RFx Response Submission Outside Firewall in SRM 7 Enhancement pack 1.

Dear Experts,
As you know, the bid response part has been moved to SUS in srm 7 enhancement pack 1 to enable the suppliers to respond to bid invitation from SUS system itself.
Does it mean that the  suppliers cannot respond to bid invitation in SRM server directly or there is an option for customers to activate the customizing switch for that?
SUS system may not be used by all suppliers of a buyer.
Could you please throw some light on it?
Thanks and regards,
Ranjan

Hi Ranjan,
Option on if you want the bidder to create response in SRM or SUS is controlled in the transaction type with a field called Bid system
Here choose External supplier system or  Internal SAP SRM system.
When you create an RFX you will have a field called Bidder system where you choose External supplier system or Internal SAP SRM system. This field be already populated depending on what is set in your transaction.
Here External supplier system will be your SUS (decoupled concept) and Internal SAP SRM system will be EBP (normal sourcing)
Regards
Sam

Similar Messages

  • RFX Submission outside firewall

    Hi all,
    We are running SRM 7.01 and implemented the RFX submission outside firewall functionality to let the suppliers to quote in SUS.
    Question is if we send the RFX to SUS (Bid System=External Supplier System) then it is not possible to use the Surrogate Bidding functionality.
    So the problem is if we have suppliers that use SUS and suppliers that they don´t, we cannot mix them as bidders in the same Bid Invitation. Is any solution for this?
    Regads,
    Ezequiel

    Hello Ezequiel,
    As mentioned by Ramki above , " Typically surrogate bidding is used when suppliers cannot submit bids online. You can always replicate bidders & contact person from SRM to SUS. Then they can start submitting RFx responses in SUS".
    Now as per the details given by you , " The idea is that every supplier will work in SUS in the future, but this will be achieved in a year or two. In the meantime, we have SUS vendors and at the same time vendors that are not yet in SUS."
    Here as per my understanding , you will not be able to make use of the feature RFX Response submission outside firewall functionality for the vendors which are not existing in SUS. To get the end to end scenario working you need to have the vendors existing in both SRM and SUS system with a contact person. And hence you cannot mix the suppliers that use SUS and the one's who don't.
    With regards to the surrogate bidding here , with SRM 702 the option to enable the Surrogate bid flag for the SUS suppliers is provided and the internal buyer's can submit the responses on their behalf from the SRM system. (similar to the surrogate bidding process in normal sourcing scenario).
    As a workaround for the surrogate bidding in SRM701 the internal buyer have to login to the sus portal to submit the responses on behalf of the suppliers.
    Hope this helps to resolve your query.
    Best Regards,
    Rahul

  • Pricing in SRM for RFx response

    Dear SRM Experts,
    We are using sourcing scenario in SRM 7.0 EHP 1 and are inviting bids from international as well domestic vendors.
    Bids contain varoious price components apart from the basic price like deleivery cost, insuarance, packing and forwarding etc. Based on this price components we wanted to calculate the landed cost of the material.
    Since SRM only has one calculation schema 0100 for mainatenance group 01QU ( RFx response) i wanted inputs on how difference schema can be mapped into SRM for calculating the net price from RFx response.
    Any pointers on the same will be apperciated.
    Regards,
    Darshan

    Hi Ramki,
    First of all i am really honoured to have reply from you. I have referred your book many a times during the implementation as well as support phase.
    Presently we are working for one of the client wherein the requirement is that the responses received from various bidders having values against different pricing condition needs to compared before the L1 bidder is finalized and PO is placed. Landed cost of material needs to be calculated for the Bids received from international as well as domestic bidders which would have different conditions.
    I have created various condition types in the maintanace group 01QU (RFx responses). So that those conditions can be populated in RFx at time of publishing and we can receive the values against those conditions in response. There is need to calculate the landed cost of material at the time of comparison report generation. 
    Using IPC i think wont be feasible because anyways we need to calculate landed differently for domestic as international vendors. Also from stability perspective this is not advisable.
    I would request if i can get pointers to map this requirement.
    With Regards,
    Darshan

  • SRM Open Public RFx Response

    Hi Team
    Kindly we use SRM 7 Extend Classic Scenario and follow the follow scenario
    1- Create SC and Approve it
    2- Convert SC to Public RFx document and approve it
    3- Supplier create RFx response
    4- simulation log on is complete and each permission submit it
    now system should be ready to open supplier response to check best price but when I try to open any supplier response I got the following error
    Price RFx response opening has not been performed

    Hello Ali,
    Did you send a Quotation with price? or with price $0,00?
    If you would like to do a RFI without price, define the Detailed Price Information field with the value"No price".
    Rgs,
    Pedro Marques

  • SRM RFx / RFx Response Condition Configuration

    Hi Team
    Kindly I need your help to know how configure SRM RFx /RFx Response condition
    Waiting your help

    Hi Team
    Kindly when add item condition at RFx document we got the following issue
    Error : Condition information is incomplete , so please advise
    Kindly find attachment document

