Integrated Configuration Multiple receiver

Hi All,
I have a requirement where there is Single Sender and 2 Receivers
I am aware that this cannot be done using single Integrated Configuration(ICO) in PI 7.1
But considering the volume and frequency of data we want to go for ICO, even multiple ICO is fine.
Scenario is::
Sender: File(FTP)
Receivers: SOAP(Transformation) and File(passthrough)
Let me know if any workaround is possible, so that I can do it using ICO itself.
Thanks

A workaround:
You could create two ICOs with two separate sender file adapters( using same IR/ESR - design - objects)
First file sender adapter would pick file from one folder and archive it to another
And the other file sender adapter can then pick file from the archived folder and re-archive it to third folder
Or, you could let the first file adapter rename file and have the second file adapter pick file from same folder
rgds

Similar Messages

Integrated Configuration- Problem occurred in receiver agreement for sender

Hi , I am using AAE in PI 7.1 and it is proxy to file scenrios.
When Ia m doing testing in Integration Directory in test configuration its giving me this error .
Problem occurred in receiver agreement for sender -<ECCBUSINESSSYSTEM> to receiver -BS_D_EPS,http://abc.com/sap/pi/HR/Qualifications.Qualifications_Async_Out: No receiver agreement found for , -<ECCBUSINESSSYSTEM> , BS_D_EPS, http://abc.com/sap/pi/HR/Qualifications, Qualifications_Async_Out
( here it should take interface Qualifications_Async_In, but logs says it is pointing to outbound interface)
here when I am going in to trace logs then it seems that are not able to understand the receiver interface . rather then it is taking sender inface in logs..
In trace logs . I am getting
Receiver Determination
<Not found>
<Trace level="1" type="B">CL_RD_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">R E C E I V E R - D E T E R M I N A T I O N </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T"> Cache Content is up to date </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Start with given receiver - BS_D_EPS </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Using Receiver Determination 00000000000000000000000000000000 </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">No Relation found - accept given Receivers. </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">...extracting Receiver from Header: BS_D_EPS </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Classic Receiver Determination via Rules. </Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">...create rule engine </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">No Receiver found behaviour: 0 </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Number of Receivers:1 </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="E">CL_RD_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
Interface Determination
<Not found>
<Trace level="1" type="B">CL_ID_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">I N T E R F A C E - D E T E R M I N A T I O N </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T"> Cache Content is up to date </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">...There is no Interface Determination configured for receiver party and receiver service BS_D_EPS </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Check conditions for (Inb: Party Srvc If) BS_D_EPS Qualifications_Async_Out </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">...valid InbIf without Condition: Qualifications_Async_Out </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Number of receiving Interfaces:1 </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="E">CL_ID_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
Operation Mapping
<Not found>
<Trace level="1" type="B">CL_MAPPING_XMS_PLSRV3-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">......attachment XI_Context not found </Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Mapping already defined in interface determination </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">No mapping configured </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="E">CL_MAPPING_XMS_PLSRV3-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
I have developed the other integrated configuration scenario and this is working fine .
please let me know how can I troubleshoot it

I am using sender as Soap and receiver as File adapter.
here the problem is that while going for interface deteremination and receiver agreement it is calling to Outbound interface .
It should call the inbound interface. I put all the details correctly and deleted all the objects and crated again for both Ir and Id..
I put the name of inbound interface in configuration but while executing its calling outbound interface.

Multiple Receiver Interface in integrated config(AAE)

Hello Experts,
We have a SOAP to RFC synchronous interface.There is a requirement where we have a Single Sender interface(Single Sender System) and based on the value in Payload we have to select either of two different Receiver RFC interface(Single receiver System). I am not sure whether we can select either of two different RFC interface for the same Receiver system in an Integrated Configuration(AAE).
Appreciate your help!!!
Thanks.

Hi,
Alternatively, you can opt to use multi-mapping, with the occurrences of each message set to 0..1. The interface is triggered via conditions. In ID, you would be declaring an Enhanced Interface Determination.
Hope this helps,

Integration Engine -- Configure Sender/Receiver ID

All,
I'm trying to configure senders and receivers (using SAP PI 7.1) in order to prioritize messages afterwards...
My SAP ECC 6.0 system will send idocs (= business system) and my receiver is a business component.
Configuring my send is no problem. Idoc structure and namespace appear in the sender interface tab, bu when I want to configure my business component as a receiver, no interfaces appear in the list.
Only the following is appearing in the Receiver Interface list:
NAME                   NAMESPACE
InterfaceCollection http://sap.com/xi/XI/System
When I check my business component in the IB Directory, sender and receiver interfaces are clearly mentioned.
Can business components be used to configure senders and receivers?
Did I forget something?
Please advise.
Thanks a lot
Dimitri

