Automatic vendor invoice verification
Dear all,
We have a scenario where in the client wants the payment to done as soon as GRN is done. Wanted to know is it possible in SAP to post the vendor invoice in background automatically on the basis for GRN.
regards,
mahesh.
Hi
You can perform an ERS, once the GR is dopne if you run this transaction the Vendor settlement is carried out.
Please gothrough the link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/EN/a8/b99804452b11d189430000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
Thanks & Regards
Kishore
Similar Messages
-
Cross Company Sales Automatic Vendor Invoice Not Created
Hi,
I have an issue in Cross company Sales Scenario (Inter company Sales),
During the Intercompany Invoice we can trigger output RD04 to create Automatic Vendor Invoice in the Ordering Company.
I have done the necessary configuration for creating Idoc (RD04), FI & MM.
I could able to create an Idoc successfully and the status of the Idoc is 53.
However when I check the Vendor Invoice in the Ordering Company T.Code FBL1N, system gives me message that no items found for the Vendor.
I request please let me know me what configuration I have to do to create Cross Company Sales Automatic Vendor Invoice
Regards,
Murali
Edited by: Murali Mikkili on Jul 27, 2008 9:05 AM
Edited by: Murali Mikkili on Jul 28, 2008 11:49 AMHi Daniel,
Both the company codes should be assigned to the same company.
Clearing accounts must be defined in every company code before a cross-company code transaction may be carried out. The clearing accounts may be G/L accounts, customer, or vendor accounts.
In the configuration you must assign clearing accounts to every possible combination of two company codes to allow cross-company code postings between these combinations
To reduce the number of clearing accounts, you can use just one company code as the clearing company code. In this case, you only have to assign clearing accounts to every combination of the clearing company code
In T-code OBYA
For ex: company code 1000 clearing account 12345 is same for Debit and credit
Company code 2000 Clearing account 67890 is same for debit and credit
Posting keys must be assigned to the clearing accounts to identify their account
types.
Hope this helps you to solve your probelm.
Regards,
Mir -
PO block in vendors invoice verification
Hi all,
whenever we execute an invoice verification selecting by vendor, any PO of this vendor results blocked for modification .
Even if we de-select the position, ALL PO are blocked.
Is there any way round this, still using the vendor for Invoice verification ? (we usually have a very long list of PO so the vendor is a really good parameter)
Thanks a lot in advance
Cheers
Audeduplicated
-
How does an invoice verification process happen in SAP FI and what are all the steps?
Hi Swapnil,
Its as simple:
1) For PO based invoice when the accountant/supply guy does invoice booking through MIRO he would check that the invoice quantity and rate etc match the PO quantiy and rate. So this is called invoice verification and posting.
2) For non-PO based invoice what would you verify? It is just booking.
Regards,
Prasad -
Vendor Invoice verification payment terms
Hi Experts,
PO is having one item with Gross price,freight .
Freight vendor is different from main vendor.
Main vendor-PAYMENT TERMS-1% discount- 5 days
Freight vendor--PAYMENT TERMS- pay immidiatly
After making GRN and when i tried to post invoice in MIRO
for freight vendor,system is not calculating as per payment terms of freight vendor and showing 1%discount as in main vendor payment terms
Let me know how system can calculate freight value with out discount .
I tried simuating invoice with PO reference,Vendor reference also in MIRO.
Thanks ,
RamaHi
Payment terms are defined in the PO at header level and hence the system takes the payment terms of the regular vendor for the freight vendor also.
Check whether payment terms can be given at item level.
If not possible then change the payment terms for the freight vendor manually while doing MIRO .
while doing MIRO select PO reference and also planned delivery costs selection.
Revert with ur comments..
Reg
Raja -
GL account determination for vendor invoice in cross company sale sales
Hi
we are planning to implement cross company sales scenario.
High level design-
1) Sales Order is in co code X and the delivery is from group company lets say co code Y
2) The delivery from co code Y generates two invoices- one in Sales area of co code X for the final customer and 2nd in sales area of co code Y for the inter company
3) The intercompany invoice has EDI output type (Sap standard delivered object is RD04). The output generates a IDOC which has ability to post automatic vendor invoice in co code X crediting the inter company vendor Y.
