Analysis of multiple orders in KKBC_ORD report

KKBC _ORD report show only one order analysis at a time, but i want to anylysis of multiple orders at a time.
Is there any way to analysis mulple orders in this report?
Regards
Abdul Jabbar

Hello,
We have similar requirement. Did you find any standard solution for this?
Thanks,
V V

Similar Messages

  • Printing a dashboard analysis as multiple separate reports

    Hi,
    I have a report showing data pertaining to various different workers. Is it possibile to setup OBI to print different pdf reports, each for every worker. Or, at least, to set it up to print a single PDF report with different pages for every worker (then I'll split the PDF myself)
    If that is feasible, would it be feasible also on a dashboard scale (i.e., a dashboard with 4 different analyses) ?
    Thanks a lot in advance

    If you are going to keep this in the Presentation Layer, you are not going to avoid creating multiple version of your reports in one form or another. You cannot use dashboard prompts as a column selector without involving the rpd. So you have several options:
    1) Do what I outlined above for your 15 reports.
    2) Create two versions of all of your reports, one for USD and one for EUR. Then create one dashboard and put all your USD reports in them and one dashboard to put all the EUR reports. Create another dashboard with one page which you will expose to the users. This page will have two links, "Reports in USD" and "Reports in EUR" which with Link of Image, will link to the two dashboards you created.
    There are other methods I can think of, and if you insist on using a Dashboard prompt, you can do that too, but not the way outlined in the BiConsulting Group method that involves the rpd. In any case, it will involve making two versions of your reports, too.
    This is your answer, though it may not be favorable to what you want to do.
    Another alternative is this: Why don't you just expose both columns side-by-side so the users can see both? That way they don't even have to choose!

  • How to create itemwise multiple order report Quary?

    Hi,
    create  item A and multiple order 1,2,3  and have different Quantity
    so I want item wise multiple order quantity and BP name it is possible in sap b1
    Item name     BP Name1     Bpname2 Bpname3 
    A                    10                    15          20         

    Hi,
    Yes possible. Please advice in which table you want get quantity.
    Try this for open sales order quantity.
    Select [A] as Itemcode, [D] as Description, [01],[02],[03]
    from(
    SELECT T0.[ItemCode] as A, T0.[Dscription] as D, sum(T0.[Quantity]) as T, T1.[CardCode] as C FROM RDR1 T0  INNER JOIN ORDR T1 ON T0.DocEntry = T1.DocEntry WHERE T0.[LineStatus] = 'o' GROUP BY T0.[ItemCode], T0.[Dscription],T1.[CardCode] )S
    pivot
    (sum(T) FOR C in ([01],[02],[03])) P
    Note: Replace 01,02 and 03 with your customer code.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Nagarajan

  • Dynamic Sorting on Multiple filed in Crystal report 2008

    Hi
      I am using Crystal report 2008 sp3 full build with hotfix 3.3 along with ASP.NET 2.0
      I have implimented the multi filed sorting using the record sort export and setting the sort order in the report designer.
    Now my requirement is such that i would like to have dynamic sorting on multiple fileds while report is displayed in the UI.
    Means suppose i have a report with Customer region,name,city,rating,status etc.
    Now by using the sort control  i would like to have the functionality in such a way that if user
    a)  first sorts on the region then the records should be first sorted by region
    b)  then sorts on the city then the records should be sorted first by region then by city
    c) now sorts on the  rating then the records should be sorted first by region ,second by city and then by rating
    Now other user may do
    a) first sorts on the rating then the records should be first sorted by rating
    b)  then sorts on the status then the records should be sorted first by rating then by status
    c) now user sorts on the  region then the records should be sorted first by rating,second by status and then by region
    and so on the sorting criteria changes from user to user through the UI.
    Is there any way to achieve the dynamic kind of sorting with Crytsal report 2008 where we can set the order of the fileds at sorting in UI dynamically .The sorting order of the fields are not known at the time of design of the report and its completely depends on the user's need.
    Please let me know if you require any information on the same.
    Regards,
    smitha

