Work order settled without functional area

Hello All,
We are getting an issue here, business is trying to settle a workorder by posting it through KO8G.
When the posting is done we cannot see the Functional area on the Debit Line (40), and the credit line has the work order, profit center and functional area. As the debit line does not have functional area, the data does not match in BI.
Could anyone please elaborate how can we get the FA on both the lines.
Thanks in Advance,
Tushar Nerlekar

When you issue inventory to service order, the journal entry is
Dr Consumption + Production Order (Functional area derived from order type)
Cr Inventory (B/S account doesn't need CO object assignment)
When the order settles, the accounting entry is:
Dr Consumption + Cost Center (Functional area derived from cost center master data)
Cr Consumption + Production Order (Functional area derived from order type)
In Iw33, check in Go To -> Settlement Rule at header level what is the settlement receiver?

Similar Messages

  • KO8G open work order settlement

    Hi,
    I am facing an issue with open work order settlement using KO8G or KO88.
    We are on 6.0 and PSM turned and New GL activated with a document splitting on fund mandatory flag turned on.
    When open work orders undergo WIP calculation through KKAI, it shows the the calculated amount in the GL account but when we execute KO88 or KO8G to settle this open work order amount to the GL, it gives me the below error
    GLT2201 "Balancing field "Fund" in line item 001 not filled"
    On debugging the KO88, its seen that the field fund does not flow in from the work order.
    This means that both my P&L accounts and my balance sheet accounts that offset the WIP posting does not have the fund field (which is a mandatory field for posting any document in the system).
    Has anyone come across such a situation?
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Pradeep
    Edited by: Pradeep Giri on May 30, 2009 4:07 AM

    Hey Vanessa,
    Sorry i have been really busy with work off late. I just got a moment and wanted to thank you for the help.
    I found a solution for it, we had FMDERIVE default the fund on the accounts used in WIP settlement as they are dedicated for those process.
    The cost is picked from the order and deposited on the P&L account which is now attached to the fund and this is further transferred to the balance sheet account with the fund information.
    Problem solved.
    Do you see any other implications on this?
    Thanks again.
    Pradeep

  • Open Work Order settlement - KO8G or KO88

    Hi,
    I am facing an issue with open work order settlement using KO8G or KO88.
    We are on 6.0 and PSM turned and New GL activated with a document splitting on fund mandatory flag turned on.
    When open work orders undergo WIP calculation through KKAI, it shows the the calculated amount in the GL account but when we execute KO88 or KO8G to settle this open work order amount to the GL, it gives me the below error
    GLT2201 "Balancing field "Fund" in line item 001 not filled"
    On debugging the KO88, its seen that the field fund does not flow in from the work order.
    This means that both my P&L accounts and my balance sheet accounts that offset the WIP posting does not have the fund field (which is a mandatory field for posting any document in the system).
    Has anyone come across such a situation?
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Pradeep

    Ashok,
    Thanks for the reply.
    We have a user exit to populate the order during its creation. this means the fund field is already residing on the order. so during settlement process, closed orders dont have a problem but when open orders are subject to settlement i.e WIP settlement, the cost on the order is not transferred to the GL account because of the fund missing as our financial statements should be balances by fund.
    Do you think an user exit can suffice this ? have you ever tried or come across such a scenario.
    Thanks
    Pradeep

  • Work order SETTLEMENT RULE Error

    Workflow Work order SETTLEMENT RULE Error, but settlement is done no problem in updation. But notification error there.
    Notification of completion cannot be generated
    Problems occurred when generating a mail
    Error '9' when calling service 'SO_OBJECT_SEND'
    Error handling for work item 000112476185
    Work item 000112476185: Object 000020154849 method UPDATESETTLEMENTRULE cannot be executed
    Call transaction was canceled.
    No errors occurred -> Details in long text
    No errors occurred -> Details in long text
    Please advice what could be the reason this error.
    Best Regards,
    Prabhakar

    Message no. WL821
    Message no. FD009
    Message no. WL863
    Problems occurred when generating a mail
    Message no. SWF_RUN534
    Error handling for work item 000133673828
    Message no. SWF_RUN630
    Error '9' when calling service 'SO_OBJECT_SEND'
    Message no. SWF_RUN535
    Thanks,
    Prabhakar

  • Defaulting G/L account in work order settlement rule

    Hello,
    I have set my work order settlement profile, the default object to be G/L.  However, in the equipment master record, at the Organization tab (account assignment group), i don't see any field for G/L account.
    When i create settlement rule with default, i get error that rule cannot be created with default.
    Where can i enter the G/L account in the equipment master to enable the auto settlement rule creation?

    you can always explain the concept of FI account through Cost Center and CO account through Cost Element from Plant Maintenance and FI/CO organisation point of view and in relation to business process.
    As you cant define in master data you cant get it automatically copied into settlement rule and hence have to maintain it manually as system dont know which GL to use as settlement receiver as not maintained in master data.

