Wrongly Stock issued & difference posting with CENVAT transaction

Hi all,
The user has made the wrong entry by issuing more stock for example Qty. 400 in the month April 2007 but he has not verified physically & with system, now after January 2008 he has verified the difference that Physically he has found Qty.1000 but in system Qty. 600. For this I have suggested to go for Physical inventory difference posts that he has found 400 Qty. more since it was wrong entry in April 2007.
But in this case how to consider the Excise duty transaction since he is posting the difference of 400 Qty. after 6 months.
Kindly let me know the solution if anybody experienced the same.
regards,
Dhanu

Hi Dhanu,
There are 2 types of costs involved in procurement.
1.Material cost(all costs + direct taxes)
2.Non Material costs(Dedectable Taxes) like Excise.
So, clearly the company which is going to procured should pay that Excise amount to that concerned vendor.
If u find more qty, u can post in Phy.Inv.doc.
Then where is need of concerning of Excise ..!!!
Regards

Similar Messages

Data inconsistency: posting with restricted transaction type (FAA_POST047)

Hi colleagues!
I have the following error:
Data inconsistency: posting with restricted transaction type
Message no. FAA_POST047
Diagnosis
You are trying to post in company code 1000 with transaction type 130 in ledger group 0N. According to table TABWA, this transaction type is limited. Nonetheless, according to your entries, you want to post to area 11.
System Response
Using limited transaction types is obsolete and would lead to an inconsistent posting in this situation. The system rejects the posting.
Procedure
Use a transaction type that is not limited. And, if possible, choose the ledger group and/or depreciation area on the initial screen.
According to specific accounting we shouldn't post to one of the depr. area, so most of the tr.types are restricted to post to all areas except this one.
Because of this, posting from MM with acc.assignment 'A' is impossible - I have this error.
Any ideas how to solve?
Thanks in advance

Hi Anton
This looks like your transaction type -130 is limited to post only in ledger group-0N as per the transaction type configuration. Due to which system is unable to post all the ledgers and hence this lead to inconsistency.
Please verify the transaction type 130- in configuration T code - OAYA and see if it is restricted by depreciation area (eventually allow to post only ledger group- 0N.
Tcode - OAYA (Limit Transaction Types to Depreciation Areas)
please verify and let us know the update. hope this helps
Best Regards
Jomon

Posting with clearing transaction

Hello,
I wanted to understand what exactly is posting with clearing transaction about ( viz. FB05) , it lists multiple option s on the screen , especially transfer posting with clearing.
Kindly let me know.
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
For your clear understanding, Please go through the below link
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/01/a9bc23455711d182b40000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Assign points if useful
Thanks & Regards,
Lakshmi Ranga

Pricing issue - When posting with inbound delivery VL32N

Hi Experts,
Here is the present situation. We have no info records maintained for the precious metals . Base price comes from contract and market price comes from the condition record maintained in MEK1. There is a link between PO and condition record created.
We are doing inbound delivery for the items where our present design was to have the same date populated in delivery date field and actual GR date field. This way the price of the item is determined on the day when the item was actually delivered from the condition table maintained and posted on that day that might be only past last month assuming periods well be open.When PGR was done the actual GRdate picks up the right price from the condition record.
Issue is that insted of actual GR date the inbound delivery VL31N / VL32N progam should look at delivery date and get the right price from the condition record insted of actual GR DATE when PGR is done. Since the actual GR date is the posting date Finace has decided to closethe previous months periods and so it is a problem. We have to keep the Actual GR date as present date and delivery date should get the price for that day when item was physically delivered in past.
I have tried looking at pricing procedure and condition types but was not able to get any success. Please advise how to resolve this issue.
Thanks in advance.
Edited by: Born-Legacy on Jan 15, 2012 7:54 PM

Hi,
Just a couple of ideas - not sure if they can achieve what you need.
There's a field in the contract, called "Pr. date category", EKPO-MEPRF. It controls which date shall be used for pricing. This field is copied over to the PO together with the pricing conditions. The value 2 to the best of my understanding means the "delivery date in the PO". Can you make the delivery date in the PO to be the same as the delivery date in the inb. delivery?
If not, you might be able to use an own developed formula in the pricing procedure, column "CalcType" (V_T683S-KOFRM).
BR
Raf

Distributing Price Differences posted with MIRO to production orders

Dear guru ,
I know DUV that distribute consumption differences from a physical inventory to production orders.
After the production order consumptions (mvt. Type 261) for these materials we posted the prices differences with MIRO between the purchase order price and the invoice.
Does exist a tool like DUV (or other) in order to distribute these differences in price to the production orders that have consumed these materials ?
Thanks in advance

To me it looks like the material ledger is the standard tool for doing what you want to do (although it doesn't actually post price differences from purchases to production order but rather distributes them to the receiving materials on the level of the actual price calculation)

Why use AB doc type with F-04 Post with Clearing Transaction

I am following a script for the F-04 command and it specifies the doc type as AB in the header? Why would you use AB in this case?