  • SRM RFx Response Undo Accept/Reject Action

    Kindly we use SRM 7 EHP1 , when I try to find out undo accept or undo
    reject button on Screen but there is no button for undo action
    Is that available in SRM 7 EHP1 ? and if it is available why is not
    shown ? or need any configuration ?
    Please advise ASAP

    Hi
    1687814  - Rfx response is not editable after Undo Accept for purchaser
    is not correct note , my question is
    when I try to find out undo accept or undo
    reject button on Screen but there is no button for undo action

  • SRM 7: Open Technical RFx response

    Hi,
    Can anybody tell me how to catch the event on click the button "Open Technical RFx Response" and check some validation logic and according to stop the event process by raisin an error message in SRM 7 Bid invitation process.
    Edited by: Angshuman Chakraborty on Jul 27, 2011 12:37 PM

    Hi Chakri,
    You can reset_mesages by deleting message log. try this.. it might helps.
    data: l_wd_view_controller         type ref to if_wd_view_controller,
            l_api_wdr_msg_area           type ref to if_wd_window_controller,
            l_wd_message_area            type ref to if_wd_message_area.
      l_wd_view_controller ?= wd_this->wd_get_api( ).
      l_api_wdr_msg_area ?= l_wd_view_controller->get_embedding_window_ctlr( ).
      l_wd_message_area = l_api_wdr_msg_area->get_message_area( ).
      l_wd_message_area->reset_messages( i_keep_current = 'X ' ).  // try with 'X'. and ' ' .
    Cheers,
    Kris.

  • SRM 7: Open Technical RFx response button action in e-Bidding

    Hi,
    Can anybody tell me how to catch the event on click the button "Open Technical RFx Response" and check some validation logic and according to stop the event process by raisin an error message in SRM 7 Bid invitation process.

    Can anybody say what is the Object Type for this action?

  • Can't Create Contract From RFx Response (SAP SRM 7.0)

    Dear Expert,
    Could you help me,
    i have create rfx, response the rfx and accepted the rfx response.
    After i have accepted that RFx, i would like to make a contract from this RFx response. Via menu Create Contract.
    But this error is show up.
    Error application is coming up.
    20111020
    RHESAS
    093450
    sapgsd
    http://sapgsd.garuda-indonesia.com:8011/sap/bc/webdynpro/sapsrm/wda_l_fpm_oif
    OBJECTS_OBJREF_NOT_ASSIGNED
    Access via 'NULL' object reference not possible.
    Method: PST95E57RQRHC49FBLT5QTJBJT9Z of program /1BCWDY/NC67WCWB50U4IGZ40GZ1==CP
    Method: IF_WDR_VIEW_DELEGATE~WD_DO_MODIFY_VIEW of program /1BCWDY/NC67WCWB50U4IGZ40GZ1==CP
    Method: DO_MODIFY_VIEW of program CL_WDR_DELEGATING_VIEW========CP
    Method: MODIFY_VIEW of program CL_WDR_VIEW===================CP
    Method: DO_MODIFY_VIEW of program CL_WDR_CLIENT_COMPONENT=======CP
    Method: DO_MODIFY_VIEW of program CL_WDR_WINDOW_PHASE_MODEL=====CP
    Method: PROCESS_REQUEST of program CL_WDR_WINDOW_PHASE_MODEL=====CP
    Method: PROCESS_REQUEST of program CL_WDR_WINDOW=================CP
    Method: EXECUTE of program CL_WDR_MAIN_TASK==============CP
    Method: IF_WDR_RUNTIME~EXECUTE of program CL_WDR_MAIN_TASK==============CP
    http://sapgsd.garuda-indonesia.com:8011/sap/bc/webdynpro/sapsrm/wda_l_fpm
    Do you have any idea to solve this issue?
    (we are activate Procurement for Public Sector Functions )
    Regards,
    Rhesa Syahrial

    Hi All,
    I have solved this issue.
    I missed the configuration in Partner Grouping schema ID.
    Regards,
    Rhesa Syahrial

  • PO  creation From accepted RFx response

    Hi,
    Please can you help ME, i am not able to create PO of services, here is my process :
    SC created in SRM - > SC goes to sourcing -> buyer creates RFx -> RFx is sent to bidder -> bidder processes RFx Response -> buyer accepts RFx response -> buyer creates follow on document (PO) from RFx Response (create PO).
    Error message:  /SAPPSSRM/HIER 015
    Product type XXX  of item differs from type XXX of product XXX.
    N.B : PO based on materials number work fine.
    Thank you,
    Karim

    Hello Ivy,
    I'm working with Karim, here are the maintained entries:
    (I've not listed all Z entries, they have all the same assignments)
    BIDP    HIER_SE   
    BIDX    HIER_SRM   
    ECPO    HIER_SRM   
    EXTR    HIER_SE   
    PCTR    HIER_SRM    Achat de services
    QUOT    HIER_SRM    Achat de services
    RFCR    HIER_SRM   
    RFPM    HIER_SRM   
    RFPP    HIER_SRM   
    RFPS    HIER_SRM   
    RFQU    HIER_SRM   
    ZAMI    HIER_SRM   
    ZAVN    HIER_SRM   
    ZBCC    HIER_SRM   
    ZCRS    HIER_SRM   
    ZCTR    HIER_SRM   
    ZCVN    HIER_SRM   
    ZMAL    HIER_SRM   
    ZMCA    HIER_SRM   
    ZMCR    HIER_SRM   
    Thanks in advance
    Stéphane

