Limit Order Confirmation

Classic Scenario - SRM 4.00
Does anybody knows how are Limit Order Confirmations being transferred to the backend? Although the G/R & Service Entry Sheet are in the backend we can't find any IDoc for the document.
Are confirmations for Limit Orders being transferred in a different way than the normal Purchase Orders? 
Any advice would be very much appreciated!

Hi
<b>Incase you want to do any enhancement or changes to the Limit Order Data before the order gets created in the R/3 Back-end...
Use the following BADIs to do that job.</b>
BBP_CREATE_PO_BACK                 OLD Exit while creating a PO in the backend system
BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI          ECS: PO Transfer to Logistics Backend
BBP_CREATE_BE_PO_NEW     Exit while creating a purchase order in the backend system
Hope this will help.
Please reward suitable points.
Regards
- Atul

Similar Messages

  • Limit Order Confirmation Reversal - Balancing Issues

    Hello,
    We currently use SRM 5.5 and have an issue with the balances on our goods receipts and service entries for limit orders.
    We use ML81N to reverse off our service entry sheets but it is still leaving balances on the goods receipt which appears to be caused by the invoice values.
    For example we have a limit PO that has had the following happen:
    Confirmation posted in SRM for £3390.00 which transferred successfully to the backend PO.
    Invoice posted for £3371.70
    Service entry revoked and deleted using ML81Nu2013 SEN balance is zero
    Goods receipt balance is £18.30, only the value of £3371.70 has been reversed but before saving the service entry reversal the value in ML81N did show as £3390.00. So for some reason it is picking up the invoice value and reversing that instead of the goods receipt value.
    Does anyone know why this is happening and a way to get rid of the balance on the goods receipt now that the service entry sheet is deleted?
    Thanks
    Lisa

    Hi. This is probably more of a LIV / MM issue than SRM, but transaction MR11 will clear the GR/IR imbalance for you if there is no other way. It effectively posts a document like a dummy GR or invoice for the balance. It obviously won't try and pay anything to anyone.
    Regards,
    Dave.

  • Limit Orders - Confirmations Vs Invoice Only

    Hello,
    We are using SRM 5.0 and currently have confirmation and invoice set for our limit orders.
    We have various issues with this so I am looking at removing the confirmation option and using the invoice only method. We mainly use limit orders for paying our electricity/telephone bills etc.
    Does any one else use the invoice only option and if so do you have workflow approval or use an alternative, i.e. off-line method for the approval of the invoice or no approval at all? The confirmation is currently acting like an approval/check before the invoice is posted and it is a risk to post the invoice without some sort of approval.
    Any feedback including issues surrounding this would be very useful as Iu2019m struggling to find any good information on limit orders and their functionality.
    Many Thanks
    Lisa Pallas

    Have you tried to create a screen variant (tx SHD0). Search for the proper program and screen. You the have the posibility to hide fields in the screen. The advantage to make use of screen variant is that it is independent of a release upgrade.
    Regards,
    Paulo

  • Limit order confirmations

    Hi All,
    I have an issue with the limit service order, confirmations which were made to it are not replicating in R/3 PO history.
    Can any one have the idea about whether we can make the confirmations for a service PO after its's time period.
    Example: One PO is created in SRM for about a value of 10k, and the time frame is 10.8.2007 to 10.12.07, for this PO can I make the confirmation now in SRM or not?
    please suggest me...
    Thanks in adance,
    Regards,
    Krish.

    Hi Krish,
    Definitely i would like to help you but some more information is required about the scenario and the data you were working on -
    1. In can make out from the information provided by you that you are working on ECS. Inform which scenario you are working on ?
    2. Is the service a backe end service or a local service ?
    3. In case of P.O created for back end service using a backend P.org & P.group then the confirmation should definitely create a Service entry sheet in backend R/3 once its is approved through an IDOC.
    4. Check for error logs in BBP_PD, SLG1 & RZ20 (Application monitor) for getting a better picture about the error.
    Also check whether the programme which updates the status BBP_GET_STATUS_2 is working fine or not.
    5. In case you could not find out anything look at WE09 (IDOC list) for the status of the IDOC for that particular confirmation and check for the error messages there.
    Please update us with the above information for further help.
    Otherwise it is difficult to pinpoint what exactly is the issue.
    Award points for helpful answers.
    Rgds,
    Teja