  • Reverse work order settlements

    Experts,
    I need to reverse all the work order settlements that were done in a month due to some error - Appreciate it if someone can let me know how to take care of this.
    All answers/inputs/thoughts will be duly appreciated and rewarded with points.
    Thanks,
    Nandita

    KO8G

  • Process Order Settlement without GR or GI

    Hello,
    I have a quick question that I need help with please. A process order has no Goods Receipt yet (only consumption) as of month-end when we settle all orders. Will such an order settle and post an entry to GL even though it is not completed yet?
    Also, if an order has Goods Receipt but no consumption (I know it doesnt make sense, but it is an error order), will it still settle?
    Thanks,
    Gligor.

    Hi,
    If I understood correctly, you have consumptions of RM from your inventory but you dont have production GR.  You wanted to do the order settlement. 
    - Why do you want to settle order that is not completed in production?  If there are any expenses on the order during the month, shouldn't these expenses be tracked as WIP? 
    - Also, for the case where there are GR without GI, are there any activity consumptions on the process order? 
    Thanks,
    Ram

  • Work order settlement issue

    Hi
    I am not an expert in Work orders and appreciate your input.
    A work order has been settled to a Sales order ( I can't understand the logic behind settling to a Sales Order). The Profit centre assigned to the sales order is wrong. I.e. they need it to be the same as that in the work order.
    1) Is it possible to reverse the settlement and
    2) change the profit centre in the Sales order
    3) Change the settlement rule of the work order
    The user informed the reason to settle the work order is just merely to close the work order. Is it mandatory to settle the work order in order to close. If so could you please explain the logic behind the requirement?
    Thanks & Regards
    Nadini

    Hey Vanessa,
    Sorry i have been really busy with work off late. I just got a moment and wanted to thank you for the help.
    I found a solution for it, we had FMDERIVE default the fund on the accounts used in WIP settlement as they are dedicated for those process.
    The cost is picked from the order and deposited on the P&L account which is now attached to the fund and this is further transferred to the balance sheet account with the fund information.
    Problem solved.
    Do you see any other implications on this?
    Thanks again.
    Pradeep

  • Error in servcie work order Settlement

    We have tried to process the Settlement for FCOs Service Work Orders and Warranty Contracts but we get the following error message
    "Account 6810100 requires an assignment to a CO object".
    I have detected that this GL account has been created as cost element from January 2010, but as far I know the GL accounts that belong to settlement process must not be created as cost element.
    Now pls help how to resolve this problem
    Rgd
    Prakash Sharma

    Hi
    You are right ..
    I checked cost element  6810100  user made following change ,
    In cost element master from 01.01.2010  to 31.12.9999     .- Cost element category is- 1  Primary costs/cost-reducing revenues and earlier  from 01.01.2000 to  31.12.2002 Cost element category is- 22 External settlement  and also in default account assignment cost center is not assigned.
    I just want to know error is coming because default account assignment is not given  and also  because of  change in cost element category
    Rgd Prakash

  • Work Order Settlement Rule Determination

    Hi Experts,
    For T-code : IW32, can any one suggest any enhancements which triggers during following conditions:
    1)While Releasing the Work order.
    2)To redetemine settlement Rule i.e. I need to over wrtie a filed in Settlement rule i.e. "Setllement Reciever" with Cost center value.
    3) Overwrite the default costcenter value in Location Tab with custom field value.
    Thanks in advance,
    With regards.

    Hi Vani.
    You must use either EXIT_SAPLCOIH_009 user exit or must configure workflow (STD object ISUSMORDER) .
    Thanx
    suresh.

  • Production order settlement without materials

    Hi Gurus,
    I have a question that I am unable to find any solution :
    We create a production order without materials using CO07 and everything is ok except that the cost is now sitting in cost element. Although the settlement parameter of the order goes to cost center, finance wants it to expense off to another GL account automatically. Status of prod order is REL  PRC  NMAT SETC. Settlement rule is created with cost center as one of the settlement receiver.
    I went to t-code OBYC and found the PRD  - General Modifications PRF pointing to the GL account I wanted.
    I went to t-code FS00 (edit G/L account centrally) edit cost element, default acct assignment and was tempted to update the cost center to default the GL account to the cost center but was unsure what is the impact.
    Is there anything else that i am missing here ?
    Any help with t-codes guidance will be greatly appreciated

    In OK07 select the settlement profile, change default object type to CTR. So the settlement receiver will be cost center.
    Who is the receiver you can check in production order itself.

