Wrong BED calcualtion in MIGO

Hello,
In my BED calcualtion, its' adding Rs. 100 in all the cases..
i don't know frm where its adding 100 rs. if any has right ans.pls revert
For ex.
Base price - 1000
BED - 14% - 140
Ed cess 2% - 2.80
Se cess 1% - 1.40... this is the normal flow, where mine is flowed like
blw;
Base price - 1000
BED - 14% - 154
Ed cess 2% - 2.80
Se cess 1% - 1.40

HI Pankaj,
I didn't maintained JEXC in m/08.. i have used tax code and rates are maintained in fv11. . In po, invoice tab, taxes are flowed correctly. The only issue is in migo it's adding Rs. 100 , what ever qty / value if i changed.. pls tell me , what else i need to check
Edited by: Mahesh J on Oct 7, 2008 7:42 AM

Similar Messages

Wrong BED is flowing to MIRO

Hi
Its related to Indian Excise,
During MIRO Basic Excise Duty calculation is wrong.That is when you click on calculate tax,the tax amount being calculated is entirely diffrent.I noticed Base amout is correct,BED is wrong(For instance 41.05% of BED is showing instead of 16%) and E cess & SHE cess values are according to BED.
I have done following analysis,fyi
1)Tax code entered in MIRO is correct(Both at header & item)
2)Correct tax code is used in PO(16%,2%,1% and 4% VAT)
3)Excise & Tax calculations in PO are correct.
4)Percentages in FTXP are correct(ie 100%,2%,1% and 4%)
5)Percentage in FV12 for BED condition type is 100%.
5)16% is maintained for that chapter id in J1ID.
Can you pls advise,where could be the problem? why the incorrect BED is flowing to MIRO?
Your inputs are highly appreciable & rewardable.
Regds

Hi Rajaram,
thanks for reply.
In J1Id i have maintained Exc rate 16% ,ECS rate 2% and AT1 1%
and below r the cond types used in tax code
JMO1 for BED
JECE - Ecess
JECH -SHE cess
JIP6 for VAT(deductible)
And pls note whatever % maintained for JMO1 in FTXP will appear in FV13,i have not maintained any % seperately in FV11.
pls advise.
regds

Trigger of BED value in MIGO

Hello Experts,
In case of excisable materials, when we carry out MIGO with excise capturing, then we input excise base value at the "Excise Item" tab at item detail. When we input that entry & check the document, BED value should be calculated automatically with Cess & SHECess, which is not happening currently in our case.
So, what is that setting, which will automatically trigger the value in BED & other fields when we input excise base amount & check the document(MIGO t-code).
Regards
Mahesh

Hi,
The Tax code u have mentioned in the purchase order should have the BED, Cess and SHcess value. Kindly check that.
Regards
Karthick

Wrong quantity posted during MIGO

Dear Forum,
During migo, quantity wrongly entered is 2.4 kg, whereas in excise entry screen for the same migo quantity entered is 2380 kg.
Accordingly value was calculated correctly and manual excise figures were entered as per JMOQ condition.
Now the question is why system is allowing two different quantity in same Migo entry. System should check this mismatch and should not allow this to happen.
Kindly let me know if there is any configuration needed for the same..
Regards
Nainesh

Hi,
Please chekc whethr rounding profile is activated in the material master configuration.
Check any conversion factors avialble.
Hope this helps .
Regards,
Smitha

Wrong depreciation calcualtion when we change useful life of an asset

Hi,
We change the useful life of an asset during the middle of the year. The deprecaiton calculation is not effecting correctly for the remaining useful life of an asset.
We are using stright line method of depreciaion. I will appreciate if any post some tips what is wrong .
Example:
Current State:
Acquisition value: 300,000
Acquisition date: 1/1/08
Useful life: 3 years
NBV 12/31/08: 200,000
NBV 6/30/09: 150,000
New life: 2 years, starting 7/1/2009
Current methodology:
NBV at 12/31/08 divided by new remaining life as of the beginning of the year (2009) $200,000 / 12 months = $16,667
Depreciation expense in 7/31/09: $66,669 ([16,667 * 7 months = 116,669] minus depreciation at old method booked for first 6 months of 2009 [200,000/24 = 8,333 * 6 = $50,000]). $116,669 u2013 50,000 = $66,669
Monthly Depreciation expense between 8/31/09-12/31/09: $16,667 / month
Future State:
Requested methodology:
NBV at 6/30/09 divided by remaining life as of the date of the change: (150,000/6mos) $25,000
Can any one explain what is the issue

Hi,
By default, any change in depreciation parameters will recalculate depreciation from the beginning. If you want to change depreciation terms on different phases, you may need to introduce a depreciation key which changes percentage in multi-level method.
Best Regards,
Madhu

Wrong Base value in MIGO

Dear All
I have created a Import PO for a EOU. All the prices in the PO is correct. But while doing MIGO Base Value in the Excise Tab is different from the PO.
Pls guide me through
Regards
JK

This is the problem with pricing procedure,
check your pricing procedure

Excise calculated at migo is wrong

hi friends.
i have maintained tax code for 8%, 2%, 1%, for bed, ecess, and secess respectively and 4% vat
the Bed calculated at migo is wrong, it is calculating little more, what is the procedure to rectify this,
please give all respective hints..
thanks in advance...

Hi,
Please check the validity period for tax conditions if you are using TAXINN procedure.

