Org structure issue

Hi,
I have a question related to an org structure issue. Let me explain by taking an example:
The Org set up we have goes like this, let A1 be the VP of a particular division, he has a director B1 reporting to him. B1 has four different employees C1, C2, C3 and C4 reporting to her. The interesting part here is, C1 and C2 belong to a different cost center (say CC1) and C3, C4 belong to a different one (CC2). Both CC1 and CC2 are managed by B1. The tricky part is CC1 comes under the VP 'A1' while CC2 does not have any supervisior above. B1 is the final supervisor.
The problem is, when I run the Org report to find all the employees coming under A1, C3 and C4 also show up. How to correct this?
In our system, the org structure is driven by position of the employee and not by the cost center. However we have an relationship record (A011) in HRP1001 between the Org unit of the employee and the cost center but it does not serve the purpose because B1 is placed in one cost center CC1 and manages the other cost center CC2 too. Since she can be in one cost center at a time say CC1 there is no record pertaining to CC2 for her.
How to resolve this? what kind of config change needs to done?
Any leads or suggestion would be helpful.
Thanks in advance,
SG

Hi,
You can define your organization structure except the cases you have exceptional .
For the exceptional Objects create them in Expert mode and maintain infotype 1001 depending upon the requirement.
Warm Regards,
Kapil Kaushal

Similar Messages

PR to PO conversion - Issue from Org structure

Dear all
I have configured following Org Structure in 4.6C.
Plant: z101 is assigned with company code:xxxx
another
Plant: z201 is assigned with Company code:yyyy
and centralised purchase organisation is used.
I have created a PR belongs to plant:z101.So its based on company code:xxxx
when I referring that PR to create PO and but entering the plant as z201........ system is allowing me to create.
when I display the PO,its shows the plant as z101 for that line item but company code is become yyyy.............
I really wondering .........how the system is allowing.....
any suggestions?

i think you have created your companyes by copying the data from company code 1000. so first conferm that you have assigned them same charts of account like INT.
now, Goto
IMG --> Materials Management --> purchasing --> valuation and Account determination --> Account determination --> Group together valuation area
Here you have to group (cluster your different plants) with the same key like 001.
Now make a po.
if not works tell me

Display of Person with position in Org Structure

Dear All,
We have a display issue, please help us to resolve.
While uploading the master data with help of BDC, the data is uploaded which has been checked properly showing data has been uploaded. But when we see the org structure through ppom_old we cant see person assignment to the positions.
chandan maity

Hi,
Whenever you run master data upload through BDC the relationships in OM are not created.
I am sure you have created the necessary positions in OM under Org Units and then used these positions in BDC to upload your IT 0001. But now you are not able to see the position - holder assignment in OM, right?
If this is your problem then go to SE38 and run program RHINTE00.
Select one or two persons for whom you have uploaded master data and run the above program for them
If you have already created OM objects then tick mark CREATE HOLDER RELATIONSHIPS ONLY
a session will be created with your username which you can process through SM35
please go through the documentation of the report to understand the use.
cheers
Ajay

Org Structure not updating in CRM Correctly

Hi Experts,
We have an issue with their ALE transfer of the HR Org Structure (from the HR box) to the structure in the CRM box.
It is (apparently) randomly not updating certain details. Org units and their relationships which are changed in ECC are not getting replicated into CRM. The relations with the parent node are not flowing to CRM in most of the cases.
e.g. a position change won't come or new org assignment.
Every time we are pulling using PFAL for missing relations and new assignments but client is not happy with the persistent issue.
Can anyone give me any assistance on what else I should be looking at to troubleshoot random missing data in the ALE process?
Many thanks in advance.
Vijay

Hi Maggi,
We are using HRMD_ABA. .. is that what u r asking..?
Please let me know if you need more details.
Thank you..
Vijay

Asset exclusion is selected though it is excluded in the org. structure.

Hi SRM gurus,
We are working on a Standalone scenario (SRM 4.0) where we have assets and asset classes.
In our org. structure we have excluded two asset classes with the exclusion indicator to the corresponding attributes of the purchasing organisation.( Asset class - ANK). But when we create a SC all the assets are selected in the Item details --> Cost assignment ---> dragdown (asset).
From our case it seems there is no effect of the exclusion indicator/ we made something wrong somewhere.
Can we get few suggestions/sap notes from the group that what went wrong?
Thnx. & Reg.,
Sridhar.

Hi Mani,
Thanks a lot for your reply.
If the exclusion indicator is maintained at user level also it is not working.( all
assets are selected from the list and there is no difference between the others)
May I get any further suggestions on this issue pls.
Thx. & reg.,
Sridhar.

