Settlement cost table

Hi
Please let me know in whcih table I can check the order actual cost.. Thing is i want to verify the settlement of the order. Some job will run if the order has settled and its actual cost is zero.
The PMCO wont help in this ..Please help me

HI tenna,
In PMCO table select the input as follows:
Obj.no.=(Inout Order No in AUFK table and get the  Object no)
Value Type =4
Inthe out put d the summation of  WRT00 to WRT16 you will get the Total Actual cost of a order.
Regards
Dhiren

Similar Messages

  • Table for Settlement Cost(CJI3) for a project

    Hi All,
    I have a requirement to develop a report for a project, in that i got a req.  to find out the settlement cost for a project.
    we have standard report CJI3 to find the settel cost for a project but I am unable to debug the program as it use logical databases(PSJ).
    Please advise me and let me know any table or Function module exists for same.
    Regards,
    Venkat

    Hi,
    The table /s you are looking for could be one of these;
    RPSCO   Project info database: Costs, Revenues, Finances
    COSP: Cost Object: Cost totals for external postings
    COSS: Cost totals for internal postings
    COSB:Total variances
    COBK:Document header
    COEP: Line items
    You may need more than one table to meet your requirements.
    Pl confirm, if useful.
    regards
    Muraleedharan.R
    091 9880028904

  • Standard table for production order settlement cost

    Hello,
    Is there any standard table available which carries the production order settlement cost?

    Dear,
    Once you do Production order settlement using T.Code KO88.
    You will find all relevant tables once RKACSHOW is executed for the corresponding object .
    Try the table is COEP
    Thanks,
    MS

  • Internal Order Report  S_ALR_87012993 showing settled cost

    HI ,
    The issue here is related to IO report  S_ALR_87012993 showing up settled cost against a particular Cost Element/GL account. However when we use the drill down function it says "No actual Line Item exist". I have checked the line item details for that particular GL account which does not have any posting to it with the said IO and moreover no FI Posting is done to that GL account during that relevant period. Hence the IO report is showing up variance .
    I have checked the Settlement documents for  that period for the said IO (Table AUAK ) through Transaction Code KOB8 , but none of these settlement indicates that particular Cost element/GL Account.
    I have executed KOB1 which does not show up any line item with the said combination.
    Any idea why the system /report showing up such settlement to that particular Cost Element/GL account which does not have any Actual Line Item posted with that particular IO.
    Regards
    Jaydip

    This is very very strange. Are you sure is not facing some profile problems to view information ?
    KOB1 and S_ALR_87012993 have the same information: actual.
    When you run settlement, it goes to inventory delivery account or to wip account depends on order status.
    Sometimes people set a different account for settlement.
    Check the balance account in transaction FS10N/FBL3N it must be the same because FI and CO are balanced for this account.
    Regards

  • Settled Cost still shows in Reports

    Dear Consultants
    I have settled 50 % cost from WBS element to Cost Center and in reports it shows all the 100% cost on that WBS element. Can anyone please tell me how I can show only the remaining 50% of cost in report and not the settled cost. If there any particular report or setting..please help me
    Asif

    Pls check whether 50% settled cost showing is in statistical form. cost element catagory 99/ value type 11.
    if it is so, customise the value catagory settings as per SAP note 676123. refer section 1b.
    you can block the update to table rpsco.
    also refer note 328203
    hope this helps you.

  • Costs and settled costs layout in standard reports

    Hello guys !
    what needs to be done in order to have a report, for example, S_ALR_87013543 , splitted by costs and settled costs (debit/credit) ? I can't find a layout or smth.
    Thanks guys.
    Laimonas

    Hi
    Include this ZPP2 in a separate report group (GR51)... After that,
    1. Create the transaction code,say, ZF01_TCODE from Se93
    2. Choose "Transaction with parameters".. Press enter
    3. Enter START_REPORT in the Transaction field and press Enter
    4. Select the Skip initial screen and Inherit GUI attributes check boxes
    5. On the same screen, scroll down to the Default Values table and select parameters D_SREPOVARI-REPORTTYPE and
    D_SREPOVARI-REPORT.
    6. Enter RW for the report type and your report group ZCC8 as the report value
    7. Now you can save your transaction and transport it to other systems
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • FI-AA: Unable to settle costs off of AUC

