Output Proposal not automatically proposed
Hi Experts,
I have created a condition record for output type Zquo .
When I do the output determination analysis and click on condition access i see a message < b condition found /b> and System Response says "An output proposal is created".
Even after this The output is not proposed automatically.
what could be the problem.
I appreciate all the help I can get with this .
Tks in advance
Hi,
Assign your Out put type to the billing Type in T.Code :VV31 and then create fresh billing doc.
Regards,
R.Janakiraman
Similar Messages
-
Output type not automatically determined (no output device specified)
the output device is already specified for this output
we dont want to manually add the output on all the invoices where the output was not automatically determined before... what should we do?
is there a way not to manually add them?
thanks in advance
PablitoHi
You really dont need to add the output in all these documents.
You have to maintain the masterdata for output records in VV31.
Now just open all the invoice documents one by one in Change mode through transaction code VF02 and just save it
Whenever a document is opened in change mode, the output gets automatically triggered. Hence the output type will be automatically populated in the output screen. Once you save the document, the output gets successfully executed, and you will get the desired document
Reward if this helps you -
Output Type not automatically determined at invoice creation
Hi Friends,
I am facing a problem that while i am generating the invoice for a particular billing document type, the output type is not automatically being determined. Instead, I have to go into the invoice in change mode (VF02) Header>Output and assign the output type to it and select the local printer and save in order to print the invoice.
I am generating the invoice for this Invoice Type/Output type for the first time.
Please suggest the possible causes.
Regards,
PankajHello Pankaj,
Suppose you are using output type RD00 for invoice print out. You have maintained the condition record for RD00 in transaction code VV31. The most important thing here is the assignment of the printer.
Suppose for output type RD00 you are maintaining the condition record for key combination - Sales Organization + Distribution Channel + Division.
At the header level you will see the Sales Organization & Distribution Channel & at the item level you will see the Division.
Sales Organization = BP01
Distribution Channel = 01
Division.............Name..........Funct.........Partner............Medium......Disp. Time.....Langu
01............... Std Division..........BP............--......................1......................3................---
Select the line item & click on Communication. Here assign the output type which you will use for the print out. Now Save the condition record.
After doing this try running one sales cycle - sales order - delivery - invoice. Save the invoice & now check in the change mode (transaction code VF02) the system will determine the output type RD00 automatically.
Note:
1. In the create mode the system will not display the output type RD00, after you have saved the invoice the output type will be determined automatically.
2. Also check if there is any requirement assigned for the key combination in the access sequence (IMG - Sales and Distribution - Basic Functions - Output Control - Output Determination - Output Determination Using the Condition Technique - Maintain Output Determination for Billing Documents - Maintain Access Sequences)
With best regards,
Allabaqsh.
(Idhasoft Ltd.) -
Output type not automatically triggered in billing
Dear all,
Output type is not automatically triggered while creating billing,every billing need to maintain it
manually but output type is already maintained for all customers in VV31.
How to solve this issue or any configuration setting need to be done ?
JeyakanthanHi
Kindly check the belwo path
Sales and Distribution
Basic Functions
Output Control
Maintain Output Determination for Billing Documents
Maintain Output Determination Procedure
in the billing out put procedure check against the billing out oput condition type any tick is maintained in the manual only
Regards
Damu -
Output device not automatically determined in VF02
Hello gurus,
My default output device is not coming automatically when I add an output type in VF02. This is an issue because output type has requirement 62 set in output procedure, therefore it will not be added until invoice is release to accounting. Futhermore, we have implemented Argentina eletronic invoice, which won't allow to change the invoice once it has been released to accounting. Quite a contradiction. So I'm hoping the output type will be added by condition technique while releasing to accounting, yet i believe since the output device is not being automatically determined in the background, it won't do.
Any ideas?
Thank you very much.
JPHello guys,
I had checked all your suggestions before posting this thread, but still the issue remains:
- VV31 condition records are fine but I cannot set a single output device since it will be used for many output devices.
- Analysis was carried in VF02 and the condition is being picked up but since requirement 62 is set in the output procedure, which forces the billing document to be first released to accounting, the condition is being removed:
- Printer is set in the user profile options, but does not come as default in VF02
Thank you all.
Kind regards,
JP -
Output type not automatically triggered on invoice creation
Hi,
I want to set three output types ZCUM, ZCUR and ZPCC upon invoice creation.
I have configured it correctly. For Output types ZCUM and ZCUR i have maintained condition record in key combination "Billing Type" and for ZPCC condition record is maintained in " Sales Org /Cust. Grp. 5/Ord. reason / Bill. Type" that's the difference.
In NACZ procedure is Z10000 with requirement is 902 for all three.
Output types ZCUM and ZCUR defaulting upon initial creation. But ZPCC is not defaulting.
Can you please suggest me the solution ...
Thank You,
ArchanaHi,
As suggested by Brad, check the Output Determination analysis in Billing document .
Menu option -> Go to -> Output
Select the output type -> Select menu option Go to -> Determin. Analysis
Expand the Output type determination details of ZPCC by expnading the node in analysis.
Check whether Green button is displayed against the access sequence mentioned by you.
