Mapping Ontime delivery requirement in sap vendor evaluation

Hi,
Have below requirement for calculating score for ontime delivery performance.
1. Evaluation will be executed weekly once
2. For the given weekf if18 are on time out of 20 total, then the vendor gets a 90% on time score
Tried mapping this
1. By making std.delivery date variance as 0
2. Maintaining points as below
0          100
99.9      1
but the above settings are not working. With the above settings, system is not even calculating the on-time delivery performance.
with this I realized that maintaining  std.delivery date variance(at least 1) is mandatory for SAP.
Can I one guide me how to map above requirement.
Thanks in advance
Hari

Hi,
I have logged similar request before and never got a satisfactory solution. My recommendation is to check the attached link, it details how the scores are calculated with reference to the config you have created. Just rolled out vendor evaluation in my organisation and this document was very useful.
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
Thanks.

Similar Messages

  • Vendor evaluation - main criterion : Delivery ; Sub criterion : On time del

    hi
    We have following requirement related to Vendor evaluation - main criterion : Delivery ; Sub criterion : On time delivery
    The requirement is:
    Deliveries late by 7 days should be considered as on time.
    pl suggest

    Hi Chintu,
    Thanks for ur reply.
    scores i have configured for qty.variance as,
    2     Qty. reliability                      100
    2     Qty. reliability     5.0-              90
    2     Qty. reliability     10.0-      80
    2     Qty. reliability     20.0-      75
    2     Qty. reliability     40.0-      50
    2     Qty. reliability     50.0-      40
    2     Qty. reliability     75.0-      20
    2     Qty. reliability     80.0-        1
    My dought is, For on on-time delivery we are not maintaining any smoothing factor right?
    So, Which smoothing factor we should consider for on-time delivery?
    I have maintained smoothing factor for
    Timeliness service -  .20
    Quantity Reliability - .30
    Shipping Instructions - .25.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Edited by: SAPr3.HELP on Nov 19, 2009 4:43 AM
    Edited by: SAPr3.HELP on Nov 19, 2009 8:25 AM
    Edited by: SAPr3.HELP on Dec 1, 2009 6:30 AM

  • Vendor Evaluation on time delivery criteria based on Month

    Dear Gurus,
    I have requirement that , in vendor evaluation the score calculation based on sub criteria on time delivery should not be on date basis , but need on period basis.
    Ex. I am giving PO to Vendor and delivery date criteria is on month basis means whole month he can provide me material based on his capacity. date is not fixed.
    can system score on the basis of period or it will be always on date basis, please guide me.
    Thanks & Regards
    Akshay

    I don't think that you can have an individual scoring method for one vendor, so a change of customizing will affect all vendors.
    A delivery date of an entire month would mean the last date of the month is the date in date field.
    So you would need to setup your percentages so that 30 days early delivery are still get  a 100 %

  • Vendor Evaluation through ME63

    Hi all,
    Kindly give me the configuration steps for Vendor Evaluation.  The specific requirement is
    only for two main criteria  1. Quantity - subcriteria  GR/IR inspection & Rejection/Complaint
    2. Delivery - subcriteria Ontime Delivery & Quantity Reliability.
    During evaluation,  the score of the vendor should be calculated as 50% of Quality Score + 50 % of Delivery score.
    Warm Regards,
    Sadashivan

    Hi,
    Check below links...
    Vendor Evaluation Configuration and steps?
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/EN/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
    http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm
    Edited by: Julfikar Ali on Apr 13, 2009 1:30 PM

  • Vendor Evaluation

    Business Requires that for Vendor Evaluation, the scores to be at  material level  for the same vendor which means if they put the vendor number in the report parameter , the system will give them the vendor performance   at  material level .
    Example :
    Materials  A and B were  purchased 10 times from vendor 100001 so the system will give:
    The  on time delivery for Material A as 100 %  ( if he did good performance )
    The on time delivery for material B as 50% ( if he did bad performance  ) ,they  donu2019t want the system to give the on time delivery for both the material as 75% (100+50 )
    The benefit of this is that SRS can find out another resources for the material with bad performance .
    Any Thoughts on that?

