Authorization issues MM/PP STATUS   Changes

Hello,
I'm getting the following error  even with SAP_ALL SAP_NEW
BDC Transaction Report for ZM02. Report: ZUCC0026
Run by:      KHALIFAO                            page:     1
On:          11/11/2009                          at : 09:06:12
In System:   Q47
Authorization issues  MM/PP STATUS               Changes
M365SC1110020      ZFIN M680 MM/PP STATUS 00 Not authorized to change MM/PP status
One of my user is having the following error when she excuted the following steps :
Steps:
  SE38/ ZUCC0026   - Material Mass update program for Costing View
Enter the following fields before executions
Material : M365SC1110020
Plant: M680
Check off  update material
Field to update: select MM/PP status
New Value: 00
Execute transaction 
Thanks
Osama
Expected results: output document should states that update of MM/PP status was changed from XX to 00. 
This message

Hello Julius,
SY-UNAME
ZUCC0026                           550   WRITE: / 'BDC Transaction Report for ZM02. Report:'(b01),
                                                 / 'Run by:     '(b02) ,sy-uname COLOR 5,
                                  1167 *  IF sy-uname <> 'BATCH'.
                                  1183   READ TABLE itab_zusrgroup WITH KEY group_id = group_id
                                                                            user_name = sy-uname.
                                  1212     SELECT SINGLE update_ind scop_ind
                                               FROM zusrgroup INTO (itab-update_field,l_scop_ind)
                                                      WHERE user_name = sy-uname
                                                      AND   group_id  = itab_fields-group_id.
                                  1219 *               WHERE user_name = sy-uname
                                  1223     READ TABLE i_zplant WITH KEY
                                                                  user_name = sy-uname
                                                                  werks = itab-werks.
                                  1422   SELECT werks FROM zusrplant
                                                      INTO zusrplant-werks
                                                      WHERE user_name = sy-uname.
                                  1453     MOVE: sy-uname TO i_zplant-user_name,
Parameter  :
188 *PARAMETERS: p_mode TYPE c DEFAULT 'N' NO-DISPLAY.    JHSIR35508-
189 PARAMETERS:      p_field LIKE itab_fields-descriptio.
190 PARAMETERS:      p_name  LIKE itab_fields NO-DISPLAY.
191 PARAMETERS:      p_newval(14) TYPE c.
193 PARAMETERS:      p_file(100) TYPE c LOWER CASE.
194 PARAMETERS:      p_filval AS CHECKBOX.                      "0001+
195 PARAMETERS:      p_unix   AS CHECKBOX.                      "0004+
  33 PARAMETERS:          P_UPD AS CHECKBOX.
Thanks
Osama

Similar Messages

  • CJ20N Authorization Object for Project Status Changes

    Hi Gurus,
      Can any one knows the Authorization Object responsible to control the change of status for a project in the CJ20N?
      We want to control who can and who can't change the STATUS of a project independent from other changes.
    Regards
    Gustavo Balboa

    User authorization object B_USERSTAT. Before that u should define authorization key in Tcode:BS52 and assign it to User status in Tcode:OK02.
    In authorization object B_USERSTAT set ERSL=Authorization Key, so that the user can change the status of that perticular status only.
    Venkat

  • Authorization issue on Inventory Status Report!

    Dear All,
    One particular user is already authorized to access "inventory Status Report" .Moreover, Inventory Status Report's window is opened when he clicks but after pressing OK button the following messages comes [You are not permitted to perform this action  [Message 200-30]].
    Please advise me....

    Hi,
    As suggested above, re-post it as a question thread. You need to close your old open thread too.
    Thanks,
    Gordon

  • ERecruitment (EHP4) distributed scenario  - Questions status changes

    I am creating questions in draft mode and then changing back the status to released after it is complete.
    I then want to create the questionnaires and use them in the process template.
    Issue:
    Even though I can change the status of the questions from "Draft" to "Released", when I close the "Create Questions screen and come back, the status automatically reverts back to "Draft".
    Periodic Services are running every 5 minutes.
    Due to the issue with the status change, I cannot create a questionnaire and release them to be used elsewhere.
    Any thoughts on where else to look?
    Thanks, Sunil