    Hello,
       Good Day!
       Thanks for your answer.
       Could you please explain me in detail how to achieve this functionality?
       Do i need to create a static parameter?
       I  get my data set through the command option in crystal report.So i think i need to go by formula in the report.
       i am just putting down the steps to follow.Please correct me if i am wrong.
      step1 :Create s static parameter with the name SORT.
    step2: create the formula as you have mentioned like     
        (IF {?Sort}='Vendor Number' THEN {Pr_Voucher_Status;1.Vendor_Key}& " "& {Pr_Voucher_Status;1.ap_remt_key}
        & " " & {@date}
       else
        IF {?Sort}='Invoice Number' THEN {Pr_Voucher_Status;1.ap_vchr_invno}& " " & {Pr_Voucher_Status;1.Vendor_Key}&
        " " &{@date}
       else
       IF {?Sort}='Invoice Amount' THEN {Pr_Voucher_Status;1.ap_vchr_amtc}& " " & {Pr_Voucher_Status;1.Vendor_Key}&
         " " &{@date})
        I could not  understand what this formula is really doing .
        Could you please tell me what the following names indicates? :
                  Pr_Voucher_Status :- Table/Command name ??
                  Vendor Number,Invoice Number etc.. :-  ??
                 Vendor_Key,ap_vchr_invno,ap_vchr_amtc .. :-  Filed names ??
                 use of 1.{} :- ??                              
    step3: place the below formula in the page header  to display the sort order
        (if {?SORT}='Vendor Number' then "Vendor Number, Remit To, Invoice Date"
              else if {?SORT}='Invoice Number' then "Invoice Number, Vendor Number, Invoice Date"
              else if {?SORT}='Invoice Amount' then "Invoice Amount, Vendor Number, Invoice Date") .
    Note:-My report does not have grouping.Do i need to have grouping?
    in this case how the sort control will work  ?
    As i have mentioned in the first post the order of sorting is completely depends on the user's perspective .
    The report is used by the whole organization ..
    i mean the people with different roles like Manger,Team leads,modul leads,developers ,testers etc..
    the usage of report varies according to the roles so the sort order also.
    Regards,
    smitha.
    Edited by: smitha thomas on Mar 16, 2011 5:01 AM

  • Cost Analysis by Sale Order

    Hello,
    I'm seeking to enable in BI a Cost Analysis Scenario with repect to the <b>Sales Orders</b>. That is, something similar to the analysis you can easily perform in the R/3 area <i>Accounting -> Controlling -> Product Cost Controlling -> <b>Product Cost by Sales Order</b></i>.
    For instance in standard report KKBC_KUN, you can choose a sales order number and get all the <b>cost elements</b> related to that sales order, with the corresponding costs.
    I have examined the following objects provided by the BW's Business Content:
    - <u>InfoCube 0PC_C01</u>: it contains only the costs related to <b>production orders</b>, and not the costs associated with sales orders.
    - <u>InfoSource 0CO_OM_CCA_9</u>: it seems interesting, in fact it delivers some header and line item data of the <u>Controlling Object Document</u>. Unfortunately it doesn't deliver the crucial characteristics <i><u>Controlling Object</u></i> and <i><u>Controlling Object Type</u></i>, which I definitly need for enabling my analysis scenario!!
    (By the way, are these 2 characteristics delivered by the BC? There exists a 0COSTOBJ characteristic, but it's not used by any object in the flow afterwards. Moreover, I can't find a standard DataSource in R/3 which I can use to load either its attributes or its texts, and see what data enter it..)
    Business Content for Product Cost by Sales Order), but none could help me.
    It seems really weird that it's not possible to carry out a <b>Cost Analysis by Sales Order</b> in BW, so if anyone has some suggestion it'll be very appreciated indeed.
    Thanks & Regards, Davide

