PR to PO conversion error - Partial line items not getting converted
Hi All,
Automatic PR to PO conversion ( ME59N ) is not happening for few line items.
For the same Article,site, vendor combinations,its getting converted on few days and on few days its not.
No changes were made to the any.
1. Source List is created for the Article & Vendor combination. Validity is fine. Fixed vendor option is checked.
2. Info record is maintained.
3. Auto PO option is checked in Vendor Master
4. No release Strategy
Will the Purchase Group have any impact in the conversion?
Kindly share your views.
Thanks in adance.
Regards,
Bhaskar
It's going to be a data selection problem. If it was a problem with conversion you would see something recorded in the log (assuming you have the log parameter set to show all messages).
Make sure the Auto PO flags are set in the correct purchasing org and site. Does your requisition have a purcahsing org?
What selection critera do you have set in ME59N? You mention that that the problem only occurs on certain days so it could be related to the release date.
The only other thing I could suggest is authorisation checks. Are you approved for the correct activity types (the activity for ME59N is not create) , plants, purchasing groups etc.
Also keep in mind everything I have said may not be relevant to the IS-Retail solution you are using. I can't be certain if there are any differences in this area when you are running that solution. It might be worth asking the question in that forum http://scn.sap.com/community/retail
Similar Messages
-
Approvers of Rejected line items not getting removed -Process controlled WF
I have developed shopping cart approval using process controlled workflow. We are using SRM 7.0, patch level 9.
Decision set used is item based approval for partial documents (Type 4)
While testing I observed that when I reject any item, the corresponding approvers of that items are not getting removed.
As per your requirement, if we create SC with 2 items A and B. Based on various conditions
2 process levels are determined for item A, say approver X and approver Y at respective level.
3 process levels are determined for item B, say approver X, approver Z1 and Z2.
Approver X, rejects item A and approves item B. Since one item is rejected, the work item is sent to requestor for acceptance. All process levels are of type "Approval". Once the requestor clicks on "Accept" button, the item A, which is rejected gets deleted from the shopping cart.
However now when I see the Approval Process Overview, the current approver shown is Y. The work item is sent to approver Y and the value of the shopping cart is shown as 0.00. Logically the approver Y should have been removed from approval process.
Could you let me know if I am missing any step or do I need to do some coding to get rid of approvers of rejected items.
Regards,
Manish.We were using N-step process level on the item level contrast to example provide by SAP of N-step process leve on Header level. SAP uses standard tables /SAPSRM/D_WF_015 and /SAPSRM/D_WF_016 to implement the logic. We have customized the solution with logic on same line of sap but using bespoke tbale ZSAPSRM_D_WF_016. Let me know if anyone needs solution.
-
Freight line item not getting created in Invoice
Hi,
We are using Inbound IDOC to create invoice with freight line items in it, The message type used is INVOIC and the standard inbound function module is IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_MRM, The invoice which is getting created does not hold the freight line item in it. Actually we hope the indicator Goods Item/Delivery costs/Both which is present in the invoice (RM08M-XWARE_BNK) determines the creation of freight items or not. In our case the invoice is getting created with the indicator value as 1 but we hope the value 3 would be required for frieght items.
Please let me know if the above message type and the standard function module would be able to handle the creation of frieght line items or we need to look for some other option.
Regards,
Prabaharan.GHi Prabaharan,
i have the same request for posting planed freight costs with the IDOC.
Do you have a solution or workaround meantime ?
Thanks and best regars,
Roman Zimola -
"The Customer line items not getting cleared through F-28"
Hi,
There are 4 line items when going into option FBL5N . However, payment has been received, and when going into option F-28 to post the payment, only 2 of the 4 lines appear, and the full payment cannot be allocated. Please advise why all 4 lines do not appear.
Regards
Harish MadhavanHi,
Thanks a lot for the prompt response.
I have checked that, any other settings which I can check.
Thanks
Regards
Harish -
PO line item not getting invoiced...
Hi SAP Gurus,
I am facing one problem.PO has been processed successfully but invoice is not getting generated for one of the line item.Can you guide me in this issue ?Hi,
You may be trying to create the invoice without doing the Good Receipt for that line item.
Rgds,
SAP Friend -
STPO 2nd line item not getting shipping tab
Hi All,
We have a issue with STP0, user created the STP0( different company code) with 3 line items of same materials. The first line items shipping tab is appering but second & third line items are not getting the shipping tab in item detail
Please help me to resolve the issue.
Thanks and Regards
Chandrashekar.RHi,
Thanks for your update,
First line item and second line item materials are same. i have checked the sales views for the supply plant.
Regards
Chandrashekar.R -
FI Archiving - System error: Customer/vendor line item not on OI basis
While archiving FI Documetns using object FI_Documnt, I am getting message System error: Customer/vendor line item not on OI basis for few non archivable documents. Is it like these also open items and can not be able to archive them. Or what is the root cause of these error message.
