Authorization issue in Maintenance Planner groups

Hi Gurus,
I have created 5 Planner groups to a plant in SPRO -> Plant maintenance and Customer Service -> Master Data in Plant maintenance and Customer Service -> Technical Objects -> General data -> Define Planner groups.
When one of the planner group tried to open IL03 , to display a functional location. it is giving me an error quoting " No Authirization for Maintenance planner group XXX" . But the same planner group has got the authorisation for other plants for which it was created before.
Do i need to make any authorization settings for the newly created planner group for this plant?
Please advice and Thanks for your help in Advance.
regards,
Saakithyan.

Check [sample|http://www.scribd.com/doc/24860482/SAP-Role-profile-create?secret_password=1sdozshvwsga6l0oygtv#fullscreen:off] role creation. similiar you need to add planner group restriction using the Object: I_INGRP with field INGRP and IWERK
Thanks
-S.N

Similar Messages

  • Defining Mainteanance planner groups

    Dear EAM Experts,
    We have maintained the maintenance planner group for the general maintenance task list in the following
    Maintenance Plans, Work Centers, Task Lists and PRTs - > Basic Settings - > Define Maintenance Planner Groups.
    But when creating the general maintenance task list when I entered the maintenance planner defined earlier system is throwing the following error
    Entry 1000 PL1 does not exist in T024A - check your entry
    Please help.
    Thanks,
    DSL

    Dear DSL,
    Please follow the link and configure your planner group.
    Maintenance Plans, Work Centers, Task Lists and PRTs--->Task lists>General data-->Configure planner group.
    This will solve your problem i guess.
    Regards
    Vivek

  • Planner group authorization in order

    Hi,
    i am planning to give the chnage authorization of maintenance orders and notifications on the basis of planner group. The planner group is maintained in equipment master data and copied to order and notification upon creation. Now the problem i am facing is that i created one role for change order and in that i used the authorization object I_INGRP and maintain planner group values and t code: IW32. now when user is changing the order the authorization is coming in to picture but during order creation also the authorization check is there. I dont want the authorization check at order creation level but only at order change level. That why i only put t code IW32 in role. Can anyone tell me why the system is checking authorization at creation level and how to avoid this.

    System will check Planner group authorisation during work order creation, See [simulation|http://www.scribd.com/doc/24194024/authorisation-issue-check].
    As i understood, the planner group XXX need to change the workorder created by YYY for the equipment planner group XXX.
    or Create custom auth object and enhance the code to check the restriction
    -S.N

  • Planner group field in Maintenance order

    Hi,
    When we create a General Maintenance Order, the planner group from Equipment/Functional Location, value, will automatically appear in the Order.
    But in Refurbishment Order, which is for material, the planner group field do not come automatically.
    Is there any option to maintain the planner group field in the Material master, so that, this can appear automatically in the Refurbishment order.
    Kindly suggest.
    Raja.

    Hi Kutti Raja,
    The Material Master route you are looking for does not look feasible,as there is no relation between Planner Group and Material .
    If your Refurbishment Order is triggered through a Notification (M4), then Planner Group automatically flows to Order.
    The other alternative can be
    1. Create a Z-Table having Material vs Planner Group.
    2, Use the User-Exit  IWO10018  to have default planner group INGPR value.
    This works as I have already tested while replying to a discussion. Please go through this.work order completed by
    and go through my reply having 6 steps. You need to work in the similar lines.
    Take help of an ABAPer.
    Jogeswara Rao K

  • Authorization as per planner group

    Dear experts,
                    i want to give authorization to change F loc and equipment as per planner groups.....
    What till now i have done I had assigned planner groups (Departments) to equipments and f.locs.....now my requirement is that only persons who belong to that planner group should be able to create or change the master data....
    Plz tell me the rpocedure to that.....
    Thnks in advance
    Regards
    Rahul

    Hi,
    For this you have to create the diffrent roles for the equipment and function location.
    Use the authorization object I_INGRP for controling based on Planner Group.
    In the role give the Planeer Group,Planning Plant and Tcode(IE02 & IL02).
    Regards,
    Sunil

  • Segregating maintenance plan with reference to planner group & cycle.

