
Best regards,
John

Roles Not Getting assigned during trusted reconn in OIM 11gR2

Hi Experts,
I have created a Role, Access policy for ACF2 and a rule for automatically provision Users whose Company Code = 200 (company code is a UDF)
The records are getting provisioned if I assign the role manually to the user and run Evaluate user Policies task. But if i reconcile the user from trusted resource, the users with company code are not getting even the role assigned to them.
Am i missing something. Please help me out!!

I followed the exact same steps to create the rule,
Search your Role > Select Your Role > Detail will be opened > Members Tab > Right top Corner > Add Rule > Select your condition
I even tried with User Type = Consultant etc with some OOTB attributes but still no luck
Once the recon is complete and user is created in OIM, i don't see the role added to user. Now, if i open the role again and edit the rule and navigate to preview results tab I see the newly created user listed in preview, and if I click Save without any changes, user gets added to the role.
I think this could be due to our custom event handler as mentioned by NN, please let me know if you have any other clue to debug this issue.

New user creation in AE- user group not getting assigned

Hi All,
Here is a typical case, wherein when we create a new user with AE for the production system, the user gets created and the roles are also assigned but the user group is not getting assigned. The user group is being fetched from a table from the backend and all that is working fine. Infact in order to test the configurations we even created a new user in the production instance of AE giving the development system as the target system for user creation and in this case the user was successfully created and the user group is also assigned. The problem is arising only when the target system is production system.
Connectors are all working fine, but we are unable to think of a reason. Can somebody help us on this?

Hi Vani,
If you are provisioning the user group using user defaults, check that production system is selected in the user defaults configured. Configuration -> user defaults. You can define any user default system, but for perticuticular user defaults that is applicable define all the systems, in which you want user defaults to be provisioned.
Kind Regards,
Srinivasan

User can not get work item

I created a demo workflow template with 2 userdecisions. The agent of the 1st is myself, and the agent of the other is another user USR001. Their possible agents are set general. I executed the workflow and found I could get the workitem in my inbox and approved, but USR001 can not get his workitem then. I checked the workflow log and found the agent USR001 get the item in the AGENTS icon. But in the grahical log, I found the status of the 2nd userdecision is 'READY' and (NO AGENT). Both of the two user (me and USR001) have SAP_ALL authorization. Then I logged on by another user and found the same problem: the user can only get the workitem of himself . And there is no error in the STEP HISTORY in technical details.
So I have the following questions:
1 Are there any configuration missed in the system?
2 I want to know whether there are some documents about the basic configuration of workflow, such as assignment of the USER ROLE, necessary confuguration for development and use of workflow.
Thanks!~

Hello,
You say:
"I checked the workflow log and found the agent USR001 get the item in the AGENTS icon. But in the grahical log, I found the status of the 2nd userdecision is 'READY' and (NO AGENT). "
READY and NO AGENT just means that no agent has executed the step yet. Click on the Agents icon to see which agents it has been sent to.
regards
Rick Bakker
Hanabi Technology

Users details not getting populated in the portal tables..

Hi,
We have implemented single sign on (SSO) and we do not create users in the portal as user/pwd come from OID.
Now becoz of this the portal tables are not getting populated.I require that all the users of the OID to be populated in the portal tables. How can I do it.I depserately require it.

You can use the function wwsec_api.activate_portal_user to create the shadow records in the portal repository.
Ref. : http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/ias/portal/html/plsqldoc/pldoc1014/wwsec_api.html

Restrict user could not get output of conc request more than one

Hi all,
I actually have one scenario that I want to delete or purge concurrent requests after getting view output. Please tell me how it is possible to purge request , Its simple means to prohibit the user to
see out 2nd time.
"I have one option that May be I use personalization , when user click on view output button , after populating file
code delete request from concurrent request table."
Thanks

user9275313 wrote:
Hi Sirini,
We have its solution already, when user click on view output then this directly go to printer, user can not view output, But I prevent here user he can click only one time against one request, the second time when he click of that button either it goes disable or that request purg in first click from the table.
ThanksThere are several obvious issues that come to mind -
1. If the user cannot view the output but can only print it, then the only way he/she can verify that it is the correct output is after printing it - seems to be a possible waste of paper.
2. What if the printer jams (or runs out of ink etc etc) when printing the output ? What is the option to print a second time ?
HTH
Srini

WebCenter user role not getting propagated

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for