Regards,
ShaileshHi Adisha,
This error pertains to the accounting fundamentals and SAP does not have anything to do with this....you ask yourself that if you were not using SAP and simlar problem came your way what would you have done...this has no solution...
Either you wait for the next invoice with big amount but which seems bit impractical..
In this we really need to consult the Accounting Standards to see what it could allow.
Regards,
Chintan Joshi -
Error - Balancing Line Item Profit Center not filled in Line Item 007
Hi
I am trying to do a transfer posting from one vendor account to another. However, system is giving an error - Balancing Line Item Profit Center not filled in line Item 001. Pls suggest.
Regards
Vaibhavhi vaibhav
you go through this Tcode FAGL3KEH and maintain default profit centre. in the error message system shown GL accounts
hope you userstand
thanks
dharmendar -
Cncltion of partial line items in the MBST is notopening the linkeddel line
Hi,
We are posting the GR with 503 mvt type with ref to delivery. In this process when some of the line items have to be returned, we are posting MBST against those line items. To cancel / reverse the same in delivery using VL09, system (does not re-open those line items) is not allowing us to cancel partial line items. Instead the entire delivery is being cancelled.
The problem to cancel / reverse the entire delivery & material document is some of the line items are are already consumed.
When we cancel/reverse some of the line items using MBST and there by cancel the material documents, system does not allow us to cancel the particular deliveriesdoes not re-open those line items). When we cancel the entire delivery, the link between the original delivery and already consumed materials is lost.
I guess this is Standard SAP behaviour and some one would have encountered with a similar problem.
Request you to check and let me know how to resolve this issue.
Thanks / SandeepThe MBST is cancellation of material documents or in other word you are cancelling the action whic were carried out earlier.
You might have noticed that when you are using MBST and entering input parameter as material documents system by default will carry all the infoermation which were there in that material documents.
I fyou weants to cancel part of material you can do this in MIGO sereen and select the option of return delivery and saelect the line item which youw wish to send it back or return to vendor.
For partial returns you should always use MIGO, RETURN DELIVERY against MATERIAL DOCUMENT, put in the material document No. and then whichever line you want partially return, you enter the partial quantity and save the document.
Hope this clear. -
Cancelation of partial line items in the MBST is not opening the delivery
Hi Gurus,
We are posting the GR with 503 mvt type with ref to delivery. In this process when some of the line items have to be returned, we are posting MBST against those line items. To cancel / reverse the same in delivery using VL09, system (does not re-open those line items) is not allowing us to cancel partial line items. Instead the entire delivery is being cancelled.
The problem to cancel / reverse the entire delivery & material document is some of the line items are are already consumed.
When we cancel/reverse some of the line items using MBST and there by cancel the material documents, system does not allow us to cancel the particular deliveriesdoes not re-open those line items). When we cancel the entire delivery, the link between the original delivery and already consumed materials is lost.
I guess this is Standard SAP behaviour and some one would have encountered with a similar problem.
Request you to check and let me know how to resolve this issue.
Thanks / SandeepThe MBST is cancellation of material documents or in other word you are cancelling the action whic were carried out earlier.
You might have noticed that when you are using MBST and entering input parameter as material documents system by default will carry all the infoermation which were there in that material documents.
I fyou weants to cancel part of material you can do this in MIGO sereen and select the option of return delivery and saelect the line item which youw wish to send it back or return to vendor.
For partial returns you should always use MIGO, RETURN DELIVERY against MATERIAL DOCUMENT, put in the material document No. and then whichever line you want partially return, you enter the partial quantity and save the document.
Hope this clear. -
Error : Balancing Field " Profit Center" in line item not filled
Dear Friends,
I have a specific issue, as my client while posting inventory differences in [MI07] an error is populating as Balancing Field "Profit Center" in line item not filled.
Please help me in solving the issue where we can assign the profit center other than in materal master as they donot maintained any profit center in material master for all materials
Thanks inadvance
SriHi BK , thanks for your answer
in kch3 there are several profit center groups and how can we identify whcih profit center is assigned to whcih profit center group
regards
sri -
Line item not relevant for payment release
Dear Expert,
When I select payment block : 'Payment Request' in FB60. Error Message appear "Line item not relevant for payment release".
I also have set payment block in master vendor and OBB8.
Can you tell me why the error message still appear?
Kindly need your help
Thanks and Regards,
YLDo you have any workflow variant in place?
Moreover, when you have already set the Payment block at Master level, you need not to fix it in transaction level.
Vendor itself will not get paid until unless you remove the block option
Thanks -
Dear All,
I have facing one issue at the time posting in MIRO.