    Hi,experts,
    Is there any t-code to search maintenance plan as per planner group as well as cycle length?I tried with t-code IP15, but there is neither planner group or maintenance item field?please,suggest .thanks in advance.
    rgds
    rajib

    Hi,
    There is no relationship or filed which directly u can get like planner gr,section etc. One way  can use is use filed named as Maint Plan Sort Field. Provide here some details after making proper codification through Customeriastion.
    One way Like Maint plant + Planner Gr = Maint Plan Sort.
    Attach appropriate sort filed in each plan then with ip10,1p30,1p19,ip24 u can retrive the information.
    Ramesh

  • Planner group vs maintenance work centre?

    hi
    in IDES server generally planner group and maintenance work centre are same.can they be different if so then please
    explain with example.
    regards
    sanjay

    Hi,
    Work Center - represents a unit that is capable of performing work. It can be a group of person, equipment and special resources used to MANAGE the work order and/or PERFORM work order operations during maintenance execution. It can be used to model a resource availability within the organisation. There are 2 types, Main Work Center (responsible for overall managemetn of the work) and Operational Work Center (executes the operation activities).
    Planner Group - represents a person or group of persons responsible for the PLANNING and PROCESSING of several maintenance Work Orders.
    Cheers,
    Joey

  • Controlling same Notification Types against few Planner groups

    Dear Experts,
    We have four groups of Maintenance Team (Mec, Ele, Inst & Civ)  which are controlled against four roles to create same Notification types. The control factor is planner group which are linked against their required role and it is working fine to create notification (IW21) for their specific group.
    The problem which we are facing is, change mode of Notification,  Mech planner group team can change the details of Notification in Elec group as
    same Notification types are used by 4 groups. Is there any way to restrict for the change authorization (IW22) in Notification as four teams are following four differernt roles.
    Regards,
    Sahu

    Ajaya,
    Check the values in Authorization Object I_QMEL. (PFCG tcode of the respective Role) See the picture below. Assume this is your role for Civil Notification type (CE). It should look like this.
    Also, try by removing the values in TCD field in other authObjects of this Role.
    One more possibility is
    Some Role other than this specific Role is enabling the user for IW22. This role might have been assigned to all these 3 users. You need to trace this and remove or modify the role.
    This problem is a typical one often seen to be associated with AuthObjects, This can be managed by investigation.
    A last resort method can be to manage this through user-exit QQMA0014. This is possible.
    KJogeswaraRao

  • Authorization issue - help request

    Hi guys,
    One of the consultants is having an authorization issue ( He is not abele to run a t-code)
    I ask him to run a su53 report and i am not sure how to proceed with this.
    Please help.
    Here are the details from the SU53 report.
    DISPLAY AUTHORIZATION DATA FOR USER VYXXXX
    User : VYXXX                       profile parameter authorization buffering    4
    Authorization Object: F_KNA1_GRP
    Description
    Authorization check failed:
          + Authorization object F_KNA1_GRP Customer Account Group Authorization
                Activity                                08
                Customer Account Group     ZM01
    Users Authorization Data :
          +  Authorization object F_KNA1_GRP Customer Account Group Authorization
                   Authorization  T-PD19002300
                  Authorization  T-UG39000900
                  Authorization  T-UG39001000
    Please help me guys what need to  be performed.
    Regards,
    Vamsi.

    Hi Vamsi,
    SU53 shows us the last failed authorization for a user. However, it might not only be the failed authorization object failed.
    Hence, "just to learn" , you can use transaction ST01 to enable and run a trace for particular users. Be sure to use in a test environment first, and with proper filters. (for a particular user only).
    Then check-> which auth object is failing.
    RC=4 means a object value is failing.
    RC=12 means an object is missing!
    Check, which tcode is calling that object and this tcode is present in which role. Then.........proceed.
    You can check the SAP documentation on running traces on the help portal of SAP.  I think you will find the answer yourself by troubleshooting more and may be massaging some test roles here and there!
    Likewise, if you are new to security, I would encourage you to start by reading some books on SAP security. Authorizations made easy is a good book to start with.
    Let me know if you have any questions
    EOD for me :P . take care
    Abhishek

  • Authorization issue within a table in BI

    Hello All,
    Here is my authorization issue :
    We have set up an authorization on infoobject Zapplication. End user is allowed to choose "HR" only.
    In Rsecadmin, infoObject Zapplication is restricted to "HR"
    Then, this authorization object has been assigned to end user.
    This user go to a specific table to select an application and a date.
    When user display the possible value he only see "HR". Which means our authorization is correct.
    However, this user can enter another value such as "SD". This value does exist in infoObject Zapplication. So, it means that there is an issue with our authorizations settings.
    We have added a control table, it's even worse in this case, authorization are not checked at all and all available values are displayed.
    Any idea to prevent the user to entered a value within this table ?
    Why our authorization does not check the value entered directly in the table ?
    Thanks &
    Regards
    Cath

    Hello
    For info we manged to restrict acces on this table by using event table from table maintenance and we have combined it with a specific authorisation object.
    Regs
    C.