Regards
Vinod -
Output type not proposed in Message Control when PO is created
Hi,
DETAILS
I have set up the system to send a IDOC when a PO is created. I have done the following settings in the system to send the IDOC using the message control functionality in the PO creation screen.
1). Created a new output type ZNEU which is an exact copy of NEU output type provided by the SAP system.
2). Assigned the new output type to the output determination procedure.
3). Enabled the new output type ZNEU for ALE distribution.
4). Maintained the condition records in the system for the output type ZNEU such that for the P org, endor and Docmuent type combination the output shall be proposed.
5). Maintained a partner profile( Logical System ) and assigned the output type ZNEU to this partner profile.
6). Created a Distribution model for Sender ~ Receiver for ORDERS message type.
PROBLEM
When i create a PO the new output type is not getting proposed by the system. I am not sure why it is not getting porposed in the message control.
I tried to manually enter the ZNEU output type in the system to see if the system is accepting. I am getting an error
Partner % does not exist for partner function LS
Any idea what i am missing? Am i missing any configuration or am i doing something wrong?
cheersThe output is not being proposed automatically is becuase you are missing "Condition Records" for the output type ZNEU.
Go to NACE.
Select EF - Purchase Order
Select "Condition Records"
Select ZNEU and select condition records
Now, system will bring the combinations of access sequence. Maintain appopriate record.
This will enable you to get the output type automatically in the purchase order.
Regards,
Naimesh Patel -
Output not getting proposed from a Purchase Order just for One vendor
Hi All,
We have an issue where in we have maintained a condition record with the access as "Purchase Doc type (NB) and Purchase Organization(XXXX):" pointing towards a "LS" partner function (ALE) and "4"
We have also maintained Partner configuration correctly. The issue which happens only in Production and not in TEst systems which is " only for ONE VENDOR the output is not getting proposed and for the other vendors it is getting proposed correctly. We also have a requirement attached to the Output and we do not have any vendor specific logic.
We also checked /Compared both the test and production system on Output Configuration as well as master data for VEndor and Info records and they seem to be ok.
Does any one faced a similar situation why an Output would not propose just for one specific vendor?
Would appreciate if any one can reply asap.
Thanks,Then check with the requirement you are using bd64 is distribution model.
Check with ur output type, requirement and output determination. ale service comes only in picture partner profile with outbound parameters.
have u done the correct entries under message control in outbound parameters.
thanks
Aman -
Email Output type : No Automatic trigger of output type while saving doc.
Hi Gurus - To trigger an email from the output type, I've configured a output type with medium as 5(external send) with communication strategy and created condition records with medium as 5 to trigger immediately.
While creating corresponding document, the output is not automatically determined, it required to manually feed the output type every time. Can you please provide if any settings were missed to trigger immediately!!
In Output analysis showing a message as "No print data determined for the communication strategy"
Steps:
1. Configured the output type with Medium as"5" and associated partner functions.
2. Created the condition records with medium as 5 and trigger immediately.
Thanks,
SreeHi ,
while maintaining condition record for output type when you click on communication method, give logical destination as 'LP01'.Hope this will solve.PLease let me know if you have any issues on this.
Thanks and regrads,
Rajeshwar -
System automatic propose the OK function and user cannot remove in migo_gr
Dear Friends,
Can anyone advice, in configuration of system automatic propose the OK function at the time of goods receipt with reference to PO number by migo_gr and using mvt type u2013 105 & User will not be authorized to remove the tick from ok function.
Thanks in advance.
Madhukar Mittal
SAP-MM ConsultantHi Antony/ other SAP friends,
Ok function is made default, basic administrator has done setting that anyuser cann't remove default tick of ok function but my requirement is that even user cann't change ok function i.e unticked ok function at item level also at the time of migo_gr.
This is due to BOM explode at the time of goods receipt and user take header material from subcontractor and if child component stock is not available, he removes the child consumption ok function tick and inward header material due to that stock MBLB report and ancillary stock reconciliation problem are facing.
Can anyone advice in this matter.
Thanks
Madhukar Mittal -
Shift planning - automatic proposal determination
Hi Experts
There are two shifts in our system, named A and B, and A' daily work schedule is from 8 AM to 5 PM and B's is from 8 PM to 5 AM. there is no overlap between these two shifts. Now two persons with the same job and qualification work for these two shifts. On a specific day, person 1 plans to work for shift A and person 2 plans to work for shift B in planned time working schedule(infotype 0007). Then I want to exchange thess two persons' shifts in PP61 using automatic proposal determination by returning different priority: for shift A, raise person 2's priority and for shift B, raise person 1's priority.
Now I encounter problem in finishing this: when determining shift A's candidate, person 2 can not be selected although he has the same job and qualification with person 1, and the reason is there is no overlap between shift A's working time and person 2's planned working time(0007) . How can I make person 2 selected even there is no overlap between the shift working time and planned working time?
could any expert help me out?
Thanks a lot!
shaomingHi Shaoming -
We are facing similar issue now in our implementation.
Can you please let us know in case your issue was resolved.