    I eventually found the following SAP Note. No BCT for this analysis scenario....
    <b>Note 584791 - BW-BCT-CO: Costs not extracted on sales orders</b>
    <b>Symptom</b>
    In R/3, costs are posted directly to sales orders. The costs have to be analyzed in the BW system. In the standard system, however, this data is not extracted into the BW system.
    <b>Other terms</b>
    0CO_OM_OPA_1; 0CO_OM_OPA_6
    <b>Solution</b>
    1. There are currently no DataSources for costs on sales orders in the standard BW Business Content. Unfortunately, there are currently no resources scheduled for a new development in this area either.
    2. Therefore, the DataSources and the Business Content must be created in the customer project within the framework of consulting as a customer solution concerning the generic extraction options of the BW Service APIs or function modules you have programmed yourself for extracting data.
    3. Technical background information about costs on sales orders:
    The transaction data is available in the following R/3 tables
    COSS and COSP - Totals records or COEP - Line items.
    This concerns records for the VB* object numbers.
    The master data of the sales orders is contained in the VBAK and VBAP tables.
    The 0CO_OM_OPA_1 and 0CO_OM_OPA_6 DataSources only extract costs for orders with master data in the AUFK table. These types of requests always have OR* object numbers. Therefore, these DataSources cannot be used for sales orders.
    However, you may be able to assign requests from the AUFK table (for example, maintenance orders or production orders) to a sales order through the AUFK-KDAUF table field.

  • Results Analysis on Sales Orders

    Hi Fellows,
    When i am running the results analysis for Sales orders using KKAK transaction , I do not wish to see the WIP items with 0 Values.So i selected the option " Hide Orders with 0 values in Results List ".
    However I am still getting the WIP items with 0 Value.
    I saw the help for this and it says
    " Note: In some cases individual objects may still appear in the list when both the column "Reserves for unrealized costs" (reserve for unrealized costs + reserve for complaints/commissions) and the column "Reserves for imminent loss" are a sum of multiple value fields and these value fields are checked individually for zero value ".
    From the above, I came to the conclusion that the 0 value items may still come even if we check the box.
    However from the above note, can anyone tell me where i can check the " Reserves for Unrealized Costs " and " Reserves for Imminent Loss " and also how can i know what are the value fields which are adding up to these columns.
    Also it says the Value fields are individually checked for zero value.
    Where can i see the Value fields associated with this Results Analysis and where can i see if the Value fields are assigned a value of zero.
    Please let me know if you have any thoughts on this..
    Thanks in advance..
    Srik

    Hi,
    Check whether Note 501915 - Creation, cancellation, and usage of reserves would help.
    Regards,
    P.S: Please post this question in FI/CO forum so that you can get answers quickly.

  • Change of partner analyse in sales orders

    Hello,
    I changed the partner analyse for sales orders and added a new mandatory partnerrole.
    In new documents the partner analyse works fine, but in the existed sales documents I cant´t see, that a mandotory role is missing.
    How can I see that this role is missing in the exsting documents???
    Thanks for info
    Nicole

    You can create a custom report but there is no standard way to do this.
    When a document is created in SAP, it is a "snapshot" of that configuration, master data, and information as it exists when the document is created.  On the SD side there are a few things you can influence, for example, SAP contains some standard tools for mass updating of pricing information.  Most of the document exists in its unchanged state though. 
    You *may* be able to use VA05 and do this (although I doubt it, no system in front of me right now).  Other than that transaction or a custom report there really aren't a lot of options.
    If you are familiar enough with the tables, you can do a "quick view" or an ABAP Query to get the info.  However the SAP partner table is recursive so to avoid getting lots and lots of duplicates you will either have to add some code to a full query, or do offline manipulation of the data.
    If you're looking for soild SAP experience to help through some of these hurdles, please contact me.
    Bill Wood - President
    R3Now Consulting
    http://www.r3now.com SAP thought leadership!
    Platinum SAP Solutions
    (704) 905 - 5175
    http://www.linkedin.com/in/billwood

  • Multiple orders scheduling in one screen - Revisions.