    Hello sunil,
    I could reproduce this error in one of the sandboxes I can access.
    The reason for this system behavouir seems to be an inconsistency in configuration of SES search. When you save the questionaire in status released the UI shows a success message but you should find an error message in TCode SLG1 like:
    - Exit WRITE_CPOINTER_SES of exit area AT does not exist or
    - Enhancement'Write Change Pointer for SES Search (in COM_SE_CPO' (area 'Follow-Up Processing (Background)') is not assigned to category 'Evaluable Information'
    The error is not shown in the UI as someone put the following code in there:
    METHOD save_quesnr_status.
      TRY.
          CALL METHOD cl_hrrcf_qa_bl=>change_template_status
            EXPORTING
              p_template_id = is_quesnr_object-objid
              p_new_status  = iv_status_new.
        CATCH cx_root.
      ENDTRY.
    ENDMETHOD.
    On a system wehre I did the SES config myself questionaires can be released correctly. Please apply the sap note 1098046 step by step (esp. number 2 and 3 are important for this special issue, including the note mentioned there). After doing this on the sandbox releasing questionaires works fine.
    Best regards
    Roman

  • Authorization issue with VA02 radio buttons

    Hello All,
    We are stuck at one authorization issue. The user navigates using tcode VA02.
    1)     Execute Tcode -VA02=>
    2)     2) puts order number # 100001 =>
    3)     press enter =>
    4)     press enter =>
    5)     Screen: Change (Company Name) Return 100001: Overview =>
    6)     Option: Display doc. Header details (looks like a magnifying glass beside PO_date) =>
    7)     This bring us to Change (Company Name) Return 100001: header Data =>
    8)     select status tab =>
    9)     on Status tab lower end there is a button u201CObject Statusu201D =>
    10)     Press it => 
    11)     Come to Change Status :
    12)     On this screen There is Status with status no. on the right side with 7 options
    e.g:
    u2022     1 BLK Approval Required for,
    u2022     2 BL1 Approval for Credit,
    u2022     3 BL2 Approval for material Replacer
    We need to restrict the radio button access for user for which we are unable to find the authorization object.
    Could any one help.
    Thanks & Regards
    gab

    Hi,
    Use ST01 to trace the user activities and check which objects its hitting when you click on those buttons, then you can restrict radio buttons using those objects.
    I have'nt run the tcode myself and performed the steps you mentioned, but if you think its calling other transaction from those buttons you can manage tht in SE97, or add the t-code VA02 in the S_tcode auth object in PFCG.
    Hope this should get you going
    Thanks,
    Vijay

  • Update overview log on status change in SM 4.0

    When processing support desk messages in CRM_DNO_MONITOR, we change the status to 'In process' and other values.  While these actions are recorded in the change documents, we are looking for a method of recording selected status changes with the date and user in the Overview log on the Transaction Data tab.  It would seem that this would be defined in SPPFCADM but none of the action definitions seem to match what we are trying to accomplish.  Any help provided will be appreciated, thanks in advance.

    I essentially need to figure out how to solve the following issue:
    Change requests cannot be displayed or created, because the RFC connection has errors, or is not maintained.
    Check whether the RFC connection to the Change Man agement system is under the key CHARM_DEST (APPLI field in the DESTINAT field), in the view BCOS_CUST. You need authorization for the cross-client view/table maintenance (S_TABU_DIS and S_TABU_CLI).
    Not sure how to check this!
    Check the RFC connection in the transaction SM59. If your SAP Solution Manager system is also your Change Manager system, the internal connection must be 'NONE'. You need authorization for the administration of RFC connections (S_RFC_ADM).
    My Solution Manager is my Change Manager system.
    You may have to dumb it down for me. 
    Thanks

  • Sale Order Status Change after delivery of materials from projects

    have ETO sccenario which consists of all modules such as SD,PS.PP etc. Materials will be procured from external vendors & manufactured inhouse through project systems. After delivery of materials from project systems, billing & invoicing will be done at sales level.
    On delivery of materials from projects, sale order status remain open. Request you to look into the matter & suggest about status change of sale order after delivery / billing.
    Regards,
    Ranjan

    Hi,
    In sale order, WBSE is assigned. Delivery of materials are through cns0. then subsequently picking / packing / billing will happen at sales level. Billing is of delivery related. Please suggest to fix the issue.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Biplab Ranjan

