Relating to balance sheet

Here my client requirement is Two Balance sheets.
1 books of accounts
2 income tax point
my exact question is we create the two balance sheets. but we posting the values to the g/l accounts are same in these two cases.
what is the use and how it differentiate these two at the poin.
any p&l balance difference
r
any
please give me the solution

Hi,
You need to be more specific in description of the requirement.
The requirement could be that the company follows a different finalcial year, say k4 (Jan-Dec), whereas the tax year is Apr-Mar.
If so, then you will need to use SL to generate statements for the tax purposes.
There could be a different classification/treatment of accounts between the two, then you would need to create two different FSVs.
Cheers.

Similar Messages

F.01 Balance Sheet-Report to see in company code wise

Hi Experts
Goodevening
We are recently upgraded to ECC.6 version of SAP.
The issue is, when we use Tcode F.01 relating to Balance Sheet Report it is giving the result in Business Area Wise of all the assets and liabilities.
Is there any possiblility to see the report in company code wise and not the business area wise. since the same asset is displayed in different business area wise.
eg.,
21100/1011004 Gross Block - Intangible assets 647,080.00
21100/1011004 Gross Block - Intangible assets    22,048.00
21100/1011004 Gross Block - Intangible assets 2,847,283.25
21100/1011004 Gross Block - Intangible assets 92,040.00 21100/1011005 Gross Block - Plant And Machin75,258,226.67 21100/1011005 Gross Block - Plant And Machin   216,968.87
          the problem is like above
now we want to see the report in lumsum, without business area wise.
pls suggest me how to get the report
thanks in advance
warm regards
kishore

Dear Kishore,
While executing in F.01 give all parameters without Business Area and Execute
Apart from that if you need to additional thing go through dynamic selection in F.01.
Assign point.........thanks in Advance.
Rgds
Madhuri

Trading Parner Not Inherited to Cross Company Balance Sheet Line item

Hi,
I posted cross company document using document type that is already untick in field 'inter-company posting' and 'enter tpid'.
My accounting entries is as per below:
   Co1000   Cr Balance Sheet   $250
   Co1001   Dr Expense            $10
   Co1001   Dr Expense            $240
Upon posting, TPID only populated in the cross-company code clearing line item only. Not to all of the GL line item.
However;
1) If using the same set of data (cross company posting) whereby the Balance Sheet line is replaced with P&L account, the posted document will inherit TPID to all line item.
2) If posting in single company's book, using related party customer account with the same balance sheet as per example above, TPID is inherited to the BS line item. example is as per below:
     Co1000 Dr Customer1001   $300
     Co1000 Cr balance Sheet    $300
Is there any reason or notes that can be implemented so that for cross company transaction that contains BS account, TPID is being populated in all line item?
TQ.

Hi,
If the Trading Partner is maintained in OX16 and you are still getting this problem then, please refer to OSS Note No.:779844 and 438076.
Regards,
Kiron Kumar T.

