AAM showing incorrect status for Lightroom installation.

I had LR 4.3 installed. I had received a notice in app that 4.4 was available. Since this application had been installed via the AAM under my Cloud Membership, I was expecting to receive a message from the AAM that there was an update available. However, when I launched the AAM software, it said that my LR was up to date and was using 4.4. I double checked my LR install and it was indeed 4.3 and was looking for me to update to 4.4.
Since all of this is supposed to occure through AAM, I uninstalled my LR using the control panel. I have reopened AAM and it still says that LR 4.4 is installed. I have rebooted and it still says that LR 4.4 is installed. It does not give me the option to install. So, I am now at a loss. What do I do to get LR reinstalled under my Cloud Account, and in a manner that it will update via the AAM instead of in app?

Run the Creative Suite Cleaner Tool, try again.
Mylenium

Similar Messages

After CC packager created installer for Lightroom, Installer does not install

I created an installer for Lightroom (windows) using the CC packager. When I tested it it did not install Lightroom. I tried the 32bit version and the 64bit version and they both did the samething. Is there a problem with creating the Lightroom installer?

Far out, I have been suffering from the same issue! I have tried on multiple machines to install Lightroom CCP pacakge! When running the setup.exe for other packages it will actually install the application and display a desktop icon / program files entry. I have wasted hours trying to figure out why Lightroom wasn't installing even tho event logs said successful! How is there no official documentation from Adobe that this is the expected behaviour for Lightroom manual installs?
Sure the documentation says run setup.exe then exceptions installer, my thoughts were why bother with exception installer if the main package has not installed correctly! It should mention the program won't appear until exceptions have been installed?
Thanks for creating this thread DeltaCollege! And thanks for the resolution Romsinha!

Process chain status shows incorrect status

When ever i receive bad data requests from R/3, BW pulls the error requests into a separate PSA and pass-thru the good once in another PSA and then into datatarget.
However the overall status is green for the job/package and the package when executed in ProcessChain does not show an errors. But the errors are not noticed until user notices it in the qyuery.
How to capture such errors and notified, is their any automation possible? I have setup e-mail on process chain failures but these kind of errors are not captured because the overall status of request is GREEN.
Here is the status on infopackage.
Incorrect data records - error requests (total status GREEN)
Diagnosis
Data records were recognized as incorrect.
System response
The valid records were updated in the data target and can be used in reporting.
The incorrect records were not written to the data target, but were posted retractively under a new request number in the PSA.
Procedure
Check the data in the error requests, correct the errors, and post the error requests.

Hi Gopikrishna,
Please check if "Error Handling" in the Update Tab of your Infopackage has been enabled, I guess it is.
If this has been enabled , then the error recs will be isolated and only the Correct records will be posted into the Data Target. It is the responsibility of the BW Administrator to identify such errored records, correct them and Post it back to the DAta target. Because error handling is used, the Monitor will show Green, as all the error recs have been separated.
To avoid this, you have to remove Error Handling from the INfopackage, then you will see the Load failing and the Process Step in the process chain would turn RED with the corresponding error messages.
Regards,
Praveen.

How to show the status for all CPU? Solaris 9 & 10 can support how many CPU

Hi, may i know wat is the command to show all of the CPU status? i tried use "top" command, but could show all. Any Idea?
And somemore, may I know Solaris 9 and 10 can support how many CPUs?
thanks
regards
raymond

What do you mean all of the CPU status?
top shows you processes on all processors and for the currently running processes, it shows you which CPU a process is on.
If you want separate stats for each processor, "mpstat 5" shows cpu usage and idle etc.
As far as how many CPU's solaris supports.
The largest machine Sun sells as far as I am aware is a E25K with 72 dual core CPU's
for 144 cores. Is that big enough for you? You probably don't want to know the price though :-).

Workflow Analyzer shows unknown status for workflows and trace disabled

Some servers monitored by SCOM are affected by the issue where I cannot trace workflows with Analyzer. Statuses are showing as unknown, trace is disabled. If an agent cache is flushed and health service is restarted it works for a first session showing only
some IIS workflows.
Can it be fixed somehow?
Guntars Svilpe

<ProbeActionModuleType ID="Microsoft.SystemCenter.GetWorkflowsReportProbe" Comment="requests list of running or failed workflows for management group/instance" Accessibility="Public" Batching="false" PassThrough="false">
<Configuration><xsd:element name="ManagementGroupId" type="xsd:string" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" /><xsd:element name="ManagedEntityId" type="xsd:string" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
/><xsd:element name="Status" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"><xsd:simpleType><xsd:restriction base="xsd:string"><xsd:enumeration value="Failed" /><xsd:enumeration value="Running" /></xsd:restriction></xsd:simpleType></xsd:element></Configuration>
<ModuleImplementation Isolation="Any">
<Native>
<ClassID>A580661D-6314-4FB5-AD54-6ECBAFD83230</ClassID>
</Native>
</ModuleImplementation>
<OutputType>System!System.BaseData</OutputType>
<InputType>System!System.BaseData</InputType>
</ProbeActionModuleType>
<ClassID>A580661D-6314-4FB5-AD54-6ECBAFD83230</ClassID> Is it a black box?
Guntars Svilpe

Test Management shows Incorrect status of Defect Incidents in Reports.