  • Question over the appraisal status change

    Dear All,
    Our appraisal has ( following the flexible template ) has planning, mid year review and final phases. With in each main status we have sub status configured. Example - In the planning stage ( say in the month of February ) , employee add objectives, change weights etc and send to manager for approval. If manager approves, the document status will be changed from planning  to mid year status and employee's form is changed to the display mode ( so he cannot update objectives / weight etc)
    Then again in the mid year  status ( say a few months later - June ist ), the employee needs to review the appraisal, add or update the objectives etc and submit for manager approval.
    My issue is -  After the employee's appraisal form is changed to display only from planning to review status - How the employee's appraisal  form can be changed from a read only to change mode in the same status ? As it is necessary for employee to add/ update in the form.
    I am seeking the best approaches for the below as I am considering two options ( as mentioned below )
    1)   For the  mid year status  , I will configure a sub status ( called start mid year ) and attach a push button. The employee select the push button during the mid year  period ( say June 1st ) and this push button triggers the status change from Mid year to Mid Year / Start Mid year. We also plan to apply a custom implementation for  BADI for column access and badi  (HRHAP00_COL_ACCESS) will decide the access control for columns etc.
    2) The other approach I am considering is we are considering a workflow (INFO_APPRAISEE_CHANGE_REVIEW ) to notify th employee 7 days before the mid year review starts. Can this workflow trigger the status change or read the column access from the BADI (HRHAP00_COL_ACCESS) ?
    Any other simpler approaches ?
    I saw in the Process config ( tabs and process ) that we can define the phase with dates and status / substatus etc. Can this be useful for the above scenario. For eg. On June 1st when the mid year review start, can the status be changed  like from Mid year  to Mid Year / Start Mid year ?
    Please let me know . Greatly Appreciated!
    Aneez Hameed

    Hi Aneez, both options are great,   HRHAP00_COL_ACCESS is configurable at each sub-status, so you have many options.  You can have the manager "approve" at beginning of year, but keep it in "in planning" by having a 3rd sub-status.
    You can have the employee or manager have access to the pushbutton so that mid-term can start. 
    you can also do a workflow option where it is changed automatically, your option 2.
    the final option is the HR adminstrator can change the status, by doing a mass select in phap_admin and then they change to the status to move it to "in review" with all of your mid-term substatuses. 
    they key to making this work is the additional config that goes along with HRHAP00_COL_ACCESS.  here you will want to do define a Z table with the following columns:
    object id - your template ID
    role - which are the same roles values defined at your template - apee for apraisee
    template status - integer - represents status ID
    template sub-status - ID
    column id - FAPP, OBJO, etc..
    availability indicator (char) - here you will configure H, X etc... which the badi uses to know how to handle it. 
    best regards - michael

  • Secured WebDAV Mounted Volume Authorization Issues

    I use a secure WebDAV mounted volume from myDisk.se and up until the latest Security Update have had zero issues being able to manipulate files and folders as I would on a normal volume. However, since the installation of the Security Update (2009-004 (PowerPC) 1.0) I find weird things happening with this mounted volume:
    1) I am able to mount the secured WebDAV share using my security credentials.
    2) I can create a default "untitled" folder but when I try to change its name, the WebDAV authorization dialog pops up and despite entering the same credentials (why, I am not sure as the volume has already been properly credentialed in order to be mounted), access is denied.
    3) Trying to create a file within a folder on the mounted WebDAV volume I previously created pre-update causes the same authorization issue.
    I have no other WebDAV shares I can try to mount from any other companies so I am not sure if this is a myDisk issue or one borne from the Security Update. I am not a .Mac/MobileMe user and that info is not filled out in System Preferences. The internal hard drive has been meticulously maintained with Disk and Permissions repair being run both before and after each and every software update installed. Likewise, the volume's structure is also checked both before and after and shows no need for repairs.
    Any ideas? Perhaps there is a corrupted file somewhere that's affecting the authorizations needed by this third-party WebDAV volume?
    The machine that has this problem is the last model iBook G4/1.33GHz 12" display, 1.5GB RAM, and a 100GB 5400rpm HD which replaced the stock OEM 40GB 4200rpm drive about one year ago.
    I'm not willing to do an Archive and Install at this point as the loss of the WebDAV access to my online volume is not critical. Inconvenient as heck but not to the point where I'm willing (or able) stop my normal work to spend the hours it will take to get WebDAV access back.
    Thanks in advance for any insights.