Function types for Balance Sheet Planning missing in SEM-BPS 6.0

Hi BPS experts,
After upgrading our BI-system from SEM 4.0 to SEM 6.0 (level 10) as part of the upgrade from BW 3.5 to BI 7.0 (level 15), the BPS function types for balance sheet planning are not available in the planning environment (Transaction code BPS0).
According to the SAP Library the balance sheet planning functions in SEM-BPS comprises of 6 standard function types - one of them is "Depreciation":
<a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_sem60/helpdata/en/0a/242537cedf2056e10000009b38f936/frameset.htm">help.sap.com -> Business Planning and Simulation (BW-BPS)</a>
Menu path: Business Planning Functions -> Functions for Balance Sheet Planning
In our existing SEM 4.0 we are using "Depreciation" and the functions based on this function type are of course short dumping when executed in our upgraded system (SEM 6.0) as the function type does not exist here.
Odd though - we do have the function type "Allocation" available in SEM 6.0, which should be delivered with SEM together with the Balance Sheet Planning function types (It is listed directly under "Business Planning Functions" in the SAP Library) .
I have tried to figure out whether we missed out on activating something during or after the system installation, but our basis consultant has not found anything in the installation guides related to this issue. Also I was wondering whether it could be a simple matter of activating some Business Content but without any luck.
Does anybody know why the Balance Sheet Function Types are not available in SEM-BPS 6.0?
Kind regards,
Lars
PS: Our system status is:
SAP_ABA     700     0013     SAPKA70013     Cross-Application Component
SAP_BASIS     700     0013     SAPKB70013     SAP Basis Component
PI_BASIS     2005_1_700     0013     SAPKIPYJ7D     PI_BASIS 2005_1_700
ST-PI     2005_1_700     0005     SAPKITLQI5     SAP Solution Tools Plug-In
SAP_BW     700     0015     SAPKW70015     SAP NetWeaver BI 7.0
FINBASIS     600     0010     SAPK-60010INFINBASIS     FINBASIS 600 : Add-On Supplement
SEM-BW     600     0010     SAPKGS6010     SEM-BW 600 : Add-On Supplement
BI_CONT     703     0007     SAPKIBIIP7     Business Intelligence Content
Message was edited by:
        Lars B Rasmussen

Hi Lars,
It seems not all the planning function from SEM BPS are available in BW BPS. Please check the links below: -
what is the difference between BW 3.5 BPS and SEM BPS 4.0
BW- BPS and SEM- BPS
SEM-BPS VS BW-BPS
BCS Doc
Regards,
SK

Business Area is not pulling for Balance Sheet Accounts

Hi,
For few Balance Sheet GL Accounts (From MM side), Business area is not pulling while doing MM Cycle. For other Balance Sheet GL Accounts (From MM side), system is pulling the Business area by default.
I have checked all the Field Status Group configuration and all. Still could not find the route cause for this. Can any one help me why it is not pulling Business area for Balance sheet accounts when doing MM cycle.
what should i do if system has to pull Business area for Inventory Related Balance sheet GL Accounts?
Kindly Help me..
Thanks
Sunil

Hi,
in OMJ7, assignement were there properly. Still why i am not able to pull Business area for Balance Sheet Accounts.
I Can give one Clue: For Inventory Finished Goods, system is pulling Business area and for Inventory Raw material and Inventory Semi-Finished Goods system is not pulling the Business area.
This is my problem...
Thanks
Sunil

Difference of balance in balance sheet report & Business area wise report

Dear Group Members!!
In my company user wants to generate Business are wise Report
Difference of balance in balance sheet report & Business area wise report from same t code
Balances are different if enter business area, & if I execute the report with out entering any business area. Transaction code S_ALR_87012284 - Balance Sheet / Profit and Loss Statement.
The difference amount to be considered as data entry made with out using business area?
How do I rectify this?
Your comment will be helpful for me
Shamulheq

Hi Shamulheq
While working with business area you must first recognize that they are not company code dependent and can be used cross-company. Also depending on the SAP release you are working with postings to Business Area may not 100% guarantee, since there are cases where rules or standard SAP is not available and line items posted will be carried out without BA. For SAP releases not using the NEW GL, the setting up of adjustments accounts and monthly execution of adjustment programs would provide the vehicle to relate and adjust any missing BA at B/S and P/L level. If you are using NEW GL the document splitting would help to set the rules where every single line item would get a business area.
I assume that you are using the classic GL. The execution of T code S_ALR_87012284 - Balance Sheet / Profit and Loss Statement without business area retrieves all posting entered for any given company code regardless the account was posted with or without business area, this can be clearly displayed when you select the radio button for Classic Navigation. If you filter by Business Area, then the report will isolate the output data accordingly (The balances should be smaller). When using the classic GL you have to make sure that the financial statement version you use to execute the report, includes that the technical (Adjustment accout) account(s) that is used for the adjustment programs, so the correction to buisness areas is also included.
In conlcusion I think you have to make all this considerations, in order to better understand where the differences come from.
Hope this helps.
GG