Hi Experts,
For Solution Manager Test Management, We have created Defect Correction by Copying it from SMIN Transaction and created user required statuses in it. But when now we are trying to generate report for Test Packages which has Defect Correction raised, We can see that the statuses in the report are not correct, For Example(Instead of Resolved MPT Exceeded, Customer Action MPT Warning it shows MPT Exceeded and MPT Warning respectively.). You can refer to the attached screenshot for more details.
Could you please help me to understand where are this Statuses updated from in the Reports.
Thanks,
Rakesh Bhor.

Rakesh,
First try to match whether the same status also exists in the transaction itself.
In Tcode CRMBS02 double check the status especially the last column with values of INPR/FINI etc which controll whether the ticket is closed or in process .

App Store Update Shows Incorrect Status

App store shows iPhoto 9.3.2 as an available update but I have already downloaded and installed it. Any thoughts on how to correct this?

The Apple Support Communities are an international user to user technical support forum. As a man from Mexico my first language is Spanish. I do not speak English, however I do write in English with the aid of the Mac OS X spelling and grammar checks. I also live in a culture perhaps very very different from your own. When offering advice in the ASC, my comments are not meant to be anything more than helpful and certainly not to be taken as insults.
The Mac App Store can see the apps on attached drives and partitions. Do you have a backup drive connected that has the older version of the app on it?

Bug report: import button shows incorrect state for Photo CDs

When inserting a Kodak Photo CD, a graphic of a CD instead of the array of photos appears (that's fine).
The button in the lower right portion of the window says "Stop Import". When pressed with the mouse, import begins. If pressed during the import, importation stops. While the behavior is correct, the button should say "Begin Import" and then change to "Stop Import".
MikeR

this is user to user forum - if you need to report an issue to Apple use the iPhoto feedback under the iPhoto menu
LN

LastDataRefresh(ROLLUPTIME)-does not show correct date for multiprovider

Hi,
The Last data refresh (Rolluptime) shows incorrect date for multiprovider and we use lot of multiproviders.
Removing the last data refresh from the "Information" button of the Bex Web Analyzer which is using the "Information field web item", shows an empty space and a colon ":" and an empty box.
Please let me know if there is any other way to remove the last data fresh without showing the empty space.
We are on SPS 7 and FEP 7. Is this problem still exist in SPS 8/FEP 8?
Thankyou,
-Sini
Message was edited by: Sini Kumar

Depends on your definition of correct. Your initial question was that this time does not display. This time should display. For a multprovider, it uses this formula
first(last(<All InfoProviders under Multi - ROLLUPTIME>))
It uses the earliest rollup time from the last rolluptime of all the base providers.

Lights-Out Management is not showing full status

Hi,
Since I upgraded my Intel XServe to Leopard, I don't get the full Lights-Out Management (LOM) status any more.
In Server Monitor it is only showing the status for:
- Power
- Temperature
- Blowers
- Security
Not the
- Info
- Memory
- Drives
- Network
Any idea what's wrong?
Thanks,
JO

http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1256863&tstart=0

Logviewer 1.14 showing incorrect times, and other issues.

Couple of issues with running LogViewer, wondering if anyone can help.
First, and seems to be the most frustrating, is that the LogViewer screen is showing incorrect times for the events. I am in Mountain Time zone in the US, which is GMT-7. When looking at the log from a web browser, my router is displaying the correct time. The text file that LogViewer saves on the local computer shows the same correct time. The LogViewer screen, however, shows a time 7 hours into the future. IE, if I type out the log from a DOS window, the last event will say something like "Mar 28 1:15:05 2008", but that same event number will be listed on the logviewer screen as "Mar 28 8:15:05" Any ideas on what may be wrong and how to correct it?
Second, all events seem to be grouped exactly 3 minutes apart. I realize this is probably an effect of the router sending the information every three minutes. Anyone know of a way of changing that period?
Hm, just noticed a third, but very minor issue. The text file written has the wrong day of week on it. It's listing Mar 28 2008 as a Wednesday...
Thanks in advance for any advice.
OK, the tech info. I am running LogViewer 1.14 on a Windows XP machine, contacting an WRT55AG with firmware 1.20. The connection is through a Cat 5 cable, not through the wireless.