I post one of migo doc in date 03/01/2010 , the entry is:( with same material )
Post key description amt curr.( USD)
89 Stk.RM -IMP 32100.00
96 PL.VND.RM.IMP GR/IR 32100.00
40 Purchase RM-IMP 32100.00
50 Purchase offset. 32100.00
And Miro Posting on date 23/03/2010
Post key description amt curr.( USD)
31 xyz Vendor 32100.00
86 PL.VND.RM.IMP GR/IR 32100.oo
89 Stk.RM -IMP -
40 Purchase RM-IMP -
50 Purchase offset. -
But when I post for another po in migo on date 03/01/2010
Post key description amt curr.( USD)
89 Stk.RM -IMP 76800.00
96 PL.VND.RM.IMP GR/IR 76800.00
40 Purchase RM-IMP 76800.00
50 Purchase offset. 76800.00
and miro posting on date 19/02/2010
Post key description amt curr.( USD)
32 yz Vendor 76800.00
86 PL.VND.RM.IMP GR/IR 76800.00
89 Stk.RM -IMP Line item not generated
40 Purchase RM-IMP Line item not generated
50 Purchase offset. Line item not generated
Can any one tell why line item not generated for miro posting .
Regards
MilindHi,
The extra line items will be generated when there are any exchange rate diffrences are there then only shows.
Other wise it wont show those extra line items
Please check group currency , global currency etc. for your extra line items -
Line item is getting Switched in OBD, created with ref to PO
I have created a PO# 4500189441.
In that PO there are two line items as below:
Line item# 10 C792X1CG 280
Line item# 20 X792X1MG 160
But when we create an OBD with ref to this PO in VL10D, line item are getting switched as below:
In OBD# 89490798,
Line item# 10
X792X1MG
160
Line item# 20
C792X1CG
280
Can you please let us know the reason behind it or is there any configuration for this?
Thanks & Regards,
Tanmay Mondal
SAP SD ConsultantHi Tanmay,
First Check the Delivery type configuration in the Logistic Execution ---Delivery Type IMG path
Your Delivery type should have Item Requirement as '202' and check the Default Order type assigned to it.
Next go to the Specify Copy Control for Deliveries-----In that select the copy control from the Default sales doc. type which is assigned to the delivery type and the Delivery type which you are Using
Select and in the Item Data click on the delivery item category which is assigned to the delivery type.
In the details of the selection check the Item Data in the Data Transfer Block.
The routine assigned to it should be '202'
This will Solve your Issue.
Regards -
SCs line items are getting splitted into different POs.
Hi Experts,
I am using SRM 5.0 (EBP4.0) ECS.
When operational purchaser is doing carry out sourcing then SC line items are getting splitted into different POs whereas all the criteria are same I mean all the SC line items are having same
1.Purcg.Grp
2.Purch.Org.
3.Company Code
4.Plant/Location
5.Vendor (Preferred)
6.All product Cat.are assigned to one system only.
(In BBP_PD for the SC I dont see any reason for the split)
7.Using Intended for Gouping Option also at the time of Carry out sourcing.
Earlier also I have raised the same question but I didnt get any reply, only some hints and other reference and help bu Yann but I am still facing the same issue and Pls help me if there is any OSS note for it .
Here I'd like to let you know that I have seen same ticket and checked all the possible cause for split but never find any reason for split in this case.Pls help me on this issue urgently.
Brgds
GopeshHi
As Yann told, there might be some standard BADIs for which we need to either modify the standard code in this case.
Has SAP replied on this problem with any comments - on your OSS message yet ?
<u>As far as I know, the following BADIs are some how, involved in the creation of the Local SRM PO. </u>
<b>BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI </b>
( ECS: PO Transfer to Logistics Backend )
<b>BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI </b>
( Control Extended Classic Scenario )
<b>BBP_GROUP_LOC_PO </b>
( Exit Grouping of Items for Local Purchase Orders )
Please send me your detailed requirements at my email id for further analysis.
[email protected]
Hope this will help.
Please reward suitable points, incase it suits your requirements.
Regards
- Atul
Maybe you are looking for
-
The list of blocked invoices is incomplete
Hello, I have encountered a situation when running T-code MRBR to list all blocked invoice however get one message as below: The list of blocked invoices is incomplete Message no. M8 657 Kindly suggest us why So. Regards: Tata Reddy
-
hallo guys anybody can help me my question is what is the disadvantage of refurbished ipad and if i buy one does it include iOS 5 and iCloud or not thanks in advance to answer me Best regards
-
hi i used to have O2 pay monthly contract but it ended in September 2012, since the contract expired I keep requesting O2 to unlock my iphone4. But they keep saying we are unable to unlock because of error. This is going on for 2 years. O2 keep sayin
-
How do I change my phone number in Messages
Under "Preferences" - Accounts.... It says "You can be reached for messages at: And thern it lists a phone # and any email addresses you have attached to the account. I'd like to change the phone number. Is that possible? My account mac/me/icloud a
-
Finished Products At Real Real Cost
Hello Gurus, I'm working on a requierement where the cost of all finished products need to be calculated according to: 1) Real material price of all components (raw materials and only raw materials of semifinished products) 2) Real material consumpti