BALANCE SHEET WITH UNASSIGNED NODES

First of all hello everybody,
In spite of being involved with balance sheet and P&L query I´m facing a problem never had before. We´re using the virtual infocube 0FIGL_V10 and its own query provided by Business Content.
Up to yesterday everything worked fine and showed up balance sheet and its nodes properly according to report in ECC. FI consultants decided to make changes in Balance Structure and turned on both credit and debit indicators in a couple of nodes. From then on relationed accounts did not appear within balance sheet but below unassigned nodes, obviously it should work properly once updated data by means of signs and so on. I removed content and reload 0GLACCEXT (its hierarchy), 0GL_ACCOUNT and infocube 0FIGL_C10 and kept failing.
Even i checked if function module supported by 0FIGL_V10 was modified and not at all.
Does anyone know what´s wrong? Is a problem of ECC customizing (don´t think so but...)? Am i missing any step?
Any suggestion would be appreciated...
Thanks in advace.

Thanks for your replies!
Simon you were right. By checking up 0BAL_DEPEND I found out that someone had disabled certain mapped fields in transfer rules...one of them was PLUMI -> 0BAL_DEPEND.
I found an article about an balance sheet sample with this field but i didn´t pay attention to.
I shall activate transfer rules and so on from BC again and hope solving it.
Thanks again.

Condition type for fee - no change of moving price or balance sheet account

Hi, hope you can help me.
We need a new condition type for a kind of fee which has to be paid to the vendor and used in the purchase order.
This is a condition type which
- has to be part of the invoice
- has to be posted as a kind of accrual
- must not! change the price of the material or the balance sheet account
If we use freight conditions the moving price is changed.
Because it is dependent on the material (and therefore a condition record works great) we can't or better don't want to use a second position in the purchase order.
Does anybody have a solution for this one?
PC

Thanks for the answer!
This is what I already tried, but it still changes the balance sheet account and the moving average price.
This is what I customized:
Condition ZXYZ
Cond. class A
Calculat.type C
Cond.category B
Item condition yes, delelte, amount/percent and Qte relation yes
Scale base C
Accruals yes
In the Calculation Schema it's defined just before the Actual Price, with Statistical-checkbox marked and Account key ZE1, Account key - accruals / provisions ZE2.
Do you have any idea what I have to change or what else to try?
Thanks a lot!

Balance sheet in Detail

HI SAP GURUS,
I have defined fsv as per accounts. FSV gives detail at gl account level i.e figures for the period for each gl account.My client want to have detail as per the companies act separated as per finance expenses, sales expenses etc for each expense account.
Take example we have maintained single salary gl account. But client want fsv on the basis of the cost center. Here cost center are defined per department. So fsv to be appeared as sales and marketing deprtment as heading and all account of expenses under it which are related to this dept.
In short he want Individual GL account to be bifurcated in FSV on the basis of cost center group. But fsv present consolidated figure for a gl account. I am not able to bifurcate it on cost center basis.
He is not ready to take cost center- cost element wise report for where he can get bifurcation. And fulfill his requirement.
Help me to resolve the issue.
CHEERS

Create Financial Statement Versions (TCode: OB58)
Assign GL accounts as per balance sheet schedule 6 of companies act.
You can refer annual reprt for the same.
In financial statement version we have to give ranges of GL account. So its better if all GL accounts of similar nature are created together with continous GL account number.
Once financial statement version is created, go to TCOde S_ALR_87012279. Fill the necessary details like FSV you created, etc
Once you filled it, execute and you will get the desired report

TRM - Balance Sheet Transfer Long to Short.