    same problem here with webdav, I can't mount my idisk from university network on Mac Pro 10.5.3 (although it mounts fine from home network on both ibook and PMG5 10.5.3). Everything was fine with 10.5.2 and I already re-installed 10.5.3 combo. Other bugs as well with .Mac prefs (keeps crashing, sometimes it shows the available space on idisk but still no mounting, with error -35 or -8086), but .Mac sync is OK
    Jun 11 12:34:21 webdavfs_agent[579]: mounting as authenticated user
    Jun 11 12:34:22 kernel[0]: webdav server: http://idisk.mac.com/[username]/: connection is dead
    Jun 11 12:34:22 KernelEventAgent[75]: tid 00000000 received VQ_DEAD event (32)
    Jun 11 12:34:22 kernel[0]: webdav_sendmsg: sock_connect() = 61
    Jun 11 12:34:22 KernelEventAgent[75]: tid 00000000 type 'webdav', mounted on '/Volumes/[username]', from 'http://idisk.mac.com/[username]/', dead
    Jun 11 12:34:22 kernel[0]: webdav_sendmsg: sock_connect() = 61
    Jun 11 12:34:22 KernelEventAgent[75]: tid 00000000 found 1 filesystem(s) with problem(s)
    Jun 11 12:34:22 kernel[0]: webdav_sendmsg: sock_connect() = 61
    Jun 11 12:34:52: --- last message repeated 1 time ---

  • How to generate a report from crm table to find out user status changes

    Dear all,
    Could you please help me on generating a report from SAP CRM table level
    to find out user status changes in crm orders for a specific period of time?
    Thanks in advance,
    Regards,
    Shaik

    Hi Shaik.
    You would not need to write report for this. You need to create a Table view mainenance for the CRMD_ORDERADM_H or CRMD_ORDERADM_I for whichever  you need.
    Follow the below or search on google for more on table view maintenance.
    Go to SE11, give the table name and click on change. Then Go to utilities--> Table maintenance generator.
    In the table maintenance generator screen, you should give Authorization Group,
    Function Group name (Function Group name can be same as table name),
    Maintenance type can be one step or two step, usually you will create with one
    step. You should give maintenance screen number. After clicking on create button,
    a table maintenance generator will be created.
    To check it go to SM30 . In SM30, you find display, Maintain options.
    You can view the table contents by choosing Display and  supplying the selection criteria of dates.
    Regards
    Apoorva

  • ABAP dump on authorization issue

    hello,
    I am not sure if this is the correct forum for this or not.
    I have an ABAP program that was written before I got here that performs the following statement
    <b>OPEN DATASET w_file FOR OUTPUT IN TEXT MODE ENCODING DEFAULT.</b>
    where w_file is a file on the app server. the users that run this program have no issues.
    I have made a copy of the program to add some additional functionality and when the users run this program, the program is abending with the following error messages when trying to execute the same command stated above
    Runtime Error      OPEN_DATASET_NO_AUTHORITY
    Except.               CX_SY_FILE_AUTHORITY
    I have talking to the security person and he is going to make another role with the authorizations needed to run the program but I am curious as to why the same person can run the one program successfully and my program (which does basically the same thing when it comes to the file processing) abends with the authorization issue.
    thanks in advance for your help

    I believe you can use FM to check if user has sufficient authorization.
    NOTE: authority-check uses PROGRAM NAME, so it looks like your profile should be updated with new program name.
    Here is what help says :
                                                                                    Check file access authorization                                                                               
    Functionality                                                                               
    This function module allow you to check the user's authorization to          
        access files (with the key words OPEN DATASET, READ DATASET, TRANSFER and    
        DELETE DATASET). A check should be performed before opening a file.                                                                               
    The authorization check is performed uwing the authorization object          
        S_DATASET.                                                                               
    Description of function parameters:                                                                               
    o  PROGRAM: Name of the ABAP/4 program that contains the file access. If     
           no program name is specified, the system assumes the current program.                                                                               
    o  ACTIVITY: Access type. The possible values are:                                                                               
    -  READ:              Read file                                           
           -  WRITE:             Change file                                         
           -  READ_WITH_FILTER:  Read file with filter function                      
           -  WRITE_WITH_FILTER: Change file with filter function                    
           -  DELETE:            Delete file                                                                               
    o  FILENAME: Name of accessed file                                                                               
    Example                                                                               
    TYPE-POOLS SABC.                                                                               
    CALL FUNCTION 'AUTHORITY_CHECK_DATASET'                                      
             EXPORTING  PROGRAM          = 'ZDATASET'                                
                        ACTIVITY         = SABC_ACT_READ                             
                        FILENAME         = '/tmp/sapv01'                             
             EXCEPTIONS NO_AUTHORITY     = 1                                         
                        ACTIVITY_UNKNOWN = 2.                                                                               
    Notes                                                                               
    The values to be passed as the ACTIVITY are defined as constants in the      
        TYPE-POOL SABC.