Org Structure - "No attribute found for scenario BBP"

SRM 7.0 Extended Classic Scenario
Hi, On the check tab for the Central Person (SRM 7.0 shows CP instead of BP in org structure) I have the message "No attribute found for scenario BBP". This is SAP message number 5AT103
Transaction BBP_BP_OM_INTEGRATE is not showing or clearing the issue.
I have this issue with one user that I created manually, I dragged him around a lot. Other users I created manually within the same organizational unit are fine.
Also, we replicated part of the R3 4.7 HR Org Structure into SRM and I dragged it into my manually created SRM org structure. All users (error on CP tab, as I mentioned) replicated over, have this error.
I took a manually created user that was OK and dragged him into the replicated part of the org structure and he is still OK.
Please help.
Thanks,
Matt

Hi Matt,
We are facing similar issues. Please let me know how u resolved this issue ?
Rgds
Siva

Org Structure selection disappear

Hi,
Just wondering, did anyone came across this problem...
I am creating a report using a HR Report Category which allows me to do selection by Org Structure. The Org Structure selection is thru' a button that appears together with Futher Selection of HR Report Category.
1. Upon selecting a Org Unit via Org Structure I clicked the tick to accept my selection.
2. The Org Structure button has a Green shade on it.
3. I reenter Org Structure again by clicking the Org Structure button again.
4. This time instead of clicking the tick to accept selection, I click the cross on the right top side of the window to close the window without making any changes to my selection in Org Structure.
5. It turn out all selection has been removed from Org Structure (Green shade disappear)
Hope anyone who has come across this issue can provide me with a solution to have the selection retain despite me clicking on the cross at the top right of the org structure window.
Thanks in advance.
Lawrence

It is Std functionality.. when you close the popup window it amounts to 'cancelling the selection & the 'ticks' are clared.. I don't think you have an easy workaround here.. PL take a look at the code insde the function module RP_PNP_ORGSTRUCTURE & you will understand the situation better. thios is where the selection is cleared out..
IF SY-SUBRC = 2.                              "L9BK018353
   CLEAR POBJID[].                             "L9BK018353
   EXIT.                                       "L9BK018353
ELSEIF SY-SUBRC <> 0.                         "L9BK018353
   MESSAGE ID 'PN' TYPE 'E' NUMBER 016 WITH TEXT-101.
   EXIT.
~Suresh

HR Org Structures and MSS

Hello Everyone,
We've been testing various scenarios in our QA system regarding the 'relationships' between teams and supervisors with and without the chief's top hat in the org structure. Then, we were left with some questions.
How does MSS work? How can a senior manager in another organisational unit see the records of a manager from another unit?
Eg:- "X" is not a manager in his Org unit, is a supervisor of 8 employees who are all Manager's within their own org unit. Then, when we assigned the chief's top hat to "X" he can only see the employees without top hat's in the same org unit of "X".
So, do we need to amend to include supervisors of managers? i.e. not supervisors of employees just supervisors of managers!
How easy is it to do that? Without this senior managers will have less functionality than individual team managers.
Please let me know if you require any clarification.
Please help me in resolving this issue. I would appreciate your help.
Thanks a lot.
Regards,
PG.

Below is the way to test:
1. Create two Org Units - A and B
2. Create employees in Org Unit A and Manager in Org Unit B
3. Make the Manager chief of Org Unit B
4. Create reporting relationship between the employee and the Manager
5. Also create relationship between the employees and the Org Unit
6. Maintain User IDs of all the employees and the Manager in IT0105 in PA30
Above steps are at ECC end
Portal steps:
1. Assign MSS role to Manager's User ID
2. Assign ESS role to employees' User ID
Assignment of roles will be done Portal Consultant.
Then login to portal as Manager and check the team Calendar whether you are able to view the employees
Regards,
Suhasini

