Question on MIGO and MIRO

Hi All,
I have a question like is there any role like that we have first do MIGO (Goods Receipt) and then go to MIRO (invoice receipt r verification) r we can do either of them first.
Please give me clear clarification on this.
Thanku

Hi,
When we receive the goods, the accounting entry is passed (auto):
Dr. Stock / Expenses
Cr. GR/IR Account (Liability is created)
When Invoice is verfied against the above PO item:
Dr. GR/IR Account (Liability is cleared)
Cr Vendor Account
The above is standard normal process. At the monthend, balance represents the liability to the extend material/ services received and invoices are yet to book.
In PO, there check-box is optional for GR based IV. Due to which the above two can be done independently also. If the check box is selected, IR can be done only after GR.
Hope this helps, if yes, please assign points.
Regards,
Harish

Similar Messages

Value difference for GR/IR Clearing Account in case of MIGO and MIRO.

Hello Experts,
One of our client has asked me about clarification regarding GR/IR Clearing Account shows different values when MIGO and MIRO posting. Scenario is that,
SEZ
Calculation of import Duty
Input goods
Material Base Value
       2,171,385
Landing Cost
             21,714
For computing Customs landing charges need to be added
BED @
10%
           219,310
Loaded in material cost
CVD, @
12%
           289,489
Credit taken
Customs Education Cess
3%
             15,264
Loaded in material cost
ADDL Duty
4%
           108,686
Credit taken
Customs Duty
           632,749
CVD
12%
           219,310
All duty
4%
           108,686
Cenvat
           327,996
CST
       43,427.70
2214812.7
Hence Material cost in GR/IR should be Rs. 22,14,813
Diff (2219092-2214813= 4279)
Whereas it is taking Rs. 22,19,092
My concern is that GR/IR Clearing Account consider only Material cost and non deductible tax amount i.e. CST which is loaded on material cost but system consider some different values, please check the above calculation. When user post MIRO in that case system automatically konck off GR/IR Clearing Account and post difference amount i.e. RS. 4279 to Inventory Account which is wrong. I dont know how system behaves in such manner.
Please giude me on this issue as soon as possible.
Regards,
Vishal Jadhav

Discussion moved. Please use Internationalization and Unicode for CIN related queries.

Non Cenvatable material - Value not matching in MIGO and MIRO

Dear SAP experts!
We have the following problem.
We are using TAXINN.
We create a Purchase Order for a raw material, which is non cenvatable for a particular vendor.
When we carry out Goods Receipt, we change the Material type from Raw Material to Non Cenvatable in the Material Type in the Excise Item Tab and post the BED and AED values, the values are getting inventorized correctly.
And MIRO posting is also happening correctly. Both, MIGO and MIRO values are tallying. i.e, The total value is sum of Basic PriceBEDAED+CST.
But, if we change any of the BED or AED value at the time of posting GR in the excise Invoice tab, then we are facing problem.
Value during MIGO posting is correct. That is the total value is sum of Basic PriceBEDAED+CST.
But, During MIRO posting, the value of BED and AED is not getting picked.
The value during MIRO shows only Basic Price+CST and not BED amount and AED amount.
Can any one tell me, where it is going wrong.
Your response is highly appreciated.
Thanks and Regards,
Muthuraman.K

you have to used non deductable condition type in Taxinn to post tax to inventory
that is
JMIP IN: BED inventory % say 8%
JAIP IN AED inventory % Say 4 %
JMX2     IN: A/P BED inventor 100 %
JAX2     IN: A/P AED inventor 100%
and the above condition should be assigned to proper Classify Condition Types
TAXINN     JMIP     BEDINVENTP BED Inventory Percentage
TAXINN     JAIP     AEDINVENTP AED Inventory Percentage
TAXINN     JMX2     BEDINVENTT BED Inventory Total
TAXINN     JAX2     AEDINVENTT AED Inventory Total
And also u will have to assign condition type JMX2 and JAX2 in Maintain Excise Defaults
this will solve your issue

Why req MIGO and MIRO in third party scenario

Hello All,
In third party scenario why we req to do MIGO in ref to PO.
In 3rd party we create sales order with item cat TAS.
We got the PR
with ref to PR we create PO.
then we do MIGO and MIRO
also If vendor is delivering the goods why we do the Delivery and PGI and then Invoice
Why not Invoice with ref to sales order.
regards,
abhijit