  • Account Assignment category in Limit order confirmations in SRM 4.0

    Hello
    We are using SRM 4.0 in extended classic scenario.
    When entering the confirmations for limit orders in SRM, users add the limit/ service items.
    After SP14 recently, the " account assignment category" is not set in the added lines , same as the
    PO .
    Rather the account assignment category is the first one from the available list.
    Any suggestions / notes for this issue?
    Regards
    Kedar

    Hi,
    1. In customising (SPRO) in R/3 you need to create the corrpesponding account assignment category with the relevant fields specified.
    2. In customising (SPRO) in SRM you need to create the new account assignment category and specify it as active plus the backend system reference. You can then assign the cost assignment types that are applicable and those that are mandatory.
    I haven't got access to a system at the minute so can't give you the menu paths in customising but for R/3 it is under Materials Management > Purchasing and then look for Account Assignment. For SRM it is in Cross Application Components and then look for Account Assignment.
    Regards
    Chris

  • Limit Order & SAP note 1355894

    Hi,
    We are running SRM 550 at SP13, SAP have released a note 1355894 in SP16 that seems to imply that the category type for a Limit order should be B = Limit not D = Service.  That seems logical?
    Our current system configuration enters an S, and although in general this works OK, we do occasionally have an issue when a user tries to reverse a limit order confirmation in SRM. The system will not allow it because a service entry sheet has been generated for the back end PO.
    As we have not activated the service part of SRM, our users do not have access to reverse the service entry sheet and so this function must be carried out by a BPO or CCC team member with full access.
    Does everyone end up with an S for a Limit Order item category type in their back end system?
    If you have this, what problems do you get.?
    Can anyone who has implemented the note 1355894 in an SRM 550 system let me know what the effect was?
    Thanks in advance
    Allen Brooks
    SRM BPO
    Sunderland City Council

    Muthu,
    Thanks for your reply.
    If I am understanding you correctly, this note only works where a supplier has No Confirmation Expected entered against the master record.
    The note is not very clear on this point and then the question remains, why do we need to use S for one entry and B for another?
    As we always expect confirmations for all our PO's it would appear that the note may have no effect on our systems so rather than applying the note in advance we will wait until we get to the SP16 application in the year ????.
    Thanks for the info this question is now answered.
    Regards
    Allen Brooks
    SRM BPO
    Sunderland City Council

  • Confirmations for Limit Orders in ECS

    In extended classic scenario when creating a limit order, there is an error in process in the local PO related to the follow-on documents for goods receipt with the following error message:
    'Combination of GR/IR control not allowed for external services'
    It is only possible to create the order in the backend if the Invoice Only option is selected in the Limit Order, but then this means it is not possible to create a confirmation for Limit Orders!
    Has anyone else come across this problem in ECS for limit orders?  As far as I am aware the functionality should work with GR-based invoice verification.  In the backend PO it is possible to create the same order without any errors!

    Monica,
    My analysis till now is:
    1) It is true that limit oders are not going with "Confirmation & Invoice" flag. We need to raise OSS.
    (There is one additional problem with this is "The vendor master flags don't get transferred to PO" for this you will have to implement the OSS notes 956083.)
    Now after applying this notes you see the standard functionality:
    2) If we are creating PO with "Invoice Only" flag then there are follwoing options:
    a) If the "GR based invoice" flag in vendor master is checked then the POs goes into D item category and you can enter a service sheet for them.
    b) If the "GR based invoice" flag in vendor master is NOT checked then the POs goes into B item category and you can enter invoice just after PO.
    I made change in V_T163Y for B item category and checked the flag for GR but then too I am not able to enter GR for item category B.
    Please assign points for useful answer as applicable.