Hi Hari Nair Junior,
It's an accounting document type and this document type is general compared with other document type. But then, u also can use GC document type.
Hope this will solve your issue.
TQ
Regards,
Nazrul

No Stock Issue before stock entry date

Hi,
We want to put a check that when quality passing is done on a particular date say 25.03.2010, no issue can be made before this date. Presently, it is assuming the same month and is allowing to issue even on 01.03.2010.
Pl help
Regards
Mudit Gupta

As you already know, SAP only checks if there is enough stock in the month.
If you want check whether there was stock at a certain date, then you have to program this check yourself in a userexit for the movement (Enhancement MBCF0002 )
But think about the performance ... as each movement will then go thru this userexit, and a calcualation of daily stock means that you have to read movements, which is (or becomes) a huge table)
The question I would ask is: Who is doing his job wrong?
Does QM post much too late after the fact and the goods issue is done with the correct date?
or does the person who enteres the goods issue just post with a fake date?
Assume QM is late, do you really want force the other posters to enter a fake date then?

Post with Reference

Is there a way to configure the post with reference transaction FBR2 to automatically populate any of the header fields with the original referenced Document Number? I am not referring to the reference key field which uses the new Document Number as part of its string but the actual originating Document used to create the new Document.

Hello,
There is possibility of automatic filling up of the original document.
However, in a forceful way, you can make text and reference field and mandatory in OBA7 for document type and ask the user the enter the same in the reference field.
Regards,
Ravi

Fixing transactions posted with the wrong currency rate.

Looking for the best solution to fix transactions that have been posted with the wrong currency rate. Transactions with System Currency (SC) and Local Curency (LC) have been posted with the wrong exchange rate. I am looking for best practice to corect each transactions. I have noticed and tested the "Conversion Difference" feature in SBO. This feature does help me change the exchange rate between SC and LC but for an the account balance on a certain date. I am looking to change all transactions from Jan01 to Jan 31 for all GL accounts. Is there a feature to do this?? You help is greatly appreciated,

I don't think there are any options to FIX this problem by out of the box function. Because all financial transactions have been entered to the system already, you have to reverse all of them and repost those transactions with the right exchange rate. No shortcut available.
Thanks,
Gordon

Stock Issue/Receipt Values in 0IC_C03 not matchin with MC.9

Hi Experts,
We are facing a certain mismatch problem in our Inventory Cube
(0IC_C03) stock issue and receipt values. They are showing a huge
difference with the issue and receipt values in ECC Report MC.9.
Also please note that the Quantities in the cube are matching exactly
with MC.9 but not values.
On further search , we also noted that the Plant wise Values and
quantities in BW are exactly matching with certain infostructures
(S031, S033) but not with MC.9 in ECC Production.
Can anyone please let us know how can we check the plant wise
issue/Receipt values ?
Also, We replicated the same senario in Quality system and did an
inventory
cube Reload . But it still showed the same discrepencies from MC.9 for the given material and period.
Regards

Dear AL,
There is not failed request and the cube, and the loading is correct.
Also we replicated the same on Quality, and did a complete Reload for the cube and it still gave the same difference.
Kindly let me know how can we check the issue and recept values from PSA of Revaluations Extractor??
Dear Shashank,
We are using standard logistics extractor 2LIS_03_UM for the cube.
Along with 2LIS_03_BX & 2LIS_03_BF.
Regards,
Edited by: BhaminiJ on Aug 3, 2011 1:33 PM

Posting with transaction type 160 is not possible at MR8M

MODERATOR: Do not post (or request) email address or links to copyrighted or confidential information on these forums. If you do, the thread will be LOCKED and all points UNASSIGNED. If you have some information, please consider posting it to the [Wiki|https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPFI/Home] rather than sharing via email. Thank you for your assistance.
Hi All,
We raised a PO w.r.t CWIP asset and posted GRN (MIGO - Transaction typr:100) and Invoice (MIRO).
Here, Invoice posted wrongly, So we are trying to reverse the invoice with MR8M (which is posted thru MIRO).
But system populating one message as per the following:
Posting with transaction type 160 is not possible here, see long text
Message no. AAPO 177
Diagnosis:
Transaction type 160 has a depreciation limitation, although posting is not mandatory in all of the depreciation areas entered However, it is not possible to select depreciation areas in the current transactions.
Procedure:
Check the specification of transaction type 160 or use transaction MR8M to enter the transaction
Please help
Sairavi
kumarfi9gmailcom

Welcome to the forum.
As a newbie you should understand the forum rules where you are not suppose to post any basic or repeated question. To avoid this, you should make a search here
[Forum Search|http://forums.sdn.sap.com/search!default.jspa?objID=f327]
Type the same error text in Search Terms so that you will find the solution.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Problem with MIRO Transaction while posting Un planned Delivery cost

Hi all,
We have entered all the details including unplanned delivery cost in transaction MIRO. When we are trying to post the same by using post button directly with out simulation, system is asking for plant details.
For first time we have entered wrong Plant details , system immediately asking again for plant details.
Next time even if we entered correct plant details, the system is coming out from the screen MIRO and it is not posting the document.
If you go through simulate button and it is working fine and it is giving Warning message, If we enter the wrong Plant details.
My Client requirement is If we post the MIRO transaction including Un planned delivery cost with Post button. If we enter wrong plant details. System will through Error message, until we enter the correct plant details.
Is there any way to do this. Pl help me in this regard.
Regards,
Ramesh