Hello pals.
I´m facing a situation with the logic with balance sheet transfer movements. The customizing is releated do transfer installment and final repayments and interest accrual movements.
Example:
Money Market Borrowing contract:
08.10.2010 - $1.200.000,00
C - Borrowing Long Term - $1.200.000
D - Bank clearing account - $1.200.000
let´s say the contract is valid for 5 years. The companie´s concept of short term is 12 months.
We had the borrowing all posted/considered in Long Term, but they need to have the following treatment when start repayments:
They need to transfer the borrowing amount related to 12 months to Short Term automatically:
C - Borrowing Short Term - $240.000
D - Borrowing Long Term - $240.000
because, the repayment must be done considering Short Term and not the Long Term.
I´ve already checked a bunch of SAP notes including 1377341 1496143 1035579 but didn´t see anything related to transfer contract principal amounts.
Does anybody know if we can have this behavior customized in a standard way?
Any suggestion is appreciated.
Thanks a lot.
Volnei.

Hi Volnei,
time-dependant account assignment is not yet possible in standard applications. There is only the additional localized solution for Brasil to do balance-sheet transfer, which you already found in notes.
You may try to do account assignment transfer or valuation class transfer.
Further, you may try to manipulate update types using BAdI FTR_TR_GENERIC for the flows depending on the due term.
BR, Tomislav

Different Format in Title Accounts in Balance Sheet PLD

I am trying to change the default Balance Sheet PLD of the Financial Reports. I want to applied a differente font (or just the same font but bold). The Balance Sheet PLD just uses variables and i dont know how to relate to the OACT table to know if a title or active account to use in a condition

Hi Hector Santos,
It is not possible in default Balance Sheet PLD of the Financial Reports.
because Default Balance Sheet PLD used variables.
IF you want any other solution for this,
Try the below steps,
->> Open the Balance Sheet(System) PLD and Save as New PLD.
->> OPen the New Balance Sheet PLD.
->> Click ALT+ select the Table(OACT) on Properties Widnow.
Regards,
Madhan.

Balance sheet in XBRL format.

Hi,
I want to present balance sheet in XBRL format is it possble to do in ECC 5.0 ??
If yes then please suggest the steps for it.
Plesase help me !! ASAP
Thanks in advance !!
Moderator message: relation to ABAP development unclear, please do more research before asking, do not use terms like "ASAP".
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Apr 9, 2011 9:14 PM

For a very simple balance sheet just listing the balance sheet accounts and their balances for a fiscal year run t-code S_ALR_87012277. Remember to choose from the dynamic selection, Balance sheet account type = X (yes).This report will not have any grouping of accounts to various categories such as Fixed asset, current assets etc.
For a more refined balance sheet, create a Financial statement version from IMG and then use that FS version to run the report S_ALR_87012284.

Caary forward of balance sheet accounts

Hello,
I do have a problem with the carrying forward of balance sheet accounts. I would like to write the closing balance of the accounts of the previous month to the opening balance of the following month. It is for operative planning. I have created following business rule within the Finance application of BPC for the account technical equipment:
Account                    Account Detail      Account   Account Detail   Reverse   Data       Same    YTD
                                 (Closing Bal.)                       (Opening Bal.)    Sign    Src. Type Period
11101020_TEEQMAOW ACLO      11101020_TEEQMAOW AOPE          False     ALL     False    False
I have also created an account transformation rule with analogue specification.
I have referenced both of them in the default.lgf:
*SysLib Stored_Procedure_wrapper.lgl
RunCopyOpening(FINANCE,%RptCurrency_Set%,%Category_Set%)
*Commit
*SysLib Stored_Procedure_wrapper.lgl
RunCalcAccount(FINANCE,%Category_Set%,%RptCurrency_Set%)
*Commit
I have also tried the RunCalcAccount formula with fixed values instead of variable ones.
Before and after I send data with EVDRE, I ran the data manager default package, it runs OK, but it doesn't seem to make any calculations.
Is there any SQL logic or do I have to run the data manger differently? I already have tried some other logic from the user guide and the help, but it didn't work.
Can anybody help me, I'm happy to provide more information.
Thanks in advance!
Christopher