Hi Udo,
I have a receiver agreement with the following information:
Sender:
SEDCLNT312 (SAP ECC system SED client 312)
Receiver:
   component: BC_EAI (business component)
   interface: SI_IN_DIMONAO_A
   namespace: http://www.securex.be/MF0401/DimonaOut
Then I go to Configure Sender/Receiver ID and choose BC_EAI as service.
I manually type in the namespace and the interface, but then I get an error saying
"SI_IN_DIMONAO_A is not an interface" (Exception of class CX_XMS_WRONG_INPUT)
ps: do you think the problem is solved when I use third-party business systems instead?
Thanks
Dimitri
Edited by: Dimitri Sannen on Jun 3, 2009 2:16 PM
I think I found the error: I manually added both interface and namespace and then the error is triggered.
But when I added the interface and then I put " * " for the interface, no error appears. Also the other way around, * for interface and namespace filled in.
I must test this in order to be sure this works.
Edited by: Dimitri Sannen on Jun 3, 2009 2:46 PM
When I test with a Business System as receiver, the same this happens.
I cannot indicate any receiver interface. So the same phenomenon with both a business component and business system.
Can it be this is a bug?

Integrated Configuration - AAE - Monitoring

Hello All
I am trying to understand how Integrated Configuration works in the runtime and things look rather neat to me with my scenario working.
But monitoring this in the RWB, few questions cropped up, which I hope someone can help answer:
1. Inbound and Outbound Payload Monitoring
When message get processed within the Integration Engine, we can see the input payload and also the output of the mapping. In the case of the Integrated Configuration, is this not possible? I don't see any new special window open and hence how is the monitoring of the various steps specifically input and output done?
2. Mapping Trace not accessible
To further analyze what is new, we put a few standard XI trace steps into the mapping to see where these traces are displayed in the runtime. We thought it would be a part of the Audit Log, but it is not. Has anyone experience with how trace (custom mapping trace using the AbstractTrace object ) can be used with Integrated Configuration or is that another limitation with PI 7.1 and the Integrated Configuration?
To me these two are major requirements as a application developer to do my development and support and hence am wondering whether to gain performance have these options been eliminated or is there some set up needed on the server which we have missed.
Thoughts , ideas welcome.
Regards
Bhavesh
PS : You know what my questions to the Subject Matter Experts at the Bangalore teched are going to be

Hello Rodrigo,
Regarding monitoring of different versions of the message processed by means of AAE, this is unfortunately not possible in PI 7.1x - message is persisted only once in such scenarios (after receiver/interface determination). Multiple persistence of the processed message in Java stack is only available in 7.3x - there you have options for configurable staging (property xiadapter.stage.conf of J2EE service XPI Adapter: XI) and logging (property xiadapter.logger.conf of J2EE service XPI Adapter: XI) of the message so that several versions of the message (e.g. before mapping and after mapping) can be observed (incl. these versions' payloads). Technically, it is possible to setup staging/logging for different processing steps (namely stages - analogue of pipeline services in classical Integration Engine processing) - but, as I said, in 7.3x and not in 7.1x.
Speaking about creation of custom audit log entries, did you check SAP standard AuditMessageKey and AuditAccess for this? (http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwpi711/helpdata/en/3b/6fe540b1278631e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm)
Regards,
Vadim

Integrated Configuration transport error

Hi,
I just transported an Integrated Configuration from DVE system to the QA and the IC in the QAS is not configured correclty.
PI 7.1
My IC have multiple operations and 2 receivers.
The Receivers System were translated correctly (SYSDVE > SYSQA) however the operations and the operation mapping were not correct when activated in QA.
In DVE Operation1 pointed to Receiver1, but in QAS my Operation1 is associated with Receiver2.
Anyone had a similar issue?
Regards,
Martin

Thanks for the answer Mickael.
The receivers are Business System. Everything seems well configured in the SLD. We did many transport without any problems, but it's the first time we transport Integrated Configuration.
I noticed that in my Integrated Configuration, the configuration is fine under the 'Receiver' tab for all of the operations, it's only under the 'Receiver Interfaces' that the Receiver Systems is not properly configured for the operations...

How to configure multiple smtp servers per domain

Hi,
how do we configure multiple smtp servers per domain/corporate in iplanet messaging server 5.2. i wanted to do this so that i can configure some domains with virus scanning and some domains without antivirus.