Exice wrong values in migo

Hi,
I'm geting wrong excise values during migo- excise capturing,
Base price - 1000
BED - 16% - 160
Ed cess 2% - 3.20
Se cess 1% - 1.60... this is the normal flow, where mine is flowed like
blw;
Base price - 1000
BED - 16% - 174
Ed cess 2% - 3.20
Se cess 1% - 1.60
pls tell me how to correct it..

condition record is the one possibility for this.
check the excise defaults in CIN setting i think there u have maitained the rs.14 as values colounm instead of 14% BED condition
Again check same in J1ID
the excise rates for chapter iD
regards,.
sujit

Statistical GR ( MIGO)

Hi All,
In third party process we do Statistical GR (MIGO).I want to know that how we do that.Means what is the meaning of Statistical GR ( MIGO).
Regards
Prabudh

Thanks AKPT for reply
As advised , pleae find enclosed screens for OMS2, PO and FI entry. FI entry might be wrong as while posting MIGO ..I was getting error "WE etnry is missing in table YFTFI_SUBST236 and I maintained some dummy GL accounts.
Regards
Arvind

Doubt reg: MIGO GR/IR Reclass accounting entries

Hi ,
When MIGO is done , we have the below accounting entries.
Stock a/c - Dr
GR/IR clg a/c - Cr
On month end when we run F.19 , if MIGO is done and MIRO is not done,
the accounting entry is
GR/IR Adjustment a/c DR
GR/IR clg a/c - Cr
Is this correct?
Because the purpose of running F.19 is to reclassify the balances in GR/IR clg a/c to
GR/IR Adjustment a/c.
But as per the above entries, the GR/IR clg a/c, is credited twice.
Please explain, where I am getting the flow wrong.

Hi Rudra,
When MIGO is done , the below accounting entry is posted
Stock a/c - Dr
GR/IR clg a/c - Cr
Now, when you run F.19, then, based on whether the MIGO is done and IR is not done and IR is done but MIGO is not done, the entries would get posted.
Please remember, the entries are only mirror entries of GR/IR Account and no posting is made to GR/IR Account.
Note the scheme of entries below:-
Delivered but Not Invoiced:-
GR/IR Adjustment A/C..Dr
To Provision Account (GNB)
Invoiced but not yet Delivered:-
Claims A/C...Dr(BNG)
To GR/IR Adjustment A/c
The GR/IR Adjustment Account and GR/IR Account can be clubbed together in the FSV, so the effect gets nullified.. and the actual Claim or liability is shown in the specific GL's like provision (GNB) and Claims(BNG).
The entries also gets reversed the next month.. so this reclassification is for reporting purpose only. And then it is business as usual..
Hope this helps you..
Regards,
SAPFICO

Wrong Profit Center

Hi,
In Material Master, the Profit Center was wrongly put.
The MIGO & MIRO for the same Material is also done.
In MM02, I am able to change the Profit Center.
What all changes need to be done for the same along with chaging the Profit Center thru MM02.
Regards,

Hi PK
as sachin said if it is not possible to have new profit center attached to already posted accounting and material document. for that you have revese the cycle that is reverse invoice and cancel Gr and then proceed again.
as far as settings are concern as you have already changed the profit center in the MM02 without error that means config settings are ok.
regards
Yogesh

How to control serial no in MIGO Screen?

Hi Abapers ,
I have problem for the receiving the goods in migo screen . But user can change the serial number. but I don't want to change the serial number. in MIGO Screen.
is there any user exit OR enhancement of MIGO Screen?..
i will give reward points. this fvery urgent.....
thanks
regards,
s.muthu.
Edited by: Subramaniyan Marimuthu on May 28, 2008 10:06 AM

Hi Suyong,
I talking about migo screen when u goods receive based on production order, it will show the seperate tab screen for serial number.
That screen user can change the serial number. But I don't want to change the serial number.
how do i control when user give wrong serial number in migo screen?.
please explain me.
Thanks
regards,
s.muthu

Stock is increased and FI entry is posted in statistical GR for third party

Hello
I was trying to activate the functionalty for statistical GR in third party but STUCK due to following issues. For enabling this functionaltity I have checked "Goods Reciept" and "GR Non-Valuated" check in "Delivery tab" of PO.
1. After creating Statistical GR through MIGO (101), stock has been posted in plant. I was expecting no movement in Stock .
2. I was hoping there should not be in FI posting but FI entry is posted through statistical GR .
We are using third party process from many years but without statistical GR. Requirement from client is to post statistical GR without FI entry and no stock should be updated. Please advise if anyone has idea on this.
FYI--We have item category TAS and schedule line category CS in customisation. Also advise if above two settings in PO are enought to turn ON the statistical GR functionality.
Thanks for your help.
Regards
Arvind

Thanks AKPT for reply
As advised , pleae find enclosed screens for OMS2, PO and FI entry. FI entry might be wrong as while posting MIGO ..I was getting error "WE etnry is missing in table YFTFI_SUBST236 and I maintained some dummy GL accounts.
Regards
Arvind

TAXINJ MIRO PROBLEM

dear all
i am using TAXINJ procedure, now in MIRO the tax amount is calculating wrong, can any one help me.
i.e for the first line item it is ok when we are posting the second line or so on item the tax amount is calculating wrong,but in the MIGO the excise amount is calculting the correct and posting also ok
any note i have to apply to solve this problem, is yes pl give me the note number
regards
Jayareddy.p

hi
go to miro
her give po no
then let the system to calculate the values
go to tax tab in header level and check which tax code system is using
then for that tax code check FTXP and also the condition records in MEK1
regards
kunal

Excise value 200%

Hi experts!!!
PO is capturing 200% BED value, during MIGO process. I have checked every thing, CONDITION, J1ID. Pl give some inputs.
regards
kapil

Vishal - There are atleast 6-10 conditions are being applicable. Which should i need to check.
Charu - I have maintained J1ID. But I have got another input that i have applied conditions of Imports, instead of domestic vendor.
Does this make any sense?
thanks in adavnce
kapil

Wrong BED calcualtion in MIGO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for