>
Tim Klem wrote:
> Hi Christopher.
>
> The SPCopyOpening works in a very specific manner -- it only copies the closing balance of the prior year's closing period (December, for example -- assuming the fiscal year matches the calendar year) into opening balance of the current period (the period for which you execute the logic).
>
> It doesn't support the ability to copy the prior month's closing period into the current period (e.g., May close into June open).
>
> In other words, SPCopyOpening is really designed to only support a YTD data structure -- YTD P&L values, and a YTD cash flow statement, for instance.
>
> If you have periodic movements, and want to copy May close into June open, you'll need to use the SPRunCalcAccount business rule. This allows you to set a relative period offset (-1), and has a few different options, and a separate business rule table setup, compared to the SPCopyOpening.
>
> Just to test if your SPCopyOpening setup is correct, you might try to load a few numbers into the prior year's December. But if the YTD data structure won't work for you, I wouldn't even waste the time -- focus on the SPRunCalcAccount syntax, and the corresponding "account transformation" business rule table.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tim
Thank you very much Tim!
I know have tried to compose a SPRunCalcAccount Logic , as well as two SQL logics. Sadly, none of them works.
SPRunCalcAccount Logic:
*RUN_STORED_PROCEDURE=SPRUNCALCACCOUNT([Finance], [CPlan1])
I have filled out the Business Rule table for the account transformation with the following information:
11101020_TEEQMAOW    ACLO 11101020_TEEQMAOW AOPE   False     -1     False   0
Is it OK to fill in -1 for Period and to leave the data source empty?
I have written the logic in the default.lgf to test it, but nothing happened? Do I have to include a Time member?
The two script logics are as follows:
*CALC_EACH_PERIOD
*WHEN ACCOUNT
*IS AOPE, MOVEMENTS
*REC(ACCOUNT=ACLO)
*REC(ACCOUNT=AOPE,TIME=NEXT)
*ENDWHEN
AOPE stands for the Opening Balance within the Account subtable Acctdetail. ACLO stands for the Closing Balance.
*WHEN ACCOUNT.FINSTMT
*IS BS
*REC(FACTOR=GET(ACCTDETAIL=ACLO, TIME=PRIOR), ACCTDETAIL=AOPE)
*ENDWHEN
BS stands for Balance Sheet within the Account Property FINSTMT (Financial Statement).
Hope this is enough information for you. I thank you very much in advance!
Christopher

Balance Sheet Active and passive side set up

My client wants the balance sheet as per Indian Standard that Left side Liabilities and Right side Assets how to do that please suggest.
Regards.

Hello Syed,
Thanks for the feedback. I am not quite familiar with the Indian financial report template, however by my testing, it's possible to list the Liability first in the report and then Assets following. The prerequisite is to set the Liability to Active Group because the system will list the Accounts in Active Group first and this will not affect the amount of relative account. Please test through the above steps to see if this is what you want.
Regards,
Xu Zhang
SAP Business One Forums Team

Balance Sheet Readjustment run

Hello
when I have executed the Balance Sheet Readjustment run using transaction code : F.5F I could able to find out a huge transaction was posted for a dummy profit center.
I couldnu2019t able to find out which document is causing such a huge transaction. Can any one help me to find out the original document, which need to check when we are running the Balance Sheet Readjustment run. As well please let me know a functionality and the configuration related to this
Regards
RS

The Balance Sheet Readjustment run is done for :
1) The document line items where it is not possible to enter Business area,
2) The document line items in which Business Area was incorrectly filled out of mistake.
3) Automatically generated line Item like Tax etc.
Hence after this run system makes an ajustment entry for those documents so as to tally the balance sheet Business Area wise.
VMG

Relating to balance sheet

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for