Thanks,
Sanjay -
hai gurus,
i have created a packing proposal at order level and when i am creating a delivery with respect to order the packing proposal not getting copied and i have activated the indicator automatic packing in delivery also.but still the proposal not getting copied.\
please provide the solution.
thanks inadvance,
baluDear Siddique Shaikh,
Packing Details will never be Copied to A/R Invoice as long as you have delivery. This applies to all versions.
Thanks,
Gordon -
Delegate not receiving "Proposed New Time" items
I am looking at a principal who has given delegate access to his admin and configured the delegate to receive all meeting related items. I've verified this in the principal's mailbox. The meeting invitations all are sent from the principal's calendar
and the delegate sees the requests and all acceptances/declinations; however, the delegate is NOT receiving "Proposed New Time" items. The principal does receive them, thus we know the option to "Allow New Time Proposals" is not
disabled.
The one oddity I saw was that the principal had given the delegate "owner" permissions to his calendar, which makes the permissions appear as "Custom" in his Outlook. However, in Office 365, GET-MAILBOXFOLDERPERMISSIONS <ALIAS>:\CALENDAR
shows that the delegate has Editor permissions. I reset the permissions in the principal's calendar to "Editor" to remove the "custom" setting (once upon a time, custom settings used to cause issues in Outlook). The change, however, had
no effect.
Any ideas?Hi Taj,
It’s by design. Decline and Propose New Time is same as decline meeting request. When you decline a meeting, this meeting will be automatically deleted in your calendar.
If you want to propose new time, you can try another option--- Tentative and Propose New Time. By default, you will tentatively accept the meeting.
More details about Propose, accept, or decline a new meeting time, for your reference:
https://support.office.microsoft.com/en-us/article/Propose-accept-or-decline-a-new-meeting-time-6e249871-0755-4171-8250-c5cbac240d33?CorrelationId=f66c9068-6d89-44f9-8286-2b44f9d17b46&ui=en-US&rs=en-US&ad=US
Best Regards,
Allen Wang -
Payment proposal not generated throgh f110
Hi FI Gurus,
My problem will understand with the following scenario:
I have one vendor having debit balance of 5000 and have many debit and credit trsanction including down payment of 6000.
I haven't clear down payment through F-54.
I executed f110, after payment proposal saving, I want to open to see payment proposal list but it was throwing message like " Company codes xxx/xxxx do not appear in proposal 21.12.2009 xxxx; correct".
Could you tell me reason why payment proposal not generated. Or this may be because of overall this vendor has debit balance.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
PrakashHi,
Some times this message comes if vendor or document (intend to clear) is locked under some other payment proposal.
I would suggest check previously created payment runs and find out where the proposal run is not complete successfully.
If you find any such entry then ask user either to complete this run or delete the proposal then parameters. Later create a fresh proposal & payment run.
Please let me know if it helps!!
Regards, -
Output type not trigerring Automatically for inbound delivery
Hi all
We have created a custom output type for Delivery idoc processing ZPOD copy of OPOD and maintained all the settings also condition record for the same has been maintained.
But when we are creating inbound delivery the output type ZPOD is not coming automatically.
In the Delivery document and in the Output screen i have checked Determine analysis for output(VL32N -> Enter IBD No -> Select menu option Extras -> Delivery output -> Header
Go to menu option GoTo -> Determin.Analysis.)
It is showing me ->Message 502-Output ignored (requirement 017 not fulfilled)
Can u please throw some light so that in output message determination the Output type should come automatically for Proof of delivery
Thanks and regards
shaileshUm... I think the message is pretty clear on this - the reason is "requirement 017 not fulfilled".
Requirements for output control may be found in VOFM transaction, under Requirements -> Output control. 017 is the standard one, the description says 'POD on goods issue'. According to the comments, the output is not issued if "POD status is initial" or "No output, if no goods receipt".
Either correct the document or remove this requirement in output configuration, if it's not applicable.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Can not install Windows 8.1 to a Bitlocker Pre-Provisioned volume
Hello, I'll come straight to the point. What I'm trying to do is to install Windows 8.1 Enterprise to a Pre-Provisioned volume but Windows does not let me do that. The steps I've performed are. With Microsoft ADK I created me a WinPE media which has
-
Mavericks Mail sync with Gmail - lost folders
I use gmail as my main email provider. I have had this syncronised to my MacBookPro, iPad and iPhone for a few years. It worked smothly. Whenever I created, modified or moved mail folders in the Mail app it was replicated in gmail. I recently updated
-
Hi Experts, I have requirement in KE24 report. When ever the credit notes or debit notes issued for a respective sales order user is able to see side by side credit/debit note for that respective sales order. I have tried in standard KE24 report but,
-
Struts - tiles definition not reflecting for a JSP
Hi everyone, I am struggling with this problem since 2 weeks..I will be thankful to you if u can tell me the solution...the problem is : In my tiles-defs.xml, all the definitions are working fine but for only one jsp, its not getting reflected. I wan
-
I don't have any photos in my mac at all yet here it's show i have almost 1 gb of photos how? i don't understand i tried looking for it yet i couldn't find it anywhere. Having a 128gb mac space is a big issue for me and all these are uselessly taking