Couple of issues with running LogViewer, wondering if anyone can help.
First, and seems to be the most frustrating, is that the LogViewer screen is showing incorrect times for the events. I am in Mountain Time zone in the US, which is GMT-7. When looking at the log from a web browser, my router is displaying the correct time. The text file that LogViewer saves on the local computer shows the same correct time. The LogViewer screen, however, shows a time 7 hours into the future. IE, if I type out the log from a DOS window, the last event will say something like "Mar 28 1:15:05 2008", but that same event number will be listed on the logviewer screen as "Mar 28 8:15:05" Any ideas on what may be wrong and how to correct it?
Second, all events seem to be grouped exactly 3 minutes apart. I realize this is probably an effect of the router sending the information every three minutes. Anyone know of a way of changing that period?
Hm, just noticed a third, but very minor issue. The text file written has the wrong day of week on it. It's listing Mar 28 2008 as a Wednesday...
Thanks in advance for any advice.
OK, the tech info. I am running LogViewer 1.14 on a Windows XP machine, contacting an WRT55AG with firmware 1.20. The connection is through a Cat 5 cable, not through the wireless.

User status for ERP Quotation items in CRM Web UI

Hi,
We have created an assignment block in Opportunity overview screen to show all ERP Quotation created for the opportunity.
This is a tree view and we are displaying Quotation header and its items details.
To achieve this, we used ERPOrder BOL object.
Now, the problem is that we have to show, user status for Quotation header and its items.
I checked the BOL object.
To show user status for Quotation header, I think we have following solution.
ERPAdminH->ERPHeaderUserStSet->ERPUserStatus->field(STATUS_T)
But, I could not find anything to show user status for quotation items.
The following relationship shows only system status.
ERPAdminI->ERPItemStatus->all fields in the underlying structure show the system statuses.
Could anyone help me to find the way to show user status for items?
Thanks & Regards,
Ansal

Hi,
Maybe this description will help you:
[http://weblogs.sdn.sap.com/pub/wlg/23879?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]SAPWeblogsCrm%28SAPWeblogs%3ACRM%29|http://weblogs.sdn.sap.com/pub/wlg/23879?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]SAPWeblogsCrm%28SAPWeblogs%3ACRM%29]
Kind regards
Manfred

Any direct installer for Lightroom? Adobe Application Manager crashes every time (Mac OS 10.9.4)

I'm trying to migrate from Aperture to Lightroom. Needless to say the existing help documentation assumes the installer software doesn't crash!
When using this page:
https://creative.adobe.com/products/download/lightroom
The only download link I can access is:
aam://SAPCode=LTRM?productVersion=5.6?passPhrase=dlC9juiw9Uf9g+Vks1IUflaugqLAqM2EyWucW2/M huZnOYOCur4ZPchERE/PxfIlqFF7/QWRqz+ih8+bvn+J39PlBZwWu33FApnWWqGJO6opmjCzfoFwO73gjpPwAh42tt vFTOwPE+BJB8N6wUFykA/PdAxD9Sn9L2OFSEge5I8=
Which attempts to launch the Adobe Application Manager to perform the installation. However, after displaying the loading screen for approximately one second, it crashes. Is there any way to get a direct download for LightRoom?

Downloads available:
Suites and Programs: CC 2014 | CC | CS6 | CS5.5 | CS5 | CS4 | CS3
Acrobat: XI, X | 9,8 | 9 standard
Premiere Elements: 12 | 11, 10 | 9, 8, 7
Photoshop Elements: 12 | 11, 10 | 9,8,7
Lightroom: 5.6| 5 | 4 | 3
Captivate: 8 | 7 | 6 | 5
Contribute: CS5 | CS4, CS3
Download and installation help for Adobe links
Download and installation help for Prodesigntools links are listed on most linked pages. They are critical; especially steps 1, 2 and 3. If you click a link that does not have those steps listed, open a second window using the Lightroom 3 link to see those 'Important Instructions'.

ISE 1.2 - Posture Detail Assessment - enforcement audit mode report not show status for non-compliant

ISE 1.2 - Posture Detail Assessment - enforcement audit mode report not show status for non-compliant.
- For old version 1.1.4 it can be reported for non-compliant, How can I generate report for this?
Thanks
Kosin Usuwanthim

It used to be in there (id 226635 is the last one with it); should I clean it up a bit and put it back with a bit more of a disclaimer?

Incorrect status in FM report for paid invoices

hello,
I'm working in ECC 6.0 with Former budgeting.
I have several invoices which are created in 2008 but paid in 2009 or in 2010. There are then different fiscal year impacted.
When the invoices are paid, they don't have the value type Payment - Amount type Paid in FM report (FMRP_RFFMEP1AX - All Postings). The invoices still have the status Invoices Original.
As the invoices dont have the status Paid, they are carryforwarded to the next year.
How can I correct that?
When I use the transaction FMF0, the invoices are updated with the current year (2011) in FM report.
And this is not correct.
Is there any customizing to avoid the incorrect status of paid invoices in FM report?
Thank you for your help,
Kind regards,
Chiachen

Hello Chiachen
Please, check your settings in t-code OF29: do you have the flag 'Deactivate check on fiscal year change' On? if you have this flag marked, this could be a reason why you are facing this issue.
You can find good information in the F1 help of such field.
In addition, please review note[400924 Recommendations and rules for the payment transfer in FM|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/400924]
cheers
Mar

AAM showing incorrect status for Lightroom installation.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for