    Hi,
    Is it possible to schedule multiple orders in one screen using network graphics?
    Scenario is: in day to day operations we create maintenance orders and plan operations with its duration.
    after planning, if it requires more down time than permitted, we keep it for quarterly shutdown. For same we assign maintenance revision to each order. Now SAP provides report of all shutdown jobs based on revisions but we can not schedule multiple orders at a time using network graphic. eg. order 01 will start first, after this 02, 03 will start as parallel activity after that 04 will start.
    Please advise.
    Thanks,
    Nilesh.

    Using Maintenance Event Builder, you can use that functionality. Check this link.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_di471/helpdata/en/d7/d0b83a47d0c649e10000000a114084/content.htm

  • KKBC_ORD report - filtering by Cost Centre

    Hi,
    I was trying to filter KKBC_ORD report for Confirmation Transactions to show only a specified cost centre.
    I set up a filter on cost centre column, but when I specify cost centre and confirm this filtering, it shows no data even though this cost centre is used and can be found in KKBC_ORD report when filter is not set.
    Have you had a similar issue? Is it some kind of program bug? Maybe there is an SAP note to fix that?
    Thank you,
    Karol

    Thank you Ajay,
    Unfortunately KKBC_ORD is being used by our Production Line Coordinators to verify data order by order and they are only interested in confirmations executed on specific cost centres. This is why we need to focus on KKBC_ORD.
    Do you know whether this filtering problem is a program error or is it done on a purpose and has some good explanation?
    For me it seems an error and I thought there would be a fix for it as filtering is a standard functionality.
    Thanks,
    Karol

  • Analysis across multiple cubes - OBIEE 10g/11g

    Hi,
    Does OBIEE supports analysis across multiple cubes ? or it is inherent to OBIEE ?
    Regards,
    Junaid

    You can use union reports
    For example
    req 2) Product_Group column formula fx "Budgeted'
             Budget column formula fx Filter (budget using product_group in ('alpha','beta')
    req 3) Product_Group column formula fx "Not Budgeted'
             Budget column formula fx Filter (budget using product_group not in ('alpha','beta')
    mark correct/helpful if its correct/helpful

  • Multiple breaks in a report

    I am producing a report which has distinct values for all columns except one, for which there are multiple values.
    The problem is that all the distinct value columns are displayed multiple times in the report.
    I want them only displayed once. I can use "BREAK ON" to make sure the first of these columns only has its value displayed once, but how do I do this to the other columns? Multiple "BREAK ON" statements don't do it.

    > Hi, but what if there is another field - e.g.
    deptname - and I only want this field to display a
    value once in the same name as deptno?
    Sorry, I don't understand this. Could you explain some more?
    Message was edited by:
    Rob van Wijk
    or maybe I do understand, but I don't see the problem:
    SQL> break on deptno on dname on job skip 1
    SQL> select e.deptno, d.dname, e.job, e.ename from dept d, emp e where e.deptno = d.deptno order by 1,2,3
      2  /
                                    DEPTNO DNAME          JOB       ENAME
                                        10 ACCOUNTING     CLERK     MILLER
                                                          MANAGER   CLARK
                                                          PRESIDENT KING
                                        20 RESEARCH       ANALYST   SCOTT
                                                                    FORD
                                                          CLERK     ADAMS
                                                                    SMITH
                                                          MANAGER   JONES
                                        30 SALES          CLERK     JAMES
                                                          MANAGER   BLAKE
                                                          SALESMAN  MARTIN
                                                                    WARD
                                                                    ALLEN
                                                                    TURNER
    14 rijen zijn geselecteerd.