Hi
In Third Party sales, the Item category is TAS ,if the Vendor directly supplies to the end customer.
In Item category TAS, "Billing Relevance" is "F", i,e. Order related billing as per invoice quantity.
If the Item category of the Third Party item is TAS, then Schedule line category is CS in standard. If you will go to CS, you will find , the "Delivery relevance" field is blank and there is no "Goods movement" also. That means no Delivery takes place against the Sales order, so no goods issue.
This clearly indicates, we do not create any Delivery and no goods receipt takes place in third party sales process, when the vendor directly sends the goods to the customer.
Once the goods are send to the end customer, Vendor creates an invoice and sends to the ordering company. Now, ordering company goes for Invoice verification ,what the vendor has sent to him. We only go for MIRO here and not MIGO.
After that, the ordering company, creates the Customer invoice with reference to the Sales order(placed by its customer) and sends it to its customer.
Complete process:
Once the order is received from the custome(say ABC)r, the company (say XYZ) creates a Sales order ---> Purchase requisition is automatically triggered from the sales order -
> from this Purch requisition a PO is created for the vendor -
> aginst the PO, Vendor delivers the goods to the customer ABC and charge the ordering company,sends invoice for the same to the ordering company XYZ -
> Ordering company XYZ does Vendor's invoice verification and creates a Customer invoice with reference to customer's(ABC) order and sends to the customer ABC.
Some times Vendor sends the goods to the ordering company and then ordering company delivers the goods to its customer.
Vendor does not deliver directly to the end customer in this case.
In this case Item category is TAB and Schedule line category is CB.
Here, Billing relevance is "A" - (Delivery related billing) in the Item category TAB, that means here Delivery takes place and Billing is created with reference to the Delivery created to the customer.
In Schedule line category CB, you will find, 'Delivery relevance" field is activated and there is a movement type "601".
So, Delivery and goods issue both takes place here.
Here we go for both MIGO and MIRO.

Update Ledger group in BKPF at the time of MIGO and MIRO

Hi Friends,
In our current implementation we have requirement to update a certain Ledger group, to restrict the postings in all ledgers, at the time of positng in MIGO and MIRO.
Can you please let me know how we do this.
Waiting for your reply,
Madan Mohan

Hi Santhosh,
Thanks for your reply. But in the substitutions at header and line item level i didnt find the 'U300' userexit.
Can you suggest me at what level i can find that user exit.
Thanks and Regards,
Madan

Returns to vendor agter MIGO and MIRO

hI,
I have made on PO, did MIGO and MIRO for the same (CIN)
Now i want to send back the material to vendor in two scenarios
1) After MIGO
2) After MIGO and MIRO
3) After payment has been done.
Regards,
Satyendra

Hi,
For First case you can use 102 mov type against material document to return material.
For Second & Third cases
1) Create a return po and check the return item field in the po detail.
2) create a return goodds receipt with migo. 161 will happen automatically.
3) create a credit memo thru. miro.
4) crease a excise invoice for other movements thru J1IS (if material is excisable.)
5) post a excise invoice thru J1IV
Revert back if any doubts.
Ashok
Reward is useful.

Business area in migo and miro

hi,
i activated business area financial statement in ob65.and i make gl field status and posting key field status business area is optional.and i assigned business area to plant in OMJ7.
while doing migo and miro business area is not taking for gl a/c.
is there any further settings required for this .please give me the solution to resolve this issue.

Hi
Encountering the same issue ...any suggestions pls
Have activated BAFS in OB65 and assigned Plant Division combn to Business area in enterprise structure. But still business area is not getting defaulted in MM and excise utilization transactions
Thanks and Regards

Path to tcode MIGO and MIRO???

I can't find the path to tow tcodes MIGO and MIRO.Help me, please!!!
Thank you for reading my post^^

Hi,
MIGO
SAP Menu> Logistics-> MM-> Inventory Management> Goods Movement--> MIGO
MIRO
SAP menu-> Logistics> MM->Logistic Invoice verification-> document entry----MIRO
Regards,
Biju K

Purchase Order, MIGO and MIRO

Dear All,
Please guide me how to map the below scenario in SAP.
We have to procure Material 'C' for that we have to get the Material 'A' from "X" Vendor. And it has to be delivered to "Y" Vendor. Then vendor "Y" uses Material 'B' and he does some processing and deliver Material 'C' to us. How to raise a purchase order, how to do MIGO and MIRO.
Thanks & Regards,
Kumar

Hi Kumar,
1. Raise the PO(1) against the X vendor (materila A). in PO give the delivery address as Vendor Y..( it is in PO itemdetail tab)...
2. create one more PO(2) (as subcontract) with item cater as L and issue to Vendor Y....
Item C should have BOM as mateila A...
3. Now you receive the materila A at vendor Y as against the PO(1).... (vendor X deliver the materila directly to vendor Y)...
Now for when you do migo for the PO(1), it will hapen for movement type 101 and in backgorund it create the 541movement type to vendor Y ( issue componet to sub contract vendor )
4. Settle the Invoice of Vendor X in MIRO seperatly.
5. receive the Goods from the subcontract vendor (y) throug MIGO
6. do MIRo for PO(2)
Hope you understoud this...
REgards
anand