Hi Martin,
Well we are trying to run a report without exactly specifying the name of reports server anywhere, e.g. in database or in form or anywhere else. Now if I do not supply a reports server name using RUN_REPORT_OBJECT, the error it displays is FRM-41211: Integration Error : SSL failure ... However if I specify the reports server name in the form, the reports run perfect. Also the name of reports server is specified in rwservlet.properties.
Now the question goes as follows:
Can I run my report from Form without specifying the name of the Reports server anywhere at all. This is so because either an in-process reports server should be picked or the one which is entered in rwservlet.properties should be pickec up by default. Please correct us if we are wrong. once we are through with it, we have to move to Oracle 10gR2 concept of reports server.
Thanks in anticipation,
Ruchi/Saurabh

How to configure multiple report servers in Oracle 10 G R2?

I want to configure multiple report servers with my application deployed on Oracle 10G R2. Since R2 does not support report server clustering, how can this be achieved without any change in the application?
Currently, the application is running with single report server.

Hi Martin,
Well we are trying to run a report without exactly specifying the name of reports server anywhere, e.g. in database or in form or anywhere else. Now if I do not supply a reports server name using RUN_REPORT_OBJECT, the error it displays is FRM-41211: Integration Error : SSL failure ... However if I specify the reports server name in the form, the reports run perfect. Also the name of reports server is specified in rwservlet.properties.
Now the question goes as follows:
Can I run my report from Form without specifying the name of the Reports server anywhere at all. This is so because either an in-process reports server should be picked or the one which is entered in rwservlet.properties should be pickec up by default. Please correct us if we are wrong. once we are through with it, we have to move to Oracle 10gR2 concept of reports server.
Thanks in anticipation,
Ruchi/Saurabh

In Multimapping how can we configure the Receiver , Interface Deter for BPM

Hi Friends ,
I am trying the the BPM scenario using Integration Process
BpmPatternCollectTime
from SAP BASIS ® SAP BASIS 7.00 in the namespace http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/Patterns
I have done the scenario like the above . I have followed all the Steps which are used in above scenario.
I am using a File Sender Adapter and Receiver Adapter .
It is Successfully picked up the File but nothing is happening after that .
I am using two receiver Determination one from Ob to IP and other from IP to FIleReceiver ( IB) .
But, I am Getting error as Block1 (No agent) Error in the PE graphical diagram
I have checked in SWWL my Integration Process Return code is "0"
The steps Which i have followed in BPM are
1. Block with Deadlkine branch and Exception handler( as TimeOut Exception)
Block Start and Block End as New Transaction
2. Inside Block infinite Loop which contains Receive step ( Actives the Correlation ) and Multiline Container element which appends the Messages with CollectMessage
3. Transformation Step
It creates the New Transaction and Interface Maping from CollectMessage List to New Mesage
4. Send Step
It sends the New Message . It creates the New Transaction .
Can you Please tell me how to configure the Receiver and Interface Determination for the above scenario ?
Regards.,
V.Rangarajan

Hi Ranga
have a look at these
you can ref: this link to find example where a receiver determination step is used in BPM- http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/43/6211b11c895f6ce10000000a1553f6/content.htm
More abt RD step in BPM - http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/14/d5283fd0ca8443e10000000a114084/content.htm
if useful pls reward

Error during sync integrated configuration - incoming payload missed

Hi guys,
we are suing PI 7.11 and trying to use the new feature integrated configuration wherever possible.
Now I test a sync szeanrio where sender is SOAP and receiver is RFC.
The messages fails in SOAP Sender channel with the error that there is no suitable receiver found for this message.
During integrated configuration content based routing is used.
com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException: com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException: Receiver Determination failed for message e54dba61-9ded-11de-801a-020000000038(OUTBOUND)
But the message fails without persisting the payload, so I could check what value is missing in the receiver rules.
Furthermore the message is only displayed in the sender chanel and is not shown in rwb
While using the normal way of messsage processing where the integration server is involved, such errors are persisted and the payload is also available.
Is that the normal behaviour of integrated configurations.
Could the behaviour be parametrized?
Any help appreciated
Kind regards
Jochen

Hi,
thanks for helping.
Because of integrated configuration the integration server is passed and there is no entry in sxmb_moni.
I already tried this blog, but it doesn´t work for me.
I changed the parameter according to the blog.
But the message content of sync messages are stilled deleted.
Does the parameter changed requires restart of adapter engine or complete java stack?
There two templates one called 'Usage_Type_all_in_One' and above there is an node named equal to the server node name. The parameter of which template have to be changed.
I tried both with out success.
Hopefully you could help me using this feature
Kind regards
Jochen

ABAP Proxy sender possible in integrated configuration AAE with PI 7.11

Hi guys,
we are running PI 7.11.
We have serveral scenarios where the senderis an ABAP proxy and the receiver is reached by a jave adapter.
With Ehp1 the SOAP adapter offers the possibilty to chose XI 3.0 as message protocol.
We use this feature already in scenarios where ABAP proxy is receiver.
But is it also possible to use it at sender side?
Kind regards
Jochen