  • Setting of tolerance limit while Process Order confirmation

    Dear Experts,
    I want to set tolerance limit onto the components of Process Order while doing the Process Order confirmation, Please teach me what all the steps do i need to follow for doing that.
    Thanks!
    Regards
    Sumit Kalyan

    Tolarance limit what you are speaking about is for the components. In wS view what you are setting up is the for the product, not for component.
    As I am aware we cannot set any tolarance limit for the component as such.
    I am not sure what actually you want.
    example - component  A, as per the planned qty in production order is lets ussay 10, now when doing confirmation user can enter 10+ or - 1, if he neters moer than 11 or less than 9 system should not allow? is that you are trying to implinment?
    If so that mayn not be possible unless otherwise you impliment some user exit.
    In OPK4 what settings are there is for product and not for raw material/component

  • Process order confirmation below tolerance limit, devation to be trigger to QA person

    Hi Team,
    Scenario is related with process order :
    While order confirmation , if we need to confirm process order below tolerance need deviation to be trigger which is approved by QA , allow order confirmation .
    How we can map the above scenario, so that deviation to be trigger to QA person for approval and than order confirmation is done.
    This is related with pharma company.
    Or Should we can map above process in other way.
    Thanks
    Vinu

    Hi Vinod,
    Is this o process order or Production order, if production order I suggest you to use the trigger point functionality, if process order u will need to go for user exit and some coding.
    Regards,
    Amol Kale.

  • Releasing credit sales order confirmation

    Hi
    We are using credit limit check. If the customer has credit issues, the sales order will get retained and the confirmation is lock. The issue is that after the released of the sales order the confirmation is not being unlock and the sales order is not taken into account by the filter of the backorder process.
    Where should I verify that the sales order confirmation field is unlock at the moment of the credit release process?
    Thanks a lot.

    Two places you can check in the sales order, click on the document flow button on the top. Then click on status button, expand the header status. Here you can see the credit status. The other place is go to menu Goto -> Header ->status. Here you can see the credit status field carries relevant information.
    Regards,

  • Automatic creation of limit order

    Hi,
    We have a limit SC with an assigned source of supply (contract). But after approval this SC becomes a PR in ECC and not a PO directly. We are in classic scenario and all SC with source of supply should do that (including limit orders).
    What could be wrong?
    br
    Anders

    when Buyer creates a limit shopping cart after approval PO must be created since partner function registered as 19 .
    so kindly check any BADI implemented to change the above behavior .
    Note 1243836 - Manual entry of invalid contract allowed in contract limit
    Note 1417491 - Adding a contract is not allowed in limit Shopping Cart
    Is it works fine without contract ?
    sap rule
    In the extended classic scenario, contract limit fields were enabled for limit Sopping Cart.
    In the extended classic scenario, you cannot assign a contract to a limit item. In the classic scenario, you can, as long as the confirmation and invoice flag is checked (it is not possible if only the invoice flag is checked). However, this is possible in the local scenario,that is you can assign a contract to a limit item in the local case (not extended), if the invoice only flag is checked.

  • Limit order items to be sent back to sourcing on deletion

    Hi all,
    We are on SRM 7.1 Extended classic.
    Can anyone confirm if the limitatin on the LIMIT orders not being sent back to SOURCING even after the PO items are deleted is stilll valid in SRM 7.1.???
    Also we want to use LIMIT orders instead of service orders in SRM 7 as there are seevral issues when users try creating carts with the SERVICE HIERARCHY.To avoid the manual errors,we would like to use limit orders in SRM and then if required when the PO items are deletd in SRM the items should be sent back to sourcing.
    If the limitation for the LIMIT orders items still hold true for SRM 7,then is there a way or enhancement to enable the sending of limit orders back to sourcing once the items are deleted in the PO in SRM?
    I know the report responsible for snding items back to sourcing is BBP_GET_STATUS_2 and CLEAN_REQREQ_UP but is there a way we can handle the sendng of the PO items back to sourcing base don some custom logic for limit orders or for that matter any type of PO created in SRM?
    Pls advise.