4) The automatic vendor invoice GL account determination is via customisation OBCB and OBCE
I have some questions around this , particularly if in the vendor invoice we have to account for material and returnable packaging
In my current project there would FG packed in returnable packaging in co code Y
For Export there would be a dedicated co code(X).
Co code X gets orders from customers; and creates sales orders in its sales area with delivery plant of co code Y.
Along with FG returnable packaging is also charged as deposit by - co code X to customer and Co code Y to Co code X.
so in the vendor invoice how to generate the following entry
Inter company vendor 150 Cr
Cost of Goods sold 100 Dr
Returnable Packages deposit 50 Dr.
Similarly when the end customer returns the packaging generate the following entry via the cross company return order and intercompany invoice
intercompany vendor 50 Dr
Returnable packages 50 Cr
if you have worked on this kind of scenario and share how to customise to post for FG and Returnable packaging separately in the automatic vendor invoice it would be great.
Edited by: pravin_shah1403 on Nov 25, 2011 3:00 PMHi Pravin.
Did you figure this out?
I'm seeing that via OBCB we can hit only one G/L account.
We also need to hit multiple accounts.
We've figured out how to hit this via user-exit, however I'm hoping that I've missed something in configuration and that a resolution via configuration is possible?
Any ideas? -
Inbound idoc failure(vendor invoice not posted)
Hi All,
we have two SAP systems. SAP A and SAP B.
SAP A is the vendor for SAP B system we have created a sales order/delivery/out bound invoice in SAP A system.The sales order has BOM material with main item and sub items. We have the same material master data and BOM master data in system A and system B since we are following split architecture.
The outbound invoice(with main and sub item) in system A has generated an outbound idoc and the idoc has gone to SAP
system B. There are the usual segments like E1EDP01 for main item and another E1EDp01 for the sub itmes in the outbound
idoc.The message type is INVOIC and basic type INVOIC02 with no extension.
In system B, the inbound idoc (coming from system A) has failed giving the error message "higher level items not allowed". The
segment E1EDP01 for sub item is highlighted in red ! basically the inbound idoc in sap system B is posting a vendor
invoice since the inbound idoc in B is calling the FM IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_MRM... I think this is doing vendor invoice
verification.
I have checked in system A, all is ok and the outbound idoc is ok but the issue is in sap system B, the inbound idoc has failed
with message "higher level items not allowed". The segment E1EDP01 for sub item is highlighted in red in inbound idoc in
system B. The segments are the same for inbound idoc in B and outbound idoc in A.
Can someone pls tell what is wrong in system B.(config or data issue) as we are managing both systems.
regdsHi,
I am not sure if we can send both main and sub items thorugh inbound invocie idoc to create vendor invoice.
you can try to post the idoc by removing main items from the IDoc in WE19.
one more thing you should aware is you are not allowed to to create two E1EDP01 segements for the same PO item(E1EDP02).
check this as well.
Regds, -
Idoc in error while trying to post vendor invoice(higher items not allowed)
Hi All,
we have two SAP systems. SAP A and SAP B.
SAP A is the vendor for SAP B system we have created a sales order/delivery/out bound invoice in SAP A system.The sales order has BOM material with main item and sub items. We have the same material master data and BOM master data in system A and system B since we are following split architecture.
The outbound invoice(with main and sub item) in system A has generated an outbound idoc and the idoc has gone to SAP
system B. There are the usual segments like E1EDP01 for main item and another E1EDp01 for the sub itmes in the outbound
idoc.The message type is INVOIC and basic type INVOIC02 with no extension.
In system B, the inbound idoc (coming from system A) has failed giving the error message "higher level items not allowed". The
segment E1EDP01 for sub item is highlighted in red ! basically the inbound idoc in sap system B is posting a vendor
invoice since the inbound idoc in B is calling the FM IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_MRM... I think this is doing vendor invoice
verification.