    Hi Tafanzas,
    The Vendor Evaluation system actually collects data on material level and then accumulates it for display in e.g. trs ME65. The data are collected in LIS and you can run the analyses from there using trs ME6H.
    BR
    Raf

  • Vendor Evaluation Purchasing Group wise

    Dear Friends,
    My clients Requirement  is to evaluate vendors based on Product group wise.
    I can use dedicated Buyers(purchasing group) for particular product group.
    What is the possibility of evaluating vendors Purch. group wise in SAP.
    Best Regards
    Krishna

    Hi ,
    In Standard SAP , Vendor Evaluation is done at the purchase organisation level.All the data required for vendor evaluation is stored in the system acordingly.
    In case you want to do vendor evaluation at purchase group level , you can acheive by custom developed program only.
    In case , the same vendor is used by more than one purchase group ... There is no system check to control this . But the vendor master is maintained at the purchase organisation level  that is why standard SAP is performing Vendor evaulation at the purchase organisation level..
    Regards
    Mani

  • Vendor evalution report in SAP BUSINESS ONE

    We require Vendor Evalution report in SAP BUSINESS ONE which has information about receipt(GRPO) perfomance against purchase order issued.  We require item code, item description, p.o.no., p.o.qty, delivery date, GRPO NO., GRPO Date, GRPO QTY, Delay no. of days. If there is any report in SAP please inform us. Otherwise any query we can make please inform us how to make query in SAP business one.

    Hi,
    The query from the thread is modified as below to include the customer/vendor name :
    SELECT T3.cardcode, T0.ItemCode, SUM(T0.Quantity) 'PO Qty',SUM(T1.Quantity) 'GRPO Qty', SUM(T2.Quantity) 'Return Qty'
    FROM dbo.POR1 T0
    LEFT JOIN dbo.PDN1 T1
    ON T0.DocEntry = T1.BaseEntry AND T0.LineNum = T1.BaseLine
    LEFT JOIN dbo.RPD1 T2
    ON T1.DocEntry = T2.BaseEntry AND T1.LineNum = T2.BaseLine
    INNER JOIN dbo.OPDN T3
    ON T1.DocEntry = T3.docentry
    WHERE T0.ItemCode is not NULL AND T0.DocDate >= [%0] AND T0.DocDate <= [%1]
    GROUP BY T3.cardcode, T0.ItemCode
    Check if this helps.
    Please make sure you have a look on the Query Generator and the related books on the SQL query writing before you start creating your own.
    Kind Regards,
    Jitin
    SAP Business One Forum Team

  • Vendor evaluation delivery subcriteria's calculation verification - reg

    Dear Experts,
    In display vendor evaluation & Standard analysis we get to know the quantity reliability, on time delivery criterias individual scores but can anyone plz guide the tcode to verify the score calculation for delivery and quality criterias. Ontime delivery and quantity reliabiltiy verification mc$6, mc$8 respective tcodes values not satisfactory to us for analysis.
    (We have analyzed the Price criteria - "price level" factors by comparing info record/PO price history and effective price of vendors).
    Simillarly plz guide how to confirm scores that are getting calculated is correct or not for
    delivery criterias - quantity reliabililty, on time delivery.
    Plz solve this issue.
    full rewards assured.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Viju.

    Hi,
    I have logged similar request before and never got a satisfactory solution. My recommendation is to check the attached link, it details how the scores are calculated with reference to the config you have created. Just rolled out vendor evaluation in my organisation and this document was very useful.
    [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
    Thanks.

  • Report on Vendor Ontime Delivery

    Hi
    Is there any Standard SAP report available on Vendor Ontime delivery, which is report showing deviation of PO delivery Date and GR date
    we need this report to monitor vendors
    Thanks

    there is no such report on PO level. you have to develope it yourself.
    SAP only captures and evaluates this only on aggrgated levels per month.