Short Dump while copying Org structure from ERP to CRM

Hello Experts:
We are trying to copy the Org structure from ECC to CRM.
We have a standard transaction 'CRMC_R3_ORG_GENERATE' to copy the the org structure from ECC or the IMG path:
SPRO->CRM->Master Data->Organization Management->Data Transfer->Coppy ECC Sales Structure
We have a multiple assignment scenario where each sales groups are assigned to multiple sales offices and likewise,each sales office is assigned to multiple sales org unit in ECC.
This can be achieved by turning on the enhanced version.
In our current business,even though the sales offices and groups are created,but are not having relavance in the business,hence while running in the sandbox system, we ran the program to copy the structures in the standard mode(default) and we could copy it without issues and create the org units for every entity in CRM based on how the number ranges are defined.
What happens when enhanced version switch is turned on ::
While we turn the mode to enhanced version, The system automatically::
- enhances the Function tab page in the ppoma_crm transaction to include a grid table, in which you maintain multiple assignments of organizational units
- generates an extra dialog box to the Organization tab page in business transactions for you to select the relevant assignment path for the organizational unit
- adapts the consistency check in business transactions to take into account organizational units that have been multiple assigned
Risk factor :
Once you have switched to the enhanced backend integration version of the organizational model you cannot return to the standard backend integration version. The system will also automatically make changes to the organizational model version in CRM Mobile Sales.
Also this structure will happen across all the clients in the system,so unfortunately cannot try in a sandbox client also of the new environment.
We are building our development box,so while running the above step in standard mode,the program gives a short dump due to long execution time even though we have the same amount of data as in our prototype system.
Also, we increased the idle time value to a very high value.
When I approached SAP OSS,I was told that it is due to the multiple assignment scenario,hence we need to switch to enhanced version in CRM before we run the copy program ( CRMC_ORG_R3_GENERATE )
I am not quite sure if the mismatch of the scenarios between CRM and ECC could be causing this short dump as we could run it in standard mode in our prototype/sandbox environment without issues even with the same data volume as in the new development system .
I am looking for help from all the experts if they have come across similar issue and your recommendations/feedback if this can be corrected.
Appreciate your guidance/recommendation on this issue.
thanks!!

In CRM Best Practices Building block C05 is the step by step description how to replicate Org. structure and some of employee's master data.
Follow link - http://help.sap.com/bp_crmv12007/CRM_DE/BBLibrary/html/C05_EN_DE.htm

SRM 7.0 Org structure incosistent

Dear All,
We are on SRM 7.0, We have replicated the Employee data from HR Org.
We are facing a strange issue, Sometimes the organizational units defined for company code / P.org and P.group
through the function tab is unassigned automatically.
We see the function tab data is removed in Company code / purchasing org and purchasing group.
This is causing lots of issues.
We had given personal settings role for few users to change company code as they work for shared service.
We are not sure whether it causes any impact.
Pls share your thoughts
Regards
harish

Satish
As we communicated in other thread
Re: SRM 7.0 Org structure report
Regards
Virender

Agent Determination with Org Structure without HR

We are currently on SAP 4.7 without the HR component. Our tech area would really like us to implement our first workflow where agent assignment is determined from an org plan. This workflow is a very simple workflow and actually only involves 2 people (one clerk and one manager).
If I build a very simple structure for this particular department, how easy is it to add on additional levels, both higher or lower, at a later date that will accomodate future workflows without effecting the existing one?
Thoughts?

Thank you Ramki and Sivarajendren,
I guess I'm still struggling with the best way to determine agent assignment given our circumstances (no HR) and the simplicity of this workflow. (Recap of workflow - investigation and approval of corp refunds done by person # 1. If refund > $500, needs approval from person #2).
The tech area wants me to create a simple org plan but not assign any users to it and then transport it all clients. Then in each client, we can assign users which would accomodate our testing with different id's than in prod. The workflow would then assign to a position not a userid. The advantage is that when people leave, the org plan must be maintained not the workflow.
I've thought about using responsibility rules but ultimately, you are assigning a userid to a rule which still needs maintenance if a user leaves.
I've also thought about using activity groups but the way we use them at our location isn't appropriate in this circumstance. Our activity groups are so broad it would give too many people access to workflows.
Lastly, I've thought about creating a custom Z table with the userid's in it and calling a function module to determine agent assignment. This actually sounds intriguing but again, someone would need to maintain the userid's in the table. Also, what's the best kind of key for the table - taskid?
One of our dilema's is that IT management does not want to give anyone authorization to change a WF templete in prod. So I must create the WF templete with the correct assignment in our dev system and then transport it to our prod system.
Then there's the whole issue about who will be doing any maintenance. Since we don't have an HR component at this time (hopefully sometime in the next 5 years), HR won't maintain an org structure.
See how complicated this is becoming? I'd appreciate any insight.
Joanne

Shows all Org Structure in Org Unit Listing in Nakisa Org Chart

Hi,
We are using Org Chart 3.0SP2.
The issue is when we search the Org Units in Org Unit listing it also shows other Org Units from other org structure which does not lie inside our selected Org Structure (already given the root org unit ID in Org chart config)
But i cannot restrict the org unit listing because we cannot find any option to give root org unit ID in org unit listing configuration.
How can we restrict this Org unit listing which should show only the org units below the selected org structure.
Because already several org structure exists in back-end,but we have given one org structure (entered the root id) which we need for org chart.
Thanks,
Sakthi.