Hi Volker,
thanks for your help.
You could also use ABAP proxy at sender side during integrated configuration.
Prerequisite is to implement SAP note 1349125 and use following url for acessing the PI from SAP backends.
http://<host>:<port>/XISOAPAdapter/MessageServlet?ximessage=true
With this URL you could ABAP proxies in normal scenarios where integration server is involved as well as in integrated configurations.
Kind regards
Jochen

PI 7.1 Integrated Configuration for AAE - Issue Accessing Attachment

Hello All,
PI 7.1 in its new features allows access to the Attachment using UDF's withing Graphical Mapping.
Tried this feature and works good in Graphical mappings; am able to access the Attachment; and write it into a Field on my target. This works with the standard XI pipeline steps of passing message from AE to IE back to AE.
When trying to use the same set up with the Advanced Adapter Engine, - Integrated Configuration; this feature doesn't seem to work and the mapping run time triggers a Null Pointer Exception.
None of the SAP documentation discusses this as a limitation of AAE and hence am wondering if this is a bug or is this a limitation? Has anyone on the forum tried this?
Regards
Bhavesh

Hi Bhavesh,
I also tried this scenario long back when PI7.1 was in Rampup mode. We tried and first part was working fine as you also written, but in second part we got stuck. After some research, we found that we cannot configure additional communication scenarios that contain, for example payload-based routing or a message split, with Integrated Configuration. You must define separate receiver determinations, interface determinations, and communication agreements to configure communication scenarios of this type. We can only configure communication scenarios where message is transfered withing AAE.
MAy be you need to check the receiver interfaces and Mappings or may somthing missing there.Also check for authorized Service User.
Possibilities are like something missing is in Integrated Configuration but not sure.
Regards
Aashish Sinha

Integrated Configuration in PI 7.1

Hi All,
I am using 3 BAPIS at the receiving side out of which 1 BAPI will be picked as per the condition in the condition editor.
1.So,do I need to tick the "Sender Uses Virtual Receiver" check-box in the "Integrated Configuration" section
2.But when I go for creating the "Integrated Configuration"section without ticking the "Sender Uses Virtual Receiver" check-box ,
it gives me the error that it is already assigned to the object;conflicting direct connections,sender agreements,or integrated configurations are not permitted.
3.I have configured the Sender Agreement,Receiver Agreement before the "Integrated Configuration" section.So,what shall I do?Shall I tick the "Sender Uses Virtual Receiver" check-box in the "Integrated Configuration" section ?
Thanks in advance.

Hi ,
Thanks for the reply.
Actually I am having the Process Order coming in the source with 5 to 6 relevant fields.Out of these Process Order fields Status is one of the fields.Based on the the StatuS field the BAPIs will be called at the receiver.So can I skip Integrated Configurations as I am imposing the condition on the data in the payload(Source Structure) as Integrated configuration will not be helpful in my scenerio.?
Or shall I skip Sender Agreement ,Receiver Agreement?
Also,in PI 7.1 Integration Directory there is one section as "Value Mapping Group".I suppose that it is used if and only if value mapping is used.But I am not using any kind of value mapping so can I skip that section?
Thanks in advance.
Edited by: Shweta Kullkarni on Aug 19, 2009 5:19 AM

Integrated Configuration - Possible for this scenario?

Hi experts,
Could you please tell me if Integrated Configuration would work in this scenario, if so could you please tell me how.
A file is read and accordingly a RFC call is made. The response of the RFC is used to determine receivers. The receivers are other RFC's and IDoc's to different systems.
I was planning to use the receiver determination step in BPM to achieve this.
I am on PI 7.11
Thank you.
Radhika.

> Could you please tell me if Integrated Configuration would work in this scenario, ...
No. You cannot use IC in combination with BPM.

Integrated configuration (PI 7.1) throws error when do 'Test Configuration'

I am doing Proxy to Web Service (SOAP) sync scenario. We are using Integrated Configuration. After created integrated configuration and test this from (Tools --> Test Configuration) it throws the following error at the receiver agreement step.
Sender Agreement - Green
Receiver Determination - Green
Interface Determination - Green
Operation Mapping - Green
Receiver Agreement - Red.
Problem occurred in receiver agreement for sender -DR4400_D to receiver -ESRI,urn:AssetManagement.AddressManagementSearchCapabilitiesFromECC_Out: No standard agreement found for , DR4400_D, , ESRI, urn::AssetManagement, AddressManagementSearchCapabilitiesFromECC_Out

Test Configuration cannot be used to test Integrated Configuration Scenario.....refer my reply here:
Re: Integrated Configuration in PI7.1
Regards,
Abhishek.

Integrated Configuration Multiple receiver

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for