  • Vendor Evaluation in SAP

    Hi SAP Experts,
    We want to implement the vendor evaluation system for all material and service vendors in SAP. We have evaluated the standard functionality in SAP and most of the requirements are met if we use the standard system. But we are facing few major problems.
    Firstly it is regarding the evaluation level. The purchasing team wants to do the evaluation for each purchase order raised for the vendor. As per my understanding, we can do the vendor evaluation at the most at the purchasing info record level. This might not be sufficient for us.
    Secondly, we have a lot of cases of Service POs where we dont have info records since materials are not involved. I am not sure if the standard system would work in evaluating such cases at each PO level.
    Appreciate your comments and suggestions.
    Thanx & Regards,
    Sateesh

    Hi,
    Evaluating the vendor at PO level meaning we want to evaluate the performance of the vendor for each PO / Service PO. We want a provision to enter the ratings for each criterion for each PO. e.g. Quality of material for PO 45_01 and PO 45_02 would be evaluated seperately. Then we would like to consolidate the data at the vendor level.
    Hope this clarifies the doubt.
    Regards,
    Sateesh

  • Vendor Evaluation - Statistical Delivery Date

    Hi,
    The statistical delivery date is an important field during the calculation of the on-time delivery score. (see note 310666)
    After implementing a new support package this field wasn't filled up automatically anymore. Fortunately note 1039344 and 1164767 helped overcome this.
    But ... in the meantime purchase orders were created and received without a statistical delivery date.
    Which date / or what does sap do when calculating on-time delivery score if there is no statistical delivery date ? Does it take the "delivery date" into account ?
    with regards

    Use this link http://help.sap.com/search/highlightContent.jsp
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/EN/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
    Or find on the SAP help Vendor evaluation white Paper its there.
    Edited by: Prashant Prasad on Jul 31, 2009 12:01 PM

  • Reg: Vendor Evaluation - Criteria "Delivery"

    Hi Gurus,
    I am in process of vendor evaluation in system. Confguration is maintained and I am opting for Automatic vendor evaluation and our interest is in Price and delivery. When I am doing Vendor evaluation in ME61,
    I am getting the automatic values for Criteria "Delivery" and subcriteria  "Price Level" "Price Behavior".
    But incase of delivery I am not getting any values. I checked for settings in confirguration but not able to trace why the delivery vendor evaluation is not happening.
    Pls advice on this.
    Regards,
    Venu

    Hi
    There are some settings like minimum delivery percentage which needs to be fulfilled for calculating score with respect to delivery performance.
    Check the PDF from the link, it gives you more details on how score is been calculated for each criteria and customizing settings
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
    Regards
    Raja

  • Delivery rating in vendor evaluation

    Can I know on what logic system calculates the delivery rating, for schedule agreement which has more than one schedule lines.
    Regards,
    M.M