In the MIRO T Code, U can see PO reference tab is there, Just below it there is Purchase order/scheduling agreement field is there . enter the purchase order number in blank field next to Purchase order/scheduling agreement and press enter. U can see it will take the required data automatically.
hope this helps
regards

Transaction code: 9KE0 - Posting with Dummy profit center

Hi All,
We have an issue with transation 9KE0, While posting any adjustment entries with single line item, system automaticaly creating second line item few times. We were unable to find the reason why it is creating second line for few documents?
Our requirement is that those entries should have only one line item in transaction 9KE0. Most of the cases we were able to post the document with single line item.
We are using almost 100 co.codes for our client.
For ex: if we post one entry in co.code 1000 through transaction 9KE0 with single item, system posting with one lineitem.
But some times for the same co.code with same parameters if we post one line item, second line item automatically creating with dummy profit center while posting.
Please let us know why the system is creating two line items.
Awaiting for your replies.
Thanks in Advance
Prasad
Edited by: prasad naga on Feb 22, 2011 2:53 PM

Hi,
We have further analyzed this issue and found that, whenever the amount in field(KSL -Amount in profit center local currency) is ZERO, System it is creating second line item with dummy profit center.
ex:1
proft cenert        account         amount in co.code cur    amount in profit center local currency
9999                    100000             - 0.13                                 00
dummy                 100010               0.13                                 00
ex:2
proft cenert        account         amount in co.code cur    amount in profit center local currency
9999                    100000             - 3.13                                 1
we have verified the values in GLPCA table also... whenever the tech field KSL-Amount in profit center local currency is zero system creating two line items.
Please suggest us is there a solution to stop the second line item even the amount in profit center local currency field (Tech name -KSL) is Zero
Awaiting for your suggestions.
Thanks in advance
Prasad

2 issues with call transaction to LS24

Hello All,
There are 2 issues with call transaction to LS24.
<b>1) It doesn't take batch value and displays stock for all batches.
2) When you go back, it doesn't go back to the calling program.</b>
Any thoughts ?
<u>Here is my code:</u>
PARAMETERS: p_lgnum TYPE lgnum,
            p_matnr TYPE matnr,
            p_werks TYPE werks_d,
            p_lgort TYPE lgort_d,
            p_charg TYPE charg_d.
START-OF-SELECTION.
END-OF-SELECTION.
PERFORM display_stock_per_batch.
*&      Form DISPLAY_STOCK_PER_BATCH
FORM display_stock_per_batch .
SET PARAMETER ID 'LGN' FIELD p_lgnum.
SET PARAMETER ID 'MAT' FIELD p_matnr.
SET PARAMETER ID 'WRK' FIELD p_werks.
SET PARAMETER ID 'LAG' FIELD p_lgort.
SET PARAMETER ID 'CHA' FIELD p_charg.
CALL TRANSACTION 'LS24' AND SKIP FIRST SCREEN.
ENDFORM.                    " DISPLAY_STOCK_PER_BATCH

hello
use this code
perform bdc_dynpro      using 'SAPML01S' '0209'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_CURSOR'
                              'RL01S-CHARG'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_OKCODE'
                              '/00'.
perform bdc_field       using 'RL01S-LGNUM'
                              p_lgnum.
perform bdc_field       using 'RL01S-MATNR'
                              p_matnr.
perform bdc_field       using 'RL01S-WERKS'
                              p_werks.
perform bdc_field       using 'RL01S-LGORT'
                              p_lgort.
perform bdc_field       using 'RL01S-BESTQ'
perform bdc_field       using 'RL01S-SOBKZ'
perform bdc_field       using 'RL01S-CHARG'
                              p_charg.
perform bdc_dynpro      using 'SAPML01S' '0209'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_OKCODE'
                              '/EBACK'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_CURSOR'
                              'RL01S-LGNUM'.
perform bdc_transaction using 'LS24'.
may be it will help u

F-04 Post with clearing - Document Splitting issue

Hi Guru,
In the system I have implemented the document splitting by Profit Centre and Segment.
I'm trying to post an Incoming Payment (Tcode F-04) with clearing related to two customer.
During the invoices I inserted two different Profit Centre by customer invoice.
When I post, in one document, the incoming payment related to the two invoices I don't insert the Profit Centre values manually, but I link the payment to the customer invoices to be cleared.
The system is not able to derive the Profit Centre inserted in the customer invoice in the incoming payment posting! I cannot post it neither manually because, rightly, I can insert the Profit Centre only for the Bank accounts and not for the Customer account.
How can I derive the Profit Centre from the customer invoices?
Let me know.
Thanks
Ciao

Hi Ciao,
Just post your incoming payment with the transaction.
F-02 Bank dr.
Customer cr.
and then try to clear the document with F-04.
might help you.................
Chintan Joshi.

Wrongly Stock issued & difference posting with CENVAT transaction

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for