  • Deleting multiple rows in a report ?

    db11gxe  , apex 4.0 , firefox 24 ,
    how to delete multiple rows in a report at one time ?
    thanks

    Hi newbi_egy,
    Here is a small demo with few steps that can be used in your scenario-
    1) Below is the query of a report on emp table which has empno column with unique values-
    SELECT APEX_ITEM.CHECKBOX(1,empno) " ", ename, job FROM   emp ORDER  by 1
    2) A Delete button is created that submits the page.
    3) An on-submit process is created with Process point On Submit - After Computation and Validations with condition that the below process runs when Delete button clicked.
    BEGIN
    FOR i in 1..APEX_APPLICATION.G_F01.count
    LOOP
    delete from emp where empno=APEX_APPLICATION.G_F01(i);
    END LOOP;
    END;
    I hope this might help you.
    Regards,
    Das123

  • Analysis of Sales order

    To analyse the sale order we are using the TCode  KKBC_KUN.  I observed there are three columns in that report plan costs, actual costs and variance.  
    From where thse plan costs are picking by the system in this report. Actually my problem is there is commission on sales.. it is only visible in the actual costs column only... it is not visible in plan column costs. ...
    Can any one help me in this issue... where i can check plan costs???
    Thanks
    Radha

    Hiya,
    If you are looking for tables, I believe the cost is picked up from table COSP.
    However, you can perform a Sales Order Costing by going into the Sales Order and then Extras --> Costing. You need to setup the appropriate Costing Variants for this.
    Not sure if this helps, so write back if you need more info.
    Cheers.

  • Plan costs calculation during results analysis of sales order

    Hi Experts,
    I am in process of implementing sales order costing. I am facing a problem during result analysis with plan costs data.
    We have a sales order for which production order is generated. Cost object is sales order.
    Say, sales order cost estimate which is the plan costs --> is $ 1000 (which includes prod order COGM of $ 600) (So remaining sales and admin costs are $ 400)
    Plan cost of production order is $ 550 (as per production order cost analysis report)
    While calculating the result analysis for sales order, system is calculating the plan costs data as $ 1000 + $ 550 = $ 1550
    As a result, I feel plan costs data during result analysis is over calculated.
    I feel either plan costs should be $ 1000 (as it already includes COGM part)
    or
    $ 950 which is (plan cost of production order $ 550 + sales and admin costs of $ 400)
    Could some one explain me why result analysis shows plan costs data as $ 1500 and if I need to rectify how can I do so.
    Thanks,
    GAN

    Any suggestions please.
    Edited by: DSK on Feb 9, 2012 6:16 AM
    Edited by: DSK on Feb 13, 2012 4:39 AM

  • Multiple order sort in xsl

    Hi all,
    Does anyone know how I would go about doing a multiple order sort through my xsl? For example, sort by name first, then sort those results by date, thanks in advance.

    okay, that would work, but i think i have a problem, i have an xml that looks like this:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
    <report>
    - <column_headers>
    <heading>Heading1</heading>
    <heading >Heading2</heading>
    </column_headers>
    - <results>
    - <row>
    <attr1>value1</attr1>
    <attr2>value2</attr2>
    </row>
    - <row>
    <attr1>value3</attr1>
    <attr2>value4</attr2>
    </row>
    - <row>
    <attr1>consulting agreement</attr1>
    <attr2>yesterday</attr2>
    </row>
    </results>
    - <sort default="attr1">
    - <order-by id="attr2">
    <clause>attr2</clause>
    <clause>attr1</clause>
    </order-by>
    </sort>
    </report>
    I need to sort the row nodes by attr2 first, then attr1, and i have something like this in my xsl:
    <xsl:if test="$sortField != 'default'">
    <xsl:for-each select="/report/sort/order-by">
    <xsl:variable name="idField" select="@id"/>
    <xsl:if test="$idField=$sortField">
    <xsl:for-each select="/report/results/row">
    <xsl:sort select="*[name()=$newSort]"/> --> i need the sort statements here for both attr2 and attr1, but how do i get them out of the xml whenI don't know beforehand how many clause nodes there will be, or what they will contain
    <tr>
    <xsl:for-each select="*">
    <td class="report">
    <xsl:value-of select="."/>
    </td>
    </xsl:for-each>
    </tr>
    </xsl:for-each>

Maybe you are looking for