    In Depreciation area 01 (Book Depreciation), planned/posted values were recorded on an AUC via settlement from WBS Elements during FY 2006.
    In Depreciation area 80 (Insurance Values), planned/posted values were recorded on an AUC via settlement from WBS Elements during FY 2006.  Planned depreciation values are calculated and post as Non-Insurable value on the AUC during FY 2006.
    In FY 2007, all values posted to the associated WBS Element are journal entried off to another WBS Element and the AUC is zeroed out once the settlement from the WBS Element has posted.  The Non-Insurable value has been carried forward to FY 2007 and remains on AUC.
    In FY 2008, an AMR is created.  Both Settlement to AMR for Current Year and Settlement to AMR for Prior Year are executed but the Non-Insurable value still remains on the AUC.  This has prevented us from Closing the WBS Element and deactivating the AUC.
    I'm assuming that when you execute Settlement to AMR - Prior Year that it only goes back and looks at the previous FY and not all previous years, which is why the Non-Insurable value remains on the AUC. 
    I need to clear this Non-Insurable value, which was posted two years ago, off the AUC so that we can Close the WBS Element.  Any ideas on how to do that?
    Also when it comes to AMR creation, is it common practice to create the AMR at the same time the AUC is created or at least have the AMR created by the end of the next FY?  In our situation above I think if we would have created the AMR in FY 2007 and executed Settlement to AMR - Prior FY in FY 2007 we not have encountered this problem.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.

    Thanks for the response.
    Note 425601, if I'm reading it correctly, explains how to settle costs posted in previous years from the WBS Element to an AUC. 
    In my situation all costs have been settled from the WBS Element.  I have an AUC that has costs on it from two years ago that I don't know how to settle to an AMR.  This preventing us from Closing the WBS Element.

  • TX CNS41 - settled cost from internal order to WBS element not displayed

    Hi PS Expets,
    I have a question regarding transaction CNS41 "Structure Overview" where cost settled from an internal order is not displayed in in the report for a selected project. This is in a ECC version 5.0
    Settled costs from internal orders are posted with transaction type KOAO on WBS elements and when you check report RCNSTFCO you can see that the following transaction types are deselected when executing transaction CNS41:
    delete t_rpsco_m where vorga = 'KOAO' "<   insert
                          or vorga = 'KOAL' "<   insert
                          or vorga = 'KOAP' "<   insert
                          or vorga = 'KOAQ' "<   insert
                          or vorga = 'KOAR'."<   insert
      CALL FUNCTION 'HFPM_RPSCO_TO_RPSCO_LIS_CONV'
    This is implemented according to OSS note 51971 in order to eliminate internal business volume in the project structure when executing a PS hierarchy report.
    But this also eliminate the display of the cost  from the internal order.
    Any ideas or a work around in order to display settled cost from an internal order on a WBS element in transaction CNS41
    Kind regards,
    Anne

    Hello Tison.
    I guess you have the Project created with a BAPI in your system in background. As far as I have seen I'd try the following in ABAP to create Partners in the Project Definition: BAPI_BUS2001_PARTNER_CREATE_M or the corresponding method ProjectDefinitionPI.PartnerCreateMultiple. This should happen in background when the Project is created also.
    Best regards.
    Jens Schmid

  • Report for settled costs of product cost collectors

    Friends,
    Is there any report where i can see all the settled costs for cost collector for previous period. I can see individual costs through KKBC_PKO but i need one for all the cost collectors in one report.

    Sridhar,
    As always you got a answer. Thanks. i tried this before but missed running KKRV before this. Now this is good.

  • Define a settlement cost element for receiver type FXA

    Hi,
    While settling the AUC internal order,i am gettingg the below error.Kindly advice me
    Define a settlement cost element for receiver type FXA
    Message no. KD506
    Diagnosis
    In allocation structure A1 (controlling area AFCO), you did not define which cost element should be used when settling costs/revenues of the sender. Nor did you define receiver type FXA.
    Procedure
    Assign a different allocation structure to the settlement sender (-> Master data -> Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters), or maintain allocation structure A1.
    Thanks
    Supriya

    Hi Supriya,
    Go to SPRO-> Controlling > Internal orders>Actual postings>Settlement> Maintain Allocation structures & choose A1 and go to assignment, select the relevant category like raw material / consumption and then go to source, check the range of cost elements first then click the settlement cos t element and under that choose FXA and define the settlement cost element which must be created under 22 category.
    After maintainig the above, you will not get the error anymore.
    Thanks & Regards
    Anuj Agarwal