    Dear Magesh,
    This is for On time delivery:
    ===========================================================
    At the time of a goods receipt against a purchase order, the system checks whether the delivery was on time or late:
    GR date - delivery date = date variance
    If the delivery was on time, the system checks whether a minimum delivery quantity is to be taken into account.
    It checks the Minimum delivery quantity/standardizing value for delivery time variance from material indicator.
    – If the indicator has been selected, it checks whether a value has been maintained in the material master record.
    If a value exists, it is used. If no value exists, the value from the Minimum delivery percentage field is used. If there no such value in this case either, goods receipts of fractions of the order quantity are included in the calculation of the score.
    – If the indicator has not been selected, the value from the Minimum delivery percentage field is used. If no value exists, goods receipts of fractions of the order quantity are included in the calculation of the score.
    If the minimum delivery quantity is not reached, the system does not determine a score for the goods receipt.
    If the minimum delivery quantity is reached and the delivery date adhered to, the variance is zero and the system awards the highest points score for the relevant goods receipt.
    If the delivery is not on time, the system calculates the date variance in days and converts it into a percentage variance.
    In the process, the system searches for the standardizing value as follows:
    It checks the Minimum delivery quantity/standardizing value for delivery time variance from material indicator.
    – If the indicator has been selected, it checks whether a value has been maintained in the material master record.
    If a value exists, it is used. If not, the value from the Standardizing value for delivery time variance field is used. If there is no such value in this case either, one of the following values is used:
    – in the case of goods receipts against scheduling agreement releases: the firm zone
    – in the case of goods receipts against purchase orders: the difference between the statistical delivery date and the order date
    – If the indicator has not been selected, the value from the Standardizing value for delivery time variance field is used. If there is no such value, one of the following values is used
    – in the case of goods receipts against scheduling agreement releases: the firm zone
    – in the case of goods receipts against purchase orders: the difference between the statistical delivery date and the order date
    The system then awards the score you defined in Customizing for this percentage variance.
    The new score is then included in the vendor's previous score for the subcriterion. To calculate the new score for the subcriterion from the already existing composite score and this new individual score, the system applies the smoothing factor Date variance defined in Customizing.
    When you run a new evaluation, the system calculates the average of the individual scores for all materials. The result is the vendor's score for "On-Time Delivery Performance".
    If a goods receipt covers several schedule lines, MM Vendor Evaluation performs this calculation for each schedule line.
    This results in more than one score for the single goods receipt. Each of these scores is multiplied by the quantity delivered against the relevant schedule line and is thus weighted by quantity.
    The sum of the weighted points scores is divided by the total goods receipt quantity. The result is the score for this one goods receipt.
    The score for the goods receipt is smoothed and included in the existing score for on-time delivery performance for the vendor
    Adherence to Conf. Date :
    ===========================================================
    1. When a goods receipt is posted for an order item, the system checks whether open inbound deliveries exist for the order item, i.e. inbound deliveries for which no goods receipts have yet been recorded.
    If open inbound deliveries exist, the system checks whether the date previously notified by the vendor has been adhered to or whether the goods receipt date differs from the date thus confirmed:
    GR date - date confirmed by vendor in shipping notification = date variance
    2. If the delivery was on time, the system checks whether a minimum delivery quantity has been defined in Customizing.
    a. If you have not set a minimum delivery quantity, goods receipts representing partial deliveries will also be included in the calculation of the score.
    b. If the minimum delivery quantity is not reached, the system does not determine a score for the goods receipt.
    c. If the minimum delivery quantity is reached and the delivery is on time, the variance is zero. This means that the system awards the maximum score for the goods receipt.
    3. If the delivery date is not in accordance with the notified one, the system calculates the date variance in days and converts it into a percentage variance.
    4. The system then awards the score you defined in Customizing for this percentage variance.
    5. The new score is then merged with the vendor's previous score for the subcriterion. To calculate the new score for the subcriterion from the already existing composite score and this new individual score, the system applies the smoothing factor On-time delivery performance/Timeliness of service provision (defined in Customizing for Vendor Evaluation under Purchasing organization data for Vendor Evaluation).
    6. When you run a new evaluation, the system calculates the average of the individual scores for all materials. The result is the vendor’s score for adherence to the confirmation date.
    If a goods receipt covers several schedule lines, MM Vendor Evaluation performs this calculation for each schedule line.
    This results in more than one score for the single goods receipt. Each of these scores is multiplied by the quantity delivered against the relevant schedule line and is thus weighted by quantity.
    The sum of the weighted points scores is divided by the total goods receipt quantity. The result is the score for this one goods receipt.
    The score for the goods receipt is smoothed and merged with the existing score for adherence to the confirmation date for the vendor.
    Regards,
    w1n