Hi Sakthi,
The search uses a listing report that pulls all active OrgUnits from HRP1000. This will include objects not within your org structure. The only way to do this is to add a data filter to the search data element that filters out these objects (e.g. filter by a short code or name). Please note that you cannot filter by the key field (ID).
Best regards,
Luke

SRM Purchasing Org Structure

Hi,
I'm in ECC 6.0 with SRM Server 5.5 as an add-on. I need some help in the area of Organization Structure.
1. In SRM config (PPOMA_BBP)I defined a Org Node for Company code. Then assigned it to a company. Then I defined a Purch. Org and attached a Purchasing Org (MM) to it. Then I defined a Purchasing Group and attached it to a Purchasing Group (MM). All these 3 entitities are defined as Org Unit (type 'O'). Then I link HR Purchaser to SRM purchasing group by relation 'is purchaser of'.
Am I correct?
Business partner is automatically created for Purchasing Org but it did not get created for Company and Purchasing Group. Is it correct?
I could not see the shopping cart. So I did a debug and findout that SRM is trying to find a Business Partner (BP) for the Purchasing Dept (Org Structure in HR).
So can anybody throw some light into this Organization Structure stuff?
Thanks
Deb

Hi Guys,
In addition to my message above, I'm adding the error below so that somebody can better understand the issue here.
Information on where terminated
    Termination occurred in the ABAP program "CL_BBP_ES_EMPLOYEE_MYS========CP" -
     in "IF_BBP_ES_EMPLOYEE~GET_RL_UNIT_IDS".
    The main program was "SAPLBBP_SC_UI_ITS ".
    In the source code you have the termination point in line 45
    of the (Include) program "CL_BBP_ES_EMPLOYEE_MYS========CM008".
    The termination is caused because exception "CX_BBP_ES_INTERNAL_ERROR" occurred
     in
    procedure "USER_DETAIL_GET" "(FORM)", but it was neither handled locally nor
     declared
    in the RAISING clause of its signature.
    The procedure is in program "SAPLBBP_SC_APP "; its source code begins in line
    6 of the (Include program "LBBP_SC_APPF35 ".
=========================================================
return parent org.-units of all paths
SORT lt_struc BY seqnr.
LOOP AT lt_struc REFERENCE INTO lr_struc WHERE otype = 'O'.
    IF lv_level IS INITIAL.
      lv_level = lr_struc->level.
    ELSEIF lv_level <> lr_struc->level.
      EXIT.
    ENDIF.
    ls_rl_unit-otype = lr_struc->otype.
    ls_rl_unit-objid = lr_struc->objid.
    ls_object-otype = lr_struc->otype.
    ls_object-objid = lr_struc->objid.
    CALL FUNCTION 'HR_OBJECTBUPA_GETBUPA'
      EXPORTING
        is_object               = ls_object
      IMPORTING
        es_hrobjbupa            = ls_rl_bupa
      EXCEPTIONS
        object_type_not_allowed = 1
        OTHERS                  = 2.
    IF sy-subrc <> 0
    OR ls_rl_bupa-bupaguid IS INITIAL.
      RAISE EXCEPTION TYPE cx_bbp_es_internal_error.
    ENDIF.
    ls_rl_unit-guid = ls_rl_bupa-bupaguid.
    APPEND ls_rl_unit TO rt_reportingline_unit.
ENDLOOP.
ENDMETHOD.
Thanks
Debashish

Problems with HR org structure replication

Hello,
EBP 5.0, HR 4.7
we have a big issue where at the moment replication between HR and SRM is not working properly.
We made customizing according to 550055 note and found out that BAdI BBP_OM_BUPA_ALE (note 850328) is active. This prevents to have concurrent employment in SRM org structure.
We can replicate O (units) and S (positions) form HR without problem. But when we try to replicate P (persons) with infotype 0105 filled (users in SRM) afterwards we do not see positions for which users have to be created!!!
IDOCs have information that everything went OK.
Please help!
Gordan

Issue is resolved by SAP, some customizing entries are missed from ECC side

Alternate design for the ORS org structure

Hi Gurus,
Need your expert advise on below issue. We are currently on SRM 5.0 using classic scenario.
We are currently exploring the feasibility of either adopting the HR org structure for ORS or an alternative to the org chart that supports workflow routing and is not cumbersome to maintain.
Please advise if there is any other alternate design aside from adopting HR org unit to ORS. Can also advise if that design as an org chart will support workflow.
Many thanks for the help.
jho

Thanks for the help

Org structure issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for