  • S_CTS_ADMI Authorization issue

    Hi Experts,
    Every now and again a user sends me a SU53 with the error requesting access to S_CTS_ADMI field TABL. The user of this morning is trying to release a purchase order using transaction ME29N. Why would the SU53 indicate that the user want to maintain the control tables of the Change and Transport System in Production when they are trying to release a purchase order? I am running a trace ST01 but it's not helping.
    Could you please help me to resolve issue.
    Thanks
    Pavel

    Hi
    Gowri is perfectly ok. Below Objects checked.
    M_BEST_BSA
    M_BEST_EKG
    M_BEST_EKO
    M_BEST_WRK
    Along with that M_EINK_FRG also get checked.
    Check for access to all of the above Objects in user master records. Before that check with MM team to get these values of the PO that the approver is trying to release.
    1) Document Type : Relate with M_BEST_BSA
    2) Purchasing Group : Relate to M_BEST_EKG
    3) Purchasing Organization : Relate to M_BEST_EKO
    4) Plant : Relate to M_BEST_WRK
    5) Release code & release Group : Relate to Object M_EINK_FRG
    You also can get these information through ME23N
    If all of the above matches with user master record and PO then there is no further authorization issue. Rest on MM team !!!!!
    Best of luck...
    Arpan

  • Regarding BI Authorization Issue

    Dear Friends,
    can anyone help me to solve this issue..
    I have a Authorization Issue, u201CNO Authorization u201C
    Error : EYE 007 ( Insufficient Authorizations )
    I have follow this stepsu2026
    Steps 1 :-
    Define Authorization-Relevant Characteristics ( ZCUSTOMER )
    Note : I have 0Division values C100 and C200, I want to restrict the user on ZCUSTOMER = 100.
    Steps 2 :-InfoObjects as u201Cauthorization-relevantu201D
    Eg: 0TCAACTVT
    0TCAIPROV
    0TCAVALID
    0TCAKYFNM
    ZCUSTOMER
    Steps 3 :-Using T-code : (RSECADMIN) created the Analysis Object
    For example : ZAUTH In That I have taken
    ZCUSTOMERrestricted with value C100.
    0TCAACTVT with 3 ( Display )
    0TCAIPROV with * ( Astric )
    0TCAVALID with *
    0TCAKYFNM with *
    Steps 4 :-
    Assign Authorizations to Roles
    Use authorization object S_RS_AUTH for the assignment of
    authorizations to roles.
    Maintain the authorizations as values for field BIAUTH
    Ex: ZTESTA1
    S_RS_AUTH
    Here I have given my Authorization Analysis Object ( ZTESTA1) which I have created in RSECADMIN.
    S_RS_COMP
    Activity Create or generate, Change, Display, Delete, Execute <...>
    InfoArea : ZDEMO_ MIHI
    InfoCube : ZCUBET
    Name (ID) of a reporting compo : ZTEST_Q0001
    Type of a reporting component Calculated key figure, Query View, Query, Restricted key figure <...>
    S_RS_COMP
    Activity Create or generate
    InfoArea :ZDEMO_ MIHI
    InfoCube : ZCUBET
    Name (ID) of a reporting compo :ZTEST_Q0001
    Type of a reporting component :Query
    S_RS_COMP1
    Activity Display, Execute
    Name (ID) of a reporting compo : ZTEST_Q0001
    Type of a reporting component :All values
    Owner (Person Responsible) for *
    S_RS_COMP1
    Activity Change, Display, Delete, Execute, Enter, Include, Assign
    Name (ID) of a reporting compo ZTEST_Q0001
    Type of a reporting component All values
    Owner (Person Responsible) for :*
    S_RS_ICUBE
    Activity Create or generate
    Infocube Sub Objects: DATA, Update rules, Data Definition, Aggregats
    InfoArea :ZDEMO_ MIHI
    InfoCube : ZCUBET
    S_RS_IOBC
    Activity Create or generate
    InfoArea :ZDEMO_ MIHI
    Infoarea Catalog : zioc_test, Zkf_test
    S_RS_IOBJ
    Activity Create or generate
    InfoArea :ZDEMO_ MIHI
    InfoObjets: ZCUSTOMER, ZDOCNO,ZMATERIAL
    Steps 5 :-
    AND Assign this Role to User.
    Steps 6 :- ERROR
    When I execute the Report it is showing u201CNO Authorization u201C
    u201C Insufficient Authorization u201C
    EYE 007.
    Regards
    Siva