  • Vendor evaluation on JIT delivery

    In case of JIT scenario how vendor rating on delivery, as schedule lines are dynamically changed in past and future.
    Does this mean that for a JIT scenario vendor is suppose to be delivering on time? And rating could be affected. Is there sufficient justification for this functionality not being available? Most of the automotive industry works on daily JIT schedules.  Clients say that it is important for the on-time and quantity reliability of vendors to be evaluated based on Goods receipt against JIT call. How vendor evaluation can be performed based goods receipt using JIT call.
    Rgs

    Hi Pankaj,
    I found a table called T147K ..
    I am passing xyz Purch Org. and Scoring Method is 3 (on-time delivery)..
    Here I found that
    Percentage Score Percenta
    000        100   100.0
    010        90    101.0
    020        95    102.0
    100        80    110.0
    200        60    120.0
    300        40    130.0
    400        20    140.0
    500         5    150.0
    999         1    199.9
    050        95    95.0
    100        65    90.0
    200        75    80.0
    300        60    70.0
    400        40    60.0
    500        20    50.0
    600         5    40.0
    999         0     0.1
    which one we need to consider when .. I am doing the calcuation to get percentage for vendor...
    Vendor Percentage =
    ( actual Del date - statistical del date) / Std del time var * 100.
    Raghunath.S
    Edited by: Raghunath Shyamala on Aug 29, 2008 1:07 PM

  • Vendor Evaluation Standardizing Delivery Date Variance

    Hi,
    We are determining what the settings should be for On-Time Delivery and Quantity Reliability under Vendor Evaluation.  I understand how the formual works when it determines the scores for these.  Can someone tell me from a business process perspective what Standardizing Delivery Date Variance relates to? 
    Ours has been set to 100 which is 100 days with the scores set as:
    Percentage
    Score
    0
    100
    10
    90
    20
    95
    100
    80
    200
    60
    300
    40.......
    When we pick 100 days, is that supposed to be an average of how many days late goods receipts are?  Or is there another way to look at it? 
    Thanks
    Beverly

    Have you really read the documentation and the F1 field help, or any of our blogs, documents and wikis here in SCN?
    The table that you presented above is far a way from reality. a percentage can go from blank  to 99.9  and your from -99.9 to blank
    this is to cover both situations early deliveries and late deliveries
    the Standard Delivery Date Variance means the it is the maximum number of days a vendor can be late or early to the wanted delivery date, if this value is reached, then he just missed the point in the sense of the word. he does not get any single point for his performance.
    You have to ask your business how much days variance they accept before they cancel the order, or at least looking for a new vendor with the next order.
    From our point of view everything beyond a week is not at all acceptable and results in a total miss
    and in this case you do not need many percentages either in a 5 working day week  each day corresponds to 20%

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to catch exception into a String variable ?

    I have a code catch(Exception e)             e.printStackTrace();             logger.error("\n Exception in method Process"+e.getMessage());         }when i open log i find Exception in method Process null. But i get a long error message in the serve

  • Adobe Audition CC has stopped working

    Audition crashes after 1 second. I get the splash screen, and then a windows message: "The program has stopped working". I uninstalled /reinstalled but same result. I run a fresh copy of windows 8.1 X64.The splash screen says "Initializing required a

  • Change Requisition Qty or Price in iProcurement

    create a requisition in iprocurement. approve it by approver. our system creates an approved po for this requisition. now change the requisition by changing its price in iprocurement. press next on iprocurement screen - we are on to change order sele

  • IPhone in Europe/roaming/wifi

    So as mentioned in an earlier post, I will be in Europe as of the end of this month for a three month + visit. If I actually needed an excuse to do so one of the main reasons for buying an iPhone was to use it over there, ( UK and France ), during th

  • Javascrip for height adjustment in iframe

    I have an iframe that needs it's height to adjust with the content.  Can anyone help?  here's the link to the page: http://www.hermancg.com/html/HermanCG-Plan-Room.html This is the iframe code within a div for that same page:     <!-- InstanceBeginEd