  • IW32  needed Plan Cost and Actual Cost table name

    Hello ,
    In IW32 transaction Plan Cost and Actual cost in cost tab ---Table Name.
    Req: needed  plan cost & actual cost table names  for particular order number.( For New Report )
    Can you please let me know where Plan cost & actual cost get stored in IW32 in Cost tab ( table name / function module name ) or how its get calcualted for particular order number.
    Thanks in advance !
    Regards
    Rahul

    hi ,
    i too had same issue , i wrote following FS for that :
    Actual and planned cost  from PMCO-WRT00 to WRT12(the sum of values should be considered for actual as well as planned ) for  PMCO-OBJNR taken from CAUFV -OBJNR for order number  AFIH-AUFNR  and also currency from CAUFV-WAERS .
    Actual cost will have valuation type PMCO-WRTTP = 4 and planned cost will have valuation type  PMCO-WRTTP = 1 , which will be placed in different column
    hope this helps
    regards
    satish

  • WBS settled cost in sales order

    Hi,
    We settlele the WBS to Sales order and where we can see the settled cost in sales order.
    Kindly suggest.
    Thanks,

    Dear Sudha,
    You can check if the costs are transferred from WBS element in CJI3 (you will see a credit posting for the WBS element)
    You can check if the costs are debited to the Sales Order using KVBI (you wlll see a debit posting for the Sales Order item)
    Note: Cost elements that you see could be a settlement cost element /original cost element based on the allocation structure used.
    Kind Regards
    Umapathi G

  • Settlement cost of an order

    Hi friends,
    Is there any way i see the settlement cost in any of the reports?
    In IW39 i am able to get the settlement cost in the report but the cost is shown as zero.
    Is there any other standard report available.
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    Vivek

    Hii Vivek
    You can also refer the following forum question.
    [Settlement of PM Order|Settlement of PM Order]
    Regards
    Makarand Gurjar

  • Define a settlement cost element for receiver type CTR

    Hi, i work for real estate company and we just implemented SAP. were on our process of closing our books and we are tied by error during PS settlement. House repair, which is an income statement account and cost element as well, are monitored in Project Systems with settlement rule set to GL. Postings will initially be posted as Project Cost WBS and will be settled to house repair GL. however, someone advised us that only balance sheet accounts should be settled to GL. Cost and expenses should be settled to Cost Center and so we changed the configuration and business process to posting costs directly to GL house repair and settlemet rule is to be settled to CTR. After the change in configurations and settlement rule, we still cannot process settlement due to this error "Define a settlement cost element for receiver type CTR". Please help, i may have missed a step in system configurations. Thanks thanks

    Define a settlement cost element for receiver type CTR
    Check in OKO6 whether you have defined the required Settlement Cost Element to the allocation structure.
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Unable to join Unit Cost(Cost table) to Sales Table.

    Hi All,
    I am beginner for OBIEE technology.May be this question is silly for you but i am facing issue in it.I am mentioning my issue below:-
    We have two tables one is SALES(Fact Table ) and second one is COST (Fact Table). I want to apply Calculation Measures on this logical tables(BMM Layer).As per Oracle document,when they are dragging Unit_Cost column from Cost table (Physical Layer) to Sales table then no logical source table is creating for them but when i am trying this then I am getting one more logical source table (COST).So my doubts are :-
    1) Why is the other LST is creating for me?
    2) I s there any join require between COST and SALES Table to remove this Logical source table(Cost)?
    Please let me know if any clarification is require on this issue.
    Thanks
    Shashank Jain

    it is correct. we you have two or more sources for same logical table obiee will create LTS for each source. you can't join these two fact tables physically but they will join using conformed dimension(common dim) based on physical schema design in physical layer.
    Thanks
    Jay.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Bridge CS4 always opens in the same folder

    Since I upgraded to Photoshop CS4, Bridge always opens in the same folder. It used to open up whatever folder I was working on last. There must be a setting somewhere to tell Bridge to open the last visited folder but I can't seem to find it. Any ide

  • No "Voice Dialer" prompting after GB Update

    Has anyone else had an issue with the stock "voice dialer" no longer working properly since the recent OTA to 2.3.4 (Gingerbread)?  I have the same "won't appear / won't disappear" issue with the voicemail notifications, but I have one other issue, a

  • Internal error in XML parser

    While parsing XML file one of the elements of which consists picture of 20K size encoded with MIME the follow error appeares: Cannot parse file:An Internal Error occurred. Please post a Bug report to the XML Discussion forum at http://technet.oracle.

  • Seeking help for VisualAge for Java

    Hi, I am using VisualAge 3.5 Professional version to develop Java applications. But I don't know how to build an independent Java application that I can run it outside VisualAge. Can someone give me some tips? THanks! I can build an application, and

  • Can I edit?

    I totally green here. I have an old version of Acrobat - prof 7. A friend sent me a pdf with complex tables. I thought instead of making my own document, I could open her pdf in Acrobat and edit. But I tried and don't see a way to edit the cells. Is