  • Restrict work order confirmation without activity price in KP26.

    HI Guys,
    we are maintaining the activity price in KP26 for mandays activity and confirming it in IW41. Now if activity price is not maintained in KP26, and confirming the mandays in IW41, system should through an error message. please let me know how can i do this.
    Anil Kumar. V

    Hi
    you can check the SPRO in Define Control Parameters for Completion Confirmations where you can mark the Actual cost , and Termination for incorrect act cost. where in it will through an error which confirming the same.
    If the above conditions don't met your requirement you can check the same using user exit
    Regards
    Thyagarajan

  • Work order( maintainence order)  settlement

    hi,
    i want to know whether the cost center used for settlement of work order and cost center assigned to work center are same or not. please help me with this. can anyone give some examples of scenarios.
    thanks,
    Monica

    Monica,
    <b>Settlement: Example from SAP - Help</b>
    The following example illustrates the creation and processing of an order from the point of view of order settlement.
    <b>The Order</b>
    In a clarification plant, three pumps are to be cleaned in the pumping station. All three pumps are installed at the same functional location.
    <b>Planning and Planning Data</b>
    The planner creates an order, enters the functional location C1-B01 (pumping station) as a reference object and enters the three pumps in the object list. The order is to be settled to the pumping station cost center, which has the number 511. This means that all the costs posted to the order for cleaning the three pumps will be settled to cost center 511 when the job is complete.
    The order data comprises the following:
    Data on the Performing Work Center "PSC" (pump fitters):
    <b>Entry</b>
    Number of persons performing the job : 2
    Performing cost center (= cost center of the employees performing the job): 909
    Activity type: Cleaning
    Planned number of work hours per person per pump: 1
    Cost of activity type per hour: $ 150
    Total planned work hours: 6
    Total labor costs: $ 900
    Data for Scheduled Material:
    <b>Entry</b>
    Consumption posting to the amount of: $ 150
    Releasing and Processing the Order
    Once the planning stage is complete, the planner releases the order for processing.
    The employees from work center "PSC" start the work:
    They withdraw the material scheduled for the order from the warehouse. Actual costs of $150 are incurred for the order and are debited directly from the balance sheet account.
    The employees confirm the length of time they worked on the order. It took them a little longer than planned, so that the resulting actual costs posted to the order are $1050. These costs are credited to the performing work center.
    <b>Situation After Completion of the Work</b>
    After the work has been completed and the order settled, the debits are as follows:
    Balance on the order: $ 0.00
    Debit to the receiver cost center 511 (pumping station): $ 1200.00
    Hope this gives you a fair idea as what it should be, Reward your points if this was helpful.
    Regards,
    Prasobh

  • Work order Bus area

    I have some baisc questions related to Plant mintenance work orders, equipment, functional locations and business area.
    How to check on the business areas in the functional locations and equipment masters. is there a report.
    From where would the work order get the business area information.
    How is the work order posted to FI.. just the basic process.
    Thanks
    Any material or clarification is appreciated.

    http://www.sap-img.com/sap-pm.htm

  • Work Order to cost center settlement with line item detail

    Iu2019m having difficulty finding a method to settle from a work order to a cost center with line item detail.  When an order is settled with KO88 or KO8G the total value for that work order/cost element combination is combined and posted to the cost center as a lump sum with the description of CTR\######.  Users would like to see the individual values that posted to the work order in a cost center report such as  KSB1.
    I donu2019t see anything in the settlement rule, settlement profile or allocation structure that will allow line item settlement from work order to cost center.     Is line item settlement possible when settling to a cost center?   Is there an alternate way to see these expenses as line items in KSB1?
    Thanks,
    Jeff

    Thanks Christian,
    We've defined an allocation structure that we use for Project System and Work Order settlement and have Receiver Categories established as FXA, CTR and WBS with "by Cost Element"  checked.  Work order costs do settle to the cost center entered in the settlement rule, the problem is it combines all items values as a single amount when posting to the cost center.
    For example:  
    expenses post to the work order under cost element 500000 for $500, $200, $300 and cost element 600000 for $250 and $250.  The settlement rule says to settle to cost center 170000.  When the settlement takes place cost center 170000 is debited $1000 to cost element 500000 and $500 to cost element 600000.  We would prefer to see individual posting of $500, $200, $300 to 500000  and $250, $250 to 600000.
    Thanks,
    Jeff

Maybe you are looking for