    Hi,
    In RSECADMIN try to put on the trace with your user id & execute the query . System will give you list of authorization object with red color which needs to be reconsidered in order to execute report without error.
    Hope that helps.
    Regards
    Mr Kapadia

  • TFS 2012 Update 4 - Build Alert - "A build controller or agent's status changes" doesn't work correctly

    We are running TFS2012 Update 4 and have set up some build alerts.  The alert we have set up is "A build controller or agent's status changes".  When this alert is first set up the default filters which are included are for fields "Team
    Project" and "Status".  However through much testing we have discovered that when either of these fields are included as a filter the alert doesn't work.  When other fields are used in the filter the alert works fine (as long
    as neither of the stated fields are included), indeed if all alert filters are removed then the alert also works successfully.  Has anyone else experienced this?  Is there an issue with the fields "Team Project" and "Status"?

    Hi T Quinn,   
    Thanks for your post.
    I reproduced this scenario in my TFS 2012 Update 4 Server and received the same result.
    For this scenario, please submit it to Microsoft Connect Feedback portal at:
    https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio. Microsoft engineers will evaluate them seriously. 
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
    Click
    HERE to participate the survey.

  • User Status change problem in Process Order

    Hi,
    We are in process of upgrading our system from 4.6C to ECC 6.0. I have a problem with User status change for process Orders.
    In 4.6C we are using the profile x with settings:
    10     ZNEW     Created process order     10     90     1     1     ZSTA
    20     ZLCK     Locked process order     20     90     1     1     ZREV
    30     ZOPN     Reopened process order     20     90     1     1     ZOPN
    40     ZMST     MES order started     20     90     1     1     ZMST
    50     ZMCL     MES order closed     20     90     1     1     ZMCL
    90     ZTEC     Technically completed      20     90     1     1     ZTEC
    In ECC 6.0 we also use the same profile settings as above.
    The problem is in ECC 6.0 when I do a goods receipt the User status changes to ZTEC . The process followed is ..Create process order, Release Order, Goods issue, Phase partuial confirmations, Goods receipt and then Finla confirmations of phases. Now in 4.6C if i do the above process the User status remains at ZMST and it only changes to ZTEC when i technically complete the order but in ECC 6.0 when I do a goods recipt from above steps the User status changes to ZTEC. THis should not happen.
    Any pointers will be very helpful.

    Hi,
    The log for production order preliminiary costing is not saved. Therefore, once the order is saved, there is no log available anymore (this is by the way a question of PP; none of the logs is saved).
    Hope that helps...
    Regards,
    Declan

Maybe you are looking for

  • Weblogic (10.3.2) support on Linux 64 bit?

    Hi , Does weblogic 10.3.2 (11gR1) supported on Linux x86_64 ? We are using JRockit version BEA JRockit(R) (build R27.6.5-32_o-121899-1.6.0_14-20091001-2113-linux-x86_64, compiled mode) Can soem body confirm. Thanks, Naveen

  • Mac Still Crashing After Fresh Install of 10.8.

    Hey everyone I have been struggling to determine the issue with my 21.5-inch, Late 2009 iMac.  It has been crashing frequently so I decided to install the OS from scratch and port over the user files but the system is still crashing and I am not sure

  • Macbook Vs iMac

    I know this sounds mental, but with the same speed hardware and memory is the iMac slightly faster then a Macbook because it's a desktop computer?????

  • How to edit an .m4v and save it as an .m4v instead of a .mov?

    I have some .m4v's that I created with Roxio Crunch to watch on my AppleTV. A few of them had letterboxing that I cropped out with QT Pro, but when I try to save it, it wants to save it as a .mov file instead (*****, can't do things like change cover

  • Where can I find out what each of the icons on Apple TV screen represents?

    Where can I find out what each of the icons on Apple TV screen represents? Some cost $$, some are free.Help!