Account entries at tie of migo and miro

Dear Gurus,
please let me know about the account entries at time of MIGO and MIRO.
thanking you in advance
Best regards,
Raghu
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on May 22, 2011 3:20 PM

Dear,
During MIGO Goods receipt,
Inventory stores a/c - Debit entry of value 'x'
GR/IR clearing a/c - Credit entry of value 'x'
For MIRO,
Vendor a/c - Credit entry of total invoice value
GR/IR clearing a/c - Debit entry of value 'x' & Few other entries
Regards,
Syed Hussain.

Same PR still outstanding in MD04 although the PR-PO-MIGO and MIRO happend

Dear experts,
following is the scenario-
for material type: V1 PR is created (01/03/2011) once it went below the reorder point with delivery date 01/11/2011 as per the lead time (7 days) and PO. now the goods receipt happens on 01/21/2011 and IR on 01/26/2011.
and again the SAME PR (with exception message 07) as above is again shownig in MD04 with the same creation date and PO but its open -
Question: does the PR is again outstanding because the delivery of the goods was not as per the lead time (why the same PR is still showing although the PR-PO-MIGO-MIRO already ahppened for the material)?
thanks for your replies.
Edited by: Coolio7 on Jan 28, 2011 8:21 PM

Propably some one created a PO directly instead of converting the PR and PR is not getting deleted because it is firmed. Delete the firming indicator and check.
Cheers
Rav

Exchange rate difference while posting ME21N MIGO and MIRO

Hi All,
I am facing one problem with exchange rate type between M and EURX and EURX is maintanined in the SPRO>SAP Netweaver>General Settings>currencies>Check Exchange rate types
EXRT : EURX
Usage    : EMU Reg,fixed
Ref.Curr    : EUR
Buy.ra.at
Sall .Rat.At
Inv
EMU   :X
FIXED
Scenario:
Company(USD) is maintaning Exchange rate type: M and no exchange rates are maintained for USD:EUR or EUR:USD.
Eur is maintaing in Exchange rate type EURX.
1) PO (ME21N) is posting for the Vendor on posting date 01/01/2008. Transaction currency is EUR and company code currency is USD and Quantity : 25000
--> Exchange rate 'M' is not maintained for EUR and values are picking from the EURX Type. In the PO, Exchange rate is picking correctly from the EURX table entries on 01/01/2008.
2) MIGO: GR is posted on 01/25/2008 and with 15000 Quantity. Exchange rate is getting currecly from the table on 01/25/2008.
3) MIRO: IR is posted on 02/15/2008 and Vendor Account is picking correct exchange rate from the table but GR/IR account is caluculations EUR:USD is differntly .
Note: It is not GR based IR.
Ex:
PK AC                DESCRIPTION                    Tran Curr (EUR)    Local Curr USD
31 5004789     Vendor Account                       24,718.48-            38,777.12- USD
86 2525000      A/P-GR/IR NON-INV                24,718.48            38,883.73 USD
91 6584785      SERV-OTHER O/S                    0.00                 106.61- USD
Here GR/IR account is cal dirrently.
4) Credit Memo posted against IR on 03/25/2008. Exchange rate is given while posting CM same as Invoice. But system rate is different. Here also how the GR/IR is calculating is question is it not taking from Table or from any other rate types . Same problem like IR for GR/IR account.
Entry is posted like
PK ACC         Description                            Tran curr(EUR) Local curr(USD)
21 5004789     Vendor                                   24,718.48        38,777.13 USD
96 2525000     /P-GR/IR NON-INV                   24,718.48-      38,892.22- USD
81 6584785     SERV-OTHER O/S                     0.00            115.09 USD
This problem is same like GR and also SPL document is posting differenly for ZG and ZL ledger.
ZL ledger is posting same like Accounting CM document ZG is posting with the different amount . This different amount is nothing but the exchange rate as per the posting date 03/25/2008. Exchange rate on 03/25/2008 is differe from IR date 02/15/2008 .
ZL ledger is calculating based on the 02/15/2008 date and ZG ledger is calculating based on the 03/25/2008 . Difference between Exchange rate entered in the CM and 03/25/2008 table entry rate is showing exchange rate difference field in the Addtional field in the document display.
Thanks in Advance.

Dear Friends,
Thanks for your helpful answers, actually we are in big export business. So we have to clear 100s of invoice lines with payments at one go, (which obviously being booked at different dates) so it would be very difficult for the user to go one by one invoice.
My concern is, why system does not calculate exchange rate difference based on actual documents, i.e. Invoice to payments only. I think there might be some configuration needed to implement this functionality.
Please help.
Regards

Expert..What should we do if we did a mess of MIGO and MIRO in PO history?