  • Create RFx Response: An error occurred in the PD Layer transaction terminated

    Hello Experts,
    Currently we are in SRM 7.02 implemenation: we are facing below problem while creating RFx response with popup screen.
                             "An error occurred in the PD Layer transaction terminated"
    For this we have checked below
    1. http://scn.sap.com/thread/1912966    ----> it didn't help
    2. We have assigned SAP_ALL role to bidder also ----> Facing same issue
    3. Check Number ranges ---> everything is fine.
    there is no clue from above points.
    Thanks & Regards
    Sandeep.

    Hello Sandeep,
    I am facing the same problem while creating the RFx response in SUS side. Same error occurred while i am creating the Rfx response with bidder.
    error: An error occurred in the PD Layer transaction terminated
    Could you please let me know, did you find any solution for this issue?
    Thanks in advance!!
    Thanks,
    Anil

  • A fatal error occured in the PD Layer during create Supplier RFx response

    Dear SRM 7 Experts,
    I am implementing SRM 7.  I can successfully create a Supplier RFx Response on behalf of a supplier using the Surrogate Bid functionality.  However, if I log on as a supplier contact person and try to create a Supplier RFx Response, I get error u201D A fatal error occured in the PD Layer. The transaction needs to be terminatedu201D. 
    Number ranges for Supplier RFx response (BUS2202) are maintained and assigned to the transaction type correctly.
    What could be the problem? 
    Kind regards
    Pedzi

    Hi
    Here is the thread which solved the same problem:
    Re: A fatal error occured in the PD Layer during RFx response
    with regards
    Manjunath

  • Condition type error in RFx response

    Dear Experts,
    I have created a new condition type with condition class Discounts/percentages
    and with Fixed amount.
    This created a condition type i ahve mainatined in the "process condition group" under maintanace group '01QU' so that i can excluisvely use for at the RFx response.
    When i am processing the RFx response i am getting an error
    "A fatal error occured in the PD Layer. The transaction needs to be terminated."
    Kindly advise .
    The intention is i have to certain condition types exclusively at the time of RFx response.

    Hi Saha,
    I have not create a new condition in my template, but... I have the same error when I try to create a Quot as Vendor "A fatal error occured in the PD Layer. The transaction needs to be terminated".
    I´m in SRM 7.0 with SP 08.
    Any Idea?
    Thanks,
    Pedro Marques

  • Item info gets blanked while creating RFx response

    Hi,
    I am facing a strange issue while creating the RFx response (SRM 7.0).
    when I try to create a Bid, the item info (required quantity and Unit) gets blanked and this fields are blocked.
    Did any one faced any similar issue. Any possible solutions.
    Regards,
    Francisco Salvado

    Hi,
    This subject is widely discussed in SDN, you could have searched SDN before posting this thread.
    As you do not have info record, then tax code defaulted in the Purchase order by maintaining condition record only  with your material (may be with other criteria)which you said item number 10.More details on default tax code, check link:
    Default Tax code in P.O
    Also check link for SDN rules
    https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/HOME/RulesofEngagement
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • How to hide Total value in RFX response webdynpro component

    HI experts,
           We are working on SRM 7.0 and there is a requirement to hide the Total Value that appers on RFX Response Header for a particular Role.The webdynpro component is FPM_IDR_COMPONENT and View is IDR_VIEW..I have searched the SDN and found that CL_FPM_IDR class methods can be used to hide the Items.But method SET_ITEMS_VISIBILITY sets the visibility for all items,but i want for a particular pair.Please advise me how to hide this field value pair dynamically.
    Regards
    Sonika

    What you might try is to remove the particular key_value pair from the lt_items table which is passed to the IDR.
    So search in(WDA/Assistance class/Feeder class ) and find out the place ,from where this table is filled and called to set items on IDR.
    Remove the pair before from table before the call to IDR.

Maybe you are looking for

  • HT1689 my iphone 5s is not working shows that it needs to connect to itunes

    my iphone 5s is not working it shows that it needs to connect to itunes

  • Billing due report

    Hi , can any one help me on this . This order shows as open and is appearing on our billing due report.  But item is not on block, has been invoiced and has no incompletion errors. any body got the solution please inform  will rewrded. Best regards,

  • Could not activate

    could not activate iPhone                        

  • Visaul C++ - jni.h not found (simple?)

    Hi, I'm working on a native call and are following the JNI tutorial. I use Visual C++. My compiler don't find the jni.h. #include <jni.h>The error message I resive: Can not open the include file jni_md.hI usually don't do C++. What shall I do?

  • Lightroom 4.1 SDK: What's new...

    The download link is presently broken but it looks like SDK will be out with Lr4.1: http://www.adobe.com/devnet/photoshoplightroom.html The pdf guide is there (link not broken). Once officially released (and/or download link fixed), I will try to do