I have checked in system A, all is ok and the outbound idoc is ok but the issue is in sap system B, the inbound idoc has failed
with message "higher level items not allowed". The segment E1EDP01 for sub item is highlighted in red in inbound idoc in
system B. The segments are the same for inbound idoc in B and outbound idoc in A.
Can someone pls tell what is wrong in system B.(config or data issue) as we are managing both systems.
regds
Edited by: sapsd73 on Jul 9, 2010 3:26 PM
Edited by: sapsd73 on Jul 9, 2010 3:27 PMI do not see any reason why you would need to use COND_A04 if COND_A01 is working.
What if you could get COND_A04 to post and you would face the same result as in COND_A01?
If SAP does not check wrong values, then you have to do it yourself, or you report an incident at SAP (after you have searched for OSS notes that may have fixed this error already)
For example OSS Note 1169998 - IDoc: KONP-LIFNR values not checked
fixed a situation where the vendor number was not validated. -
Control invoice verification after quality inspection
Dear all,
I want to restrict vendor invoice verification to be done after quality notification, I set QM control key 0007: Del. release, invoice block in the QM view of material master, then I post GR for a PO with inspection lot created, then I did invoice verification through MIRO it was successful without even a warning message.
Does anybody know how to control this?
Thx
DannyHi Danny,
MIRO will be processed, but you will get message as "Blocked for Payment". You can see the reason for block and clear the block in MRBR. Ensure that in PO indicator GR-Based Invoice Verification is flagged.
For more details Block the payment if inspection lot is not cleared by quality
Thanks & Regards,
Ramagiri -
Service-Based Invoice Verification indicator setup automatically
Hi,
How to get the Service-Based Invoice Verification indicator setup automatically when a user tries to create a PO. There is no service master being setup for the sevices carried out.
Bascially the requisiitons are created through Projects based on the services performed and when the PO is created for the same the users forgets to have this indicator checked because of which there are problems which arises going ahead.
We would like to have this indicator setup automatcially so that even if the user - Buyer forgets we dont get problems going ahead.
Answers for this question will be highly appreciated.
regards,
AndyHi
You need to set this indicator in vendor master, however if you do not enter item category as D, it will not come default in purchase order. Checking the service based IV in vendor master indicates IV can be done for that vendor with reference to services.
Thanks
Edited by: Praveen Raghavendra on Jan 9, 2009 1:17 PM -
Requirement for getting the VAT Taxes automatically from the vendor invoice
Dear All,
We Have a Requirement for getting the VAT Taxes automatically from the vendor invoice in to the Sales invoice after invoice verification process.Is this feasible?. Can anybody explain how this can be done to overcome this issue.
Thanking you,
Best regards,
R.Srinivasanhi,
technically i do not think tht can be done. but even from functional part its incorrect in the sense tht the values on which tax is calculated in purchase may be very different from tht in sales. so we may never get the correct picture.
saurabh -
Clear Down payment against Vendor Invoice through Automatic Payment Program
Hi
We have to adjust vendor invoice against down payment (Advance) made through automatic payment program (F110)
Please guide us is there any configuration require to consider Down payment transactions during F110 to clear against Vendor Invoice
Ex :1. Advance payment made through special GL indicator 50K.
2. Invoice document 75K posted in vendor.
3. Now we have to clear down payment made (50K) against 75K through F110.
Regards
SreenivasuluHi srinivasulu,
First u create down payment request through F-47 and define the spl gl indicator for down payment and assign the gl account for down payment gl code..
Regards,
Nivas -
Query on Procurement and Invoice Verification for Purchase Scheme by Vendor
Dears,
This is K.Hari Hara Ganesh.
I have a query.
Scenario
Vendor commits us if the Purchasing Qty is 200 Kgs for a Material, then 10 Kgs will be given Free of Cost. If it is lesser than 200, no free.
Once received, my Stock should be updated for 210 Kgs, wheras I have to pay the Vendor for 200 Kgs.
How this scenario is handled in SAP ?
If anybody can give me Step by Step creation till Configuration, Master Maintenance, PO, GR, Invoice Verification and Payment by explanation or screen shots, it will be helpful for me.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
K.Hari Hara GaneshDear Nisha,
Thank you very much for the immediate response.