Much appreciate if anyone could help on this issue.
What we have done:
we have a Purchase Order of 3 line items with the quantity in 300,200,100, respectively. the net price for each unit is $1.
In MIGO:
1. we posted MIGO with wrong quantity and wrong 'amount in LC' as follows:
quantity = 1;
'amount in LC' = $ 600
2. we reverse this goods receipt with correct quantity and wrong 'amount in LC'.
quantity = -1;
'amount in LC' = $ -1
In MIRO
we wrongly posted the receipt as follows:
Quantity = 350;
Amount = $ 350
then again, we did another wrong thing:
we deleted the line items 2 and 3 in Purchase order in order to close the commitment in the Project.
Now we are end up to a very bad situation:
The invoice amount is not matched up to the PO, and
the Project still can not be closed due to the commitment sitting in the Project WBS.
What should we do now, experts???
Much appreciate if you can help us out.
Points are generously assigned!

To Kishore Kumar Chiluka,
I finished the first step - delete line item 2 and 3 successfully.
Now I start to reverse Goods Receipts posted against in 1st line item.
In the PO history of 1st line item, we posted the following material documents.
1. wrongly post MIGO as follows.
Movement Type = 101
quantity = 400;
'amount in LC' = $ 400
2. tried to reverse the wrong material document as follows, unfortunately, 'amount in LC' again is wrong.
Movement Type = 122
quantity = - 400;
'amount in LC' = $ - 500
3. Now we want to follow your instructions to reverse step 2 using MBST, however we end up with the error message saying
PU Ordered quantity exceeded by 400 EA. Message no. M7022.
Diagnosis
The specified stock level or quantity is exceeded by 400 EA.
What should we do to cancel the wrongly reversal material doc in step2??
in addition, we do not have idea how 'amount in LC' again is determined, because we did not put in ount in LC' = $ - 500.
Much appreciate for your help!!
Points are generiously given.

Exchange rate difference in MIGO and MIRO

Dear Experts,
Our local currency is INR.
We have created PO and MIGO on 31.03.2015 with exchange rate 62.5908 without tick on fixed exchange rate in PO. OB08 is also same on 31.03.2015. But at the time of MIRO system showing error massage for configure KDM even if i put exchange rate manually (62.5908) in MIRO.
                    GR/IR Dr         62.5908
                           To Vendor        NIL
                    Total                  63.5908
I have also made down payment to this in UDS
Local Curr(INR)
Doc. Curr (USD)
Ex. Rate
PO No.
       32,081,541.24
           505,002.42
               63.52750
5500200091
       93,721,425.00
       1,494,998.00
               62.69000
Please advice how can i debug exchange rate 63.5908. if i assign GL on KDM then system will debit this difference in that GL
Thanks in advance. Your suggestions will be highly appreciated.
Best Regards,

Hi Monika
Please also exchange how you have set up the treatment of exchange rate differences for your company code for LIV under the path:
IMG>Materials Management>Logistics Invoice verification> Incoming Invoice>Configure how exchange rate differences are treated
Check if you have N or X maintained here. If you have any of this config, you will need to maintain the GL Account in KDM as well
Regards
Sanil Bhandari

CST and VAT added to material at the time of migo and miro

Hi,
we are maintaining FV11 record in that case amount is displaying but condition value is showing "0"
Thanks a lot in advance for your confirmation,
Neelima
Edited by: Jeyakanthan A on Sep 7, 2011 10:03 AM

Hi,
VAT can be inventoried or can be used for Set-Off based on how material behave to the business. VAT can be inventoried, you should have a condition type with assigning of NVV key in tax procedure .VAT can be used for Set-Off , you should have another condition type and assigning to an accounting key ( For example: ZZV {new on}not to the NVV key certainly) in tax procedure in OBYZ t.code & in t.code: OB40 , ZZV should assign to G/L account for VAT Set-Off.
For VAT - inventoried & VAT -Set-Off, you should maintain records(FV11)with respective condition type for VAT - inventoried & VAT -Set-Off with individual tax code with tax rate.
For VAT can be inventoried, it will affect on accounting in MIGO transaction adding VAT amount to Inventory Account.
For Set-Off VAT, it will affect in MIRO transaction.
Generally CST always inventoried by business, it will affect on accounting in MIGO transaction adding CST amount to Inventory Account and you have to have a condition type for CST with assigning of NVV key in tax procedure, tax code for CST and maintain record (FV11) with CST condition type with CST tax code with a tax rate.
Regards,
Biju K

Question on MIGO and MIRO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for