    The note 1247922 is for EXTERNAL requirements/Purchase requsitions in ECC backend system and is not what I'm looking for.
    Neverthless,I will create an OSS message with SAP and check if tehre is any enhancmenet available for sending limit items back to sourcing on PO deletion.Will update the thread accordingly
    Thanks for the help.

  • Limit Order Shopping Cart issue

    Hi SRM Gurus,
    I have some issue regarding Limit Order SC.
    Currenty I am using SRM 4.0 and doing the Limit Order SC.
    The Limit Order SC has been created successfully in SRM and the PO is also getting populated in ECC.
    But the problem is like,
    When we create Limit Order(blanket) Shopping cart, then there has 2 options to do that.
    (Under Follow-Up Action)
    1. Confirmation and invoice
    2. Invoice Only.
    Depending on the above in ECC, the Item category for the PO will be D(Confirmation and Invoice only)and B (Invoice Only).
    But for my case it's always showing Item Category D in both of the cases.So as because of this issue, some thing is going wrong from ECC perspective.
    So please help me out from this problem.
    Thnaks for your help in advance.
    Full points for the answer.
    Thanks again,
    Shraman

    Hi Shraman,
    We would like to start using limit shopping cart, but do not know how to implement this.
    Can you enlighten me in regards to this?
    Can you do it without using extended classic scenario?
    I have the option in the shop on behalf but not in normal shopping
    Thanks in advance,
    Thomas

  • Limit Order Shopping Cart Invoice posting issue

    Hello Experts,
    I am not able to post invoice for LIMIT ORDER SC(I am using Extended classic scenario); using MIRO when i enter PO no. in the specified field ; in the line item both the amount & quantity appears as zero. and it does not allow to change or edit. Ideally it should allow the posting of invoice but with block payment.
    The same thing i tried for "Describe requirement SC" and it allowed me for posting invoice even without GR/Confirmation.

    Hi,
    You can enter the Invoice, remove the GR/IR based invoice indicator from the invoice tab of the PO line item.
    thanks
    Padhi

  • Problem with Unknown account assignment with limit order...reply soon...

    Hello All,
    i am facing problem in <b>confirming the limit order with unknown account</b> <b>assinment</b>.We are using Extended classic scenario with SRM version 5.00 and ECC 6.00. When creating shopping cart with unknown account assignments,  shopping carts is getting created fine but when processing goods receipt the system only prompts for distribution by cost center and we do not have the option to selected processing against other account assignment e.g. internal order or network. the Cost center is coming as gray.What i am expecting that as in known account assignment it asks for a drop down and user can select cost center or order the same should happened with unknown account assignment. we have not implemented any badi for the same.
    please help me out. <b><u>Is this a standard behavior of shop with limit order for unknown account assignment where it prompts for cost center only or do i need to implement any badi.</u></b>

    Hi
    <b>Related links/ SAP OSS Notes to check out -></b>
    Note 861889 - Limitations on limit and service PO's in case of ECS
    Note 1046593 - Limit PO - Unable to delete and create new item
    Note 966323 - Service Item: Not able to create PO in ERP backend
    Note 969077 - LIMIT:SC with Account Assignment Unknown and IR_IND checked
    Note 1000184 - Account assignment error when document transfer to back end
    Note 1052892 - Account Assignment not visible for Limit Shopping Cart
    Note 933618 - Multiple account assignments for limit item are lost
    Re: Limit PO(Item category D instead of B)
    SE 518 No account assignment exists for service li ne 0000000000
    Creating SC with Dummy Account Assignment
    Re: Account assignment on SRM
    Re: Problem on account assignment
    Re: Account details not coming while creating a Shopping Cart with Limit Item
    LIMIT SC
    <u>Other related details -></u>
    Use Screen variants (Transaction - SHD0) to change item overview and search result screens.
    BADI - There is one BADI to hide/show some SC item creation links, there is one BADI to control screen details of PO, CTR... but not SC (and not external screens).
    So, as usual, identify the template and change the HTML code in SE80.
    To implement a more complex logic, like the default check box, change the ABAP code (usually in the PBO), if required.
    Do let me know.
    Regards
    - Atul

Maybe you are looking for