  • S_CTS_ADMI Authorization issue

    Hi Experts,
    Every now and again a user sends me a SU53 with the error requesting access to S_CTS_ADMI field TABL. The user of this morning is trying to release a purchase order using transaction ME29N. Why would the SU53 indicate that the user want to maintain the control tables of the Change and Transport System in Production when they are trying to release a purchase order? I am running a trace ST01 but it's not helping.
    Could you please help me to resolve issue.
    Thanks
    Pavel

    Hi
    Gowri is perfectly ok. Below Objects checked.
    M_BEST_BSA
    M_BEST_EKG
    M_BEST_EKO
    M_BEST_WRK
    Along with that M_EINK_FRG also get checked.
    Check for access to all of the above Objects in user master records. Before that check with MM team to get these values of the PO that the approver is trying to release.
    1) Document Type : Relate with M_BEST_BSA
    2) Purchasing Group : Relate to M_BEST_EKG
    3) Purchasing Organization : Relate to M_BEST_EKO
    4) Plant : Relate to M_BEST_WRK
    5) Release code & release Group : Relate to Object M_EINK_FRG
    You also can get these information through ME23N
    If all of the above matches with user master record and PO then there is no further authorization issue. Rest on MM team !!!!!
    Best of luck...
    Arpan

  • Planner Group field in equipment master data

    Dear All,
    My client is having Maintenance dept. which is divided in to 3 sub departments like Mechanical, Electrical & Civil. By referring this I am going to create following Planner Groups.
    I have decided to maintain following planner groupu2019s for planning & preparing maintenance tasks.
    1) Head Mechanical
    2) Head Electrical
    3) Head Civil
    In my case I am planning to maintain Planner Group at Equipment level. I am not going to maintain at Functional Location level.
    My client is saying that they have many Equipmentu2019s for which Planner Group must be above 3 & few Equipments having Mechanical & Electrical Planner Group.
    For example, Compressor is Equipment for that Mechanical & Electrical both is responsible for planning & preparing maintenance tasks. *So they wanted both Planner Groups to be maintained at Equipment level. But as per SAP standard you can maintain only one Planner Group at Equipment or Functional Location level.*
    I have few questions in my mind related to Planner Group.
    1) What is the importance of Planner Group?
    2) If I have not maintained Planner Group at Functional Location & Equipment Level then what will happen?
    3) Can I maintain Planner Group at PM Order level?
    4) Suppose I have maintained Planner Group u201CHead Mechanicalu201D in Equipment but after some days there is some electrical maintenance is come up. Then I will create PM order for carrying out Electrical maintenance, in this can I able to change Planner Group from Mechanical to Electrical. But is this a correct way to change Planner Group in PM Order.
    Regarding this query how I can convince to my client.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Sandeep

    Sandeep,
    I would suggest the structuring the system as follows.
              Mechanical (Work center)
                        MEng1 (Activity = Engineer name or Employee code)
                        MEng2 (Activity)
                        MEng3 (Activity)
                        MEng4 (Activity)
              Mechanical (Work center)
                        EEng1 (Activity = Engineer name or Employee code)
                        EEng2 (Activity)
                        EEng3 (Activity)
                        EEng4 (Activity)
              Civli (Work center)
                        CEng1 (Activity = Engineer name or Employee code)
                        CEng2 (Activity)
                        CEng3 (Activity)
                        CEng4 (Activity)
    In a single order you can use different work center activities... ie. in a single order, you can use Elect Eng for some operations + Mech eng for some operations
    Capture and seggregate  the cost of each dept in the same order ie. Elect Labor cost, Mech labor cost in Cost tab
    You can get the report work center wise and Activity type wise
    Babu

  • User addition in planner group

    Hello gurus,
    I need add a person to a Planner group in plant maintenance how do i do that?? is that done by HR??
    Thank you in advance

    Hi,
    Personnel are setup on the work center / Plant.  You can check and create assignments from transaction CR02. In the capacity tab, double click on the capacity category and then click the 'HR Assignment' button.
    -Paul

  • Planner Group Report

    Hi
    Is there any standard transaction by which i can get the list of all the planner groups I am having in the system or in the Maintenance Plant.
    Regards
    Iftikhar

    Hi
    The planner groups are defined through IMG(SPRO). so thereis no any standard report fot thie,
    you get from t-code OIAI, or from table V_T024I.
    -ashok

  • Planner Group

    Hi,
    I have defined planner groups for the maintenance orders. I was able to see the planner groups while creating PM orders at header data.
    The question is that while I am creating general maintenance task list I was unable to see the same planner groups in task list header data at assignements to header.
    What could be the reason and is there any difference b/w orders planner group and task list planner group.
    Regards
    Srinivas

    Hi Srini
    Planner group for task list u have to define in SPRO
    Plant Maintenance and Customer Service - Maintenance Plans, Work Centers, Task Lists and PRTs - Task Lists - General Data - Configure Planner Group
    Since the planner group for order is configured in Technical Objects
    Points (If its useful)
    - Pithan
    Edited by: Pithan Pithan on Sep 22, 2008 4:34 PM

Maybe you are looking for