You have asked me to create 2 line items.
Still I have some doubts
1. Is it possible to create the same Material as 2 line items, first line with 200 Kgs and the second line with 10 Kgs for the same Material.
2. Also, my Purchase Tolerance is 2 %, which means for the PO Qty 200 Kgs, I should not accept more than 204 Kgs (200 + 4)
3. Since the 10 Kgs is the scheme given by the Vendor, my system should accept 210 Kgs, irrespective of my Purchase Toleranace.
I will be very happy, if I receive the solution for this scenario too.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
K.Hari Hara Ganesh -
Vendor Invoice - Outgoing Payment -How to apply cash discount automatically
Hi Folks,
My Vendor is 400000 - whose payment terms is : 0002
I posted a vendor invoice using FB60 :
where i checked the payment terms is 0002 3% Cash Discount within 14 days
2% Cash discount within 30 days
Net within 45 dats
Default for Baseline date : Posting Date.
My Document Date and Posting date are both same: Invoice Document and posting date : 07/31/2008
I tried to make a payment using F-53, where the Cash Discount is not applying automatically. It is asking me to manually enter the cah discount @ 3%.
What should i do to make cash discount apply automatically.
Thanks and Help will be surely rewarded.
MatthewHello I just checked in my system it is automatically picking even if I am not taking the discount....check the payment terms....
ex : I have invoice for 500 with payment terms 1% discount
When I pay 500 in F-53 the system is showing me the net amount 495.
When I pay 495 the system is also showing me the net amount of 495
You might want to have a look at the payment terms.......
Make sure when you enter the amount in F-53 and press "Process Open Items", you have the discount percent populated automatically in the CashD% field.
Thanks
Harish
Edited by: Harish R on Aug 1, 2008 3:19 PM -
Vendor invoice and logistic invoice verification ?
Good morning Guru,
What is the difference between "vendor invoice" in accounting module and "logistic invoice verification" in MM module ?
I know logistic invoice verification to validate between po, gr and invoice, but what vendor invoice for ?
Thank'sHi
Accounting-wise both has the same result as in both the scenarios you can debit expense and credit vendor. The advantage of Logistics Invoice Verification over Vendor Invoice is, in Logistics Invoice verification, we have three way matching of documents ie PO,GR and Invoice. So if there is any mismatch between these, the invoice will get blocked for payment. Also it checks for accuracy between PO and invoice and GR and invoice, so that the expenses are accounted accurately and price diff account also effected appropriately.
In Vendor invoice booking, it is just like your normal journal entry and so it has not got that much authenticity over the correctness of transactions. In vendor invoice booking, there is every possibility of duplicate booking of invoice, whereas in LIV, the invoice will get blocked for payment.
Hope it is clear.
Regards,
K Lakshmanan
Maybe you are looking for
-
Replacing special characters from xml document/text inside element
Hi Is there any way to replace the xml codes to special characters inside an entire xml document/ for a text in element. I want to get the xml codes to get replaced to respective special character(for any special character) Please see the sample xml
-
Help required in identifying Line Charges in Sales Order Lines
Dear All, I want to know the column or calculation used for retrieving Line Charges present in sales order->Line_items->Pricing tab. Thanks and Regards, Mahesh
-
If server certificate expired, can that give my client SSLHandshakeExceptio
If a servers certificate has expired, can that give my client a SSLHandshakeException? javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: PKIX path building failed: sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderExcepti
-
Compressed Project won't fit on DVD
I edited a FCP project that ended up timing at 1hr. 59 minutes, and 27 seconds. I exported the project using Compressor, and chose my presets as MPEG-2 120min High Quality encode (choosing "All" for both video and audio). I then brought this into DVD
-
Integrate Biller Direct 6.02 with Portal 7.0
Hello Gurus, I am using Biller Direct 6.02 and my Portal is EP 7.0. What is the best way to integrate Biller Direct from Portal. Regards Deb [Points guranteed for helpful answers]